Slashdot Mirror


Todd Need[ed] a Liver

Mr. Christmas Lights writes "According to this CNN article, Todd Krampitz's liver transplant operation was a success. What is significant about this is how he used a multi-media campaign to get a donor - this included billboards stating 'I need a Liver. Please help Save my Life' that all pointed to his web site at ToddNeedsALiver.com where you can read more. Certainly a novel use of the World Wide Web."

50 of 365 comments (clear)

  1. Illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't understand. I thought organ transplants could not be done privately and could only be done through organ transplant lists where you were ranked on necessity and the immediate terminality of your situation?

    So, how exactly would a media campaign expedite such a transplant?! It's not like he could pay someone for it and I'm pretty sure they require anonymity. As happened in this case, I don't believe they allow a specific person to donate a specific organ to a specific recipient without going through the hospital process as there might be someone else chosen as more needy or more urgent.

    And at any rate, this just further shows the disparity between those who have money and those who do not. Those who have it can do a media blitz to get a liber or find their abducted child and so on while those without it are fucked.

    By the way - his girlfriend is hot. Too bad they seem like a couple of religious nuts.

    1. Re:Illegal? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your right, I don't think he can personally "buy" an organ, but by him driving a campaign forward and raising awareness of the issues,they will hopefully allow more people to become donars. More donars means more organs, and hopefully the list will get shorter.

      It does not say on his website exactly how he became the recipient, but I find it hard to believe it came from a direct donation specifically to him.

      I believe simply his age and other attributes made him a better donar recipient than (say) a 98 year old guy with other chronic problems, but I may be wrong.

      From the "Donatealife" website, they say the following:


      While donated organs and tissue are shared at the national level, the laws that govern donation vary from state to state. Therefore, it is important for you to know what you can do to ensure your decision to be a donor is carried out.


      He has certainly raised awareness, and I wish him the best of luck in the (now much brighter) future!

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Illegal? by chimpo13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It does not say on his website exactly how he became the recipient, but I find it hard to believe it came from a direct donation specifically to him.

      A quote from the CNN article:

      In a statement, Julie Krampitz said "a generous family" donated the organ, and that it was given specifically for her husband.

    3. Re:Illegal? by lightknight · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not?

      Open up the white market for organs. Make it profitable to sell your kidneys. Hell, even when Uncle Joe dies pennyless, he can leave you something. When such things become profitable, you would be amazed how many people are willing to *donate*.

      Life isn't fair. But I'd rather have the market determine fairness than some committee that claims to be "fair and impartial". In the first case, you need money. In the second case, you need to be the nephew of the person on the board.

      Which system would you prefer? One that bases fairness on cash, or the other which bases fairness on being related to the guy at the top?

      And lastly, who is to say that one person's life is worth more than another's. No matter how much time is left, it is the right of that person to fight for their life. Anything less is inhuman.

      Best Quote ever (Babylon 5): "Life isn't fair. But what if it were? What if we really did deserve all those horrible, nasty things that happened to us? And that is why I take great solace in the fact that life isn't fair"

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    4. Re:Illegal? by QuantumFTL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By the way - his girlfriend is hot. Too bad they seem like a couple of religious nuts.

      Mods: I don't know about you, but this seems a lot like flaimbait.

      Seriously, I don't understand why this type of speech is moderated up on slashdot. Saying it's "too bad" that someone "seems to be a religious nut" because they have one frickin bible verse on their web site borders on bigotry. It's one thing to disagree with someone's views, but to pity someone because they have faith in a higher power... would this be modded up if it read "He seems really nice, it's a shame that he's gay"?

      The poster has every right to say it, but should we really be promoting these kinds of things with our mod points?

      Justin

      P.S. I'm no big fan of political correctness but sometimes the anti-religious bias on this site drives me crazy.

  2. i'm glad he's doing well but by polished+look+2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    does this mean that the person who is able to finance a media blitz will be first to receive a liver or other major organ?

    1. Re:i'm glad he's doing well but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In fact, yes.

      Read the CNN article in which one of the people who works with/for the transplant list group cites that this sets a questionable precident by bypassing standard processes and channels and establishes an unfair and unlevel playing field.

    2. Re:i'm glad he's doing well but by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yup, I'm after a six figure sum for my small but low milage penis.

