Slashdot Mirror


DVD / Hard Drive Recorder With 28-Day Capacity

fenimor writes "Panasonic today unveiled new DVD-recoders with astonishing 709 hours video recording capacity. The top model has onboard components of a good PC: 400GB hard drive, Ethernet port, broadband receiver, SD Memory Card slot, and a PCMCIA card. The DVD recorder is the fastest in the industry as it can record a one-hour program onto DVD-R disc in just 56 seconds. Internet access allows users to program recording through cell phones or PCs while away from home."

48 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. burnin' by dirvish · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oooh, that will go nicely with my Netflix account. ;)

    1. Re:burnin' by Nos. · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly... I think we're going to see some decrease in sales of DVD's as products like this start becoming popular (and cheaper). How long before the MPAA attacks these sort of devices (again) especially ones like this that will allow trading of content very easily.

    2. Re:burnin' by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Does this decode CSS for you?

      If not, the MPAA doesn't care.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:burnin' by jhylkema · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Does this decode CSS for you?

      If not, the MPAA doesn't care.


      Wrong, buzzard breath. The MPAA cares a devil of a lot about any technology that enables people to view content other than through their "licensed" means. (Granted, we techies know that this is pie-in-the-sky: CSS was broken by a 15-year-old, Macrovision has been hacked already AFAIK.) Keep in mind that the movie industry fought VCRs all the way to the US Supreme Court. The case was Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, Inc. . The case headnote:

      Petitioner Sony Corp. manufactures home video tape recorders (VTR's), and markets them through retail establishments, some of which are also petitioners. Respondents own the copyrights on some of the television programs that are broadcast on the public airwaves. Respondents brought an action against petitioners in Federal District Court, alleging that VTR consumers had been recording some of respondents' copy-righted works that had been exhibited on commercially sponsored television and thereby infringed respondents' copyrights, and further that petitioners were liable for such copyright infringement because of their marketing of the VTR's. Respondents sought money damages, an equitable accounting of profits, and an injunction against the manufacture and marketing of the VTR's. The District Court denied respondents all relief, holding that noncommercial home use recording of material broadcast over the public airwaves was a fair use of copyrighted works and did not constitute copyright infringement, and that petitioners could not be held liable as contributory infringers even if the home use of a VTR was considered an infringing use. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding petitioners liable for contributory infringement and ordering the District Court to fashion appropriate relief. [Emphasis added].

      Held:

      The sale of the VTR's to the general public does not constitute contributory infringement of respondents' copyrights. [In other words, told Universal to go stuff themselves.]


      Hollyweird has yet to learn from this stinging defeat and the aftermath. Turns out that, far from decimating the industry as Jack Valenti predicted, Hollywood now makes more off of videotapes than screenings. Hollywood makes more movies than before, not fewer.

      In business, you must either adapt or die. At least for now, Hollywood has chosen not to adapt.
  2. plenty by el_salvador · · Score: 5, Funny

    of space for the sex lifes of all slashdot readers i guess

    1. Re:plenty by Oxy+the+moron · · Score: 4, Funny

      Though I was thinking that the majority of /. sex lives could be contained on the now dead floppy disk. =]

      --

      Proudly supporting the Libertarian Party.

  3. One hour in 56 seconds by jrumney · · Score: 5, Funny
    The DVD recorder is the fastest in the industry as it can record a one-hour program onto DVD-R disc in just 56 seconds.

    Easy! All it needs to do is detect and remove the ad breaks.

    1. Re:One hour in 56 seconds by Wilk4 · · Score: 3, Funny
      yeah, removing the ads from typical TV shows leaves you with just 56 seconds of video... easy to record in 56 seconds. ;-)

      seriously, doesn't 56 seconds seem like a typo? I can't copy that much video from one spot to another on my hard drive in that time... how is a DVD recorder that fast? yeah, yeah, I'll go read the article now - except that it's slashdotted ... sigh...

    2. Re:One hour in 56 seconds by jrumney · · Score: 5, Insightful
      seriously, doesn't 56 seconds seem like a typo?

      Not really. It does seem like the marketing version of the story though, as they are certainly talking about raw write time, not including compression time etc. My guess is the steps go like this:

      1. Capture one hour of TV.
      2. Possibly cheat by removing ad breaks, leaving around 40 minutes.
      3. Compress to MPEG4. Think VHS quality, not near-DVD.
      4. Defrag hard drive
      5. Start timer
      6. Write to DVD
      7. Stop timer: 56 seconds.
    3. Re:One hour in 56 seconds by Zocalo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      doesn't 56 seconds seem like a typo?

