Google Creators Interviewed by Playboy
Cristiano wrote in to say that an interview with the creators of Google is appearing in the latest Playboy Magazine. That in and of itself is of little note, until one realizes that the issue of Playboy in question is already en route to subscribers and hits newsstands tomorrow, the same day that their IPO auction begins. News.com.com speculates that the SEC may be interested, since this could be a breach of the "quiet period" companies must endure before going public. It may also be nothing but a mistake in scheduling, but it has cast doubts on Google's IPO for some.
Google+playboy a geeks wet dream!
I only buy it for the tech articles.
Bring on the booble jokes...
I can now tell my wife:
"See honey, I buy playboy for the interviews"
This
You might have a bigger problem than Google and the SEC ;)
and this might be one of the only times when geeks are mentioned in the same breath with playboy, hot models, and boobs!
Let's have a race to see how many people can make the same joke in the first 100 posts!!!
Okay, it's time to show some serious geek/nerd muscle. Let's slashdot the biggest prize of all- PLAYBOY!
My Systems
Google for porn and you get over 8 million hits, buy playboy for google and you get only one issue.
I'd put my money on google...
The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
I may be in soup as I just visited playboy.com
Being tracked for reading an article about google (well it was from playboy)
Don't look down the barrel when it's loaded ;)
If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
Like /.ers would actually read the articles.
who the hell reads playboy for the articles anyway?
--
Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!
They just did it so that they could up their page ranking on words such as "pr0n".
Am I the only one imagining a new "seasonal" logo for the "oo" in google?
Please do NOT show their nude pictures!
From what I understand, you can't actually go and buy Google shares. They're slowly giving them out to prominent bloggers. Though they'll probably end up for sale on eBay soon enough.
On John Dvorak's blog there is a picture of the founder of google in drag accompanying this headline. Perhaps playboy will include this photo in their article?
Because the story submitter absent-mindedly forgot, here's the link to Playboy. ... Like you didn't know it already, lonely geek! (I bet all the images on the site are "mysteriously" pre-cached.)
- sm
You have got to be shitting me. This guy takes the link RIGHT from the article... and then gets modded informative. Jesus christ I hate this place nowadays.
...appropriate.
That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
Actually i was just thinking. Google has Froogle for cheapos, so Google should have Oogle for sickos, er I mean men.
...32,000 techies lost their jobs at various major software development companies on Friday, August 13th, allegedly for visiting a site contianing pornographic material. An anonymous vice president of information technology at a Fortune 500 company had this to say: "This represents a great step in removing these future pedophiles from our workforce. In our analyses we found that 86% of pedophiles had been exposed to pornography before the age of 18. Plain and simple, this proves that pornography is a gateway drug to sexual deviancy. Thank goodness we found these freaks of nature before they could cause any real harm to our enterprise."
What has *science* done?!? -- Dr. Weird (ATHF)
No, but what I have a problem with is girls who make assumptions and generalizations. The fact that this got modded insightful is beyond me. Playboy has, and has always had, quality articles and interviews that are both interesting and informative.
Yeah, they have some great looking women as well, and you find it in the porno section, but honestly, I'd buy the magazine without the women as a Gentleman's Maxim that isn't as focused on products and crap as GQ or Esquire.
Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
It gets better -- the alt text for the pics of the two Google guys is "Matt Damon." This is surely the first time geeks have been mistaken for hunky Hollywood stars!
I should buy some cement.
Playboy is not pornography (vulgarly called porn, p0rn, pr0n and/or derivatives), it's erotica.
Are you sure? Maybe I don't like Playboy. According to Wikipedia, "Erotica is what I like. Pornography is what you like, you pervert."
ResidntGeek
And that must of been the second time when geeks are mentioned in the same breath with playboy, hot models, and boobs!
Finally a slashdot post where I can RTFA.
What do you think the oo's will look like in Google's logo on when this is issue is released?
gUUgle, I'm feeling lucky