Slashdot Mirror


The Mezonic Agenda: Hacking the Presidency

Ben Rothke writes "As Henry David Thoreau observed 'The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation.' That being the case, novels are written, to briefly take such men, out of that quiet desperation, even for a short while. Novels therefore require a certain melodrama and fantasy element. For if the novels lacked such exaggerated drama, it would suffice to read the New York Times, and not Tom Clancy. It is with such a backdrop that The Mezonic Agenda: Hacking the Presidency was written. The book is billed as an interactive techno-thriller novel." Read on for the rest. The Mezonic Agenda: Hacking the Presidency author Dr. Herbert Thompson, Spyros Nomikos pages 448 publisher Syngress rating 7 reviewer Ben Rothke ISBN 1931836833 summary A melodramatic exploration of the dangers of combining unscrupulous electronic voting system makers with a political machine willing to overlook the systems' flaws.

The book chronicles the final week before security expert Professor Chad Davis is to testify before Congress on the security of a commercial e-voting software product made by a fictitious company, Advice Software, Inc.

Davis' testimony will ultimately determine if the software will be implemented for use during the United States' 2004 presidential election, and therefore create a huge windfall for the company. The company will do anything and everything it can to ensure that Davis provides positive testimony. Advice will stop at nothing to complete their mission; that means they'll engage in multiple murders, kidnapping and a slew of other nefarious activities. All of this is addition to simultaneously attempting to corner the video chip market, and create video drivers that send subliminal messages about which candidate to vote for.

As Albert Einstein said, "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler." The plot could have been made much simpler to mimic reality and the current state of insecure e-voting systems. As in real life, the e-voting companies are getting away with providing insecure e-voting systems; under the nose of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and an unsuspecting and apathetic voting public. The idea that an e-voting software company would resort to murder is where the book demonstrates it is a novel.

The reason e-voting companies and their insecure software can run roughshod through the FEC is that voting-system flaws do not have the same immediate tragic consequences that other product failures can. Plane crashes and adverse drug effects spur the FAA and FDA to take drastic actions and often overreact to an event; poorly written and insecure voting software is clearly not as newsworthy as a burning jet.

Combine this with a public that is utterly apathetic to voting in general and the situation is ripe for the situation where e-voting can have a near hypnotic effect on most people involved. Because voter turnout for U.S. presidential elections is quite low (60% of eligible voters cast their ballots in the November 2000 presidential election), and most people are completely unaware of the dangers of insecure voting applications, an under-funded federal agency can be manipulated by the e-voting vendors to roll out insecure voting software.

The international intrigue of the novel takes the reader to the RSA security conference in Amsterdam, where Davis is given a cryptic CD-ROM by Baff Lexicon, a notorious international hacker. Lexicon suggests there is serious problems with the software and will brief Davis at midnight that night at the Amsterdam Hard Rock Cafe on the details. Unfortunately, Lexicon is being trailed by undercover agents from Advice, and is murdered a few hours later by a Yugoslavian hit man that the company seems to have on retainer.

Davis now has the difficult job of unlocking the cryptic information on the CD-ROM on his own. That same CD-ROM is included with the book, and the reader is invited to join Davis in attempting to decrypt the contents of the CD and the conspiracy that Advice Software is attempting to perpetrate; namely the outcome of the 2004 election.

(If you are not interested in buying the book, anyone can download the software without having to buy the book. The software is actually part of a contest and the winner will receive a free pass to the BlackHat 2005 conference.)

A good section of the novel then details how Davis attempts to decipher the secrets that Baff Lexicon was attempting to convey to him. The two authors of The Mezonic Agenda have, respectively, a PhD in applied mathematics and a Master's in chemical engineering, and write in a someone choppy style representative of their technical backgrounds. Occasional errors in grammar and spelling are excused, save for the egregious misspelling of Learjet on page 154.

The story concludes with a moral dilemma that Davis faces: with his wife and daughter kidnapped by the Advice Software hit man, does he provide favorable, yet dishonest testimony about the software and watch his family set free; or tell the truth and watch them die?

The novel itself takes up 240 of the books 370 pages, with the last five parts dedicated to a history of voting, reverse engineering, cryptography, buffer overflows and steganography.

As a standalone novel, the book (while entertaining and enjoyably readable) is somewhat overpriced at $34.95, especially since the enclosed CD-ROM is freely downloadable and the plot is somewhat thin. The non-fiction final section, though, is quite informative and effectively complements the novel.

This novel does a good job of explaining how software can be cracked, and provides the reader with a good overview of security concepts such as buffer overflows, reverse engineering, cryptography, and more. It is hoped that the book will find itself in the hands of members of Congress and the FEC, who truly need to be educated in such fundamental security topics.

As a novel, The Mezonic Agenda will not compete with books from Tom Clancy or Robert Ludlum. But because insecure e-voting is one of the greatest threats to democracy today, it is a much needed title.

You can purchase The Mezonic Agenda: Hacking the Presidency from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

161 comments

  1. "interactive techno-thriller"? by Trolling4Columbine · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Hacking the Presidency was written. The book is billed as an interactive techno-thriller novel."

    In other words, "choose-your-own-adventure". It doesn't sound so impressive without the big words, does it?

    --
    Socialism: A feeling of discontent and resentment caused by a desire for the possessions or qualities of another.
    1. Re:"interactive techno-thriller"? by RangerRick98 · · Score: 1

      If you ask me, it didn't sound all that impressive with them, either. This book seems like it exists merely (or at least mostly) to promote the contest.

      --
      "You're older than you've ever been, and now you're even older."
  2. Diebold by genner · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone think this was about Diebold?

    1. Re:Diebold by bvdbos · · Score: 0

      everyone, don't worry...