      Not at all. Since it doesn't say what level of compression was used on the one hour of video, I think it's reasonable to assume it's the one with the most. If so, and the thing can store 709 hours of video in 400GB, then that's just over half a GB of data, or about 10MB/s.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    4. Re:One hour in 56 seconds by DotDotSlasher · · Score: 4, Informative

      If it's coming out this month, they must be using a 12x DVD burner. A DVD stream is about 1MB/sec, so 12x is 12MB/sec. 56sec at 12MB/sec is 672MB per hour of video. I'm sure they have MPEG-2 streams where an hour takes up 672MB.
      But, since 400GB can store 709 hours, they must have a quality setting of about 400000MB/709hr=565MB/hr. Maybe they're allowing some overhead in their write-to-DVD time.
      So they're not recording "normal" DVD video, a typical movie is about 1MB/sec. They're saving off MPEG streams to DVD-R which save video at about 160KB/sec. Much less than DVD-quality and doesn't play back in your DVD player -- but should play in their fancy player.

  4. Cost inefficient? by scowling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK. I have a computer with video in, a DVD+-R drive and 300 GB of hard drive space. Just about anybody upgrade their system with the same for about $400. Right? A little more if you want digital video in.

    And it's user-friendly. Got a remote control and everything.

    So how much is Panasonic's system, and how would it be better for me than what I've already got.

    --
    www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    1. Re:Cost inefficient? by genericacct · · Score: 3, Insightful

      User-friendly to set up, silent, attractive. Price notwithstanding, this is an option to most consumers, most of whom have never even heard of Windows Media Center. For you, though, if your computer isn't deafening, keep what you've got.

    2. Re:Cost inefficient? by j-turkey · · Score: 5, Informative
      So how much is Panasonic's system, and how would it be better for me than what I've already got.

      I've set up a few PC-based PVR's and the TiVo and Panasonic ReplayTV's that I've used kick the crap out of them all (I haven't seen MythTV yet).

      The interface is cleaner, it's easier to use, there is very little to set up, it doesn't require a clunky PC, and integrates nicely with whatever you've got in your home entertainment system (except for HDTV).

      What can it offer you? I don't know. Maybe you're superman with your gear and can set up a seamless MythTV install in minutes. I'm not, although I have the know-how to do what I need -- and in my house, I don't even own a TV, so it's all via my personal computer. The prepackaged systems are pretty cool though -- it's a compelling package no matter who you are.

      IMO, where your PC is really cool is for things like watching DivX and other downloaded videos...trying to integrate it into a system that you can use every day. I don't mind using my OS for that -- but again, the TiVo and Replay systems are pretty compelling like that. Cheaper to run, and they just work.

      --

      -Turkey

    3. Re:Cost inefficient? by jokkebk · · Score: 2, Interesting
      apt-get install mythtv

      It isn't always as easy as this. My installation looked a bit like this:

      • emerge mythtv: 1hr (Gentoo jokes aside)
      • re-compile kernel with video: 0.5hr
      • try to get xawtv working to tune the channels - I live in Finland and need to tune mythtv frequencies manually: 2hrs of audio/video permission and other problems
      • mythsetup: 0.1hr
      • mythfilldatabase hangs after finding the first channel, no resolution available through google: 4hrs
      • manually using xmltv to get the data: 2hrs
      • trying to use xml file directly with mythfilldatabase - still hangs after reading into database: 1hr
      • manually editing mysql database: 1hr
      • starting up mythtv - permission problems: 2hrs
      • figuring out correct alsa mixer settings from mediocre installation documents: 2hrs
      • getting rid of blank screen and audio buffering errors: 3hrs
      • now that everything works, trying to figure why in the hell I cannot change channels in mythtv


      Total time: 18.6hrs

      If everything goes OK, mythtv setup is a breeze - I've done it before. But when you have audio card that only records in 48kHz and start having prebuffering problems, or live outside US where you have to do little more than use ZapIt it CAN get ugly.

      During my three workdays with MythTV most of the problems were mentioned in some web forums, but the answers proved to be few and far between. So far I've at least learned to hate the troubleshooting-section of MythTV documentation, which is about as much of use in shooting the trouble as a robot that eats flies.

