Slashdot Mirror


Hibernating to Mars

neutron_p writes "Manned missions beyond the Moon are no longer wild dreams. NASA plans a manned mission to Mars before 2020. With automatic systems in control, astronauts would face the challenge of living in a confined space with not much to do for an extremely long period. 'Might as well sleep it off!' Studies initiated by ESA have gone one step further. Wouldn't it be nice if astronauts could hibernate! ESA biologists are conducting investigations into the physiological mechanisms that mammals use to hibernate."

78 of 344 comments (clear)

  1. Sci Fi? by ian+rogers · · Score: 2, Funny

    Haven't they been doing that in movies for years now?

    1. Re:Sci Fi? by BinaryOpty · · Score: 3, Informative

      Of course they have, where else do you think they got the idea from? But, the sci-fi hibernation often times is cryogenic. That means all of your body's cells slow down and muscle atrophy isn't a problem. If you don't have that and attempt a sort of chemically induced hibernation where your body's metabolism slows waaaaay down, then you run the risk of atrophy as well as any other type of inaction-caused disease.

    2. Re:Sci Fi? by Aquatopia17 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Believe it or not, Science Fiction isn't the same as Science Fact. Ever see those clips of astronauts constantly exercising? They need to do that keep up their muscles out of atophy. If muscles will atophy for an otherwise active astronaut, don't you think they'll get even worse for a hibernating astronaut? The issue of hibernating isn't as easy as it seems. Biologists today don't even fully understand animal hibernation on earth.

      --
      Don't sweat the petty things. Don't pet the sweaty things. --Stephen J. Simmons
    3. Re:Sci Fi? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ever see those clips of astronauts constantly exercising? They need to do that keep up their muscles out of atophy. If muscles will atophy for an otherwise active astronaut, don't you think they'll get even worse for a hibernating astronaut?

      Slowing down the metabolism slows everything down, including the process of muscle atrophy. You're right, of course, that there's a lot we don't understand about the process -- but if hibernation were the same as bed-rest, then animals that do hibernate would be too weak to move when they woke up. (And yes, being on strict bed-rest for a given period of time produces about the same degree of muscle atrophy and bone density loss as being in microgravity for the same period of time.) Odds are that hibernating astronauts would be in a lot better shape whent they got to Mars than they would be if they were awake the whole time.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    4. Re:Sci Fi? by alzoron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dropping cells to a freezing temperature doesn't kill them if they have some kind of anti-freeze in them to prevent actual freezing. Some animals are able to produce natural anti-freeze.

  2. Send newly-minted PhDs. by pedantic+bore · · Score: 4, Funny
    After I finished my dissertation, I was more than ready for a several-month nap. (Too bad it didn't work out exactly that way...)

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:Send newly-minted PhDs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean you didn't go straight to the unemployment line with your student loan bills?

  3. Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    ESA To Study Human Hibernation
    Posted by timothy on 10:20 AM -- Wednesday August 04 2004
    from the that-report-will-be-a-snooze dept.
    colonist writes "The European Space Agency (ESA) plans to study human hibernation for long-duration space voyages (a la 'Alien', '2001'). Although 'practical hibernation mechanisms are at least a decade away', ESA researchers will make initial inquiries into DADLE (D-Ala,D-Leu-enkephalin), an opium-like drug that triggers hibernation in ground squirrels and human cells. Other subjects of interest include dobutamine, a drug that maintains muscle, and the Madagascan fat-tailed dwarf lemur, the only primate known to hibernate."

  4. Just give them TV a Fridge and Chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


    works for most of USA

    1. Re:Just give them TV a Fridge and Chips by Stevyn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or since they're traveling, the 6 songs that are played on every Clear Channel radio station should zonk them out for a while.

    2. Re:Just give them TV a Fridge and Chips by Zorilla · · Score: 4, Funny

      or a PC with an internet connection, works for all /. readers!

      Macintosh zealot in 5, 4, 3, 2....

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    3. Re:Just give them TV a Fridge and Chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... 1 How about giving them a Mac, you insensitive clod?!?

