Slashdot Mirror


Yellow Dog Linux v4.0 Released

worm eater writes "On September 29, Terra Soft Solutions delivered the final release of Yellow Dog Linux v4.0 to their CD manufacturer. It is currently available for download by ydl.net subscribers. Yellow Dog Linux v4.0 is built upon Fedora Core 2, offering both KDE 3.3 and GNOME 2.6.0 desktops with an all new presentation for both the Installer and post-installed desktop environment. Expanded USB support includes many cameras, printers, adapters, and storage devices. FireWire support is now built-in with bootable FireWire made possible through manual configuration. Mac-On-Linux offers the ability to run Mac OS 9 and Mac OS X and now offers automatic network configuration."

182 comments

  1. Hmmm by bgackle · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmmm... Yellow dog linux, the distro for computers named after a red fruit.

    --
    What we really need is a ten day waiting period and a background check before you can buy a congressman.
    1. Re:Hmmm by arose · · Score: 1

      Never seen yellow apples? Or green?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    2. Re:Hmmm by AoT · · Score: 1

      thats lemon or lime to you

    3. Re:Hmmm by GnuAge · · Score: 1

      I think you may be missing the point. This is a distro for all them southern Yellow Dog Democrats what that would sooner vote for a yellow dog than a Repugnican.

      Personally, I have enough trouble telling the difference between Demublicans & Republocrats, so my distro of choice is the more ideologically correct Red Flag Linux from the People's Republic of China. Rather than bark I prefer to Mao...

  2. Corelation by leonmergen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmmm, for some reason I have the feeling there is some sort of corelation between the naming of "Red Hat" and "Yellow Dog" ...

    --
    - Leon Mergen
    http://www.solatis.com
    1. Re:Corelation by inkswamp · · Score: 2, Funny
      Which reminds me... do Red Hat and Yellow Dog support Blue Tooth?

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    2. Re:Corelation by Fuzzle · · Score: 1

      Well, YDL is based of off Red Hat. So, could be.

    3. Re:Corelation by Fuzzle · · Score: 0, Troll

      Damn you and your grammar, logic, and whatnot.

    4. Re:Corelation by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      I thought it was something to do with the Martin Amis novel.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    5. Re:Corelation by HeX314 · · Score: 0

      I would say you're right considering that Red Hat produces both distributions.

    6. Re:Corelation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha! This question about Blue Tooth support in Yellow Dog is nothing but a Red Herring!

      (yeah, I suck...)

    7. Re:Corelation by senatorpjt · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, the only reason I haven't installed YDL is because it doesn't support Airport Extreme. Any news on this?

    8. Re:Corelation by colinleroy · · Score: 4, Informative

      No linux kernel supports Airport Extreme. Blame Apple for their choice of a proprietary Broadcom chipset. (you can also blame Broadcom if you prefer to do so)

      --
      blah
    9. Re:Corelation by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      If YDL can run Mac OS X, can't Airport be supported through that ?
      (completely hypothetically, my experience of the current Apple stuff being limited to poking at an ibook for a couple minutes in a store)

      Alternatively, since there are loaders for binary windows drivers for Intel Linux, maybe such a hack could be pulled together on PPC systems for MacOS drivers.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    10. Re:Corelation by bursch-X · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't a look at the drivers for Airport Extreme in Darwin help there? I know, that drivers in darwin are done quite differently than you'd write them for Linux, but shouldn't it be enough to understand how to basically write drivers for the AirportExtreme card?

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
    11. Re:Corelation by gemello · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but there are no drivers for Airport nor Airport Extreme in Darwin. See the OpenDarwin Sources for the available open source.

    12. Re:Corelation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the novel that came out in 2003... even though YDL has been around much, much longer...

    13. Re:Corelation by Fuzzle · · Score: 1

      The troll rating for this is hilarious. Sarcasm 101.

    14. Re:Corelation by AvantLegion · · Score: 1

      Instead of "blaming", I'd like to hear progress. I've heard of people trying to write a driver for it. I want to hear more.

    15. Re:Corelation by bursch-X · · Score: 1

      Well, that's indeed pretty disappointing (I'm not a programmer, so I was just guessing), though it might not necessarily be Apple's fault, it could have to do with copyright to certain parts of the drivers that doesn't belong to Apple. :-(

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
    16. Re:Corelation by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      (you can also blame Broadcom if you prefer to do so)

      Well, of course I prefer to do so! Apple is, like, beleaguered and stuff...

  3. missing features.. by AngstAndGuitar · · Score: 0, Troll

    It doesn't seem to make breakfast...
    nor walk the dog, nor feed the cat.
    I suppose we'll have to wait for the next version.
    :(

    --
    Less look fast, more go fast.
  4. NEW!? by AngstAndGuitar · · Score: 0, Troll

    My mac-user friend was using Yellow Dog >4 years ago....
    That's not exactly "new".

    --
    Less look fast, more go fast.
  5. Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by nijk · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Although it's nice to have the low-cost choice...it's never too much trouble to configure OS X to run almost any Linux program out there.

    1. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by melonman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have to say I'm also struggling to work out what niche Linux for OS X machines fills. If you want Linux, there's cheaper hardware to run it on, and I'd expect more of the exotic stuff to work properly. If you want a Mac experience, Linux probably isn't going to deliver. If you want un*x plus cuddly Mac interface, I thought that was the whole point of OS X....

      --
      Virtually serving coffee
    2. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      LinuxPPC is a great option for older Macs with pre-OSX or pre-Panther. With one of many WM themes, you can approximate the latest Mac experience without shelling out $150.

    3. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but can it run Linux? Wait. BRB!....

      In Yellowdog, the kernels compile you!

      YAH! JENGA!

    4. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the other hand, have you seen the laptop market recently? Trying to find a light, well made laptop with a DVD writer and a decent screen is next to impossible - you can get badly made crap from Dell (where the drivers all work) or a Thinkpad from IBM (with a ATI card! aargh! no working 3d!).

      In that environment a powerbook running Linux seems like a pretty good idea to me, at least for those that are perfectly happy with Linux and dont want to change tyvm.

      --
      Beep beep.
    5. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by jeif1k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Linux fulfills the same niche on PPC it does on Windows: people are stuck with some hardware and they don't like the operating system on it. Maybe they bought an OS X machine believing that they would get a "UNIX workstation with a nicer GUI" and discovered that it didn't fit their needs after all. Maybe they discovered that their laptop is slower than they'd like it to be with OS X. Maybe they want different software that's better supported under Linux.