      Surely a super-expert in ALSA could've solved the haunting audio problems with a flick of his wrist, but sometimes it seems like a waste of good freetime to start learning devfs and the inner workings of .asoundrc just to be able to watch TV..
      --
      http://codeandlife.com
  5. Heh by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if you can plug a webcam into one of those things. 700 hours... yep, no need to change tape too often, and that DVD burning speed will also be handy for archiving. But now you will always be able to tell your girlgriend what exactly she did at 16:34, 15 days ago.

  6. How soon till it becomes illegal? by gambit3 · · Score: 4, Funny


    Surely, we can't let these BLATANTLY piracy-inducing machines to make criminals of all our poor innocent children!!

    Quick, someone call Jack Valenti!

  7. Oh. Duh by boomgopher · · Score: 5, Funny

    I first thought "28-Day Capacity" meant the contents disappear after 28 days, and that this was just another MPAA scheme. :)

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
  8. 28 Days by Mateito · · Score: 4, Funny
    DVD / Hard Drive Recorder With 28-Day Capacity

    Obviously, to fill that capacity you'll need one of these.

    Okay... so its a dumb joke. Give me a break. I've got a chronic ear-wax build up and its giving me a migraine.

  9. How can you WATCH that much TV?!? by the_skywise · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've got a Tivo with 120 hours on it. I can't KEEP UP with it. Half the stuff "spills off" for having too many copies (I stick with the default 5 episodes max for most things) or the suggestions just time out.

    Granted, it's nice to be able to thumb through that much content when I don't feel like my normal stuff, but 700 hours worth!? (Yeah, there's always archival and keeping your DVD library on the hard drive is convenient but... c'mon... how hard is it to pull the DVD out of the case and put it into the drive?)

    1. Re:How can you WATCH that much TV?!? by bungeejumper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just got a 200 GB hard drive to throw into my ReplayTV, that'll give me 65 hours of high quality recording space. It's not that I watch a lot of TV, it's just that I like to watch TV programmes on my own time...if I record a little extra, it comes in handy whenever i get the couch potato TV-watching bug. And, do you know you can watch a 4 hour baseball game in under an hour !!! All that time they waste getting ready for a pitch ! i just hit the "skip 30 seconds button" and they still haven't thrown the pitch. Imagine a 3-2 walk...it takes like 5 minutes to get that torture over with ! Believe me, if you like sports, get a ReplayTV/Tivo...you'll know what i mean only once you've gotten it.

  10. 700 hours of TV! by Kotukunui · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great. Now all we need is some decent programs to record. I don't think there has been 700 hours of quality television in the history of the medium. (called a medium because it is neither rare nor well done - ba-dum-chhh!)

  11. Lies. The bandwidth total for a 30 min of NTSC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lies. The bandwidth total for a 30 min of NTSC is over 10 times the storage they claim is similar to a TV broadcast, expecially if the show was full of cut scenes special effects (music videos) and hi freq static.

    Advertisers love to lie by factors of 10

    Advertisers love to claim that standard VHS NTSC is three times crappier than it actually is.

    Sony loves to do it this month with their non-mp3 mp3 players specs and storage and battery life.

    Now the idiocy just keeps gettign out of hand.

    Remember the year 1991 : Hard drives from many many suppliers claimed over 100,000 hours MTBF.

    100,000 hours!!! some claimed 150,000!!! its all started with a lie that kept douobling every couple years.

    Now we have 56 second total time to burn a genuine broadcast.

    In three years they will claim 4 milliseconds.

    goddamned liars

  12. Re:How's that supposed to work? by stratjakt · · Score: 2

    It also only says it writes an hour of video in 56 seconds, but it doesn't say that it does it on DVD. How long does it take to write a CD at 48x+?

    It's not a DVD-Video disc, obviously. It's just dumping a CD-sized MPEG-4 onto the disc, or hell even less. I could make an hour-long video clip that would fit on a couple floppies, but I cant imagine it being worth watching.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  13. Finally a product that people want. by Facekhan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As to a commercial deletion feature. I will settle for a gain detector (in case you had not noticed commercials are significantly louder than the program itself) that creates a seperate chapter for commercial breaks that can be skipped easily if the viewer desires. That will satisfy the broadcasters that the commercials are being seen, while letting the users do what they have every right to do, skip the ads on recordings.