  5. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just gather up a bunch of geeks and toss them in the capsule. Once they get away from Earth, send a message letting them know that you accidentially packed decaf. Once the panic wears off, they'll sleep the rest of the trip.

  6. Don't hold your breath... by Dinosaur+Neil · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This strikes me as having two BIG problems right from the start:

    • Reliability - ISS crewpeople spend the bulk of their time doing housekeeping/maintenance chores. How are they gonna get a brand-new, untried vehicle to run for a six-month trip each way, without multiple someones keeping an eye on things?
    • Reality - This study is still in the "maybe we can get this to work" stage. But I've been hearing about serious studies like this since the 70's and so far no useful results. Will they have something tested and reliable in 15 years?

    This would be great, if it works, but I bet we end up doing it the hard way...

    --
    "I'm a scientist! I don't think, I observe!" - Dr. Clayton Forrester
    1. Re:Don't hold your breath... by datastalker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Reliability - people can sleep in shifts, and not hibernate for the entire time.
      Reality - 2020 is more than 15 years from now. What has no useful results now may in 15 years. (It was considered bad form to operate on the heart thirty years ago, and now it's routine.)
      The hard way - everything is done the hard way. Every pioneering effort is. It will continue to be that way, and we either suck it up and do it, or we don't. I think the benefits outweigh the disadvantages.

    2. Re:Don't hold your breath... by Dinosaur+Neil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      By "the hard way" I meant going to Mars with existing tech. 15 years is a long time in "computer years", but something like long-term hibernation is going to take at least a decade to to work out the bugs because every test is going to have to run at least a few months in order to have meaning. Even if they were to come up with something that works tomorrow, it would be pushing to make it practical by 2020. Sleeping in shifts might help (a la 2001), but that would further complicate things.

      Lots of things need to be done before we go to Mars; we need far more durable, reliable and usable pressure suits, a life-support system that can run for three (minimum) years without spare parts from Earth, some sort of rover that can go more than a couple klicks, actual studies of the effects of long term exposure to low-gravity, etc. etc. Suspended animation will be useful, someday, but...

      Yes, computers, robotics, medicine, and other technologies have come a long way in a short time, but there's no gaurantee that the growth will continue; aircraft technology went from none 100 years ago to jets in the 50's, but it took another 50 years (and the X-prize) to kick things up a notch... Progress can be linear, but it doesn't have to be.

      A bit cynical, I know, but I've been disappointed by NASA for 30 years now; I watched Armstrong set foot on the moon when I was eight and was told that we'd be on Mars by the mid-80's. By the time I got out of high school, we were trapped in LEO by the shuttle. Things like this worry me because they can keep us waiting for a "perfect" solution for a loooong time...

      --
      "I'm a scientist! I don't think, I observe!" - Dr. Clayton Forrester
    3. Re:Don't hold your breath... by Jack9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As a person who has had multiple open heart surgeries, let me contradict the previous post. Open heart surgery has been practiced and studied by multiple organizations in america, since the wooden prosthetics of the 1700's. It was never bad form to operate on the heart as there had never been any "elective" surgeries that ppl could choose to have AFAIK. When you get told you have to have open heart surgery, let me tell you, YOU WANT TO GET OUT OF IT. All surgeries relating to the heart are considered necessary as certain tissues have the consistency of wet toilet paper (aortic valve for example).

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    4. Re:Don't hold your breath... by Eponymous+Mallard · · Score: 2, Insightful
      When you get told you have to have open heart surgery, let me tell you, YOU WANT TO GET OUT OF IT. All surgeries relating to the heart are considered necessary as certain tissues have the consistency of wet toilet paper (aortic valve for example)

      I can second that. I've been told I might need open heart surgery someday due to a perforated aortic valve, and I do indeed want to get out of it. It's scary as hell. You have my respect and sympathy for making it through.


      Funny you should mention the consistency of "wet toilet paper." I had an infection (endocarditis) that burned a tiny, 1-2mm, hole in my valve. If the hole gets larger I may need surgery. I was wondering about the odds of that occurring, so I asked my cardiologist about the consistency of the aortic valve. He compared it to chicken skin - very thin but tough. "Wet toilet paper" doesn't sound so good.