      Also, in some niches, it can be worth buying Apple hardware for specific design features. For example, even though PC panel computers have been around for many years, the new iMac is particularly cheap and widely available because it is targeted at the mass market. And Apple's iBooks are a decent compromise as entry-level laptops. And many Apple designs just look nice, and installing YDL is a lot easier than replacing the motherboard.

      So, until Apple starts shipping PPC hardware without an OS or with Linux preinstalled, Linux on Apple hardware won't become a mainstream choice. But there are situations where it makes sense.

    6. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Well, I stand corrected.

      Go Yellow Dog! Cliffhat The Big Red Distro.

    7. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by metlin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That is not entirely true.

      I, for one, do not quite like the inerface of MacOS or OSX. But when I get the opportunity to buy cheap hardware, I would not like to let it pass.

      Often, cheap Macs come off for sale on the university's mailing lists. In such cases, I find it easier to just buy these and install Linux on them. It's also easier for me simply because it's an interface I'm quite familiar and comfortable with.

      I'm sure there are quite a few users like me out there. Not to beat the looks I get when I show Mac fanatics ppcs running Linux - and besides, a Mac looks cool ;-)

    8. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But some people used find the MacOS GUI awful.

    9. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a powerbook running linux will not have a working 3d thanks to nvidia.

    10. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      Why? Clearly they're looking ahead.

      As Bill "I didn't ever say 640K oughta be enough for anyone, what you see on your BIOS setup is purely your imagination" Gates recently said, in several years time there will only be two OSes - Windows and Linux.

      So, all us Mac users^B^B^B^B^B fanboys will then need another OS to run our beautiful style-over-substance-hardware with, once Mac OS X suddenly disappears from existence.

    11. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have to say I'm also struggling to work out what niche Linux for OS X machines fills. If you want Linux, there's cheaper hardware to run it on, and I'd expect more of the exotic stuff to work properly

      Personally, I find the early iMacs and B&W G3s pretty lacklustre on OSX. Running a PPC distro like Debian gives them the speed they used to have in OS9, with an operating system that hasn't been abandoned.

      For anything quicker I'm with you, though.

    12. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by melonman · · Score: 1

      I can't decide how ironic that post is intended to be, but what I'm getting from all the responses is that Linux for PPC is an aid to recycling old Macs, or maybe getting a cheap and small laptop, and that it has no pretensions of filling any mainstream niche. And why not (hey, I'm still using an Acorn for my DTP!), but I do wonder what this means for drivers, libraries and so on. Does, say, Xine work?

      --
      Virtually serving coffee
    13. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Toojays · · Score: 1

      The cheaper hardware is not necessarily as good, and OS X is not Free Software. I use Gentoo on an iBook.

    14. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by baryon351 · · Score: 1, Funny

      a powerbook running linux will not have a working 3d thanks to nvidia.

      Yeah, damn straight, I'm so sick of the lack of nvidia support for my powerbook's radeon

    15. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Yeah, damn straight, I'm so sick of the lack of nvidia support
      > for my powerbook's radeon

      u'll find that powerbooks use nvidia geforce, its only the Mac desktops that use radeons.

      nice try. what's it they say about mac users not knowing their hardware?

    16. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has to be an old old powerbook to be using a radeon. we're presumably talking about new hardware here.

    17. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 0, Troll

      Linux is useless on a powerbook, there are no drivers for Airport Extreme.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    18. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by nathanh · · Score: 1
      I have to say I'm also struggling to work out what niche Linux for OS X machines fills. If you want Linux, there's cheaper hardware to run it on,

      Not all of us are driven to buy the cheapest option available. Some of us buy the snappier suits, the fancier cars, the better quality furniture, and the more stylish laptops.

      Apple produces the most stylish laptop in the market. The benefit of running Linux is that I'm not confined to x86; I was able to jump to Apple hardware without changing my software.

    19. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Seehund · · Score: 3, Interesting
      YDL 4.0 introduces official support for the Pegasos II motherboards. Unfortunately you can't run MacOS X (natively) on a Pegasos. That's one reason I haven't seen mentioned yet.

      Other than that I generally agree with this comment.

      Another thing speaking in advantage for Linux on Macs is that MacOS X just won't run with usable performance on older Macs, and MacOS pre-X is an abomination and not an option, IMO. Granted, YDL/Fedora Core are pretty hefty GNOME/KDE based distros, but they still get away with less hardware grunt than MacOS X, and as for Linux in general there are leaner PPC distros (here is a rather new example).


      BTW...

      Seehund's Recent Submissions
      Title Datestamp
      Yellow Dog Linux 4.0 (for real!) 2004.09.30 21:27 Rejected

      Bother! :)
      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
    20. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the powerbook is a graphical terminal with no ethernet card? Completely useless without being able to contact a server over wireless.

      Meanwhile, I'll keep on looking for a laptop that actually works, without forcing me to use some wireless crap that's only usefull for 1337 h4X0rs and pedophiles.

    21. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by chrome · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My Powerbook 54 17" came with an NVidia. I didn't want it, but thats what it came with.

      3D isn't so much of an issue for me; I spend my life in rxvts, but what IS an issue for me is dual display support. Without that, its pretty well useless.

      I can do without the airport extreme support (Come on, dragging a cable over 5 metres is not such a big deal) but the lack of a xinerama/dual head capable nv driver is problematic for me.

      The irony of this whole story is that today I wiped Debian Linux off my powerbook and rebuild my machine to use all 60GB of disk space for OSX for exactly these reasons.

      I wonder if YDL have solved the outstanding issues with the nv driver and extreme?

    22. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by geniusj · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're quite simply.. wrong.. The powerbooks either come with an nvidia geforce fx or a radeon mobility. I personally have a mobility 9600.

    23. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > u'll find that powerbooks use nvidia geforce, its only the Mac desktops that use radeons.
      > what's it they say about mac users not knowing their hardware?


      what's it they say about anonymous cowards not checking their facts.

      I am not an AC... I'm a free man!

    24. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, the current high-end PowerBooks use Radeons.

    25. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Fine, get an inexpensive 802.11g card and stick it in the pcmcia slot, or get a usb 802.11g reader that's supported. I wouldn't say it's useless just because some hardware is not supported.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    26. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by msobkow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The $150 isn't what stops me from trying something like Yellow Dog. It's the lack of vendor software builds such as Oracle, Sybase, etc.

