Slashdot Mirror


Netscape Turns 10

An anonymous reader writes "Today marks ten years since the first public beta of Netscape Navigator was released. Both CNet News.com and MozillaZine have full coverage, with the former revealing that AOL is planning to release a new version Netscape in the New Year (thankfully separate from the IE-based version of AOL's browser). Even the Netscape portal (which never mentions the Netscape browser) is celebrating the anniversary. A lot of water has passed under the bridge in the last decade (especially since AOL bought Netscape) and the baton has now passed onto the Netscape alumni-filled Mozilla Foundation, but it's still worth remembering that Netscape changed the world not once (by making the first really good browser), but twice (by being the first major commercial program to go open source)."

33 of 299 comments (clear)

  1. Cool, cool, cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hard to believe it's been 10 years. Time flies when your having fun! I don't remember which version of Netscape I used first, but I remeber downloading the code when it became available. That was one cool day for me.

    1. Re:Cool, cool, cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was kind of surprised to see it's been ten years. It seems longer ago than that.

      I guess the IE years haven't been much fun ;)

    2. Re:Cool, cool, cool by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember the hype surrounding the 2.0 launch. It was going to be 8MB, and considered hugely bloated at this size (considering that at the time, my hard drive was 60MB, and a full install of MS Word took 10MB including clipart). After Netscape 2 was launched, no one was going to care what OS they were using. All software was going to be run through the browser.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  2. for nostagic purposes... by trance29 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is there an netscape archive of all the netscape versions released? it would be interesting to run the old version for memory sakes...

    1. Re:for nostagic purposes... by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I still run a quadra (mac 7.5) and a 280c powerbook (7.0) that have netscape 2 on them*. But I have since added iCab, which is a much better browser on those old 68k machines. I also have a couple of IIcis I think they are, but been so long since I booted them I forget what's on them now, but I know they surfed when I was using them. I even used to get decent real audio on the quadra back when that app was fairly new, nowadays though no one streams any real audio 2 I think it was. And IRC and FTP and gopher always worked fine.

      *once in awhile, they are old machines I gave to my GF after I cleaned them up and tweaked them a scosh. The quadra with 64 megs ram is quite a decent surfer really as long as the pages aren't too javaised or scripted to timbuktu. I even ran it as a server for a while using quid pro quo server software. The 280c PB I use as a "storm" computer when the power goes out, all I have for it is a car batt adapter so I run it off an old truck battery with it's built in 19.2 modem. it works fine for that purpose the few times a year I have to.

      I *like* hanging on to my nostalgia, I still have my 512k and it still boots! The floppy based OS still works! Well, last time I tried it, I admit it's about 9 months now since the last time.

  3. Re:The old netscape by SmilingBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You are lucky! I ran Netscape (3.something? Gold?) on a 486/33 with 4 MB RAM... That was in the beginning of 1998 (when the computer was already 5 years old). I did have a 14,400 modem, and at times the computer would take longer rendering sites than it took for the data to come in. Seriously though, for WWW, this setup was pretty unusable, but it was fine for E-Mail.

  4. the old days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ahh the old days.
    I remember running the .9X betas on my SS2 running 4.1.3U1. The best part was having to modify libc to support DNS lookups, as sun out of the box supported yp (nis) and hosts.

    obligatory: In my day we didnt need no stinking nsswitch.conf.

    -- C

  5. DevEdge is offline by Codeala · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just in time for DevEdge to be shutdown too...

    http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article =5 381

    Whats up with that?

    --

    Codeala - Just another mindless drone
  6. Found the original program by tao_of_biology · · Score: 4, Interesting
    For those who haven't seen it, or those who want to relive it, I found Netscape 0.9 beta (from 10-27-1994) here.

    I haven't actually tried running running it, but the links seems to be working.

    I wonder if slashdot is renderable under Netscape 0.9...

    --

    -- "A chicken is an egg's way of making another egg."

    1. Re:Found the original program by mixmasterjake · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just tried it. Ah, the memories. I remember downloading this along with trumpet winsock - it was like a new world!

      I just gave it a quick trial and here's some interesting results:

      slashdot.org - doesn't work (promps for a file download)

      netscape.com - loads, then immediately crashes the browser

      microsoft.com - loads fine, but looks plain !!

      --
      TODO: come up with a clever sig
  7. Feel the Original: Dejavu Emulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For the youngins, you can use a Netscape emulator (and Mosaic and early IE) to feel what it was like. It's fun to see what sites do and see if they even load.

    I'm probably /.'ing it with this, but it does say "Sorry, due to heavy load on the server, browsing is quite slow. On the positive side, it makes the experience even more authentic.."

    I especially love "You probably forgot the "http://" part. Remember: the old browsers did not provide that service... Give it another try!" when you enter a URL without the http:// component.

  8. Evil company... by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 3, Interesting

    AOL completely killed any glimpse of hope Netscape had to win the 'browser war'... imagine if Firefox came with AIM, ads that pop up everywhere, installed 2-3 advertising gimmicks, put links everywhere about itself... and didn't have any features over IE. I completely stopped using Netscape, which was by far my favorite browser at the time, when they released the AOL version (6 I think?).

    Netscape is dead, long live Netscape! (in Firefox's form!)

  9. We need to keep re-inventing the browser by Eloquence · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Firefox is gaining some momentum - maybe enough to make web developers take note. The Mozilla project also has two other great Firefox-like (small single-purpose applications) initiatives, Sunbird and Thunderbird.

    The important thing right now is that we use this momentum, and that we continue to innovate. Here's some issues I believe are important:

    • SVG support. It's incomplete - but I think it is unwise not to have at least some level of SVG support in mainline Firefox 1.0 builds. "Build it, and they will come": both web and Mozilla developers. SVG is really a key technology for next-generation web design based on open standards. As an example, Wikipedia has a nice extension called EasyTimeline for rendering graphical timelines. These are currently ugly, non-zoomable PNGs -- SVG would be perfect here, as it would allow timelines with a changing level of detail as you zoom in. Much of the stuff that is currently being done with Flash can be done with SVG.
    • Leverage XUL. Whenever I show people demos like MAB and Robin, they tend to be impressed: easy, powerful, instantly deployable web applications. In my opinion, XUL should get a lot more exposure within Firefox - both the product and the website. Make a promise to XUL developers: If you use XUL to write open source applications, and it meets our quality standards, we will add it to the default Firefox bookmarks, and promote it on our website.
    • New UIs. Tabs are great, but they're not the Holy Grail of UI design. For example, they don't scale - managing more than 20 or so open documents in one browser is not feasible because you just have lots of "..."s. At this point, I would rather have a vertical, scrollable list of open documents with a nice, dynamic (incremental) title search to instant-switch to a window of your choice, and some other cool navigation tools ("skip to next website from another domain than the current one" etc.). There's no reason why a modern browser shouldn't make it easy to manage 50 or 100 open documents.
    • Better editing controls. Yes, I know what you're thinking: Keep Firefox lean. But having a good integrated text editor for things like wikis or even this form into which I'm typing into right now makes life a lot easier for the average user.

    Now, if you really want a glimpse of the future, imagine, if you will, that a HTML textarea worked like SubEthaEdit and allowed you to invite other users to edit with your collaboratively, in real-time, a wiki page or weblog entry. But even this really just scratches the surface. The point is, the browser is an immensely important platform. With Firefox, we now have the chance to give an incredible amount of real power to end users. It's not "just a browser" - it's one of the key components of future information and collaboration devices.

    Congratulations to the Mozilla project for getting us where we are right now. We still have a long way to go. I hope in 10 years, open source technology will be used by virtually everyone to access the rapidly growing digital commons.

    1. Re:We need to keep re-inventing the browser by WankersRevenge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Firefox is gaining some momentum - maybe enough to make web developers take note

      Just to let you know ... I work in the internet division of a major sports network. Let me just say, that in my department all developers and engineers are not only aware of Firefox, but use it primarily as their browser of choice.

    2. Re:We need to keep re-inventing the browser by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Whenever I show people demos like MAB and Robin, they tend to be impressed

      Except that it only works on Mozilla browsers. I don't care how open source Mozilla is, these kinds of applications only perpetuate the idea that one must standardize on a particular browser. This application-is-the-standard mindset must go.

      Right now my work is deploying IE web apps as fast as they possibly can. It's not annoying that I have to switch over to IE to use these, it's annoying that I have to switch over from my currently open browser to begin with, regardless of brand or openness.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  10. Netscape Navigator 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If memory serves, that release introduced the world to Java (browser integrated), JavaScript, plugins, frames, SSL, and cookies, all about a year and a half after the founding of the company.

    Now *that* was a major feature release.

  11. Re:The old netscape by singularity · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ehh, If you are talking the same time as IE, you are not thinking old enough. Once Netscape 3.x came out (which, if I remember correctly, was about the time IE was first released), it was pretty bulky.

    Back when you were able to get just Netscape Navigator (the stand-alone browser without the HTML editor, mail client, and so on), it was pretty smooth. I remember running 2.2N on my Mac for a long time (up until about Netscape 4.1.7 or so)

    Of course, that was some time after Netscape hit the scene. I remember downloading Mosaic for the first time sometime around Christmas break of 1993-1994. Netscape 0.9 was sometime after that.

    I liked to tell my students (when I was working in a high school) that there used to be a page called "What is new on the Internet" that would list all new pages to go up.

    Netscape started out a good browser, but the 3.x bloat really slowed progress down. That was back when Netscape seemed on top of the world, though. Portal, web server, web browser, mail client, news client, you name it. For the briefest amount of time, before Microsoft woke up, they seemed to control the Internet.

    It is interesting to see projects like Firefox finally getting back to the simplicity of the original Netscape browsers.

    --
    - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
  12. The funny thing is by BCW2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I go online in Windows at home (rare) I still use Netscape, even upgraded it to 7.1, because I'm a cantankerous old fart. At work or in Linux I always use Firefox, never liked IE, never thought Gates had the right to tell me what had to be on a box he didn't pay for, running on an electric bill he didn't pay. That feeling hasn't changed. The average user couldn't find a way to start it on my machine (XP). Hell, I used Lotus Smart suite for 8 years, just to avoid office, at less than half the price. Now? OO, no matter which OS is running, WinXP/RH9/Suse 9.1.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  13. Re:First?!? by typhoonius · · Score: 3, Interesting

    NCSA Mosaic was programmed by Marc Andreessen, who, of course, created Netscape Communications, so I guess it's all in the family.

  14. Re:The old netscape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    > but the 3.x bloat really slowed progress down

    Netscape 3 wasn't so bad on my (at that time) ancient Mac IIfx. When Netscape 4.00 came out and took about 5 minutes just to make the window appear, that was the breaking point.

    Anyone else remember that java atrocity "Netcaster"? The thing that would crunch your harddrive for about 5 minutes before crashing. That's about exactly when Netscape jumped the shark.

  15. Re:The old netscape by gmajor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Started off using Lynx on 2400 baud :-)

    A few months later I finally got my hands on a PPP connection and used Netscape 1.1. Still remember the animated shooting star Netscape that would display when a pag was loading.

    Back in the day... when Geocities was called "Beverly Hills Internet" and Webcrawler was the alternative to Yahoo.

    Curiously, I also remember when Netscape began to offer serious cash bounties (~$1,000) for anyone who discovered security holes in their browser. I wish Microsoft would do that.

  16. netscape page doesn't render in firefox? by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is it bad that the netscape page:
    http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/storymain.jsp?num ber=1 doesn't render correctly in the latest firefox?

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  17. Re:Screenshots and a Mirror by BladeMelbourne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    .

    http://users.tpg.com.au/meglet/nS09b.jpg

    When I'm not using Linux, I use Windows 3.11
    It's the most stable version of Windows I have ever used. And I have tried most versions...

    ;-)

  18. Netscape Dorm by Mr+Fodder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't forget this little jem: NSCP Dorm (Netscape Dorm). Jamie Zawinski kept a diary of sorts about Netscape starting up. Some off-topic but almost always interesting nonetheless.

  19. Re:The First Netscape was revolutionary by metlin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, reminds me of the line from JWZ's website -

    When we started this company [Netscape], we were out to change the world. And we did that. Without us, the change probably would have happened anyway, maybe six months or a year later, and who-knows-what would have played out differently. But we were the ones who actually did it. When you see URLs on grocery bags, on billboards, on the sides of trucks, at the end of movie credits just after the studio logos -- that was us, we did that. We put the Internet in the hands of normal people. We kick-started a new communications medium. We changed the world.

    Indeed. They very much were the ones who brought the WWW to the masses.

  20. Re:First?!? by grotgrot · · Score: 4, Interesting
    What was wrong with Mosaic?

    The single biggest problem with Mosaic was that it wouldn't display any of the page until it had downloaded every single image and worked out what size they were. IIRC it also only used one network connection to do the image downloads. The big thing that made people say "wow" about Netscape was it showing you the page and then filling in the images, reflowing the page as necessary. That resulted in people dropping Mosaic real quick.

    Mosaic was also most at home on Unix. That was all fine for people like me who used Sun Workstations at work, but most didn't have that. The Windows and Mac versions lagged the Unix version, and had to have a lot of different code due to OS differences (those were the days of Win16 for example).

    IIRC Netscape was also the first browser to implement tables and do a decent job of it. Within a month or less of the first release of Netscape, I didn't know anyone who used Mosaic any more. There were some more releases of Mosaic by uiuc, but most of their browser and server people had gone to Netscape.

  21. Safari startpage URL for non Safari users by Sophrosyne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://apple.netscape.com/apple.adp
    Apparently Apple will be switching to this page:
    http://www.apple.com/startpage/

  22. Netscape Mosaic v 0.93 Beta/Scrnshots/Easter Eggs by jeremie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://jeremie.com/misc/moz/ is a page I put together some time ago that has a slightly newer rev of the original with some screenshots and as much as I could dig out of the executable as far as easter eggs, the about:authors is pretty cool IMO :)

    Man, I spent so much time in awe in front of that thing, last time that happened was OSX... the net really needs something cool again.

  23. Best Netscape innovation by lothar97 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember beta testing Netscape 0.9. At the time, my college only had Mosaic, easiest to use on Unix terminals. Netscape brought better browsers to the Mac and PC, and also had a really novel innovation: the stop button. I remember how much it used to suck going to a website (using Mosaic), and having to wait for a massive page to load. With Netscape, I could click the stop button, and move about my business. That's what changed the web...!

    --

  24. Netscape Portal by lavar78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's outstanding news! On another note, the Netscape portal made a key contribution of its own. Remember, it was the first major site to use RSS. I used "My Netscape" for a long time just for that reason.

    --
    "Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
    1. Re:Netscape Portal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      On another note, the Netscape portal made a key contribution of its own. Remember, it was the first major site to use RSS.

      That'll be because Netscape invented RSS.

  25. Re:The old netscape by Angostura · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What's new on the Web was hosted as SAIC, I think, required daily reading. Ah yes, I remember when the Cambridge University Trojan Room coffee-pot cam was put on-line, how cool was that?

    I'd like to take issue with the original poster's assertion that Netscape was the first major piece of commercial software to go Open... It may have been available for sale, but Netscape would never reveal how many licenses were sold. I don't think you could call it 'major commercial' judged from the commercial revenues.

  26. Mosaic by shokk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mosaic changed the world and introduced us to the WWW. Netscape, Mozilla, and IE just improved on what had already been launched.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."