Slashdot Mirror


New Solution For Your Transistor BBQ

servantsoldier writes "There's a new solution for the transistor heat problem: Make them out of charcoal... The AP is reporting that Japanese researchers, led by Daisuke Nakamura of Toyota Central R&D Laboratories Inc., have discovered a way to use silicon carbide instead of silicon in the creation of transistor wafers. The Japanese researchers discovered that they can build silicon carbide wafers by using a multiple-step process in which the crystals are grown in several stages. As a result, defects are minimized. Other benefits are decreased weight and a more rugged material. The researchers say that currently only a 3" wafer has been produced and that a marketable product is at least six years away."

35 of 191 comments (clear)

  1. Sigh, i must be really tired. by Baka_kun · · Score: 4, Funny

    the text said "... that Japanese researchers, led by Daisuke Nakamura of Toyota Central R&D Laboratories Inc., ..."

    but i read "...that Japanese researchers, led by Duke Nukem of Toyota Central R&D Laboratories Inc., ..."

    other than this, Great, if this works in practice well be having new smaller cpus for everything.

    but im still waiting for a pda without screen, that uses my glasses as a screen.. but thats more of scifi than reality.

    1. Re:Sigh, i must be really tired. by Nermal6693 · · Score: 2, Funny

      but im still waiting for a pda without screen, that uses my glasses as a screen.. but thats more of scifi than reality.

      Making glasses into a screen is the easy part. The hard part is making them look like ordinary glasses, rather than a big sign proclaiming 'GEEK!'

    2. Re:Sigh, i must be really tired. by 1010011010 · · Score: 4, Interesting


      Silicon Carbide does work -- Cree, Inc. of Durham, NC has been manufacturing electronics (particularly blue LEDs) for years using silicon carbide as the substrate. The technology was developed at NC State University, as I recall.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  2. Finally... Heat can be put to good use by chatgris · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This may be modded as funny.. But realistically, think about this.

    The amount of heat being generated by chips does not seem to be decreasing at all, and this material appears to be produced to be "heat resistant" instead of more efficient.

    How long until your PC puts out enough heat that it would be economical to re-use that heat for a hot water tank, or for winter heating?

    How long until we need special 240V plugs like electric stoves have for power?

    I think that emphasis on more efficient chips is a better venture than heat resistant materials, as the whole heat byproduct of CPU's seems to be sprialling out of control.

    Josh

    --
    Open Your Mind. Open Your Source.
  3. Charcoal? by mikeophile · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Think knife-sharpener.

    Silicon carbide is really hard stuff.

    It's not quite diamond, but with a hardness of 9.25, you could use your SiC processor to grind real axes and not just figurative ones in flamewars.

    1. Re:Charcoal? by DarkMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not quite.

      I've got a quitea bit of experience with SiC abrasives, what with the materials engineering and being a bit of a lapidary.

      First off, it's nowhere near diamond in terms of hardness. The Mohs scale is semi-arbitary in assignement, and not even vaugely linear. On proper hardness scale (in this case Vickers), diamond has a hardness of around 90 GPa, compared to about 25 GPa for SiC. That's the reason I've got a box full of diamond abrasives, despite the cost (about 30 times more expensive), they are much faster, and last almost indefinitly. More later on this.

      Secondly, SiC needs to be rough. If you don't belive me, try grinding a carrot into shape on a window. The glass is very much harder then the carrot, but is nearly perfectly smooth, and as such, the carrot just sides about. Compare with rubbing the carrot on something like a concrete paving slab, which grinds it much better. The reative hardnesses are wrong here, but show the need for surface roughness.

      As an aside, if you think that paper cuts are bad from standard office paper, then try getting one from fine SiC abrasive paper. Stiffer paper, cuts deeper, and the abrasive roughs up one side of the cut, so it takes about four times as long to heal. It's a mistake I've made exactly once.

      A processor is not a single pure material - if it was, it wouldn't do anything. They are a complex layered system, with layers of copper and SiO. Trying to grind anything with a processor die will just succed in scraping off all that important stuff. The hardness of SiO is Mohs 7, well below that of anything actually used as an abrasive for metals. (It's the same as ground glass, near enough, sometimes used for abrading wood or plastics).

      For comparison silicon has a hardness of 12 GPa Vickers. SiC is only around twice as hard as that.

      So, no, you can't really use it as an abrasive. If you really want to be very careful, you might be able to use the edge of the die as a scraper, but you'd probably just remove the important stuff.

