Slashdot Mirror


New Inventions Featured at the BIS

kjh1 writes "BBC News is running an article covering the British Invention Show (BIS) and some of the (quite useful) inventions that will be on display there this year."

79 comments

  1. Too bad many of them aren't new or novel... by bergeron76 · · Score: 3, Informative

    For example, "The Keyed Chain" was invented about 15 years ago here in the US. I know because I had one in my parents home when I grew up (they still have it). You reach your arm in the door with the key and unlock (and release) the chain.

    I'm not trying to be cynical here, I'm just pointing it out.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    1. Re:Too bad many of them aren't new or novel... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      This one works from outside.

      --
      Deleted
    2. Re:Too bad many of them aren't new or novel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! Now I get it!!

    3. Re:Too bad many of them aren't new or novel... by Syre · · Score: 5, Funny

      > This one works from outside.

      And it goes to 11.

    4. Re:Too bad many of them aren't new or novel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      WTF didn't you understand?

      You reach your arm in the door with the key and unlock (and release) the chain.

      I have the same lock and yes you can open it from the outside. WOW! These have been around FOR YEARS!

    5. Re:Too bad many of them aren't new or novel... by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      Amusingly that's how I feel about many of the 'inventions' that come from the US.

    6. Re:Too bad many of them aren't new or novel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have seen every single one of these invetions, other than the radiator bleeder, already. That flood protecotor? Have one at my inlaws house. Mouse trap? Already a near standard item in Taiwan (just go to some parts of Taiwan, you'll see why). This is total bullshit.

  2. Um ok.. by AltGrendel · · Score: 1, Funny
    I thought the headline read "New inventions feared at BIS"

    Here I was wondering what the RIAA was up to now.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

  3. Hmm by The+Islamic+Fundamen · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Having been to e3 and CIS(or whatever its called), im thinking of one day going to the BIS. Is it worth it? What do you the /.ers think?

    --
    Call me and my voicemail! 914-713-6795. (wow, I have the balls to post my voip number on /.)
    1. Re:Hmm by erick99 · · Score: 1

      After googling the show and reading several articles, I would go if time & funds allowed. It sounds like it would be instructive and a lot of fun.

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
  4. I've got it by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...all patented. For $699 I'll tell you which patents.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:I've got it by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have discovered a truly remarkable invention which this comment is too small to contain.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  5. sigh... by niteice · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why can't people offer an HTML version fo their PDF/.doc documents? Really it's not too hard to click "Save as web page" instead of "Save".

    --
    ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
    1. Re:sigh... by Zen+Punk · · Score: 1

      I concur. For crying out loud, the FAQ is an important part of any web site! There's a reason they call HTML the standard, you know. And here I thought the U.S. was the land of Microsoft.

      --
      Sleep is futile.
    2. Re:sigh... by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think its a matter of it being too hard to offer them as HTML. Some documents look like crap in html format. Particularly documents with complex mathematical expressions. Besides, what is wrong with PDF? There are plenty of non-Adobe PDF viewers out there if you don't want to patronize Adobe.

    3. Re:sigh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Besides, what is wrong with PDF?"

      Probably the worst thing is that *everyone* uses multi-column layouts for PDFs.

      Any idea | annoying to
      why this | read on a
      might be | computer?

      PDFs are always worse at displaying text than HTML. You get the choice between using a tiny unreadable font, or displaying only a tiny part of each page.

      Yes, I use 1600x1200 resolution on a 21" monitor, and PDFs are still uncomfortable to read at any zoom level.

      Everything on your computer, from the scrollbars to your mousewheel, are designed to handle long vertical documents. Not pissing about with going back up to the top of each page and across to the next column. You can read the whole of a slashdot page just by pressing down-arrow. Do that with PDF, and you'll be needing all 4 cursor-keys, plus the page up/page down keys, plus you have to keep track of what column you're in and where you are on the page.

      It's not part of the browser. Opening a window in the browser's client area doesn't count.
      - No links
      - No tabs
      - No bookmarks
      - No image-blocking
      - No find-as-you-type
      - No font-size tools
      - No "page info" tools
      - No back button

      Please wait while the PDF viewer loads.
      - About 3 seconds for XPDF
      - About 15 (yes, 15) seconds for Adobe reader (and that's my very latest, fastest computer at work)

      How many times have you downloaded a 3MB PDF to find 20KB of text in it, with a background image that takes all the bandwidth? Or some company reports, where you just want a table of data (30KB), and they bulk it up to a 20MB download with pictures of smiling children. With a proper web-based technology like HTML, these problems disappear - images and backgrounds load after the text, if at all.

      In fact, I can't think of any good reason to use PDF on the web at all. It's useful for previeing LaTeX documents before you print them, but for anything that you want to read on-screen, it's awful.