    3. Re:i'm glad he's doing well but by NearlyHeadless · · Score: 2, Interesting
      does this mean that the person who is able to finance a media blitz will be first to receive a liver or other major organ?
      Hopefully, in the future, we'll be able to just buy the organs directly from the family of the deceased. It would be a lot cheaper and the incentive would ease the shortage of organs and save many lives.

      We have this weird superstition that there is something wrong with this. I'm sure that in a few decades people will wonder what we could have been thinking, just as we look back on those times, a couple of hundred years ago, when autopsies were illegal and medical students and researchers had to skulk around illegally buying corpses.

    4. Re:i'm glad he's doing well but by forgoil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hopefully, in the future, we'll simply grow any organs that would be needed. That is unless some idiots stop this particular brand of research, but I hope there are countries who decides that this is still a good idea. Probably not from the kindness of their hearts, but out of lust for money.

    5. Re:i'm glad he's doing well but by Nurseman · · Score: 4, Informative
      does this mean that the person who is able to finance a media blitz will be first to receive a liver or other major organ?"

      In theory, the sickest person that is compatable is supposed to get the organ. In practice, being rich/famous probably gets you moved up a few places, witness Mickey Mantle and David Crosby, who both got liver's soon after their cases were wildly publicized. I think on the flip side, these very public cases help everyone, because more organs get donated.
      Interesting totally off topic side note. Most major instituions prep 2 people for each organ, in case there is a problem with the first person, eg, organ doesn't fit, the 1st patient dies, etc. I worked on a floor, and often was in charge of prepping the "backup" person. He/she would be totally prepped, family by his side, only to be sent home, when the first person was successful. I don't eveny anyone who has to work with these people as they wait their turn. Please people, talk to your family, donate your organs.

      --
      Save a Life. Donate Blood. Please.
    6. Re:i'm glad he's doing well but by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 5, Insightful
      In theory, the sickest person that is compatable is supposed to get the organ. In practice, being rich/famous probably gets you moved up a few places, witness Mickey Mantle and David Crosby, who both got liver's soon after their cases were wildly publicized. I think on the flip side, these very public cases help everyone, because more organs get donated.

      I think what would help even more would be if people like Mickey Mantle would die from not getting preferential treatment, just like thousands of normal people do every year. That way, the public would see that there is a need for livers, and not foolishly believe that everyone who needs a liver gets one within a few days.

      --
      I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
    7. Re:i'm glad he's doing well but by phritz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Um ... my only superstition about this is that if you sell your liver when you die, then only rich people with liver disease will get livers. Poor people with liver disease would have to go way into debt to purchase a free market liver ... or die.

  3. From all of us... by c0dedude · · Score: 3, Funny

    Get well soon!
    Sincerely,
    The Internet

    --
    Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
  4. Unbelievable that it's legal by AxelBoldt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find it utterly unbelievable that relatives of organ donors can designate a recipient. Only medical criteria should matter. Otherwise, people with the money/wit to start a public relations campaign will be more likely to get an organ. And all that without the approval of the donor! I know that I would have hated to find my liver in this guy.

    1. Re:Unbelievable that it's legal by dex22 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'm sorry you feel that way.


      This guy had two possible doners, critically ill in hospital. instead of hoping one dies, this guy was asking for public prayer and support for these people and their families. Now you might think he sucks because he asked for something and got it, but this man had a choice of Do This Or Die.


      I would be proud to have my liver in this guy. He respects human life.


      Note: He didn't upset the "level playing field" either. He was given low priority for a liver because of the nature of his illness. It's fairer to say he evened the playing field up a little.

    2. Re:Unbelievable that it's legal by andrews · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If I want to sell a kidney to the highest bidder I should be able to. If I'm dead, my will should be able to have my organs be auctioned off to benefit my family, or any other beneficiary.

      I own my body, and it's my property to do with as I like in life or death. Any law denying me this natural right is immoral.

    3. Re:Unbelievable that it's legal by stienman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the medical system starts to allow use of privately obtained or funded organs, then not only will people start selling their own organs - people will start selling other people's organs.

      Further, there is a good chance once that starts happening that 'bad organs' will get into the system. Yeah, it's great to get a liver - too bad you got a disease from it, or it doesn't work, etc.

      There may be ways to tighten the rules somewhat - but there are too many bad doctors out their, nevermind bad people, who will play along with the system and slip something through without following the rules.

      The idea that in order to give an organ you receive no monetary renumeration is a sound principle to prevent many problems.