      That's alla moot point, however. I strongly supect that you'll never see the actuall die, it will be under a metal heat spreader. Because they can cope with higher temperatures [0], there is even less need to take the risk of mishandling breaking the die.

      And lest you think that SiC would be less likely to break then silicon, I'm afraid not. Aside from the fact that many broken Athlons are due to the top few layers of SiO and metal breaking, SiC is not that tougher than silicon. As any lapidary will tell you, it's perfectly possible to chip saphire and diamond, if you're not careful.

      Still, I can't deny that facts aside, it's a wonderfuly evocative metaphor.

      [0] And how much higher! Silicon tops out at 350 C, SiC could operatate at 600 C, where is it glowing red hot! sourced from Nasa

  4. In Japan... by Johnny+Fusion · · Score: 5, Funny
    The researchers say that currently only a 3" wafer has been produced

    Hirohito: Oh! You must have very big wafer!

    Owner: Excuse me?! I was just asking you what you're up to with this manufacturing process!

    Nothing! We are very simple people with very small wafer! Mr. Hosek's wafer is especially small!

    Hosek: He he he! So small!

    Hirohito: We cannot achieve much with so small wafer! But, you Americans! Wow! Wafer so big! SO BIG Wafer!

    Owner: Well, I-I guess it is a pretty good size

    --
    There are two kinds of fool. One says, This is old, and therefore good. And one says, This is new, and therefore better.
  5. typical bad science journalism by harlemjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the article....
    In an advance that could lead to lighter spacecraft and smarter cars, researchers have developed a new technique for producing a high-quality computer chip that is much more resistant to extreme conditions than the silicon found in most of today's electronics.

    So a chip more resistant to extreme conditions is also somehow 'lighter' and 'smarter'...

    A good step forward for science, but not for science journalism...

    --
    shooting is not too good for my enemies
    1. Re:typical bad science journalism by mikeophile · · Score: 5, Informative

      The chip itself isn't lighter, but the cooling equipment required can be much smaller, making for much lighter and rugged devices that use those chips.

      But yeah, that article was pretty light on details.

  6. Charcoal processors? by gatesh8r · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gives new meaning to "burning up your CPU". Better hope the non-techies never open up their machines...

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  7. Re:how hot? by struppi · · Score: 2, Informative
  8. Re:I for one... by bm_luethke · · Score: 3, Funny

    Briquette's? A true geek would realise that the chunk charcoal overlord is vastly superior in flavor, heat, cleanup, and ability to lead the masses.

    --
    ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
  9. Re:Wow by Stripe7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Developments like this in Japan and other countries tell me the the US not losing its technological edge it has already lost it. Japan patents brand new tech like this while in the US we patent SUDO and 1 click shopping.

  10. Six years away? Super! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny
    I'll be able to use these in my flexible paper display ebook with fuel cell technology as I drive to work in my hydrogen powered flying car!

    I can't wait!

  11. Next step: diamond by CityZen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you've got the carbon, why bother with the silicon? Actually, I wonder what they use to "dope" diamond semiconductors?

    http://www.eetimes.com/at/hpm/news/OEG20030822S000 5

  12. Re:Finally... Heat can be put to good use by spellraiser · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, but I still think water cooling is the way to go, personally.

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
  13. Re:Finally... Heat can be put to good use by ozbird · · Score: 2, Informative

    The amount of heat being generated by chips does not seem to be decreasing at all ...

    I disagree. I've just upgraded an Athlon XP 1800+ system to an Athlon64 3500+.
    The new box runs around 20 degrees C cooler than the old one at idle and under heavy load; both use the supplied retail AMD heatsinks. I'm not using "Cool 'n Quiet" on the '64; it might take a bit off the idle temperature, but I don't see the point.

  14. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I live in Japan and work for a Japanese company. Trust me, stupid business process patents are not unique to the U.S. Our company has attempted (sometimes successfully) to patent some of the most obvious, blatant crap by tagging "online" onto it. AND WE'RE NOT EVEN A TECH COMPANY!!

    In the event that we find out that someone else already HAS "invented" this idea, it is usually NTT (Nippon Telephone and Telegraph) which has also registered the hell out of a shit load of trademarks that it doesn't use.

    And, over here, there are a lot of people worried that we've really lost our tech edge against China and Taiwan. To a certain extent, I think they're right. China and Taiwan used to be copiers, not innovators. But then again, so was Japan half a century ago. Recently, China and Taiwan have started innovating too. It should have been obvious that they "could" innovate, about 18 years ago when the first fake Nintendo consoles from Taiwan were found. They say over 80% of the circuitry, including the CPU, was original, and not a copy. (Then again, a lot of the fake Apple IIe machines back then were pretty original too, sometimes with features that weren't available on the real thing!)

