Slashdot Mirror


Hard Goodbye to Alice and Bill

cuzality writes "Computer Shopper has decided to let 'The Hard Edge' go after twelve years and two months of 'edgy, sarcastic, reader-centric columns' by Alice and Bill. Many of us remember 'The Hard Edge' from all the way back when it was in the newsprint section of the inch-thick Computer Shopper, and it's always been the straight skinny direct from the Lab of Doom and Pepsi Cola. Though 'The Hard Edge' has met its untimely and abrupt end, Alice and Bill aren't splitting up: they will continue on together at AliceandBill.com, where they write about technology news and will be happy to accept your kind PayPal donation." (More below.)

"They are also signing up subscribers for an upcoming newsletter, but since they can't use the name 'The Hard Edge' (which is owned by C|Net, CS's parent company), they will have to use some alternate name, possibly 'Hedge Yard.' If you were loyal 'Hard Edge' reader, drop by and write them a nice note in their guestbook."

46 of 159 comments (clear)

  1. Computer Shopper disappointed long ago... by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Taken from dreambook.com:
    Name: Michael Franklin
    Homepage URL: http://snmmedia.com
    Comments: Hi Guys,

    I have been reading your column ever since you had a column. I was saddened when I read that your latest column would be your last. I emailed Computer Shopper to voice my support for you and tell them I would never read their publication again and in fact, would probably use my existing pages of CS for some sort of nefarious activity involving dog poop.

    I won't uses the pages of your column for puppy pages though, but it is an apt metaphor for how I feel right now. Like CS pooped on us all.

    I donated to the cause and have bookmarked your site. You guys are the best and I hope to hear more of your unbiased opinions in the future.

    Friday, October 8th 2004 - 01:15:52 PM


    Well, as much as I loved computer shopper back in the early 1990s I stopped reading it somewhere in the late 1990s. I saw it recently on a magazine rack and was quite disappointed to see it being thin and boring. I loved to spend hours pouring over its pages looking for deals and daydreaming of the best computer I could buy on my budget. I enjoyed them because they were different not because they were the same. They offered something that made them stand out against all the other magazines. Why they would change formats to be like everyone else I'll never know.

    CS didn't let you down when they dropped Alice and Bill's article they let you down years ago when they changed formats. From what I read online I can only imagine that this will continue the downhill slide that CS has taken since I stopped reading it all those years ago.

    1. Re:Computer Shopper disappointed long ago... by JDevers · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm sure there are many among us that spent their spare time in the early 90s pouring over the thousand plus pages of a ~$2 Computer Shopper just for the ads. Once I filled out the giant product advertiser card for every product in the magazine, a month later I wasn't the most popular person in the house when about 90% of the mail was absolute junk that even I wasn't interested in.

    2. Re:Computer Shopper disappointed long ago... by sczimme · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Well, as much as I loved computer shopper back in the early 1990s I stopped reading it somewhere in the late 1990s. I saw it recently on a magazine rack and was quite disappointed to see it being thin and boring.
      ...
      Why they would change formats to be like everyone else I'll never know.


      They changed formats because the web made their service much less useful in the mid/late 1990s.

      I read just about every issue of CS in the early 1990s, but as web shopping/searching/reviewing became more prevalent I had decreasing use for the dead-tree version.

      As for them changing format: don't people on /. always say that large media companies must update their business models to reflect changing times and consumer tastes? It appears CS has done just that. Where is the problem?

      --
      I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    3. Re:Computer Shopper disappointed long ago... by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As for them changing format: don't people on /. always say that large media companies must update their business models to reflect changing times and consumer tastes? It appears CS has done just that. Where is the problem?

      The problems as I see them: They weren't successful? I am not drawn to this updated format? The magazine is just like every other one out there and doesn't stand out on the rack like it used to (as I mentioned above)?

    4. Re:Computer Shopper disappointed long ago... by VultureMN · · Score: 2, Funny

      I loved the big fat version of CS also, for just the reason you described. I think they actually switched formats because the postal carriers lobbied for the change. Would -you- want to be one of the poor bastards carrying around a stack of those things for home delivery? The switch probably put chiropractors (sp?) out of business in some areas of the country.

    5. Re:Computer Shopper disappointed long ago... by sczimme · · Score: 2, Insightful


      They weren't successful?

