Slashdot Mirror


Hibernating to Mars

neutron_p writes "Manned missions beyond the Moon are no longer wild dreams. NASA plans a manned mission to Mars before 2020. With automatic systems in control, astronauts would face the challenge of living in a confined space with not much to do for an extremely long period. 'Might as well sleep it off!' Studies initiated by ESA have gone one step further. Wouldn't it be nice if astronauts could hibernate! ESA biologists are conducting investigations into the physiological mechanisms that mammals use to hibernate."

33 of 344 comments (clear)

  1. Send newly-minted PhDs. by pedantic+bore · · Score: 4, Funny
    After I finished my dissertation, I was more than ready for a several-month nap. (Too bad it didn't work out exactly that way...)

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:Send newly-minted PhDs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean you didn't go straight to the unemployment line with your student loan bills?

  2. Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    ESA To Study Human Hibernation
    Posted by timothy on 10:20 AM -- Wednesday August 04 2004
    from the that-report-will-be-a-snooze dept.
    colonist writes "The European Space Agency (ESA) plans to study human hibernation for long-duration space voyages (a la 'Alien', '2001'). Although 'practical hibernation mechanisms are at least a decade away', ESA researchers will make initial inquiries into DADLE (D-Ala,D-Leu-enkephalin), an opium-like drug that triggers hibernation in ground squirrels and human cells. Other subjects of interest include dobutamine, a drug that maintains muscle, and the Madagascan fat-tailed dwarf lemur, the only primate known to hibernate."

  3. Just give them TV a Fridge and Chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


    works for most of USA

    1. Re:Just give them TV a Fridge and Chips by Zorilla · · Score: 4, Funny

      or a PC with an internet connection, works for all /. readers!

      Macintosh zealot in 5, 4, 3, 2....

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  4. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just gather up a bunch of geeks and toss them in the capsule. Once they get away from Earth, send a message letting them know that you accidentially packed decaf. Once the panic wears off, they'll sleep the rest of the trip.

  5. Don't hold your breath... by Dinosaur+Neil · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This strikes me as having two BIG problems right from the start:

    • Reliability - ISS crewpeople spend the bulk of their time doing housekeeping/maintenance chores. How are they gonna get a brand-new, untried vehicle to run for a six-month trip each way, without multiple someones keeping an eye on things?
    • Reality - This study is still in the "maybe we can get this to work" stage. But I've been hearing about serious studies like this since the 70's and so far no useful results. Will they have something tested and reliable in 15 years?

    This would be great, if it works, but I bet we end up doing it the hard way...

    --
    "I'm a scientist! I don't think, I observe!" - Dr. Clayton Forrester
    1. Re:Don't hold your breath... by Dinosaur+Neil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      By "the hard way" I meant going to Mars with existing tech. 15 years is a long time in "computer years", but something like long-term hibernation is going to take at least a decade to to work out the bugs because every test is going to have to run at least a few months in order to have meaning. Even if they were to come up with something that works tomorrow, it would be pushing to make it practical by 2020. Sleeping in shifts might help (a la 2001), but that would further complicate things.

      Lots of things need to be done before we go to Mars; we need far more durable, reliable and usable pressure suits, a life-support system that can run for three (minimum) years without spare parts from Earth, some sort of rover that can go more than a couple klicks, actual studies of the effects of long term exposure to low-gravity, etc. etc. Suspended animation will be useful, someday, but...

      Yes, computers, robotics, medicine, and other technologies have come a long way in a short time, but there's no gaurantee that the growth will continue; aircraft technology went from none 100 years ago to jets in the 50's, but it took another 50 years (and the X-prize) to kick things up a notch... Progress can be linear, but it doesn't have to be.

      A bit cynical, I know, but I've been disappointed by NASA for 30 years now; I watched Armstrong set foot on the moon when I was eight and was told that we'd be on Mars by the mid-80's. By the time I got out of high school, we were trapped in LEO by the shuttle. Things like this worry me because they can keep us waiting for a "perfect" solution for a loooong time...

      --
      "I'm a scientist! I don't think, I observe!" - Dr. Clayton Forrester
    2. Re:Don't hold your breath... by Jack9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As a person who has had multiple open heart surgeries, let me contradict the previous post. Open heart surgery has been practiced and studied by multiple organizations in america, since the wooden prosthetics of the 1700's. It was never bad form to operate on the heart as there had never been any "elective" surgeries that ppl could choose to have AFAIK. When you get told you have to have open heart surgery, let me tell you, YOU WANT TO GET OUT OF IT. All surgeries relating to the heart are considered necessary as certain tissues have the consistency of wet toilet paper (aortic valve for example).

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
  6. Re:Sci Fi? by Aquatopia17 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Believe it or not, Science Fiction isn't the same as Science Fact. Ever see those clips of astronauts constantly exercising? They need to do that keep up their muscles out of atophy. If muscles will atophy for an otherwise active astronaut, don't you think they'll get even worse for a hibernating astronaut? The issue of hibernating isn't as easy as it seems. Biologists today don't even fully understand animal hibernation on earth.

