Slashdot Mirror


60 Years Later: The V2 And The Space Race

securitas writes "In a two-part feature written sixty years after the V2 rocket was first launched on London, BBC News Online's Paul Rincon describes the Soviet-American space race, German V2 rocket technology and how the USSR and USA divided Germany's best scientists between them. The second part addresses the technological lineage of both space programs, the creation of NASA, intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) development and the V2's legacy. Another feature provides some context, following the history of the development of the V2 rocket from its precursors that began with space flight enthusiasts like Wernher von Braun and Walter Riedel, through its use as a terrifying weapon in the London Blitz, to the recruitment drive by the Americans and Soviets. Today the V2 rocket is being used as the basis for the Canadian Arrow X Prize team. The Arrow team has some pages on V2 history and the main engine thrust chamber. For those interested you can read more at the A4 / V2 Rocket Resource site."

196 comments

  1. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with all the information about the V2 arround the North Koreans now have a means of delivery!

  2. Nazi Germany by u-238 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and the births of (von Braun, Riedel, etc.) its ethos single handedly launched the world into the space age.

    Never forget that.

    1. Re:Nazi Germany by jolyonr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only thing Nazi Germany wanted to do was build new technical devices to kill people - the fact that their ballistic missies had peaceful applications is space flight was noted by the scientists at the time, and much theoretical work was done by German scientists in the war (eg Sanger), but it remained in their minds and on paper. All the Nazis wanted were devices capable of killing more people at a greater distance. That was their ethos.

      --


      Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    2. Re:Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nazi Germany and the births of (von Braun, Riedel, etc.) its ethos single handedly launched the world into the space age.

      I propose that pro-Nazi trolling be referred to as 'goose-stepping'.

    3. Re:Nazi Germany by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      and the births of (von Braun, Riedel, etc.) its ethos single handedly launched the world into the space age.

      Yeah. Pretty good for war criminals using slave labour.

      The US protected war criminal von Braun in order to outrace the Soviets.

      A (possibly apocryphal) story goes that one time after the war, von Braun's plane, flying from Europe to the US, developed mechanical troubles and the pilot was about to divert to England, when von Braun informed him that he, von Braun, was still subject to arrest in the United Kingdom for War Crimes.

    4. Re:Nazi Germany by StuckInSyrup · · Score: 1

      Yes, and not only that.
      If the Nazi won the WW2, the most of us wold be launched straight to heaven.

      --
      Ni.
    5. Re:Nazi Germany by u-238 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The American and English textile industry of the 17/1800's was built upon slavery, slavery which was justified by a racist belief of superiority held by the oppressors (ethnic Europeans).

      The Americans and the English murdered between 300,000 and 500,000 innocent German civilians not participating in the war, on the 13th of February 1945, after the war had been lost, on Dresden.

      They then proceeded to kidnap scientists and exploit them for their own perverted interpritations on how rocket science should be used.

      But, hey, with the likes of GPS and cell phones, they did do pretty good with this gift from Germany.
      Pretty good for war criminals using slave labour and kidnapped intellectuals.

    6. Re:Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it is that much better to harbour nazis so you can win a silly space race.

    7. Re:Nazi Germany by u-238 · · Score: 2

      My point still stands.

    8. Re:Nazi Germany by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only thing Nazi Germany wanted to do was build new technical devices to kill people

      Antropomorphisms like this are dangerous. It's so tempting to say "Russia wants to conquer Tschetschenya" or "USA want to justify Guantanamo to the public opinion", but you should always remember there is no such person as Uncle Sam or Mother Russia. Whatever George W. Bush wants or needs, it's not necessarily what every American or even majority of Americans want or need. It's also dangerous when you talk about dictatorship, as there was more in Third Reich than just Hitler and his crazy followers. What we know about Werner von Braun is that he was interested in rocket science "as such" - his lifelong dream was a manned mission to Mars. He worked for Hitler not because he loved him, but simply because for a German rocket scientist in 1940's there weren't really any other options. When you say "That was their ethos" you should consider who do you mean by "they". Them-Nazis? Sure, you're right. Them-German scientitst? You are obviously wrong.

    9. Re:Nazi Germany by jolyonr · · Score: 1

      You have a good point, and my original post should have been clearer. I was certainly refering to the Nazi leadership (and that whole concept of a 'nazi ethos'), and not directly to the german scientists - many of whom did plan and dream for peaceful uses of their technology, but it was not until the Nazis were defeated that they were able to work directly to achieve this (although of course even after the war their initial work was to help develop the first ICBMs).

      --


      Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    10. Re:Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also set the wheels in motion to create a new superpower nation that will eventually bombard another country and kill and torture its citizens, just for some oil.

      Never forget that.

    11. Re:Nazi Germany by Yokaze · · Score: 1

      Crap.

      von Braun would have been working on rockets regardless of Nazis in power or not. The difference is that the Nazis prohibited civilian research on rocketry (prohibiting the "Verein fuer Raumschiffahrt").
      Another point is that all those people (von Braun, Einstein, Born, Hilbert, Minkowski, Heisenberg...) are products of an education of pre-Nazi Germany.

      Not to mention all those people who worked in Germany, because of those outstanding scientists.
      Before the Nazi-regime, practically all papers in Chemistry of any importance where published in German. Oppenheimer made his PhD under Max Born in Germany.

      Makes you wonder, what Germany might have contributed to the world when the goverment wouldn't have focused their efforts of killing people among them a great deal of the German intelligencia on reason of religion, sexual or political orientation.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    12. Re:Nazi Germany by u-238 · · Score: 1

      The 2nd BBC arcile writes, in classic British eloquence, a point similar to what I intended to make, and one that is overlooked by Holocaust zealots and "if it has the word NAZI in it it must be bad" ignoramuses alike:


      "Our enlightened view of the Universe, the subtle everyday enhancements in our lifestyle enabled by satellite communications, as well as the phenomenon of push-button warfare - they all trace a line to Peenemuende."

    13. Re:Nazi Germany by TGK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is not flamebait! The Nazi regime was an Evil one with horrific purpose, but to condem the German people as a whole for its crimes is tantamount to condeming all Southerners for the acts of the KKK.

      The Nazi regime ruled Germany through terror tactics. Without doubt, the attacks on the German industral base were founded and necessary attacks to cripple the industrial power of the German State. The attack on Dresden (a protected city and a refugee camp) was not necessary, nor was it honorable. We hit Dresden because the Germans hit Coventry. We carried out the raid because we knew the Germans were going to hit Covernty and couldn't act on that information without giving away the breaking of Enigma. We did it because we were angry.

      War is a horrible thing. The Nazi regime was a horrible thing. This does not excuse the Allies' actions at Dresden. There is a difference between war and murder. In war they enemy can shoot back. Dresden was a strictly civilian target.

      To be fair, most of the Scientists we tood weren't kidnapped so much as given a choice. The choice wasn't a very good one, and it didn't make the US or the USSR look terribly good in the eyes of the world, but it was a choice. The weapons these individuals helped make killed a lot of people. While the individual german laborer had little impact on the war and could not realisticly make much of a difference, those at the top helping develop the Nazi superweapons were capable of making a huge difference. Their decision to stay in Germany and comply with the requests of the Nazi goverment made them colaborators. In exchange for their services we were willing to overlook that whole "being a Nazi" problem.

      I'm not sure what you mean by slave labor, in your previous context. The US did not, to the best of my knowledge, use slave labor in the development of its space program. Of course, the early days of the US economy were fed from the tit of Slavery. While US slavery was not nearly as brutal as the practices employed by the Europeans in the Carribian, it was and is a disgrace and a black mark in the history of this country. It's hard to draw a line from that to the space program though.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    14. Re:Nazi Germany by u-238 · · Score: 1, Troll

      When you say "That was their ethos" you should consider who do you mean by "they". Them-Nazis? Sure, you're right. Them-German scientitst? You are obviously wrong.

      I'll refer you to Johannes Stark's Nationalsocialismus und Wissenschaft (1934).

      Research on this topic will lead you to the pre-existing conclusion that your argument and assertions are wrong, and that in all logical senses my statement is sound and correct.

    15. Re:Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave, you're wrong. With the war all but lost, Von Braun and his engineers deliberated over where to go, East or South. They chose to go South. With conflicting orders coming in daily Von Braun ignored the orders that were contrary to their plans and waited for a set that were aligned with their plans. When those finally came in he packed up documents and plans and his engineers and went South and surrendered to the Americans.

      Economically, the Americans were the best bet for these engineers to continue practical work. Remember, Britain was devastated economically by the war, the best they could hope for would be to spend their days talking about what they could do. With the Americans they could have some hope to actually do what they wished to do.

      Politically, Britain wouldn't exactly have been a welcoming place for a bunch of Nazis who had spent the war building devices to terrorize the British public.

    16. Re:Nazi Germany by u-238 · · Score: 1

      I was merely satarizing the pointless and inane rhetoric of my parent, and providing a fresh breath of perspective to a largely ignorant and monumentally subjective and biased audience (on this subject).

      Thanks for noticing.

    17. Re:Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this trolling? The facts are quite clear - nazi technology is partly responsible for the space race happening when it did. If you don't like history, I guess you are free to revise it and pretend it didn't happen.

      If you believe that's what the OP was trying to communicate you are a dunce. Look at his username and the emphasis. Either you (1) have no critical reading skills or (2) agree with the connotation of the OP.

      Let me give you a similar example:
      Don't forget, the enslavement of Africans is partly responsible for the American domination of Olympic Track and Field events.

      Unless you are trying to argue that the ends justify the means, there is NO REASON to mention something so inflamitory.