      Either way, the aortic valve is one nasty point-of-failure for the human body.


      The Eponymous Mallard -- "If it quacks like a duck, it may be The Epomymous Mallard"

    5. Re:Don't hold your breath... by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A bit cynical, I know, but I've been disappointed by NASA for 30 years now; I watched Armstrong set foot on the moon when I was eight and was told that we'd be on Mars by the mid-80's. By the time I got out of high school, we were trapped in LEO by the shuttle. Things like this worry me because they can keep us waiting for a "perfect" solution for a loooong time...

      NASA is something of a fluke. It's the result of a "pissing match" between the USSR and the USA. It would not exist in any meaningful form except fro the cold war.

      Notwithstanding the tremendous benefits that have come from the space program, (eg: NMh batteries, satellites, and too many others to name) the space program would only exist so long as there are private (CAPITAL) reasons to do so. In 100 year, NASA will be a dim memory of a failed model of developing outer-space.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    6. Re:Don't hold your breath... by Jack9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed they also fashioned wooden valves. What would suck would be to have a wooden heart valve that, even if an implant was successful, would simply corrode and fail in a few weeks. But as far as medicine goes, it was a noble effort. Better to operate on 10 patients who wouldnt last 2 days, have a 20% success rate resulting in patients that die later that month. Is a treatment that's fatal worth the extra few days when faced with certain death sooner? Whatever it takes.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
  7. In other news... by jhealy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Crazy scientist is creating psychotic robot that has the ability to wake or kill hibernating humans.

  8. Give'm a job! by ScuzzyTerminator · · Score: 5, Funny

    Make them earn their passage by doing some programming along the way. Set up the food dispensers so that if you don't work, you don't eat. That will keep them occupied!

    1. Re:Give'm a job! by spectecjr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Make them earn their passage by doing some programming along the way. Set up the food dispensers so that if you don't work, you don't eat. That will keep them occupied!

      Now that's what I call outsourcing :)

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    2. Re:Give'm a job! by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

      If they are programming stuff they will need in Mars while GOING to Mars, they are the ultimate slackers.

    3. Re:Give'm a job! by jamesh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now that gives me an idea. Load the ship up with about 10-20 more people than required. Install hidden cameras all over the place. The audience would be able to vote 1 person off the ship at regular intervals (hence the extras :).

      Selling the show to the highest bidder would probably fund the whole trip!

  9. Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by Mal-2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would suck to be stuck in a spaceship for three years, sure. But it would also suck to fall asleep and wake up three years later -- and three years older, with absolutely nothing to show for it. Sure, external sources of damage would be nearly eliminated, so you wouldn't be three years shorter of telomeres. Also, being in one place for the duration means hard radiation shielding is much more practical than trying to hard shield the entire ship.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    1. Re:Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by moonbender · · Score: 5, Funny

      But it would also suck to fall asleep and wake up three years later -- and three years older, with absolutely nothing to show for it.

      Kind of like studying computer science... ;)

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    2. Re:Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by vhold · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hibernating must be a pretty profound state if it really means that you don't have to eat or use the bathroom for up to 7 months.

      That seems like that would slow down the systems that cause aging as well.

      Then again, their implementation of hibernation will probably come out nothing like that, it'll probably be some kind of constant drug/nutrition feed.

      An interesting question is, would you be willing to go into a matrix-esque environment for those months, where you could go to movies, read books, interact with people on earth (speed of light limitations would make this really trippy), to pass to the time while your body sleeps?

    3. Re:Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by dustinbarbour · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about muscle atrophy? If I slept for six months straight, you can be damn sure that I'd have a hell of a time getting out of bed in the morning. Astro/Cosmonauts on the ISS have enough trouble as it is when they return to the planet and they're always doing stuff while on their mission to include working out!

    4. Re:Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Umm... how would you evacuate waste from a hibernating person's body if they are being constantly fed? Sounds like an unpleasant engineering challenge indeed.

    5. Re:Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm a powernap expert and have slept for up to 36 hours in one stretch. What would you like to know?