      In the near future this may be relaxed as medical professionals are able to more easily test and identify problems with random organs that come in the hospital. Until then, though, this system works about as well as possible.

      There is very little information about this particular case, though, and I would like to know exactly how he jumped to the head of the list or dodged around it in order to get one sooner.

      -Adam

  5. And someone just woke up in an icy bathtub... by sdo1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I heard that it had something to do with someone getting drugged, passing out, and waking up in an icy bathtub. Really. My friend sent me an email about it.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
  6. So did he 'buy' his liver? by Phoenixhunter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The real question to ask here is whether or not such ad campaigns equate to 'buying' a liver through spending money on the advertisements? Could this be the next boon to advertisers?

  7. This is a good use of the web by ShatteredDream · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Things like this help to defeat the image of the web as the online wild west which makes it harder to lobby for fundamental changes to be forced on the architecture. Kinda hard to paint it as a force for "darkening our childrens' hearts" as Bush insinuated it often was in the 2000 election when it is being used effectively to save lives.

    1. Re:This is a good use of the web by kunudo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I bet someone else was first in line for that liver, and died. One mans life for anothers...

    2. Re:This is a good use of the web by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This also means, if you have money, you can go to the head of the line. Corrupting the other image of the "Web", as the Great Equalizer.

  8. what do you think? by osobear · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Capitalism at its finest, or semi-evil abuse of having money?

  9. Natural Selection? by CrystalArchangel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This seems to shout that those who are able to afford it, or able to come up with the best resources first, get the goods (a liver, in this case). So life and death quickly become a matter of being the cleverest.

    On that note, though, isn't that what natural selection, survivial of the fittest, is about? Those who are able to best take advantage of the situation to make out the best in the end.

    Still not sure I agree with it, however...

  10. Buying Life? by JollyRogerX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't everyone supposed to have an equal chance at getting an organ? Remember Mickey Mantle who pickeled his liver with many decades of hard alcohol? He got a liver ahead of many people then promptly died a few months later. I guess this just proves yet again that some people are more equal that others (namely those with money).

  11. This is wrong by pHatidic · · Score: 2

    On one hand, I am glad this man got his liver and was able to live. On the other hand, why did he have to choose clear channel billboards to advertise on? (see pic in CNN article).

  12. Similar Web projects by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 5, Informative

    While not as crucial as this one, I can think of two similarly novel uses of the Web to get what one wants.

    Karyn Bosnak was $20,000 in the hole and set up SaveKaryn.com. Within a few months she had paid off all her debts from the contributions of strangers. Now she's an author.

    Ramon Stoppelenburg wanted to travel around the world but had no money, so he started LetMeStayForADay.com, and managed to hitchhike around the world for a couple of years without spending a dime.

    I also seem to recall a far older site called 'Send Me A Dollar', but I don't have the URL to hand now. Does anyone know of any other people who've used the Web for interesting personal gain?

    1. Re:Similar Web projects by tyrantnine · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's rather mind blowing that with as many charities and truly good causes there are out there, people would actually send large sums of money to a random woman who just ran up her debt wildy. Never underestimate the stupidity of common folk, or why people SPAM the masses looking for suckers.

  13. I need a date! by Hypharse · · Score: 2, Funny

    So when are the first "I need a date" billboards from slashdot geeks going to appear? You can point it to your TomsADnDandStarwars.com fan page. The similarities are obvious. He only needed one liver, most geeks will settle for one girl. He needed a liver to keep on living, most geeks need one for bragging purposes at the next trekkie convention. Very similar.

  14. bad roy by Rumagent · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I want more life, f*cker"

    Bad taste I know, but I couldn't help thinking of the scene in Blade Runner, where Roy kills Tyrell.

  15. Was this ethical? by bstarrfield · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First, I'm glad that his life now has a higher probability of being saved. No transplant operation is a guarenteed success. He has a family who cares, he's young, and he deserves a chance.

    However, there is a great shortage of organ donors - many of whom are people who do not have access to the financial resources necessary to conduct such an impressive media campaign. Do these people have less of a right to survive? Unfortunately, the success of Todd's campaign will likely encourage future copycat media blitz's.

    Are we going to allow wealth to decide who live's or dies? Simple charisma, money, and good looks seem to be the factor which saved (hopefully) this fellows life. What do you say to the single teacher who needs a transplant? Sorry, you just have to wait your chance?