      The very nature of CS - a printed collection of ads and articles (w/ emphasis on 'ads') - was doomed right around 1995. Why buy the hard copy when shopping and review web sites can be updated frequently (i.e. more than once a month)?

      I am not drawn to this updated format?

      Okay, it doesn't work for you. You are not a statistically significant sample set.

      The magazine is just like every other one out there and doesn't stand out on the rack like it used to (as I mentioned above)

      Computer Shopper had its time in the early 1990s. The market changed, and shoppers' habits (and options) changed. Computer Shopper became less and less relevant in much the same way that LPs and 8-track tapes became less relevant when CDs became mainstream. Let it go.

      --
      I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  2. Inch thick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think you're doing the trees that were sacraficed so that I might find great deals on 386 notebooks a great injustice.

  3. Uhh.. by Jakhel · · Score: 5, Funny

    they will continue on together at AliceandBill.com, where they write about technology news and will be happy to accept your kind PayPal donation."

    So they're eBums? ::imagines geeks on the corner with "Will review for food" signs::

  4. PayPal donation? by chrispyman · · Score: 4, Funny

    PayPal donation eh? Some earlier story suggests otherwise.

    1. Re:PayPal donation? by Alice_Hill · · Score: 3, Informative

      First - thank you to EVERYONE who said they liked the column. We loved doing it and still are reeling from the decision to replace us with a shopping section of products and prices. And to the person who said this news item was done as a cheap ploy to get PayPal donations - we wish! The %$%% site is down. Guess this isn't out month. But thanks to all, and I hope you'll check out Aliceandbill.com. We are funding it ourselves for Hard Edge readers and post every day, so we hope you'll like it. We are also "in talks" with a few mags about a new print home as well, so stay tuned.....Alice Hill

  5. People still READ Computershopper? by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You man people still read ComputerShopper?

    Back in the day, when computer parts weren't for sale at your local supermarket - back when you had to go to a special store just to be diskettes - ComputerShopper filled a need.

    Barely.

    It was always a bear to find, say, all ads for tape drives, and to compare the prices of each vendor. It was a PAIN to locate anything special - you spent more time than it was worth to flip through the 8000 pages of ads to find the ones selling what you want.

    Now, you go to [Google/Froogle/Yahoo/eBay/...] and type in a quick search, and there you are.

    Next you'll tell me that there are still people reading Byte!

    1. Re:People still READ Computershopper? by Jakhel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Back in the day, when computer parts weren't for sale at your local supermarket - back when you had to go to a special store just to be diskettes - ComputerShopper filled a need.

      Barely.

      It was always a bear to find, say, all ads for tape drives, and to compare the prices of each vendor. It was a PAIN to locate anything special - you spent more time than it was worth to flip through the 8000 pages of ads to find the ones selling what you want.


      And after we found the ones we wanted, we had to walk uphill both ways IN THE SNOW just to get to the mailbox to send off ourorders to the parts manufacturer!!

      AND WE LIKED IT!!

    2. Re:People still READ Computershopper? by gambit3 · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Ah, yes, the arrogance that if it didn't meet your needs, well....

      I *didn't* read CS to buy.

      I read CS to *shop*

      There is a difference.

      And, boy, could you shop. As a previous poster mentioned, I would flip its pages over and over, and *dream* about the kind of computer I could afford... if only I wasn't a starving college student living in his car sometimes. It was imformative. It was truly a learning experience.

      Oh, and I bought my diskettes at Wal-Mart. At $1/piece.

  6. PayPal, yeah right by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Funny

    will be happy to accept your kind PayPal donation. ... just as soon as it comes back online.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  7. I only read Computer Shopper for them... by M-2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...and Alfred Poor. I think this goes off my list now.

    Oh, well, there's always Maximum PC.

    1. Re:I only read Computer Shopper for them... by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      Ah, yes. Remember "poof"?

      boot was where I got my first Linux distro. It was where I first saw the visage and read the words (outside of a game) of Mr. Carmack. It was where I learned about .plan files. It was where I learned to revere Alex St. John (who taught us that great evil need not be stupid). It was part of what made me the geek I am today.

      Maximum PC showed me that the jocks had invaded. They could now discuss "meg-herts" and "jigo-bites" instead of the fourth-down pass or curveballs. They were the sort of people who worried about appearance rather than substance, who were concerned that the name on the magazine didn't attract the right people - so they changed it to some vague pablumesque moniker. The change was slow but unstoppable. Now it's nothing but "PC Magazine" for adolescents with more money than brains, "Low Rider" for the mouth-breathing computer crowd.