      As a developer, I can get free/cheap developer kits on x86 Linux or Windows from any major vendor. But when it comes to POWER, SPARC, or other OS's you need to buy everything, if it's available at all.

      That really is a shame -- especially the limited AMD64 support in some cases.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    27. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by deathontwolegs · · Score: 1

      There are on problems with software, because Debian and Gentoo both have very good ppc support (and think that no other distro has so much avaiable packages as these two), and yes xine, mplayer, firefox , and so on, all works..
      About drivers you've got the same problem as in linux x86 there's no support for the latest hardware (wireless, and so on), nvidia doesn't make linux drivers (i think it's apple fault because nvidia says that the ppc platform is apple responsability, maybe they have some kind of agreement), ati also don't make drivers, but the dri project has 3d drivers for every chip until 9200 (this means the lastest ibooks still have 3d)..
      About libraries, i never had any kind of trouble (maybe you have special needs, but i don't think there will be any kind of problem).

    28. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by yerfatma · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      1337 h4X0rs and pedophiles

      Remember that Apple was founded by one of each.

    29. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by DenDave · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually I am awaiting a G-5 Ibook to run YD.. What I have seen from YD I am impressed. I am a long time RedHatter so I feel at home with YD. I really like the contribution they have made to the hell of packagemanegement with YUM, it is, IMHO, the only reason why RH9.0 users have been able to migrate their systems to Fedora without a major problem (that of RHN being unavailable). Don't get me wrong, I like OSX and the Aqua gimmicks are cute but I am an old dog and I chew my bone on KDE...

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    30. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      Well i had two reasons and a half to switch.

      1) after less than six month of my purchase of a top of the line titanium II OSX 10.2 came out and there was no discount for me.

      2) I have an older mac and a pc. I installed debian and i have a unified enviroment to work with.

      2.5) more packages in Debian than in Fink.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    31. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thinkpad from IBM (with a ATI card! aargh! no working 3d!).

      ATI has a Linux driver, and although the performance is far from its Windows version, it's functional. X.Org's ATI module (6.8.x) also provides DRI support.

    32. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by krunk7 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      IBM has several models of Linux certified laptops and if you've ever used an IBM laptop you know their of the highest quality.
      There are other options too for pre-installed laptops with full customer application support: Element Computers

      They are a linux only vendor and were favorably reviewed. They've been featured on slasdot a couple of times.

      What you want is out there, your just not going to get it from the Dell+Gateway+HP+Apple world.......and why should you? They're not linux vendors. Remember a purchase from them increases demand for a Windows/Apple operating system, a purchase from a linux retailer increases support for Linux OS....no matter what you choose to install afterwards. :)

    33. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by GreenKiwi · · Score: 1

      Ouch! Those cost a bundle. $775usd for the board with 1ghz proc and $1500 for:
      * Nexus Vivid Blue case w/ 330W psu (Screwless design for easy future modifications)
      * Pegasos II Mainboard and Motorola G4 Processor @ 1Ghz
      * ATI Radeon 9200 SE 128MB Graphics card
      * 40GB Hard Disk Drive
      * 256MB (DDR256) PC2100 RAM
      * Standard Keyboard and Mouse
      * Standard CDRW drive
      Software:
      * MorphOS 1.4 pre-installed
      * Debian pre-installed
      * Mac on Linux packages installed
      * Super bundle installed

      Ok, now Apple's offerings:
      1.25GHz G4 eMac - $800
      1.6GHz G5 iMac - $1300
      Dual Proc 1.8GHz G5 PowerMac - $2000

      Well, value for money, I know what I'd pick.

    34. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

      12'' PBs have no PCMCIA slots. Also, yes, it is useless. People in the real world use wireless if they have it. The point being, no cables. If you are forced to be at a table where there is a network connection, the point of a modern laptop is lost.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    35. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This thread is lame, so I'll post too. Basically I bought an Apple because PPC is a cool RISC platform. Mmm, dorky goodness. I have about $500 in an iBook with a lot of RAM, and I can run OS 9, OS X, Debian, OpenBSD, Yellowdog, Gentoo, NetBSD... All on a non-X86 RISC machine. Up yours Wintel.

    36. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by swillden · · Score: 1

      Thinkpad from IBM (with a ATI card! aargh! no working 3d!).

      My Thinkpad T40 has a Radeon M9000 and I have working 3D.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    37. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by NtroP · · Score: 1
      Well, I haven't tried it yet, but I'm about to. My biggest hope for this is to be able to run "thin-clients" off a central server. If I could get our Linux-booting thin-clients to connect to an Xserve running Yellow Dog, then our our old pc's and macs would be able to run some of our Mac-Only software. We have many labs out there right now that are too old and slow to be much use. We can't upgrade them to Panther (from OS 8 and 9) without adding a ton of RAM, drive space and buying software.

      We currently have all our old PCs (PI's and PII's) net booted to linux using rdesktop to run windows apps. We could just as easily have them net-booted, connected to a Yellow Dog Terminal Server and running both rdesktop and MacOnLinux - the best of both worlds - If it works.

      Right now we have hundreds of computers net-booting linux, and it looks like the direction we are headed for upgrade, security and maintenance cost reasons. I'd skip the middle-man in a heart-beat if Apple would come out with a Tiger Terminal Server Edition. In fact, I mentioned that to the Apple guys during a feedback session at WWDC and got quite a lot of applause and reaction. Hell, I'd buy an Xserve for home and TS my family Macs into it if they came out with one.

      I'd much rather maintain an Xserve farm running Terminal Services than have to manage software and security on hundreds of workstations. I won't mention the name of the company, but we had a piece of software that was notoriously hard to install and would only work well on windows (in spite of what we were told and demoed when we bought it). Unfortunately, most of the 30 or 40 labs we wanted to run it in are mac labs. Our solution was to buy a Windows Terminal Server and us Remote Desktop from the macs. It worked like a charm. I now have ONE machine to upgrade, patch secure, backup and otherwise manage instead of countless many. I want the same thing with some of our mac software. If this works as advertised it will open new horizons for us and breath life into all those old-but-functioning machines.

      Now, if I can only get linux to run on a Color Classic.

      --
      "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
    38. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by RadRafe · · Score: 1
      My Powerbook 54 17" came with an NVidia.


      Macs haven't had model numbers for eight years. What exactly is a PowerBook 54?

    39. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need an OS for a server where a GUI is uneeded overhead, Linux makes more sense than OS X. Particularly since OS X does not have a package manager.

