Slashdot Mirror


HP Linux Laptop Is A Winner

minus_273 writes "MSNBC is currently running a story on the front page reviewing the new HP Linux laptops. In a story titled 'H-P's first Linux laptop a winner', the article provides a brief look at the accomplishments and some of the shortcomings of the nx5000; a new inexpensive HP business laptop that comes with SUSE installed. The author seems extremely happy about how everything just works out of the box and mentions the significance of the product. Could HP+SUSE go the way of Apple+BSD and become an option for those that want friendly non-windows laptop? Releasing an easy to use Linux system is a good first step." We mentioned this laptop a few weeks ago.

97 of 412 comments (clear)

  1. First Post by Trigun · · Score: 4, Funny

    From my Suse/HP Laptop!

    YESS! Now to hibernate!

    1. Re:First Post by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Funny

      "YESS! Now to hibernate!"

      * Trigun closes laptop lid and waits for hibernation

      * Trigun keeps waiting

      * Trigun is still waiting

      * Trigun reopens lid and looks at the configuration

      * Trigun screams in frustration as he searches for the auto-hibernate settings

      * Trigun throws the laptop out the window and gets a Mac

      ;-)

    2. Re:First Post by advocate_one · · Score: 3, Interesting
      not as much fun as I had the other day with XP on my laptop... I closed the lid while the machine was booting up in XP... I then re-opened the lid some twenty minutes later and the damned thing crashed with "Windows has encounter an unexpected error" message... it couldn't survive having the lid closed during the boot sequence...

      Mind you, I have never yet managed to get acpi working for Linux on that laptop (Packard bell iGo 4450, really a rebadged NEC Versa E400), but maybe that's because I'm scared of having to recompile my kernel... when the heck will the major distro vendors supply their distros with a precompiled laptop kernel??? or is this just too difficult an option

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    3. Re:First Post by Trelane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Software Suspend 2 should work, since it doesn't involve the brain-damaged Windows-Only hardware. For instance, I've been using kernel 2.6.7 + software-suspend2 2.0.100 on my Dell Inspiron 8600 to suspend-to-disk for a while now. While it's not 100% yet, it's mostly there (I can generally get a good number of suspend-resume cycles before it stops).

      Look for it soon in a kernel near you. :)

      FWIW, if you really want Linux to work on your hardware, you need to be pestering your hardware vendors. "Gee, I'd love to upgrade, but, you see, you don't support Linux...." Bring up the specific issues if you're familiar with them. Sure, your one voice may not change much in a large company, but if many voices speak up, they will be heard. Same reason I vote in an election.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    4. Re:First Post by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've got a PB iGO4450 too!! :-D

      I have SuSE 8.2 Pro installed on it, and I thought the same thing about have to recompile (I think one of the messages implies this). You don't have to. My notes (for SuSE linux btw) are:

      "After installing SuSE 8.2 on the PB iGo 4450, ACPI is not enabled. To enable it, simply to into YaST2-->System-->Runlevel Editor-->Runlevel Properties and enable ACPI and check the runlevel 5 box. AFAIK the battery monitor is the only service currently working-- the suspend functions have not been implemented yet."

      HTH!

      ps. I've also got the modem working... say if you want the notes on how to do this.

    5. Re:First Post by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Touchy, aren't we? FYI, Mac laptops hibernate better than ANY other model of laptop in existence. Close the lid, and you'll see the pulsing light in ~2.5 seconds. Open the lid and the screen will come on in about 3 seconds. Because of this, most Mac users don't even know that there's a "shutdown" option in the menu.

    6. Re:First Post by name773 · · Score: 2, Informative

      maybe that's because I'm scared of having to recompile my kernel...
      don't be. just put both kernels (your old one and the new one) into your bootloader. if the new one fails, just use the old one and retry :)

    7. Re:First Post by Trelane · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I'd pay $10-$30 or so for a special add-on CD for SuSE or Red Hat or Gentoo or whatever that had licensed codec add-on software (e.g. Microsoft, Apple, Frauenhofer codec plugins to mplayer or xine).

      There may be a market for this....

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    8. Re:First Post by timmi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course I never understood why using "Start -- Suut down -- turn off the computer" and then closing the lid would cause windows XP to hibernate, and when I powered up again later, it booted, finished shutting down and turned off.

    9. Re:First Post by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Er; that's sleep mode, not hibernate. Unless there's some option I'm missing on my iBook, I don't think OS X has a way to hibernate completely like Windows laptops/desktops do. That said, the battery on my iBook, in sleep mode, lasts almost a full *week* of non-use, so it's not a big deal.

    10. Re:First Post by AstroDrabb · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why? On the Mplayer Download Page, they have all the codecs you will ever need. I have yet to run into an audio/video file I was not able to play in Linux with Mplayer. Just download the Mplayer coded DLL files and put them all in /usr/lib/win32, and now Xine, Totem and Mplayer will play _everything_ you throw at them.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    11. Re:First Post by AstroDrabb · · Score: 3, Insightful
      ps. I've also got the modem working... say if you want the notes on how to do this.
      Why don't you post how you got the modem working on LinModems.org so that other users can get the same modem working? This is how the Linux community works : )
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  2. What is more amazing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    MSNBC is currently running a story on the front page reviewing the new HP Linux laptops. In a story titled 'H-P's first Linux laptop a winner',

    or

    LinuxJournal is currently running a story on the front page reviewing the new HP Windows laptops. In a story titled "HP Windows laptops kick ass"...

    1. Re:What is more amazing? by ForemastJack · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, no. You picked the wrong statement out of the writeup. The truely amazing line is:

      "We mentioned this laptop a few weeks ago."

      Why? Because it implies that /. editors have some knowledge of what stories they've run in the recent past.

      I know that was quite a shock to me.

    2. Re:What is more amazing? by kunudo · · Score: 2, Funny

      How this isn't +5 funny, or perhaps +5 sad, is beyond me...

  3. I am surprised.... by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am amazingly surprised that an HP Linux laptop would become a sleeper hit like this. I mean, I thought it wasn't going to get much press and that it would only be purchased by people who really want pre-installed Linux.

    1. Re:I am surprised.... by Trigun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not really. Getting hibernate to work on a laptop, as well as any exotic functions requires quite a bit of work/digging. The vendors have the resources and knowhow to create the software for it, since they built the hardware.

      Servers I'll install myself, Desktops I'll install myself. I control the hardware that goes into them. Laptops however, I don't have so much control.

    2. Re:I am surprised.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Walmart notebook Mobile Athlon 1600+... $600 flat!!! Rip away Win XP home edition and you got one nice but cheap litle screamer. I hope they come up with a Linux edition though, for a few bucks less.