    If you want to make a difference for many people, sign your organ donor card, donate to the red cross, encourage stem cell research. And please, try to think of a better way to allocate organs than giving an organ to those who have the most money. I'm sorry that I'm harsh with this, but now someone else has been pushed farther down the line in the transplant list, and that person may not survive.

    --
    /* Dang, I can't type that well. */
    1. Re:Was this ethical? by jburroug · · Score: 2, Informative

      No I don't think it's ethical, nor do I think, as some posters are claiming, that this publicity is good for the organ donor system in general. What it does is it shows millions of people that the organ donor system is broken and that if you are in need of a replacement organ the only way to get one is by bypassing the established organ network in some way, if you can afford it. That is not a good thing.

      The rules that the organ networks use to determine who gets a donated organ and what priority are designed to make the best use of a very limited commodity. The idea is to match organs with people in the direst need and who have the best chances of long term survival after transplant. This approach maximizes the amount of additional "life" the donated organs contribute to society. Todd was lower on the list because the nature of his disease made him a poorer candidate for long term survival post transplant.

      So now this schmuck gets a healthy liver because some greiving, gullable family read the psalms on his web page and looked at his billboard and thought he was more deserving than the anonymous stranger whom medical science placed on the top of the transplant list. I think it's sad that people would choose to give such a gift to "that nice boy from the billboards" instead of to society at large.

      --
      "Listen: We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different!" - Kurt Vonnegut
  16. This inspired me by foidulus · · Score: 2, Funny

    to create my own website. I'm hoping donations will start flowing in any day now.....

  17. Don't get me wrong... by spacemen3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... I'm happy he's alright, and that the transplant was a success. However, what worries me is the number of people repeatedly passed-over for transplants based on questionable justification.

    Speaking from experience, the donation and subsequent dole-out process is supposed to be on a first-come-first-serve priority, based on compatibility and/or severity. Any attempts to get around this process are not only unfair for those that wait (painstakingly) in line, but also for the unfortunate soul that may have been bumped back a position in favour of the media-savvy Todd.

    Unfortunately we may never know their name, they did not invest in billboards or an online advertising campaign.

    I only hope that the next available donation arrived in time.

  18. Are you registered? by retostamm · · Score: 2, Informative
    CNN Article: As of July 30, there were 17,471 people nationwide waiting for a liver transplant. Last year, 5,671 liver transplants were performed in the country.

    Every year there are about 45'0000 deaths from Car accidents alone.

    Are you a registered Organ Donor?

    If more people would be registered, that waiting list would shorten dramatically in a year or two, and this guy would not have had to do this to stay alive.

    Or do you have other plans for your organs after you are dead?

  19. Ideas... by Gollum2001 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mental note: domains to register...

    Ineedakidney.com
    Ineedaheart.com
    Ineedabrain.c om ... mmm no, George Bush has that.

    (PD: Get well Todd, just joking).

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former" - Albert Einstein.
  20. http://www.TimesproutNeedsHalleBerry.com by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gotta be worth a try.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  21. You think it's so black and white? by Visceral+Monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As someone who is seperated by only one degree from Todd and his family (one of our best friends is also good friends with his wife) we've been following this for some time now. You can damm well bet that if it were my family or close friend, I wouldn't not hesitate to do the same thing they did. Only a fool would fail to capitalize on whatever assets they have in order to stay alive.

    --
    *Fortitudo, aequitas, fidelitas.*
  22. Jumping the queue? by InternationalCow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In a perfect world, there would be new organs for all who needed them. In the imperfect world that we have to live in, there are waiting lists. Todd jumped the queue, the donor's liver would otherwise have gone to the number one on the list. One life saved at the expense, possibly, of another. I wish Todd and his family all the best, but I have nagging doubts about the ethicality of this thing. The precedent it sets is potentially nasty. It reminds one of drowning men climbing on each other's shoulders to get to the surface, drowning those beneath them.

    --
    ----- One learns to itch where one can scratch.
  23. Before everyone cries foul play here... by gloth · · Score: 2, Interesting
    A lot of concerns have been raised on the legal and moral issues of this case, rightfully so, as I think, and many people believe that the high moral path would be to not allow anyone to bypass the national list. And that's a good point. But...

    But what if people do not agree with the way this list is handled? There can be very valid reasons, to disagree. Think about priorities. Everything else equal...