      You might also mention that the NAZIs gathered great amounts of medical information by experimenting on people. Google produces the following list:

      A) High-Altitude Experiments
      B) Freezing Experiments
      C) Malaria Experiments
      D) Lost (Mustard) Gas Experiments
      E) Sulfanilamide Experiments
      F) Bone, Muscle, and Nerve Regeneration and Bone Transplantation Experiments
      G) Sea-Water Experiments
      H) Epidemic Jaundice Experiments
      I) Sterilization Experiments
      J) Spotted Fever (Fleckfieber) Experiments
      K) Experiments with Poison
      L) Incendiary Bomb Experiments

      You're a fucking moron if you don't acknowledge the OP's intent.

    18. Re:Nazi Germany by dave420 · · Score: 1
      Exactly - Britain would have tried him as the war criminal he was, not give him a huge budget to continue the work born out of terrorism. I mean come on - the guy did his best to kill people. You can bang on about how he just wanted to build rockets, but that doesn't mean he shouldn't have been accountable for his actions.

      It's just another shining example of US hypocrisy. War criminals are OK, if they have something to offer. It doesn't matter what they've done in the past, apparently.

      And you didn't comment about the US stealing the V2 rockets destined for Britain and Russia...

    19. Re:Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was merely satarizing the pointless and inane rhetoric of my parent, and providing a fresh breath of perspective to a largely ignorant and monumentally subjective and biased audience (on this subject).

      Your intentions are incredibly transparent. Most people (especially here) acknowledge that NAZI scientists made great contributions to science. So what's your point? Oh, you mean to suggest there was something redeeming about the NAZIs. Well, I guess that depends on whether GPS matters more than human life.

      To participate in such a society is to offer one's tacit consent for that society's actions. Your NAZI scientists aren't heros, no matter how significant their discoveries.

    20. Re:Nazi Germany by mjbkinx · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'll refer you to Johannes Stark's Nationalsocialismus und Wissenschaft (1934).

      a quick search on him revealed that he tried to differ between "jewish physics" (theroretical) and "arayan physics" (experimental).
      he also referred to heisenberg and planck as "white jews".

      i'm also pretty sure he would have spelled "Nationalsozialismus" with a "z".

    21. Re:Nazi Germany by TheEqualizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All the V2's killed just about 4000 people, but in the process wasted innumerable resources that might have otherwise been spend on manufacturing ammunitions, airplanes and tanks that had a much better kill ratio per work hour invested, V2 was actually lousy as a weapon because of its immense costs. Only reason why it existed was because Albert Speer made it for some reason his own pet project and sold the idea to Hitler. The whole project cost about ½ of the US Manhattan project, but of the kill ratio was underwhelming low. Now the good deal happened post war when US and CCCR combined the nuke with the rocket and got nuclear ballistic missiles. Hitler's biggest mistake was the fact he never used chemical weapons, allied intelligence was in fact terrified of idea of German subs being modified to carry V-2, thus opening the possibility of chemical attack on say New York or Washington.

    22. Re:Nazi Germany by Bromrrrrr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, did you take that from a Nazi propaganda poster about jews or something?

      Anyway, was there anything incorrect about what the grandparent said?

      --

      What a rotten party, have we run out of beer or something?
    23. Re:Nazi Germany by jolyonr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What was interesting is that it was the British, not the Germans, who were closer to using chemical weapons during the second world war, which would have been a tremendous mistake as at the time British chemical weaponry relied primarily on WW1 vintage mustard gas, whereas the germans had perfected and produced stocks of nerve gas agents.

      Churchill wanted to drop chemical weapons on German cities in retaliation for the V1/V2 raids, but fortunately was persuaded against it. If the Germans had used chemical munitions against the Normandy landings, it is highly likely they would have failed.

      Ref: History of Chemical Warfare(2)

      --


      Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    24. Re:Nazi Germany by mjbkinx · · Score: 2
      Here he is in all his glory ladies and gentlemen, the Google-scholar.

      unfortunately it is impossible to remember all the racist crap that was said throughout history.

      but fyi: my other reply to your revisionist post further up was completely out of memory. i'm german, so i don't need a spell checker to know how to spell "Nationalsozialismus".
      do you have any comments on that?

    25. Re:Nazi Germany by TheEqualizer · · Score: 1

      Not using Germany's advanced gas was Hitler's biggest mistake, in an all out war, it was the only sane thing to do, but somehow he didn't have the guts do it, which is mind-boggling considering all other kinds of atrocities he allowed and sponsored. Had he used gas against Normandy and Kursk or Stalingrad, he'd have won the war.

    26. Re:Nazi Germany by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      Russia wants to conquer Tschetschenya

      um...where? I'm sure everyone realizes you're talking about Chechnya or (Slashdot is filtering out my windows-1251 encoded chars) and not some German republic somewhere, but I thought I would point it out so no one is confused.

    27. Re:Nazi Germany by bhima · · Score: 1

      Actually I thought it was spelled with a 'i' not a 'y' or 'Czeczenia' if you are from around here.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    28. Re:Nazi Germany by gadget+junkie · · Score: 1

      as far as I recall, Hitler positively loathed chemical or biological weapons, an heritage of his involvement in WWI. Apparently he positively forbid their use.

      --
      "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
    29. Re:Nazi Germany by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      The facts are that both Britian and NATO gladely accepted WMD delivery vehicles born out of the the ex-NAZI rocket programs.

      Pan

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    30. Re:Nazi Germany by red+floyd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure why he didn't use it, but it may have to do with his own personal experience from WWI. Hitler was the victim of a gas attack during WWI.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    31. Re:Nazi Germany by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Of course that would have meant that Britain had to talk about their terror bombings that killed many times as many people.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    32. Re:Nazi Germany by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      Personally, I have sometimes been guilty of google scholarship but I wrote an essay on the subject of "Aryan physics" a few years ago for a class so I do know a little about this ... and yes, the GP was correct. Some scientists did share the goals of the Nazis, some were at best indifferent. It's a myth to suppose that scientists are somehow morally insulated from politics, just because nature is. (In particular, I'm sick of Heisenberg being whitewashed - he was a great physicist, but he couldn't see any moral difference between Nazi Germany and the western democracies, and his atomic weapons program failed because of his mistakes, not because he was trying to stop Hitler from getting the bomb.) On the other hand, by the early years of the war, the proponents of "aryan physics" had fairly decisively lost out in their battle to take over German physics, so even in Nazi Germany one could argue that objective physics won out.

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    33. Re:Nazi Germany by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      I've never bought that argument, because it never stopped him from using gas on Jews, homosexuals, the disabled, and any other "undesirables". If there are any records of Hitler saying that it had to do with his personal experiences then I'd like to see them ... eg maybe he had an opinion of the Italian use of gas during the Abyssinian war.

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    34. Re:Nazi Germany by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1
      We hit Dresden because the Germans hit Coventry. We carried out the raid because we knew the Germans were going to hit Covernty and couldn't act on that information without giving away the breaking of Enigma. We did it because we were angry.

      Sources? Coventry was in 1941, Dresden in 1945. I can't see that the one had anything directly to do with the other - 4 years is a long time to be angry when there was so much other stuff going on, including much other bombing of German cities in the meantime.

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    35. Re:Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "n the other hand, by the early years of the war, the proponents of "aryan physics" had fairly decisively lost out in their battle to take over German physics, so even in Nazi Germany one could argue that objective physics won out. "

      er, no. By that stage most of Germany's best physicists had packed up and left.

      One reason the Japanese A-bomb program got further than the Germans; they didn't suffer such a haemmorage (sp?)

    36. Re:Nazi Germany by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Note: I'm Jewish.

      That said, I didn't know why he never used it. I simply brought that up as a hypothetical possibility.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    37. Re:Nazi Germany by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1
      Er, yes, but there were still a lot of good ones left - ever heard of Heisenberg? Weizsacker? Hahn? Von Laue? Gerlach? Planck? Jordan? Do you think Einstein would have written to Roosevelt pleading for the US to develop a bomb before Germany did if he had thought those physicists who stayed were a pack of second-raters?

      But anyway, what has that got to do with the point you quoted? The "aryan physicists" failed to take over German physics (by which I mean the physics community as a whole, not just the nuclear research program) - they had failed to secure the support of the Nazi leaders (even Himmler, ever the pseudoscience buff, came down on Heisenberg's side over the "white Jew" affair) and after securing Sommerfeld's chair for one of their own in 1939 - the high tide mark for aryan physics - generally failed to win any more institutional or bureaucratic battles. And the reason is that, eg, aircraft design has more to do with aerodynamics than ideology. No good being racially sound if your fighters fall out of the sky. BUT, whether or not the best had already left Germany before then is irrelevent to the fact that the aryan physicists were in fact defeated by the modernists, whether second-rate or no.

      I can't say much aboutFor a starting reference, see Alan Beyerchen, Scientists under Hitler: Politics and the Physics Community in the Third Reich (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1977).

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    38. Re:Nazi Germany by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I'm just saying it's a theory I have seen before that seems dubiously psychological (and oh how Hitler attracts dubious psychological theorising). I'm a history grad student, I'd like to see contemporary evidence is all.

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    39. Re:Nazi Germany by Bromrrrrr · · Score: 1

      I don't think anybody is trying to say differently, I know I wasn't. Scientists are a cross-section of society so I'd certainly expect to find Nazi ideologues among them in Nazi Germany.

      What u-238 seems to be implying in this and other threads, is that their scientific accomplishments are a direct result of their ideologies, I certainly object to that and pointing to a disgruntled Nazi scientist as proof doesn't win any points with me.

      --

      What a rotten party, have we run out of beer or something?
    40. Re:Nazi Germany by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is certaintly a distinct whiff of something unpleasant about u-238's posts taken in toto ... OTOH, as far as I am concerned the post I was objecting to was this one, particulary where it says When you say "That was their ethos" you should consider who do you mean by "they". Them-Nazis? Sure, you're right. Them-German scientitst? You are obviously wrong. It's not obviously wrong that scientists could share the Nazi ethos, because some scientists were Nazis too. But I would agree that science under the Nazis didn't progess because of Nazi ideology, if that's u-238's intention, it progressed despite it. At most, some sciences made progress because they were heavily supported by the regime for their military potential, but that's not little to do with ideology per se, it could have happened under any non-Nazi German government involved in total war. Rockets certaintly aren't specifically Nazi.