    3. Re:I am surprised.... by Bastian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would buy one, and I might even keep the pre-installed Linux if it were a distribution that I use, but even if I wanted to put something else on my machine, I would still be happy just to have a laptop where I have an assurance that all of the hardware in the machine is going to work reasonably well with Linux.

    4. Re:I am surprised.... by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I am amazingly surprised that an HP Linux laptop would become a sleeper hit like this. I mean, I thought it wasn't going to get much press and that it would only be purchased by people who really want pre-installed Linux.

      Ummm, maybe I'm missing something but where did the article say anything about sales numbers?

      Anyhoo, as long as I'm posting, I was puzzling over:

      For instance, software installs aren't as easy to figure out as on a Windows or Mac computer. You must figure out on your own things like where to store the software and associated programs and how to handle permissions. These are not things most consumers want to do. Installs should be easy to find when completed. That's not always the case for new Linux users.

      I'll take him at his word that something about software installation was difficult to figure out, but I'm not sure what he means. The last part probably refers to menu entries being added seemingly at random to a crazily crowded KDE menu, probably. (That certainly sounds like Mandrake.) But deciding where to store software, and handle permissions? Was he installing things from source tarballs?

    5. Re:I am surprised.... by Excelsior · · Score: 3, Funny

      It works similar to a mail-in rebate. You take the XP install CD, make several copies and sell them on a street corner in Beijing. Then you download Suse and voila, a Linux laptop minus the Microsoft tax.

    6. Re:I am surprised.... by tirnacopu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Think J2SDK (god forbid you would want two versions of this beast simultaneously), think Netscape vs. Firefox and try to install some darned plugin/extension so that it'll work in both and for all users, and also remember that if an extension refuses to install with a cryptic error maybe you didn't hit the exact 0.x.y version or maybe you were supposed to do it as root, restart browser two times and only after that it might work (Enigmail), think about some poor shmuck that goes to yahoo.com wanting to install the messenger thingie and after clicking on the download link expecting some installer to ask for permission is greeted with a message that states "What do you want to do with this x-audio-realplayer file?"...

  4. Not a negative choice by sita · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Could HP+SUSE go the way of Apple+BSD and become an option for those that want friendly non-windows laptop?

    People don't buy Macs because they don't want a Windows machine, they buy Macs because they like Macs!

    1. Re:Not a negative choice by Itsik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      However, on the Macs the OS is made to work with the hardware and vice versa. Does it mean that if this picks up. Manufacturers will realize the potential and make sure that their laptop's hardware is Linux friendly as well?

    2. Re:Not a negative choice by GreatDrok · · Score: 4, Informative

      I bought a Mac (iBook G4 14") because I was sick of the increasingly poor quality of Intel based laptops. My last Toshiba cost me £1500 and it didn't even last 18 month before it was dead. My iBook cost me £1000 and it is already 10 months old and still in great shape having been used just as much as the Toshiba was. By this point the Toshiba case was cracked and chipped, the paint had rubbed off where my palms rest and the screen was starting to flicker. Eventually the battery died and then the screen failed.

      I never used Windows on my laptops, I always made sure they could run decently with Linux. The best bit with the Mac is it is Unix and everything works right out of the box.

      I think it is good that Intel based laptops are appearing with Linux preinstalled but I still think a Mac is better value. This is my first Mac and it definitely won't be my last.

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    3. Re:Not a negative choice by nine-times · · Score: 3, Insightful
      People don't buy Macs because they don't want a Windows machine, they buy Macs because they like Macs!

      Not necessarily. For me, being a Mac user is a somewhat negative choice. I vote with my wallet, and therefore don't want to buy another copy of Windows. The other obvious option is a Linux or BSD type Unix-alike, but they aren't quite as effortless as I'd like, and they don't come with apps (that I've found) that quite measure up to Dreamweaver and Photoshop. A Machintosh, while not really perfect either, satisfies my needs.

      My point is, though there are people who are very devoted to Apple, many Mac users are people who understand none of these OS's or architectures are perfect, but Apple just represents the best choice we can find.

    4. Re:Not a negative choice by GreatDrok · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nice FUD! What about all the press lately about defective powerbooks that apple refuses to fix? problems with ipods that apple refuses to acknowledge? Apple has just as many problems as Intel-based computers does.

      For the record, I've got an IBM Thinkpad 350C that's over 10 years old that *just* stopped working, and I think it's the power cord. I'll take Big Blue and 10 years of productivity over *anything* else, regardless of os or manufacturer, anyday.

      I don't see why it is FUD. I stated clearly that it was recent Intel based laptops that were a problem. I recently retired a 10 year old Toshiba that had finally reached the end of its possible uses but it still worked. But if you want something more modern than a P75 you need to look at the current state of play. Granted a laptop from IBM today is going to be better than the Toshiba Satellite Pro 3000 I bought but it is also more expensive and that was more expensive that my iBook. Also, granted there have been some problems with Apple Powerbooks and iBooks but at the end of the day all manufacturers have problems. Also, Apple has fixed the issues although I do agree they have been slow to respond.

      It is a fact that my iBook is better made than the Toshiba I had before and it is clearly holding up to daily use better than the Toshiba. It is also a lot cheaper than an IBM. Oh, and OS X is much nicer than Linux on a laptop. That is a fact and I have been a Linux user since 1994 (before that I used SunOS).

      So, where's the FUD?

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    5. Re:Not a negative choice by nine-times · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Well, Photoshop will work under WINE. Haven't tested Dreamweaver myself, yet, though.

      Yeah, I understand that. But I still end up asking myself, why bother with all that when there's MacOS, which does everything I need, natively.

      I'm not saying much here, remember. All I was saying is, none of these systems are perfect, and some of us find MacOS the best choice. Just the best choice for us, the ones who are choosing it. I use Linux in other places. I have my desktop at work and my FTP server running Gentoo. But for my personal computer, my laptop, I'm just looking for certain functionality with the fewest headaches, and for what I want, I chose a Powerbook, in what the OP called a "negative choice". Windows isn't what I'm looking for. Linux doesn't fit the bill. MacOS comes closest, I'll go with it for now.

    6. Re:Not a negative choice by boredMDer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know there have been problems with the hardware.

      My iBook has had the logic board replaced three times, and four days ago Apple replaced it because the board died again.

      The boards that would 'sizzle and die'? Those were in G3 iBooks, not in PowerBooks.

      Don't even start with the PowerBook 5300. That happened ONCE, in a TEST LAB, a PREPDOCUTION MODEL, with a DEFECTIVE BATTERY. No 'flaming powerbooks' were ever released to the public.

