Slashdot Mirror


Enlightenment Lives

Anonymous Coward writes "The Enlightenment Project, far from dead, is pleased to announce the DR16.7.1 release of the Enlightenment Window Manager. With tons of fixes, a massive overhaul of the internals, and several new features this release is a must try for those who haven't run E in a long time. The window manager that redefined the way a desktop can look is still going strong."

44 of 339 comments (clear)

  1. cool to see it get fixes by quelrods · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's cool to see E is still alive. I've been using it as my wm for many years and haven't found anything else that does virtual desktops just the way I enjoy them. Does anyone know if they fixed the mozilla related focus bugs?

    --
    :(){ :|:&};:
    1. Re:cool to see it get fixes by daviddennis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I tried it years ago, when it was the new great thing, and was discouraged by the hideously difficult installation.

      I've pretty much replaced Linux with MacOS X (and I'm not the only one - I notice another similar reply already), but I would be curious to know if it's any easier to install than the old whole day or more nightmare where it seemed like you needed every library on the planet to get the thing working.

      D

    2. Re:cool to see it get fixes by AstroDrabb · · Score: 4, Insightful
      But why is it? All the X-WMs look shabby, slapdash and incomplete compared to MacOSX and even, dare I say it... WinXP.

      To be fair, I thing E does better than most... more attuned to my taste than KDE or GNOME. But why must we have hundreds of hours of development hours go into something which is inferior to the two market leaders? Sure there are Lunix/BSD vs Windows/Mac arguments/fests all time time, but no Linux/BSD WM looks or functions as polished as WinXP/MacOSX (note I am walking WM/GUI here, not OS in general).
      You are obviously stating your opinion, so why not make it sound that way? I think the default WinXP desktop is childish, though the Classic desktop on WinXP is nice and usable. As for Mac OS X, I have used it far too much, and don't like the GUI at all. I am dead tired of the over done theme, and can't stand every menu bar being at the top. I will take Gnome over Mac OS X any day, though that is _my opinion_.
      which is inferior to the two market leaders?
      Huh? What crack are you smoking? Max OS X is _not_ a market leader. There are some sources showing Linux desktop having a higher percentage then Max OS X as of December 2003. While others show Linux at around 1% or so and Mac OS X around 3%. No matter what source you take as gospel, Neither Linux nor Mac OS X are a _leader_ when it comes to the desktop. MS has that sealed. Now if you want to talk server. Well, Mac OS X is no where on the radar, while Linux is a _very_ strong second with MS in first, percentage-wise. Linux in fact has been the fastest growning server OS for the past 4 years or so, growing faster then any other OS, including MS Windows. So please don't call Mac OS X a "market leader" in any field, since Mac OS/X has always been and always will be a niche market.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    3. Re:cool to see it get fixes by BrokenHalo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Installing the new CVS stuff is a pain in the ass though.

      I can't say I'm a big fan of CVs, but I just downloaded and extracted all the source packages from Sourceforge, and a simple

      ./configure --prefix=/usr && make && make install

      was all I needed to do on my Slackware box. No problem.

    4. Re:cool to see it get fixes by displaced80 · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's it.

      Market research by drug pushers in the US discovered that 'Ecstacy' just wasn't catchy enough for users in the American market. After many focus groups were formed, it was decided to pro-actively radicalize the Ecstacy brand. In order to dynamically push the envelope of the established paradigm, it was decided to extreme-ify the Ecstacy brand by 73%.

      Thus, what Europe knows as Ecstacy or 'E' is called Xstacy or simply 'X'.

      Sadly, it means that by and large, the US missed out on the subtext of The Shamen's 1992 hit, "Ebeneezer Goode" -- "E's are good / E's are good / He's Ebeneezer Goode"

      ... this is so OT, I'm almost tempted to post anon. But what the hell. I bet there's not even enough people who remember The Shamen to mod me up....

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
  2. Glad to see it's still around by DLR · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I always thought Elnlightment was the most innovative WM I'd seen.

    --
    "Like fire and fusion, government is a dangerous servant and a terrible master."~RAH
    1. Re:Glad to see it's still around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It would work fabulously. This is exactally the kind of machine that E was designed on (it was mentioned in an article I read last week). So, it shouldn't be a problem at all. You could probably get away with taking it down to 128MB of ram if you really wanted to.

    2. Re:Glad to see it's still around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The theming can completly transform E's look. I've noticed alot of people say they're not too keen on the look - alot of people who use it are into dark/gothic themes. I actually wasn't too keen on the original default themes either. But there are literally hundreds of themes available, everything from dark/gothic to abstractly artististic to clean/bright themes.