    • Should a sicker person have a higher priority? sounds good, but it also implies that healthier patients would have to wait till their healt deteriorates "enough", which somewhat perverts the whole thing.
    • Should people who are themselves registered as donors receive a higher priority as recipients? Seems only fair, or not? What if their religion does not allow it? And how do you avoid abuse?
    • I'm living in the US on a work visa right now, and am a potential donor (per driver license entry). Yet, on the other hand, there is a law that states that only something like 5% of organ donations can go to aliens. I, for one, don't think that's fair in my case.
    • ...

    Organ donations are a complex matter. Whatever the details, I believe that every patient has the right to come up with creative ideas to fight for his/her survival, and also that each donor has the right to decide what should be done with his/her organs; who else could have a higher right?

  24. Please take a moment to vist my site... by bobdotorg · · Score: 2, Funny

    www.BobNeedsADualG5PowerMac.org

    So how would that Janis Joplin song go in the internet age?

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
  25. Not out of the woods yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Despite a liver transplant the chances of long term survival (>5 years) is low for a patient with such a large tumor (~30%). Obviously, much better than not having had the transplant at all. Our prayers should go out to Todd and his family. Interestingly, some transplant centers do "split liver" transplants from a parent to a child, for example, with good success. A normal liver has tremendous proliferative potential and the donor's "half" liver returns to normal size in a few months. I don't think this works, however, when the recipient is an adult.

  26. This doesn't always work (billboards) by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Remember this guy?

    I have the feeling he's still quite single.

    Then there was "I bought too many shoes, give me $20,000" girl.. Karyn?

  27. This is the United States... by robochan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...where you also can't buy a baby

    but you can buy the sperm, you can buy the egg,
    and you can rent the uterus.

    --
    ...Rob
    The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
    1. Re:This is the United States... by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 2

      Hmmm...this begs a few [silly] questions...

      If you rent the uterus, do you have to be at least 25 years old?

      Is a major credit card required to secure the uterus?

      Does your uterus insurance policy cover rentals, or is it better to add on the $10 supplmentary uterine insurance coverage?

      Does it cost more to have more than one driver on the uterus rental?

      Can you get both in-town and one-way uterus rentals?

      What is the per/mile charge on the uterus?

      You guys don't use those damned uterus GPS tracking/monitoring units, right? To see if I ran the uterus hard and violated the uterine rental agreement?

      Finally -- what's the fee if I bring back the uterus a day late?

      IronChefMorimoto

  28. Living Unrelated Liver Transplants by luguvalium2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is cutting edge, but it is possible to do living unrelated liver transplants. The transplant clinic here in Richmond, Virginia ( Hume Lee Transplant Center ) has done about 60 in the past three years according to their web site. Several have been published in the local paper.

    In general, transplants from living volunteers have better results because the organ is away from a real blood supply for the shortest amount of time.

    I'm sure the transplant center Todd delt with had a medical reason to do what they did ( or possibly that is the only transplant his insurance would cover )

    7 years ago I received a kidney from my mom so I could live. Three months later my brother died suddenly and his tissued were used in transplants to others, so I am in a unique position to see both sides.

    I think that those who have complained that Todd "jumping the list" fail to see the point: There needs to be more organs available for transplant, better preventative health care to reduce the chance diseases don't destoy one's organs, and more research towards ways of improving transplantation, and alternatives to transplant ( for example: artificial hearts )

    Some places already have organ exchanges set up for kidney transplants so that if you have a member of the family that needs a kidney, and yours won't work, you can arrange to give yours to someone else and your relative gets bumped up the list. For example see .

    There is also Living Donors Online which seeks to coordinate living donors for kidneys, livers and bone marrow. There are many cases of people who donate even if they don't know someone who needs an organ, because they feel it's the right thing to do.

  29. Should I be selling my organs? by davidfromoz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I work in the medical industry and know it to be fully driven by the same financial considerations as most other industries.

    I am an organ doner, happily. I am an organ doner because I hope that if I die, my organs can be used to the most needy recipient. If they go to a person who has the cash to bend the rules, then I think they better just pay me or my family.

  30. Not religious by AxelBoldt · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Too bad they seem like a couple of religious nuts.

    Obviously, their religion was just a PR trick. Had they been true believing Christians, they could have saved themselves a lot of work and money: as Jesus said so eloquently in Mt 21:22 "And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive."

  31. Re:Hmm.. what to do with the domain name.. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Curiously, still available:
    • INeedAFootlongPenis.com


    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.