  14. Picture quality for "28 days" level will suck hard by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Informative

    My 80Gb Tivo will record 80 hours (3 1/3 days) of video at "Basic Quality," which is equivalent to a low quality VHS recording (by VHS standards). Therefore, a 400Gb hard drive, using Tivo's standards anyway, will yield 16 2/3 days of video--yet they claim 28 days at that capacity. If that is the case, the picture will suck so much that you'll have to up the recording quality level and will get much less than 28 days worth of video.

  15. This will be handy... by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    a very useful part for my electrical engineering project,
    which I will be setting up in the girl's bathroom.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  16. Re:709 hours into 400GB? by Eric+Sharkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's around 160 KB/s, not Kb/s. That works out to 1.2Mb/s, which is passable for basic quality video.

  17. Obviously Still a Beta by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Insightful
    unveiled new DVD-recoders

    And they're going to keep re-coding the thing until they get it right!

    Beta - no relationship to Betamax.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  18. Re:Typo: I think it's a DVR not DVD. by BenFranske · · Score: 2, Informative

    No! RTFA, it's a combined unit (Panasonic has other ones already availible) think DVR with the capability to burn DVDs. The article headline is correct (well maybe not about the 28 day part unless you don't mind your video looking like crap)

  19. not really by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, I doubt you can fit the pr0n collection of a single slashdotter on that 400Gb drive.

  20. Remote Programming(!) by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Internet access allows users to program recording through cell phones or PCs while away from home."

    This would be highly welcome as I'm often away from home and miss shows I might want to record, also could give peace of mind that it is programmed to record the show you really really really don't want to miss.

    Of course, it being PC-like and on the internet, I wonder how secure it is. I'd hate to got on a trip in July, hoping this is recording stages of the Tour de France and coming home to a title "SUXX0RS11 UR 0WN3D1!" and a mess of Oprah shows.

    the horror, the horror

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  21. Re:How's that supposed to work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Let's see.

    400 GB/709 HR = 577 MB per minute.

    1x DVD is about 4.8 GB/HR.
    8X DVD is 8 times faster or 600 MB per minute.

  22. Re:Picture quality for "28 days" level will suck h by BenFranske · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Excellent Picture Quality" is in the eye of the beholder. I still think that VHS looks better than SVCD OR those DIVX files you speak of. Besides, if they allow burning to DVD they are probably using MPEG2.

  23. Re:One hour (of compressed video) in 56 seconds by jfw25 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's gotta be the compression they're using. After all, they can fit 709 hours onto a 400GB disk, so an hour of video takes up about half a gigabyte -- not 4.7GB. This is not going to be an hour of full-quality video.

  24. The day the MPAA was afraid of has arrived... by borgheron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For years they've been dreading the spectre of easy conversion of DVDs to files on a computer. Now that it's *FAST* and easy they're going to be scared.

    I would expect to see more attacks against computer makers and users by the MPAA on the order of what happened/is happening with the RIAA.

    GJC

    --
    Gregory Casamento
    ## Chief Maintainer for GNUstep
  25. Re:709 hours into 400GB? by ashre · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's perfectly possible to get (pretty low quality) broadcast video into 160kB/s (Bytes not bits).

    Tivo varies from 192kB/s for its lowest quality (giving 12 and a half days on this machine) to 672kB/s for the highest (giving about 3 and a half days).

    28 days will only allow VCD quality but people put up with VHS for 20 years, and that was worse than VCD.

  26. PCMCIA by Sunkist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Personally, I am in favor of devices that carry PCMCIA because I like saying that acronym.

    --
    No, Vern. They just let him in.
  27. Think "security system" by ElForesto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's the first thing I thought of. Using these things in large security systems to keep archives would seem to be the most likely application.

    --
    There is a difference between "insightful" and "inciteful" other than spelling.
  28. Channeling Homer Simpson... by FreonTrip · · Score: 3, Funny

    56 seconds? But I want it now!

  29. I have an older model by SiliconEntity · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have an older model Panasonic DVD recorder with hard drive, the DMR-E100H. It's got a 120 GB disk which they describe as holding 160 hours. I usually record in higher quality so it holds half that or less.

    It does have a high-speed record feature and can record an hour DVD in a couple of minutes. I'm not sure how it works. Sometimes it seems like the quality is not as high when I do it like this, but maybe that's my imagination.