      Chances are if you have a certain preference, then there are others who also have and have made a theme for it.

      I think one of E's primary motivations is to design a desktop that's not constrained in any way. Every piece is designed to be as customisable as possible - to leave the end choice about how the desktop should look to the user. Nice philosophy.

  3. Mirror...Kinda by matz62 · · Score: 5, Informative

    DR16.7.1 has been released!. This is the biggest release since DR16 first debuted! In this release dependencies have changed from Imlib/FreeType to Imlib2/FreeType2. The old default themes (which made the distribution almost 18M in size!) have been replaced with "Winter" by rephorm. The distribution has been split into 3 diffrent packages: programs (source), docs (Edox), and themes. A long long list of bugs have been fixed (including some very old nagging ones that weren't easy for kwo to squash). And probly of most interest to the end user: "Theme Transparency". Get the files source and RPMs in the usual place.

    If your wondering what happened to DR16.7.0, it was halted last minute by several bugs that were only reproducable by a small number of us but were major bugs none the less. You can see the changes since the initial release here.

    Ports for Solaris are avalible now and the DarwinPorts port is ready. Gentoo Portage will be updated shortly.

  4. sourceforge group by Coneasfast · · Score: 5, Interesting

    something interesting i noticed, the group_id on sf is 2, (is this the first sourceforge project ever?!?!)

    --
    Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    1. Re:sourceforge group by FuzzzyLogik · · Score: 4, Informative

      If I recall correctly Mandrake (of http://www.mandrake.net fame) worked with rasterman (of http://www.rasterman.com fame) at VALinux (the software area) long ago.. they've all parted ways from VALinux now. But since SF is run by VALinux these guys were some of the first to have access to it and all that. hence the group_id of 2 :-P I believe Rasterman worked for VA... but my brain is a little fuzzy

    2. Re:sourceforge group by Precision · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, back when we hacked up SF, Raster and Mandrake were just down the hall, so E became one of the first projects. IIRC mainly because at the time they were hosted on openprojects which was broken/down.

      --
      - U
    3. Re:sourceforge group by chrisd · · Score: 5, Informative
      Yeah, during the creation of SF, the team reserved 2 for Raster and Mandrake who were working at VA (in the disco room, don't ask) at the time.

      They didn't take posession for some time, as they resisted moving off their own hardware, but they eventually gave in.

      Chris DiBona

      --
      Co-Editor, Open Sources
      Open Source Program Manager, Google, Inc.
  5. i love E by OmniVector · · Score: 4, Funny

    i can't wait till it hits 1.0..

    --
    - tristan
  6. Re:Screenshots? by Myuu · · Score: 5, Funny

    nope, everyone is waiting for e17

    --

    forget it.
  7. Re:Gnome used to run E? by JakeThompson1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, GNOME once ran with Enlightement, then that was changed to Sawfish, and now we have the current Metacity.

    Though in reality, since all these are just window managers, you could replace them with anything you want.

  8. EFL and the road to E17 by DNAspark99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Anyone interested in what rasterman and crew have been up to should really check out and compile the EFL (Enlightenment Foundation Libraries)

    Some really neat stuff is on the way, of particular interest is the edje/evas/evoak stuff. Eventually this work will lead to an improved themeing system, for E and anything else that ties in to the EFL.
    Rasterman has even given a glimpse of the power these libs will bring to the programmer with his own version of a DVD player, using the EFL, in just 17 lines of code!

    so no, contrary to popular belief...E is NOT dead!

    --

    --
    Society has traditionally always tried to find scapegoats for its problems. Well, here I am.
    1. Re:EFL and the road to E17 by Carnildo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Rasterman has even given a glimpse of the power these libs will bring to the programmer with his own version of a DVD player, using the EFL, in just 17 lines of code!

      That's nothing. I'm sure a Perl hacker could do it in one line.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:EFL and the road to E17 by terraformer · · Score: 4, Informative

      You mean:
      $_='while(read+STDIN,$_,2048){$a=29;$b=73;$c=142;$ t=255;@t=map{$_%16or$t^=$c^=( $m=(11,10,116,100,11,122,20,100)[$_/16%8])$t^=(72, @z=(64,72,$a^=12*($_%16 -2?0:$m&17)),$b^=$_%64?12:0,@z)[$_%8]}(16..271);if ((@a=unx"C*",$_)[20]&48){$h =5;$_=unxb24,join"",@b=map{xB8,unxb8,chr($_^$a[--$ h+84])}@ARGV;s/...$/1$&/;$ d=unxV,xb25,$_;$e=256|(ord$b[4])

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
  9. Go Enlightenment! by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 3, Funny
    The Future of Window Managers...