    2. Re:Diebold by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anyone think this was about Diebold?

      I certainly did when I read the title. I was very suprised to see that it was about a fictional work.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    3. Re:Diebold by Tanktalus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      He did. He thought about karma-whoring.

      <tongue planted="firmly in cheek" />

    4. Re:Diebold by cgenman · · Score: 1

      I certainly did when I read the title. I was very suprised to see that it was about a fictional work.

      It's close. Most of the work Diebold has done has been fictional.

  3. Ben Rothke, professional reviewer! by garcia · · Score: 1, Informative

    See all of the other books that Ben advertises/reviews here.

    1. Re:Ben Rothke, professional reviewer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A troll? No, this is insightful with the continued exposure that pieces of software and books get on the front page.

      There is absolutely no reason that Slashdot needs to be come a repository for Amazon.com book reviews. Maybe if someone in-house or even an avid Slashdot reader posted the review then it would be fucking relevant.

      Keep the Slashvertising off the front page.

    2. Re:Ben Rothke, professional reviewer! by jericho4.0 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Ben Rothke is a security consultant and author. This review does not apear on amazon.com. Bens' reviews seem to be well thought out and honest, and as far as I can see, he seems to be providing a service. Considering current events, the book obviously would be of interest to the /. crowd. Here's a review by a critical reviewer. /. has a section for book reviews. So what's the problem?

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    3. Re:Ben Rothke, professional reviewer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, grandparent and parent poster are both correct.

      Unfortunately for the parent poster the Grandparent poster is MORE correct. He does flood Amazon.com with reviews (not this one) though and they are generally boring and overrated.

      Now, as far as the book being worthwhile to make it to the front page of Slashdot. No, it's not. Let's Slashvertize something that's worth reading.

    4. Re:Ben Rothke, professional reviewer! by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      Since when do /.ers care about current events? (non tech related, that is)

    5. Re:Ben Rothke, professional reviewer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so what's your point?

  4. I also recommend... by datastalker · · Score: 5, Informative

    Zero Day Exploit along the same lines. Also the "Hacking The Network" (here and here) series as well. Geeks make great authors, and when they write geeky stories, it's just the best of both worlds.

    1. Re:I also recommend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zero Day Exploit sucked. It is obvious from reading it that it's author is yuppie as hell. If I want hacking fact I'll read a good book like "Hacking The Network." If I want geeky entertainment along fictional tech lines I'll read Gibson or Sterling. What I will not do is make the mistake of ever buying another novel by the guy who wrote Zero Day Exploit. Fucking spoiled upper class twat, I was rooting for the terrorists throughout the book because the protagonist was so unlikeable.

  5. Riiiight by Ghengis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... a certain melodrama and fantasy element... Ha! As if the NYT's bias isn't filled with such!!

    --

    "The best laid plans of mice and men gang oft agley..." - ROBERT BURNS

  6. So, why do I want to read this? by RealAlaskan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The review says it's overblown and melodramatic, that the plot is needlessly contrived and somewhat thin, and the style is choppy, with lots of spelling and grammar errors.

    I'll wait till I've finished reading all the good books before I start on the second string. I only have a few thousand of those good ones to go.

    1. Re:So, why do I want to read this? by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well why wouldn't we put a pointless review on the main page? I have already been modded as a Troll for pointing out that the review is a professional reviewer for Amazon.com and this was pasted directly from there.

      It's obviously a poor book and shouldn't be purchased. Maybe they should have made that more clear in the title. Hell, let's have a story about ALL the overpriced books with spelling and gammar errors. I'd actually appreciate that as it would be definitly "Stuff that Matters".

    2. Re:So, why do I want to read this? by Lt+Cmdr+Tuvok · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Your logic seems somewhat flawed. I believe, unless I am very much mistaken, that reviews of this type are written to allow potential pursuers of the material that is the subject of review to discern whether the material is worthwhile.

      In this particular case, the reviewer deems that the material is not worthwhile. Therefore, as you have stated yourself, you have been dissuaded from reading this particular book. Thus, time that could possibly have been wasted on reading material that is of inferior quality will not be.

      I gather that this means that the review was indeed quite helpful. Don't you agree?

      --
      Without the darkness, how would we recognize the light?
    3. Re:So, why do I want to read this? by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      Did I complain about the review? I was asking ``So, why do I want to read this?'' about the book. You're right, I would never have known that it sucked if I hadn't read the review. Of course, I probably wouldn't have needed or cared to know, either.

      Good review, bad book.

    4. Re:So, why do I want to read this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have already been modded as a Troll for pointing out that the review is a professional reviewer for Amazon.com and this was pasted directly from there.

      ...And you were called on this bullshit in that thread too. The guy may be a pro, but this is not a fucking paste over from Amazon. I'd much rather have a professional writing the reviews than some of the lame asses that get their reviews posted here.

  7. Confused by nizo · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The Mezonic Agenda

    When my brain first saw "Mezonic" it couldn't decide if it was some weird reference to the Mesozoic era or something to do with the Masons. What the heck is "Mezonic"?

    1. Re:Confused by savagedome · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its probably made up.

      I searched for pages with the word 'Mezonic' that do not contain the word Agenda. Nothing to choose from which probably means it's a made up word (or has some very obscure reference)

      Mezonic -agenda

    2. Re:Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I have no idea what you're talking about. Mezonic is a perfectly cromulent word!

    3. Re:Confused by nizo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I did notice:
      Mezonic
      Diebold

      Same length, same number of vowels, etc. I wonder if there is some message hidden here (probably just a coincidence).

    4. Re:Confused by cephyn · · Score: 1

      if it was a time travel novel set in the mesozoic era, now we're talking a real novel.

      I'd buy it.

