Slashdot Mirror


Clothing For Gadget Guys

Andru Edwards writes "In an article looking at the advancements in clothing for gear loving professionals, it becomes apparent that you no longer need to sacrifice your gadgets for style. SCOTTeVEST has recently released a sport jacket, khakis, and tie all specifically tailored with hidden pockets and compartments for businessmen who don't want to leave their tech at home. The clothing includes an integrated tunnel system which allows you to hide all the wires affiliated with your devices within the lining of the item, aptly dubbed the "Personal Area Network"."

154 comments

  1. Weight by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Besides the bulky (non-fitting) feel in these jackets as mentioned in the article, I would imagine it's going to be heavy carrying so many items with you.

    Maybe there's a reason why traditional clothing has fewer pockets, so that you are not obliged to bring everything out.

    And where's a TEC Dress for women? Or is the market for female already competitive enough with big handbags?

    1. Re:Weight by Kjuib · · Score: 2, Insightful

      well... If you are like me and carry the gadgets anyways, then you are use to the weight. The problem comes in with wires going places, and the fact of looking like a geek. So, these clothes would be a nice addition and make things a little easier to carry around.

      --
      - Your stupidity got you into this mess, why can't it get you out? -Will Rogers
    2. Re:Weight by fireboy1919 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, that ends up not being a problem.

      See, you have to sell all your tech stuff to afford the jacket and pants. What you actually end up putting in the pockets is tissues to wipe your eyes while you mourn the passing of your beloved gadgets.

      As far as womens clothing, have you ever seen a dress with pockets? Or shirts for women with shirtpockets? Not that they'd necessarily make dresses for women, but it shows the point: you don't get a lot of pockets on dresses. And yet, somehow, womens clothing is often more expensive.

      How can they compete? Their clothing has (unsightly?) pockets, unlike the apparently desirable non-functional women's clothing.

      What they should really do is make lingerie, since women wear that for guys anyway. Just picture it: first, think of the most attractive woman you've seen in lingerie. Now imagine that inside that lingerie has hidden gadgets in it. To me, that attractive woman is now much more well-endowed.

      Of course, this would only work based upon the assumption that geek guys have significant others, so...I don't know. Probably wouldn't work.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    3. Re:Weight by karnal · · Score: 4, Funny

      inside that lingerie has hidden gadgets in it.

      Lingerie already has hidden gadgets in it. It's called boobies.

      Just gotta get the lingerie off her.....

      --
      Karnal
    4. Re:Weight by gl4ss · · Score: 0

      only if you're puny to begin with har har! /joke.

      seriously though, the jacket looks good. lots of pockets. i hate jackets that don't use the inside well enough(just sewing some pockets there costs next to nothing anyways and really helps around.. most of the time they seem like they're meant for a cig pack or something only)..

      women have purses that they use for _everything_, and carrry around to _everywhere_...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Weight by cerberus4696 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have one of these, and the weight is actually barely noticable while you're wearing it. They did something with the shoulders that distributes the weight a bit like a backpack would.

    6. Re:Weight by shalla · · Score: 1

      women have purses that they use for _everything_, and carrry around to _everywhere_...

      Not by choice.

      I have one small purse. In it I carry my money, my ID, and a leatherman. (I'm a geek. I can't help it--a leatherman is just so useful.) If blankety blank women's clothing designers would put POCKETS in their clothing, I'd go completely purseless. It's a pain to have to always keep track of where my purse is and it interferes when carrying other items.

      I'd love to see more practical, decently professional looking items for women. I'd be happy to start with a few pockets then add tech gear.

      Saying "women have purses, they don't need this" is kind of like saying "men have briefcases, they don't need this." No one NEEDS it, but it would be darn useful.

    7. Re:Weight by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, my apologies.

      but i know women who use clothes with pockets(about the same amount of pocketability as my levi's have, enough for a cellphone, wallet and such).. and carry the purse around, and seem to do so by choice most of the time(because they for one reason or another need, or think they need, a crapload of stuff).

      (briefcases don't really compare.. you wouldn't carry one to a bar for example.. not that i carry one anywhere though)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:Weight by freakmn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but do they run {Linux, BSD, insert os here}?

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    9. Re:Weight by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It's quite handy.

      I have 2 microphones in the croakies on my glasses, the thin wire runs down my shirt to the minidisc recorder or portable DAT recorder in my kakis pants pockets. I love the E pants, you can not tell the items are there.

      this way I can get a great stereo recording at any concert or bar event I go to.

      I love violating copyrights!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:Weight by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

      hell, if not for the social faux pa I'd wear a purse with me. It gets annoying having a cell phone in one pocket, my big ring of keys in another, my pda somewhere else (actually I don't even take it with me because it's so hard to find a place for it)... the list goes on and on.

    11. Re:Weight by floydman · · Score: 1

      As far as womens clothing, have you ever seen a dress with pockets? Or shirts for women with shirtpockets? Not that they'd necessarily make dresses for women, but it shows the point: you don't get a lot of pockets on dresses. And yet, somehow, womens clothing is often more expensive.

      Actually when i come to think of it, the less women clothing has of anything, the more expensive it becomes. Which is quite contradicitive to the "it has raw material which cost us..." theory.Pretty funny

      --
      The lunatic is in my head
  2. Wait a second by gustgr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it becomes apparent that you no longer need to sacrifice your gadgets for style

    Since when do the nerds/geeks worry about clothing style?

    1. Re:Wait a second by Chemisor · · Score: 1

      > when do the nerds/geeks worry about clothing style?

      When picking up chicks, of course. Uh... On the internet.