    ...in 1996.

    --
    Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
  10. Re:Wow by reverius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I use iceWM as my only "desktop environment" (hahaha) on very new machines (my desktop is an Athlon XP 3000+). There's no reason to add bloat simply because your computer can handle it.

  11. E overdose! by ESqVIP · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone noticed the title of the song being played on this screenshot? (see the bottom right)

  12. Re:Be curious to find out if the code's any cleane by BJH · · Score: 3, Informative

    He's actually talking about Enlightenment. Alan Cox was heard to say that Rasterman is good at drawing pretty pictures, but as a programmer he makes a good plumber (or something to that effect - it's in one of the back issues of his Diary from 4 or 5 years ago).

  13. Re:Oh goody. by BJH · · Score: 3, Funny

    Keep it coming, I've got karma to burn.

    Enlightenment - the WM you run when your PC's too fast!

  14. Screenshots! by handy_vandal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where can I find screenshots of this new release?

    On the Enlightenment site, under "Screenshots".

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  15. Oh no! more memory wastage... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Enlightenment Foundation Libraries

    Sheesh, just great, a third set of graphical toolkits to load in memory for nothing... Like we didn't have enough waste of memory with Qt/kdelibs and GTK/Gnomelibs having to be both loaded in memory most of the time (who restricts his choice to either Qt programs or GTK programs, but not both?)

    Really, there are some times where the OpenSource approach to things isn't the right one. Sure choice of graphical toolkits is great, but do we look like stupids forcing users to have more memory to load several huge sets of similar libraries *just because* or what? I wish F/OSS folks decided to rally behind one and I'd happily follow, even if it wasn't my primary choice, for the sake of reducing the bloat...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Oh no! more memory wastage... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Add to this the fact that most people don't typically have a myriad of apps open at any given time;

      You just need one, say GIMP in KDE, and there you have megabytes of additional, functionally identical code loaded in memory for nothing.

      And you know what? even with 512M, when I edit really big images with GIMP, I need all the memory I can get. Memory isn't there for applications and libraries to waste as they please, it's supposed to be used for the data you create/manipulate.

      Many years ago, it used to be that memory taken by applications and the OS was minimal compared to your data, simply because it was vital. Now it's the other way round, because developers have gotten comfy with Moore's law. The problem is, code grows faster than Moore's law...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Oh no! more memory wastage... by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 4, Informative

      Seriously, if you don't like it, vote with your mindshare and your wallet.

      Want unix without the X hassle, the 4 different environments you need to run all the programs that you use, the different desktops, etc, etc, etc?

      BUY A MAC.

      Mac OS X is the only affordable commercial unix workstation. And as a bonus, it's based on FreeBSD (quite heavily) - which means almost any unix program will work on it with relative ease (mostly a compile) - and if you need X protocol support, you have that too, without the hassle.

      Use linux or FreeBSD on your server where you need the real horsies. Get an OS that's actually addressing your desktop needs for your workstation - and manages to support OSS as well; perhaps not in the way that some people here would like it, but it works for me.

    3. Re:Oh no! more memory wastage... by shadoi · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yes... the atrocious memory wastage, oh wait. WRONG. The complete core EFL is 1.3 MB (stripped).

      I know it's a concept that's hard to grasp, but actually looking at something and TRYING IT OUT before you critique it is usually a good idea.

      For those interested:
      http://enlightenment.org/pages/efl.html/
      http://enlightenment.org/pages/cvsnotes.html/

      Try out some of the cool apps people have started working on like:
      • entrance - EFL based Login Manager (gdm replacement)
      • engage - OS X-like dock with smooth scaling.
      • entice - EFL based image viewer.
      • evidence - File manager with TONS of features.

      Go to the main enlightenment.org page and CVS for lots more...

      --
      -- "Chaos often breeds life, when order breeds habit." -Henry B. Adams
    4. Re:Oh no! more memory wastage... by nanoakron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who the fuck thinks this is +5 Insightful?

      It's just the insight you'd expect from combining an arrogant linux zealot who doesn't care about product coalescence to reduce redundancy with a bloated american 'honey, let's take the SUV to the ATM tonight' approach to the world.

      Beautiful to see in all its unadulterated corpulence.

      -Nano.

  16. Re:My first window manager by daeley · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hey, load up Fink and you can have Enlightenment on your Powerbook. Or any of a bunch of other window managers.