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    41. Re:Nazi Germany by jolyonr · · Score: 1

      I believe his fear of using gas was possibly due to his experiences in the first world war, not because of any moral revulsion in using the weapon against others, but simply his fear of being affected if a retalitory gas attack hit berlin. I can imagine his paranoia of thinking 'is this bunker really gas-proof? Is there a tiny gap it could leak in through?'

      --


      Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    42. Re:Nazi Germany by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1
      I hadn't thought of it like that, that's more plausible - still, I'd want contemporary evidence. If he had such a pathological fear of gas there should be some evidence in all his rantings and ravings.

      I have also heard it suggested that he mistakenly thought the Allies also had the more deadly types of nerve agents that Germany had already developed, and so feared retaliation, not so much for his own life but for the destruction it would cause to Germany. But then again, he never showed much concern for Germany's well-being on other occasions, and towards the end was more than happy for his adopted country to burn along with him. So why didn't he ever use it as a weapon of last resort? It's all a mystery to me ...

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    43. Re:Nazi Germany by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, an American scientist by the name of Robert Goddard built the first liquid fueled rocket. This rocket was the design that Von Braun and others than used to build their V2 designs.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  3. If this is your cup of tea... by davesag · · Score: 3, Informative

    If this is your cup of tea then please read "Gravity's Rainbow" by Thomas Pynchon. [google].

    --
    I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
    1. Re:If this is your cup of tea... by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 1
      If this is your cup of tea then please read "Gravity's Rainbow" by Thomas Pynchon. [google].
      You know, when I first heard about contestants using V2-derived launch vehicles, I had two thoughts:

      1 - Where did they get enough Imipolex G?

      and

      2 - Wasn't the Schwartsgerat a single-seater? Or did it actually refer to the pilot? It's been too long since I read it.

      In a move from the humourous to the wildly off-topic and karma-burning, I got within 60 pages of the end and just lost interest and just stopped reading. Normally I never do that, but I just couldn't read any more of it - which is interesting, considering I used to use American Psycho and a crazy grin to guarantee an empty seat next to me on public transport...

    2. Re:If this is your cup of tea... by davesag · · Score: 1
      I got within 60 pages of the end and just lost interest and just stopped reading.

      you didn't miss much - but i still can't believe that after making it thru the first 700 odd pages you gave up so close to the end. sure it's a rambling shaggy dog tale, but it's much less boring that american psycho.

      --
      I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
    3. Re:If this is your cup of tea... by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 2, Funny
      you didn't miss much

      Hey! Fickt nicht mit der Raketemensch! Seriously, though, I read GR about 10 times, and it made more sense (and was more enjoyable and impressive) each time, except for the 8th. :-)

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    4. Re:If this is your cup of tea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes --- I'm a 2 or 3 timer and I always keep thinking --- is it time for another read?

      "A screaming this way comes"

  4. Launched where? by Laebshade · · Score: 0, Troll
    sixty years after the V2 rocket was first launched on London
    I hope London didn't take offense to be bombed 60 years ago.
    1. Re:Launched where? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
      I hope London didn't take offense to be bombed 60 years ago.
      I thing they did, because that's exactly what happened. That was what the V2 was for...
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Launched where? by elf-fire · · Score: 1

      Well it did. Off course. War has never been quite the same since...

    3. Re:Launched where? by elf-fire · · Score: 1

      Ahum, the extra 'f' is wrong in more than one way here...

    4. Re:Launched where? by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      Um, is this a troll or are you absolutely ignorent of the second world war?

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    5. Re:Launched where? by Laebshade · · Score: 2

      Actually, I am ignorant. I apologize for the ignorant statement (I hate history). I thought it was a mistype in the post and didn't realize it was actually correct.

    6. Re:Launched where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wow. Somebody on Slashdot actually apologised for a post that made a mistake. I think this will herald in a new era of the internet.

    7. Re:Launched where? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      It's even more amazing. He admitted that he lacked knowledge in a subject area (history)!

      Of course, his ignorance of history didn't stop him from posting in the first place, so we can all breath a little easier.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  5. my parents by spectrokid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    told me on how they were afraid of the V2. The V1 made a loud humming noise and only became dangerous when the engine stopped. The V2 was faster than sound, meaning no advanced warning. It just went boom.

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    1. Re:my parents by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2, Informative
      The V2 was faster than sound, meaning no advanced warning.
      It was a ballistic missile, and when the rocket came down the engine would already have burned out, that's why it was silent.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:my parents by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Informative

      But it was ALSO supersonic even after burnout till impact because of its ballistics.
      Ever heard a mortar shell hitting something? It hasnt ANY kind of engine, but you can hear the whine of the projectile 10-20 seconds before impact

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:my parents by dave420 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the fact it was travelling at 4,000mph+ might have had something to do with its silence...

  6. Does it mention by hummassa · · Score: 0, Troll

    The fact that the V1s and V2s were made with slave juden work?

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:Does it mention by colmore · · Score: 1

      Yes, the end of the article goes into the investigations of the war records of America's German scientists that occurred in the 70s and 80s.

      I've always thought that was a little unfair of us. Sure, they committed a grave moral crime in using concentration camp labor, but it's very convenient of us to only care about that after we've used them for every bit of knowledge and skill they had and the space program was on coast. If the information had become public in the 50s or 60s, I imagine the government would have instead done its best to cover it up. Actually, come to think of it, that probably did occur to some degree or another.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    2. Re:Does it mention by u-238 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which entirely negates the credit of Germany with fathering rocket science, right?

    3. Re:Does it mention by CdBee · · Score: 1

      With your /. username being what it is, are you declaring a preference? ;-)

      No, I'm not trolling and I don't have time to get into the argument about wheter scientific knowledge carries a stain from the way it was acquired - that one could run and run.

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    4. Re:Does it mention by u-238 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The American and English textile industry of the 17/1800's was built upon slavery, slavery which was justified by a racist belief of superiority held by the oppressors (ethnic Europeans).

      Notice the similarities between ours and the Nazi's use of slave labor?

      All forms of media, paintings, images and text depicting as well as any remaining clothing artifacts from that time period should be burned, shunned, and banned from the public and private domain.

      Kinda like how Nazi artifacts are in Germany right now.

      You support this idea, I presume? Else you are ignorant, and a hypocrite.

    5. Re:Does it mention by donscarletti · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the article is about the scientific development, not the actual construction. And I think the fact that they were constructed with slave labour is fairly irrelivant since they would have been evil weapons even if they were created by well-payed union workers with health benifits, dental care and 8 weeks holiday a year.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    6. Re:Does it mention by donscarletti · · Score: 1
      u-238 is the most common and stable isotope of uranium... what the hell does that have to do with rockets, germany and slave labour?

      Does He-4 denote a preference to pepsi over coke... if so maybe W-184 means someone may vote conservative and Au-197 could mean that someone is inclined to be biased in favour of wearing boxers rather than jocks.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    7. Re:Does it mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U-238 was also a german ww2 sub, but so was just about any U-xxx combination you can think of, so it seems like a very unlikely explanation for the user name...

    8. Re:Does it mention by u-238 · · Score: 1

      U-238 was also a german ww2 sub, but so was just about any U-xxx combination you can think of, so it seems like a very unlikely explanation for the user name...

      donscarletti had it right the first time. He was also right about my name not denoting some arbitrary preference to anything. Just listen to him.

    9. Re:Does it mention by CdBee · · Score: 1

      lol.. for some reason I completely forgot about that. In the context of a discussion about WW2 weapons I read your name as a U-boot identification code.

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    10. Re:Does it mention by dave420 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Troll? What-the-fuck EVER. It's an incredibly important fact to remember about these weapons. I dare say some are slightly miffed that the pride and joy of US techincal ability first started out as a Nazi weapon built by jewish slave labour. I can't say I'm too surprised, though I was hoping for more.

    11. Re:Does it mention by TheEqualizer · · Score: 1

      Not really Jewish labour, Eastern European labour. Poles and Russian POW's. 30 million Russians died in the WW2, just 10 million were soldiers, about 5 million Poles died, that's the forgotten Holocaust.

    12. Re:Does it mention by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Lots of those Polish people were jewish, remember. Towards the end of the war, pretty much everyone was being used as slave labour by the Germans. It seems slave labour is a great way for a country to be productive. One has to look at the benefits the US received through slave labour to see its effectiveness.

    13. Re:Does it mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually 6 milion Polish citizens, about half of them was Jewish.

    14. Re:Does it mention by TheEqualizer · · Score: 1

      Germans lost the productivity War because of one single thing, they didn't want to employ women like Soviets did, that's why Soviets, although with a lower industrial base, out-produced them, another thing was that Germans switched to wartime economy only in 1943... far too late. Use of slave labor wasn't too productive, as the slave-workers had no incentive to work effectively and with quality. This resulted in sub-pair products.

    15. Re:Does it mention by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Use of slave labor wasn't too productive, as the slave-workers had no incentive to work effectively and with quality. This resulted in sub-pair products. [I'm sure you mean sub par.

      But to amplify your comment, countless lives were saved because many slave laborers actively sabotaged production. Slave laborers in munition factories that survived the war reported that they did all they could to deliver duds.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  7. Scud by CdBee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's my understanding that the Russian "Scud" rockets so beloved of wannabe regional powers are also V-2 derived.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  8. The best Germans by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wasn't that the answer given, when the US president demanded to know how the Russians got Sputnik up before the Americans managed a similar feat? "Because their Germans are better than our Germans".

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    1. Re:The best Germans by hype7 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Wasn't that the answer given, when the US president demanded to know how the Russians got Sputnik up before the Americans managed a similar feat? "Because their Germans are better than our Germans".