  5. MSNBC? Said good things about Linux and HP? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    Bill: I want his head on a stick.
    Steve: We can't do that, it'd be murder.
    Bill: Ruin his career then, have him sent to North Korea as a technology correspondent.
    Steve: Yes, Master.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:MSNBC? Said good things about Linux and HP? by winse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      whatever....if you read the whole article it comes of as more of a troll.

      Tell that to Windows and Mac users and they'll laugh.

      etc. etc. I felt betrayed by the linux friendly title. also
      " When I install Linux on my personal laptops I usually have to buy software to watch a movie."

      does anyone know where i can BUY linux dvd viewing software? I have only used MPlayer in the past.

      --
      this sig is deprecated
  6. Wow, suprised MSNBC would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, suprised MSNBC would put a pro-linux title and article on the front page

  7. Not the same by dfj225 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't get me wrong, I like Linux and I think it is great that you can finally buy a Linux laptop where everything just works, but I still think it trails behind Apple. I can run Photoshop and MS Office on my iBook without any gimmicks or compromises like I would need to run them on a Linux laptop. Also, when I buy new hardware or look for a new program, there is a pretty good chance that there is support of OS X. The chance of finding mainstream items that support Linux is still very slim.

    --
    SIGFAULT
    1. Re:Not the same by agent2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to start an argument, but most mainstream hardware devices are actually the ones that do work. It's the less-mainstream hardware that uses a not so popular chipset that you may have trouble with. For example, the Realtek chipset is a very common audio and networking chipset used by many manufacturers. nVidia I know for a fact and ATI, I believe, have created their own actual linux video drivers. So, just about any piece of hardware you get will most likely work when you plug it in. About 80% of hardware I'm guessing.

    2. Re:Not the same by LS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is this insightful? Why is this a comparison with OS X??? I think the big deal here is that this is a FREE OS. You are thinking "non-windows". I'm thinking "non-commercial", "non-proprietary". In that case, OS X and Windows are in the same boat. Go use Windows instead of OS X if you want the best hardware support.

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    3. Re:Not the same by dfj225 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know this is supposed to be funny, but I think I should comment anyway. I don't think Linux sucks, it really is a viable alternative to Windows, it is just that I was pointing out that Linux still needs a lot of work to be done. Think about it, if people on /. and other geeks are surprised that this laptop works without any problems then imagine what the normal user's ideas about linux must be? they probably think it is a piece of garbage or that it is only something for servers. In many ways, the average user is not ready for linux (or to put it more accurately linux is not ready for them) a lot of work needs to be done if not only to the code but to the image of linux on the desktop.

      --
      SIGFAULT
  8. Reviewer seems VERY easy to impress by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The author seems extremely happy about how everything just works out of the box

    Just how low is the fsking bar when a reviewer has to note that nothing was broken when he first powered on the system?
    C'mon people, raise your standards for a "good" system!
    --
    I always wanted an iPod how about you?

    1. Re:Reviewer seems VERY easy to impress by Querty · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really, I have yet to see more than 50% of windows machines (desktop/laptop) work 100% out of the box. You must be one lucky guy...

  9. In a related story . . . by kelzer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft has announced it's putting its share of MSNBC up for sale.

    --

    ---------------------------------------------
    SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  10. Here by dandydd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work at a major university. I have been trying forever to get my boss to purchase all our machines with linux on them (he kept claiming that HP required us to buy them with windowsm which was true a while back). We went to Novell brainshare and saw SUSe 9.0 in action and linux has come a long way. SUSE 9.1 "looks even better (more eye candy at least)
    It wasn't ready for my laptop about a year and a half ago but maybe now it is.

    It's for real. I normally don't go for these things but...Free ipods (click here to get yours) .

  11. HP and Linux by brilinux · · Score: 5, Informative

    I put Gentoo on my HP ze5600, and I have been quite impressed. The winmodem works, the ATI Radeon works, the WiFi works with NDIS Wrapper, and even ACPI hibernate mode seems to work fine. I hope that companies like HP continue to support more variety in their OS options.

  12. Huh? by idiot900 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    First, props to MSNBC for continuing to dispel the idea that they are an MS shill.

    Second, here's a quote from the article:
    For instance, software installs aren't as easy to figure out as on a Windows or Mac computer. You must figure out on your own things like where to store the software and associated programs and how to handle permissions. These are not things most consumers want to do. Installs should be easy to find when completed. That's not always the case for new Linux users.

    What is the writer referring to? RPMs know where to install themselves, and what permissions to set. And does SuSE not have a menu system a la the Debian menu, which inserts itself in the various desktop environments?
  13. Ok... by Cyno01 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So apparantly linux is ready for the laptop, but when will it be ready for the desktop?

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  14. The Sleeper Must Awaken! by MerryGoByeBye · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Actually, this could be the biggest sea-change in years. Major change comes slowly but surely (see: Google) and the significance of a functioning-out-of-the-box Linux laptop install (where problematic wireless issues most often arise) cannot be overstated.

    Much can be said for how far Linux has come, but there's a long way to go, especially where finding and configuring hardware is concerned. (Don't reply with the sycophantic "Have you seen how good kxxxawsum is?"; yes, I have.) This looks like a major step.

  15. Re:Not looking good. by value_added · · Score: 2, Interesting

    " I didn't see any price quote from the article"

    Like this one?

    "Street prices for the nx5000 will begin at $1,140.Add extra memory, a larger hard drive, a DVD writer, a better screen plus 802.11g and the total should be a lot more."

  16. Somebody at MSNBC is gonna get soooo fired... by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...once word filters up to Mr. Gates about this little article...

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Somebody at MSNBC is gonna get soooo fired... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you kidding me? Bill probably commissioned the story in the first place!
      Now he can tell the European Commission's antitrust unit how he's pro-competition!

      /me adjusting tinfoil hat


      --
      I always wanted an iPod how about you?

  17. Re:Out of a job? by idsofmarch · · Score: 3, Informative

    Slate.com recommended dumping IE for Firefox: http://www.slate.com/id/2103152/ Salon also had a similar reaction, but isn't owned by Microsoft. Slate, however, may be on the block.

    --
    Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
  18. Re:Not looking good. by valkraider · · Score: 2, Informative

    I didn't see any price quote from the article

    hard to see a quote from the article if you didn't even read the article...

    "Street prices for the nx5000 will begin at $1,140.Add extra memory, a larger hard drive, a DVD writer, a better screen plus 802.11g and the total should be a lot more."

    Also worth noting, is that is right in the same ballpark as the Apple iBooks in performance and features and cost...

  19. Interesting Pricing by sublimusasterisk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I headed over to HP to price this thing how I'd like it. The select box for the OS allows me to pick the Suse option, but only subtracts $50 USD. After some research, that's actually about right. So, where's the big money savings by going to linux?

