Slashdot Mirror


"E-Jihad" Exaggerated by Russian Media Spin

decompiler writes "Earlier reports that cyber-terrorists would be bringing down the internet today have now been denounced as "Russian media sensationalist spin", and Jose Nazario of Arbor Networks says, "There have been no precursors to a large-scale attack.""

29 of 244 comments (clear)

  1. They lied to us! by chrispyman · · Score: 5, Funny

    And I used to figure, if it's on the internet it must be true! There goes that theory...

    1. Re:They lied to us! by Three+Headed+Man · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would have thought we'd have a "NO CARRIER" joke as the first post for sure.

      --
      I'm probably at the karma cap. Mod up a funny troll instead, it lightens the mood :)
    2. Re:They lied to us! by timeOday · · Score: 5, Funny

      A false alarm? Have you no appreciation for the dedicated security professionals who exposed and headed off the conspiracy? The complete lack of destruction only testifies to our brilliance and validates our security plan, bow down before us!!!

  2. "E-Jihad"? by grunt107 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like a "E-Jihadn't"

    1. Re:"E-Jihad"? by druhol · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hell, all we'd have to do is link the terrorist's site on the front page. Puny little ISP wouldn't stand a chance.

      --
      WWD4D?
  3. Two things you usually don't see together by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 5, Funny

    News Media

    and

    Exaggerated

    1. Re:Two things you usually don't see together by samsmithnz · · Score: 3, Funny

      and

      FOX

    2. Re:Two things you usually don't see together by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's some sort of strange comfort in knowing that the American media is not alone in this sort of behavior, at least.

      Oh, who am I kidding, journalism as a profession is doomed. They may as well just give out degrees in "reporting sensationalist nonsense" and be done with it.

  4. ISC Handlers put it best by UnderAttack · · Score: 4, Funny

    From yesterday's
    Diary:
    "The ISC would like to go out on a limb and predict that the Internet will not vaporize into a cloud of nothingness this Thursday, but if it does, it's been our pleasure to help stave off its inevitable annihilation this long. "

    --
    ---- join dshield.org Distributed Intrusion Detec
  5. oh crap by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 5, Funny

    I took work off today because I thought the internet was gonna go down. I didn't mention my absence to any of my supervisors, because I figured they would all be freaking out because the internet is down so they wouldn't notice I was missing.

    I should either:
    A) Go to work.
    B) Bring in some pruning shears and re-create the effect of the internet being down on a much more local scale by severing the fiber line.

    Where are those shears at?

  6. Ahem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Jose Nazario of Arbor Networks says, "There have been no precursors to a large-scale attack."

    Except maybe for a couple of russian jetliners going down simultaneously out of the same airport.

    1. Re:Ahem... by druhol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right. Because that has such a massive effect on internet security.

      --
      WWD4D?
  7. Obligatory... by CaptainPuff · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Mother Russia, the Internet attacks you....
    wait a minute... my box gets port probed all day and I'm not even in Russia. grrrrrrrr

    1. Re:Obligatory... by Stevyn · · Score: 5, Funny
      my box gets port probed all day

      It's nice to see woman visit this site, but please keep those details to a minimum.

  8. E-Terror Level by johnkoer · · Score: 5, Funny

    The E-Terror level has subsequently been lowered to #FFFF00

  9. they already struck by theMerovingian · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
  10. E-slam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is e-jihad a characteristic of the E-slam faith?

  11. Ha! by east+coast · · Score: 4, Funny

    I knew it was just a big lie... There was no way those cowards were going to sd #4f d# $ i%5@

    NO CARRIER

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  12. I know why by StevenHenderson · · Score: 5, Funny

    They were going to launch the attack, but the amazing security of XP SP2 has made potential victims impenetrable fortresses!

    1. Re:I know why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually SP2 was the threat they were referring to

  13. Bright side by metlin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, look at the bright side. The fact that a lot of the news sources had denounced this as bullshit for the most part, and even made fun of it - is something positive.

