Slashdot Mirror


House Passes Another Spyware Bill

SkippyTPE writes "The AP reports that the US House of Representatives has unanimously passed a law criminalizing Spyware. This is the second such bill in two days (the first imposing civil penalties, whereas this bill imposes criminal penalties). Information on the bills (HR2929 and HR4661) can be found here and here respectively."

17 of 285 comments (clear)

  1. Maybe another Law isn't necessary by stecoop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's think about these laws before we cheer - say to yourself will the world be a better place with yet another law. I applaud the efforts of the government protecting the people but marketing comes has to come from somewhere; like Nielsen rating system by which advertisers use to by spots on TV, somewhere there has to be a way to understand what works on the internet. The law bill clearly states that installing tracking devices on someone else computer will be punishable by imprisonment - you will no longer to be able to track logins via cookies or be running a risk from court interpretations of the law.

    As for the second part of the law, phishing:
    Zoe Lofgren D-Calif. - cited estimates that up to 90 percent of computers contain some forms of spyware. Lofgren said her daughter was recently victimized by electronic thieves in a phishing scam
    It is good thing that 10% of the market is either running an alternative browser and/or operating system preventing those infections. But being victimized via email I tend to say that email isn't secure therefore nothing in email can be trusted - thus let the buyer (user) beware. Over the long haul, Darwinism will balance things out and the law will be just a hoop and dance show for elections.

    1. Re:Maybe another Law isn't necessary by oscrmyer · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And will this law really stick? Its clearly for show. I really dont think anythng will ever come of it.

    2. Re:Maybe another Law isn't necessary by dewke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You do realize that to be a "Nielson" household you have to volunteer. It's one thing to volunteer to have your browsing habits monitored, and something else to have crap like gator shoved onto your pc because you don't know any better.

      --
      Oderint dum metuant
    3. Re:Maybe another Law isn't necessary by danheskett · · Score: 2, Insightful

      consumers, holding the corporations that make operating systems that are prone to spyware accountable.
      That's a bogus idea.

      Spyware is indistingushable from regular software except in the case of the actions of the program. Short of creating a blacklist, no operating system should or could block spyware.

      Since a huge portion of spyware is actually adware which installs with other applications, it seems highly likely that no matter what OS is used as long as the user has rights to install software spyware will exisit.

    4. Re: Maybe another Law isn't necessary by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because lots of stuff messes with the Windows director and MS would catch shit for it. I mean people got all up in arms about driver certification. Basically Windows will by default whine if you try to install a driver not blessed by MS. People got all up in arms that MS was trying to control the hardware market and force people out and so on and so forth.

      They'd catch even mroe shit for this since it would bitch basically every time you isntalled an app, and few people take the time and money to get their apps sighed (you can do it and Windows does check, it just doesn't say anything to admins).

    5. Re:Maybe another Law isn't necessary by brianosaurus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its unfortunate that there is another law, but its even more unfortunate that it got to the point of NEEDING another law.

      Its unlike the controversial DMCA and INDUCE Acts, which are pre-emptive strikes from a huge lobby, establishing laws before there is a problem. Spayware is a problem, amd its becoming more of a problem every day.

      Sure everyone knows its "wrong", but its not yet illegal so unethical types will exploit it. Of course we're now exposed to the unethical types who will exploit certain interpretations of the law, but hopefully the Justice Department can do something about them.

      Laws don't make things right or wrong, they just make things illegal. The behavior was wrong/right before the law eas enacted, but the community was, apparently, powerless to do anything.

      Perhaps Microsoft (for example, since approximately 100% of the spyware I know of is for Windows) could have come up with a technical solution to the problem, but they didn't so now its a law.

      --
      blog
  2. been there by GerbilSocks · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Spyware will just move offshore. More governmental bullshit.

  3. Loophole City by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From the Yahoo! blurb:

    It would add penalties of up to five years in prison for people convicted of installing such programs without a computer user's permission.

    If this is really the case, this law isn't going to do a damn thing--all it means is that spyware developers will need to put a sufficiently dense bunch of legalease on page eight of the EULA. (It was noted somewhere--NPR, I think--that the typical EULA is measurably longer than the Constitution of the United States...)

    "From time to time, Awesomeness2004!!! Pro may gather usage statistics and other information and transmit this information to the ShadyCorp central server."