    --
    True believers seek redemption from the sin of death.
    1. Re:Interesting Pricing by leadsling · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Don't forget that is just the OS. There's hundreds of $$$ worth of software included with Suse that you would have to go out and buy to be productive with a new win computer.

  20. MOD PARENT UP! by still_sick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, it's Linux so in Slashdot's eyes they instantly get 10 cool points, but come on.

    Stuff not working out of the box is noteworthy in a bad way. Everything working the way that it's supposed to is just what's supposed to happen.

    Yeah, I know for a long time it was a criticism of Linux that driver support sucked - so in a way I can understand why he'd mention it. But the fact that everything is supported on the laptop is not a good (TM) thing. It's merely the absence of a bad thing.

    It's like saying that a new Windows Laptop was the best ever because it didn't explode when powered up, and didn't cause severe burns to the user's lap. Yeah, great that that's true, but it's not something to go around advertising - that would just show that you expected otherwise.

    --
    ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Stuff not working out of the box is noteworthy in a bad way. Everything working the way that it's supposed to is just what's supposed to happen.


      I agree to a point. When FooCorp sells a laptop running Linux, one should expect it all to work. And there are smaller outfits that do just that - Linux laptops, fully functional (the author notes this but fails to stress the "everything works" angle at that point).

      But the reality of laptop hardware is that it is often a very hostile environment to the end user wishing to install their own OS. And since Linux is not commonly offered, most user experiences with Linux and laptops is a trial of compromises, hacks, and quasi-functionality. Linux users have become used to asking about compatibility when looking at laptop purchases.

      Incidently, Windows faces the same problems. My last discount laptop came with WinME and an option to upgrade to WinXP. I wasn't interested in either option but I had a spare copy of Win2K. Installing this on my laptop was as much a trial as installing Mandrake (both generally worked - but it required considerable effort to get both supporting all my laptop features).

      Now, I would have had an easier time installing WinXP. After all, the manufactorer offered it as an option and offers all the appropriate drivers, etc. And that's the real point of this article.

      Want Linux running well on a laptop? But one that's compatible. HP has provided one. Out of the box.
  21. Pay for DVD software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd like to especially commend Hewlett-Packard for including LinDVD playback software with this machine. It, too, works right out of the box. When I install Linux on my personal laptops I usually have to buy software to watch a movie.

    Is it just me or did this guy's credibility just take a hit? There hasn't been commercial DVD software for Linux for that long and I've certainly never heard of anybody using it over mplayer or xine. I guess he'll be the one linux user (other than all the folks who bought this laptop) who the MPAA won't sue when they get around to stopping us from viewing our own DVDs with our own software.

  22. huhuhu... by Azureflare · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Isn't this the classic chicken before the egg problem?

    Will widespread acceptance of linux occur only when dominant software makers support linux, or will widespread acceptance of linux cause dominant software makers to support linux?

    Which will come first?

    It's my opinion that widespread usage will occur first. Then software giants will realize the demand, and they will start supporting it.

    Linux deserves respect and support from vendors, and I believe it will get it soon.

  23. Bah! by deadlysloth · · Score: 2, Informative

    They [HP] are charging the same price for the laptop loaded with MS XP (not Pro) and Suse 9.1. I was kinda hoping that it'd actually be cheaper.

  24. Is MS even supportive of the article? by quadra23 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find this unbelievable that Microsoft (MS) would even ALLOW mention of a Linux-based laptop let alone allow comments as if it was something 'positive'. Since MSNBC is a joint effort between MS and NBC we can probably conclude that NBC won this one ^_^.

    I don't have much faith in the monopoly that is Microsoft "turning over a new leaf" -- stay tuned some backlash....or a missing article (just like when MS had leaked a method would allow Windows XP Home users to have IIS run on their machines which was soon removed). No, don't worry, if the page returns a 404 File Not Found error we all know it's not cause of massive hits to the page itself... or is it? ^_^

  25. Re:Why not just buy a mac ? :) by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Informative

    Msword is a security liability.

    So is explorer.

    I can play files targeted for WMP just fine under Linux. A number of the newer Linux media players will gladly exploit Win32 codec DLLs.

    Your bulletpoints are not compelling.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  26. MSNBC - Linux? by acherrington · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anyone else see this as extrodinary that MSNBC did not spin a story towards microsoft for the first time. Its a good step for them, perhaps I should start looking at their news coverage again.

    (honestly im not troll hunting here, being serious)

    --


    Victory is gained, not in knowing your opponents next move, but in preempting them.
    1. Re:MSNBC - Linux? by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Informative
      Does anyone else see this as extrodinary that MSNBC did not spin a story towards microsoft for the first time. Its a good step for them, perhaps I should start looking at their news coverage again.

      It's not the first MSNBC story to question the superiority of Microsoft:

      (Posting with IE under Gentoo, and I miss the tabs :)

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  27. I hope families don't buy this stuff by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No offense to the /. crowd and Linux fans, but I really hope families don't get bilked into buying Linux laptops or desktops without knowing what they might be getting into.

    I personally think this ia a great step toward making Linux much more mainstream than it is now, but I fear that unsuspecting and uneducated consumers being led around by unhelpful and undertrained sales staff at Circuit City or on the HP sales line might find themselves with Linux machines they really don't like.

    I could see a family making a computer purchase and visiting some retailers that, perhaps, start selling things like Linux laptops and Linux desktops as a novelty item. They get in the store and are like, "WOW! This PC is so much cheaper than that PC over there." They might even think, in their minds, that bad viruses and things come from Windows, so they're even more enthused about the Linux machine.

    They get it home, and then they realize that they have to jump through hoops to play this game or open this document from work.

    Granted, the process I outlined above has to occur to some degree in order to facilitate adoption of Linux as a mainstream PC operating system (or whatever you might call it). I just hope and pray that vendors like HP and major retailers don't jump on the bandwagon a little too eagerly in trying to sell these machines only to find that they've opened a Pandora's box worse than a MyDoom worm on Windows XP... ...instead... ...a really pissed off family that can't run little Sally's Barbie Dream Makeover software.

    A family that ends up returning the Linux machine altogether rather than having the Windows machine with a virus serviced at Best Buy and put back into the wild.

    My 2 cents.

    IronChefMorimoto

    1. Re:I hope families don't buy this stuff by Lisandro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They get it home, and then they realize that they have to jump through hoops to play this game or open this document from work.

      It only takes a bit of education. I mean, i rememeber when i switched my mother's PC to Windows 95 from Windows 3.11, she constantly complained because of the new setup ("Icons are out of place!", "What is this taskbar thing?"). People are lazy, and PC users are the laziest of them all - i don't expect users to become software engenieers, but you can't treat you new laptop like a toaster.

