Slashdot Mirror


Rio Reveals iPod Mini Slayer

Remik writes "Rio has released a limited edition of its new hard drive based player called Carbon. Coming in lighter and denser (3.2oz with 5 GB of storage) than the Ipod Mini with the same price tag $249, twice the battery life, and nearly the same dimensions. Rio has only made 500 players available in the initial offering, so get one while they last. There's more info at cNet, Pocket Lint and Gizmodo. Highlights: Drag and drop file transfer, charging over USB and Janus compliance."

49 of 527 comments (clear)

  1. The One Missing Feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Indeed, this looks AWESOME, but it's lack of the magical iPod Click Wheel will be the singular feature that kills this product. The click wheel really is the best hardware UI, ever.

    1. Re:The One Missing Feature by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What about the fact that it doesn't work with the iTunes Music Store?

    2. Re:The One Missing Feature by danamania · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed, this looks AWESOME, but it's lack of the magical iPod Click Wheel will be the singular feature that kills this product.

      But it has that other magical iPod mini feature.

      scarcity

      I'm only partly joking. The scarcity helps keep the hype up longer, and I'm sure has helped make the iPod mini -wanted- all the more by many - creating fanatically loyal users, kinda. Works for gmail too.

    3. Re:The One Missing Feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      iTunes makes the deal with the person legally allowed to. That's the RIAA, so that means the RIAA gets to say how much goes to the artists. Artists who have not signed with the RIAA can get all 74 that doesn't go to Apple if they sell directly to Apple.

    4. Re:The One Missing Feature by clifyt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The iTunes Music Store (and Napster, Walmart, etc) are still screwing the artists."

      You know I hear about this all the time, and as an artist that works with a recent grammy winner, as well as my partner having a dozen gold and platinum, I've rarely heard artists complain about getting screwed over by the RIAA or the iTMS. just the opposite -- most of my friends are *TRYING* to get their labels to get them on there, but its taking a little time to do so.

      Note: on occasion, I do hear an artist screaming that they did get screwed over...these are the ones that get an advance check a year before the album comes out, it does poorly, but they've already spent the $$$ and blame the company for their poor performance (it can't be anything associated with their egotistical selves).

      Either way, most of us would rather be paid a little than nothing. You suggest that we should all steal the music simply because we are too fucking dumb to realize that we are just going to get mugged elsewhere -- and you'd rather be the muggers than the music company. Thanks...I know you guys are only looking out for our best interest.

    5. Re:The One Missing Feature by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Like he said, people tend to really overestimate the quality loss when transcoding a single time.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    6. Re:The One Missing Feature by icejai · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "The iTunes Music Store (and Napster, Walmart, etc) are still screwing the artists."

      You know I hear about this all the time, and as an artist that works with a recent grammy winner, as well as my partner having a dozen gold and platinum, I've rarely heard artists complain about getting screwed over by the RIAA or the iTMS


      You haven't said much except the fact that the multi-gold/platinum-grammy-award-winner artists you work with don't feel like they're getting screwed.

      Well duh.

      And who said anything about looking after your best interests? *You* should be looking out for your best interests. *We* should be looking out for our own best interests. Your best interests include getting your music heard, and making $$$. Our best interests include paying only for the music we want. Us looking out for your best interests would be a conflict of interest. The gravy boat of online distribution of music is leaving port, and us telling the music industry "You'd better get onboard if you don't want to get fscked over" is probably the most we'll ever care about your best interests.
  2. Just one thing by Tyrell+Hawthorne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They missed one thing though. The iPod Mini is pretty, this one looks like someone drop a clump of dough, and stuck a display and some buttons in it. But I guess some people like the look of dough!

    1. Re:Just one thing by AuMatar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or some people don't care how it looks. I'll take increased functionality or cheaper price over looks any day of the week.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  3. they forgot the second part of the name... by admactanium · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "copy" looks like a decent piece of machinery. but how lame is it that they've copied so many design characteristics from the ipod? look at the "commemorative" packagaing, which looks almost exactly like the ipod's packaging. and laser engraving on the chromed rear cover of a music player? wow, innovative.