  6. A fun entry? by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    "It's a fun entry," says Professor Wolff of Daniel Doheny's Mousemaster, a trap able to hold "12 to 15 mice in one go".

    Call me old-fashioned, but how exactly cruelty towards animals can be considered fun?

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:A fun entry? by erick99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It was designed for farms and businesses that have a big problem with mice. I'd rather catch them in a bucket and drive them out and put them in the woods then break limbs in a more traditional trap. For many of these farms and businesses, leaving the mice running free is not an option. This seems like a very humane trap.

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
    2. Re:A fun entry? by DogsBollocks · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's fun because if you leave them all in the bucket long enough, they will eat each other.. :-)

    3. Re:A fun entry? by erick99 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Oh, gosh, I forgot to sign my post correctly, as the orginal poster did...

      Erick R Williams, M.A., M.S.

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
    4. Re:A fun entry? by Open_The_Box · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let's be honest, it's not exactly cruel compared to old style mousetraps that snap the little blighters backs now is it?

      Hmmn... if you want to make it cruel AND make it fun... exchange the bucket for the feeding mechanism of a tennis ball launcher! Now that's cruel. AND fun!

      *squeek* *squeek* nibble nibb.. slide scrabble pause... Thwump! Wheee!

      Might not be fun for the mouse but install enough of them on your farm and the fields will be alive with the sight of airbourne rodents this summer!!! ...I'm a bad bad person. ^_^

      --
      If you can't think of something nice to say then don't say anything at all. No, REALLY.
    5. Re:A fun entry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you say, "I'm too sexy for my cat," in Latin?

    6. Re:A fun entry? by fossa · · Score: 2, Funny

      leaving the mice running free is not an option

      How 'bout lettin' em run, just not free. Hook the little guys up to a generator or something :-)

      Or how about a few cats...

    7. Re:A fun entry? by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey! Don't be giving those bankrupt US airlines any ideas on how to make their flights cheaper!

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    8. Re:A fun entry? by Psychotext · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd rather catch them in a bucket and drive them out and put them in the woods THEN break limbs in a more traditional trap.

      You sick S.O.B. :-)
      That certainly was an interesting typo!

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    9. Re:A fun entry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Or how about a few cats...

      It's sort of strange how people talk about being more humane to mice, but then think that it's okay for a cat to catch a mouse and eat it. I'm not saying it's right or wrong, but cats (or nature in general) aren't very kind when it comes to eating their prey.

      That said, cats really are the best solution. My uncle's ranch has been infested with mice as long as I can remember. Well his daughter-in-law liked cats and introduced a bunch to the place. Within a year there were no more mice. NONE. Well leave it to modern technology to over engeneer a problem I guess.

    10. Re:A fun entry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT Dumbass. Fat load of good your degrees did you. $200 000 bucks and you're dumber than fuck. Good luck with that.

    11. Re:A fun entry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This seems like a very humane trap.

      Actually, it is a very old idea.

      And the bucket is usually filled with water.

    12. Re:A fun entry? by HorsePunchKid · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure what the laws are like where you live (or where your hypothetical mouse problem is, anyway), but around these parts, catching animals and then releasing them elsewhere (on property you don't own, and presumably any property not contiguous with where they were caught) is illegal. I suppose if you owned the woods around your farm or business, you could still do it, but it would still be somewhat silly to just let them go on your property again.

      --
      Steven N. Severinghaus
    13. Re:A fun entry? by erick99 · · Score: 1

      My bad :-(

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
    14. Re:A fun entry? by James_G · · Score: 1
      *squeek* *squeek* nibble nibb.. slide scrabble pause... Thwump! Wheee!

      Outpost.com tried something similar to this as an ad campaign, with gerbils and a cannon (not real gerbils, naturally), but it was nicely done.

      Check it out

      Not as good as the pack of ravenous wolves attacking a high-school marching band though, which was another of their ads. Aah, the good old dot.com days.

    15. Re:A fun entry? by nateb · · Score: 1
      It was designed for farms and businesses that have a big problem with mice. I'd rather catch them in a bucket and drive them out and put them in the woods then break limbs in a more traditional trap. For many of these farms and businesses, leaving the mice running free is not an option. This seems like a very humane trap.

      We don't run them out into the woods. Our extra mice get dumped out in the ditch on the way to check the cows.
      Helps keep the cat population down.

      --
      -- Nate
    16. Re:A fun entry? by robslimo · · Score: 1

      Un-funny and totally off-topic. While the link you provided still works, the humorcentral site has been defaced.,

  7. Re:Other: by erick99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you can patent children, then I have two waking machines that are absolutely infallible at the task.