    2. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Since when do the nerds/geeks worry about clothing style?

      Some of us have real jobs, and make real money.

    3. Re:Wait a second by bunnyman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Since puberty.

    4. Re:Wait a second by Thaelon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Since when do the nerds/geeks worry about clothing style?

      Since some of us want to have more than a plutonic relationship with a living breathing female human.

      --

      Question everything

    5. Re:Wait a second by lphuberdeau · · Score: 1

      I guess you just understood the entire point of life ;) It works a whole lot better in bars than on the net...

      I just wear cargo pants and can fit about all I need in them and still have a few pockets available. I just don't carry magazines with me all the time. Still, those clothings look quite good if your boss doesn't accept punk-style clothings.

      --
      Qui ne va pas à la chasse n'a pas de gibier
      PHP Queb
    6. Re:Wait a second by potHead42 · · Score: 1

      You really have to be a nerd if you only have plutonic relationships with women.

    7. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sig fits the post brillianty, I'm impressed.

      Sorry to hear about your hellish past relationships! Just goes to show you, most women with the body of a goddess are nothing more than sirens.

    8. Re:Wait a second by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Plutonic relationships?? That's just fucking Goofy.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    9. Re:Wait a second by geekoid · · Score: 1

      thus exiting from the realm of Nerdom...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:Wait a second by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      Since when do the nerds/geeks worry about clothing style?

      If someone thinks an over-priced anorak and a pair of escaped-from-the-70s slacks, which would get you thrown out of a baked bean can barcode collectors convention for being embarassingly nerdy, will give them style, they are probably safe from any need to worry.

      It's not even good nerd-fodder, wires are SO 20th century!

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
  3. Oakley sunglasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    even oakley are getting in on the act...

    http://www.oakley.com/catalog/eyewear/thump/

    a very nice pair of shades, with a built in mp3 player.

    1. Re:Oakley sunglasses by po_boy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      a very nice pair of shades, with a built in mp3 player.

      Nope, those aren't nice shades at all. In fact, they look downright ridiculous.
    2. Re:Oakley sunglasses by alatesystems · · Score: 1

      I saw those on the screensavers last night. Alex had them on; when you are inside, they expect you to flip it up and you look like some kind of alien/dork.

      I totally wouldn't buy those, and they cost a shitload. When Sarah said "and when you're indoors..." I totally thought she was going to hit a button and the lcd would fade or something to be clear glasses, and then she flipped them up on Alex's head. TOTALLY disappointing.

    3. Re:Oakley sunglasses by blanktek · · Score: 2, Informative

      These are functional, not really for style. Lance Armstrong has been seen using them (may have helped design them), as they are designed for sports where wires can get in the way. http://www.engadget.com/entry/3238124135734335/

    4. Re:Oakley sunglasses by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      when you are inside, they expect you to flip it up and you look like some kind of alien/dork.

      It's called truth in advertising.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    5. Re:Oakley sunglasses by Agent__Smith · · Score: 0

      Did you bother to check the price?!? $495 U$ for the 256Meg pair. I can buy 2 iPod minis with 4 gigs each or a 40 Gig with money left over. Or a lot of other great players out there. I could even opt for a 20 Gig player, get a decent looking pair of Revos and walk away with money left over. They will probably sell a few, but I sure would not want to walk into work with something that looks like that! I would never hear the end of it.

      --
      "It seems that we are at the age where life stops giving us things, and starts taking them away..." Indiana Jones
  4. Ah yes... by rackhamh · · Score: 1

    Isn't it amazing how technology simplifies our lives?

    1. Re:Ah yes... by Aloekak · · Score: 5, Funny
      From the story: "The clothing includes an integrated tunnel system which allows you to hide all the wires affiliated with your devices within the lining of the item..."

      Quote: Isn't it amazing how technology simplifies our lives?

      Oh, I can certainly see how this would simplify my life. Picture this:
      1. Get Vest, Kahkis, Backpack.
      2. Hide mp3 player, digital camera connected to laptop in backpack, etc.
      3. Run wires for headphones and other gadgets.
      4. Go board plane.
    2. Re:Ah yes... by freedom_india · · Score: 4, Funny
      4. Go board plane.

      5. Next stop: Guantanamo !!!

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    3. Re:Ah yes... by Southpaw018 · · Score: 1

      Yes, thank you for outright stating the joke that was only funny when implicit.

      --
      ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    4. Re:Ah yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this is a joke. But it would actually be better to have all this stuff in a vest rather than your pockets. You take off the vest, run it through the x-ray, they inspect it, and then you can put it back on; otherwise you will spend an hour pulling gadgets out of your pants, and if you miss any you will set off the metal detector and then get the "personal" attention we all hate so much.

      I've stopped flying for holidays. It's a two hour plane flight to visit my family and a 16 hour drive, and I've decided the drive is better. Yes, it's partly because then I don't need to rent a car when I arrive, but it's also partly because airport security is so annoying these days.

      True story: I was once made to go back through the metal detector again, because the first time I went through I happened to have my hands tucked into my pockets. I guess we all know that when your hands are tucked into your pockets, the metal detector can't see metal things... no, I guess we don't know that, I guess the security screener was just being silly.

    5. Re:Ah yes... by cerberus4696 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Belive me, it is indeed easier to have a vest. Instead of having to reach into various pockets to fish out keys, wallet, cellphone, pda, loose change, etc., I just keep everything in the vest. That way, I can just put my belt, shoes and the vest on the tray and go through without any problem. The vest occasionally gets some odd reactions from the security guys as it goes through, but I've never had a problem with it.