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  17. Re:It looks cool but by iNiTiUM · · Score: 4, Informative
    I've been using E for a few years now. Its easily the coolest window manager around if you've got some RAM to spare. Its easy to use, extremely customizable, and can be themed to hell and back. The eye candy is a bonus, but the handling of virtual/multiple desktops is amazing and does wonders for productivity (think about the first time you used tabbed browsing).

    As for reasons to use it?
    Well lets see....

    The themes change not only the look, but the functionality and behaviour. (See the Aqua themes)

    Window Grouping

    Virtual/Multiple Desktops (Yes, there is a difference)

    More options than you can shake a /. troll at

    Easy to use

    I could go on, but I really hate telling people why they should use a product. Since you had the motivation to ask, find some motivation to try it out. Most people that have the patience to tune E to their liking will never go back to anything else. If they do, its usually to a minimalist WM like ratpoison or fluxbox (both ends of the scale I suppose). If you don't think its worth your time to enhance your productivity, then stick with what you know. Otherwise, give it a shot and be prepared to get lost in the immense selection of themes!

    --
    When encryption is outlawed, ou++1!@(93j++js-d9298yIUH(*Y24JKB!~
  18. Re:It looks cool but by quantaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...I prefer to just stick to one thing that works, not waste my time going to the next coolest looking display manager. It needs to be rather revolutionary to get my attention. So why should I try it?

    So don't, I'm guessing they won't really miss you anyways and if you don't want to go through the effort (somewhat nontrivial) of trying it out then don't. Then again what do you mean by "works"?

    There are a lot of people using windows, most are not going to switch to linux anytime soon because for them windows "works", of course they still have all the trouble with spyware, viruses, no multiple desktops, etc, but they say it "works". Same with IE, they figure it "works" and don't even consider activeX wonkyness or tabbed browsing (don't know what SP2 has done for this). So at what point does your window manager "work"? When it compiles? When it has no bugs? When it has nothing you can point to from your dialy usage and say "that's a bug"? Maybe when annoying UI issues are gone? I figure the only way a program is ever truly done is if it does everything you've ever wanted it to do as simply and efficiently as possible. So if you want to put in the effort to see what you might be missing from your window manager that "works" go ahead and try it out. I can tell you that I'm certainly not going to try it out today (heck probably won't even RTFA) but sometime later when I have some time to spare, maybe days, maybe weeks, maybe never, who knows, I might just give it a whirl.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  19. Re:E redefined the desktop? by matusa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your statements are quite rude. For some reason, following gnome's irritation with imlib, bashing raster came into style. But that is another tale.

    E had fully themed widgets, both for window manager utilities and the decorations themselves. Shortly thereafter I saw this creeping into other window managers and toolkits, and then windows and macs both unofficially and officially began carrying similar flexible interface enhancements. As far as this unparalleled flexibility, E _was_ the first, and the pattern I just described is no coincidence--the influence was definitely there to a not insignificant extent.

    raster's a nice and very enthusiastic guy, dedicated and ambitious. Take a look at E17 if you have a moment.

    (note zealotry is not the aim here--E is not even my primary; simply I hate this damned bashing)

  20. E will need KiKaZ themes! Calling all skinners! by Provocateur · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The last theme I installed on E16.4 was 23 oz of glass, it's like having a Mac face on a Linux box. Have ripples running on a 4x1 desktop on a lo-spec Thinkpad, with enough resources left to loop my favorite trailers to the tune of techno.

    Pixelmoose if you're listening, don't forget to a)port your theme to E16.7.1 b) make a 23oz of glass xmms skin...

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  21. Never could get into it by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This isn't a troll, or at least it's not meant as one, but try as I might, I could never get into using Enlightenment. And from the fact that Gnome and KDE get the majority of the press/developers/software, I'm guessing I'm not alone in this impression.

    Don't get me wrong: Enlightenment is certainly a powerful and capable windowing system, and there have been some fairly original looks/themes released for it, but, to me at least (he says, carefully circumventing the Troll under the bridge) it's not a GUI that a new user coming from the Windows/Mac/KDE/Gnome world can immediately begin using. Or configuring.

    (This is where all the Slashdot/Linux "elite" begin to quote my thread for their 'RTFM', and 'How could it be any simpler than xxxx?' responses)

    When I first began investigating Linux all those years ago, Enlightenment themes and screenshots were all the rage. KDE and Gnome were promising, but Enlightenment was how all the coolest geeks seemed to produce such cool eye candy-based desktops. But to a Linux newbie like me, coming from an Amiga/Dos/Windows background at the time, it was totally alien. It was just too much to have to begin learning Linux, and a totally different GUI like Enlightenment, both at the same time. So Enlightenment went goodbye after way too many wasted hours trying to become productive and look good doing it.