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  8. A more novel invention by RedFireGuy · · Score: 5, Funny
    Magazines printed on toilet paper so that:
    1. you don't have to carry anything in
    2. more hygenic
    3. can print "Remember you're running out of TP" reminder slips deep inside the roll.
    4. if an article is really full of shit, you can express yourself directly.
    --
    Absolutely Normal
    1. Re:A more novel invention by roman_mir · · Score: 1
    2. Re:A more novel invention by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      By the way, my personal experience is that The Times (a British broadsheet, in case of ambiguity) is far better for toilet paper than either Pravda or Granma. It's still not very good, but in an emergency...

    3. Re:A more novel invention by tepples · · Score: 1

      The Times (a British broadsheet, in case of ambiguity) is far better for toilet paper than either Pravda or Granma.

      You have your grandmother clean out your behind?

    4. Re:A more novel invention by pjt33 · · Score: 1
    5. Re:A more novel invention by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      The old FT was best. I haven't bought it for a while so I don't know if it still has that softer, pink paper. Any of the papers will be improved after being kept for a week however. This allows them to absorb a little moisture and thus become softer on the bottom.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  9. I quite like the Burnside mobile by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    It allows you to use a mobile network from a desk phone. Too expensive though at £500.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:I quite like the Burnside mobile by DogsBollocks · · Score: 0

      This is not exactly a new idea.
      Yes I know this one works on the digital systems but the one I describe below is so old it was on the market before the digital revolution.

      Motorola have been making an interface that allows you to plug regular desk sets or fax machines into an analogue cell phone for a long time.

      The interface goes in between the cellular handset and the cellular transceiver. It even generates dial tone when you pick up one of the phones connected to it as well as providing ringing voltages to ring connected phones or fax machines just as if they were connected to the hard wired PSTN.

      It is commonly referred to as a "cell jack", I don't know the model number and I couldn't seem to find any trace of it on Google. Mind you Motorola stopped making the analogue (3 watt) style phones several years ago.

      Very strange because GM must have a huge stash of these analogue phones somewhere because that's what they are using in all the Onstar equipped vehicles.

    2. Re:I quite like the Burnside mobile by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's already been invented but I would think the exact opposite would be a good idea.

      Once you come home with your mobile it senses that it's in range of a basestation and any calls you make from that point on go out over a land line... basicly turning your mobile into a cordless phone.

      One address book to update. Maybe calls to your cell could be routed to your landline while you were home as well.

      I actually don't have a mobile so I don't quite keep up with these things. :)

      --
      Wiwi
      "I trust in my abilities,
      but I want more then they offer"
  10. Very useful??? by jmcmunn · · Score: 0, Troll


    The MouseMaster??? This doesn't seem like a big improvement to me. You Brits sure get excited about some pointless shit!

    At least in America we get excited about things like "Ginger" (or IT if you prefer). I mean I could run over as many mice as that trap holds in a few minutes on a Segway. :-)

    Just poking fun at you folks East of the Pacific. Mostly because There's a lot of trash talk to us US folks as well.

    1. Re:Very useful??? by LowBrow · · Score: 1

      "Just poking fun at you folks East of the Pacific"

      I don't think anyone in the U.S. was offended.
      Mumbling off to the side, "East of the Atlantic" ...cough

    2. Re:Very useful??? by jmcmunn · · Score: 1


      Not to self...

      Food+Beer+TV+Slashdot != Good Idea

      My bad, gotta pay more attention to what I am doing next time, or try to defend it by saying that you will get to Europe by going east over the Pacific from Hawaii...which is clearly where I am. Nah...I give up.

  11. at the BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a second I read that as
    "New Inventions Featured at the BS"

  12. Not so sure about the inventions... by jd · · Score: 4, Informative
    ...but Professor Heinz Wolff is absolutely phenominal.


    One of his more entertaining ideas was "The Great Egg Race". Build a machine out of ordinary household junk. Any household junk you like. The only requirements are that it be able to carry a raw egg across a course without damaging or breaking the egg, and to do so in the least possible time. The only motive power allowed was a tiny elastic band.


    The idea was simple, ingenious, and triggered several fairly successful (yet geeky) competitive tech shows and inspired The Power Game - a national contest between schools along similar lines.


    (The first "Power Game" was a simple variation of the Egg Race, involving dropping coins along a race track at specific points. Missing the target was penalized heavily. The following year, competitors were asked to build near-frictionless mobile platforms that could carry a person over the longest possible distance around a complex course. Oh, and the platform had to be made of cardboard.)


    To be honest, it matters little if the BIS, any geek television show, or any techie contest, ever shows anything much. What matters is whether they inspire people to come up with things that maybe are useful. Nobody could accuse the entrants of, say, the Great Egg Race or the Micromouse Championships of producing something fundamentally worthwhile. At the same time, I'm willing to bet that many more of those people who have built things that are useful have been inspired by demonstrations of how to do a great deal with very little, than those who are fed a diet of "nobody could do that, it's too complicated!" or "only big corporations can invent!"