    6. Re:Ah yes... by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      sorry. couldn't resist;)

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    7. Re:Ah yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, being able to put everything in the vest and then go put the entire vest through the x-ray machine makes my traveling life SO much easier...

  5. Dockers mobile pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I loved those pants. I'm really bitter Dockers discontinued them. Lots of pockets that weren't too bulky and really made for geeks working in an office environment. Bring back the mobile pants! (with extra stain protection and wrinkle-free-ness!)

    1. Re:Dockers mobile pants by GaryOlson · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Absolutely...I have 5 pair of Docker mobile pants I wear on a daily basis. My Docker.conf

      Lower left: cell phone and reversible screwdriver

      Lower right: PDA

      Upper inside: pager on vibrate

      upper outside right: USB drive with emergency software kit

      Upper outside left: RF employee badge

      Other pockets: wallet, change, stupid pieces of paper people give me instead of using email.

      Docker stopped production due to inadequate sales. Their premier advertisement was terrible; I don't know which lamers they used as a control group. And, the geeks here on slashdot have no one but themselves to blame for the lack of sales. Go out and SPEND your massive paychecks at the local Dockers store!

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    2. Re:Dockers mobile pants by nusratt · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I have 5 pair of Docker mobile pants I wear on a daily basis"

      So, what idiosyncracy requires that you change your pants 4 times in one day?

    3. Re:Dockers mobile pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stupid pieces of paper people give me instead of using email

      Bit of a word order problem there. You surely meant:

      pieces of paper stupid people give me instead of using email

    4. Re:Dockers mobile pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Docker stopped production due to inadequate sales. Their premier advertisement was terrible; I don't know which lamers they used as a control group. And, the geeks here on slashdot have no one but themselves to blame for the lack of sales. Go out and SPEND your massive paychecks at the local Dockers store!"

      How can I do that if they are out of production?

    5. Re:Dockers mobile pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he means he wears them all at the same time. Or keeps them in one another: "I open my Portable Pants, and drop in my Vest of Holding!"

    6. Re:Dockers mobile pants by geekoid · · Score: 1

      thats exactly the king of question the leads to goatse.

      [old guy voice]
      In My Day, we only had to change our pants when a petrified Natlie Portman poured grits down them.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Dockers mobile pants by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      "a petrified Natlie Portman"

      Mmmmm-mmmm. I'm getting confused with a spiderman flashback now (the rain scene), but I don't mind that much :)

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  6. Hidden cargo pants by atomic-penguin · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Is that an iPod in your pants or are you just happy to see me?"

    --
    /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
    1. Re:Hidden cargo pants by dedeman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, more appropriately,

      Is that a thumbdrive in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

    2. Re:Hidden cargo pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But chicks aren't into thumb drives, she was only hitting on him because she thought it was an ipod.

      Now, if you modded a thumbdrive to put it in an ipod case, you could pick up chicks AND impress the geeks on slashdot!

    3. Re:Hidden cargo pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But chicks aren't into thumb drives

      Yes, just confirming the intended point that size does matter.

    4. Re:Hidden cargo pants by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Ok, then why do they like the iPod Mini so much?!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:Hidden cargo pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! I have an entire enclosure in my pants... it's a bit SCSI, though.

  7. Appropriate by ThePlague · · Score: 0

    It is fitting that these clothes, designed for geeks or at the very least technophiles, form a PAN.

    I'll never grow up! I'll fight pirates! And if SpaceShip One goes commercial, I'll fly!

  8. Is it worth the price? by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For that price, I can buy a nice trenchcoat (personal style, they don't have it) and sew interior black pockets for almost nothing. Customizable, killer look. But I agree that its a cool vest, if it fits your style.

    The best part from their product description :

    "you can even fit a laptop in the back pocket!*"

    Hmmm... what about no? Greatest Idea Ever(tm).

    1. Re:Is it worth the price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you can even fit a laptop in the back pocket!*"

      I don't think they are saying you would normally do that. But it can be nice sometimes when you need to carry a bunch of stuff to tuck some extra stuff in a back pocket. I have a "photo journalist" vest and one time we wound up tucking several water bottles into the big pocket in the back; I wanted the weight in the middle and in the back, rather than trying to carry the bottles in pockets on the front or in my hands. If we had been planning in advance to have me carry the bottles we would have brought something better to carry them in, but that's the point -- we didn't plan anything and I was already wearing the vest.

      If they said "Carry your laptop in the back pocket every day!" then your ridicule would be justified. They didn't say that.

    2. Re:Is it worth the price? by floydman · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can buy a nice trenchcoat (personal style, they don't have it) and sew interior black pockets for almost nothing.

      Do you by any chance use Genetoo?

      --
      The lunatic is in my head
  9. A primitive solution by InternationalCow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Come on, with modern fiber technology we could do better than that. We could at least have the wiring integrated into the fabric, so you could just plug in all of your gadgets in a few handy sockets sewn into the pockets. And while we're at it, why no Bluetooth and 802.11 b/g integrated? It could even be washable. After all, clothing such as that is already being prototyped (here). I don't think that there is a market for the stuff that is being plugged here. I myself am decked out with electronics every day and I would only exchange my current solution (belt clips and doctor's smock with lots of pockets) for true wearable electronics.

    --
    ----- One learns to itch where one can scratch.
    1. Re:A primitive solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My jacket has a control panel on the sleeve that is connected to my minidisc player(in a breast pocket) through a conductive fabric.

      It's the analog MD clone.

    2. Re:A primitive solution by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      It may be possible, but has it been achieved outside a lab yet? A prototype is often an experimental model to see if it will work right and to test market interest. There is the practicality aspect, like whether it works, is reasonably affordable to the target market and whether it is reliable.