      In my case, since my company uses quite a few Macintoshes for media production workstations, we have more PPC hardware to use as servers than x86.

      In any case, options are good, even if you personally do not use all the options available.

    40. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ok, this "I, for one" crap is starting to piss me off. Just say, "I do not quite like the interface..." See? It's easy, you save words, and you don't hint pretentiously that you may be speaking for dozens of other people instead of just yourself.

      Worst meme ever.

    41. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by chrome · · Score: 1

      pedant. It was a typo. :P

    42. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by metlin · · Score: 1

      "...and you don't hint pretentiously that you may be speaking for dozens of other people instead of just yourself."

      As a matter of fact, I do happen to know quite a lot of people who consider Mac OS and OSX's UI to be despicable, quite unintuitive and awfully painful to use.

      *shrug*

      Just because you do not agree with my point of view need not mean there aren't others who don't.

    43. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      It's not the point of view that upsets me, it's the "I, for one" meme. You missed the point of my rant, I'm afraid... I could not care less whether you or your friends like or dislike OS X, but when you say "I, for one" you sound like a jerk, and it's becoming more and more common on messageboards like this one.

    44. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by hai.uchida · · Score: 1

      LinuxPPC is a great option for older Macs with pre-OSX or pre-Panther. With one of many WM themes, you can approximate the latest Mac experience without shelling out $150.

      Even relatively young Macs can be horribly slow running OSX... Like the last of the CRT iMacs (2001) and the first few dual-usb iBooks (2001-2002) and maybe the Pismo (haven't tried that one.) Pather is really barely acceptable on most G3's, even with a lot of RAM it's horribly sluggish. My 500mhz iBook spends most of its time in OS9, because Pather just can't give acceptable performance with higher-end apps like Flash, Photoshop and Virtual PC (all of which run fine in 9.)

      I'm not bashing OSX, I would never consider anything but Panther on my G5, but it really has left some relatively recent machines behind. I just might install Yellow Dog on the iBook to breathe some more life into it...

      --
      my password is private, but unchanged.
    45. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by metlin · · Score: 1

      I did get the point of your rant - I was merely pointing out that maybe it does have a point, atleast in some cases.

      I, for one, think thou art taking this far too seriously =)

    46. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      ANd is Oracle and Sybase available on MacOSX?

      I dont think so.

      Aqua is not as configurable as X and KDE or Gnome. Its also proprietary while the gui's of Unix are open.

      Linux flies on macs and has more software available than MacOSX.

      Source builds may not compile on BSD or MacOSX. I have noticed this and gave running Gldoom on FreeBSD.

    47. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      I noticed you forgot all about where I mentioned the USB ports. Try again.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    48. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by 0racle · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Sybase, but there are developer previews for OS X of Oracle9i and 10g. I don't know about any problems with them but since they are developer previews, some things might not work quite right yet. As OS X grows in popularity with the target audience of a software package, and proves its worth for serious computing, there will probably be more support for it in the future.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    49. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      100% 64bit for G5s is one. 10.3 Panther is somewhat 64bit, but there are caveats that won't be fully addressed until Tiger (10.4) is released. Or, you can use YDL now and get all the 64bit goodness from the G5 CPU available.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    50. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that this release of YDL explicitly does not support machines old enough to not run OS X; I have a beige G3 and the YDL page points me at an older version.

    51. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 1

      How well does it work? And which drivers are you using?

      (Well enough to play NWN, or well enough to do basic stuff?)

      --
      Beep beep.
    52. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by wchin · · Score: 1
      ANd is Oracle and Sybase available on MacOSX?

      Sybase Announces Availability of Enterprise RDBMS on MAC OS X Panther

      Oracle Announces Plans to Make Oracle 10g Technology Available to Apple Developers. Oracle Database 10g Early Adopters Release 2 (10.1.0.3) for Apple Mac OS X

      I doubt Linux has more software available than Mac OS X. After all, lots of "Linux" apps easily port to Mac OS X. Some are an easy re-compile or packages may already be available (Fink, DarwinPorts, Gentoo Portage trees too). There are relatively few that are Linux only or even fewer that are only available for Linux on PowerPC in binary form. Mac OS X, on the other hand, has many more software titles available written against Cocoa or Carbon.
    53. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by npietraniec · · Score: 1

      I thought about yellow dog on my aluminum G4 until I noticed that the sound probably won't work along with sleep, my airport extreme, the modem, external video...

      And you want it to run on a G5 ibook? Try 4 years after it comes out.

      You can run kde on darwin, you know... You probably won't have any issues with sound either.

    54. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by swillden · · Score: 1

      How well does it work?

      Tuxracer runs fine. Haven't really tried too much.

      And which drivers are you using?

      The Free ones, I think, with DRI support.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    55. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the point of view that upsets me, it's the "I, for one" meme.

      And there was me thinking that people who used the term "meme" were pretentious jerks. Ah well, silly me, need to move with the times more I guess ...

    56. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our memetic overlords!

    57. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by hunterx11 · · Score: 1
      If you want un*x plus cuddly Mac interface, I thought that was the whole point of OS X....

      I use A/UX, you insensitive clod!

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    58. Re:Linux on PPC? I'll take OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Visit http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/librar y/l-pmac.html to see a couple of reasons why.

  6. Re:Who cares about one more distro? by secretsquirel · · Score: 0

    If it was at osnews would you have seen it? I know I at least check /. alot more than osnews.

  7. Re:Who cares about one more distro? by dn15 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Don't you thing there are better sites to anounce new distro than /.
    Did you just suggest that the Linux section of Slashdot is not the place to talk about a Linux release? Certainly that can't be! ;)
  8. Mac on Linux by kuzb · · Score: 2, Informative

    It should be noted that Mac-on-Linux still doesn't run on i386 hardware - so if your goal is to run OS X or some other OS made for PPC, most users will be out of luck.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    1. Re:Mac on Linux by dr_labrat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unless, like me, you use PearPC, which works like a charm

      --
      The secret of success is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake those, you've got it made. (Marx)
    2. Re:Mac on Linux by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      In a universe in which "charm" is defined to be something "so slow your granny could out run it"?

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    3. Re:Mac on Linux by fum · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mac-on-Linux on PPC is like VMWare von x86. As far as I know there's no goal to run on x86.

    4. Re:Mac on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      The same universe where my grandma has MMX extensions, along with quad pumped DDR knitting needles!

    5. Re:Mac on Linux by dr_labrat · · Score: 2

      No, but I define "works" as "works" and "like a charm" as "better than anything else thats out there".

      --
      The secret of success is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake those, you've got it made. (Marx)
    6. Re:Mac on Linux by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 2

      PearPC works quite well, and is completely usable even on my crusty old 1.3 gig Duron with 256MB Ram.

      When i say usable, it's certainly slow but for doing stuff like checking sites in MacIE etc it's just dandy.

      One of these days I'll upgrade my machine and really open'er'up.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    7. Re:Mac on Linux by deathontwolegs · · Score: 1

      Mac-on-Linux is not like VMWare on x86!! VMWare emulastes an entire x86 machine, while Mac-on-Linux allows direct acess to the hardware by OS X (or some kind of PPC Linux flavor) run inside of it. This is very important because it makes Mac-on-Linux much faster (there is almost no lost of speed)..

    8. Re:Mac on Linux by fum · · Score: 1

      OK, you correct.

      As everyone knows there are no drivers for Airport Extreme for Linux. Why can't OSX inside Mac-on-Linux access the Airport hardware? Then it would be possible to configure OSX to NAT and Linux would be online via Mac-on-Linux via WLAN.

    9. Re:Mac on Linux by deathontwolegs · · Score: 2, Informative
      From Mol's user's guide:

      By default, mol uses network address translation (also called masquerading) and a virtual ethernet network (tunN) to provide the client OS with network access.

      So i don't think that's possible (although it was a very good idea, maybe suggest it to mol developers..)

    10. Re:Mac on Linux by Quobobo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Amusingly enough, it should also be noted that Yellow Dog Linux doesn't run on i386 machines either. So, no, I wouldn't say "most users will be out of luck" when this is a story about YDL.

    11. Re:Mac on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you bother to check your site with Mac IE? At least check it with Safari or something else Mac users actually use.

    12. Re:Mac on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi,

      I don't think the goal of Mac-on-Linux is to run on x86 (at least not in the short term). Currently it is being worked on to run on Mac OS X.

      It works similar to VMWare on x86 except:
      1) It is for PowerPC
      2) It is open source and basically the work of a single developer.
      3) It probably works better (x86 not good for virtualization...). I almost never run OS X natively. I never used VMWare but if VMWare would be that great, more people would use it I guess to have a full Win32 compatible system?

      So it is more for people who want to run several OSes on PowerPC. Without it, people would have to reboot to switch OSes.

  9. Airport EXTREME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Till someone does something about the Airport Extreme problem, Linux is worthless on the new Powerbooks. (And I know it's BoardCom who isn't cooperating)

    1. Re:Airport EXTREME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, the modem and (more importantly) sleep does not work properly under Linux on modern Apple laptops.

    2. Re:Airport EXTREME by nathanh · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Till someone does something about the Airport Extreme problem, Linux is worthless on the new Powerbooks.

      It's not worthless. I'm running Linux on a new PowerBook and although it's annoying that the wireless doesn't work, I can remember 5 years ago I didn't even have the option of wireless and computers weren't worthless back then. I can live with the loss in functionality until a driver is written.

      You always have the option of a USB or PCMCIA wireless dongle.

    3. Re:Airport EXTREME by Tarwn · · Score: 1

      Has anyone tried using the driverloader package to get aorund this? I had a similar problem with the Broadcom wireless in my Dell (work) laptop. It costs like $14 after the demo period is over, but allows you to use the windows drivers for your wireless card and gives you at least basic functionality. In my book basic wireless functionality beats none, especially for such a cheap price (beats buying a PCMCIA card). Just a thought.

      --
      Whee signature.
    4. Re:Airport EXTREME by JanneM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been in the market for a new laptop just now, and I looked long and hard at the PowerBook 12", but in the end, the lack of wireless support made me go elsewhere (a Panasonic "Let's Note" in fact).

      It's a shame; the hardware is quite nice, otherwise.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:Airport EXTREME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just talk to Apple, as they are huge supporters of open source, I'm sure they will release all the info needed for some developers to get it working properly.

    6. Re:Airport EXTREME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Mod +5, Funny

    7. Re:Airport EXTREME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At http://ndiswrapper.sf.net there is a free driver loader. It works perfect for the Broadcom wireless card in my Dell D400.

    8. Re:Airport EXTREME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I highly doubt that even Driverloader will allow win32 drivers to drive Powerbook hardware.

    9. Re:Airport EXTREME by C32 · · Score: 1

      I don't think you'll have much success loading an intel binary on a PPC cpu :)
      Windows = intel x86. Apple = powerpc. fyi.

    10. Re:Airport EXTREME by Beek · · Score: 1

      Okay, this has to be the funniest thing ever. This comment gets modded to +1 Insightful, while the parent (which this comment proclaimed should be modded up) remains unmoderated. LOLERZ

    11. Re:Airport EXTREME by Tarwn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, i got that, just wasn't sure if it would work similarly in that situation (which is why i asked if anyone had tried). I'm not sure how much the Broadcom hardware differs and hadn't expectd the Windows drivers to work, but if it's the same interface and same hardware that runs on a Window machine you never know...

      Basically just curious if anyone had bothered to try (they do have a demo period, and no I don't work with/for/etc them).

      -T

      --
      Whee signature.
  10. Preemptive posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First of all, it's nice that there are now a lot of distributions catering to different needs from which to choose from.

    There's mandrake (yes mandrake ppc is still active), yellow dog, ubuntu, crux, debian, gentoo.

    And to all those complaining about linux on ppc:
    1. Nobody forces you to use it.
    2. Believe it or not, but some people don't think OSX is their favorite OS.
    3. Linux offers way more choice then OSX.
    4. There are other ppc computers then just Apples.
    5. It may not be a weired idea to use linux on a server and there are servers with ppc.

    1. Re:Preemptive posting by acceleriter · · Score: 1
      There's mandrake (yes mandrake ppc is still active),

      For the definiton of active that means "hasn't had a release in a year and a half"? This fixes that latest major release at 11 April 03.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    2. Re:Preemptive posting by CyberdogOSX · · Score: 1

      Linux offers more choices that OSX?

      if by that you mean more drivers that don't work, or a choice of which items don't have drivers at all, then yes, there is more choice.

      Linux is a great OS for some things, but in no way does it offer all of the hardware support and software choices of an established OS like OSX, or even Winblows.