      The good days of computing are gone and they'll never return. I think I'm going to go buy a used DNA sequencer and start hacking my hamster's genome.

  8. Who? by Surt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've read CS from time to time over the years and never noticed that column. Is there really a large following, or was this just a last ditch attempt to get some attention and money by this Alice and Bill?

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  9. Many times the ONLY reason to buy CS by gambit3 · · Score: 5, Interesting


    As a previous poster pointed out, CS disappointed LONG ago. But I have memories of my lean years in college (in more ways than one), where, if I bought ONE magazine, it was CS, and if I bought it for ONE reason, it was to read The Hard Edge. And sometimes for Poor's Computer Cures. But it was the Hard Edge, along with the endless ads, that gave CS its trademark flavor. I have long since stopped even looking at CS -- let alone buying it -- since it stopped being its unique self, and tried to mold itself into a more traditional computer magazine. Don't we have enough of those already?

    Just because I know I didn't say it enough (OK, OK, I NEVER said it...):

    Thanks, Bill and Alice (or Alice and Bill?), for teaching me about computers by guiding me past the marketing hype.

  10. Computer Shopper "Disappointments" by mikeage · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Come on, people, do you really _want_ 1000 pages of Computer Shopper, instead of browsing at any number of online searchable sites? I think pricewatch completely destroyed any need for an outdated, heavy, tiny print dead tree publication. Don't get me wrong... I miss computer shopper too, but nostalgically, not for it's uses.

    That said, Alice and Bill had a great column, which I did read religiously. Unfortunely, it wasn't enough to motivate me to buy the entire magazine.

    --
    -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    1. Re:Computer Shopper "Disappointments" by mikeage · · Score: 2

      Come on, people, do you really _want_ 1000 pages of Computer Shopper, instead of browsing at any number of online searchable sites?

      Yes I do. Even in computers today, not *everything* is a commodity, to be purchased by comparing to see which widget is $0.05 less than the next. While price is always important, it's not the MOST important aspect of pretty much anything I buy, which makes sites like pricewatch boring and stale.


      Ok, excellent point-- but how would Computer Shopper help you? Of the 1000 pages, probably 900 were just advertising... it wasn't Computer Reviewer.

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    2. Re:Computer Shopper "Disappointments" by DogDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, excellent point-- but how would Computer Shopper help you? Of the 1000 pages, probably 900 were just advertising... it wasn't Computer Reviewer.

      The ads WERE cool! You could see pictures, read specs, find that wierd little adapter you needed, find stuff that you didn't even know existed, see all the different vendors, etc. It was fun! Plus, you could just keep it by the toilet, and peruse and peruse and peruse. It was almost as cool as finding a really cool computer store that has all kinds of *stuff* (the kind of store that doesn't exist any more).

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    3. Re:Computer Shopper "Disappointments" by fitten · · Score: 2

      I don't really use PriceWatch anyway. I'm not after the cheapest part sold by a fly-by-night company.

  11. Oops, by JanneM · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is actually Alice and Bob, but there was some problem communicating that info in a reliable manner.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  12. Re:CS had articles? by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's what I always hated about it. Even before much product information was available online, I couldn't see the need to pay $5 for a big book of ads and almost no content. Why didn't the vendors pay to have their products promoted? If they did, somebody was making a big fat pile of cash on that magazine. That's probably why it overstayed its welcome by so long.

  13. My CS Experience by Himring · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I bought my first 386 through CS: 1MB RAM, monochrome monitor, conner 200something HD. I called the company back later to get a price check on a soundcard and the guy yelled at me -- he was stressed or something and only took purchases, no price check cowboy! I think the name of the company was Hitek or something. Later, my buddy paid waaay too much for a 486 through a company in CS called "Legacy Computers" I think it was. They promptly went out of business and so did his warranty.

    CS was a mammoth book of companies that apparently did not have to meet any criteria. The present online way of doing business with sellers, being able to check their consumer ratings, etc., is how it should be.

    No /. reader should be surprised by the death of any paper-based technical periodical, especially one replaced by the modern, searchable, web....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  14. computer shopper USED to be... by vasqzr · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Kinda strange.