    1. Re:they forgot the second part of the name... by davejenkins · · Score: 1, Insightful

      wow, innovative

      Absolutely innovative. It seems that Rio is offering superior functionality in a package that, if anything, will steal thunder from the hipster factor of an iPod. That is very innovative in my opinion. This same thinking drives most product design, from streamlined cars in the 1930s to PDAs in the late 1990s: steal thunder from the outer packaging while putting your innovations "under the hood".

      If you are buying electronics because the case is "cool" and not the innards, then you are a fool.

    2. Re:they forgot the second part of the name... by peterpi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "If you are buying electronics because the case is "cool" and not the innards, then you are a fool."

      A fool in your eyes perhaps, but what apple realise is that a fool's money is as good as anyone else's.

  4. Cost Prohibitive by MedHead · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I still don't understand why there is such a small price gap between the iPod Mini and the iPod 4th Generation. I can get 4GB for $250, or a 20GB for $300?! The same goes for this player. Why is this system still so expensive? I would have thought the market had advanced enough that the prices would have dropped greater.

    If it's because of the MicroDrive being used in players like the iPod mini, why not start selling iPod full size players in 5GB amounts? It would really be nice to see these "iPod killers" drop below the $200 price tag.

    1. Re:Cost Prohibitive by CountBrass · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because it's aimed at a different market! The mini is aimed at people who are considering a solid-state player: ie size is even more important to them than masses of storage space. It's also aimed at the more style conscious rather than us geeks: hence the multitude of colours for the mini and the choice of any colour as long as it's white for the ipod.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    2. Re:Cost Prohibitive by tfoss · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Why is this system still so expensive?

      Because people are still waiting weeks for the honor of paying $250 for a mini. If the demand is there, why on earth would Apple choose to lower the price?

      -Ted

      --
      -=-=- Quantum physics - the dreams stuff are made of.
    3. Re:Cost Prohibitive by caitsith01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh god... how many times do we have to hear this stupid argument????? The fact is, the price point of these players does not make sense from a logical point of view. I know that people are dumb, so they buy at strange price points, but this does not make the pricing of the mini or this thing a good thing. What it does show is that companies will cynically screw idiot consumers out of every buck they have without thinking twice.

      I mean, just because solid state players are expensive per megabyte doesn't mean Apple or Rio is justified in overcharging people for a comparatively cheaper technology. It reflects an immature market where competitors have not yet moved in with realistic pricing, so at the moment the price point is arbitrary and artificial. It reflects a lack of supply, not the actual value of the goods.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
  5. Hmm. by cascino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, this thing has everything. Except it's really ugly.
    Once again, the competition needs to realize Apple's success is not due to its technical dominance but rather its popular dominance. The iPod (mini) is a part of mainstream pop culture. This new device does not look to replace the mini anytime soon.

    1. Re:Hmm. by halo1982 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Yeah, this thing has everything. Except it's really ugly.

      Once again, the competition needs to realize Apple's success is not due to its technical dominance but rather its popular dominance. The iPod (mini) is a part of mainstream pop culture. This new device does not look to replace the mini anytime soon.

      Exactly what I was going to say. The iPod is now a status symbol. There may be more functional MP3 players (iRiver...debatable) and cheaper MP3 players, but the masses don't want the better player, they want the iPod. Besides, no one has really gotten user friendlyness down except Apple (the click wheel is perfect and the UI is amazing...my dad could figure it out after about 10 seconds and I once got a call from him asking how to open Word..).
      Unf.

    2. Re:Hmm. by gl4ss · · Score: 1, Insightful

      status symbols become irrelevant when everyone has one..

      apple can't just sit on it's ass while others make progress, well, it can but then it'll be fscked again and looking for the next ipod.

      and masses don't know what's better(mac reality distortien field affected don't count as masses either).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Hmm. by Bilestoad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right on - why the hell does it take a Brit (Jonathan Ive) to design an attractive electronic device?

      GUIDELINES for MORON INDUSTRIAL DESIGNERS:

      1. Unneccessary curves are just that - unneccessary. They add manufacturing cost. They make it harder to hold, store or manipulate.