      --
      Moo.
    5. Re:Confused by infinite9 · · Score: 0

      I was thinking "We call it maze." Mezonic: Corn Goodness.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    6. Re:Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is most probably hinting at Freemasons.. considering that many of the Presidents have been Masons...

      http://www.infowars.com./
      http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/

    7. Re:Confused by thentil · · Score: 1

      Wow, I think you're on to something! With just a few changes, Mezonic could be an anagram of Diebold. Wait nevermind that, that didn't go anywhere.

      Hmm... If you take the letters of each, add up the ASCII values, and subtract, you get 34. 34 is ", which is the only character that could represent the twin towers. Of course we all know what the illuminati had to do with that. Clearly, the illuminati are behind this. And Diebold. Or something.

      So now we know. ;-)

    8. Re:Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aha!! it seem there are masons in the slashdot establishment who moderated me down!!

  8. Grammar? by Linux_ho · · Score: 3, Funny
    That being the case, novels are written, to briefly take such men, out of that quiet desperation, even for a short while.
    Shatner, is that you?
    The two authors of The Mezonic Agenda have, respectively, a PhD in applied mathematics and a Master's in chemical engineering, and write in a someone choppy style representative of their technical backgrounds. Occasional errors in grammar and spelling are excused, save for the egregious misspelling of Learjet on page 154.
    In a someone choppy style? I'm starting to wonder if the author of the book is the same guy who submitted this review. You'd think he would have given it a more positive spin, though.
    --
    include $sig;
    1;
    1. Re:Grammar? by pivo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ha! my thoughts exactly

    2. Re:Grammar? by Suidae · · Score: 1

      In a someone choppy style?

      I had to read this about 4 times before I caught the error. This is why I hate proof-reading. Do people who quickly catch grammer errors read slower, or fixate on every word or something? I fixate on about 2 or three places on each line, so I rarely see errors like the one above, or letter transpositions or even most mispellings.

    3. Re:Grammar? by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think real proof-readers actually read it outloud very slowly annoying their wives and embarassing their children.

      And they spell out loud as one word.

      --
      The message on the other side of this sig is false.
    4. Re:Grammar? by LynchMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      rmeebemr taht as lnog as the fsirt and lsat lteetr of a wrod rneaims in the ccroert piitoosn, the oehtr leertts can be jbuemld and the rdaeer is sltil albe to siflwty fugrie it out.

    5. Re:Grammar? by CJ+Hooknose · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Original article: In a someone choppy style

      Suidae wrote: I had to read this about 4 times before I caught the error. Do people who quickly catch grammer errors read slower, or fixate on every word or something?

      Can't speak for everybody, but I catch 80% of spelling/grammar errors in written work while reading at normal speed. I read faster than most people, too. You're probably lucky if you don't notice spelling or grammar errors. I've noticed that any place on the Net that allows the general public to post comments will be riddled with typos and grammar gaffes, because teaching people how to write and proofread just isn't done these days. Oh well, that makes people who can write and proofread that much more valuable!

      --
      Give a monkey a brain and he'll swear he's the center of the universe.
    6. Re:Grammar? by LynchMan · · Score: 1

      Ugh - how is this offtopic? It directly relates to proofreading and why it is so easy to miss spelling errors (such as transposed letters) in words...

      Oh yeah, it's slashdot - grammer not be understood good.

    7. Re:Grammar? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      This is why I hate proof-reading. Do people who quickly catch grammer errors read slower, or fixate on every word or something?

      Who knows, but your Grammer still loves you despite your grammar and misspellings. :)

  9. Shatner alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That being the case, novels are written, to briefly take such men, out of that quiet desperation, even for a short while.

    From the looks of things, a lot of these novels could be shortened to novellas if all of those extra commas were eliminated.

    1. Re:Shatner alert! by daniil · · Score: 1

      Psst! Don't tell anyone, but the guy that wrote this review is actually a part of the conspiracy! These are not just random commas. They're part of the secret message encoded into the text!

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    2. Re:Shatner alert! by jejones · · Score: 1

      People used a lot more commas back then. For another example, see the Second Amendment.

  10. Re:Translation of the Introduction by general_re · · Score: 1

    Dull pulp to boot. Really, for a "positive" review, it makes the book sound awful. I presume that's because it is awful, awful beyond the powers of mere mortal reviewers to rescue...

    --
    ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
  11. Too close to the bone by BeerCat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem with "real world" fiction such as this is that most people will either:
    a) miss the point entirely (in this case that there is more to e-voting than pressing a button);
    b) think "Way Off - can't happen here" (even when it has!);
    c) ignore the book.

    Maybe the way to do it is be more subtle (like Terry Pratchett, who wraps his attacks on society up in metaphor and allegory), or more gung-ho (like Dan Brown)

    --
    "She's furniture with a pulse"
    1. Re:Too close to the bone by elmegil · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's true for the DaVinci Code, but any IT pro who can read Digital Fortress all the way through is already in category c. Dan Brown is not the way to do it.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    2. Re:Too close to the bone by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Da Vinci code and Deception Point were the typical "all-action" adventure type, which had (some) twists, but made social comment. I was about to start Digital Fortress when someone waved the latest Pratchett under my nose...

      I'm so weak... must read humour... even when it criticises monopolies and takes sideswipes at government run organisations...

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
  12. Time to burn some Karma by southpolesammy · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sounds just like Slashdot....

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  13. How about a non-fiction version? by mc6809e · · Score: 4, Informative

    Considerhttp://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/159 4030618/102-2587016-4696960>Stealing elections

    In "Stealing Elections," John Fund takes the reader on a national tour of voter fraud scandals ranging from rural states like Texas and Mississippi to big cities such as Philadelphia and Milwaukee. He explores dark episodes such as the way "vote brokers" stole a mayoral election in Miami in 1998 by tampering with 4700 absentee ballots. He shows how, in the aftermath of the Motor Voter Law of 1993, Californians used mail-in forms to get absentee ballots for fictitious people and pets, while in St. Louis it was discovered that voter rolls included 13,000 more names than the U.S. Census listed as the total number of adults in the city.