      In any case, a well thought desktop distro like SuSE or Mandrake is as easy to use as Windows, if not easier. As long as people isn't expecting a "cheaper Windows" (and i think HP would be smart enough not to publicite it as such), things will work out with time.

    2. Re:I hope families don't buy this stuff by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, my own hope is that the home market for Linux is recognized as large enough to support game developers writing their games for Linux as a primary distribution route, and advising Windows users to use a bare bones Linux install to run their game under, to provide an online gaming platform that is less likely to be compromised by Windows viruses while playing online.

      Do I see this as being likely to happen? No. But I think it would be a better route.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    3. Re:I hope families don't buy this stuff by natrius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hope families don't buy Macs then. Except for being cheaper than Windows computers, they fit right into your example.

      They get it home, and then they realize that they have to jump through hoops to play this game or open this document from work.

      If anything , they'd be surprised than they can open their work documents without having to install any extra software, as most Linux distros come with an office suite, unlike Windows. I'm sure that most people know that if they bought a Mac some of their old programs might not work. Why wouldn't they consider this with Linux? I never thought I'd ever say this, but I think you underestimate the knowledge of the general population.

  28. I *do* take exception: by H_Fisher · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Talk about damning something with faint praise. From TFA:

    But overall, (and here's where staunch Linux fans will take exception) this machine is not as easy to use for most computer users as the same machine running Windows XP or (if it could) Apple's OS X. You still need to know a lot more about the inner workings of a computer to excel on a Linux machine.

    Maybe I'm missing the boat, but I think this is a given. I've never heard a Linux user claim that someone who's only familiar w/ Mac or Windows is going to fully understand (much less fall in love with) Linux the first time they use it. That kind of negativity - however slight and between-the-lines - is just pushing more people away from Linux by reinforcing the "theirs is harder to use than ours" idea.

    You must figure out on your own things like where to store the software and associated programs and how to handle permissions. These are not things most consumers want to do.

    ...and because of this we have x million Windows machines running with little or no protection, instant worm-fodder.

    Linux to me is professional-grade software - the difference between the Huffy bike you'd get when you're 10 and the 18-speed alloy frame bike you buy when you start racing. It won't always be that way; there are thousands of people out there pushing to make Linux more accessible to Mr. & Ms. Average Joe, but right now it's counterproductive to act like your average AOLer should be able to sit down with KDE and instantly feel at home.

    1. Re:I *do* take exception: by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) Linux *is* hard-to-use. I might be spoiled by owning a Mac, but the poor quality of open-source GUIs consistantly amazes me. Just the other day I tried some MP3 sharing software that blew me away with crappiness.

      2) Windows has already shaken the blue screen of death everywhere except Slashdot. Then again, people on Slashdot frequently complain about Microsoft Bob a product that existed for a few months in 1995 and was soon cancelled.

  29. No they won't by swordboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They have to make it "sound like a winner" in order to get credibility. If you read on, you'll see that they don't recommend the PC for anyone who isn't a Linux expert because You still need to know a lot more about the inner workings of a computer to excel on a Linux machine.

    So, basically, they said that its great but they don't suggest that 99 percent of the Joe Users out there buy the thing. Safe.

    But the article does have points. When the hell are we going to see some standards in Linux to sort this out? Here's my list of needs/wants:

    1) Standard control panel through EVERY distro & desktop environment. Gnome and KDE need to learn how to play nice. Obviously, this will involve some work at lower levels by others. We need everyone to create some STANDARDS here.

    2) An installer. n00b's don't know what the hell a freakin' tar.gz file is and once they do figure it out, they don't know to where they should extract it. If Linux had a standardized software installer (complete with a dedicated file extension that could be "picked up" from a browser click), we'd see a huge Linux section on download.com. Yes - I realize that there are some nice things out there but we need a STANDARD to which every desktop distro can adhere (or else they don't get that fluffy "Desktop Linux Compliant" sticker that the industry also needs to invent).

    3) Rules for software companies. Right now, there's no problems with this as there are with Windows because Linux hasn't become mainstream. What am I talking about? Software installs run amok. I hate to see Windows programs putting shortcuts *everywhere* - quick launch, desktop, taskbar, programs menu (and sometimes right even off of the top of the start menu). Some of them even install their own "tool bars". WTF? If Linux doesn't fix this NOW, before it becomes desktop mainstream, we're gonna have to live with it forever. We don't need uninstall icons right off of the program menu if there's another way to do it in the control panel. FORCE companies to put software installs in ONE LOCATION. Put it off of root? Sure, why not? Nobody's stopping me.

    Forever.

    Hell... its Friday so I'm gonna go now. I really wish there were a place to submit all these suggestions that I've got.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:No they won't by wsapplegate · · Score: 4, Informative

      > 1) Standard control panel through EVERY distro & desktop environment. Gnome and KDE need to learn how to play nice. Obviously, this will involve some work at lower levels by others. We need everyone to create some STANDARDS here.

      You could maybe lend a hand. The source is available, you know. First problem to tackle : write configuration software that will parse *any* configuration file thrown at it. That's not so trivial. Some configuration files have very hairy syntax (*cough* Sendmail *cough*). Next, make sure your software doesn't do a big mess while writing changes, this will irk power users (I did make a clean, commented /etc/fstab, and the stupid Mandrake configuration tool wrote back a mangled thing without comments or indentation. This is not acceptable). I wish you good luck. This ain't a piece of cake, to say the least.

      Still, there are efforts in this area. One example would be the GNOME System Tools. Although I won't settle for something less than stellar, this kind of software could satisfy you. As for your demand that everything should be the same from distro to distro, I just can't understand why that would be. The very point of having more than one distro is, we get to choose which one is best suited to our working methods. And, generally, we end up settling on one preferred distro and we don't move anymore (instead, we go trolling on Web forums saying it is the best distro ;-)) For my part, I chose Debian. But I guess it wouldn't please you. That's why you'll be so happy when you'll be able to get Mandrake or SuSE (or Fedora, or Gentoo, or even Slackware, whatever).

      > 2) An installer. n00b's don't know what the hell a freakin' tar.gz file is and once they do figure it out, they don't know to where they should extract it. If Linux had a standardized software installer (complete with a dedicated file extension that could be "picked up" from a browser click)

      An installer... you mean, like apt-get ? You know, that tool you just tell 'install foobar', and it downloads and installs the program foobar ? Or would you like some graphical thingie like Synaptic, where you just click on the program, then on Install ? Don't tell me you're still building from source without some specific reason on a 2004 distro ? That's SO nineties ;-) Also, I gather you want the files to have specific extensions. I'm not sure why (MIME types are way better metadata to identify files), but be advised the .rpm and .deb extensions are just that. Ain't life cool ?