      2. If you're going to copy something, just swalow your pride and copy it. Don't just copy the packaging.

      3. Putting controls where they will be changed by rubbing against the inside of your pocket is stupid. Yes there can be a control lock, no it shouldn't be essential.

      4. Don't mix fonts. If you have to stick a huge name on your device so that people will recognize it then you aren't doing your job right - but if the company insists, coordinate with the software people to use the same font as will be shown on the display.

      Technically wow! Design? Yawn. Looks like a Saturn next to an Audi - trying much harder and achieving much less.

    4. Re:Hmm. by DarkZero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly what I was going to say. The iPod is now a status symbol. There may be more functional MP3 players (iRiver...debatable) and cheaper MP3 players, but the masses don't want the better player, they want the iPod.

      There's also the fact that the iPod's status as a "status symbol" grants it essentially the same feature that Windows has: there's tons of support for it. In much the same way that there are tons of applications and games for Windows and a small percentage of them have a Linux port, there are tons of third party companies that make accessories for the iPod, and a small percentage of them make a matching accessory for another MP3 player. It's gotten to the point where there are entire aisles in some retail stores that are devoted solely to the iPod. Cases, battery packs, car adapters, FM transmitters, portable speakers, headphones... all designed either to interface with the iPod or, in the case where the part fits any MP3 player (headphones), match the iPod's color scheme.

  6. Surely not an iPod Mini slayer by mj_1903 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Once again the competition fails to grasp the fact that you cannot easily scan through over 1000 songs with a nub and your thumb. The iPod will continue to be No. 1 because its interface is that much better than its competitors.

    Anyone else notice the glaring typo's in the system requirements (MAC and spave)? Seems a little rushed to me.

    1. Re:Surely not an iPod Mini slayer by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can scroll through a list of 6000 songs in about eight seconds on the iPod (should I ever want to do something so silly...much easier to blow through the list of artists, which goes by even faster).

      You really underestimate how good that scroll wheel is. Its response is nonlinear so it can be crazy fast and also controllable.

      I've tried the others, and they simply don't compare. If you bought something else, and you're happy with it, that's great. You don't need to bag on the iPod to validate your choice, though.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:Surely not an iPod Mini slayer by caitsith01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Once again the competition fails to grasp the fact that you cannot easily scan through over 1000 songs with a nub and your thumb.

      I don't understand the rationale behind this argument. From a functional point of view I can't see why it's any easier to move a lever up or down to scroll through a list than it is to spin a wheel. In fact, I find with web pages that are particularly long (e.g. ./ discussions) it's a heck of a lot more convenient to click down on my scroll wheel (logitech mouse) and then gently push the mouse up or down to scroll down the page, increasing or decreasing the distance forward that the mouse is moved to speed up or slow down the scrolling. In other words, I use the mouse as a 'lever' not a 'wheel'. With the wheel I have to continually roll it to keep scrolling, meaning that I have to lift my finger again and again.

      Scrolling is an essentially binary operation. You want to go up, or you want to go down. A lever can produce this just as well as a wheel - up and down vs. round and round the other way. It's easy enough to add good analogue control to a lever (see for example the Nintendo 64 and Gamecube controllers for an excellent example). So where's the benefit of a wheel?

      And before you ask, yes, I have used an iPod for considerable lengths of time, including gen. 1, 3, and mini. They are all very nice - but the wheel didn't strike me as inherently superior on any of them.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
  7. gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    moderators, while moderating parent, please keep in mind the definition of the word "gay":
    happy, joyful, lively, festive, bright, colourful.
    thank you.

  8. Not the whole story by Lurkingrue · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I'd agree with you that the thing is damn ugly, I'd take exception about the issue of Apple's dominance.

    The iPod is beautiful and it has a killer interface. Anyone can use it, and it is very intuitive. Each iteration seems to get incrementally more user-friendly and marginally better-looking, too.

    This monstrosity that is a so-called "iPod-slayer" looks hideously cumbersome to use.

  9. No one's commenting about Janus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Janus compliance? Is that supposed to be a good thing(TM)? All the more reason not to buy one.