      Not something to put on a resume, if you ask me.

    6. Re:Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by Deadstick · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Three years older and nothing to show for it...yeah, that sucks. Three years older and imminent arrival on Mars to show for it...that's a little different.

      You have to remember that 150 years ago, people would sign up for three years of dangerous, backbreaking labor aboard a cramped, stinking whaling ship and come back with nothing to show for it but enough money to get drunk and laid until the next voyage.

      rj

    7. Re:Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yea but hard radiation shielding is really the problem. Sure we can pack a bunch of Al or some other material around a enclosed area and keep out the energetic ions both from solar events and from cosmic rays but what about the neutrons? We simply have to way to stop the neutrons and packing a lot of shielding around the sleeping area will no doubt increase the number of neutrons that the travelers would absorb. Talk about keeping them busy during flight is a nice discussion for Martha Stewart but the one of the hard core science questions (besides how to get back off the Martian surface) is how to keep them from getting cancer during the trip.

      --
      "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
    8. Re:Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2, Funny

      .. can you say "B Ark" boys and girls? I knew you could...

    9. Re:Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by dsanfte · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, you could keep their bottom halves out in space.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    10. Re:Does hibernation slow or stop aging? by acz · · Score: 2, Interesting
      An interesting question is, would you be willing to go into a matrix-esque environment for those months, where you could go to movies, read books, interact with people on earth (speed of light limitations would make this really trippy), to pass to the time while your body sleeps?


      Read Maze of Death from Philip K. Dick on the subject. My favorite PKD book.
  10. Changing astronaut requirements by thellamaman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Expect NASA to announce, in the next few months, that physical requirements for astronauts have now changed. All prospective recruits must now have at least 400 lbs. of body fat.

    1. Re:Changing astronaut requirements by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      And you wake up three years later at a thin 100 pounds. Forget Atkins, let's go to Mars!

      --
      When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
    2. Re:Changing astronaut requirements by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is funny, but it's actually on the right track. Rather than developing machines that we can sleep in for long periods of time, we should be looking at modifying humans (genetically or otherwise) so that they can survive a long trip through space. Nature has adapted us to life on Earth, we must adapt ourselves to living in other environments. Best of all would be to transplant our consciousness into durable robotic chassis with interchangeable/hot-swappable components so that we can effectively live forever and survive anywhere.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    3. Re:Changing astronaut requirements by jerryasher · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn you, that blows my Sigourney Weaver in heather underwear fantasies.

    4. Re:Changing astronaut requirements by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not to mention, what happens when you get on your own nerves? I hope the original me will know how to turn off the robot before I rip my head off. Hopefully, I can use my dislike of the sight of blood against me. I don't know about you, but when it comes down to me or me, I know whose side I'm on.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
  11. A prime example of spin-off technology by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Stories like this illustrate why people who say things like "why are we spending all this money on space when we have so many problems to solve here on Earth" need to rethink their arguments. Not only would true hibernation open up voyages to destinations much farther away than Mars, but being able to put humans into hibernation would have enormous medical implications -- imagine hibernating through surgery, or in the case of something incurable, being put into hibernation (thus, persumably, greatly slowing the process of the disease) until a cure is found. Also, the advances necessary to acheive this would lead to a much better understanding of human biology generally, with attendant medical advances we can't necessarily imagine at this point.

    The usual counterargument to this is, "But if we spent the money studying ___ for its own sake, we would make the same discoveries, without the overhead of space flight!" This misses the point, IMO; we could do the research, but without an obvious need such as space flight creates, we generally wouldn't. Space exploration has provided the justification for some of the most important research the world has ever seen -- the reason "space-age technology" has fallen out of favor as an advertising slogan is because the stuff is now so woven into the fabric of our daily lives that we no longer think about its origins -- and clearly continues to do so.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:A prime example of spin-off technology by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You make it sound like technology never grows without space flight. It may have been true years ago when space programs were part of the cold war, but it's not true anymore.

      For the last 20 years or so, technologies developed outside of the government space programs have benefited them, rather than the other way around.