      The link you gave is partly for a concept design only introduced a couple months ago, I think it is too much to expect it to be available to a retailer in the next year, never mind in several months or now. There is that jacket with a built-in audio player but 600 Euros for a jacket is a bit much, I'd rather a $100-$200 jacket with a $300 iPod - a device I can use with other jackets or without a jacket at all.

    3. Re:A primitive solution by Carcinogentic · · Score: 1

      Modern fibre technology? Optical fibre is not something to be used near the human body. It will not bend and it will not survive twisting. Ok you can intergrate wiring into the fabric but what wiring do you intergrate into the fabric? Anything you put in will at some point become obsolete so if it is possible and easy to remove the wiring you have future proofed the garment.
      As for bluetooth and radio intergration. radio/micro waves are blocked by water, thats how your microwave oven works. Having bluetooth systems near your body would a) not work b) cause all those things atributed to mobile phones, with the added chance of you burning yourself while on the phone.
      Did you not read the bit in the article that said that these garments were made for bisiness person not for geeks.

      I am currently building something like this, but more in line with what a geek would want. the full description can be found here. http://billiau.net/coffee_break/Adrian/fullbody.ht ml

      --
      conformity is the refuge of the unimaginitive
  10. I'll be excited when.. by Anonymous+Cowdog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm looking forward to the day when these kind of personal area networks forward packets for each other in a store-and-forward system. Send email from here to there, bouncing off the jackets of a bunch of geeks you don't know. The packets are stored until a node one step closer to the destination is detected, then they are forwarded.

    1. Re:I'll be excited when.. by alatesystems · · Score: 1

      When would those geeks (including me) be outside walking around to forward packets?

      Oh nevermind, I forgot a Computer Show is coming in early November :) /me burns Karma on that one

    2. Re:I'll be excited when.. by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a great idea, but how do you know if someone is closer? Regular email servers don't move around - so they know where all the other servers are. That's not the same with people...

    3. Re:I'll be excited when.. by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Same principles as cell phones or community wireless.

      If everybody is a store-and-forward wireless node, obviously this works.

      Can you imagine the hacking fun?

      "Oooh, look at that blonde babe over there - I'll hack into her email server and change all the headers to porno invites!"

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    4. Re:I'll be excited when.. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      But which pocket is for the packets?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    5. Re:I'll be excited when.. by burns210 · · Score: 1

      I would imagine some decent encryption(public key?) would be required.

      I would like to see a ipod-sized wifi/bluetooth 'router'... It plugs in or creates a PAN(personal area network) of all your stuff, but also acts as a router for when you want to email someone from your pda, your pda(default gateway/aceess points) knows to send email to your wifi box, that then does the encryption and auto-discovery of other wifi boxes, access points, etc.

      Each wifi box would carry packets for a set ammount of time, say, 60 minutes, so if Jane walks by and gets the packets for your email to Jon, and then walks off, Jane has 60 minutes to forward those packets etc. etc..

      Now things like routing protocols and whatnot might go to hell. How do you plan for multiple deliveries(Jane has a copy, including potentially anyone Jane walks by, plus yourself). While at the same time knowing that just because you send the packets to Jane doesn't mean that they will be forwarded at all(she could not walk by anyone else)...

      I think an idea similar to this would be amazing. Hell, add in a flash card for web cache... and an automated google/link list page of what your wifi box has cached and things could get really fun!

    6. Re:I'll be excited when.. by Anonymous+Cowdog · · Score: 1

      >Sounds like a great idea, but how do you know if someone is closer?

      Sounds like the question is serious, so I'll give a serious answer. The IETF is already working on RFPs for this. It's called "care-of addressing". Google is your etc. etc.

    7. Re:I'll be excited when.. by BillX · · Score: 1

      Do you really want that many geeks reading your email?

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    8. Re:I'll be excited when.. by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

    9. Re:I'll be excited when.. by thenerd · · Score: 1

      It would be pretty slow, why not just use mobile phones to either send text messages or connect to the internet?

      --
      The camels are coming. I'm in love.
    10. Re:I'll be excited when.. by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1
      Where do you walk around? NSA headquarters?

      If they can guess the recipient's private key or the AES256 session key, then they are not merely "geeks."

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    11. Re:I'll be excited when.. by sploxx · · Score: 1

      Hey, nice to see other people thinking about similar things! Only here on /. :)

      My idea I am pondering about is that many people get a store-and-forwarder box (the size of a cellular phone maybe), which has a
      - a message entry pad
      - a small LC display

      and contains

      - an infrared sending diode and
      - a receiver for IR remotes (TSOP17xx - really cheap ~50ct).
      - And a standard, low cost 8 bit uC (ATMega or similar) plus
      - additional SRAM (for storing and forwarding messages)

      The network links would be very slow (a few 100bps), but the advantage of using IR remote receivers over IRDA is that they are quite sensitive. Using a better IR diode, on can get tens of meters range with zero bit errors and with an error correcting code running on the nodes, on could certainly achieve even better ranges.
      The uC should be able to also handle strong encryption (because it has to be done only once for each message...)

      The technical difficulties probably lie in implementing an efficient routing protocol.

      Though, the biggest problems with such an approach probably are:
      1. the geek density is far too low in the population
      2. SMS and similar things are cheap enough for most people

      Maybe some people should gather and invent such a thing as a combined open-source/open-hardware project on sourceforge? I'm all for it! :-)

      BTW: I'm a bit disappointed about some of the other replies here discouraging the idea. Where is the enthusiasm?

  11. Is that an iPod strapped to your chest, by WarPresident · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or are you just a terrorist?

    If you're planning on flying, please, please, please don't be in front of me on line at the insecurity checkpoint with one of these chock full of gadgets.

    Looks neat, though.

    --
    Here come da fudge!
    1. Re:Is that an iPod strapped to your chest, by angrist · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, i've travelled several times with my iPod in my jacket just like this. ( headphones out the coat hook loop, remote hanging down the sleve at fingertip access, and iPod in the pocket)

      No trouble at all.

    2. Re:Is that an iPod strapped to your chest, by snooo53 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but the advantage of a jacket or trenchcoat is you can take it off to run through the x-ray scanner, rather than having to fumble around and empty out pockets.

      --
      The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
    3. Re:Is that an iPod strapped to your chest, by grahamdrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've had one of the Scott eVest 2.0s for at least two years now. Last time I went to the Smithsonian (American History) they actually had me empty out the pockets after puting it on the belt. Must have taken me about 8 minutes unwireing the headphones and all.

      Don't count on security just scanning the thing and letting you through. Chances are that if you DO have a lot of stuff in it (PDA, headphones, etc), the xray is just going to make them more suspicious.

      --
      // Dumps core here
  12. Nice. by Tracer_Bullet82 · · Score: 1

    I've always had issues with too much things in my pockets;keys,ipod,palm,handphone,etc..

    wearing cargo all the time ain't cool either.

    --


    Timang tinggi tinggi
    parang sudah asah
    alang alang mandi
    biar sampai basah
  13. Can you say tool? by dalamarian · · Score: 1

    Really people, I love tech.. but this is pure tool box.

    1. Re:Can you say tool? by iDrifter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Scott eVest v3.....$129.99
      Scott ePants.......$129.99 (est.)
      Hardware to fill pockets... in the thousand$
      Getting padded down by the law enforcement agency .... Priceless.

      --
      This message was done on 100% recycled electrons.
  14. POTUS! by blether · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the site:

    Rumor has it that the POTUS himself spotted one of these garments on a Secret Service Agent and insisted on one of his own - complete with a presidential seal.

    That says all you need to know.

    1. Re:POTUS! by Wizzy+Wig · · Score: 1
      From the site:

      Rumor has it that the POTUS himself spotted one of these garments on a Secret Service Agent and insisted on one of his own - complete with a presidential seal.

      My BS meter went off on that one. The Secret Service isn't likely to allow "non-issue" gear with all of the other stuff they gotta be concerned with, like where to stow the Uzi and still look non-chalant... Take note... in contrast to his predecessor, this prez is rarely, if ever, seen wearing the presidential seal on his clothing. Not taking a partisan side here so can the flames... I just watch the news a lot.

    2. Re:POTUS! by Rescate · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't believe it either--if he really had one of these jackets, he could have run the wires better than this.

  15. Go go Gadget by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    All of these can fit into your pocket, but I don't even see why you need all of that. But I don't have an IPod and I guess I never take any equipment like this with me, a camera maybe sometimes. A small cell phone on the other hand is always with me and the wallet too. Rather than that... what, a key chain?

    Maybe the pockets in the clothing are not good enough, maybe pockets in our bodies can be looked at (no matter how discussting that sounds :/ Go go gadget photocamera - and it comes out of your head or your chest? this is horrible. The pens can come out of your ass I suppose. Ouch, I have to stop this.

  16. FBI Pants by Nikkos · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those looking for good quality and style, do a search for 5.11 FBI pants on Google.

    They're a cross between normal kahkis and cargo pants, and they are very comfortable to wear.

    1. Re:FBI Pants by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if 100% cotton will survive that long. I've had good experience with Tilley Endurables which are a cotton/polyester blend. (The zipper packed it in after years on one pair. They replaced it free according to their guarantee.) Pricey, but they last. I prefer the shorts, which usually have more pockets.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:FBI Pants by Ophelan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Great pants; They're made be a company by the name of Royal Robins, and were originally intended for climbers.

      http://www.royalrobbins.com/
      http://www.511tactical.com/

  17. increased risk of cancer ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I wonder if the rate of cancer in geeks and nerds will go up drastically as the result of all the radiation that these gadgets give off.. especially when carrying so many so close to the body at all times..

  18. PAN-handle. by purduephotog · · Score: 2, Funny

    So when a tech guy gets laid off from the IT dept after being outsourced to India and is begging for money on the street, is his Personal Area Network - handling legal?

  19. And your gf says Is that by Timesprout · · Score: 3, Funny

    Your mobile ?

    Your Sat phone?

    Your PDA?

    Your iPod?

    Your USB key fob?


    Oh... so you _are_ happy to see me then

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:And your gf says Is that by Faustust · · Score: 2, Funny


      What are you talking about?

      All nerds are happy to see their compu ... girlfriend.

  20. Khaki is Stylish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khaki is usually the bare minimum you can wear in a business setting. The sportcoat in the picture looks like something you could buy for $5 at a thrift store. What's so wrong with carrying your stuff in a nice bag or briefcase?

  21. One of these suits me just fine... by MsGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mine has a "night camo" (various shades of blue+black) pattern, but otherwise it's just like this:

    http://www.greatoutdoorsdepot.com/apparel-vest-saf ari-black.html

    Mine was also cheaper because I got it from my local Army/Navy Surplus store rather than from an overpriced online vendor.

    Wearing one of these spares me the need to bring along a purse or a fannypack or backpack or whatever. I wouldn't trust a laptop to the back pocket, but I certainly trust everything else I haul around to this kind of vest.