  10. Janus? by tehanu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A bit off-topic, but wasn't Janus a common symbol fo r duplicity and untrustworthiness in past (and post-Roman) times, as he had a face looking both ways (the saying "two-faced")? So isn't naming a DRM product Janus like naming an airline "Icarius"? Sure he had wings and could fly but...OTOH some would argue that being DRM and MS, Janus is an entirely appropriate name...

  11. I smell a plant. by haunebu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's with the month old news? The linked articles were all published August 2nd through 4th.

    Astroturf?

    --

    Blue skies, Barthy Burgers, girls...

  12. Perfect addition to the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This device doesn't have to kill the iPod mini. In a world where Apple has to license a killer product to HP to solve the under capacity of it's manufacturers, Rio just has to put a comparable device into the market to reap the benefits.

    The fact that Rio made it with better specs than iPod mini will likely help it with consumers who want the most bang for the buck. This is probably a good strategy if you're going after the late comers to the market (after the early adopter's demand has been met). However, Apple's move to leave the iPod mini's specs the same for the HP version seem to indicate they still think it can command premium prices from those looking to be trendy. These people usually are not the late comers. This is an interesting difference of opinion for the execs in each company.

    Only real question is what were the Rio execs thinking when they limit the production run to 500 to artificially constrain demand and feably try to generate excitement. If they think they have an iPod mini killer, they should push like crazy to build awareness. A production run of 500 is just too small.

  13. RE: Rio beating anything by Shutupthenragedlobst · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I registered an account just to post on this topic. For Rio to beat anything at all they'd have to have equal customer service. As it stands they don't. I own a karma. The shitty rio stick broke. I am a real careful guy so I don't know how it happened but the piece of shit broke. Literally broke right off. I don't want to lambaste the mechanical design but the workmanship just seemed shoddy. Then the rio wheel slipped off. All within 2 months of ownning the thing. Fine maybe I got a shitty one whatever I'll RMA it. First thing I noticed customer service is outsourced and is area code 650. Meaning I had to pay to talk to someone who can only handle tier 1 problems. Fine, that's the way it's down now. Sure enough after 3 15 minute phonecalls and two messed up RMA numbers given to me on " accident " I got my RMA number, sent the package in. To an address in Texas. Paid for priorty mail. Fine. Package got lost. Of course. Called Back to 650 customer service. Had it escalated from call center in India to something called legacy support - another third party CS agency. Within the span of one month they had done nothing to return my calls so I began emailing them They intially explained the lack of calls as they had gotten the wrong address and phone number for me; someone in India took my information down incorrectly. They (Rio Customer service) ended up discussing my situation with someone who they thought was my wife. I am not married, and don't even live in the same state as the person they called. They then got the tracking number I e-mailed them wrong 6 times. I wanted to document to them that I emailed it but they got it wrong 6 fucking times. I put in the number in the title the signature, everywhere. They still got it wrong. Mind you they never once called me back. Eventually I cut and pasted it from the USPS website. Magically they then learned that I was in fact telling the truth, but that no one at their texas RMA office could be found to sign for the package so it was never documented as being recieved. Finally I got the matter escalated to a supervisor. At this point it had been one and half months. They not only refused to give me the supervisor's e-mail. They refused to return my phone calls. This lasted two weeks. I finally faxed a copy of every e-mail to their coroporate office, two days later I got a response via e-mail my karma would arrive today. It did. So after nearly two months and 30$ I got it back. Yay. Sorry I just had to rant and wanted to warn peopel about RIO. I'll be making a webpage filled with e-mails and dates and times documenting the veracity of my claim. So it's not that I wish to drum up support here. Please note though that when you buy from a company you buy into their customer service. I own a ibook. I've had amazing customer service from apple. I have had the worst customer service expierence of my life with RIO. That in my opinion is why Rio can't be an Ipod Killer. They don't have the customer service for it.

  14. Are you retarded? by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do you really think anyone beyond apple fan-boys will actualy base their choice of player on the interface? If it it plays music and is easy to use (and yes, it can be easy to use without using a clickwheel) it will sell.