    A while ago, something like this would have been treated a whole lot more seriously - the fact that people (especially some of the media) are realizing not all of the stuff that comes on the net needs to make sense is a slight silver lining :)

  14. Oh Man by quaketripp · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet Al Gore is releived to hear is was a hoax, his baby was in jeopardy.

  15. Wait just a minute! by cephyn · · Score: 3, Funny

    You mean to tell me that the thing that, according ot the media, "may or may not happen" didn't actually happen?

    So in that case, the media was right. Why are we upset with them?

    I think I may or may not get back to work now. Hey, at least I'm not lying.

    --
    Moo.
  16. What?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Next thing you know, we're going to find out Iraq didn't have any WMDs. It's almost as if somebody actually BENEFITS from creating unsubstantiated media scares. Anyway, I gotta get back to duct taping my windows.

  17. e-jihad.com by acceleriter · · Score: 5, Funny

    The data in Register.com's WHOIS database is provided to you by
    Register.com for information purposes only, that is, to assist you in
    obtaining information about or related to a domain name registration
    record. Register.com makes this information available "as is," and
    does not guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a WHOIS query, you
    agree that you will use this data only for lawful purposes and that,
    under no circumstances will you use this data to: (1) allow, enable,
    or otherwise support the transmission of mass unsolicited, commercial
    advertising or solicitations via direct mail, electronic mail, or by
    telephone; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
    that apply to Register.com (or its systems). The compilation,
    repackaging, dissemination or other use of this data is expressly
    prohibited without the prior written consent of Register.com.
    Register.com reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.
    By submitting this query, you agree to abide by these terms.

    Organization:
    mubahela.net
    Shabbir Hassanally
    183 Vaughan Road
    West Harrow, Middlesex HA14EQ
    GB
    Phone: +44 7764 947 816
    Fax..: +44 208 933 0929
    Email: shabbirh@mubahela.net

    Registrar Name....: Register.com
    Registrar Whois...: whois.register.com
    Registrar Homepage: http://www.register.com

    Domain Name: E-JIHAD.COM

    Created on..............: Wed, Apr 17, 2002
    Expires on..............: Sun, Apr 17, 2005
    Record last updated on..: Tue, Jun 17, 2003

    Administrative Contact:
    mubahela.net
    Shabbir Hassanally
    183 Vaughan Road
    West Harrow, Middlesex HA14EQ
    GB
    Phone: +44 7764 947 816
    Fax..: +44 208 933 0929
    Email: shabbirh@mubahela.net

    Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
    Register.Com
    Domain Registrar
    575 8th Avenue - 11th Floor
    New York, NY 10018
    US
    Phone: 902-749-2701
    Fax..: 902-749-5429
    Email: domain-registrar@register.com

    Domain servers in listed order:

    NS.MUBAHELA.NET 209.51.129.80
    NS2.MUBAHELA.NET 209.51.129.81

    --

    CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  18. Well, doh. by argent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We knew it was a hoax yesterday.

    Hot news! Obvious hoax TURNS OUT TO BE HOAX!

    *sigh*

  19. Re:US media vs other countries by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Independent of government interests, but not independent of corporate interests.

    The U.S. public broadcasters seem to have a similar flavour and freedom as the BBC.

    While Fox, CNN MSNBC et. al. exist entirely for profit and they're not judged on the quality of their news, but the palatability of thier content to their advertisers. The correlation between news and the public is a secondary effect of what the networks feel the advertisers feel the public wants to see... curbed by the advertisers' tendency to not want the public to see things which make the public adverse to particular forms of spending.

    There are notable exceptions to the rule, but there are a lot of big stories which go ignored on "slow news days"

  20. Re:try 99% of every country. by gantzm · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...and Cargo Cult islanders.

    Oh, that's just great. Now I've got this image of isolated islanders wearing grass lab coats building a nuke out of bamboo and coconut milk.

    Meanwhile an islander in a grass business suit is running about complaining infiltration from the "acka-ack-nunucket" island.

    Thankfully I think I see Feynman swimming to shore, maybe he can save me!

    --


    Excessive forking causes un-wanted children.
  21. The correct spelling is "Faux". by Lethyos · · Score: 3, Funny

    Get it right, will ya!

    --
    Why bother.