    Election officials are trying to reassure voters by turning to computerized voting machines. But Fund shows that with the new technology come even greater concerns. Early in 2004, for instance, the state of Maryland, which has 16,000 new Diebold machines, commissioned a security expert to try to rig a practice election. He and his team broke into the computer at the State Board of Elections, completely changed the outcome of the election, left, and erased their electronic trail--all in under five minutes.

    "Stealing Elections" gives us a chilling portrait of our electoral vulnerability--in the 2004 presidential election and on into the future. Writing with urgency and authority, John Fund shows how a lethal combination of bureaucratic bungling and ballot rigging have put our democracy at risk.

  14. A clickable link by mc6809e · · Score: 0

    Ah, crud.

    Stealing elections

  15. This is not a novel by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 4, Funny

    The names have been changed to protect the innocent.

    At one time I was a programmer working for the real life equivalant and I was horrified by the apathy the senior managment had for the software's security. All they cared about was having the software ready to sell by the time of the election, not having a fair election.

    I spoke up and after rocking the boat to no avail (I even recieved not-so-subtle hints of losing my job). So I wrote a letter to the chairman of the FEC and my state senator and I was granted a hearing by the FEC where I was to be given the chance to present my case.

    That was when they had a hitman show up at my house. Appearing like a trenchcoat wearing deamon he calmy walked up to my front stoop and kicked the door in. My doberman pincher tried to fight off the intruder but poor Billy got his head blown off by the Spas-12 shotgun the assasin carried. I was upstairs posting on Slashdot when I heard the noise and ran to the top of my stairs only to see Death empty three rounds of double odd buck into my belly.

    I was dead before I hit the floor.

    They took my body and dumped it out in Cheasapeake bay with old fashiond cement shoes and there I remain till this day.

    --
    >
    1. Re:This is not a novel by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      (psst: That's "double-aught" as in "00", which refers to the size of the BBs [or "shot"] used in the shell. The higher the number, the smaller the shot.)

    2. Re:This is not a novel by pete-classic · · Score: 0
      double odd buck


      Your story is double odd.

      The shot is 00. The spelling of the way it is spoken is "double aught."

      -Peter
    3. Re:This is not a novel by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 1

      Thanks, now I know and I will keep that in mind the next time I get a few slugs into my stomach.

      --
      >
    4. Re:This is not a novel by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Great thanks for correcting me. I can always count on the slashdot crowd for correcting my mistakes. It's a shame that I made so many. I had issues during my life man real issues and alot of mistakes were made. Alcholosm, drug abuse, man if it's in the english lanquage and can be conjoined with the word abuse I've had it done to me.

      When you deal with crap like that on a daily basis your just not gonna develop right and do stuff like say "Double-odd" when the correct term was "Double-Aught" but that's why we have you slashdot guys for. Slashdot grammer trolls: I SALUTE YOU!

      --
      >
    5. Re:This is not a novel by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      "Buck" is really buckshot. Shot are little lead balls, smaller than the gage (size of the barrel) of the gun. Slugs, on the other hand, are the same size as the barrel, or they are adapted down with a sabot. (French for "shoe", apparently.)

      -Peter

    6. Re:This is not a novel by Penguinshit · · Score: 0


      (psst: it's "grammar"...)

    7. Re:This is not a novel by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      That doesn't seem like a very sensible naming convention to me - what happens when someone makes something with bigger shot? Is it called a "negative one"?

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    8. Re:This is not a novel by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      sabot. (French for "shoe", apparently.)

      Dutch, I heard. It's where "Sabotage" comes from - literally "shoe throwing" - refering to an event where protesting workers decided to ruin a factory's machinery during the early days of the industrial revolution by coming to work with traditional dutch wooden shoes (already starting to go out of style by then, so this looked a bit odd), and throwing their hard shoes into the moving parts.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    9. Re:This is not a novel by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      +5, LOL (in the original sense, not in the "AOLOLOLOLOLOL" sense)

    10. Re:This is not a novel by general_re · · Score: 1

      The next size up from 00 (double-aught) is, naturally, 000 - triple-aught. 00 buckshot has a pellet diameter of .33 inches, 000 is .36, and that's just about as big as you'll normally find. Depending on how far away your target is, 12 gauge 000 buckshot is quite capable of putting a hole the size of a basketball in it, which is quite enough for most people ;)

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    11. Re:This is not a novel by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Ah, so I guess it's like battery cells (if you want something smaller than A, use AA or AAA, etc.) Still, it seems a bit odd to me. What's wrong with just naming the shot by the size of it? (i.e. instead of calling it 000, if it has a diameter of .36 inches, then call it .36 inch shot or something like that - that just sounds more sane to me.)

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    12. Re:This is not a novel by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Some american shotgun makers used to make 8 gauge single barrel shotguns, up until 1938, when the gun was banned for waterfoul hunting. It was such a heavy design, that almost no one wanted one anyway, so there was little protest. After that about half a dozen 8 gauge shotguns were made under special liscence, each year, until the 1950's, and sold to steel foundrys. They were used for shooting open stuck doors on pouring aparatus, in mills that still used old fashioned fire clay channels to direct molten steel. For this reason, the shells manufactured for 8 gauges after 1938 started at 000 shot, and sometimes went to Quint-0.
      (Either that, or its all a cover up for the Time-Gate project's obvious need for a gun for T-Rex.)