    --
    Don't sweat the petty things. Don't pet the sweaty things. --Stephen J. Simmons
  7. Give'm a job! by ScuzzyTerminator · · Score: 5, Funny

    Make them earn their passage by doing some programming along the way. Set up the food dispensers so that if you don't work, you don't eat. That will keep them occupied!

    1. Re:Give'm a job! by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

      If they are programming stuff they will need in Mars while GOING to Mars, they are the ultimate slackers.

    2. Re:Give'm a job! by jamesh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now that gives me an idea. Load the ship up with about 10-20 more people than required. Install hidden cameras all over the place. The audience would be able to vote 1 person off the ship at regular intervals (hence the extras :).

      Selling the show to the highest bidder would probably fund the whole trip!

  8. Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by Mal-2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would suck to be stuck in a spaceship for three years, sure. But it would also suck to fall asleep and wake up three years later -- and three years older, with absolutely nothing to show for it. Sure, external sources of damage would be nearly eliminated, so you wouldn't be three years shorter of telomeres. Also, being in one place for the duration means hard radiation shielding is much more practical than trying to hard shield the entire ship.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    1. Re:Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by moonbender · · Score: 5, Funny

      But it would also suck to fall asleep and wake up three years later -- and three years older, with absolutely nothing to show for it.

      Kind of like studying computer science... ;)

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    2. Re:Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by vhold · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hibernating must be a pretty profound state if it really means that you don't have to eat or use the bathroom for up to 7 months.

      That seems like that would slow down the systems that cause aging as well.

      Then again, their implementation of hibernation will probably come out nothing like that, it'll probably be some kind of constant drug/nutrition feed.

      An interesting question is, would you be willing to go into a matrix-esque environment for those months, where you could go to movies, read books, interact with people on earth (speed of light limitations would make this really trippy), to pass to the time while your body sleeps?

    3. Re:Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm a powernap expert and have slept for up to 36 hours in one stretch. What would you like to know?

      Not something to put on a resume, if you ask me.

    4. Re:Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by Deadstick · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Three years older and nothing to show for it...yeah, that sucks. Three years older and imminent arrival on Mars to show for it...that's a little different.

      You have to remember that 150 years ago, people would sign up for three years of dangerous, backbreaking labor aboard a cramped, stinking whaling ship and come back with nothing to show for it but enough money to get drunk and laid until the next voyage.

      rj

    5. Re:Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yea but hard radiation shielding is really the problem. Sure we can pack a bunch of Al or some other material around a enclosed area and keep out the energetic ions both from solar events and from cosmic rays but what about the neutrons? We simply have to way to stop the neutrons and packing a lot of shielding around the sleeping area will no doubt increase the number of neutrons that the travelers would absorb. Talk about keeping them busy during flight is a nice discussion for Martha Stewart but the one of the hard core science questions (besides how to get back off the Martian surface) is how to keep them from getting cancer during the trip.

      --
      "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
    6. Re:Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by dsanfte · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, you could keep their bottom halves out in space.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
  9. Changing astronaut requirements by thellamaman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Expect NASA to announce, in the next few months, that physical requirements for astronauts have now changed. All prospective recruits must now have at least 400 lbs. of body fat.

    1. Re:Changing astronaut requirements by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is funny, but it's actually on the right track. Rather than developing machines that we can sleep in for long periods of time, we should be looking at modifying humans (genetically or otherwise) so that they can survive a long trip through space. Nature has adapted us to life on Earth, we must adapt ourselves to living in other environments. Best of all would be to transplant our consciousness into durable robotic chassis with interchangeable/hot-swappable components so that we can effectively live forever and survive anywhere.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  10. A prime example of spin-off technology by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Stories like this illustrate why people who say things like "why are we spending all this money on space when we have so many problems to solve here on Earth" need to rethink their arguments. Not only would true hibernation open up voyages to destinations much farther away than Mars, but being able to put humans into hibernation would have enormous medical implications -- imagine hibernating through surgery, or in the case of something incurable, being put into hibernation (thus, persumably, greatly slowing the process of the disease) until a cure is found. Also, the advances necessary to acheive this would lead to a much better understanding of human biology generally, with attendant medical advances we can't necessarily imagine at this point.

    The usual counterargument to this is, "But if we spent the money studying ___ for its own sake, we would make the same discoveries, without the overhead of space flight!" This misses the point, IMO; we could do the research, but without an obvious need such as space flight creates, we generally wouldn't. Space exploration has provided the justification for some of the most important research the world has ever seen -- the reason "space-age technology" has fallen out of favor as an advertising slogan is because the stuff is now so woven into the fabric of our daily lives that we no longer think about its origins -- and clearly continues to do so.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:A prime example of spin-off technology by Hortensia+Patel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      we could do the research, but without an obvious need such as space flight creates, we generally wouldn't.