    The only thing is that people ask me for press credentials a lot when I wear it...

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  22. given /.'s demographics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe it should be, "Is that an iPod in your pants, or did you forget to chew your sandwich."

  23. The true technological solution - by wasted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wouldn't the simpler solution be to make one multipurpose gadget instead of clothing to carry a lot of single purpose gadgets? Of course, that solution probably won't come from a clothing manufacturer.

    1. Re:The true technological solution - by Taladar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Chances are good this single multipurpose gadget would then be too big to fit into any of the pockets of normal clothes. In addition these would lead to the "one function breaks - have to buy completely new multipurpose gadget" problem

  24. Fabric contraceptive by boringgit · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine the scene - you have been out avter work for a few drinks, met up with a lovely lady (guy - whatever your taste). Things are going well, you are back at her place...

    Passions are rising, you are ripping off each others clothes, then you realise that she is just about to hurl your trousers (pants), containing a months paycheck worth of kit across the room.

    I have as many gadgets as the next geek, but by putting them in a bag I get to rip of my clothes with wanton abandon! (not that I get the chance as often as I would like!)

    1. Re:Fabric contraceptive by Justin205 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You think anyone who has one of these has the chance that their clothes will be ripped off?

      Ok, so maybe in a stripsearch...

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
    2. Re:Fabric contraceptive by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      Don't you know what you do when the woman hurls your trousers?

      You sue her, of course. For the first month's child support.

    3. Re:Fabric contraceptive by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      I forget the movie where a male and female secret service agents were tearing each other's clothes off and all these guns, radios, knives, etc. were hitting the floor. I think it was a Clint Eastwood movie.

    4. Re:Fabric contraceptive by Dasein · · Score: 1

      In the Line of Fire. Eastwood and Rene Russo. Don't ask me why I remember it's not like I have a secret thing for Rene or anything.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107206/
      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0155267/

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
    5. Re:Fabric contraceptive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was also a scene in one of the Police Acedemy movies I think.

  25. This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scottevest has been around for ages.

    Have you seen the game on their website? You play President Bush, and you fire missiles at Saddam and Osama.

    Their spokeswoman person was in Playboy, I believe.

  26. President Bush has a gadget suit!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Appearantly President Bush is one of the first ones to wear and advocate such a suit:

    http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/29/bul ge /

  27. The last thing I need... by GreenPenInc · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... is a network in my, *ahem*, "Personal Area".

    1. Re:The last thing I need... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sing it with me:

      There's a LAN party in my pants and I want you all to cum. . . . Humiliation!

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  28. Only the Beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I went to a focus group where they asked our opinions on the following products:
    • Multi-pocket pants, like those in the article
    • iPod pants/shorts, with internal wires, ports, and controls built into the material.
    • Recharging jacket with more wiring, power ports, and small solar panels on shoulder to recharge all of your accessories.
    • Self-cleaning clothes. Some how, these things clean themselves overnight, so you pack less on business trips.
    • everything-resistant clothes. Water resistant, dirt-resistant, insect-repellant and "wisks away moisture"
  29. Of course, but by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

    real geeks spend all that real money from their real jobs on other real technology and wear only vendor and logo wear to work and have a huge collection of 'collector items' of companies that no longer exist.

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  30. support the convergence of tech gadgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wear a pair of jeans or normal pants with just 2 pockets on the front and let's hope tech companies will innovate and produce gadgets that truly combine all-in-one functionality. Why should I have to buy a funky coat to hold my cell phone and my ipod and all the other junk. Why can't someone make a cell phone with mp3 playing capabilities?

    1. Re:support the convergence of tech gadgets by syrinje · · Score: 1
      sony k7000i. plays mp3. initial apprehensiveness turned into pure love after a single day of twiddling around with it.
      guess what the catch is - yup - storage! Only 40 MB - too much for photos (from the built-in camera) plus ringtones, too little for music. There are rumoursthough that the next version will accomodate a memory stick......

      right now the only useful thing about the mp3 playing is that I can get the old british post office public telephone ringtone for free.

      --
      See that long UID - that's what you get for lurking too long
    2. Re:support the convergence of tech gadgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's why:

      1. Because it sucks
      2. You get an ipod to impress chicks, you get an overfeatured phone if you are a chick.
      3. Lack of capacity and enormous size would make it poor at both functions.
      4. Profit!!!

    3. Re:support the convergence of tech gadgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out the Sony Ericsson S700i, Same platform as the K700i but a nifty swivel form factor and a Memory Stick Duo Slot. http://www.sonyericsson.com/product/s700/

    4. Re:support the convergence of tech gadgets by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1
      Why can't someone make a cell phone with mp3 playing capabilities?
      Phone + PDA convergence made sense. Phone + music player does not, at least with current storage technology.

      The problem is that a music player needs many gigabytes of storage. Currently, you just can't get a 100 gig drive that is small enough to not make a phone seem bulky. Maybe in a few years...

      Then there are power issues. Music players use energy much faster than phones (unless you're talking on the phone all the time). So it would need a bigger battery. Fine a new way to store concentrated energy, and maybe you'll be on to a good idea. But, again, the technology just isn't here yet.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  31. Motorcycle Jacket by prog-guru · · Score: 1

    The classic leather motorcycle jacket has always worked for me, cell in either side pocket, pager in lower front outside pocket, and a PDA in the inside pocket.

    Plus it looks indimidating, though I would like something a little more low key sometimes.

    --

    chris@xanadu:~$ whatis /.
    /.: nothing appropriate.