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    13. Re:This is not a novel by general_re · · Score: 1

      It's similar to the old-style wire gauge conventions - 1 gauge wire is .300 inches in diameter, 0 gauge is .324 inches, 00 is .348, 000 is .372, etc., etc., all the way up to 0000000, which is .500 inches. It's basically a throwback to the nomenclature in use when shot towers were invented in the late 18'th century or so - I suppose there's just not much incentive to replace the traditional numbering scheme...

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    14. Re:This is not a novel by general_re · · Score: 1
      For this reason, the shells manufactured for 8 gauges after 1938 started at 000 shot, and sometimes went to Quint-0.

      At that size, that's awfully close to being an artillery piece loaded with grapeshot ;)

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    15. Re:This is not a novel by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Britanica claims that those are called klompen, and that sabot is chiefely French. Other sites support what you said.

      I wish there wasn't an offtopic mod. Your post was really interesting. Why can't we decide what's on topic?

      -Peter

    16. Re:This is not a novel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At that size, that's awfully close to being an artillery piece loaded with grapeshot ;)

      The largest shotgun ever was the Imperial Japanese Navy Yamato, with it's 18-inch guns loaded for anti-aircraft fire.

  16. Einstein never said that by ortholattice · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Albert Einstein never said, "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler." Even though it is attributed to him zillions of times on the Internet (and sometimes even in print), there is never a source provided for this attribution. It is one of those myths that never seems to die, like Bill Gates' supposedly saying "640K ought to be enough for anybody."

    1. Re:Einstein never said that by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 1

      Well if he really did say it Albert 'stole' that by simple restating Occams Razor using other words.

      "Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem"

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
  17. Spoilers? by ajs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have not read the book, but what's above seems to be a synopsis of the entire plot. Shouldn't there have been some kind of spoiler warning? I'm not one of those people who consider the divulging of everything but the resolution of the final cliffhanger to be a non-spoiler.

    1. Re:Spoilers? by daniil · · Score: 1

      The book is probably just so damn shitty (having approximately just as much quality as the cruddy review) that there was nothing else to talk about except for the plot and the dangers of electronic voting. The second part is, of course, much more worthy of mention, so it got chucked under the Politics topic. End of story.

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
  18. Da Vinci code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhh.. does this sound like a rip-off of the Da Vinci code's plot or what?

    1. Re:Da Vinci code? by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      Wow! What incredible insight! Until you pointed it out i had never noticed the amazing similarities between Jesus getting it on with Mary Magdalene and the upcoming predidential election!

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  19. Re:Offtopic rant about the election question thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh. I ran into one of the downmods in that thread when metamodding today and immediately thought of the same thing: that some idiot is bound to metamod these negative moderations unfair (FWIW, i didn't). I guess you should have thought about it before and used over/underrated only...

  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. novels as entertainment by Shabazz+Rabbinowitz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    novels are written, to briefly take such men, out of that quiet desperation, even for a short while. Novels therefore require a certain melodrama and fantasy element

    Well, some novels, maybe. I've heard it said that there used to be a habit in the 19th and 20th centuries to write novels in order to provide knowledge or moral teachings to the reader.

    However, I can't find either of those topics in wikipedia, so maybe not...

  22. hmm ... pun intended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    it's a story about a flawed voting system and the lead character's named 'chad' ...

  23. Parent=Really Bad Literature Theory by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That being the case, novels are written, to briefly take such men, out of that quiet desperation, even for a short while. Novels therefore require a certain melodrama and fantasy element. For if the novels lacked such exaggerated drama, it would suffice to read the New York Times, and not Tom Clancy.

    Utter rubbish. There are many many novels of extra-ordinary importance that have nothing to do with fantasy or melodrama. The parent is describing a certain middle to low brow sense of literature. People write and read stories for a multitude of reasons, and to say that books missing the aforementioned elements equate with reading the newspaper, just goes to show the parent's reduced sense of human existence and imagination as to what literature can be and do.

    Also, the book he describes sounds terrible. I'll wait for the movie to come out and snag a torrent of it in a few years.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:Parent=Really Bad Literature Theory by Control+Group · · Score: 1
      It is also utter rubbish to claim that books which do contain a certain degree of melodrama and fantasy are the exclusive purview of middle to low brow senses of literature.

      Your supposed high brow sense of literature is the same infestation which has transformed the visual arts into an arena where only the most ambiguous or outrageous efforts qualify as "true" art, which has granted some deep meaning and import to aleatoric music, which has made of the arts in general something which, if appreciated by any but the most erudite, is clearly not actually art.

      Which attitude, I might add, is relatively new, and therefore did not inform the great works of the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, or the Enlightenment. Shakespeare wrote to entertain, not out of some misguided sense of "art for art's sake," as did Cervantes, Dickens, Twain and the Brontes.

      Beowulf includes both melodrama and fantasy, is an appreciation for this pivotal work low brow? Both the Iliad and the Odyssey, too, contain both aspects you so carefully denigrate. A Connecticut Yankee In King Arthur's Court, The Wizard Of Oz, War Of the Worlds and 1984 were all works of serious literature containing elements of both fantasy and melodrama, yet also exploring and highlighting the human condition.

      If developing an appreciation for these works makes me low brow, I question both the validity and the value of your definition of high brow.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    2. Re:Parent=Really Bad Literature Theory by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
      It is also utter rubbish to claim that books which do contain a certain degree of melodrama and fantasy are the exclusive purview of middle to low brow senses of literature.

      That's fair enough. I was a bit hasty and inaccurate. However, I think it's important to counter the parent's notion that melodrama and fantasy are requisite features of good literature.