  15. Steve Jobs it coming! by ArcticCelt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Steve Jobs when asked what's next for the iPod:

    "You know, our next big step is we want it to make toast," Jobs answered. "I want to brown my bagels when I'm listening to my music."

    Damn Steve, again, he saw this charcoal technology coming before anybody. :)

    --

    Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
  16. What does silicon carbide have to do with a BBQ? by Jason1729 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Silicon carbide is a very hard, brittle material with a very high melting point commonly used to make crucibles and high speed saw blades and drill bits.

    Comparing this to charcol is like saying that Carbon Monoxide is the same thing as Oxygen because CO contains oxygen.

    Jason

  17. Re:Wow by Donny+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Before, Taiwan (or Japan) would do just fine by making the same thing cheaper, now that doesn't quite cut it any more.

    Necessity ... I'd say that overall, the ability to innovate is inversely proportional to well-being of individuals.

    Money-hungry folks from India and China should out-innovate equally smart people from other countries, just because they're trying harder.

    In some ways, I think social injustice is perhaps a motivating factor, too - unless you come up with something new, it's hard to make it to the top by hard work alone.

  18. Re:a good idea? by jimicus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No you won't. Can you imagine Compaq, Dell or IBM voluntarily producing a PC which never wears out?

  19. All this silly stuff, but by panurge · · Score: 5, Informative
    Silicon carbide and diamond both have significant potential use as power semiconductors. Forget CPUs, think I/O. Think smaller power supplies, smaller audio drivers, more rugged automotive systems, and, ultimately, being able to shrink robotics controllers as a next step to producing very small robots. If a robot's motors are running at 80C, you want the power semis to be able to handle that. Furthermore, a lot of possible fuel cell designs run at fairly high temperature and, again, you want the electronics to survive the environment without too much cooling.

    There are also huge potential benefits for rad-hard communications satellites, where cooling is a major problem (radiation only.)

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  20. Re:a good idea? by Y2K+is+bogus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So the major PC makers wouldn't want to make products that never fail and never require spare parts, except due to catastrophe?

    Producing spares isn't their primary focus, and every RMA for stupid broken stuff is costly. A laptop that exceeds the 3 year warranty without breaking would be music to their ears, and consumers.

    Your logic is flawed. It isn't "wearing out" that makes people buy new computers, it's the fact that it's too slow or old. Most computers end up surplused, just check the HUGE secondary market that feeds many multi-million dollar surplus businesses. There are a handful of long time surplus shops in Silicon valley that have derived a long history from the computing industry around here.

  21. What about electrical properties? by Hank+the+Lion · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's very nice that SiC can withstand high temperatures and is very hard, but are these the most important features of a semiconductor material?
    I would be more interested in band gap voltage, electron/hole mobility etc.
    Who needs a chip that can run hot when it cannot run fast?
    Maybe for specialized hardened aplications like space, but I don't see these being used for mainstream applications.

  22. The BBC article by Mixel · · Score: 3, Informative
  23. U lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ha you lot, you think this will be used for CPU's.

    It wont. Silicon/Germanium is fastest you can get at teh mo (until they can dope diamond)

    SiC will be used in hi-temp areas (eg aircraft engines) or where they want it to run hotter to up the current handling (ie power electronics)

    at the mo I am limited to 800A at 1200V for an IGBT and that is 8IGBT die in parallel.the die is limited to 100A at 125C.

    When I get SiC IGBT I will be able to pass 800A thorugh a single die and let the die heat up to 300C.

    This will mean that expensive heavy heatsinks will be able to shrink

    SiC will NOT be use for hi speed CPU!!!

  24. update your calendar by rozz · · Score: 2, Funny
    "The researchers say that currently only a 3" wafer has been produced and that a marketable product is at least six years away."

    duplicate /. article incoming ... estimated period of arrival: 6 years later .. please update your calendar for Aug2010

    --
    "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
  25. Re:Finally... Heat can be put to good use by dwhitman · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The amount of heat being generated by chips does not seem to be decreasing at all, and this material appears to be produced to be "heat resistant" instead of more efficient.

    Heat resistance isn't the point -- current IC's don't melt, they get trashed via difusion processes that will still be there in SiC.

    The advantage of SiC is substantially enhanced (2x) thermal conductivity vs. Si. This makes it easier to get heat out of the chip, allowing it to run cooler at any given heat production rate.