    1. Re:Motorcycle Jacket by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but some of us are skinny pale guys with glasses (I certainly am). If we tried to wear a motorcycle jacket we'd just look pathetic, not intimidating!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  32. Now all we need... by marktaw.com · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is something to convert the kinetic energy we generate by walking into electricity so we can charge on the go. Instead of air pockets in our shoes, why not little springs and generators?

    Oh wait, nerds don't walk anywhere except to the snack machine. Well, I guess that's good enough because they probably have docking stations for all their goodies at any place they plan to be stationed for more than 8 hours.

  33. If you'd like the same sort of thing as a t-shirt by throughthewire · · Score: 3, Insightful
    One of my friends posted a link to a review of Koyono's BlackCoat-T in her blog this morning. $29 or 5 for $125.

    Personally, the older I get, the less crap I want to carry around with me - much less on me. I stopped wearing a watch years ago. One really good, small PDA/cell phone is all I want or need - and I don't want to have to work to dig the thing out from some hidden pocket.

  34. eholster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The e-holster is another good alternative: http://www.eholster.com/. Not to be worn in airports however.

  35. Or you could just do it the cheap way by ShatteredDream · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You could just wear cargo pants. Plenty of pockets for your gadgets and a good pair costs no more than $20.

    1. Re:Or you could just do it the cheap way by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      The problem with wearing cargo pants all the time is that you have to eventually take htem off and wash them. That, and when a person sits down, it's often that part of the cargo pant pocket gets 'under' the leg, and you can potentially crack/bend anything in those pockets. That, and when walking/running anything hefty in a pocket sends to bang about in a fairly uncomfortable manner.

      Don't get me wrong: cargo pants rock. They're just not practical for gadgets.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  36. Personal area network? by JakiChan · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's hardly a new term, since that's also used in describing Bluetooth networks (i.e. your phone, PDA, and headset all talking wirelessly). And personally, I like the idea of this stuff all talking wirelessly anyway.

    However, given how fat I am, my Personal Area Network is probably a Wide Area Network....

    --
    "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
    1. Re:Personal area network? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yo' momma so fat, her Personal Area Network needs a retransmitter!

  37. Yeah, and another good thing about it by Duke+Machesne · · Score: 2, Funny

    You can put your weed in there.

    1. Re:Yeah, and another good thing about it by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      well, actually, there is a pocket designed to keep your 12 oz Beverage upright via velcro... works well too

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  38. Finally! by farnerup · · Score: 1

    Funerals are always so depressing without my trusty iPod.

  39. I want a.... by mr.+methane · · Score: 2

    .... Broadcast Enabled Digital Personal Area Network.

  40. Am I the only one ... by kiljoy001 · · Score: 1

    that read that as "soviet" clothing ?

    1. Re:Am I the only one ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

  41. Disclaimer by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1

    Not recommended for use in airports, or during public debate forums.

  42. don't walk around at night in one of these by slashdime · · Score: 1

    In the future, if you get mugged, you're walking home naked.

  43. Integrated tunnel System? by kalel666 · · Score: 1

    "The clothing includes an integrated tunnel system which allows you to hide all the wires affiliated with your devices"

    Can't you picture the marketing guys planning their advertising?

    PHB: Integrated tunnel system? That'll never sell. We need something with a catchy name. Any ideas?

    Drone 2: Hmmmm... how about the "uRanus system"?

    PHB: (Staring at drone 2): You're fired.

    --
    I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS
  44. Level 1 Key Card by bbtom · · Score: 1

    Lower yourself down from the vent shaft to meet the DARPA Chief, Donald Anderson. After a few minutes of discussion, the Chief dies. Fortunately, he gives you his keycard which opens Level 1 doors. When equipped it works through your body's Personal Area Network.

    I'm thinking the guys who designed this jacket are big time MGS fans. But, while we are on clothing, I'm thinking that the stealth suit would kick the ass of SCOTTeVEST's stuff any day of the week. Maybe that and a nice Bandana. Mmm. Infinite ammo.

    --
    catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
  45. I prefer my messenger bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep everything in it, cell phone, mp3 player, pda, it even has room for my laptop if I wanted to bring it along as well. Aside from gadgets, I also keep my wallet, change, and even a book or two there. Not only was it inexpensive, but I dont have to transfer everything to a new pair of kahkis everytime I change. Wanna go out in something with no pockets, no problem!

  46. Batbelt is where it's at.. by xtal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I hate having stuff in my pockets. It seems to be a function of age, but I really loathe having my pants and jacket looking weighed down. I want to have my jacket modified so it has some combat-style webbing hidden in it; this is how you can carry a lot of things without weighing down the coat itself. That stops you and the coat from looking stupid. The tailoring might run you a few dollars though.

    However, long time ago I realized the best solution is to trust in the almighty batbelt. The trick is just to keep the batman factor as low as possible. A nice coat will cover everything. I have a backpack for the rest.

    --
    ..don't panic
  47. This gives a completely new meaning to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the phrase "digitally enhanced camel toe"...

  48. look at the page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it now says:
    >>WE LOVE OYU SLASHDOT!!! :)

    obviously they like being slashdotted :)

    best marketing on the net.

  49. An anorak for anoraks by Tino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I could use a jacket with pockets better suited to what I'm going to put in them, but this thing -- in all its versions -- is just too ugly for me to wear.

    I'd like to see the pockets and 'personal network' features in a jacket that doesn't look so high-tech and awful. The whole point of getting all that garbage off your belt and eliminating the pocket-bulges is to look like less of a goober, after all.