      RS

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    3. Re:Parent=Really Bad Literature Theory by imidan · · Score: 1

      Actually, since the exemplar of great literature in this discussion seems to be Tom Clancy, maybe melodrama and fantasy *are* necessary. Odd, though, that the review begins with a random Thoreau quote (of questionable applicability), but his literature isn't considered or compared anywhere else. I mean, given Clancy or Thoreau, I would be more likely to consider Thoreau to be the great writer.

  24. You're complaining about grammar and syntax? by sudog · · Score: 1

    "[...] and write in a someone choppy style representative of their technical backgrounds."

    That was pretty choppy.

    "[...]the situation is ripe for the situation where e-voting[...]"

    That's pretty choppy too. Hey, are you a computer geek?

  25. Escapism... by toby · · Score: 1
    ...is not the only purpose of a novel. Read some Saul Bellow, he is the acknowledged master of the form.

    --
    you had me at #!
  26. I just finished reading the book... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I got this book at barnes and noble and finished reading it yesterday. I thought the plot was pretty cool but the hack-along stuff was awesome. This reviewer though sounds like he wants to be a poet more than a techie book reviewer...

  27. Free Sample STC Chapter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also enjoyed Stealing the Continent (and STN) for the way they blend fictional plots with accurate hacking techniques. I particularly enjoyed Fyodor's (Nmap author) stand-alone chapter, which is available online

  28. This is a F%$ing cool book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard about this book at blackhat and then bought one on Amazon. I don't know what this reviewer is smoking but this book is really good, much better put together than the "stealing the network" books (that I also enjoyed). My recommendation: buy it, download the software (instead of opening the CD) and if you don't like it return it :) (God bless Barnes and Noble)...

  29. Re:Was Bush Wired During Debate? by operagost · · Score: 0, Troll

    As opposed to Kerry, who blatantly produced a crib sheet and pen from his pocket at the debate - a clear violation of the rules.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  30. Whoa . . . that smells a little like . . . by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "As Henry David Thoreau observed 'The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation.' That being the case, novels are written, to briefly take such men, out of that quiet desperation, even for a short while. Novels therefore require a certain melodrama and fantasy element. For if the novels lacked such exaggerated drama, it would suffice to read the New York Times, and not Tom Clancy.

    Without doubt Thoreau's comment deserves serious consideration; it has been argued that people watch soap operas and follow favorite sports teams because everyday life lacks a certain sense of narrative; however, to imply that the news is not (significantly) dramatic is quite a commentary on life in general . . .

    Regardless of your political leanings, if WMD suspicions, presentations at the UN, North Korean nuclear brinksmanship, war in Iraq, Manipulations of the truth arguably by those for and against war, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, forged documents of a president's military record, and terrorist events in Paris, Madrid, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and NY City are not dramatic enough for the reviewer, then perhaps the reviewer should be checked to see if he still has a pulse. If there was a choice between a "Choose you own Adventure" book and the real world, I would choose the real world.

    I can only guess that the reviewer is either looking to sensationalize his piece with a quote and a small piece of flamebait or perhaps he is one of those that cannot appreciate or perhaps understand the complicated drama that unfolds in the news that affects our daily lives.

  31. Pink Floyd by kzinti · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As Henry David Thoreau observed 'The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation.'

    And Pink Floyd said "Hanging on in quiet desperation is the English way."

    Well, hmm... I thought I'd something more to say...

    1. Re:Pink Floyd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe, good one.

      for those who don't like good music the last two lines in the song "Time" by Pink Floyd are:

      Hanging on in a quiet desperation is the English way

      The time is gone the song is over, thought i'd something more to say

    2. Re:Pink Floyd by wrenhunt · · Score: 1

      To which H.L. Mencken paraphrased as "Most married men lead lives of quiet desperation."

  32. Har har har! I eat children! by Shihar · · Score: 0

    Look I don't buy shit from Abercrombie and Fitch and I go out of my way to avoid Starbucks. I am not a big fan of some companies and tend to vote that way with my dollar if nothing else. However, this stuff really gets boring, really fast. If I read one more book about a fucking evil company that runs around killing people or trying to take over the world, I am going to go sit my ass down at Starbucks and order a something-or-another-latte. No more corporate conspiracies, no more 'megacorps'.

    And for the love OF FUCKING GOD, NEVER - EVER - EVER! name the evil company in your story 'OmniCorp'. For fucks sake, everyone has read that book already. We all know if that OmniCorp is evil. Science fiction is falling down the gutter these days. Jesus, I know everyone is terrified McDonalds is going to make them eat a pile of greasy fries at gun point, but could we tone it down a little?

  33. Book = Reality (Diebold)... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    One fo the authors of this book was in the news on Wired and a couple of TV programs because he found a real vulnerability in Diebold's e-voting software (not that it's probably hard to do). Is this REALLY a novel or a prediction for November?

  34. Already read it... by TheCabal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Bought this last week. The story part reads as pretty bad fiction. Maybe I'm just used to reading Tom Clancy... some of the technical info is good, but there are a few gaps in the information present. There was one part in the story where I was totally lost.

    As for the "hack along with the story" part, you can just download the zip and hack away. The back story helps a bit, but I had already cracked the thing a few weeks ago.

  35. Re:Har har har! I eat children! by vhold · · Score: 0

    *looks around shifty eyed*

    s/\sOmni/ Mega/g

    *submits to editor*

  36. Bougt it on Monday... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The book is cool...not Clancy, but cool none the less. The story is a classic thriller with some cool technology thrown in. It's worth the $23 I paid for it.

  37. First book written in l33t speak? by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

    Congratulations to this wonderful author for not only publishing the first book ever to be written entirely in l33t speak but also for doing it on a d34d operating system, Gentoo. Congratulations to all of the Gentoo developers and users out there, all seven of you. The last gasp of Gentoo has now been captured on the printed page.

  38. Omni-tek is your friend! by Polarism · · Score: 1

    shameless Anarchy Online props..