    Computer shopper used to have hundreds of pages, and they weren't littl 8-1/2" by 11" pages. This was a BIG book...

    HUGE ads. Remember those Viewsonic birds? Full page, in color. 21" monitors for $2000. Pages of RAM, CPU, motherboards, floppy drives, keyboards. Bargains all over. Giant Dell and Gateway Ads, Micron, Midwest Micro.

    I would honestly buy a couple back issues if I could find some on eBay. They're like computer time machines. Mine were all thrown out as pages were highlighted, torn out, and became dog eared.

    Truly an icon of the PC industry in the early 90's.

    Now, with sites like Pricewatch, and everyone and their brother selling PC parts at low cost, they've basically faded into just another junk computer magazine. 60-70 regular size pages. The last one I read covered video cards and 'case mods'. Basically a 'PC World'. The internet killed computer magazines, especially those like Computer Shopper.

    1. Re:computer shopper USED to be... by Shipwack · · Score: 2, Funny

      Huh, just my luck... I threw out a bunch of my CS from the late 80s-90s that I had in my garage. Now I find out I could have sold them. New resolution: throw nothing away without first putting it on E-Bay!

  15. ditto by HBI · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think the web killed them though, along with consolidation in the clone market. Microsoft can be fairly blamed here as they made sure that with the onset of Windows, that writing drivers to their specifications was required to sell a system. Obvious advantages in mass-production were the result and the extinction of niche clone makers quickly followed.

    No more going to the Chinese guy in the industrial park to buy systems. I remember my first trip there back in the 80s when I had a 286 board that wasn't working with my SIPPs, this guy threw my board on a pile of DOA boards and ripped out a new one, mounted 1MB of RAM on it and sent me on my way. Woohoo! That was CS at work.

    CS was the heart of the hobbyist market of the 80s and early 90s. Drilling holes in toner cartridges and punching holes in floppy disks is long gone, as is building your own system as a common endeavor. CS' time has passed.

    I never liked the Hard Edge much anyway - they devoted too many pages to that. I would have preferred general interest stuff rather, more hole drillings and hardware mods!

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:ditto by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The chinese guy in the industrial park is still there if you live in the silicon valley. Other than that, he's become the chinese guy on ebay. Of course that eliminates the service aspect but as PCs are only getting easier to work on I see that as less of an issue. The last thing to be done to make PC hardware trivial is to actually standardize on fixed motherboard sizes so we can just slide them into place on rails. Er, that and the front panel headers need to be standardized. Then the bar to PC building will be basically nonexistent as things can just be plugged in wherever they will fit :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:ditto by HBI · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Back then, Dell used to produce relatively standard systems, and hell, IBM invented the AT-style motherboard. In 1987 IBM forcibly made their hardware incompatible (with the PS/2 line) and has never looked back. Today, Dell has no incentive to use an ATX form factor, but all third party boards are ATX format.

      I think there are forces at work which will oppose any further standardization beyond the third-party ghetto that we both apparently live in. Yeah, rail mounted motherboards would be nice, and are very feasible, but we're going to have to wait a bit to get them. Even then, the big hardware makers aren't going to participate unless it is somehow in their interest.

      I'm kind of happy at the state of the market at this juncture, though. I have an ASUS Nforce motherboard at the moment and I can't think of an x86 board that was more stable and of such quality manufacture since the old Compaq boards of the early 90's in Proliants. I certainly couldn't get something so solid out of Dell or HP.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  16. Mailman is happier by FerretFrottage · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well I can tell that my mailman/person has gotten much happier as CS has decreased in size. I remember him one time complaining about how big it was and that it accounted for 1/3 or so of his mail bag weight. I told him that I got all the neighbors gift subscriptions. There was a slight bit of panic for a second til he realized I was kidding.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  17. You were supposed to check people out then, too by HBI · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can get ripped off just as easily today. Back then, you used word of mouth to find out who was good and who was not. I had great success dealing with reputable companies that advertised in CS.

    The reason why the guy yelled at you was because the Computer Shopper pricing models were cutthroat. The price checks were often done by competing retailers so they could undercut someone else - even by a buck - in print. There was a 3 month lag back then between ad submission and print. You see the issue.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:You were supposed to check people out then, too by HBI · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you knew my name you could find evidence of me online in 1989. I was 20 then. I know how things worked because I worked for several mail order retailers. You know the one with the blonde on the cover of the catalog that just got bought last year by CDW? That was from 87-91.