  26. Cooler != less heat produced by EnglishTim · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just because your CPU runs cooler does not neccesarily mean it generates less heat. To do a proper test, use the heatsink supplied for use with your Athlon 1800+ and pop it on your Athlon64...

    It's possible all you've proved is that coolers are getting better quicker than processors are getting hotter...

  27. The good news, the bad news.... by mikael · · Score: 4, Funny

    The good news, your graphics card can be overclocked to 2 Terahertz, and still remain operational at over 650C.

    The bad news, is that the aluminum casing of your PC will melt at this temperature, so your PC will need te be built from titanium.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  28. Read the post again by panurge · · Score: 2, Informative
    80C is a realistic maximum case temperature for DC motors, which I used as an example. If the environment reaches 80C, what do you think the junction temperatures of the transistors will be?

    Also, please note that the junction temperatures you quote are maxima. You will not get good life at high temperatures with silicon but, more importantly, the ability to handle pulses and voltage drops as junction temperature rises. I suggest you look at the SOAR curves for a few power devices to see what I mean.

    As for the rest of your remarks, it's clear you are not a serious power electronics designer. No-one says the low level stages have to run that hot (though anyone who has listened to a good tube amp would probably argue that you are exaggerating the importance of shot noise). The big benefit of higher junction temperatures is that heatsinks, in particular, can be smaller, especially if the hot air is vented straight out of the casing. This makes the overall size of the equipment smaller.

    Also, don't forget that power amplification is not synonymous with hi-fi. There are many applications for power audio devices (PA systems, for instance) that require considerable audio power but only moderate quality, and the applications for compact RF devices are continually expanding. For instance, one possible goal for a high power SiC device would be a replacement for the magnetrons of microwave ovens, possibly even creating a market for small solar or wind powered microwave ovens that would be useful both for backpackers and for 3rd world countries.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  29. Still not the solution by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, silicon carbide and water cooling will get the heat out of the CPU faster.

    The problem still remains that a metric buttload of heat is produced, and that it comes out of the electricity bill. Sometimes twice: in the summer you also pay for the air conditioning, since that shiny new CPU is heating the room some more.

    I think it's getting ludicrious.

    The Prescott is already over 100 W, and Intel apparently plans dual core versions. Whoppee for 200+ W CPUs. NVidia 6800 Ultras are rated for 120 W, and they're hyping SLI setups now. Yep, _two_ graphics cards, if just 120W worth of hot air blowing off the back of the case wasn't enough.

    Add hard drives, motherboard, and the PSUs own inefficiency, and you're already looking at 1000W worth of heat for the whole computer. That's already like a space heater.

    In fact, go ahead and turn a space heater on near your desk in the summer, and you've got a pretty good approximation of what the next generation of computers promises to be like. Now picture some 4 of them in the same room, at the office.

    And it's raising exponentially. Carbide and water cooling will only help them get further along that curve.

    And I'll be damned if I'm thrilled at the prospect.

    This also brings the problem of even more fans. Even with water cooling, you then have to get the heat out of the water. It still means fans. More heat will just mean more fans, bigger fans, or faster fans. Or all the above.

    And I'm not thrilled at the prospect of the return of the noisy computer either. I can jolly well do without the machine sounding like a jumbo jet. Especially when I'm watching a DVD or such, I can do without having to turn the volume sky high just to be able to hear what they're saying. And at the office I can do without four noisy hovercrafts in the same room.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Still not the solution by yourmom16 · · Score: 2, Funny
      The problem still remains that a metric buttload of heat is produced

      I've never been able to figure out how many libraries of congress a metric buttload is.

      --
      "We have got to make Stan understand the importance of voting, because he'll definitely vote for our guy." - South Park
  30. Re:Charcoal? Isn`t a bit hard to saw wafer? by DarkMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nah, you just use a diamond saw. Same as for the silicon wafers. It's conceptually the same thing as a very thin diamond tipped grinding wheel, and it grinds a cut through the material. You can also use a diamond encrusted wire as a saw, like, erm, this one *holds one up*, but they are much slower, and only really good as hand saws, or for chopping thin sheets [0].

    It's going to be a little slower, as SiC is about twice as hard as silicon, but that's not going to slow it down that much. Diamond saws are also used to chop up boules of sapphire and ruby, which are of similar hardness to SiC (a little softer), and also diamond (harder), so it's no big techical problem.

    Or, a laser. A nice big excimer laser would slice it neater than a diamond saw. With the improved surface texture after cutting, the decrease is polishing coupled with the increase in hardness might make it worth while. Probably not, though.

    [0] I use my saw for cutting rocks for lapidary purposes, principly quatrz of various sorts.