      Uh huh. Because it's almost impossible to raise funds for medical research. There's just no demand for living longer and surviving incurable diseases, you see. And governments won't touch it with a bargepole; political suicide.

      I don't buy this whole line of reasoning, to be honest. For one thing, it's misleading. The USA's Pentagon system shovels money into military tech in the hopes that something genuinely useful will fall out as a side-effect. And it often does, if only because a lot of military-funded research ends up being anything but military. But you can pump that money directly into civilian-oriented research instead. Japan's MITI used to do this (interestingly, their funding breakdown by tech segment was almost identical to the Pentagon's) and was rather more efficient in terms of ROI.

      More importantly, though, I think it sets the arena of debate all wrong. It's not about the spin-offs, nice though they are. The Apollo project was IMO the single most heroic and awe-inspiring achievement in human history. It wasn't an R&D lab for non-stick frying pans. Defending it in those terms feels demeaning.

      As for this particular problem, I suggest that instead of training humans to hibernate, NASA should consider training groundhogs to fly spaceships.

  11. Just be real sure... by bcrowell · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...not to hit the snooze button when you get there.

  12. Body deterioration due to lack of movement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    One of the problems in space is your body begins to weaken since there is no gravity. That, with the fact that a year of not moving even on earth would make you too weak.. One wonders.

    -Eric

  13. Re:Sci Fi? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ever see those clips of astronauts constantly exercising? They need to do that keep up their muscles out of atophy. If muscles will atophy for an otherwise active astronaut, don't you think they'll get even worse for a hibernating astronaut?

    Slowing down the metabolism slows everything down, including the process of muscle atrophy. You're right, of course, that there's a lot we don't understand about the process -- but if hibernation were the same as bed-rest, then animals that do hibernate would be too weak to move when they woke up. (And yes, being on strict bed-rest for a given period of time produces about the same degree of muscle atrophy and bone density loss as being in microgravity for the same period of time.) Odds are that hibernating astronauts would be in a lot better shape whent they got to Mars than they would be if they were awake the whole time.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  14. NASA is dumb by Charcharodon · · Score: 5, Funny
    Why do they get so worked up over social group issues and confinement for astonauts on long space journeys. If the standard "NASA astronaut" (bunch of over achiever egomaniacs anyway) can't hack it then they need to change the standard.

    I say you surf the net and find the biggest net geeks they can find that never log off. After a spot check at their house to see they do in fact only leave their room to shit, get pizza, soda, and beer then sign them up to be astronauts. These guys wouldn't even notice they have left earth, much less have difficulty handling the isolation. That is of course till Halflife 3 came out and wouldn't run on their computers.

    Then we would have to have an emergency mission. Of course we could get ATI or NVIDIA to pay for the privlage of being "the official sponser of the graphics card upgrade rescue mission".

  15. What about exercise! by adolfojp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I thought that astronauts needed daily exercise to avoid bone and muscle loss.

    Wouldn't sleeping during the trip be detrimental to their health?

    Oh, and I don't thing that using small electric jolts to stimulate the muscles would work. There was a class action lawsuit against a company that sold such a device as exercise equipment because it didn't work. Repetitive arm movements to type and to use the mouse require more muscular strength than those devices produce but you don't see computer geeks (like me) with super strong forearms and wrists.

    Cheers,

    Adolfo

  16. Hibernation and Medicine by BoldAC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Induction of hibernation has a much more practical purpose here on earth -- organ transplant.

    If we could force an ex-planted organ into hibernation, then we wouldn't have to rush around trying to get organs into people within 6-12 hrs (it is different for each organ type).

    Hiberation may also inhibit the reperfusion injury that often complicates transplant as well.

    That's just the obvious use of medical hiberation. We already know that somebody can not be declared dead until they are "cold and dead." This is because the many cases of people appearing to be brain dead --especially children-- who have a complete recovery after warming. (So if you are going to drown, please do so in a very cold lake.)

    Imagine the day when people who are dying at home get placed into hiberation until they can be brought to the hospital and worked up. Instead of blindly trying treatments in the field, one could slow down the dying process until a cause of injury is found.

    It has always amazed me that so many animals hiberate, but we can figure out how to translate that into humans.

  17. Easy! by cmcguffin · · Score: 4, Funny

    How are they gonna get a brand-new, untried vehicle to run for a six-month trip each way, without multiple someones keeping an eye on things?

    All they have to do is have some kind of automated assistant to keep an eye on things!

    They could call it the Hybernation Assistance Lifeline.

    It could do things like keep the radio antenna lined up with Earth, and manage the opening and closing of the pod bay doors.

  18. Send HACKERS! by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've always wondered why they dont send people who are use to sitting in a chair for months at a time. ;)

    I know after I get HL2 I wont be on Slashdot for at least a week!

  19. Hibernation here on Earth. by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So they are trying to make a human hibernate for 3 years? I wonder if 4 years is possible.

    If Bush wins, I want to sleep right through it.

    --
    http://brandonbloom.name