    "By clicking 'I Agree', you grant ShadyCorp permission to install Awesomeness2004!!! Pro. To take advantage of certain advanced features, Awesomeness 2004!!! Pro requires SnifferExeDllBuddy. SnifferExeDllBuddy may track and report usage statistics and other information."

    "ShadyCorps is concerned about your privacy. Your personal information will only be made available to ShadyCorp and approved ShadyCorp partners."

    Forget teeth--this law'll be lucky if it can manage to gum hungrily at the bastards' ankles. How about a law that renders post-POS EULAs null and void?

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  4. Neilsen pays you cash money. by glrotate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Spyware installs surreptitiously and degrades you performance.

    What spyware outfit do you work for?

  5. Double edged sword by rhsanborn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, I really would like to see the death penalty brought in as punishment for spammers and distributors of viruses and spyware, but I also think that the expansion of law in this area has the potential for being over-broad and being abused. We need to take a long hard look at these solutions and decide whether we want to let the government try and take care of this, or let industry try to weed it out.

    The government can't enforce a large portion of the laws it already has enacted. So they sit there helping no one, all the while they are waiting to be used in ways they were never designed for. I'm just real uncomfortable with it.

    How about we educate users on good internet habits, and let the industry develop better ways to eliminate spyware.

  6. GREAT by Exmet+Paff+Daxx · · Score: 2, Insightful
    They just legalised adware:

    (a) Prohibition- It is unlawful for any person, who is not the owner or authorized user of a protected computer, to engage in deceptive acts or practices that involve any of the following conduct with respect to the protected computer: ...
    (E) delivering advertisements that a user of the computer cannot close without turning off the computer or closing all sessions of the Internet browser for the computer.


    Which means, by inference, that you can spam as many ads as you want onto a victim box, provided they are able to close each of the ads by clicking on them. Note that this does not prevent an infinite number of closable ads, just as an infinite number of copyright extension laws is still not infinite copyright.

    Note also -and this is important- that they've made no distinction between a program which resides on the box (actual intrusion) and Javascript. This means that Last Measure and other browser shock sites are illegal. Think about it.
    --
    If guns kill people, then CmdrTaco's keyboard misspells words.
  7. Re:sorta OT by scaaven · · Score: 2, Insightful
    install Firefox.

    seriously, I used IE for a while and got fed up with closing pop-ups and saying NO to installing INTERNET GAMBLING.EXE or PORNVIEWER.EXE. firefox is a breath of fresh air.

    --
    I know I'm going to be modded up on this
  8. Wrong Solution by fdiskne1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With all the articles I've read recently, I'm thinking we are going about this all wrong. While I don't disagree with making this illegal, I believe the laws will be near impossible to enforce and overlook those ultimately responsible.

    M$ makes Internet Explorer and Windows to be inherently insecure making spyware and viruses possible. I nearly choked when I saw that M$ may be getting into the antivirus business. If they wanted to do that, all they'd have to do is make their product more secure. About the only reason there is an antivirus and anti-spyware market and a spyware law is because M$ makes them possible.

    No, I'm not a karma whore. I'm just stating what I believe.

    --
    But why is the rum gone?
  9. Re:sorta OT by Celt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes!
    Stop using IE = problem solved :)
    www.mozilla.org

    --

    --
    "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
  10. Re:Simple Answer by Da_Fridge · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Problem is that, this law is really unenforcable. Atleast, not to the point where it is financially practical. The only way to stop it is either to build better programs, or not to go to sites where this stuff begins. I am a lucky one, I DONT (as in not 1 piece) get SPAM. I dont go to these sites and I stay clean. People always forget, the internet is just like the hooker from Thailand. They are both dirty and before you use them you need protection.

    --
    If I wanted water, I'd ask for DiHydrogen Oxide!
  11. Re:Who will serve the criminal penalties by myowntrueself · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "who exactly goes to jail?"

    This is the perennial problem of the corporation.

    Since the corporation is a legal person, 'it' might be responsible, but then how do you send a corporation to jail?

    Personally I think that the 'corporation as a legal person' is one of the great lies of our time; it seriously fucks the law right up.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  12. Re:and so... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They spam computers.

    'Setup your MSN Passport'

    'Click here for MSN messenger'

    'Use this wizard to sign up for MSN internet service'

    Blah, Blah, Blah.

    --
    WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell