Slashdot Mirror


Students Design A Satellite Via Internet

Roland Piquepaille writes "A group of 250 students from many European universities has collectively designed a satellite by using a dedicated news server and weekly chats on Internet. By using the Web, the virtual team was able to move from design to construction in less than a year. The SSETI Express is currently under integration in one of the technology centers of the European Space Agency (ESA) in the Netherlands. Only a few selected members of the team will attend the launch which will be part of the Russian mission Cosmos DMC-3 in May 2005. The SSETI Express will embark three mini 'cubesats' for specific experiments while the main satellite will test a propulsion system and act as a transponder for amateur radio users. I sure hope that this collaborative action will be successful. Read this summary for more details."

137 comments

  1. Design to construction in less than a year... by goretexguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Great. But will it work properly?

    1. Re:Design to construction in less than a year... by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

      only for the next two years. After the internet dies, this satellite is history too.

    2. Re:Design to construction in less than a year... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 0, Funny

      But Noooooooooooooooooo it's Skylab!!!

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:Design to construction in less than a year... by mitchus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The point is not really to get it to work properly, it's to interest students in space tech.
      Space missions are a problem, because the project lifespan from first spade to launch is typically five to ten years, too long for students to have a chance to get involved without a career decision.
      These cubesats are an excellent idea, because they can hitch a ride on some commercial launch since their payload&volume are minimal.

    4. Re:Design to construction in less than a year... by goretexguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree, mostly.

      It's nice to allow students (and their professors) this opportunity, but given their very small size (10cm!) these aren't terribly useful or complex creations.

      They're more like the 'Hello, World!' version of satellites. How instructive can these things be? Perhaps the real lesson is how the distributed group worked together, rather than what they produced?

    5. Re:Design to construction in less than a year... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Space missions are a problem, because the project lifespan from first spade to launch is typically five to ten years, too long for students to have a chance to get involved without a career decision.
      Welcome to the real world of engineering. Few projects of any value take less than five to ten years, it's not unique to space, but common to every engineering discipline.
      These cubesats are an excellent idea, because they can hitch a ride on some commercial launch since their payload&volume are minimal.
      Assuming that the commercial customer gives his OK for the weight and volume to be released, and is satisfied that the parasite poses no threat to his bird. It's not a simple process.
    6. Re:Design to construction in less than a year... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      What I don't get is various design programs (I'm thinking Autodesk stuff here) have had online collaboration built into them for a while now, other than the fact this thing goes into space, what's the big deal?

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    7. Re:Design to construction in less than a year... by Zuul · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well being one of the students working on SSETI-Express and also on cubesats I respectfully disagree.

      The cubesat AAUSAT-IIthe we (the students at AAU AAU) are working on includes systems that are more advanced than many commercial satellites.

      The communication system utilizes a CAN-bus which is something NASA is still doing feasability studies on. The attitude determination and control system provides full three axis stabilisation and control using magnetorquers and momentum wheels for actuation and sunsensors, magnetometers and gyros for sensing. This is also a first, especially in a 10x10x10cm cube with a mass of 1 kg.
      The payload is a gamma ray burst detector from DSRI, danish space reasearch institute www.dsri.dk, which is being tested and spacequalified on this launch.

      I think you should try to figure out how you would put:
      EPS (Electrical Power System)
      - solar cells
      - batteries
      - power conditioning
      - power distribution

      COM
      - Antennas
      - Transmitter
      - Receiver
      - Modem

      ADCS (Attitude determination and control)
      - Sun sensors
      - Gyros
      - Magnetometer
      - Magnetorquers (coils)
      - Momentum wheels (motors + flywheels)
      - Various filtering, sensorfusion and control algorithms.

      OBC (On Board computer)
      - Microprocessor system
      - Command and data handling
      - Fault tolerance
      - Software upload (in orbit)

      Payload
      - Actual payload
      - + interfacing electronics

      Mechanical structure
      - Harness
      - Structure
      - Thermal analysis

      All fitted into a cubesat (10x10x10cm) max 1 kg.

      Ohh.. and when you're done, you have to space certify it all :-)

      Good luck

    8. Re:Design to construction in less than a year... by Stanistani · · Score: 1

      These satellites are not "simple" and some failures should be expected... see: NASA

    9. Re:Design to construction in less than a year... by goretexguy · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, that's to much information for Slashdot... actual content needs to be posted on a whimpy webserver...

    10. Re:Design to construction in less than a year... by mitchus · · Score: 1
      Welcome to the real world of engineering. Few projects of any value take less than five to ten years, it's not unique to space, but common to every engineering discipline.
      Please avoid the patronizing tone. And if you're implying that a space mission is "just another project", I have to respectfully disagree; I think there are few areas where fault-tolerance is so close to nil.
      Assuming that the commercial customer gives his OK for the weight and volume to be released, and is satisfied that the parasite poses no threat to his bird. It's not a simple process.
      I didn't say it was simple. It is however feasible with the kind of funding a student project like this can obtain, whereas a dedicated launch is clearly not.
    11. Re:Design to construction in less than a year... by mitchus · · Score: 1

      ESA is not actually being "nice" just for the philantropy of it. I know that they are having trouble recruiting young people because of the high level of commitment which the field requires. This kind of project creates contact with interested students who might otherwise not have approached the space agency.

  2. But will it crash in China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Inquiring governments want to know.

  3. Roland the Whammer by Stanistani · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Roland Piquepaille ? Isn't that the guy who posts summaries to drive traffic up to his website?

    1. Re:Roland the Whammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes it is. He just seems to troll around on science websites finding news and posting it to slashdot, including a lame link to his site which just posts the same crap I could get by reading the article. I've gotten pretty good.. I can pick out his articles before even noticing the author now.

    2. Re:Roland the Whammer by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's right. Notice how every single one of his stories has a link to the real article, and a traffic link to his website, plus another traffic link under his name.

      A lot of the stories are pretty interesting, which helps. But, wouldn't they be just as good without the traffic links? If he wants a link to his site, it's right there under his name already.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    3. Re:Roland the Whammer by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      Wait until he finds out that the sentence "Read this summary for more details" gives it away.

      Note that if he was less of a hypocrit, it would read "Read this summary for the same details but with lots of ads that make me rich."

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    4. Re:Roland the Whammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://radiocomments.userland.com/comments?u=10591 0&p=1001&link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F010 5910%2F2004%2F10%2F20.html%23a1001
      Spam his blog!

      That'll learn the motherfucker!

    5. Re:Roland the Whammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wait a sec...

      He gets rich of this damn scam?!!!

      I am such a chump, working for my money and all!

    6. Re:Roland the Whammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't understand why everybody cares so much if this guy's blog gets more traffic or not. What is so morally horrendous about linking back to your own site if it contains valid information on topics that Slashdot editors like to post about?

    7. Re:Roland the Whammer by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Roland Piquepaille ? Isn't that the guy who posts summaries to drive traffic up to his website?"

      Roland Piquepaille? Isn't that the guy people bitch about, even though bitching about it gives Slashdot more reason to keep him?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:Roland the Whammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he would do this to get traffic to his blog, then what's to stop him from eating babies?

    9. Re:Roland the Whammer by bleckywelcky · · Score: 4, Informative

      As well, he is a submission whore. So far this year, he has had 103 stories show up on SlashDot. So how many has he submitted? Let's say 1 out of every 4 gets accepted (at most). That's 412 submissions (at least) in the past 305 days. I wonder how much he makes off the advertising on his site and if it's a business I should try to get in on ...

    10. Re:Roland the Whammer by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      Shouldnt /. be recieving some sort of monetary compensation for providing him with advertising revenue by linking to his page?

      --
      SRSLY.
    11. Re:Roland the Whammer by Mannerism · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Roland Piquepaille? Isn't that the guy people bitch about, even though bitching about it gives Slashdot more reason to keep him?

      More reason to keep him? That should be easy enough to fix. Just make it your policy to mod down as overrated any comment posted to a Piquepaille story that's not a Piquepaille criticism, and encourage others to do the same. I suspect that that would make his submissions of much less value to Slashdot.

      Personally, I think the guy's abusing the system and that /.'s editors deserve a swift kick in the ass for not at least editing out the gratuitous links to the plagiar^H^H^H^H^H^H^H "summaries".

    12. Re:Roland the Whammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ball gag?

    13. Re:Roland the Whammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger got first post.

    14. Re:Roland the Whammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's Jon Katz.

  4. it looks like .. by r0b0t+b0y · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. a borg cube! it even has mini-cube satellites that make me think of decentralized systems (i know it's not, but that's what it makes me think of)

    --


    ----
    i do not use drugs, i AM drugs -- Dali
    1. Re:it looks like .. by K3lvin · · Score: 1

      . a borg cube! it even has mini-cube satellites that make me think of decentralized systems (i know it's not, but that's what it makes me think of)

      And it was even made by a collective of students!

  5. 2 more builds! by fembots · · Score: 1

    design to construction in less than a year

    Great, they can build 2 more

  6. What next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The first satellite has been automatically generated by the Internet. Pretty soon, the skies will be filled with satellites offering penis enlargement, Nigerian scams, and hot stock tips.

  7. Roland Piquepaille!!! by funny-jack · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Can we please have a Roland Piquepaille section so we can block stories submitted by this yahoo? Please?

    --
    You probably shouldn't click this.
    1. Re:Roland Piquepaille!!! by Da_Biz · · Score: 1

      Or, at the very least, make the link to his blog in text and not clickable?

    2. Re:Roland Piquepaille!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh great god of Slashdot.. please provide me with your goodness... an "ignore articles by that freaking Roland guy" link.. please...

    3. Re:Roland Piquepaille!!! by samberdoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't lame him, blame the guys that continue to post his stories. I have had several posts rejected only to show up the next day from someone else, including this guy.

  8. Wow by Moby+Cock · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is very impressive. The level of detail required on such a complex project is often daunting. To acheive a design with team members so far flung is nothing short of incredibe. I am not entirely sure what to make of it. It's a little like Linus' idea of "many eyeballs". Except in this case its not finding bugs its bulding satellites.

    Imagine an extention of this work being used to solve problems and develop workarounds for breakage on the ISS or (dare I say it....) Mars.

    This is really very cool.

    1. Re:Wow by marvinalone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dare you say mars? We all say mars, all the time. That's why no one takes us serious.

  9. Childe Roland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Childe Roland to the dork tower came...

    1. Re:Childe Roland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first thought was, he lied in every word.

      OK, let's leave Dubya out of this...

  10. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    im so sick of this guy. i'd rather have Katz back. maybe.

  11. why can't we do it? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Funny

    with the collective thinking power of slashdot, I'm sure we could achieve something equivalent, or better.

    imagine a large, spherical grey satellite...

    any post made by the trolls against this satellite would be a useless gesture, no matter what technical data they have obtained. This satellite would be the ultimate power in LEO!

    trolls: That's no communications satellite. It's a slashdotting station!

    1. Re:why can't we do it? by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      Somehow, someway, it will be related to goatse or the GNAA. "The new GNAA orbital induction station is now operational!" Especially if it looks like a great sphere or pair of spheres in orbit. *cough*

      --
      SRSLY.
  12. Whee fuck Piqy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Students Design a Satellite via Internet

    A group of 250 students from many European universities has collectively designed a satellite by using a dedicated news server and weekly chats on Internet. By using the Web, the virtual team was able to move from design to construction in less than a year. The SSETI Express is currently under integration in one of the technology centers of the European Space Agency (ESA) in the Netherlands. Only a few selected members of the team will attend the launch which will be part of the Russian mission Cosmos DMC-3 in May 2005. The SSETI Express will embark three mini 'cubesats' for specific experiments while the main satellite will test a propulsion system and act as a transponder for amateur radio users. I sure hope that this collaborative action will be successful. Read more...

    Here is what ESA says about this collective work over Internet.

    Scattered in universities across Europe, a 250-strong team of students have never collectively met in person, but between them they have built a space-ready satellite.

    Collaboration between the pan-European network of students, universities and experts involved in the Student Space Education and Technology Initiative (SSETI) has been carried out via the internet.

    Now that the completed subsystems are being delivered to ESA's European Space Technology Centre (ESTEC) in the Netherlands, remote participants from Italy to Denmark are eagerly following the integration process through daily photo updates, the integration logbook, and even a webcam.

    What is the mission of this satellite?

    Like a Russian doll, SSETI Express will carry inside it three smaller 'cubesats' -- 10-centimetre cube technology testers built respectively by universities in Germany, Japan and Norway -- for deployment when in orbit. The main SSETI Express satellite itself will test and characterise a propulsion system, return images of the Earth and serve as a transponder for amateur radio users.

    The future SSETI Express satellite Here is a drawing of the future SSETI Express satellite. (Credit: ESA) It measures only 60 by 60 by 70 centimeters and is part of the Russian mission Cosmos DMC-3. If everything goes fine, it will be launched in May 2005.

    The SSETI team is already working on another satellite, the European Student Earth Orbiter (ESEO). This one will be more complex than Express, weigh 100 kilograms, and it will be launched by an Ariane 5 rocket in 2007.

    Besides these two satellites, the ESA looks at the future.

    Coordination between groups is carried out using a dedicated news server and weekly Internet Relay Chats (IRCs) as well as the SSETI website. Face-to-face meetings are the exception rather than the rule, with group representatives meeting every six months for a workshop at ESTEC.

    Beyond Express and ESEO, SSETI has hopes of becoming a fully-fledged facilitation network for all student space activity, with members carrying out detailed feasibility studies for a European Student Moon Orbiter (ESMO) a European Student Moon Rover (ESMR) and even an orbiter for Mars.

    And here is the conclusion of Philippe Willekens of the ESA Education Department.

    "This unique opportunity for students is also a unique opportunity for ESA to see how the young generation is working through a wide internet-distributed system, with little resources, but great enthusiasm and energy."

    Good luck to all!

    Source: European Space Agency news release, October 19, 2004

  13. Obviously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    this could be used by terrorists to spy on God-fearing American citizens. Ban it! Ban it, I say!

    1. Re:Obviously.. by tool462 · · Score: 1

      So if it floats, it's made of...
      Wood!
      Right! And therefore...
      A Satellite!
      Burn it! Burn it!

  14. In other news by masouds · · Score: 1, Redundant

    In other news, GNU/Linux still remains the biggest projects ever collaborated on the internet.

    --
    This .sig was intentionaly left blank.
  15. MOD PARENT DOWN! by wpmegee · · Score: 0

    Link to goatse!

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ON Topic, BITCH!

  16. amsat by Mr2cents · · Score: 4, Informative

    Aha, an other HAM satellite! Don't forget HAMs will be able to recieve data from Mars if this mission succeeds. (ok, at 5 baud or so, but an interesting project nonetheless, and a reason for me to get a license.

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    1. Re:amsat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Well, let's see..


      • Yep, amateur sateliites are very, very cool. Half a dozen in orbit working right now, a dozen more coming the next five years or so.
      • Most of the ones up right now are workable with about $US 1K worth of equipment, some for less, some for a *lot* less.
      • And with that said, to hear P5A (the one going to Mars) you're going to need a surplus 5+ meter dish (starts at about a ton), a two-axis mount with positioners accurate to much less than a tenth of a degree, and a very, very high performance microwave receiver.


      While a large fraction of the radio astronomy community are hams, very few hams actually work in radio astronomy (or for JPL's Deep Space Network). So don't go thinking you're going to hear P5A unless you always wear wind up watches because quartz ones are banned at work. :-)

    2. Re:amsat by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I might be mistaken, but you don't need a license to listen, do you? I thought you only needed a license to transmit...

      Not that I'm doing either without a license, mind you. (I wouldn't have the time.)

    3. Re:amsat by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      Indeed, you don't, but I have to learn how, so.. Sorry for the confusion.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    4. Re:amsat by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      > While a large fraction of the radio astronomy community are hams,

      This goes a long way towards explaining why SETI hasn't found anything besides cloves and pineapple.

    5. Re:amsat by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      Here is a pdf file discussing the requirements, hopefully new computer processing techniques will lighten the job, although I'm aware it won't be easy. I might have to join up with a local club. Nevertheless I believe that new techniques will be searched for to ease the receiving requirements. During the last years, low-power transmitting is a real hype, people are making connections around the globe with milliwatts(!!) of transmitting power.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    6. Re:amsat by hplasm · · Score: 0

      Well, with the onset of IP over AC (power), satcoms will be all that's left for Ham traffic..

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  17. Maybe Im too new, maybe just dense by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    BUT WHO IS THIS Roland Piquepaille, AND WHY IS HE DISLIKED ?

    1. Re:Maybe Im too new, maybe just dense by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      why is he disliked ?

      This is why.

    2. Re:Maybe Im too new, maybe just dense by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

      "WHO IS THIS Roland Piquepaille, AND WHY IS HE DISLIKED ?"

      He gets story after story posted here, just to drive traffic to his crappy slashdot-wanna-be blog, and he probably gets ad revenue from it.

      Maybe if his site was a little less fringe-lunatic junk science he wouldn't be so reviled.

      I personally think he has some deal with the slashdot editors to get his stories posted because _nobody_ else has the story acceptance record this guy does. Nobody is anywhere close.

    3. Re:Maybe Im too new, maybe just dense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except michael.

    4. Re:Maybe Im too new, maybe just dense by Trigun · · Score: 1

      And his previous Slashdot ID, rpiquepa is the second most prolific submitter, with 179 articles submitted.

      Douchebaggery at its finest.

  18. I like this... by apostrophesemicolon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it seems like more and more people are taking things into their own hands, bypassing the government agencies' bureaucratic process that goes for ages..

    we've seen the SpaceShipOne made it, and now a 'brute force' construction of a satellite.. this only leads to the question: what's next?? LEZ DO DIS!

    -A simple hydrogen-powered car model that's ready to be mass produced? (instead of stuck being a prototype)
    -better next-gen ASIMOs?
    -advanced propulsion technology?
    -human habitat for mars?

    sheez, when I thnk about how people can combine their power and time to bruteforce-building something.. almost nothing is impossible
    as for me, im still working on my warp machine :p

    1. Re:I like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was an ESA initiative though, so it's not really bypassing government agencies', it's just giving them free workforce...

    2. Re:I like this... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Informative

      Amateur radio operators worldwide have been doing this for 43 years!

      From AMSAT:

      The Radio Amateur Satellite Corporation (as AMSAT is officially known) was first formed in the District of Columbia in 1969 as an educational organization. Its goal was to foster Amateur Radio's participation in space research and communication. AMSAT was founded to continue the efforts, begun in 1961 [emphasis added], by Project OSCAR, a west coast USA-based group which built and launched the very first Amateur Radio satellite, OSCAR, on December 12, 1961, barely four years after the launch of Russia's first Sputnik.
      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    3. Re:I like this... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      it seems like more and more people are taking things into their own hands, bypassing the government agencies' bureaucratic process that goes for ages..
      You might try reading the article and noting that this bird was in fact sponsored by a bureaucratic agency and paid for with said agencies funds.
      we've seen the SpaceShipOne made it, and now a 'brute force' construction of a satellite.. this only leads to the question: what's next??
      We've seen Rutan build what amounts to an extreme amusement park ride, and some students build what amounts to a complex science fair experiment, (and nothing brute force about it)... Move along folks, nothing new to see here.
  19. Boycott Roland Piquespam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Attention Editors: Roland is a cash-for-linkage spammer who uses each Slashdotting you award him to rake in a mint in Google adwords.

    Attention Slashdotters: Join the fight against Roland by mirroring his content and not clicking through.

    Roland "writes":
    Students Design a Satellite via Internet

    A group of 250 students from many European universities has collectively designed a satellite by using a dedicated news server and weekly chats on Internet. By using the Web, the virtual team was able to move from design to construction in less than a year. The SSETI Express is currently under integration in one of the technology centers of the European Space Agency (ESA) in the Netherlands. Only a few selected members of the team will attend the launch which will be part of the Russian mission Cosmos DMC-3 in May 2005. The SSETI Express will embark three mini 'cubesats' for specific experiments whilethe main satellitewill test a propulsion system and act as a transponder for amateur radio users. I sure hope that this collaborative action will be successful. Read more...

    Here is what ESA says about this collective work over Internet.

    Scattered in universities across Europe, a 250-strong team of students have never collectively met in person, but between them they have built a space-ready satellite.
    Collaboration between the pan-European network of students, universities and experts involved in the Student Space Education and Technology Initiative (SSETI) has been carried out via the internet.
    Now that the completed subsystems are being delivered to ESA's European Space Technology Centre ( ESTEC ) in the Netherlands, remote participants from Italy to Denmark are eagerly following the integration process through daily photo updates, the integration logbook, and even a webcam.

    What is the mission of this satellite?

    Like a Russian doll, SSETI Express will carry inside it three smaller 'cubesats' -- 10-centimetre cube technology testers built respectively by universities in Germany, Japan and Norway -- for deployment when in orbit. The main SSETI Express satellite itself will test and characterise a propulsion system, return images of the Earth and serve as a transponder for amateur radio users.
    Here is a drawing of the future SSETI Express satellite. (Credit: ESA) It measures only 60 by 60 by 70 centimeters and is part of the Russian mission Cosmos DMC-3. If everything goes fine, it will be launched in May 2005.

    The SSETI team is already working on another satellite, the European Student Earth Orbiter (ESEO). This one will be more complex than Express, weigh 100 kilograms, and it will be launched by an Ariane 5 rocket in 2007.

    Besides these two satellites, the ESA looks at the future.

    Coordination between groups is carried out using a dedicated news server and weekly Internet Relay Chats (IRCs) as well as the SSETI website. Face-to-face meetings are the exception rather than the rule, with group representatives meeting every six months for a workshop at ESTEC.
    Beyond Express and ESEO, SSETI has hopes of becoming a fully-fledged facilitation network for all student space activity, with members carrying out detailed feasibility studies for a European Student Moon Orbiter (ESMO) a European Student Moon Rover (ESMR) and even an orbiter for Mars.

    And here is the conclusion of Philippe Willekens of the ESA Education Department.

    "This unique opportunity for students is also a unique opportunity for ESA to see how the young generation is working through a wide internet-distributed system, with little resources, but great enthusiasm and energy."

    Good luck to all!

    Source: European Space Agency news release, October 19, 2004


    1. Re:Boycott Roland Piquespam by fritter · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wait, we're having a hard time getting Slashdotters to not read the article? Did I miss something?

    2. Re:Boycott Roland Piquespam by IcyHando'Death · · Score: 1


      Oh, bloody hell! Not another Slag Rolland Festival!

      Why do people get so worked up about this? Yes, we know he hopes to divert traffic to his site and yes his summaries are of dubious value compared to the genuine article. But for god's sake, how is it hurting anyone? Nobody can deny that the stories he brings to /. are consistently interesting and add to this site as well as his own. Do you feel you've wasted a slice of your precious band-width? Get over it!

    3. Re:Boycott Roland Piquespam by isorox · · Score: 1

      Attention Slashdotters: Join the fight against Roland by mirroring his content and not clicking through.

      Mirroring? You mean copying it? Imagine if everyone was so blasé about copyright - bye bye GPL for starters. Dont like his work? Dont read it, write your own instead.

    4. Re:Boycott Roland Piquespam by mindriot · · Score: 1

      Remember, there is a difference between clicking on an article link and then actually reading the article. I'm sure everyone clicks the link... it's just that 90% of slashdotters hit the back button about 2 nanoseconds later. :)

  20. My satellite by r2q2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well I built my satellite out of an TI-89 calculator and some metal boxes. I programmed it myself and launched it using my model rocket. So there.

    --
    My UID is prime is yours?
    1. Re:My satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you got it into orbit using a model rocket? Impressive....

    2. Re:My satellite by phoenix.bam! · · Score: 1

      he never said it reached orbit.

    3. Re:My satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then according to my dictionary it isnt a satellite.

  21. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Satellite launches YOU!

  22. Space monopolies are bad by James+McP · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I read an article recently (http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~53~24 79286,00.html) that NASA can't get rid of Lockheed despite the cockups with Genesis, Mars Climate observer and Mars Polar Observer because Lockheed has too many of the people with experience. The only way to avoid this is to get more people in the loop.

    NASA has a program where high schoolers can put together an experiment to be run in the pressurized portion of the shuttle, which is great, but doesn't compare to the fact that there are now three colleges that have experience building orbital devices and an untold number of individuals who were involved in the collaboration. If the ESA keeps this up we might see several european aerospace companies form in the next decade.

    Look out Lockheed.

    --
    I've been on slashdot so long I'm starting to get out of touch with the cool stuff if it ain't on slashdot.
    1. Re:Space monopolies are bad by johannesg · · Score: 3, Informative
      If the ESA keeps this up we might see several european aerospace companies form in the next decade.

      Yeah, like there are none already...

    2. Re:Space monopolies are bad by James+McP · · Score: 1

      I left out the word "new" in that sentence, didn't I? Obviously there are several european space corporations out there, just to service the communication industry if nothing else.

      Since the "new" is implicit in "form" my point remains.

      --
      I've been on slashdot so long I'm starting to get out of touch with the cool stuff if it ain't on slashdot.
    3. Re:Space monopolies are bad by bleckywelcky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      lmao. There's a difference between some dinky 80 kg 2' x 2' x 2' cube designed to be launched into SSO at 668km and a ~9000 kg beast designed to propel itself out of HEO and into an orbit around the icy moons of Jupiter to study their formation and composition with a vast instrument suite.

      I'm not knocking their efforts, and I admire the work they have done; but this team of students has only designed a small, light satellite that performs a couple of on-board experiments and relays the information back to Earth. There is practically 0 innovation in this project because everything they use is COTS technology. The only innovative part will be the data collected from the experiment, but even the experiment uses COTS technology.

      I'm as ticked off about the crap that Lockheed (and others) have failed on, but they're nowhere near being replaced in the next decade.

    4. Re:Space monopolies are bad by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      baby steps are all it takes. In twenty years we'll have... something cool.

      --
      SRSLY.
    5. Re:Space monopolies are bad by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      I read an article recently (http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~53~24 79286,00.html) that NASA can't get rid of Lockheed despite the cockups with Genesis, Mars Climate observer and Mars Polar Observer because Lockheed has too many of the people with experience. The only way to avoid this is to get more people in the loop.

      NASA has a program where high schoolers can put together an experiment to be run in the pressurized portion of the shuttle, which is great, but doesn't compare to the fact that there are now three colleges that have experience building orbital devices and an untold number of individuals who were involved in the collaboration.

      ROTFL.

      The difference between this bird (SSETI) and the ones LockMart builds is roughly the same leap as between a hobbyist Z-80/S-100 kit and a Cray minframe.
    6. Re:Space monopolies are bad by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
      The current incarnation of the NASA/AFRL sponsored University Nanosat competition, which recently completed its Critical Design Review, has 12 or 13 universities involved. This is the 3rd time around for the program. Previous incarnations produced satellites from Stanford, Arizona State, CU Boulder, and New Mexico State, and several other schools. Plus the Cubesat program is letting even high-schools get involved in building small but functional satellites.

      Having said all that, what Lockheed really needs to look out for is Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd in the UK. They started as a university program about 20 years ago, but they're now a full-fledged company that is well-known for innovative designs and cost-cutting measures. They have launched about 25 satellites so far, have the contract for the Galileo constellation prototypes, and are pushing into the US market (they've already done several projects for the USAF). Definitely a company to keep an eye on.

    7. Re:Space monopolies are bad by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
      I'm as ticked off about the crap that Lockheed (and others) have failed on, but they're nowhere near being replaced in the next decade.

      You may want to take a look at Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd before you make that assertion. SSTL has loads of experience, a knack for keeping costs low, and a reputation for innovation. They are already trying to move out of the pure smallsat market, and are also making a push into the US market.

    8. Re:Space monopolies are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      NASA can't get rid of Lockheed despite the cockups [...] because Lockheed has too many of the people with experience.


      Yeah, where else can NASA find that much experience with destroying space probes?
    9. Re:Space monopolies are bad by sjames · · Score: 1

      The difference between this bird (SSETI) and the ones LockMart builds is roughly the same leap as between a hobbyist Z-80/S-100 kit and a Cray minframe.

      History may not repeat itself, but it rhymes (Twain)

      They have to start somewhere. Those little Z-80, 8008, etc hobby computers didn't look like much to the mainframe and mini people in their day, but they are the direct predecessors of the machine I'm typing this on, the machine you're reading this on, and the /. servers themselves.

      Mainframes and minis aren't exactly dead, but they went from accounting for 100% of the world's computation to a tiny fraction of it.

      Well before the PC, a lot of people got into computing by building and using those tiny hobby systems. They're the ones that tend to keep their jobs during the periodic jobs crunches in IT. They're also the ones who stood ready to make the PC take off like it did once it's time came. The original PC bore a lot of resemblance to the hobby systems. The Apple ][ even more so.

    10. Re:Space monopolies are bad by johannesg · · Score: 1
      Hmm, two posts in a row about SSTL. You wouldn't happen to work there would you? ;-)

    11. Re:Space monopolies are bad by GileadGreene · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately not :( I don't particularly want to live in Guildford. But I admire their work a lot, mostly because they've done a lot of things that I think should have been done a long time ago. And having worked in the space industry in the US I am very well aware of just how scared of SSTL some of the folks there are.

  23. Build your own by clockmaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    courtesy of Pumpkin, Inc. (makers of the Salvo RTOS)

    http://www.cubesatkit.com/

  24. SETI is for bigger geeks that me. by Uptown+Joe · · Score: 1

    - but I did install the screensaver once..

  25. Duh by ktheory · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that all these years, satellite designers have NOT been using the internet?

  26. I for one welcome our new satellite ... by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Funny

    overlords, but I ask what they hope to achieve by spying on us? I am the only one with any important data, and I keep it all in my head. I recently constructed a new piece of security headgear, the plans for which I will make Open Source after my death. Let's just say they don't even know I'm here when I'm wearing it, like right now (so they won't know I'm typing this).

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:I for one welcome our new satellite ... by isorox · · Score: 1

      Let's just say they don't even know I'm here when I'm wearing it, like right now (so they won't know I'm typing this).

      Your headgear is no match for my faraday cage annihilator. Your typing it from 127.0.0.1

  27. Next step: Rocket by cbx_cbx · · Score: 0

    Those guys , or perhaps another group using the same method, could form a reusable http://www.v2rocket.com/V2-like rocket laucher team to put this sattelite into orbit. That way, the full process (Sat/Rocket/Orbit) would be complete, not depending of the Russian/others to put it into orbit...

  28. AHHHH, I see by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    Hey i subscribe to a few good mags, maybe I can make a Buck
    • Sir Tim Berners-LEE
    • He created the Web. Now he's making Internet 2.0

    Just kidding. If there is a way to an easy $, it will be figured out. That is the nature of the universe.

  29. US has similar program by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I recall (was it slashdot?) that a university consortia launches mini-sats in the US. A mini-sat must fit inside a 10 cm (4 inch) edge cube and weigh no more than two kilos (4.4 lbs). The launch fee is $25K.

    1. Re:US has similar program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a 10*10*10 cm cube yes, but the weight is only 1 kg. These satellites are not only built in the states but all around the world.

  30. The satellite story is impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work at a lab where we build comm sats for the govmnt and what these kids did has been done before [US radio amateurs put up the "echo" [sp?] sat last summer for instance] but not by so many, and not so inexpensively.

    But where is the disclaimer that the notorious Roland is either under the OSTG umbrella or kicking back ad revenues under the table to /.?

    or maybe some of us are jealous our sumissions get roundfiled a lot more often than not?

  31. I sure hope... by GillBates0 · · Score: 1

    they send Roland Piquepaille up on their satellite. I'm sure they'll find him a big asset to the mission.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  32. Practical Application by DigitalRaptor · · Score: 3, Funny

    In a more "everyday" application, Martha Stewart is using the same collaboration techniques to connect 118 prisoners from 13 women's prisons to perfect her recipe for beef stroganoff...

    --
    Lose Weight and Feel Great with Isagenix
  33. The real story is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fp!

  34. Please, more clue. by jemfinch · · Score: 3, Interesting
    A group of 250 students from many European universities has collectively designed a satellite by using a dedicated news server and weekly chats on Internet. By using the Web, the virtual team was able to move from design to construction in less than a year.


    Last I checked, "the web" didn't include NNTP. Surely Slashdot is above the uneducated synonymity between the internet and "the Web."

    Jeremy
    1. Re:Please, more clue. by KingNaught · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked there are lots of "Web" based news servers out there.

    2. Re:Please, more clue. by arose · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that "the Web" is the the World Wide Web?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    3. Re:Please, more clue. by Mannerism · · Score: 1

      Surely Slashdot is above the uneducated synonymity between the internet and "the Web."

      We're not above it, and don't call us Shirley.

    4. Re:Please, more clue. by isorox · · Score: 1

      Maybe they used a web interface to access

  35. Ha! by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's nothing. A group of scientists invented the Internet without using the Internet.

  36. Re:Roland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do know that goatse.cx has been suspended by the .cx people, and that your posted link is harmless, right?

  37. The amazing this is... by The+I+Shing · · Score: 1

    The amazing thing is that they all did it from their parents' basements.

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:The amazing this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually we built our subsystem in a small lab at the university...But ok, it sorta looks like a basement...
      Well, Cant spend more time posting. We are sending the subsystem to ESA for final integration tomorrow and its getting kinda late.

  38. You're an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NNTP is not in any way part of, the same as, or synonymous to the WWW. There may be web interfaces to NTTP but that does not make NNTP part of the WWW.

    1. Re:You're an idiot by KingNaught · · Score: 1

      Your the idiot, nowhere in the article does it say anything about the NNTP protocol. There are plenty of browser based news severs out there, and most of them are not front ends to a NNTP server (http://groups.google.com/ for instance). Just becuase they don't use the NNTP protocol doesn't meen there not news servers. If I use your logic webmail isn't realy email becuase you don't access using a POP3 client, Hotmail and its like do not use the POP3 protocol to retrieve or display your mail but there still email clients.

  39. Them socialists sure is lagging behind America by Cryofan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everytime any sort of comparison comes up with respect to America versus Europe, all I hear from ordinary Americans or the political right is that European countries are on their asses and that America is the greatest country in the world, yadda yadda. I mean, after all, considering how "socialist" Europe is (at least according to the Right and most ordinary Americans), we are of course beating the pants off them at science, commerce, and of course economically.

    Of course from time to time cruel reality intrudes upon that collective delusion. Like right now....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:Them socialists sure is lagging behind America by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Everytime any sort of comparison comes up with respect to America versus Europe, all I hear from ordinary Americans or the political right is that European countries are on their asses and that America is the greatest country in the world, yadda yadda. I mean, after all, considering how "socialist" Europe is (at least according to the Right and most ordinary Americans), we are of course beating the pants off them at science, commerce, and of course economically.

      Of course from time to time cruel reality intrudes upon that collective delusion. Like right now....

      Hmm... American hams, with no help from the goverment, have been launching smallsats of various descriptions for nearly forty years. (A total of 10-12 or so with 5 more in the works.)

      One European student team with massive support, assistance, and infrastructure provided by the goverment launches a single sat.

      You do the math.
  40. Timothy: Stop Accepting Roland's Articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If his shameless for-profit blog is not going convince you to reject his stuff, then surely the scandal regarding the non-existant "Tactile Digital Assitant" and the money they scammed out of poeple will?

    If Slashdot cannot get some ethics soon, this place will become a spectacle.

  41. I especially dig the... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    ...One-Click launch. Is it patented?

  42. Wow! Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And here I thought the internet's use as a communications tool had become so commonplace that a story about some people using to communicate couldn't possibly be news worthy.

    I guess small things just continue to fascinate some people forever.

    1. Re:Wow! Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess if you were involved in this project as I am you wouldn't call it a small thing...
      Just because you can post a response on a newsgroup doesn't mean you can discuss things proberly.

      small things my ass.....respectfully :)

  43. Interesting Story... by CaptainTux · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I think that, more than anything, this project shows two things: 1) that national (or even international) borders do not hinder great minds collectively working as though side by side, and 2) that the private and academic sectors will be where the future of defense, communications, etc will come from and not the government.