      They might be a bit deluded when they think of themselves as a master race (well, only some of them do) but if they were to qualify it as a "master engineering race" then I think there'd be a lot less of us that would argue with it. From rockets to cars, they are excellent engineers.

      If you are interested in "our" Germans from the parent's statement, do a google on "operation paperclip". It's very interesting... the US program to extract as many German scientists out of post-Nazi Germany as possible.

      -- james
      PS I mean to stir no racial tension by the use of "master race", merely referring to the use of a very well known phrase
    2. Re:The best Germans by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Informative

      close, but backwards (bottom of page)

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    3. Re:The best Germans by u-238 · · Score: 1

      Superiority is relative. To them, the mastry of wordly and materialistic was a paramount in the judging of a man's worth.

      There is no way to prove who is superior over-all, beacuse it is all relative to the individual juding superiority. But there can be no doubt in their engineering (worldy, materialistic and mechanical ability) superiority over the rest of the world.

      If they had used this superiority to prostrate the rest of the world into bondage, they would have earned the title "Master race". And they almost did.

    4. Re:The best Germans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Master engineering race"? So if I take baby Germans and let them grow up in another country, say Jamaica, they will still turn into master engineers? I think not. I believe you meant "master engineering culture" as in people who grow up in German families and German culture are more apt to become master engineers.

    5. Re:The best Germans by shplorb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Germans are definately the master race. I mean, they've got freakin' laws that make it illegal to brew crappy beer!

    6. Re:The best Germans by someme2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      They might be a bit deluded when they think of themselves as a master race (well, only some of them do) but if they were to qualify it as a "master engineering race" then I think there'd be a lot less of us that would argue with it. From rockets to cars, they are excellent engineers.

      I AM AN EXCELLENT ENGINEER! I am an excellent engineer! By genetics!!!1!! I genetically r00l!11! Imagine a Beowulf cluster of myself!!!11!! My engineering genes racially own you!

      Hey wait, my car... broke down... yesterday... on masterly-engineered Autobahn... my Volkswagen... I checked... couldn't find problem... d00d comes along... Is from Turkey... Looks at motor... does fiddling... car running again... Does not compute! Gene failure!!!!!1!!

      I must have been adopted!!!

      (True story, though).

      --
      You can attach boosters to anything. It just costs more. -
      Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 07, @12:26PM
    7. Re:The best Germans by mjbkinx · · Score: 2, Informative
      To them, the mastry of wordly and materialistic was a paramount in the judging of a man's worth.

      nonsense.
      being a member of the "master race" was inherited by "blood".
      there were tests based on physical characteristics to determine the percentage of "purity".

    8. Re:The best Germans by mikrorechner · · Score: 3, Insightful
      They might be a bit deluded when they think of themselves as a master race (well, only some of them do)
      Next time, will you please write a sentence like that in the past tense? Thank you very much.

      I assure you, right now there are no more people in Germany thinking of themselves as the "master race" than there are people in the US thinking of their nation as superior to others.

      Oh, wait...
      --
      "Oh, a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-my-own-Grandpa." - Dr Hubert Farnsworth
    9. Re:The best Germans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can brew whatever you want, you just can't call it beer if it dosn't fit certain critiria.

      google for Reinheitsgebot, IIRC it is the oldst set of ruls of consumer protection.

    10. Re:The best Germans by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Because the US could build smaller, lighter nuclear warheads than the Soviets. The Soviets had rockets large enough to throw Sputnik up because they had larger payloads to deal with.

    11. Re:The best Germans by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I worked for two of the Paperclippers as an Air Force lieutenant, doing a Master's thesis project on an ion-stream space propulsion gizmo at Wright-Patterson AFB in 1964. The head of the lab was Hans von Ohain, who invented the jet engine at the same time as Frank Whittle in England, although they didn't know about each other...my thesis advisor was Herr Erich Soehngen. He was a Herr instead of a Doktor because -- I am not making this up -- the Eighth Air Force bombed his homework.

      Yes, a lot of our technology owes its existence to war, especially in the 20th century. War was the central fact of our existence, and we lavished our genius and our treasure on it, and tried to deal with the human sacrifice. Well, now that crop of bastards is gone, and we still have the spaceships, high-speed airplanes, and even my lovely German-built sailplane, whose roots date back to a covert program that trained a cadre of pilots for the Luftwaffe. As Jesse Owens said on revisiting the Olympic stadium in Berlin in his old age, "I'm here. Hitler isn't. That about sums it up."

      rj

    12. Re:The best Germans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >From rockets to cars, they are excellent engineers.
      I think several countries can boast technical achievements on a scale that rivals the German's innovation in 1800's-1940's technologies.

      > if they were to qualify it as a "master engineering race" then I think there'd be a lot less of us that would argue with it.

      I'd argue... How about the semiconductor, transistor, tubes, stereo, microprocessor, cell phone, television, software invention, ethernet (and networking in general) and innovation, most of which the germans had little or nothing to do with inventing. How about discovering the structure of DNA, and making open heart surgery happen?

      It's easy to look at a BMW, music software, and the V2 and say the germans are great engineers, and they are good, but we need to look at the US, Japan, China, Finland (and most of Europe), Africa and Britain too LOL. We've all done some good stuff. To say they are the "master engineering " race is laughable. You watch too many bmw commercials. John Goddard invented the modern rocket, and he was an American. The Germans just figured out how to use that to blow people up with. They are innovators.

      Humans are a master engineering race. The Germans excel at cars, and figured out how to blow up people with liquid fuel rockets. whoopdedoo. The chinese were doing it with solid propellant rockets over 1000 years ago, and the Italians and Japanese make the supercars. Let's give credit where it is due.

      L8,
      AC

  9. Scud - link with more detail by CdBee · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  10. The Visionary.... by kc_cyrus · · Score: 5, Informative
    The progress of V2 itself wasn't so important to United States, not until Einstein envisioned a scientific military weapon that carried the potential to end the war.

    In the early 1940's, he wrote a letter to president Franklin D. Roosevelt urging him to start a project to build an atomic bomb because the German government had already started a little atomic bomb project of their own. Einstein believed that a weapon of mass destruction in the hands of the United States would not only end the war, but ensure safety to the rest of the world after the war as well. Roosevelt, being a believer in Einstein, became thrilled at this letter and took the plea into deep consideration. Soon, the project was underway.

    1. Re:The Visionary.... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Yes, it would have ensured the safety of the rest of the world. Unfortunately, the Manhattan Project was full of Communist sympathizers, and they were horrified at the thought of the USA's advantage. So, they gave the weapon to the other side, and the world lived in fear of a nuclear holocaust for the next 50 years.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:The Visionary.... by Yokaze · · Score: 4, Informative
      > Einstein believed that a weapon of mass destruction in the hands of the United States would not only end the war, but ensure safety to the rest of the world after the war as well.

      Your assumption.


      I made one great mistake in my life... when I signed the letter to President Roosevelt recommending that atom bombs be made; but there was some justification - the danger that the Germans would make them. - Albert Einstein


      His only fear was, that the Nazi would build them. He didn't believe in the US being the saviour of the world. In fact, he was suspicous towards any kind of patriotism or nationalism.
      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    3. Re:The Visionary.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Einstein didn't invent the atomic bomb. Leo Szilard did.

    4. Re:The Visionary.... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Do you seriously think that a lack of US moles would have delayed Stalin for more than a few short years? He was obsessed with getting nuclear weapons, and he was going to get them one way or another. He had plenty of smart scientists that would have eventually figured it out.

      If you think that there is any way that the US could have kept a monopoly on the secret of how nuclear weapons work for 50 years, you're smoking some good stuff.

    5. Re:The Visionary.... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Would someone please mod this idiot down?

      The progress of V2 itself wasn't so important to United States, not until Einstein envisioned a scientific military weapon that carried the potential to end the war.

      The V2 and the Atomic Bomb are two completely and totally different subjects. They aren't related in the slightest.

      Einstein envisioned a scientific military weapon that carried the potential to end the war.

      No, Einstein wasn't the one who thought the idea up.

      he wrote a letter to president Franklin D. Roosevelt urging him to start a project to build an atomic bomb

      No, other important scientists of the time collaborated on the letter, such as Openheimer, IIRC. Einstein was just the superstar of the scientific world, so they asked him to sign-off on it.

      Einstein believed that a weapon of mass destruction in the hands of the United States would not only end the war, but ensure safety to the rest of the world after the war as well.

      No, he didn't want ANYONE to have the bomb... However, he was afraid of the terrible consequences if the Nazis got one first, and considered the US having the bomb as the lesser of two evils.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  11. For those not interested... by JonLatane · · Score: 0
    For those interested you can read more at the A4 / V2 Rocket Resource site.

    And for those not interested, you can help /. their site.

  12. They really were after rocket scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of my profs was in the German air force as a radar mechanic. At the end of the war he was driving a truck back from Norway. The Americans were at Penemunde (sp?) and he tried to surrender to them. "Are you a rocket scientist?" they asked. When he said no, they didn't want him. However they were willing to trade his side arm for a tank of gas and he could go down the road and surrender to the British.

    1. Re:They really were after rocket scientists by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is a bit offtopic, but didn't the same thing happen when the Iraqi Information Minister tried to surrender?

    2. Re:They really were after rocket scientists by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Maybe this is a bit offtopic, but didn't the same thing happen when the Iraqi Information Minister tried to surrender?

      Basically, yeah, same thing. Just like there was no point in taking as a POW some lowly mechanic, likewise the US army didn't really have any reason to arrest a talking head. That late in both wars, the fighting was over and neither of those guys were "fighters" anyway.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:They really were after rocket scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's brilliant, believe what a Nazi had to say about the Americans after the war was over. Yup, it had to be true alright. No, he definitely didn't have any pent up agression towards the Americans, no sir.

    4. Re:They really were after rocket scientists by Guppy06 · · Score: 1
      "At the end of the war he was driving a truck back from Norway."