  50. Watch out at the airport security lines by slashname3 · · Score: 1

    This is going to be great. You gear up for a business trip, strapping on all you gear running wires all over your body. Get to the air port and you have to strip down to almost nothing to get through security or spend time with the TSA waving wands up and down your body.

    So you get through security (maybe without the free body cavity search, maybe not) and you get to the plane and get a seat. Your sitting there listening to music and pull out a keyboard to use with the screen built into your glasses and the passenger notices all these wires criss crossing your body. As the flight gets ready to take off you start turning all your electronics off, cell phone, laptop, ipod, SAT phone, GPS, PDA. The eyes of the passenger next to you go wide with fear thinking you are preparing to set off a bomb. The suspicious passenger rings the flight attendant worried you have a bomb hidden on your person (just what are all those bulges and wires?). The plane taxies back to the gate and you are taken off for further questioning. And a guarantted body cavity search this time even if you got one before.

    Yeah, this stuff is really going to "take off". :)

  51. Why would you bring so much stuff at a wedding?! by mr_angry · · Score: 1

    I read the article. Well, half read it then i was pissed enough. This guy is a dork. Let's suppose i go to the wedding of my friend. I shouldn't stay in the corner playing with my pda, listening to my ipod and talking on my cellphone. Of those 3, i had a pda until it got destroyed in an accident (which i survived, luckily for me). I mean why would you bring 2000$ of electronic crap at a wedding. Better tell your friend you won't go there instead of messing around all day long with the gadgets in everyone's face.

    And what the fuck is wrong with so-called sport clothes ?! That coat in the article isn't sport at all. Yeah check me out i'm gonna pull ollies on my skate while dressed as a businessman. Well i don't have a skate 'cause i'd die trying to ride it but you get the idea...

    --
    100% of statistics are wrong.
  52. She canno' take much more of this, keptain! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the vest for the true scottie fan.

  53. Possibly the greatest thing about the tunnel ... by writermike · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you guys but I need help down there. That's why I and Kenny Loggins stuff our pants.

    Now, with this integrated tunnel system, the next time I go out I can stuff a very long one and it'll snake all around me.

    Wait til they get a load of me now!

    m

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
  54. Take a hint from the ultimate gadget sport by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Flyfishing.

    There is absolutely no gadget activity that comes anywhere near flyfishing in the amount of gadgetry involved. Yet, flyfishermen are able to pack everything into a fishing vest. I reckon a fishing vest would be a fine way to organise all those PDAs, MP3s etc. Suggest washing before use on the subway though.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  55. What about us grrrls? by timelady · · Score: 1

    I have a zaurus, phone, usb stick (on key ring), wallet, and laptop. My beloved Debian bag didnt fit my laptop, Linux Conf Au bag did, but is fiddly to get otehr stuff. So now I have a laptop backpack that just looks like a normal backpack. With hal inside (the laptop), it still has room for my toys AND the nappies for the toddler geeks. I also have a nice bag from Oxfam shop, that fits all toys and nappies and stuff but is small goddness, without being handbaggy. Hate handbags. But clothing - man, NEVER enough pockets on our stuff!!!!

    --
    Nothing - well thats something.
    1. Re:What about us grrrls? by echocharlie · · Score: 1

      I've read an article from a female editor of a tech magazine lamenting the same thing. Perhaps someone should start a company and put out a line of clothing for the tech-enabled women out there.

  56. TEC for women? It's called a purse! by rynthetyn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unlike men's clothing designers, who have largely ignored the need to tote around technology (leading to a market for TEC products), handbag designers have responded quite rapidly to the need to tote around massive quantities of technology.

    Most handbags sold today have specific compartments for phones, PDAs, pens, etc. About six years ago, before I went to college, I worked selling handbags at a big name department store, and even then, there were quite a few bags with specific cell phone pockets, because if nothing else in fashion is, handbag design is very much driven by consumer specifications.

    --
    Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
    1. Re:TEC for women? It's called a purse! by ThousandStars · · Score: 1

      Men carry backpacks, briefcases or messenger bags. A purse or something similar seeks a niche that I, and I suspect most men, don't need filled. If the gear is small -- wallet, keys and a cell phone -- it goes in the pocket. For anything larger, like a laptop, I'd rather have one of the bags mentioned. I think they're more practical than a purse.

  57. Re:Why would you bring so much stuff at a wedding? by rynthetyn · · Score: 1

    In the clothing industry, clothes like that are classed as sportswear. Don't ask me why, though my hunch is that it's because it's the sort of thing that rich upper crust types would think appropriate for such "sporting" events as yachting or golfing--i.e. appropriate clothes for a country club.

    --
    Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
  58. A Quick Tip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just use your doppleganger!

  59. fleece = bad by mk500 · · Score: 1

    What's up with all the fleece? Am I the only geek that is concerned about static electricity zapping all the components I'm always working on? A fleece jacket to put my expensive gadgets into just seems like a very bad idea.

  60. that all great and dandy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but my mother still won't read the article. How am i suppose to convince her to buy me clothes like that?

  61. OT, but why not add some geek jewelry? by DJ_Heatsink · · Score: 1

    ... of the non-functional sort, but do you know about this?it's a design company that ames all kinds of jewelry made from electronics.... the diskette handbag is pretty hot too.

    --
    -- _ music: http://www.quantazelle.com _ _ label: http://www.subVariant.com _ _ magazine: http://www.modsquare.com _
  62. News Advertisemet. Wow by statixz · · Score: 1

    I wonder how much did SCOTTeVEST pay /. for the advertisement to appear as a news item?

  63. Boobies if you are lucky! by orasio · · Score: 1

    Watch out for hidden gadgets in panties!!
    They can be dangerous for your rear end.