    It might be annoying for ipod users who are used to their interface, but they already have MP3 players...

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Are you retarded? by sessamoid · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Do you really think anyone beyond apple fan-boys will actualy base their choice of player on the interface?

      It seems to be that millions of people "beyond apple fan-boys" already have, considering the ipod is by far the most popular portable mp3 player in the world. This is despite the fact that there are alternatives with more capacity and battery life than ipods. The interface is the distinguishing feature.

      Would you buy a car that you had to steer with two buttons rather than a wheel? If not, why not?

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    2. Re:Are you retarded? by Babbster · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'd argue that the MARKETING is the distinguishing feature. People who had never even CONSIDERED buying an MP3 player suddenly starting seeing commercials about the magical iPod, it looked cool, people started talking about it, and voila - it becomes huge.

      The UI is fine, but the learning curve on my Nomad is only marginally longer than that of the iPod and I personally prefer the placement of the controls on the sides.

      If ANY of the other already existing MP3 players had received the kind of marketing push the iPod got, they could have easily become the "gold standard." Instead, the other companies, either because of a lack of funding or an in-house decision to marginalize their own products as being niche, didn't take the risk.

    3. Re:Are you retarded? by catwh0re · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The interface is the sole reason why "just an mp3 player" such as the iPod has sold so well, they cost more than their competitors, despite doing basically they same thing, and they come from a company whos computer offerings were once looked down apon by the wider community.

      If it's not the interface that has served the iPod so well (over 3Million sales so far) then what do you suppose it is?

      To generalise, it must also be "apple fan boys" (some 10Million at that) that use Mac OS X, and not people who have made a choice away from Windows. (check out www.apple.com/switch some day)

    4. Re:Are you retarded? by caitsith01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Would you buy a car that you had to steer with two buttons rather than a wheel? If not, why not?"

      This is fallacious reasoning. Would you buy a keyboard that had a wheel instead of buttons? You are drawing an analogy to a completely unrelated situation.

      I agree with the other respondent - the differentiating factor is above all else marketing, something that Apple is very good at. It does have a cool design, but so do Rio products and a number of others that are around the place.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    5. Re:Are you retarded? by jest3r · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If it it plays music and is easy to use (and yes, it can be easy to use without using a clickwheel) it will sell.

      The Rio Carbon "iPod Mini Slayer" has been available in black for over a year now; it was actually released months before the iPod mini albiet at 1.5GB.

      It was one of the first "mini" players to offer everything the iPod offered and more ... in a small thin case to boot. With no iPod Mini in sight the player actually had no competition. So why didn't it sell?

      Marketing. The early adopters had already bought their players so the only market left was the masses. The masses are easily influenced by style. Stylish ads, stylish interface, stylish software, stylish player.

      Reviews of the black Rio Nitrus were luke-warm at best. Most people agreed that the player itself was stylish, but the interface was clunky, the software was garbage, and there were no stylish ads to say otherwise.

      Lets face it, every player plays MP3 ... The masses don't really care whether or not the player has OGG support or lossless audio support. So when all things are equal the style factor kicks in.

      This new Rio Carbon is a true testament to the success of Apples approach to marketing style. They have duplicated it right down to the box.

      Unfortunately by doing so there is really no good reason for the masses to jump onboard. When mom or dad is buying an MP3 player for Christmas and they have to choose between the $249 5GB Rio Carbon or the $249 4GB iPod Mini which box do you think they will reach for?

  15. _another_ 'ipod slayer' by mcbevin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    *sigh* ..... seems like every month Slashdot posts the new 'ipod slayer' or 'ipod killer'.

    What the slashdot crowd seems to fail to realise is that releasing a device with a bigger hard drive or longer battery life or some other fancy technical specification doesn't make it an 'ipod killer'. The ipod excels in many other areas - design, ease-of-use, reputation etc.

    Making it worse, these 'ipod killers' are often a joke. They'll have say one technical aspect thats better than the ipod, but on pretty much everything else will fail (i.e. a bigger hard drive but crappy user interface and too big and ugly design etc). Sony's 'ipod killer' is the worst example - release a device crippled with DRM and requiring transcoding to Sony's dead ATRAC format with the resulting awful sound quality and post on slashdot about it killing the ipod. Which is of course a pity because Sony's engineers - if they weren't handcuffed by their music division - could very likely produce a superior product.