    I'm particularly excited about the success of this project because it ties into a project that I've been researching for a few weeks now but thought was impossible. Basically, it's using temporary subdermal GPS technology coupled with sats to enable the easy location and rescue of those who go missing in a hot zone (with my current focus being on Iraq/Afghanistan). Until today when I read this article, I was convinced that this would never see the light of day because -- even though I understood what needed to be done and could probably assemble a good group of people to do it -- I would run into government hurdle after government hurdle and the costs would simply be too high to do it privately. After reading this story though, I realize that isn't true and am quite excited about seriously pursuing this project! Now, to recruit, research, build and deploy.

    I know there are people here who poo-poo this as something "already" done by the ham folks. But I believe that there is something substantially different about this success. On one hand, I think that we're going to see a lot of positives come from this. On the other hand I think there will be some negatives as governments start to realize that they no longer hold the monopoly on "gee-whiz" technology simply because they employ top scientists. They will be forced to sit up and take notice of private projects now and that could be a double edged sword. I suppose we'll have to wait and see.

    --
    Anthony Papillion
    Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
    "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
  44. designed a satellite by using a .. news server by rjshields · · Score: 1

    Wow, that's some feat of engineering. And I thought the A-Team were ingenious!

    --
    In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
  45. Thats great but... by k31bang · · Score: 1

    ...I'd rather see those same 250 students put together the ultimate CGI pr0no via the internet. Oh wait, no i don't.

    --
    -+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ *** http://www.mountainfort.com *** +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-
  46. bureaucracy and collaboration by bbc · · Score: 1

    Amateur satellites are of course nothing new, but it is great to see a bureaucracy like ESA more or less embrace the sort of chaotic collaboration that is one of the internet's strong points.

  47. Ncube finally goes up by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1

    This satellite contains a container to dispense three even smaller (10x10x10cm, 1kg) microsatellites while in orbit. Here is one of them designed by students in Norway. Hey, some students from my department have been designing the communication subsystem for it. Good the launch has finally been arranged (NCUBE should have lifted off already according to the plans). If I recall correctly, one of the missions of the Norwegian microsatellite is to count reindeed (with little transponders) in Northern Norway, then dump the data back to the communication station on Earth. They are also putting a camera on it.

    --
    17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
  48. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  49. Only one step by twostar · · Score: 1

    While I don't want to rain on their parade, this is only a single step in the process of building a flight ready bird. Doing it purely through the net is pretty impressive though.

    But, in my experience building a CubeSat, it was the time from final "design" to flight ready status that went over time and over budget on every level. If they expect to have a flight model ready in less then a year they're dreaming, even if this was at one location with the team all centered and working together that's going to be pushing it. I can't even imagine trying to get the actual hardware working in a distributed environment like that. It was practically required to work in the same room as the other teams because of the level of systems integration. A single change in one area affected the rest of the subsystems. Or a simple question may take you through three other people and being able to just walk over and ask them the question was a hell of alot faster then emailing and waiting for a response.

    Then there are the problems that come up with "final" hardware delivery. I've seen at least three revisions of each "flight" part, each one promising to be ready to fly right up until a test goes bad and we have to fix something.

    Regardless to the challenges ahead, good job and good luck. It's always nice to see universities proving they can build faster, better, and cheaper then the big companies and doing what the "experts" say is impossible.

  50. ontopic: here's HOW they collaborated by majid_aldo · · Score: 1

    i wish i could find more detail than this

    http://216.239.41.104/search?q=cache:Z32wRgndSjYJ: www.estec.esa.nl/outreach/sseti/Textfiles/sseti.pd f+SSETI+internet+collaboration&hl=en
    4.2 Data/Design structure
    During the design and building of the spacecraft, participants of SSETI will be located all over Europe. Thisresults in a very unconventional, new communication approach, which is called distributed development.The main characteristic of this approach is that modern communication tools (Internet, e-mail etc.) will beused to discuss and communicate with each other. A study has already started to establish thiscommunication network. This study also includes a large database with information about the Europeancapabilities of building micro-satellites.The structure of the data collection will take place in a similar way as used by the Concurrent DesignFacility (CDF) at ESTEC. All data, which is relevant for other users, will be stored in EXCEL workbooks.There will be 1 workbook for every subsystem, which will be accessible for all users. The interactionbetween the workbooks will take place via the Data-Exchange file. The only person authorised to change(update) this file is the Data co-ordinator.The official interaction between the teams will take place during sessions, which will take place each monthor every 14 days. During these sessions the changes in the system data will be discussed. These sessionsare the only opportunity to change data, which will have an effect on other sub-systems. Requests aremade by the universities to put topics on the agenda. The informal communication will be held with the helpof bulletin boards (Micro-sat study) and simple e-mail (mailing lists).

    --
    --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
    1. Re:ontopic: here's HOW they collaborated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this was the first proposal since 2000.
      Since then we have changed a lot.

      Joerg,
      SSETI Infrastructures

  51. oxymoron by majid_aldo · · Score: 1

    Read this summary for more details

    --
    --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
  52. Wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not an Amateur Radio satellite, it simply has an amateur radio payload. The important point is not the ham stuff, it is the method (highly distributed) and the education value that counts... (all done by students)