      Lets put it this way, name 5 things the space program has pushed forward with development on in the last 10 years. Things useful to everyone.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:A prime example of spin-off technology by geekoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      first off, a lot of techology takes longet then10 years to reach market. Smoke detectors are a good example.
      second, there is going to be less, becasue NASA keeps getting there budget slashed
      third, Many thing that get to market are inside other products you don't relize.
      forth, the answer to your question:
      artificial Heart

      Automotive Insulation

      Balance Evaluation Systems

      Bioreactor

      Diagnostic Instrument

      Gas Detector

      Infrared Camera

      Infrared Thermometer

      Jewelry Design

      Land Mine Removal Device

      Lifesaving Light

      Prosthesis Material

      Rescue Tool

      Vehicle Tracking System

      Video Stabilization Software

      more here:
      http://www.sti.nasa.gov/tto/
      http://www.st i.nasa.gov/tto/spinselect.html
      http://www.thespac eplace.com/nasa/spinoffs.html

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:A prime example of spin-off technology by Hortensia+Patel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      we could do the research, but without an obvious need such as space flight creates, we generally wouldn't.

      Uh huh. Because it's almost impossible to raise funds for medical research. There's just no demand for living longer and surviving incurable diseases, you see. And governments won't touch it with a bargepole; political suicide.

      I don't buy this whole line of reasoning, to be honest. For one thing, it's misleading. The USA's Pentagon system shovels money into military tech in the hopes that something genuinely useful will fall out as a side-effect. And it often does, if only because a lot of military-funded research ends up being anything but military. But you can pump that money directly into civilian-oriented research instead. Japan's MITI used to do this (interestingly, their funding breakdown by tech segment was almost identical to the Pentagon's) and was rather more efficient in terms of ROI.

      More importantly, though, I think it sets the arena of debate all wrong. It's not about the spin-offs, nice though they are. The Apollo project was IMO the single most heroic and awe-inspiring achievement in human history. It wasn't an R&D lab for non-stick frying pans. Defending it in those terms feels demeaning.

      As for this particular problem, I suggest that instead of training humans to hibernate, NASA should consider training groundhogs to fly spaceships.

  12. Two words: by elid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdot archives That should keep them busy for awhile

  13. Light speed by 3770 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd have to recommend near light speed instead. First of all, the trip will be faster. And as an added bonus, time will pass faster.

    The trip will feel as if it was from now... to... now. Or even faster, from now to now. Or maybe even from nowtonow if they are really close to light speed.

    The one advantage with the hibernation thing is that they might feel really rested when they get there.

    --
    The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
  14. Just be real sure... by bcrowell · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...not to hit the snooze button when you get there.

  15. Body deterioration due to lack of movement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    One of the problems in space is your body begins to weaken since there is no gravity. That, with the fact that a year of not moving even on earth would make you too weak.. One wonders.

    -Eric

    1. Re:Body deterioration due to lack of movement by jimmyeatmud · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The concept of hibernation is to get every system in the body to slow down. The muscles in your body deteriorate when you start to live sedentary because your system is still at full power. If you run your body at 1% and remain still your muscles will retain their strength and flexibility and still be useful when you are "rebooted".

      My question is what happens to the brain when it is rebooted. Over hibernating animals we have a consciousness and where does that go when our brain is suspended? If it's purely biological then it will still be there, if it is something spiritual then who knows?

  16. HAL 9000. by neodude88 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just look at 2001: A Space Odyssey; if you hibernate to a distant place with a super AI computer watching over your critical life support functions and the spaceship, you'll die a nasty, red-LED blinking death. Just don't codename the computer HAL 9000...

  17. Mars crew returns to earth by halftrack · · Score: 3, Funny

    CNN-reporter: I'm standing here with Mr. Carter, first human on Mars. So, tell me, Mr. Carter, how was it like?

    Mr. Carter: *Gasp* I don't know. O.K. I guess, but I had this wonderful dream about a great pink mushroom and a sea of chockolate. Ahh ... if only I could return. Maybe tonight.