      Linux advocates point to half supported, barely working, rip-offs of office programs, and poorly written emulation, as proof that it is just as versatile.

      Linux is great at serving, and for rendering 3D. there are things that Linux is great for, but it has a long way to go before it can replace OSX or Windows, or be as versatile as a server, design, programming, office, home pc, educational machine, as OSX can.

      i wish that wasn't true, but it is.

    3. Re:Preemptive posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I consider myself a rabid OS X geek but I still use ppc Linux, There is a reason,I use it on headless Power Mac 7600, and It is is only a 225 MHZ 604e,so OS X would be out of the question. Im quite happy with hardware support for PPC in linux

  11. Re:OT for Mac/Linux users but inquiring minds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.scribus.org.uk/

  12. Re:Linuxes on PPC by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

    Commercial support.

    --
    Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
  13. Re:Who cares about one more distro? by Darkon · · Score: 1

    Did you just suggest that the Linux section of Slashdot is not the place to talk about a Linux release? Certainly that can't be! ;)

    I think he was trying to suggest that it wasn't really worthy of the front page.

  14. A load of old Tosh by SpooForBrains · · Score: 4, Informative

    Toshiba. Good line of laptops, with support for pretty much everything bar their proprietary SD card readers. Even 3D with Nvidia (proprietary, yes, closed source, yes, working ... yes).

    --
    "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
  15. Off Topic: Mac on Mac? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anyone know of any equivalent to MOL that runs on OS X? I would like to be able to run beta releases of OS X, old versions of MacOS (for games) and various UNIX distributions (which I often need to write about) on my PowerBook without rebooting or resorting to VirtualPC (which, as of version 6, didn't boot Fedora Core 2. I don't know if version 7 does).

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  16. java 1.4.2 for PPC by zdburke · · Score: 5, Informative

    YDL 3 and 4 didn't ship with a usable Java distribution, but IBM offers a great 1.4.2 version one here: https://www6.software.ibm.com/dl/lxdk/lxdk-p.

  17. Oh dear... by Reverant · · Score: 1

    This is going to start another of those "But why leave the beautiful Mac OS X for Linux" flame wars, isn't it?

    Thank God that is, I just happened to have tons of fresh pop corn near by, and nothing interest to watch. This will do nicely.

    1. Re:Oh dear... by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      Yup, just like those "But why leave the beautiful Windows XP for Linux" every time a new gentoo release comes out. I guess it's just something we'll just have to deal with.

  18. Final release by HBI · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't get the impression from reading Terrasoft's site that this is the last release of Yellow Dog, but reading that article text certainly gave off the impression. Might want to edit that a bit. "Final master for YDL 4.0" perhaps?

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  19. No download?! by acceleriter · · Score: 1
    Geez. It's not like every little trivial utility that's free on the PC costs money for the Mac (although I admit that since Unix has taken over, this has gotten better), but there's no free download of a Linux distribution for it, either?

    (Insert rant about people needing to support Mac developers because the market is so tiny in the space below.)

    ~~~

    --

    CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    1. Re:No download?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the free downloads of debian, gentoo, crux, ubuntu and mandrake?

      Also, afaik yellow dog is also free to download, though you might have to wait a bit longer till it's out than the people actually paying for yellow dog.

    2. Re:No download?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, there are other distributions--although I think Gentoo is the only one of those that's anywhere near up-to-date as compared to their x86 counterparts. The good news is that since this is GPL software, it won't be long before a subscriber throws up a torrent of the ISOs.

    3. Re:No download?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use YellowDog on an iBook... it seems to me that new versions of YDL are first released to paying customers, and then some time later (weeks? months? I'm not sure) they become available to all, free of charge. This is most likely to add some incentive to support YDL financially... I don't see any problem with that.

  20. 64 bits ? by fib2004 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I got through the YDL website and just found out that : Yellow Dog Linux v4.0 offers 32-bit support for USB-G3s, G4s, G5 Power Macs. If I decided to buy a G5, I would expect it to work in 64-bit mode, not just in 32-bit mode. Some kind of strange since the G5 64-bit instruction set seems to be working with Linux. I found at IBM DevelopperWorks how to set up a 64-bit mode (Y-HPC Kernel), but it still seems to be beta...

    --
    Would it not be easier in that case for the government to dissolve the people and elect another? - Bertold Brecht
    1. Re:64 bits ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Afaik yellowdog is planing to come out with a fully 64-bit distro in the near future. If you want a 64-bit Linux on your G5 right here right now you should look into gentoo. (Maybe there are also other options, but I know that gentoo offers a full 64-bit linux)

    2. Re:64 bits ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They offer a 64 Bit version of the OS. It looks like at this time it is only offered as a preinstalled OS for people that purchase hardware. I would guess that it requires some tweeking that they need to do on the computer.

      http://www.yellowdoglinux.com/products/y-hpc.sht ml

  21. Thanks to RedHat for sharing ALL their code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just want to point out how lucky Yellow Dog other distros based on RedHat are... It's only possible because RedHat gies ALL its source code under the GPL, and then the other distros can modify it for their special needs.

    I wonder why there are so few SUSE-based distros out there... Maybe because the're not playing as fairly and keeping key components of their OS locked as proprietary so that others can't copy or build on them.

  22. yellowdoglinux.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have started yellowdoglinux.org to create a forum for yellowdog users. Right now it is simply a forum, but there will be future expansion. I would like to invite novice and experienced linux users to join.

    http://yellowdoglinux.org/forum

  23. Torrent? by thesman · · Score: 1

    So... where is it?

  24. You'd better work on that FUD a bit more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, the old Pegasos 1 (which that usenet post mentioned) is long discontinued. The parent post to yours was talking about the successor, Peg2.

    Second, you might wanna let people see that post in context, including the responses to the post. Perhaps a separate link to the following retraction and apology for some of the false accusations against Genesi would be in order as well.

    And do we slashdotters really need to be reminded of that Theo "The rat" De Raadt is an absofuckinglutely raving lunatic?

  25. Ask Slashdot: Linux PPC Performance and Reqs by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I have a G3 700MHz iBook currently running panther and getting a little long in the tooth.

    A) What performance increases am I likely to see running YDL (real numbers, not "OMFG it is liek teh fastest")?

    B) Never having used Mac-on-Linux, would I really be able to squeeze YDL and MOL onto my measely 20 Gig drive? I currently only have a couple gigs left, but that is mainly due to installing fink and darwinports to get linux functionality. What is the performance of MOL? Better than VPC performance I would hope (since there is no endian conversion).