      > 3) Rules for software companies. Right now, there's no problems with this as there are with Windows because Linux hasn't become mainstream. What am I talking about? Software installs run amok. I hate to see Windows programs putting shortcuts *everywhere*

      Then, you'll just LOVE Linux : you see, the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard specifies very clearly where files go on a Linux distribution : binaries (executables) in /usr/bin, libraries in /usr/lib, data files in /usr/share/{programname}, and so on. The menus also have been unified between KDE and GNOME. Not to mention that package management makes it a lot easier to know what your package has really installed, and you'll be sure to find your configuration and documents in your home directory. No more nightmares finding them in C:\Program Files\Foobar\Obscure\Path\Name\You\Would\Never\Hav e\Thought\Of. Linux makes managing your software a breeze :-)

      That's it. I hope I've been helpful, and I wish you good luck in your quest for a better Linux. But remember : diversity and freedom to experiment with your own solutions is what appeals so much to Linux users. A more rigid f

      --
      Xenu brings order!
    2. Re:No they won't by adrianbaugh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gnome and KDE will always have some different config requirements because, well, they're different systems. There will always be some things they do differently - just like vi and emacs have different configs. However, where I agree with you is that the stuff that is common - dealing with X, with hardware config, font rendering and so on - should be configged in a similar way. Obviously there will have to be different clients (Qt and GTK+), but the backend should be the same (if that is true then the clients will probably evolve similarly anyway).

      Fortunately a lot of the work I see going on on freedesktop.org seems to be heading in this direction. It won't happen immediately, but I think in 3-4 years gnome and KDE (as well as other DEs) will be able to play very nicely together with minimal effort.

      As for the installation / deinstallation stuff you mention, there's already pretty good standards for this (LSB). Most distributions adhere quite well to it, and the installation / deinstallation is managed very well by apt or rpm or various front-ends (take your pick). Generally, people who need to know how to deal with source tgzs are experienced enough to deal with them fine; certainly, for commercial software a company would be insane not to offer it as a deb or rpm - these are the de facto standards now. You're worrying about a problem that has already been solved.

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    3. Re:No they won't by Kenshin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Standards stifling innovation?

      Imagine if other industries simply laughed at the idea of standards...

      "I'm sorry, but this DVD is incompatible with your Sony DVD player."

      Anarchy never got anyone anywhere.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    4. Re:No they won't by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Gentoo is not a distro I'd ever give to my non-technical family. Neither is Debian. The reasons should hopefully be obvious.
      The only obvious reason I can see is that they require technical knowledge to install. That's a non-issue if it's preinstalled at the factory.

      This is a good thing for Linux; hardware vendors should be able to knock off the rough edges (a lot of which are due to incompatible peripherals) - well if they can't, who the heck can?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:No they won't by PastaLover · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sadly, the grandparent is right in this aspect. What you wrote applies to GPL programs shipped with the distro only. Commercial software (Acrobat Reader, Mathematica) installs into /usr/local/$somedir and that's it. The most you can expect is some links created in /usr/local/bin. I'd like to see a Mathematic .rpm package conforming to FHS, but that's just a dream.

      Some people conform to it, others don't. The point being that there is a standard on this stuff. That some people aren't keeping to it is their customers' problem, not those who developed this standard. What's important is that these noncompliant packages at least don't easily break the system like all those windows legacy apps do.

      In any case we're going to see a lot more discussion in the future between the people that say "you should be able to configure everything with graphical apps". And those (and I'm leaning towards it) who say "learn to use a damn text editor (really when you've edited a couple of config files you quickly get the hang of it). In any case, standardizing at such a high level als the end user interface requires throwing out a whole lot of perfectly good alternatives and I don't think people would stand for it.

      In essence what the OP is saying doesn't really apply. I don't think it is exactly important that there is one "configuration panel to end them all" or something like that. That is still thinking coming from a very limited, windows-centric world. What is important is that if you should want to use graphical configuration apps in whatever is your desktop environment, they should work for your particular situation in your particular distro. I don't think the average user will keep switching from gnome to kde or something and actually notice that. Not if we're just talking about system configuration.

  30. Does anyone see the option? by pr0vidence · · Score: 2, Informative

    Perhaps I am a complete and utter idiot. Which is entirely possible. Does anyone see the option on the web site to include Suse in place of WinXP? I can't find it anywhere. I wanted to customize a system to see what it would cost. Possibly even consider buying one 1) because my Compaq 1800t is starting to show it's age, and 2) to help show that there IS a market out there for Linux desktops/laptops.

    When it comes to replacing my laptop, an HP would not have been my first choice, but if I can get it WITHOUT paying the MSFT tax, that's a HUGE plus for them. (for those who may point out HP/Compaq are the same, yes, but I bought my laptop shortly BEFORE the merger was announced).

  31. Tadpole Talin by Jahf · · Score: 3, Informative

    There has been a good SuSE (actually in this case Java Desktop System) Linux business laptop that "just works" out for 9 months now. The Tadpole Talin 15". The also now have the 12 inch screen model available.

    Not as big a brand name as HP ... but then again HP's brandname hasn't been that great for awhile now anyway.

    The Tadpole machines may be more expensive (no way for me to know, I got my Talin 15 as a demo box and their website doesn't say) so I'm not saying you should definitely get this one over the HP box if that is a concern ... just pointing out some other alternatives.

    Things in this respect are definitely improving.

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    1. Re:Tadpole Talin by Junta · · Score: 2, Informative

      Note, Tadpole has been a niche laptop maker for a looong time. I have a Tadpole SPARCbook II lying around (640x480 color screen, slow-ass 32-bit SPARC that was really cool when the laptop was new). They for the early part of their existence made exclusive SPARC architecture laptops running SunOS..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  32. hibernate by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 4, Informative

    hibernation on my toshiba tecra 8100 with kernel 2.6.8.1 works perfectly, with latest kernel patches. I use debian so a line in /etc/apt/sources.list :

    deb http://cp.yi.org/apt/hibernate ./

    makes sure I have latest hibernate scripts.

    I just assigned 'sudo /sbin/hibernate' to "sleep" button in my session manager. I also had set up sleepd to hibernate when battery drops to 5% (which is usually 2 hours).
    And, yes - there is a glitch - if I hibernate with blender or glxgears running, then after restore the 3d acceleration gets screwed up, and sooner or later I want to restart Xserver anyway (graphic card is s3 savage).

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
    1. Re:hibernate by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      God forbid somebody make a post like that without the obligatory "works for me!" reply that utterly misses the point.

      "Hibernate works for me! All I had to do is upgrade the kernel, change a line in my etc/apt/sources.list, assign a 'sudo' command with a session manager, set up 'sleepd' to hibernate when the battery drops and there are a couple glitches that mean I have to restart my window session, but hibernate works great! It was SO EASY!"