    The ipod will of course not remain dominant forever, but it'll take more than a device with just a big hard drive or battery - and with only 500 available - to remove it from the throne.

  16. To be taken with a healthy pinch of salt. by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Rio has a habit of producing mp3 devices that are dependent on propriatary windows software.

    I was considering the rio-nitrus for a while untill I found out that it used an encrypted hard drive, and was in NO WAY compatible with Linux.

    And it also remains to be seen how much it will cost to replace this battery in 1yrs time when they start wearing out.

    Seriously, can anyone give me a GOOD reason why a company, like Rio, would not want other people to write extensions to thier devices?

  17. You're kidding, right? by rtilghman · · Score: 4, Insightful


    First off the user interface on Rios products, when combined with the software they employ, is easily as solid as Apple's line-up (more so IMHO in regards to the Karma, but that's just MHO). Regardless, your statement has ZERO merit since you provide no evidence WHY the Apple interface is superior.

    That aside, the Carbon blows the iPod mini out of the water. First off the drive it uses is from Seagate and is 1gb larger. If I had to pick two companies I trust in HD tech it would be Seagate and WD, and while Toshiba is also pretty solid HDs aren't their main business.

    Next we'll move onto another huge aspect of these players, battery life. The Carbon is cited, and this is a CONSERVATIVE estimate by Rio, at 20 hours. 20 hours! I mean that's TWO days of full use assuming you aren't using it constantly. The iPod mini TOPS OUT (and this is Apple's website here) at 8 hours. I mean is there even a comparison?

    In terms of physical appearance I would vote without blinking for the Carbon. Maybe other people like their technology devices to be Muave or Coral Pink or something and look like a lighter, but I generally like sleek looking futuristic products with a bit of an edge. I think the Carbon looks pretty sharp in all ways, though I'd rather have blue in place of red for the keypad coloring. However, cosmetics are entirely personal, so this is kind of off topic.

    What else is worth mentioning... WMA support which is, regardless of what Apple maniacs might say, much more useful than proprietary AAC support (face it, the world will use WMA DRM whether you like it or not). I don't purchase music online (so I have no use for WMA support), but its good for some folks.

    Voice recorder... mini doesn't have it, Carbon does. Again I don't use it, but its a feature.

    Basically the feature set of Rio's products is already LIGHT YEARS ahead of Apple, and it only seems to be growing. To bash the Carbon because it doesn't use a click wheel you like (and I hate) seems ridiculous to me. And the funny thing is that while I have a Karma I would NEVER buy a Carbon OR an iPod mini... I think a 4-5gb player at the price of a 20gb player is for morons.

    In short, judge the devices on their merits and try to be at least moderately open-minded here.

    -rt

    1. Re:You're kidding, right? by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In short, judge the devices on their merits and try to be at least moderately open-minded here.


      You don't have to be very open minded to realize they're only going to sell 500 of these things.

      Oh sure, maybe they'll sell more of them LIGHT YEARS in the future when the component costs come down into the range that will make the device profitable, but let's face it... They are only making 500 of these things right now for a reason. Apple updates the iPod every 6 months or so. Do you really think this thing will still be so "advanced" when they manage to make it widely available, or will it just be another second rate iPod with a crappy interface?

  18. Re:Again: no radio :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    All terrestrial radio (and TV) in the USA absolutely sucks. At some point the "attitude" and retarded pandering to sponsors became pase.. then it became annoying.. and people stopped listening.

    If anybody wants music on a commute - they either have a CD changer / MP3 player in the car or a subscription-based satellite radio receiver for commercial-free music.

  19. The Digital Music Player We Really Need by Long-EZ · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I wish Rio wasn't trying to be an "iPod killer" and ripping off Apple to such a large degree. Sure, Apple is good at hitting the largest segment of the market (often techno-fashionistas), but once they own that, there is a lot of room for those of us who want something else. And the laser engraving on the first 500 Rio Carbons will serve as a constant reminder that you paid 30% more to debug their beta firmware.