    I'm just a little leary of wiping my iBook, which is my primary machine, to install YDL if I'm not going to see a significant performance gain and cannot reasonably run my Mac apps when I need to.

    -truth

    --

    I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

    1. Re:Ask Slashdot: Linux PPC Performance and Reqs by Mikeyy · · Score: 1

      Performance of YellowDog essentially ends up being the same as OS 9. Actual processing, say doing a photoshop filter etc, would be the same, however the GUI responsivness is MUCH faster than OS X. As stated before it runs much like OS 9 does.

    2. Re:Ask Slashdot: Linux PPC Performance and Reqs by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 1
      Hmmm... I appreciate your response, but I never ran OS9, so I don't really have a good comparison. That said, I can surmise that OS9 ran pretty well on my hardware since that was around the time OS9 was being phased out (i.e., my machine was top of the line for OS9).

      Good to know. Thanks.

      -truth

      --

      I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

    3. Re:Ask Slashdot: Linux PPC Performance and Reqs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i used MOL on my ibook. had it three partitions, 10 gig each, with os x on one, ydl one, and os 9 on one.

      MOL worked, it was a tad wonky at time. speedwise it was fine (MOL does direct hardware access) but sometimes had issue talking with the network.

      Parts of YDL worked faster for me, notably OO.o (the X11 version vs Linux native). the problem i had was setting up the internet. I had to configure the airport by hand to download the patch to get the ethernet port to work...

      but they fixed that in 3.0.1, so i think 4.0 shoudl be the the same (no airport extreme from what i've been reading)

      If this is your only machine, i'd think hard before making the jump. i had the luxury of a desktop as well.

      fyi i had the 800 g3 ibook.

      ___
      yellowdoglinux.org

    4. Re:Ask Slashdot: Linux PPC Performance and Reqs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi,

      I have a G3 700MHz 256MB RAM with OS X 10.2 and Gentoo Linux.

      I don't know about YellowDog or KDE/Gnome stuff.

      But with Debian or Gentoo with WindowMaker as my window manager significant improvement in performance. I mean, I really notice it. (I used Debian for some time, now I'm with Gentoo).

      1) boot time. OS X takes forever to boot. 2 min on my computer. Note: OS X boots twice as fast in Mac-on-Linux... I timed it...
      2) responsiveness... OS X has major problems of responsiveness. i.e. at the interactivity level
      3) software-wise, I don't know much but it is known that LaTeX runs much much slower on OS X than Linux. There was some discussion on this, maybe in Gentoo PPC forum, don't remember.

      Whether you use OS X or a Linux OS is usually a matter of preference. Usually they cover different market. I go with Gentoo for flexibility, free updates (my OS X is already deprecated...), package manager etc. and speed. If you want a Unix system but don't want to play much in installation/configuration etc. then OS X might be better.

      There is a large group of people running Debian or Gentoo on Mac hardware and there are not to many "commercial" "easy-to-use (or trying) distro. Basically, if someone wants a commercial user-friendly system, well OS X is already there and is a good OS for the market it covers. Debian/Gentoo covers mostly remaining of the market i.e. the Unix-programmer type.

    5. Re:Ask Slashdot: Linux PPC Performance and Reqs by prockcore · · Score: 1

      A) What performance increases am I likely to see running YDL (real numbers, not "OMFG it is liek teh fastest")?

      I have real numbers for you:
      These were done on a Dual G4 1.25ghz. Panther (10.3.3) versus YDL 3.0 (which uses linux kernel 2.4.22f)

      UNIXBENCH (Bigger is better)
      YDL: 316.4
      OSX: 131.0

      LMBENCH Process Creation (smaller is better)
      FORK: YDL: 352 OSX: 1402
      EXECL: YDL: 997 OSX: 3106
      SH: YDL: 3058 OSX: 6443

      LMBENCH Latency (smaller is better)
      PIPE: YDL: 18 OSX: 30
      TCP: YDL: 46 OSX: 76
      FILE: YDL: 128 OSX: 347

      LMBENCH Bandwidth (bigger is better)
      PIPE: YDL: 419 OSX: 216
      TCP: YDL: 176 OSX: 181
      FILE: YDL: 584 OSX: 417

      Basically, YDL3.0 out performs Panther in nearly every benchmark I've tried. Especially when it comes things used by servers. OSX makes a bad server because it's IO and latency is so hindered.

      Mac-On-Linux is fast enough to use for light work, however disk IO really suffers. You know that troll that talks about how it takes an hour to copy a file? He wouldn't be trolling if he were talking about Mac-on-Linux.

    6. Re:Ask Slashdot: Linux PPC Performance and Reqs by g4sy · · Score: 1

      install linux, you'll never regret it
      i ran out of space on OSX (with my iBook) because of fink etc. i installed linux (1 partition for yellow dog, 1 partition for debian, and 1 HUGE partition for my home dirs, movies, music documents etc).
      I'm not even close to using a percentage of the same disk space, and i've got WAY more stuff (movies, programs etc) on there, i'm way more satisfied. I'm not at ALL sold on the OSX / FInk combination, i'm sticking with linux

      --
      somewhere, on a Big Red Sign:
      if(color==blue){speed--;}
    7. Re:Ask Slashdot: Linux PPC Performance and Reqs by miyako · · Score: 1

      I'd like to second this question. Currently I own a handfull of Linux boxes and a 900mz G3 iBook (640mb ram, 40gb hard drive, airport (not extreme)). My job requires me to do quite a bit of Photoshop, as well as running a few 3D applications. The primary 3D application I use is avilable on Linux, but Photoshop simply won't perform acceptably under Wine, since I can't seem to get my Wacom tablet to work properly (tried the Linux Wacom project several times, not sure if it's a problem with their drivers or user error, but best case scenario I can't get absolute positioning and preassure or tilt to work, and worst case scenario X crashes).
      The thing is, once the "gee-wiz, purdy" factor of OS X wore off, I found myself really wishing that I could be as productive with it as I am with KDE. I've considered installing one of the Linux PPC distros, but it seems that they are a little odd, last time I looked at linux on PPC I noticed that there were some peculiarities with booting, and partitioning and things like that. How easy is it to dual boot with OS X and Linux on PPC, or how well does Mac-on-Linux work?