      Feh, Linux users.

  33. What's he gonna say? by dameron · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Usually I download DeCSS from one of the available offshore repositories. Yeah, I know it's illegal, but who reads MSNBC anyway?"

    -dameron

  34. I went to the HP site by danieljpost · · Score: 2, Informative

    Same big disappointment I found when I learned Dell was supposed to be working with Linux.

    When I click Customize, the stupid site did NOT give me the option of changing the Operating System. It's hardcoded as Windows XP (here was the first clue: it's an ASP page....

    It's possible that I may have looked in the wrong place.

    http://h71016.www7.hp.com/dstore/ctoBases.asp?Pr od uctLineId=430&FamilyId=1776&jumpid=re_R2515_store/ smProdCat/PSG/notebooks/HP_nx5000_notebook

    Anyone else have any luck actually trying to order this thing?

    --
    We must drive a sword through any hypothesis that is not strictly necessary.
  35. Re:power management and wifi by kunudo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was gonna say rtfa, but I won't... :)
    Wifi: Hp has added another wifi adapter that is supported ny linux. So the intel one just sits there idle.

  36. Re:power management and wifi by Fouquet · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can't comment on the HP machine, but am running Suse 9.1 on my Gateway 200X. The CPU throttling, fan, and disk management worked without any fiddling. I had to turn on the suspend to disk, because Suse defaults this off. This was easy, but couldn't (as far as I know) be done from within YAST. I had to change one switch in '/etc/powersave.conf'. The suspend-to-ram is flakey, and I've heard it is not well developed yet. It will suspend just fine, and the light on the front of the case starts blinking (just like it does under a Windows standby), but nothing short of pulling the plug will allow the machine to turn back on. None of the buttons are responsive (under windows, I just hit the power button).

    As for wifi, the centrino chip now works under SuSE 9.1. You have to install the proper firmware, but this shows up when you run your first software update. Otherwise, it works fine - even WEP.

    I think what this says is not so much that hardware is becoming better, but that SuSE 9.1 is really quite good.

  37. Try reading a few paragraphs of the article first by nacs · · Score: 5, Informative
    It'd probably be too much to ask some people to read the product page for the laptop but the least you can do is read the first sentence of the 2nd paragraph:

    Hewlett-Packard is now taking orders for their nx5000 business notebook computers with Novell's SuSE Linux 9.1 installed.


    HP is intentionally targetting the enterprise market with this laptop and have stated this multiple times in the past.

    Cnet even has a video where an HP representative tells us that HP is targetting enterprises and that they're doing this more as a trial run to work out kinks and see what improvements users request before they put more resources into this segment.
    --
    "I filter at +6, and have yet to miss out on an important comment." (#822545)
  38. how is the keyboard? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It's from the Compaq side of HP. Playing with Compaq laptops at Best Buy and/or Circuit City, I'm NOT impressed with the keyboards. Is this one better?

    I went to HP's website and configured one, and compared to a similarly configured Powerbook at Apple's site, and the HP comes out a lot cheaper, with a similar weight, and a higher resolution display, so it looks like a good choice for a non-Windows laptop, if the keyboard doesn't suck.

    So far, the only good keyboard I've found is on ThinkPads. (No Apple dealer within 30 miles of where I live, so I haven't been able to check out Powerbook keyboards yet).

  39. Re:Downside by TaintedPastry · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The false appeal here is that they would be diving into a Linux laptop without knowledge of linux, bash, using source code etc. While much of that knowledge is not necessary for business applications, I think eery Linux user shoud have some scripting capabilities to make full use of their OS.

    Which, if true, will need to change for Linux to severely cut into the 94% market share that Windows has.

    Besides, few end-users ACTUALLY make full use of their operating system - a point missed by most of the tech community. Because they are our livelyhood, they're also are lives (most of the time.) For everyone else, it's just a computer. Many facets of the Linux/Windows/Whatever battle don't even apply to the people the results will affect: Mom, Dad, Jimmy Five year old, Missy High School Report - none of these people will, or should for the matter, need to know how to use WSH, PERL to use their computer as they want.

    Diversity, OpenSource, and Choice are great...but the tech community is taking itself far too seriously in this matter.

  40. Re:I dunno if Apple is the best comparison by valkraider · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But don't you have to buy all those same things with other companies as well? How is Apple any different? We bought my sister a HP laptop about 3 months ago (her school provides support for their teachers and they won't support anything but Windows). We paid $1400 for the laptop, $200 for the extended warranty (it came with 90 days), it only came with 256 RAM so I upgraded it to 1GB, and we paid $100 for a basic laptop satchel. All in all it was about $1800 total cost.

    Apple actually STARTED with virtually ALL of the PC market share (Apple II years), and has been losing market share every year since then. We don't need to rehash the market share vs. installed base and related arguments. Apple does not cater to yuppie techno elite, however they *are* more popular with artist types. But I am a software developer who switched when Apple OSX hit the market because it is the nicest *nix I have ever used. And I'll tell you what - I have had many many fewer issues with the 5 Macs in my home than with the PCS that I had prior. I was constantly tinkering and fixing with my Windows/Linux PCs. I decided - I do that all day - I want to have computers that are nice to use when I come home. And now I do, thanks to my Macs and OSX.

    But the claim was that Apple only sells > $3000 computers. That is false.

  41. yeah, try and buy it from their web site by yagu · · Score: 2, Informative

    This MAY be great news, but it feels more like a publicity stunt... I'm willing and ready to purchase one and not go through all the hoops of converting a windows box.... Just try and go to the HP site and in a straightforward way navigate to the laptop with linux. What a pain! And, at least in my case, when you finally find the model, and click through to "customize", you'll NOT find linux listed there as an option for OS anymore. Go figure.

    Of course, ymmv.... I'm sure someone will try and find linux and claim it is there and easy to find. But, I navigated, and drilled down about four or five different ways, and never really ended up with an option I was looking for. (This is about two or three times more than I normally afford a web site when looking for something -- before moving on to some easier to use business selling the same item.)

    Additional disclaimer: it may not be only "hiding" linux -- I've shopped the HP web site before and had similar frustrating experience just trying to find a normal laptop or desktop with the configuration I wanted. But, finding the linux configuration was well nigh impossible.

    1. Re:yeah, try and buy it from their web site by enilnomi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agreed; frustrating. Easy enough to the find the base model, just entered "nx5000 linux" in main page search box, and there I was. And there's SUSE, clearly listed as a option. Clicked every "shopping" link offered, but no way to order the linux.

      Worse, I wanted to leave HP a comment about this....but they only accept comments if you enter a name & email addie in the form (don't need anymore sales-mail, thank you very much). Sure, I could fake it, but the whole idea that HP demands that I identify myself just to submit site feedback is nuts, and not worth supporting.