      Which would mean his first chance to surrender would have been when he crossed the Finnish border into the Soviet Union. There was no bridge between Sweden and Denmark at the time (and if there were, it would have been bombed to hell). Which is moot, since...

      "The Americans were at Penemunde (sp?) and he tried to surrender to them."

      ... Peenemünde is on an island. If nothing else, the US would have been very interested in his uber-amphibious truck.

    5. Re:They really were after rocket scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand why being on a island and driving back from Norway makes the story fake. I have been driving around islands before, there are exeptionally good lorry services connecting these islands. Maybe during war it wasn't so regular but I believe that there was similar service going on all the time.

    6. Re:They really were after rocket scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have a look at a map before spouting off, ok?

    7. Re:They really were after rocket scientists by lommer · · Score: 1

      In the absence of an uber-amphibious truck or bridge, he may have opted to use a FERRY instead of driving thousands of kilometers the long way around the baltic sea through hostile territory...

    8. Re:They really were after rocket scientists by wertarbyte · · Score: 0

      Quite right, the place is called "Penemünde", it's the Umlaut that gives it the special german taste :-)

      --
      Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    9. Re:They really were after rocket scientists by wertarbyte · · Score: 0

      Yes, Peeenemünde is on Usedom. I just found this entry in the german wikipedia: Seems like one of the last remaining buildings, the "Sauerstoffwerk" (oxygen factory) is being sold in an auction. Air was liquified there to retrieve Oxygen for use in the rocket programs. Unfortunatly, all of the machines are long gone, so starting your own run for the X-prize is not an option...

      --
      Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    10. Re:They really were after rocket scientists by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      If nothing else, the US would have been very interested in his uber-amphibious truck.

      Here you go

  13. North Koreans already have ballistic missiles by jolyonr · · Score: 3, Informative

    While the A4/V2 information may be of limited use to countries that don't already have a ballistic program, North Korea already has an advanced ballistic missile program, and builds missles based on Russian SCUD technology, itself loosely evolved from the original A4/V2 designs.

    Further information on North Korean missile programs here

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
  14. Wernher von Braun by frank249 · · Score: 5, Funny

    There was a movie biography of Wernher von Braun life produced in the 50's called I Aim for the Stars. I read somewhere that someone wrote on the bottom of a movie poster outside a theatre: I Aim for the Stars ... but sometimes I hit London.

    --

    Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

    1. Re:Wernher von Braun by frank249 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Some people think that Von Braun actually said 'But sometimes I hit London, but it is an old joke popularized by Mort Sahl.

      Von Braun did say
      'Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down?
      That's not my department'.


      It was even put into a 1965 song by Tom Lehrer:

      Gather 'round while I sing you of Wernher von Braun,
      A man whose allegiance
      Is ruled by expedience.
      Call him a Nazi, he won't even frown,
      'Ha, Nazi, Schmazi,' says Wernher von Braun.

      Don't say that he's hypocritical,
      Say rather that he's apolitical.
      'Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down?
      That's not my department,' says Wernher von Braun.

      Some have harsh words for this man of renown,
      But some think our attitude
      Should be one of gratitude,
      Like the widows and cripples in old London town,
      Who owe their large pensions to Wernher von Braun.

      You too may be a big hero,
      Once you've learned to count backwards to zero.
      "In German oder English I know how to count down,
      Und I'm learning Chinese!" says Wernher von Braun.

      --

      Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

  15. Sub launched V2? by CdBee · · Score: 1

    I guess we should consider ourselves very lucky that the Germans never had the time to develop a submarine-launched V2.. or they'd have been able to conduct accurate short-range attacks on targets in the UK (from offshore positions) and maybe even the USA.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:Sub launched V2? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Interesting
      That probably would have been a good development. It took so much of Germany's limited resources to produce V2s that each one probably set them back more than any destruction it caused. Moreover, given its failure rate, fueling and launching a V2 from a submarine would have been extremely dangerous. It probably would have wiped out a good chunk of their submarine fleet.

      Even if used at short range, the V2 was never "accurate". It had extremely primitive guidance, and was no better than throwing a dart at a map of an entire metropolitan area. There was no way to make it hit an individual high-value target.

    2. Re:Sub launched V2? by CdBee · · Score: 1

      You didn't read the site then. The last revisions of the V2 were accurate to within metres of the target even when launched from hundreds of miles away, thanks to superb aiming calibration machines and slight mods to the missile itself.

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    3. Re:Sub launched V2? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I can't find in the several article where it mentions improved accuracy. However, von Braun's next project, the US Redstone missile, had an accuracy of 300m at a similar range as the V2. Although measured in "meters", this accuracy is just about totally useless for conventional weapons targeting.

      High altitude bombers had similar accuracy, and it usually took countless thousands of bombs per raid to effectively destroy major targets. Each large bomber raid carried more explosive power than the all V2s combined delivered over the entire life of the program.

      Moreover, submarine-based launches would have lacked the frame-of-reference required to accurately aim the missiles even if they had perfect guidance.

    4. Re:Sub launched V2? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Who cares how "accurate" the V@ was? that's like comparing a "model T" to an indy race car, you completely miss the point! Germany was the only country DURING the war to have WORKING ballistic missiles in their arsenal... Much like the US atomic program, it was mearly the fact that it worked at all that caused mearly FEAR of the weapon to be enough to achive their goals. It was the first "long range" weapon ever created...before the V2 you had to use bombers or ships and get within several miles of your targets with some kind of supporting force...the V2 fundamentally changed the rules of war, you could shoot from the saftey of another well-fortified city!...the germans just didn't get the full benifit from it!


      Look at how the US fights wars now... the WW2 bombers had to be nearly with in small-arms fire to have a reliable bombing run... now we fire cruise missles from 1000Mi away without "endangering" our own troops. We'd have never "invaded" iraq or afganastan without the V2's decendants.


      The Germans were WAY ahead of their time in weapons development...had they [and japan] not picked the wrong fights [russia/ pearl harbor] the US/ russia would never have entered the war...and Germany would have easily finisihed the job.

    5. Re:Sub launched V2? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Much like the US atomic program, it was mearly the fact that it worked at all that caused mearly FEAR of the weapon to be enough to achive their goals.

      Except that it didn't work. I've never seen anybody suggest that Great Britain considered surrendering due to fear of the V2.

      The Germans were WAY ahead of their time in weapons development

      Yes, and they dedicated so many resources into this not-yet-effective weapons system that it hastened their defeat. With the guidance systems of the 40s-60s, missiles weren't really worthwhile without nuclear warheads. Conventional warhead missiles didn't become worthwhile until precision terminal guidance was introduced in the 1970s with cruise missiles.

    6. Re:Sub launched V2? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Yet you cannot say that the V2 program had no affect on military decisions. Part of the reason why Ike gave Monty the go ahead for Market-Garden was because Churchill was pressuring Ike to do something about the V2 launch sites.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    7. Re:Sub launched V2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Except that it didn't work. I've never seen anybody suggest that Great Britain considered surrendering due to fear of the V2."

      True, although I believe that there was serious discussion about evacuating London in the British govt due to the V weapons, something which had not been considered even in the Blitz.

  16. nazis by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "I aim at the stars, but sometimes I hit London."
    -- Wernher von Braun

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:nazis by pldms · · Score: 1

      I was going to quote that, damn you :-)

      Strictly speaking the first part only can be credited to von Braun. Mort Sahl added the second bit.

      --
      Slashdot looked deep within my soul and assigned
      me a number based on the order in which I joined
    2. Re:nazis by u-238 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correction:

      "I aim at the stars, but sometimes I hit London."
      -- Mort Sahl, who, incidentally, happens to be Jewish.

  17. Does not compute... by tpgp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .....On 4 October 1957, the Soviets launched Sputnik I..... .....America's first attempt to launch a satellite ....was an embarrassing failure.....
    . ....The space race was underway.....
    (much snipping)

    WTF? The Russians get into space and later on the space race is on? Hadn't the russians won (by being first into space?)

    --
    My pics.
    1. Re:Does not compute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose you can see it as a global superpower version of losing a game and saying "best of three?".

    2. Re:Does not compute... by jolyonr · · Score: 1

      First artificial satellite First man in space First (unmanned) landing on the moon First spacewalk Best out of nine maybe? But seriously, Putting a man on the moon dwarfed all of those achievements previously, and the achievement of getting the Apollo 13 crew back safely possibly even more so.

      --


      Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    3. Re:Does not compute... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1
      I know somewhat off-topic...

      But today is my birthday and the anniversary of Kennedy's man on the moon speech.


      Also Kennedy's wedding day, which makes you wonder why he wanted to fly to the moon ...

    4. Re:Does not compute... by rebelcool · · Score: 1

      the space race is more like a marathon. Just because you're off the starting line first doesnt guarantee a 'win'.

      --

      -

    5. Re:Does not compute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russians were the first to put something in orbit, they were the first to send a living being into space and the first to send a man into space. Sorry, but I don't think that going to the moon was the ultimate goal of the space race. You may believe whatever you want (so you can feel good about yourself) but I believe the USSR won the "space race" (i.e. sending a man into space).

    6. Re:Does not compute... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      WTF? The Russians get into space and later on the space race is on? Hadn't the russians won (by being first into space?)

      Your logic there is slipery at very best.

      In any race at all, you don't win by being the first onto the field, you win by being the first one to reach the finish line at the other end of the field... Do you win a track meet by being the first one off the line? No. Do you win a swimming competition by being the first into the water? Of course not.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:Does not compute... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      First artificial satellite First man in space First (unmanned) landing on the moon First spacewalk Best out of nine maybe?

      All nice, but all their successes were only early on... The moon landing was just the first really big achievement where the US beat the USSR.

      The space race did not end when mankind walked on the moon. It continued in satellites, and such.

      The best example would be Mars, since we hear about it so much... Despite the couple of widely publicized failures due to trivial problems, NASA has successfully landed many satellites on Mars, with only a minority being failures. Meanwhile, Russia has tried many times, and NEVER been successful.

