Slashdot Mirror


Chicago Pondering Huge Camera Network

andyring writes "According to ABC7 in Chicago, mayor Daley rolled out plans to install thousands of video cameras in public places across the Windy City. In some ways, I suppose there are positives, as all the existing and future cameras are tied in to the 911 emergency center, allowing a 911 dispatcher to actually watch the area in question when someone dials 911. Dispatchers will be able to control some of the cameras, such as panning and zooming in."

7 of 377 comments (clear)

  1. move it! by ximpul1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ironically, i got that 'nothing for you to see here, move along' a few times before this story loaded

  2. Fuckin' Daley by Naikrovek · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is also the mayor that destroyed Meigs Field under cover of night and with police protection to keep people away while he did it.

    This guy is a fucker. Underhanded bastard with no concern for the citizens of Chicago.

  3. The question... by bloggins02 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... is not whether such moves are useful. Arguably, almost all privacy-invading programs are in some way.

    The question is: do you trust the government (and the people that work for it!) to use it responsibly?

  4. I can see it now... by rackhamh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Caller: Operator, help, I'm being chased! I'm at the corner of 7th and Broad!

    Operator: Okay, I see you. Oh wait, hold on, the camera's stuck.

    Caller: Forget the damn camera, I need help!

    Operator: Maybe if I press this button... these stupid things always lock up right when you need them...

    Caller: Help! He's gaining on me!

    Operator: Hey Bob, can you come over and have a look at this? Camera 76 is stuck again.

    Bob: Yup, we should have a tech out there some time tomorrow.

    Caller: Aaaaaaaaaaaaaauuuuugggggh!

  5. Re:I for one... by Caedar · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one welcome our new REPETITIVE OVERUSED JOKE overlords! (Please, for the love of god, don't mod my comment up as funny. That's only encouraging them.)

  6. Re:Privacy in public by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    As much can be achieved by photographing/filming them :
    You could also replace the 'protestors' with 'criminals' and your point makes alot less sense.

    I think placing cameras , if properly used by lawenforcements / third parties, can only contribute to cleaning up some foul areas (as seen from first hand experience , in a bad neighbourhood in Rotterdam, the Netherlands) and might come in handy when they are in fact used for 'inspecting the area/accident' in case of an emergency.

    I'm all for privacy ; but it is, and will be , a -public- place : Then again, i think drastic measures like this, should only be done after the city has made a vote for it in a 'referendum' (i am not sure if this is an english word) ; more or less a poll amongst the citizens of the city.

  7. How is this any different? by RexRhino · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OK, so it might sound 1984ish to have cameras everyone in public. Certainly it makes me nervous. But how is this survailence worse than what the IRS has been doing for the last 20 years at least? The IRS is already entitled to every bank and ATM transaction, every credit card transaction, a record of all the charities you give to, a record of all income you make, and if you are a buisness, a record of everything you spend your money on. All this long before The Patriot Act or 9/11 or George W Bush or the War on Terror / War on Drugs.

    Certainly tracking a person's every financial transaction is far more dangerous to democracy - (Did you order those movie tickets to Farienheit 9/11 by phone? The government has a record! Did you donate to the Green Party, or the Natural Law Party, or The Libertarian Party? Who you vote for might be secret ballot, but the government knows who you donated to! Did you fly out and rent a hotel to participate in a protest? The government knows! Pay by credit card for your web server? Don't think your controversial political web blog can't be traced to you!).

    You never hear a peep from so called "Civil Libertarians" about what I mentioned above... probably because challenging the complete and total financial survailence of every American means that it would be hard to tax people, and be hard to pay for those expensive government entitlement programs that have so effectivly eliminated poverty, racism, and war (yeah right!).

    Having cameras in public places is more akin to having a police officer on every corner. Yes, it can (and probably will) be abused... but people are regularly abused by Police officers without using any hidden cameras. And at least in public places, there is the understanding that you are in public and can't expect total privacy.

    It seems to me that people are OK with Big Brother, so long as Big Brother will give us the illusion of "freedom". The government can know everything single detail about your political, social, and economic life. But god forbid they catch you on camera picking your nose or something!