      One good way of verifying a retailer, if you didn't have a BBS community to rely on, was to watch the ads for a retailer over time. I kept all my CS issues and could go back two years to see if X retailer existed then. Then, you placed a small order and saw if it went well. Then, you could deal with them more extensively.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  18. The Lab of Doom and Pepsi Cola by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They alienated 95% of the population with that title.

    Everyone knows that IT geeks only drink Diet Coke and Mountain Dew!

  19. I worked for one of those CS Companies by asdfasdfasdfasdf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I worked for an outfit here in Virginia Beach called "Galaxy Computers" about a decade ago. It was a russian couple essentially trying to exploit Americans. While they weren't a total ripoff-- they made an effort to ship things honestly, but FORGET about returns and refunds. There were two competitors locally who both were CS companies, but they were related somehow.. It was strange, kind a like a "russan mafia" thing...

    I liked it because I could get stuff at "cost" I remember proudly buying a 166 mhz pentium for "only" $800. Yikes. Aah to be 17 and living with my parents again...

    The boss actually took a liking to me when I wrote a defensive (and successful) letter to the BBB when we had a genuinely unrealistic customer. A few weeks later, he asked me to write another letter based upon a complaint, but I refused, because this person had a legitamite complaint. Sasha then informed me "They you quit!" I said, "No, I'm still working here. If you want me to leave, then you fire me." "NO, YOU QUIT!"

    Anyway, I think I worked for two more days before he actually fired me, which is the only job from which I've ever been canned..

    It's also the only job I've ever had a paycheck refused at a bank.. (and when that happened they paid in cash) But it was fun trying to find people the best deals, and put systems together. I genuinely loved building computers from parts, (still do) and I took pride in talking to people and finding out what they wanted. I'm nostalgic for the big CS book, and that's carried over. I now pride myself on finding the absolute best deals on stuff for friends using froogle/ pricegrabber/ pricwatch/ slickdeals/ techbargains/ half.com/ you name it, but it will never have the nostalgia of pouring over those pages, circling, dogearing, and calculating shipping costs...

    1. Re:I worked for one of those CS Companies by TheRealFixer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That was pretty common, these "family-owned" businesses appearing to compete against each other, but in fact working together to corner the local market.

      I remember visiting a computer show some years ago, and seeing 4 different Korean-owned tables appear to compete with each other, with different flyers, different company names, even different prices. But watching them from a distance, you could see them share stock with each other. I realized that they were actually apparently from one extended family and that their "competition" was carefully arranged to give the appearance of shopping for the best deals.

    2. Re:I worked for one of those CS Companies by caudron · · Score: 2

      worked for an outfit here in Virginia Beach called "Galaxy Computers" about a decade ago.

      Dude! I still use an old Galaxy Computers 486 under my desk as a server...to this day. The monitor was a total rip (hosed just after the return period) but the box kept on giving. :-)

      The outfit was a little shady, but that box still works.

      --
      -Tom
  20. Yes. by abb3w · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Computer Shopper provides a quick overview of things that are commercially available +/- 3 months of publication. I've seldom bought anything directly as a result, but it's useful to know what hardware genres are rising and falling.

    I also periodically get "one year free trial offers" for it, and therefore have never paid for it. Yes, they want a credit card number for "automatic" renewal. I usually have at least one old card around from when I last took a "introductory 0.99% life-of-loan no-fee balance transfer!!!!!" offer up. I feed that number in, cancel the card when the first magazine arrives, and ignore any renewal notices I get. I have one less piece of plastic to keep track of, one more bank who desperately wants to offer me silly things to use their credit card, and some free reading material. Since trash removal is included in my rent, no problem for me. Not so good for the people giving me free magazines, but that's also no problem for me.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  21. Forgotten Cliche? by Tokerat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Puppy pees on the floor, roll up a computer shopper issue, and give the puppy a smart whack to the butt.
    Couldn't you just throw a UNIX manual at it?
    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  22. No great loss... by jejones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Computer Shopper went down the tubes when Ziff-Davis bought it from Stan Veit, told all the "classic computer" columnists to buzz off, and turned it into a PClone-only rag.