      Yeah, after the moon landing, the space-race gets quite one-sided.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  18. Nazi tech by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The technological achievements by the Nazis during the war were amazing. They developed and used:

    • Surface-to-surface missiles
    • Guided air-to-air missiles
    • Jet fighter planes and jet bombers
    • Airplanes transparent to radar
    • Information science (before computers)
    • Encryption technology (only comprimised due to physical reasons, i.e. someone stole one)
    And many others. It's scary to think of what would have happened if they had a few more years to develop before attacking the world.
    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Nazi tech by dave420 · · Score: 1
      And the allies came up with:

      Nuclear weapons
      Computers
      RADAR
      Supersonic 20,000lb bombs
      Jet aircraft (before the Germans)
      Seemingly unbreakable encryption (even today)

      Sure, the Germans came up with lots, but it was only their V2 program that was of any interest to anyone after the war. The main Allied inventions had serious and far-reaching implications for technology after the war, and even today.

    2. Re:Nazi tech by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 4, Informative

      Encryption technology (only comprimised due to physical reasons, i.e. someone stole one)

      Sorry ,but your last statement is utter Bullshit.Either you dont know about encryption or are trolling.The inventor of Enigma assumed that a working Enigma would be available to the enemy and therefore,attempted to build the security around the Algorithm.

      In fact ,when the machine's blueprints reached the french they considered the enigma to be unbreakable and thats why they passed the details to the Polish.A young Mathematician named Marion Rewjyski(sp?) set to work on cracking enigma. For details read the book by Simon Singh.

      It was the poles who first broke the enigma and Bletchley park,which came in later, decoded the intercepts

      The Enigma was the most advanced encryption system at its time in the world but to say it was broken only because a machine was captured is utter fallacy.

      P.S I didnt mean to be rude but most /. ers have read enough articles on Encryption to know that the security of a cipher is in its algorithm and nowhere else.

      --
      Wanted : A Signature.
    3. Re:Nazi tech by someme2 · · Score: 0

      Mostly forgotten: Nazi-Germany leadership did not recognize in any way the advantages of the scientific method. The Nazis again and again failed to measure the results of applying new technology and had no systematic approach to exploiting those technologies.

      Basically it was: If one of the Nazi-Big-Bosses liked it (because it was loud, big or looked dangerous) they would invest in it.
      If somehow no very obvious results were coming out of a programme it was usually abandoned.
      The allies on the other hand employed scientific method and operations research a lot more in evaluating the outcome of their endeavours.

      --
      You can attach boosters to anything. It just costs more. -
      Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 07, @12:26PM
    4. Re:Nazi tech by consciousmind · · Score: 1

      Another less mention Nazi "tech" is their knowledge on propaganda and the manipulation of the public mind. After all, they did manage to spellbind the entire population of Germany. Btw, like most rocketscientists, most of these nazi scientists who were involved in propaganda research, was "relocated" to one of the winning nations.

    5. Re:Nazi tech by TheEqualizer · · Score: 1

      Afther the war Allies analysts noted that the Germans were 15-20 years ahead in the filed of Aeronautics, Rocketry and Submarines. Me-262 was the first jet fighter and in fact the Jet engine was co- invented by Hans von Ohain, a German engeneer, but also don't forget Type XXI Elektroboats, the first modern submarines that were just lightyeras ahead of what the Allies and Japan had http://uboat.net/technical/electroboats.htm , also mass produced. There were also Tanks equipped with experimental night-vision devices http://www.achtungpanzer.com/ir.htm . German Sturmgewehr 44 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MP44 was also the first mass produced Assault Rifle...

    6. Re:Nazi tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're lucky that they weren't farther ahead or able to hold of the allies for longer. Otherwise, the war would have ended with the nuclear bombing of berlin.

    7. Re:Nazi tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The name was Marian Rejewski, but he didn't work alone. He worked in team, with Henryk Zygalski and Jerzy Rozycki. All of them graduated from Adam Mickewicz University in Poznan.

    8. Re:Nazi tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Encryption technology (only comprimised due to physical reasons, i.e. someone stole one)

      Even though the Enigma was an impressive achievement, a _real good_ encryption system should withstand taking apart. It simply had loopholes (as exploited by Turing, among others).

    9. Re:Nazi tech by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Funny, the British had two planes also transparent to radar: the Mosquito and Wellington.

      The Wellington used a wood latticework frame. Significant portions of the Mosquito were made of plywood.

    10. Re:Nazi tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany actually had a computer, the Z3:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z3

    11. Re:Nazi tech by Bender_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And the allies came up with:

      Nuclear weapons
      True

      Computers
      Nope, Konrad Zuse of germany was first. However the Nazis failed to take advantage of it.

      RADAR
      Both sides had radar before the war, the achievement of the british was the magnetron, enable extremely high power and high frequency radar.

      Supersonic 20,000lb bombs
      They were just scaled up conventional bombs. I fail too see the achievement. May also be interesting to note that the allies did not have any targets for 20,000lb bombs on their side.

      Jet aircraft (before the Germans)
      No, not true. Germans were definitly first on this.

      Seemingly unbreakable encryption (even today)

      AFAIK RSA was developed in the 70ies.. ... but it was only their V2 program that was of any interest to anyone after the war

      How about astonishing progress in aviation (Jet planes, Sangers concepts, guidance systems, control systems etc.), U-Boats (all modern submarines follow their concepts now),high speed roads (dont ask me but they developed special processes required to build these),chemical/process engineering (nazi germany virtually lived of coal and air!), chemistry.. etc etc.

    12. Re:Nazi tech by The+Mgt · · Score: 1

      I think you meant 'the Germans', not 'the Nazis'. After all we don't currently refer to Americans as 'the Republicans'.

    13. Re:Nazi tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apparently they weren't that amazing because none of their secret weapons made much of a difference.

    14. Re:Nazi tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Nuclear weapons
      True"

      Yep, and it was the ace in the hand. Whoever had the atomic bomb first won the war, end of story.

      "Computers
      Nope, Konrad Zuse of germany was first. However the Nazis failed to take advantage of it."

      Zuse used his computers in flutter simulations for Heinkel (he was an aero engineer). So arguably the Germans were first to use it.

      However, its strategic importance palls in comparision to the British Colussus, which helped break the German late-war codes and was also the first computer to be built in quantity (c. 12?).

      "RADAR
      Both sides had radar before the war, the achievement of the british was the magnetron, enable extremely high power and high frequency radar."

      It was the cavity magnetron. I also allowed radar sets to be more compact and lighter; it greatly increased the practicality and accuracy of air-borne radar.

      At the start of the war the Germans' radar was actually more accurate than that of the British. However, they regarded it mainly of use in naval rangefinding, while the British (again) made much more visionary use of the technology in setting up the first major radar early warning system.

      "Supersonic 20,000lb bombs
      They were just scaled up conventional bombs. I fail too see the achievement. May also be interesting to note that the allies did not have any targets for 20,000lb bombs on their side."

      Can you say "bunker buster?" British genius Barnes Wallace, after developing the Dambusters bomb, went on to develop the 12000lb Tallboy and then the 22000 (?) Grand Slam. They were "earthquake" bombs, ie they were highly streamlined to go supersonic on their way down, and either penetrate large amounts of concrete/armour etc or create an underground shock wave to bring buildings down that way.

      The Tallboy was used to bust through U-boat pens that were impervious to normal bombs, and also sank the Tirpitz. The Grand Slam came in right at the end.

      "Jet aircraft (before the Germans)
      No, not true. Germans were definitly first on this."

      NO, NO, NO!!!

      The first Gloster Meteors went into service against V1s a week before the first ME262s. The reason people think the Germans were first is that the Meteor wasn't deployed to mainland Europe until 1945. Nevertheless, it had already been flying in home air defence (same role as the 262) for several months by then.

      Note that while the Me262 had the more advanced airframe, the British engines were far more reliable and long-lived.

      "How about astonishing progress in aviation (Jet planes, Sangers concepts, guidance systems, control systems etc.), U-Boats (all modern submarines follow their concepts now),high speed roads (dont ask me but they developed special processes required to build these),chemical/process engineering (nazi germany virtually lived of coal and air!), chemistry.. etc etc."

      And add allied pioneering of proximity fuzes, anti-submarine gear, high-octane aviation fuel, better blood donation/replacement systems and penecillan (sp?), the latter two enabling allied troops to recover from wounds much quicker than German counterparts.

      It was total war. BOTH sides threw every scientific and technical resource at it, and while the German achievements (apart from the A-bomb) were more spectacular, the Allied ones were far more practical.

    15. Re:Nazi tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and don't forget less glamorous but still important Allied advances like:

      high octane avgas
      antibiotics
      better blood transfusion and storage techniques
      better naval anti-fouling paint
      proximity fuzes.

    16. Re:Nazi tech by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      It was the poles who first broke the enigma and Bletchley park,which came in later, decoded the intercepts.
      Sorry ,but your last statement is utter Bullshit.Either you dont know about encryption or are trolling. (To quote your own first line back at you.)

      The Poles broke the basic Enigma, which gave an entry into the later versions with additional rotors and the steckerboard. Those versions were broken by Bletchley Park, and were the direct reason for the invention of Collussus. (The Bombes that were developed by the Poles for some of the lesser systems were not suitable. Not to mention that the daily settings of the Bombes depended on the analytic methodologies developed at Bletchley. Without that analysis, then it would have taken a Bombe days rather than hours to generate a stop.) Bletchley also broke various other high level Enigma based systems.

      P.S I didnt mean to be rude but most /. ers haven't read enough on Enigma and WWII cryptography to understand the full situation. The Poles were ignored for years, yes, but the trend recently is to give them a great deal of credit for things they simply didn't do. Bletchley did far more than simply 'decode the intercepts' and Germany had far more (and more complex) cryptosystems than the basic Enigma the Poles broke.