    I also have a TiVo and what I miss most on the Panasonic is the lack of a program guide. The best you can do is use the VCR Plus codes from TV Guide but otherwise you have to manually enter the time and channel. And the worst is, you have to manually enter the program name! Using a letter grid that you move a cursor around with the remote control! It's awful. I hate it when I record a movie with a long title, but I'm too compulsive to allow myself to abbreviate it.

    The remaining major problem is that you can't copy from a DVD to the HD, you can only go in the other direction. I'd think this was a copy protection thing, but you actually can do it if you use a DVD-RAM format disk, just not a DVD-video. So once you back up something from the HD to a DVD, you can't copy it back to re-edit it or burn to a new DVD. I don't know whether the new box will fix this.

  30. Pioneer already did this and has TiVo to boot by Whatchamacallit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Pioneer already did this and has TiVo to boot. DVR-57H DVD Recorder Player with Hard Disc Record and TiVo.

    Sure it's only 120 Hours but who really cares? I get 9 hours with a Series 1 TiVo right now and it's fine. I could upgrade it to 130 by replacing the one drive with two big one's but seriously, 9 hours is enough for me.

    I don't record movies most of the time. It's just shows that I watch and most of them are an hour.

    Frankly just waiting for both the Pioneer and Panasonic devices to drop in cost and I will buy them. But the Pioneer is $1,800.00 for 120 Hours plus you still need to subscribe to TiVo or buy a lifetime connection. I would rather buy a new PowerBook then spend the money on a new TiVo when I am still not exceeding the capacity of the series 1 unit I have now.

    Seriously, how many would really record a lot onto DVD just to avoid buying a series on DVD when it's released at the end of a season?

    Why rip movies from HBO, etc. to DVD when you could just stream it from Comcast or rent it?

    I have friends who rent and rip DVD's using 321 Studio's software. But I tell ya, it's easier for me to rent the iffy movies and buy the ones I care about. I just don't have the time to rip to DVD.

  31. Alternate product info links (thanks Google News) by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Informative
    BTW, the model number of the top model is the DMR-E500H (can't find link on Panasonic's site yet). Here's two more links with product info, both based on the press release:

    Panasonic Unveil New DVRs (includes photo)

    Panasonic Unveils New DVRs

    Important additional details I noticed:

    • will be introduced in Japanese market Sept 21 (no info on non-Japanese markets in press release)
    • recording capacity of 709 hours of video in EP mode (?)
    • offers high-speed dubbing from hard disk drive onto DVD-RAM at speeds of 40x and onto DVD-R disc up to 64x in EP mode
    • no pricing details in the press release
    --
    TO START
    PRESS ANY KEY

    Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  32. Actually... by the_skywise · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My friends don't have cable, so I Tivo a run of stuff like Bear and the Big Blue house and dump it to tape for their 1 year old kid. One tape is good for about a month. That's about how long mommy and daddy can handle seeing the same episode about 50 times before they scream at me for new stuff. I think there's probably an underground market for it...
    "Yo my man... I can score you some Bob the Builder! It's FRESH!"

  33. Uses for such a device other than recording TV by rubberbando · · Score: 2, Funny

    With its dual tuners, this would be a great addition to a video surveillance system...

    ...or a hidden camera operation. ;-)

    --
    DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
  34. Panasonic by payndz · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Panasonic's DVD recorders that I used in my (not long past) days as a tech reviewer, I rated pretty highly. Yes, they had their annoying quirks, but probably less than the equivalent Pioneer-clone units, and certainly a lot less than the Philips +RW machines. It comes down to format - Panasonic, IIRC, uses DVD-RAM, and as yet none of the three (three!) rival formats have yet established a convincing lead in the market.

    The big question is, can they still be snapped up before Broadcast Flag compatibility becomes mandatory?

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  35. Re:A 'good' PC? by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 4, Funny

    >If 'good' is 400GB, I wonder what constitutes 'great?'

    A 400 GB model that comes pre-loaded with porn.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  36. 28 days? Nooooooo... by Clark_Griswold · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I already have something that ruins my life every 28 days. Why rub salt in my wounds?

    No, Honey, really, it was a joke! Sorry! Sorry! Glaahkkk! mmmffffpppt! AIEEEEEEEE>>>

    --
    -- Mace only makes me hornier.