      --
      education is no substitute for intelligence
  42. Interesting by theantix · · Score: 2, Informative

    The main complaint the article highlighted was with changing between network connections, something that both Novell and Red Hat have been working on recently. If you follow Planet Gnome at at, you'd see that both companies have just released glimpses of their upcoming programs which address this very real annoyance with Linux on laptops.

    The other complaint they had was with installing new applications, which shouldn't be a big deal with Red Carpet or Yum (especially if Red Hat/Fedora ever ships with a nice GUI front-end to that). Desktop Linux is rolling along rather nicely, good to see.

    --
    501 Not Implemented
  43. Re:Why not just buy a mac ? :) by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Where did he mention Powerbooks? Either compare it to an iBook (from $1099), or admit to your FUD!

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  44. HP compax NX5000 and wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    For the record, Linux doesn't support Intel's wireless chip. H-P's WiFi modules work just fine.

    Let's just hope nobody tells my wlan nic, otherwise I'll have to resort to fast ethernet.

    I am currently at the kde conference in Ludwigsburg, Germany and working on one of these NX5000 notebooks. Hewlett-Packard was nice enough to sell them for about 580 EUR, which is about 700 USD, to kde developers.
    However, our laptop models included the intel wireless 2200BG card, otherwise known as the dreaded centrino card. But what surprise, the driver from SourceForge works. Sometimes a bit flakey though, but it works...

    Otherwise I am quite happy with the NX5000. The thing looks quite stable, has mostly supported hardware and sports a pair of superb speakers.

    All in all, quite a nifty device for a very reasonable price.

  45. low expectations by kenlars99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps a quote from Chris Rock is in order:

    Niggers always want credit for some shit they're supposed to do. They'll brag about stuff a normal man just does. They'll say something like, "Yeah, well I take care of my kids." You're supposed to, you dumb motherfucker. "I ain't never been to jail." Whaddya want? A cookie? You're not supposed to go to jail, you low-expectation-having motherfucker!

  46. wake me up when... by zapadoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    dell ships their first laptop with FreeBSD and Gnome preinstalled.

  47. HP+SuSE != Apple+BSD by kbahey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The comparison is flawed.

    Apple does not provide "just" BSD. They have heavily customized (in fact forked) BSD and build that wonderful GUI, installation, configuration, ...etc. on top of it. Third party ISVs know that they have to deal with only a finite set of variables on the OS. Mac OS X is not available on any other hardware architecture than what Apple makes. They have a limited set of supported peripherals, ...etc. This gives the users much fewer surprises from incompatibilities and such.

    On the other hand, HP just makes the hardware. There are endless aftermarket peripherals available for it (granted much less than a desktop). They do not have their own fork of SuSE, nor any special GUI on top of it. Hence, one can get SuSE from anywhere, and run it on any hardware, and it would not be much different from HP's offering (apart from being pre-installed, usable by the masses, and perhaps certain features configured specifically for their hardware).

    Apple is playing at a different level than HP.

    Don't get me wrong: I love Linux and has been runnig it myself for years. But this comparison is Apples to HPs.

  48. Sometimes MSNBC impresses me. by stealth.c · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You would think that they would be a Microsoft shill given the fact that it's *MS*NBC, but most of the time I hear the exact opposite kind of talk out of them. They seem to be frank about MS product flaws, and willing to praise praiseworthy competitors.

    Do they just happen to NOT have their heads up their asses, or is there a more cynical explanation?

  49. DVD's on linux-No need for proprietary software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use mplayer or xine+libdecss to play encripted dvds under Suse 9.0/9.1. They are both OK; myself I prefer xine. Kafeine uses libxine,if libdecss is installed, it also plays encripted dvds. A fourth choice is ogle. You DONT NEED proprietary software!

    You can download the source code of libdecss from many places, for example from www.videolan.org. Compile it and you are all set! Under linux you can play any dvds, it does not matter if they are for Region 1, 2, 3,4,5 they just work!

  50. Are the guys at HP schizophrenic? by Shrinky999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am sooooo pissed after reading that HP has such a huge success with it's Linux Laptop.

    That's not because I'm a Windows nut or I don't like HP or stuff, it's because I own a HP Laptop (pavilion ze4360) that is simply not usable under Linux! And I'm not talking about any "nice to have" features like suspend-to-disk or whatever, but about 20min uptime when running on battery.

    They apparently f*cked up the ACPI implementation in the BIOS really bad, so under Linux speedstepping is unsupported. No matter what I did and tried, I had a Laptop that was running at a constant ~1800MHz. Of course I can't expect any help from HP support since the guys answering my inquiries don't quite understand the problem ("But if you use that and that setting in Windows XP your battery _does_ last longer").

    How come HP produces a wonderful Linux Laptop and at the same time makes another one completely unusable for people who want to run Linux?

  51. You utterly missed the point (Feh, Insightful) by mangu · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The point of the whole article was in presenting one laptop where all the tricky configuration details, e.g. making the hibernate function work, have been taken care of by the manufacturer.


    The post you responded to mentioned another laptop where one has to manually configure the hibernate function. The post was informative, because it described in detail how to do it. Now, pay attention, here's the one point which you utterly missed:


    This is what makes Open Source Software so great


    If the hibernate or any other function isn't working correctly in a commercial, closed source, software computer, what do you do? (1) hire a consultant, (2) call 1-800-EAT-SHIT, (3) sit down in a corner and cry? With FOSS, you get other alternatives: (1) Google the error, (2) ask the right on-line forum, (3) read Slashdot. I saved the text of the post you commented to, in my tips.txt file, because even if I don't have a need to configure a hibernate function right now, that's a very informative post. I might need to use exactly those steps or some variation of them in the future.


    However, contrary to what FOSS detractor FUD preaches, normal users do not need to perform all those tricky little steps for every small configuration detail. The article itself had some subtle misinformation, giving the impression that there isn't any good package installation system in Linux.


    The truth is, installing and configuring most software in Linux is simpler and easier than in MS-Windows these days. Using synaptic to install a package or even typing "apt-get install something" in the console is much easier than navigating through a maze of windows, clicking on all those buttons, accepting license agreements, filling in all your life's details in the on-line registration form, etc, etc... Then in the end, where the fsck did the files go? Are they under C:\Program Files, or in C:\My Documents? Or maybe in C:\Windows\System? And, God forbid you having any non-English character in your file names, because then you have to configure the right Code Page! And don't forget to update your anti-virus, because your newly installed software requires the latest anti-virus system to work reliably.


    A positive example of good moderation in Slashdot, I was just browsing the story and found that post, correctly modded to +5, Informative.