      The best coverage can be found in this book which was the first (of which I am aware) to detail the role of the Poles, and gives the best and most balanced account.

  19. to put things in perspective... by sgant · · Score: 1

    This is from space.com, written when von Braun died:

    It is now well-known that von Braun was an honorary officer in the S.S., Hitler's feared security police, and that V-2 production was made possible by slave labor at both Peenemuende and Mittelwerk _ facts that were hidden or glossed over by the U.S. government and von Braun himself.

    But scrutiny from journalists and scholars intensified in 1984 after one of von Braun's top men, Arthur Rudolph, left the United States and renounced his citizenship rather than face being tried for war crimes. The Department of Justice determined he was culpable for the condition of slave laborers at Mittelwerk; Rudolph, who died in Germany, said the S.S. was responsible, not him.

    Von Braun's complicity in Nazi atrocities is less clear, Neufeld said. But there is at least one document _ a letter _ in which von Braun discusses a trip to the Buchenwald concentration camp, where he apparently spoke to the commandant about obtaining more skilled laborers to use at Mittelwerk.

    ``The floodgates (of scrutiny) opened with Rudolph,'' said Neufeld, who published a book on the rocket team, ``The Rocket and the Reich.''

    In ensuing years, newspaper and magazine stories as well as several books critical of von Braun were published. The accounts were fueled in part by concentration camp survivors angry that the scientist had become a hero in the United States.

    The remaining members of the German rocket team say it's unfair to criticize them for their role at Peenemuende and Mittelwerk. They say that role must be viewed in the context of the times.

    ``During the war, practically everything was done with concentration camp labor,'' Dahm said.

    Von Braun himself, Jacobi and others point out, was briefly imprisoned by the S.S., supposedly for talking about going to the moon. Germany was losing the war and the government wanted him to concentrate on missile production.

    ``What's the definition of slave laborer?'' said Jacobi. ``In a certain sense we were slave laborers. Under certain dictatorships you have to do certain things.''


    Two sides to ever story. I'm not making judgement calls here on what was in the heart of von Braun and if he was indeed a true war criminal. One thing is for sure, von Braun's main ambition in life...one that set him on his course...was to reach the Moon.

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    1. Re:to put things in perspective... by sgant · · Score: 1

      my mistake btw...this was written remembering Von Braun...not when he died.

      Von Braun died in 1977.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
  20. For more information.... by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you would like to see a very good comparison between the US and the USSR space race, starting all the way back in WWII Germany, you should go to The Kansas Cosmosphere and Space Center in Hutchinson, KS. The Hall of Space exhibit starts with the German slave camps building the V1 and V2 rocket, and goes all the way through to Apollo/Soyuez.

    It is one of the few places on Earth where you can see an intact V1 and V2 rocket.

    1. Re:For more information.... by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

      There's also a V-2 at the National Air & Space Museum in Washington D.C. One thing that struck me about it was how lousy the "fit and finish" was: the body panels were wavy and uneven. Then I realized that it might be hard to get high-quality workmanship from slave labor....

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    2. Re:For more information.... by p3d0 · · Score: 1
      Your journal entry has been archived, so I can't reply there, but...

      I think you might misunderstand the meta-mod system. It's based on fairness, not correctness. The options are not "agree" and "disagree". Just because you wouldn't mod a post the same as someone else doesn't imply that their choice was unfair.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  21. "Once rockets go up, who cares vere they come down by vm146j2 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That's not my department,
    Says Werner von Braun!"

    --
    "Lost time is not found again."
  22. Tom Lehrer said it best... by Stanistani · · Score: 0, Redundant

    From Tom Lehrer's satirical song
    Wernher Von Braun ...
    Don't say that he's hypocritical
    Say rather that he's apolitical
    "Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down
    That's not my department," says Wernher von Braun
    ...

  23. Re:"Once rockets go up, who cares vere they come d by Stanistani · · Score: 0

    *Sigh* You beat me to the Tom Lehrer ref... by seven d@mn minutes...
    Now I will have to go listen to "Poisoning the Pigeons in The Park" to drown my sorrows...

    Where did I leave those "peanuts all coated in cyanide?"
    I do love the Ansari X prize, tho...
    Wish NASA had prizes for -
    Orbit
    Moon pass-by
    Moon landing

  24. Reason why: Sergei P. Korolev. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

    The reason why the Soviets managed to get the first satellite into space is simple: a brilliant Russian rocket designer named Sergei P. Korolev, who passed away in 1966.

    People forget that the Soviet rocket program in a very secret group called RNII was very underestimated by everyone else, because in the 1930's before the Yezhovchina Great Purge the Russians probably had some of the most advanced rocket development programs in the world--in some cases more advanced than the German programs at the time! Despite the Great Purge, Korolev managed to keep the majority of his development team at RNII together, and Korolev was actually working for SMERSH (Soviet counterintelligence) in the latter half of the 1940's studying German developments in rocket technology. That's why by the early 1950's the Soviet rocket program was probably more advanced than the US program, and that's why they were able to build the R-7 rocket designed by Korolev's team (which was far larger than any US equivalent rocket at the time) that carried the large-sized Soviet nuclear bombs with the side benefit of being able to launch payloads into orbit. The sheer size of the R-7 was also the reason why the Russians were able to launch unmanned probes around the Moon and launch the first manned flights. Because the R-7 was designed as an ICBM, it meant the ability to launch in a fairly short countdown sequence and used launch pads that could erect the rocket into firing position fairly quickly, too; that's why the Russians were able to launch reconnaissance satellites so quickly and had a pretty advanced space weapons program.

    1. Re:Reason why: Sergei P. Korolev. by multiplexo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Although Korolev was brilliant the Russian program wasn't all that much more advanced than the US program. In fact the US could have put a satellite into orbit in 1956 had they wanted to. However President Eisenhower wanted the first satellite to be launched by a civilian agency. On April 23rd 1956 the Army informed the office of the Secretary of Defense that a Jupiter missile could be fired in an effort to orbit a small satellite in January of 1957. The Army then backed up this claim by launching a Jupiter missile on September 20th 1956 that flew 3,335 miles downrange, acheived an altitude of 682 miles and a velocity of Mach 18, which would have been sufficient to place a small satellite in orbit. You can check this out at the Army in Space page at the Redstone Arsenal website.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  25. Nazis and discussion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't this posting, by its very nature, immediately violate Godwin's law?

  26. Sputnik /= Basketball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sputnik was a sphere 68cm in diameter. Beachball, maybe. Basketball? Uh. Uh.

    1. Re:Sputnik /= Basketball by TheEqualizer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sputnik made no scientific discoveries, it was pretty much just a simple relay, a propaganda machine. On the other hand, Explorer 1 was packed with scientific equipment and among others discovered the van Allen belts! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explorer_1

    2. Re:Sputnik /= Basketball by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Sputnik showed that something that was theoretically possible was also possible in practice. In other words, it was an experiment. Doesn't that qualify as science?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    3. Re:Sputnik /= Basketball by Catmeat · · Score: 1
      Sputnik made no scientific discoveries, it was pretty much just a simple relay, a propaganda machine.

      This is untrue. Sputnik was mainly a propaganda machine - it let the world know the Soviets had a rocket that could carry a 100kg satellite into orbit and therefore a 1000kg warhead to Washington. However the tracking of its orbit and decay did privide a lot of data on atmospheric density at orbital altitudes - something almost unknown at the time. This was intentional and the reason Sputnik was spherical.

      Note that even the Soviets didn't initially know how much of a propaganda effect Sputnik would have. On the day after launch, Pravda had only a small article mentioning it. It was only the next day - after they had seen the world wide reaction - that Pravda had banner headlines.

  27. Canadian content by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't forget the Avro Arrow, which the Canadian entry is named after, was a jet fighter that was very advanced for its time. The program was cancelled by the Canadian government due to pressure from the US government.

    Most of the engineers who worked at Avro went to work for the US space program. Yet again picking the best scientists from the spoils of, this time, a political war.

    It boggles the mind all those connections.

    If you're in Canada visiting mention "Avro Arrow" and see what reaction you get even now all these years later.

    Arrow info

    1. Re:Canadian content by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...and also.

      EXN.ca an article on the Canadian Discovery Channel about the relationship between Avro Arrow and NASA.

      "When they were flying the Arrow," explains Gainor, "they decided that only one person should talk to the pilot, and that person should have experience as a pilot. At NASA, to this day, all the conversations with the crew are done through the capcom, which is always another astronaut."

    2. Re:Canadian content by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      If you're in Canada visiting mention "Avro Arrow" and see what reaction you get even now all these years later.
      I've done so. And what I get is ignorant jingoistic nonsense. You'll never hear for example of the sad state of disarray the development of the Arrow's fire control system was in. Nor will you hear how the US later cancelled the missile that the Arrow was supposed to carry because of their lackluster performance. Nor will you hear how it took the Americans a decade to perfect their equivalent fire control system and longer still to perfect the missile. (The task turned out be far harder than expected.)

      The stature of the Arrow has grown to a mythic state over the last forty years, and like any myth it now has only a loose connection to the facts. (Read here for more information.) It's hard to credit that the Arrow would have lived up to it's press releases when no other aircraft in the West (incl the UK and France) of the era did so, and the few that even approached the level of performance promised took over a decade of difficult and expensive work to do so.

  28. They were working on it. by plopez · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://prinzeugen.com/V2.htm

    another project the US picked up and pursued.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  29. Working for Uncle Joe by TheEqualizer · · Score: 1

    Morally speaking, why doesn't Korolev get the same political backslash von Braun does, Stalin killed 30 million of his own people, and the Gulags were no different from Nazi concentration camps. Both Nazis and Communists had one thing in common, both ideologies required that enemies of the system be removed, to Nazis they were "the enemies of Aryan purity" the Jews, Gypises, gays and lefties, to Communists they were the "enemies of the working class" the middle class, the industrialists, intellectuals, including many Russian minorities.