    --
    Look a monkey!
  18. Good idea. Let's tweak some humans by Trikenstein · · Score: 3, Funny

    What could possibly go wrong with that?

  19. If I want to be an astronaut by RealProgrammer · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... do I have to live on salmon and wild berries? I like salmon well enough, but berries make my nether region itch.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  20. NASA is dumb by Charcharodon · · Score: 5, Funny
    Why do they get so worked up over social group issues and confinement for astonauts on long space journeys. If the standard "NASA astronaut" (bunch of over achiever egomaniacs anyway) can't hack it then they need to change the standard.

    I say you surf the net and find the biggest net geeks they can find that never log off. After a spot check at their house to see they do in fact only leave their room to shit, get pizza, soda, and beer then sign them up to be astronauts. These guys wouldn't even notice they have left earth, much less have difficulty handling the isolation. That is of course till Halflife 3 came out and wouldn't run on their computers.

    Then we would have to have an emergency mission. Of course we could get ATI or NVIDIA to pay for the privlage of being "the official sponser of the graphics card upgrade rescue mission".

  21. Induce depression. by achilstone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wouldn't a long trip without the prospect of seeing friends and family for 4 years (assume 2 years each way) with lack of light and natural exercise plus the fact of being stuck with the same people cause depressive like symtoms in the astronauts.
    E.g. Oversleeping, loss of appetite, general tiredness etc.
    Would these symtoms actually be useful for a long Mars like trip or would it backfire with the astronauts freaking out?
    Perhaps studies carried out of prisoners kept in near isolation with a borderline diet could give some pointers as to what to expect.

  22. What about exercise! by adolfojp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I thought that astronauts needed daily exercise to avoid bone and muscle loss.

    Wouldn't sleeping during the trip be detrimental to their health?

    Oh, and I don't thing that using small electric jolts to stimulate the muscles would work. There was a class action lawsuit against a company that sold such a device as exercise equipment because it didn't work. Repetitive arm movements to type and to use the mouse require more muscular strength than those devices produce but you don't see computer geeks (like me) with super strong forearms and wrists.

    Cheers,

    Adolfo

    1. Re:What about exercise! by Xiph · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, i assume that since all body processes are slowed down when hibernating, so is the processes responsible for muscle loss.

      also as i read this, the same technology would be usefull for organ-transplants (keeping the donor-organs alive for longer) and as mentioned by someone else, keep people in near-stasis untill their ailment can be treated.

      /Xiph

      --
      Blah blah sig blah blah blah irony blah blah
  23. Re:Hopefully this research will bear fruit soon.. by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    wont it be nice to have a president whose term in office you can sleep through?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  24. What I would do instead of hibernating by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would just spend all day reading Slashdot.

    Oh, wait...

  25. Or hibernate drop outs by GrAfFiT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or hibernate prisonners so they take less place, surveillance and don't appeal... reminds me of some movie from Spi*lerg and/or book from P. K. D*ck. Frightening ?

  26. Hibernation and Medicine by BoldAC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Induction of hibernation has a much more practical purpose here on earth -- organ transplant.

    If we could force an ex-planted organ into hibernation, then we wouldn't have to rush around trying to get organs into people within 6-12 hrs (it is different for each organ type).

    Hiberation may also inhibit the reperfusion injury that often complicates transplant as well.

    That's just the obvious use of medical hiberation. We already know that somebody can not be declared dead until they are "cold and dead." This is because the many cases of people appearing to be brain dead --especially children-- who have a complete recovery after warming. (So if you are going to drown, please do so in a very cold lake.)

    Imagine the day when people who are dying at home get placed into hiberation until they can be brought to the hospital and worked up. Instead of blindly trying treatments in the field, one could slow down the dying process until a cause of injury is found.

    It has always amazed me that so many animals hiberate, but we can figure out how to translate that into humans.

    1. Re:Hibernation and Medicine by BoldAC · · Score: 2, Informative

      sorry...

      Corrections...

      - Can not be declared dead until they are "warm and dead."

      - It has always amazed me that so many animals hiberate, but we can not figure out how to translate that into humans.

      Trying to watch Ole Miss vs Auburn, UNC vs Miami, and type on slashdot all at one time.