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Not so sure about the inventions... by Airw0lf · · Score: 1

      At the School of Engineering at the University of Auckland, they set the first year design classes the task of building such egg racers. So now we know where they got the idea from... And as the original poster said: Nobody could accuse the entrants of, say, the Great Egg Race or the Micromouse Championships of producing something fundamentally worthwhile. This is quite true, but the important thing is that people/students are encouraged to think about a challenging problem, and to look at inventive ways of overcoming it. Having developed such critical thinking skills, they can be applied to more relevant problems.

  13. Oooh! Oooh! Clip that article! by nounderscores · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Hey! Can you save that article that's just about to come off the roll about the new Microsoft IE exploit?"

    "Too late."

    "Ah well. It'll probably come up as a dupe again later."

  14. HTML cache of PDF by colonslashslash · · Score: 2, Informative
    C'mon guys, its not hard to use google cache to pull of the HTML cache of the PDF, took me about 10 seconds

    Although I do agree, it's annoying that its a PDF document in the first place. Either way, here you go:

    British Invention Show FAQ PDF > HTML google cache

    --
    She's built like a steak house, but she handles like a bistro....
    1. Re:HTML cache of PDF by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      If I have to choose bwtween a MS-Word document and Adobe PDF, I'd always choose PDF. xpdf works just fine compared to having MS-crap installed.

  15. AUTOMATIC RADIATOR BLEEDER by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    listed in the article. this isn't new...

    here's an item that's existed prior as on our boiler at my work we also use one on top of the sand filter for the pool, it has a float valve, just like a toilet, that allows air to escape, but not water..

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:AUTOMATIC RADIATOR BLEEDER by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      Why should prior art bother these Brits?? It sure as hell doesn't seem to mean anything to the USPTO...

  16. I want.... by negface · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whatever that guy has on his finger. That would kill for my wizard's DnD sessions. Plus it would be the coolest lighter ever.

  17. Re:BIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BIS?
    More like MIS. That means Majoring In Stupidity, or more simply: ass sex.

  18. Every "invention" listed already exists by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative
    Which is about typical for "invention shows". I went to the British one in 2002, when it was at the Barbican in London. The people who exhibit there have no clue how to check for prior art.

    The "expandable airport walkway" is found at smaller airports today. Santa Barbara, California, has several.

    Tilting-ramp mousetraps have been around for years and are quite effective.

    Retractable parking posts are widely used. Most are solid (there's now a big "security" market for the things) but there are lightweight ones that can be driven over.

    Everything else listed has been found by someone else, so I won't rehash that.

  19. Any chance they'll invent toothpaste/toothbrushes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe this is what they need to remedy their noted tooth decay problem.

  20. Cripes! by identity0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Huzzah! With this new "Tooth-Brush" technology, we Subjects of The Queen can now polish those hard to reach places in our teapots after teatime! Marvelous!

    Bloody queer name for a teapot brush, but whatever works, eh mate?

    (Runs and hides from enraged Englishmen)

  21. flimsy too by TheLink · · Score: 1

    How strong are these things anyway? AFAIK most are pretty flimsy. If my relative was inside and seriously incapacitated, and the door was locked only with one of these things, I'd just kick the door in. Much faster than using a key or fumbling with your hand inside.

    Of course one would have to be sure that the said relative was not lying close to the trajectory of the door that one is kicking in ;).

    p.s. only do the kicking stuff if you are wearing good boots/shoes and jeans/thick trousers, so in event the door splinters you don't end up being yet another incapacitated relative. The shoulder charge thing might work - but I'd prefer kicking.

    --
    1. Re:flimsy too by M1FCJ · · Score: 1
      I once broke a door by shouldering it. It isn't as easy at it sounds and this was a quite flimsy door.

      Breaking into your own house at 5:30am is no fun, especially the last thing your brother has done before going for a holiday was painting the door and then slamming it shut and lock while the paint is still dry. When you arrive at home after driving 12 hours, you can't be patient. Breaking the door was the fastest route to the coffee can.

    2. Re:flimsy too by TheLink · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've tried the shoulder thing and it hurts, plus not very effective coz I'm light - kinda bounce off! I'm definitely no expert - I've only kicked open about two doors - fortunately they opened inwards ( I probably shouldn't try shoudering/kicking open doors if they open outwards ;) ).

      --
  22. Best ever British invention is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marmite!

  23. This deserves a HotW:PT1 ref... by NLG · · Score: 1

    King(Armed with shotgun): PULL!
    + a mouse is flung into the air, BANG King shoots and misses +
    King: Drifting to the left. ... PULL!
    + another mouse is catapulted skyward, BANG King nails it +
    King: Fell like a stone.

    --
    Flash is the Herpes of the Internet.
    your.opinion > /dev/null
  24. My favourite mousetrap. by MuMart · · Score: 1
  25. Re:Other: by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you can patent children

    Drug companies are moving toward that very result.