    As has been copiously noted, it lost its only remaining function when it became far easier to get far more up-to-date data on the Web. I'm not sure whether I saved any of the 1000+ page issues from the era when I called it "Deforestation Monthly," but it's sad to see it now at about 170 pages. The date of its demise can't be that far off.

  23. Rendered Obsolete by the march of tech by cyclocommuter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Way back in the late 80's up to the mid 90's, when web shopping was non existent or at its infancy and you can only get stuff mostly thru mail order, CS was the Bible. I used to enjoy reading CS cover to cover looking at comparisons of PCs, scanners, hard drives, image editing software, etc. I also enjoyed reading Hard Edge by Alice and Bill in their lab of Doom. Sadly, CS is now but a parody of its former self... made nearly useless by NewEgg, Amazon, etc., on the shopping front and by sites such as AnandTech, Tom's, HardOCP, etc., on the hardware analysis front.

    I am actually surprised CS/Hard Edge lasted this long... such is the furious pace of progress specially in tech... almost everything will be rendered obsolete sooner or later.

  24. How about the OLD computer shopper? by nothingtodo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember reading it back in the late 1980s. Page after page of enticing computers and equipment at prices I could not afford! There used to be sections on various models, such as Apple, Atari, and so on. Didnt Don Lancaster write a column in there too? In the back was for sale and wanted sections for computer types listed in alphabetical order most of which are not with us anymore. I enjoyed looking at the Apple // clones and parts available to build your own and I remember a review they had on the Basis-108. There was also lots of BBS numbers to attempt to connect to. I saw some of these old rags in a used bookstore once and wished I bought them just for old times sake.

    --
    -- After all is said and done, more is said than done.
  25. old CS by Reglar_Joe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not only did I have a sub to both CS and Byte, but I frequented the compuserve CS forum, where Bill talked mostly about his Camaro. My only claim to fame is that I got a letter printed in Hard Edge, detailing my regrets with OS/2, the OS I tried so hard to love.

  26. Thanks to everyone for the support! by Alice_Hill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First - thank you to EVERYONE who said they liked the column. We loved doing it and still are reeling from the decision to replace us with a shopping section of products and prices. And to the person who said this news item was done as a cheap ploy to get PayPal donations - we wish! The %$%% site is down. Guess this isn't out month. But thanks to all, and I hope you'll check out Aliceandbill.com. We are funding it ourselves for Hard Edge readers and post every day, so we hope you'll like it. We are also "in talks" with a few mags about a new print home as well, so stay tuned.....Alice Hill

  27. Re:Actually by Alice_Hill · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That is true, the Hard Edge was named and writted by Rich Santalesa and Dave Harvey. We inherited the column when they left to start a magazine. Rich actually created the whole Shopper "Tech Section" which at the time had great articles on programming, and early pre Web stuff by Steven J. Vaugh Nichols, and of course Stan Veit's great "Whatever happened to..." column. (Stan has been so supportive since this happened.) The Tech Section when I was running it after Rich left was almost 35 pages or almost the entire size of an average magazine. Those Shopper pages were huge too, but we could run longer articles back when it was a phone book. The original Hard Edge was actually a whopping 4,000 words but finally got chopped to 1,800. It was hard to not have the room to do the weird charts and in-depth stuff we used to be able to do with all that space. But I think we managed to keep in some of the humor. It sure was fun to write. --Alice Hill

  28. The natural progression of computer magazines... by dtobias · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The evolution (devolution) of Computer Shopper fits the natural way computer magazines have always progressed (regressed), a phenomenon that predates the Internet by many years (I was griping about it as early as 1983 when it happened to the likes of Creative Computing and InfoWorld).

    Normally, computer magazines start out being of, by, and for enthusiasts / hobbyists / "geeks", and are interestingly quirky as a result, but over the years they gradually become more "mainstream", slick, and corporate, with editorial policies dictated by the advertisers (and, specifically, the ones who buy full-page, full-color ads, not mom-and-pop classifieds) rather than the desires of the current readers (the management starts pining after the holy grail of a huge mainstream readership they hope to find if their content can be made more acceptable to Corporate America).

    Usually, they fail to get this mass readership or the big ad dollars it's supposed to produce, so they go out of business in the end; maybe they could have survived if they kept their original format and a budget based on a cult-following audience instead of pipe dreams of something bigger.

    --
    --Dan
    Web Tips