    2. Re:Hibernation and Medicine by ramk13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > It has always amazed me that so many animals hiberate, but we can figure out how to translate that into humans.

      I think there's been some work on studying hibernation, but even if we get a really good understanding of how it works, that doesn't mean that we can translate it to humans easily. A crude comparison would be to say that since we now how birds fly we should be able to make humans fly... There are genetically coded mechanisms in place that allow for hibernation and it's not trivial to recreate those mechanisms without the genes in place.

      Also hibernation implies that there is still metabolic activity, but it's slower than normal. For an organ to be hibernation, you would still need to provide it oxygen and nutrients, just at a much lower rate than you normally would.

      Not to say that it can't be done, but we are far from hibernation for humans and even farther from true metabolic suspension (which no animals do).

  27. Easy! by cmcguffin · · Score: 4, Funny

    How are they gonna get a brand-new, untried vehicle to run for a six-month trip each way, without multiple someones keeping an eye on things?

    All they have to do is have some kind of automated assistant to keep an eye on things!

    They could call it the Hybernation Assistance Lifeline.

    It could do things like keep the radio antenna lined up with Earth, and manage the opening and closing of the pod bay doors.

  28. Send HACKERS! by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've always wondered why they dont send people who are use to sitting in a chair for months at a time. ;)

    I know after I get HL2 I wont be on Slashdot for at least a week!

  29. Learn the lessons of Doom 3 by nxtr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Make sure to send the astronauts with plenty of firepower. Chainguns, rocket launchers, armor and a chainsaw would be plenty enough to keep those aliens at bay. Don't let the spam get to the astronauts too. They'd be pretty pissed off at that.

  30. Hibernation here on Earth. by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So they are trying to make a human hibernate for 3 years? I wonder if 4 years is possible.

    If Bush wins, I want to sleep right through it.

    --
    http://brandonbloom.name
  31. Muscle Loss by peanutious · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sleeping it off sounds like a great idea, if only muscle loss could be stopped during the rest period. Astronauts already have a hard enough time keeping in shape for their ride home when they're awake.

  32. Dreaming in Hibernation by brandonp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder what the dreams would be like in extended Hibernation. I get some crazy dreams sometimes, what happens when you don't wake up for a few weeks?

    I wonder what stage of sleep you would be in, REM sleep? Or would it be a differege stage that has fewer dreams?

    I'm really curious what the studies will find out about dreams in Hiberantion.

    Brandon Petersen
    Get Firefox!

  33. Manned mission by 2020? by ravenspear · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm curious to know the source the submitter had in mind when he stated that NASA is planning a manned mission to Mars before 2020. I have not seen anything like that come out of NASA.

    The President's roadmap they recently adopted only had manned missions to the moon resuming by 2020.

  34. Fastest but most controversial way to go to Mars. by antispam_ben · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps there will be less hibernating time necessary, but this method wouldn't be controversial if the mission were to the nearest star...

    That's right, make it a one-way trip! Without the return leg, it would be substantially less expensive. And of course, yes, only send those of sound mind who freely decide to go, knowing they won't come back, at least not on this ship.* For that matter, it might even be less expensive to also send unpersonned supply ships every few months to keep them alive and exploring indefinitely than to do just one 'standard' round trip mission. The amount learned about Mars would certainly be much greater with a permanent base for the first mission than with several round trips in the same timeframe.

    * How to handle the public reaction, or whether to tell the public the truth, and other such PR stuff is beyond the scope of this comment.

    Well, here goes my karma...

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  35. you got it backwards by geg81 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    we could do the research, but without an obvious need such as space flight creates, we generally wouldn't

    Hibernation has been of interest to physiologists, medical doctors, and biologists for a long time because it has lots of practical applications. Claiming that its "origin" is related to manned space travel is false advertising.

  36. Re:Reality check... by Goonie · · Score: 2, Informative
    Gravity: We need gravity to keep our muscle mass and bones strong. Considering these astronauts will experience no gravity for six months each way I do not see how this will be possible. Life on the space station for this period of time can not be used as evidence that it is possible to for extended hibernation space travel. Astronauts on the space station spend hours each day exercising in order to delay the breakdown of muscle and bone. I don't think a manned mission to Mars will be possible until we can "create" gravity.