      --
      Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
  26. MOL on Mac OS X Coming Soon by killerc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The changelog of recent Mac-On-Linux releases show that the developer is moving toward a release that will build and run on both Linux and OS X. The latest development snapshot compiles cleanly on 10.3, but fails to run (perhaps it's just my inexperience that prevents it from running). I've seen reports in the Mac-On-Linux mailing lists that other users have gotten Mac OS 9.1 to run in MOL on OS X 10.2.

    1. Re:MOL on Mac OS X Coming Soon by caseih · · Score: 1

      This is indeed a cool development. I'd love to run Linux on my powerook, but without Nvidia support, I don't get suspend or any form of power management. Nor do I get wireless (dang broadcom). Being able to run yellowdog or fedora PPC inside a virtual machine would be great. Of course, there isn't much that Linux can do that OS X can't.

  27. older mac support by beaverfever · · Score: 1

    Actually, that's not so true any longer; vrs 4 does not support pre-USB macs. If you want to run YDL on a beige G3 (or older model) you'll have to snatch up the last copies of vrs 3.x, while they last.

    1. Re:older mac support by bedouin · · Score: 1

      Not true. You can put YDL 4 on an old-world Mac, it's just not officially supported.

    2. Re:older mac support by beaverfever · · Score: 1

      you: Not true. You can put YDL 4 on an old-world Mac, it's just not officially supported.

      me: vrs 4 does not support pre-USB macs

      I never said you can't install it, I said vrs 4 does not support pre-USB macs. Go ahead and install it, and have fun. The easier option I suggested is to get the vrs of YDL made to run on beige macs, rather than the one not made with beige macs in mind.

      You just said I am wrong and then repeated what I said (with more words) as a correction to what I said. It seems modern American politics are starting to rub off on the general population.

  28. Consider adding specific models to 'LIL' by DavidNWelton · · Score: 1

    The Linux Incompatibility List would benefit from the addition of specific makes and models, although do describe the incompatibility accurately so that people don't think that the hardware is completely incompatible with Linux, when it is really only one portion of it that does not make the hardware useless.

    Thanks!

  29. Any small OS by microsopht · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is there any Linux OS that is less than 10 Mb ,and can be run from CD without installing?

    No ,i dont want knoppix.It may be good, but I simply cant download 700 MB image file on dialup.
    So any options?

    Oh yeah iam a windows user.wanting to try linux.or perhaps a new OS.

    1. Re:Any small OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn Small Linux I haven't tried but seems to fit the bill. Its made to fit on a business card.
      http://www.damnsmalllinux.com/

    2. Re:Any small OS by Barryke · · Score: 1

      The local book shop. A decent linux manual includes the distro, you know. Or google-froogle for.. 'mailorder linux' ? oi voilà.

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    3. Re:Any small OS by logical1010 · · Score: 1

      10 MB? Not that I know of. Can your bandwith handle...

      Damn Small Linux (DSL) less than 50 MB?

      Feather Linux less than 64 MB?

      and Puppy Linux less than 50 MB (yes, in(on?) a ramdisk. needs 48M RAM min 128M Ram optimal. Fast you ask? andiamo momma.)

      In fairness, both DSL and Feather linux can be booted with the knoppix toram boot line option and should be just as fast as Puppy Linux. Which is not knoppix/debian based as DSL and Feather are.

      Since this is really offtopic, I won't give links but google for these distros any how.
      --
      There is something wonderful in seeing a wrong-headed majority assailed by truth. ~John Kenneth Galbraith
  30. Re:Who cares about one more distro? by swillden · · Score: 1

    Did you just suggest that the Linux section of Slashdot is not the place to talk about a Linux release? Certainly that can't be! ;)

    It should be obvious that Slashdot is not an appropriate forum for such discussions. After all, there's absolutely no mention of Bush, Iraq, WMDs or Kerry in either the summary *or* the article text!

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  31. Familiarity with linux-OSX is strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not a software developer or computer scientist, just a theoretical physicist. I am an old VMS and UNIX user (I am 52); I've always found graphical based OSes such as Windows and MacOS mysterious and hard to use. I am an early Linux adopter, I started using it in 1993 and I am familiar with it. Mac OSX maybe UNIX but it is sort of strange: the filesystem is unusual, HFS+ is case insensitive, I miss the /proc filesystem from linux, Aqua is not X Windows, etc, etc, the list goes on and on. I've been using MacOSX and Darwin for 4 years, I read a few books about them and I am still not familiar with them.

    By the way I miss VMS, that is a great operating system, as good as UNIX or Linux, maybe even better. I wish I could run it on a laptop. Is this possible?

  32. Re:Off Topic: Mac on Mac? by bedouin · · Score: 1

    You can try and get SheepShaver working, but I haven't been very successful. OS X isn't supported, though.

  33. out-of-box working USB wireless dongle? by timothy · · Score: 1

    Have you had any success with using a USB wireless dongle under Linux?

    I briefly had a (chunky, ugly, but so what) Belkin one working with a hard-drive installed Knoppix system (3.1? 3.2?) ... for me, getting it to work at all took quite a bit of googling, cursing, and trusting directions (conditionally) until I found a combination of driver and settings that worked. But when I upgraded a few months later to a different version of Knoppix, figuring the pain would be less the 2nd time around, I never could get that to work again. (And the Belkin is one of the few USB dongles that's reputed to work well with Linux. I know it *can* work, since I witnessed it, but the frustration isn't worth it IMO.)

    Have you by chance encountered a USB dongle natively (and without tweaking) supported by Yellow Dog, or any other Linux distro? If so, which one?

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:out-of-box working USB wireless dongle? by nathanh · · Score: 1
      Have you had any success with using a USB wireless dongle under Linux?

      Yes. I'm using one right now.

      Have you by chance encountered a USB dongle natively (and without tweaking) supported by Yellow Dog, or any other Linux distro? If so, which one?

      I use a D-Link DWL-122 and Debian/PPC. Debian provides the userspace tools in a package (linux-wlan-ng) but you must compile the kernel module yourself.

      That's not a recommendation though. It's only 11Mbps, no WPA, and the dongle sometimes needs to be pulled and reinserted a few times before the driver initialises it correctly. It does work reliably once it gets going.

  34. No GUI, has Altivec, better for US Navy by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    (1) You can run YDL without a GUI so there are more CPU cycles for your app.
    (2) For some applications PPC has a non-trivial computational advantage over x86, i.e. computation is a good match for Altivec.
    For an example the US Navy's imaging equipment http://apple.slashdot.org/apple/03/08/07/1258203.s html?tid=137