    --
    All your base are belong to Google.
  39. Re:Free GMail accounts - get em here by mr_tremor69 · · Score: 1

    I would like one, please aaron at netadvantage dot com

  40. sigh by jalefkowit · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lexicon suggests there is serious problems with the software and will brief Davis at midnight that night at the Amsterdam Hard Rock Cafe on the details.

    This is where participants in international intrigue are meeting these days to exchange secrets: exotic locales like the Hard Rock Cafe?

    I miss the Cold War...

  41. Re:ahh, garcia by 3terrabyte · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Well if you enjoy 10 minute crafted blather in karma whoring goodness, followed by a 2-to-1 ratio of 'Why do peole mod me this way", you should check out Sir Haxalot and other fine dumbasses.

    I'm being a dick and I have 6 foes. Garcia has, what, 60?

    --

    Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

  42. Misuse of Thoreau by lkaos · · Score: 1

    As shortly following the famous quote "The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation" comes "A stereotyped but unconscious despair is concealed even under what are called the games and amusements of mankind. There is no play in them, for this comes after work. But it is a characteristic of wisdom not to do desperate things."

    Thoreau deplored modern society. He was passionate about learning and thought that a man should spend all of his being trying to learn as much as possible about everything. He would roll over in his grave if he knew people used his writings to re-enforce fiction--Thoreau had absolutely no time for fiction or any other kinds of "games or amusements".

    Quotes are dangerous things. Don't use them unless you are absolutely positive that you know exactly what point the author was trying to convey.

    --
    int func(int a);
    func((b += 3, b));
  43. Right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The idea that an e-voting software company would resort to murder is where the book demonstrates it is a novel.

    Because no-one has ever been murdered for capital gain, no-sir!

  44. Ick by kahei · · Score: 1


    What horrible English!

    Addendum:

    Using expressions such as 'save for' does not necessarily make you a good writer. It _does_ make you look a bit full of yourself, though...

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  45. Re:ahh, garcia by vsprintf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Well if you enjoy 10 minute crafted blather in karma whoring goodness, followed by a 2-to-1 ratio of 'Why do peole mod me this way", you should check out Sir Haxalot and other fine dumbasses.

    You're not new here, are you? :)

  46. I smell a shill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By "along the same lines," I assume you mean they're published by the same publisher and are part of the same series of novels, each written by a committee of several writers and repackaged to look like computer books to make it easier for IT managers to expense them?

    And as far as geeks making great authors, I can't vouch for the technical accuracy of any of these books because I haven't read them. But if by "author" you mean "novelist," it only took looking through a few pages of one of them for me to say (in the spirit of the political theme of "The Mezonic Agenda"):

    "I know authors. Some authors are friends of mine. And you're no author(s)."

  47. Style and Cadence by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

    Sometimes it's about style, too. Clancy's not the best example, (not that he's not a fun read,) but If the New York Times really worked on their cadences, maybe churned it out in iambic pentameter... =) > if the novels lacked such exaggerated drama, it would suffice to read the New York Times, and not Tom Clancy.

  48. Re:ahh, garcia by vsprintf · · Score: 1

    I see the Friends of Bill are moderating. Oh, well. :)

  49. The clue by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

    There seems to be a clue in the readme included with the software. To save everyone the trouble of looking it up, it's from Habakkuk 2:3 in the KJV.

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  50. Help a brother out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm stuck on hacking the software after I get past the first encryption. How do you decrypt the second file in there (encrypted2.dat). PS "Why don't you just buy the book you cheap bastard" wouldn't be a helpful answer...

  51. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  52. even monkeys do it by Mister+Maddix · · Score: 1

    The book's websitehas a video of a monkey "hacking" e-voting software. It must've been seen by Bill Amend, creator of the comic Fox Trot, as seen in his recent strip.

    1. Re:even monkeys do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This monkey video is a riot. Somebody at Diebold is going to be pissed...

  53. Re:ahh, garcia by phyruxus · · Score: 1
    Garcia's been on a lot longer that either of us. It makes sense that he has more enemies.

    Thanks for telling me about haxalot. I've never seen so many -1's. I laughed my ass off especially because of his latest comment. Lol :) But I have to say, garcia usually has a point, and gets knocked for expressing an actual opinion, as compared to haxalot, who just seems to exist for trolling and flaming. Although looking at Haxalot's -1's made me laugh, I think I'd rather cast my lot with garcia. He's cool.

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
  54. trolls and such by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Dude, thanks for pointing me to Sir Haxalot. Oh, My, God. I read some stuff... he;s a flaming troll, for sure. But I looked at the comments in one of his journals, and it's just trolls trolling trolls. I laughed so hard. OMG. "Please mod up my old posts".

    I think I'm addicted to reading troll posts... (don't worry I won't write any). That is some funny shit.

  55. Actually, he was in on the "Chimp Hacker" stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with Bev Harris, Jeremiah Akin, and Andy Stephenson at the National Press Club on September 22, 2004.

    gewg_

  56. Re:ahh, garcia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm being a dick and I have 6 foes. Garcia has, what, 60?

    You don't have 9 of 13 posts at +5. You also don't have 3x as many Fans as Foes. He does. When someone is posting at +5 that often their viewpoints are more prevelant to those reading Slashdot.

  57. Neither a good novel nor a good computer book by smallbites · · Score: 1
    I picked this up while browsing in Barnes & Noble a few days ago. I found it so frustrating that I couldn't finish it - and that doesn't happen often. The problem wasn't the technical content. As technical information goes, it's reasonable; perhaps a long magazine article's worth. And the material on crypto is well written: good analogies, good examples. But the "novel" itself reads like a self-published vanity work in serious need of a real fiction editor. In a $35 book I shouldn't have to be subjected to sentences like:
    "The car, like the stallions of old carrying their knights in shinning armor, idled roughly to keep him warm."