    There are several possible ways around this:

    • Rotate the spacecraft. More to the point, attach your spacecraft to a counterweight (like the empty upper stage of the rocket you used to lift you off earth), and spin the system. Instant "gravity", add water and stir. Poses a few minor engineering difficulties (high data rate antennas need to follow the earth, getting the spin started, doing course corrections while keeping the tether taut etc) but it's certainly doable.
    • Do the trip faster. There are technologies available that could almost certainly be developed within your lifetime to do the trip much faster than present technologies. Aside from the 1950's-tech Nuclear Pulse Propulsion, which could certainly be developed but is unlikely to be politically acceptable, there are a number of things like ion drive and the recent Magbeam proposal on the drawing boards that could reduce the trip time in half at least.

      As to the political will, these things can change very quickly. Imagine if China announced they were going to send a mission to Mars to claim it for China...

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  37. That kind of isolation is self-imposed. by Kjella · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You may not realize it, but there's a world of difference between sitting in your house as opposed to really being isolated. If you were to be ill or injured, you could seek a doctor. If something broke down, you could call a handyman. If the pizza and soda guy had delivery problems, you could get food elsewhere.

    In space, you can do none of those things. Even if you don't need them, the knowledge that you can't get them is a heavy burden. If the food supply broke down, you would starve and it'd be longer to deliver emergency rations to you than the most obscure third world country on earth. Hell, your air supply could break down and you'd suffocate.

    In addition, putting a bunch of introverts together will quickly lead to disaster, as they are forced to live on top of eachother in cramped quarters. Nowhere to be alone. Nowhere to go. Every annoying characteristic of your co-travelers, you will have to deal with.

    For this sort of mission, you would want people that are more like polar scientists, people who've had to endure real isolation. If you want to test your suggestion, a polar base is where you'd send them. I bet most wouldn't last a month.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  38. Better than hibernation by ChiralSoftware · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Wouldn't it be better to work on some way of getting to Mars faster rather than figuring out ways to go slower? Just showing up on Mars once, making some great quote ("One small step...") and heading home with some rocks seems pointless. It was pointless the last time we pull such a stunt. If we want to get some value out of this, we need to find a way to get to and from the Red Planet quickly. Finding a way to do it without getting bored isn't an advance in the right direction.

    I'm a lot more interested in great new nuclear propulsion technologies than figuring out some way to pass the time.

    Once we have a quick round-trip propulsion system, routine flights might be possible, opening up all kinds of possibilities.

    Also, if we have a powerful propulsion system, it does start opening up even more far-flung expeditions, like unmanned long-term trips outside the solar system even.

    Of course, IANARS.

  39. Computer Games by Databass · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the problem is not to have the astronauts go insane with boredom en route to Mars, may I suggest that computer games could go a long way towards this goal?

    I've gone for days at a time, waking up, getting on my computer until I have to go to sleep, then sleeping and doing it again. I could porbably do it for months at a time if I had to. I could, in THEORY, even take short breaks to "do astronaut stuff" like checking systems and what not.

    If NASA wants to fund some kind of "lock me in a room and play games" challenge, I'll participate. ; -)

  40. Give them... by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...some fake jobs to do. A computer panel full of buttons that have to be pushed in sequence daily or the whole ship explodes. Add to that some actual physical exertion (like removing axle rods from somewhere that are rusty) at random intervals as well. Keep it quiet so only the scientists and some engineers know what's up.

    Yeah, give the astronauts lots of fake jobs which will then lead to fake drama as someone forgets to pull rod 14 on schedule and the core threatens meltdown. Tie it in to emergency evac announcements and lots of flashing lights. I could see this being profitable from a television standpoint as well. That in turn will help fund the mission or a future mission like it.

    Think about it this way: if you're always threatened by disaster but always avert it just in the nick of time, you never know if it's true or not. The astronauts will never wise up. :)