    So flash ahead several years (last year, to be exact), and a much more Linux-savy version of Me decided to give Enlightenment shot again. I hadn't kept up with it, and had meanwhile become an avid KDE fan, but I wanted to try something different, and figured that Enlightenment had to have matured by this time, to a point wherein I could grasp it easier. I mean... KDE had came so far in this time.

    So I boot it up after installing the latest version, and ,after booting, am faced with the identical look and feel of the last time I used it. Nothing (on the surface, at least) had changed! No icons... Just a couple of odd, pager-like boxes.

    Now... I'm not expecting enlightenment to change their way and become KDE or Gnome or anything. But they've gotta realize that virtually any converts to their window manager will be coming from an environment such as KDE, Gnome, Windows, etc. It's a totally different methodology from that of Enlightenment. You'd think that one of the first things that you'd see on a default desktop would be a "how to get started" type of document.

    Yeah, yeah... I know. RTFM. Yes, I also know that I can configure Enlightenment to look and interact like whatever I want it to, but I'd kind of expect "something" to push the new user in the right direction.

    But other things were not impressive also. Fonts, in paricular, looked poor when compared to the more popular window managers around.

    So flash foward to todays announcement here on Slashdot, and so I decide to take a look at Enlightenments page to see if anything's changed yet. I see this. Come on... For crying out loud, someone get Enlightenment a PR director. If the programmers hope to grow the userbase of their window manager, they really should make it a bit more accessible. If an "intro level" of usability isn't a possibility, then how about a simple "Introduction to Enlightenment" document, or walk through? Something to offer the new user a glimpse of the power of Enlightenment. And without requiring them to hunt it down, or surf out to a website.

    At least make the default font's look better. This is a good example of both the default look of Enlightenment, and it's default fonts. Conversely, this is the default look of KDE. I'm not saying that KDE's superior (to me it is, but who cares), but the default look, which all of us have seen many times before, and consi

    1. Re:Never could get into it by topher1kenobe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've used E for a long long time. I don't use gnome or kde because they LOOK heavy. The bars, the widgets, everything feel fat.

      As far as I'm concerned, E is perfect the way it is. I couldn't care less if there's never another release. I couldn't care less if no-one else ever uses it.

      It's fast, stable, powerful, flexible, and pretty. No, it's not for people who don't like to tweak. I like to tweak. Gnome and KDE are for those who just want to get work done, and not mess around on their computer. I like to mess around with it, make it stand up and talk (I have a COOL computer ;) ).

      So really, if you don't like it, don't use it. Don't tell anyone else to use it. Tell people other things are better. I really don't mind in the slightest.

      --

      yadda

    2. Re:Never could get into it by Mornelithe · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to the text of the article, they switched the default theme to winter, so it looks more like this by default. Those screenshots on the E website are (if you look close) from E 16.0, and this is 16.7.

      Also, I don't know what you heard, but E16 is just a window manager, like Fluxbox or KWin or Metacity. It isn't an never was trying to be a whole desktop environment. In fact, it used to be the default window manager for Gnome before Sawfish replaced it.

      In other words, if you want panels and desktop icons and stuff, then you need to run Gnome or KDE with Enlightenment as the window manager, or you need to use iDesk or something like that to provide that extra functionality. E by itself is closer to the minimalist window managers.

      E17 will be more like Gnome, KDE or XFCE, but that's been years in the making and may yet be years before it's released. But E16 was never trying to be like that. What you're doing is sort of like complaining that Fluxbox doesn't do everything that KDE does. E isn't designed to do fancy stuff out of the box and be GUI configurable in all aspects. That's what KDE and Gnome are for.

      --

      I've come for the woman, and your head.

  22. cheaky E crew... by apachetoolbox · · Score: 3, Funny

    I had just settled for a quiet night, just me, the fags, the vodka...

    I never knew!

  23. now in portage by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 4, Informative

    Gentoo users, this is now in portage.

    PCB

  24. Standard Gentoo "Don't use ACCEPT_KEYWORDS" post. by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't use ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86", use Mr. Dodd's other suggestion, /etc/portage/package.keywords instead. If you do use ACCEPT_KEYWORDS, and do something like "emerge -D", it will attempt to "upgrade" all of the dependencies of that package...

  25. Best of both worlds by Dhrakar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    :-) I use both. I have Enlightenment set as my X11 window manager for 10.3 and it works really well (via Fink).

  26. This guy really does go back by zapp · · Score: 3, Funny

    He's got a 2 digit ID!

    --
    no comment
  27. Evidence - the enlightenment file manager by kris · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is also Evidence, the enlightenment file manager. See the Screen Shots and download the release.