    (Page 46, emphasis mine.)

    Apart from being a godawful metaphor - which I re-read several times in a vain attempt to figure out exactly what was being compared here (The car "idled like the stallions of old"? Do stallions idle? And if they did, how exactly would that keep knights warm?) basic misspellings like "shinning armor" don't exactly do a lot to help with the ol' suspension of disbelief.

    But my main annoyance so far has to be a repeated story device in which the main character "realizes" that an Interpol agent who interviewed him at Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport must have been a bad guy:
    "As Davis drifted off to sleep, he was hit with a moment of clarity. Why was an Interpol agent investigating a crime in Amsterdam? Amsterdam isn't a member country of Interpol..."

    Well, that's right, sparky. Here's a newsflash: Amsterdam isn't a member country of Interpol, because Amsterdam isn't a country. It's a city. And the country it's in most certainly is a member country of Interpol; Netherlands has been in Interpol since the 1920's.

    So it's fairly obvious the author's Ph.D isn't in geography. Haven't these guys heard of Google?

    And no, it's not a throwaway line. It's a plot point. This blunder is repeated when the hero is talking to his best friend, FBI Agent "Hans":
    "..I was at the airport in Amsterdam and got questioned by Interpol..."
    Hans interrupted inquisitively, "Interpol? In Amsterdam? What were they doing there?"

    Their jobs, presumably.

    The characters are paper-thin and unpleasant; perhaps one should inform the writers that you're meant to like the hero, not think he's an ass. Personally I find it hard to root for a character who's inner character is revealed by such prose as:
    "The flight from Amsterdam had been frustrating on two fronts. The first was the complete noninterest from an attractive but now assumed to be lesbian passenger seated in the seat to his right..."

    This is our great hero and protagonist? Then why does it sound like petulant schoolyard bitching from a rebuffed fourteen year old with self-esteem issues?

    And to add insult to injury, this thing's $35. If you're wanting to read a page-turner on security, just pick up a Bruce Schneier book instead, and use the leftover money to grab yourself a latte and a decent novel.
    1. Re:Neither a good novel nor a good computer book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "The car, like the stallions of old carrying their knights in shinning armor, idled roughly to keep him warm."

      (Page 46, emphasis mine.)

      Apart from being a godawful metaphor - which I re-read several times in a vain attempt to figure out exactly what was being compared here (The car "idled like the stallions of old"? Do stallions idle? And if they did, how exactly would that keep knights warm?) basic misspellings like "shinning armor" don't exactly do a lot to help with the ol' suspension of disbelief.


      I think what the author is trying to say here is that even with all the shinning armor plating, straddling a horse still feels pretty good for a knight's balls in the winter. Just like a car seat.
  58. Apathetic Public by digitaltraveller · · Score: 1

    Democracy is a fragile institution. Let's face it: The upcoming 2004 election will be hackable to unethical persons with considerable technical and financial resources. (Hint: Think of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth)

    Thanks in part to relentless media consolidation, the US public is unaware or more apathetic than ever to this important issue.

    The best way to counter this? Forget this Rock the Vote nonsense. Like we really need more people unaware of the issues casting random votes. How about a campaign to tell people:

    'Don't bother Voting because it won't matter'.

    When people see a message like that, they get ANGRY. That anger will lead to measures to sort this mess out...hopefully.

  59. darn! by zxflash · · Score: 1

    thought it was gonna be a howto guide...

    --

    All the torrents you could want.
  60. Best sellers vs. "serious" novels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Novels therefore require a certain melodrama and fantasy element. For if the novels lacked such exaggerated drama, it would suffice to read the New York Times, and not Tom Clancy.

    But there are novels that are written precisely to read like the New York Times. Admittedly, I could get what you mean by "novel" from your choice of Clancy as an example of a novelist. But not all novels are written to be read on lazy Saturday mornings.Some are written for such serious purposes as winning the Nobel Prize.

  61. Clancy and Ludlum by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    As a novel, The Mezonic Agenda will not compete with books from Tom Clancy or Robert Ludlum.

    Thank God for that. Clancy is an over-the-hill fart who writes books the size, weight and clarity of bricks. Ludlum wrote ridiculous conspiracy-theory novels almost as fat. I regret every minute of my life they've wasted (in moments of weakness, on vactation, I did pick up and read some of these). Like Macdonald's, the aroma is enticing, the anticipation is acute, the after-taste is regret at what you've done to your body (mind).

  62. Already HaXoReD by serutan · · Score: 1

    As interesting as the e-voting scandal is, I've been convinced that the US government has been hacked for years. People whose main goals in life are money and power tend to gravitate naturally toward positions of authority. They figure out how systems really work as opposed to how they are supposed to work. In our political system, people with a lot of money compete with each other to get politicians elected and influence their actions. Every president since Harry Truman has been the candidate with the most campaign money. Al Gore came close to breaking the pattern, but no cigar. Democracy in America works very well for the people who are rich enough to participate in it.

  63. Another abortion of the English language by FrogAlarmClock · · Score: 0

    When I first came to the "Books" section of Slashdot I expected at the very least to see something, anything at all above the high school reading level. Instead, I find a trash heap of poorly written "techo thriller choose your own adventures" and nerds who somehow, against all odds, got their books on open source or some other asinine computer oddity published. If Charles Dickens was still alive to day, he would take his own life out of shock and grief.

    --
    ALLAHCANBESEEN
  64. Re:Free GMail accounts - get em here by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

    All are sent out to those above - sorry for the delay.

    --
    "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
  65. Re:ahh, garcia by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1

    Thanks for proving my point exactly.

    --

    Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?