    I'd like to see THIS digital music player:

    Inexpensive and reliable 60+ GB notebook hard drive.

    More battery capacity, in an inexpensive, standard, replaceable battery format.

    Larger display, for my 40 something eyes.

    Standard hard drive file storage, so I can mount it and drag & drop files. Works with any OS, no special music download software needed, can serve as a portable data backup or transfer device.

    Support for all popular audio codecs, including MP3, Ogg, etc.

    No digital rights management crap. I rip my CDs and copy them to the player. Period. I don't need the RIAA in my business every time I want to copy my CD to my portable player.

    Hotswap cradle to charge the player, copy tunes and connect to external powered speakers, just like my my Karma 20.

    A good built in FM transmitter so an FM car radio can be used.

    Admittedly, most people want a "smaller is better" MP3 player, not the less expensive 2X sized device I'd like to have, but I think there's a market for it. I have no use for a 5 GB player that stores 1/3 of my CD collection. I can see a use for tiny 256 MB players for people who want a couple of albums while they run, bike, commute, etc. But I'm spoiled by carrying my entire music collection. I frequently have a chance meeting with someone and play an obscure song for them, and the odds it'd be in a 256 MB device are slim. Besides, I never know what I want to hear ahead of time.

    Bonus! Here's a free music download link from Tempus that I saw on /. Good stuff, reminiscent of Dave Mathews: http://www.tempusband.com/mp3.html

    --
    >> My ultraviolent Linux switch video.
  20. Sorry, but you're the minority by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "I'll take increased functionality or cheaper price over looks any day of the week."

    Good for you. However, most people decide based upon more subjective criteria.

    The Carbon will not kill the iPod mini - it's too ugly and the specs of iPod mini clears the "good enough" criterion without problem. I also understand that it doesn't have the sexy clickwheel thingy.

    Gadgets for Joe Average is about an experience in addition to techincal specs. The Carbon doesn't seem to have what it takes.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  21. Re:Nice Box.... by Daeyin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hmmm.... that does uniquely look just like the cube box that came with my ipod and isight. Black and white, cubed.

    I wonder if it is as cool on the inside though. I still pull out my ipod box and marvel at how wonderful a design it is (Yes, I kept the box. I'm a mac nut and a design nut; I love showing my friends whose toys usually come in brown cardboard or squeaky styrofoa)..

  22. Re:The real important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You may laugh, but that is a major selling point of the iPod, that it doesn't look like a piece of crap. Sure most geeks only care about the specs, but most other people care about looks and image, and until Rio makes a player that looks better than the iPod, it will never beat the iPod.

  23. Why, God? WHY? by Raptor+CK · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So you can engrave it.

    It comes in a stylish cardboard cube.

    It holds music on a tiny hard drive.

    It costs $250.

    It's small.

    It uses a D-Pad almost exactly like my Treo 600.

    I'm sorry, but the Treo *sucks* as a media player, and that D-Pad is the main reason *why* it sucks.

    It sounds good enough, pTunes handles all the right formats... But it's a bear to control. It's like driving an ice cream truck by gesturing emphatically.

    This could be an iPod Mini killer, but it needs a better UI.

    --
    Raptor
    "Procrastination is great. It gives me a lot more time to do things that I'm never going to do."
  24. When will they learn? by aldeng · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only caveot: I own a 4g iPod. When are people going to learn that for the majority of people it doesn't matter if it's better than the sexy little iPod in features, size or look. It's not an iPod. Apple did two things in making the iPod: They made a pretty decent product with an easy interface and they also made an image of chic youth. I'm afraid that Rio has only done 1/2 of this. Until they come out with a better marketing capaign, they simply will not unseat the iPod.

  25. How can it be a killer? by xombo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How can this be an iPod killer if only 500 are availible? Not only will it be low yield, low profit, but it doesn't stand a chance of being widely accepted. I highly doubt people will drop their iPod Mini to grab one of these things. It's not an iPod Mini killer, it simply cannot be.