    1. Re:Working for Uncle Joe by SergeyKurdakov · · Score: 2, Informative

      why doesn't Korolev get the same political backslash von Braun does

      maybe because Korolev himself spent years in Gulag.

    2. Re:Working for Uncle Joe by TheEqualizer · · Score: 1

      "maybe because Korolev himself spent years in Gulag." Well, von Braun was arrested by the SS for "crimes against the state", as Himmler didn't appreciate all the talk of space rockets, he was only saved because of Dornberger's slyness in getting him out.

  30. Gravity's Rainbow by jefu · · Score: 1
    Thomas Pynchon's novel "Gravity's Rainbow" deserves a mention here as it is kind of all about the V2. Sort of.

    I think fair use will stretch enough to allow me to quote one of his "Rocket Limericks" :

    There once was a thing called a V2
    To pilot which you did not need to
    You just pushed a button
    And it would leave nothing But stiffs and big holes and debris too

    1. Re:Gravity's Rainbow by SergeyKurdakov · · Score: 2, Informative
      There was another novel 'Space' by James A. Michener which had a good coverage of the history of that time

      BTW, during my days in university I studied in the same building that German scientists worked in after the ww2 on designing soviet jets and rockets in Himki near Moscow . These were the buildings of Lavochkin Association company ( the one which built famous La-5 during ww2 then the company developed first russian jets and later produced russian space vehicles which flew to Moon Mars and Venus).

  31. The Avro Incident by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the Avro Arrow, which the Canadian entry is named after, was a jet fighter that was very advanced for its time. The program was cancelled by the Canadian government due to pressure from the US government.

    Most of the engineers who worked at Avro went to work for the US space program. Yet again picking the best scientists from the spoils of, this time, a political war.

    It boggles the mind all those connections.

    If you're in Canada visiting mention "Avro Arrow" and see what reaction you get even now all these years later.


    Even after all these years, there are still hundreds of thousands of angry middle-aged Canadian men hunched over their basement workbenches assembling small plastic models of the Avro--all the while cursing under their breath the 900lb gorilla who cost them their Arrow.

    My fellow Americans, when the Canadians come flooding across the border with guns in their hands and murder in their eyes, don't go crying to your leaders about the world's longest uncontrolled border.

    1. Re:The Avro Incident by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      My fellow Americans, when the Canadians come flooding across the border with guns in their hands and murder in their eyes, don't go crying to your leaders about the world's longest uncontrolled border.

      You say that as if Canada were a sovereign nation and not part of the United States.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  32. It was more of a different mindset... by weedenbc · · Score: 2, Informative
    The Nazis were more concerned about developing technology that could directly lead to weapons, resulting in chemical weapons, jet aircraft, new artillery, ballistic rockets, etc. The Allies on the other hand were do more "big picture" scientific research into new areas such as nuclear reactions, radar, and computers. These all had military uses and applications, but also formed the basis for our dominance and technological revolution in the decades following WWII.

    And it's definately not an American thing - most of the scientists responsible for these incredible achievments were not Americans (Bohr, Einstein, von Braun, Fermi, etc) and a large portion of the work was accomplished in England.

    --

    "Trying is only the first step towards failure." - Homer
  33. Insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I can't comment on the article, as I have not read it yet, but reading the article on /. it is somehow revealing that slave labor is not mentioned. Reading a lot of the things about the V2 one gets the impression that people like to forget this part of history.
    As for slave labor being irrelevant, I think the thousands who died, and the thousands who survived it but had to live with the consequences for the rest of their lives would tend to disagree.

    Finally, my dear mods, the V2 was produced with slave labor and if someone mentions this fact he is not a troll (your modding is disgusting), just as someone who claims that slave labor is irrelevant doesn't have to be considered insightful.

    1. Re:Insightful? by donscarletti · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yeah, that's true and all, but what has that got to do with the technology behind the V2? (which if you had read the article you would know that it is based on)

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    2. Re:Insightful? by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      P.S. Slave labour is mentioned in the last three paragraphs of page 2. The original post WAS a troll because the article does go into a little bit of deatail of Von Brahn's personal involvment in this.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  34. Astronaut Gordon Cooper wrote about this ... by ankhank · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In "Leap of Faith" (Harper, ISBN 0-006-109877-9

    p. 172 "As we always said at the time, our Germans are better than their Germans.
    "The visitors to Wehrner's house included ... Joaquin "Jack" Keutner, with whom I worked in the early days of Mercury on the Redstone rocket program. Jack had some hair-raising flying stories to tell. In an attempt to improve the accuracy over the target, some V-1s were modified with a cockpit to allow for a pilot [air-dropped from a] twin-engine Junkers bomber. After being dropped free, he would air-start the "Flying Bomb." When they got within range of London he would release the bomb, then turn toward the French coast and ride the rocket home."

    p. 173: "At war's end, a manned V-2 was sitting on the pad at Peenemunde, all tested out, fueled up, and ready to go. It would have been launched on a low-energy easterly orbit, Jack explained. The plan: to drop a warhead on New York City. That 1945 manned rocket flight -- sixteen years before the first U.S. manned rocket flight -- came within a week or so of being launched."
    "Wehrner confided to me that the Germans were testing more than rockets at Peenemunde. "Some of the craft we were developing," he said, "were far ahead of anything the rest of the world had or knew about."

    p. 170: After a V-2 first hit London, Wehrner remarked to his colleagues, "the rocket worked perfectly, except for landing on the wrong planet."

    1. Re:Astronaut Gordon Cooper wrote about this ... by TheEqualizer · · Score: 1

      Though a hero of the space race, Gordon Cooper is a new age crackpot nowadays. I'd not trust his comments that much. New Agers love to turn the Peenemunde into some kind of a Nazi Area-51.

  35. First V2 sightings by WowTIP · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the first broken V2s ever captured by, or, in effect given to the allies landed in southern Sweden in July 21st 1944. It was the result of a failed test flight, and it scared the living hell out of some relatives of mine.

    Read more at Linus Walleij's site covering the topic. Interesting reading.

    --

    --

    "I'm surfin the dead zone
    In the twilight, unknown"
  36. an interesting comment by Trepidity · · Score: 2, Funny

    Considering that the armchair psychologist and the university-trained psychoanalyst dispense equal measures of bullshit.

  37. The V2 killed twice more POW than English people by franois-do · · Score: 1
    I would just say that nazi germany was under attack and as any country under attack attempted to retaliate. Even if it had not been a nazi country at that time, it would have acted the same. Any country would have acted the same. And in fact the atomic bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed more civilians than V2s ever did, all off them being anyway much less destructive than todays' biggest bombs, though there is no nazi rationale behing their construction this time.

    That being said, a little-known fact is that the V2 project killed twice more prisoners of war in Germany for their construction than English people. This was because of unfair treatment of POW by nazi Germany, and a more rational reason to blame nazi Germany than the mere fact of organizing its ripost to bombings.

    --
    Signature omitted in order to save space. Thanks for your understanding.
  38. I was wondering how that worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was told the story it was made clear that the challenge was to avoid being captured by the Russians. I'm pretty sure he didn't go behind Russian lines. Of course, the class I was taking was 'Control Systems' not history.

  39. Wasn't the first V series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bad enough?

  40. ... and smart bombs by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

    Although never deployed they did experiment with wire guided smart bombs which did work. I saw this BBC doco years back called "The Secret War" or something similar, about secret weapons etc in WW2. Among the amazing stuff was film of a smart bomb test using a dummy bomb on a target building, direct bulls-eye. Also they had a clip showing that in the Battle of the Bulge the Reich was trying to deploy one of its experimental jet bombers, holy sh*t eh, just as well the weather was no good.

    Had some very clever scientists and engineers, those that hadn't been thrown in concentration camps that is. Nothing to do with the Nazis as such since they were really anti high technology ... more like neo-barbarians. But I digress.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
    1. Re:... and smart bombs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nazis were nut cases.

      They were like a New Age group of the Dark Side. They spent millions on ideas like a hollow earth.

  41. Slave labor by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    The issue of slave labor is highly important because not only was the V2 a pioneering rocket that went into space in a suborbit on a war mission, the V2 was mass produced, and the fact that it was mass produced meant there were so many "war surplus" V2s to help jump start the U.S. space program. I have seen web pages talking about how space access is so expensive in comparison to how V2s were made cheaply and in large numbers, but people are forgetting that a tremendous amount of labor went into V2 production at a great human cost. Also, I think the word "slave labor" doesn't create the right impression of what took place. It creates an image of Germans in officer uniforms sipping mint juleps while camp inmates toiled over work benches and hummed tunes. The cruelty of the German slave labor system was the food rations and the deliberate undernourishment of the laborers. The rations were almost scientifically calculated to get the maximum amount of work out of a person before they turned into the human skeletons you see in the camp photos and soon died. If they gave the laborers no food at all they would have died much more quickly. While it was a terrible crime to take trainloads of people and kill them right away with poison gas, it was an even greater crime to kill people as slowly as one can imagine by just giving them barely enough food to work on munitions while giving people a false hope that while they were doing this work they were being spared the fate of the others killed by poison. I don't know if the "human subject experiments" of the Nazis contributed anything to medical knowledge, but it would be a great burden to know that some medical advance that everyone benefits from came from that venue. I think people should be aware of the human cost of the V2 program. As to the argument that the article talks about technology not production, technology and production are intertwined, and the large scale production of V2s made them available at war's end to the American program (don't think the Russians were able to get their hands on the actual V2s, but they did get their hands on some of the mid-level Germans involved in the program -- the high-level Germans worked mightily on ending up in American hands, Operation Paperclip and all of that. Also, if the Germans were unable to produce the V2 in large numbers, their would have been no interest in having developed the technology in the first place, and the slave labor was perhaps and enabler as to why the V2 was allowed to be developed in the first place.