Slashdot Mirror


Simplest Ogg Streaming Clients for non-Unix Users?

Dr. Smeegee asks: "I recently set up an .ogg stream for beta testing, on a website chronicling my hometown's music scene in the 80's. I stream nothing but independent bands from the Evansville area. I chose IceCast using Ogg Vorbis for obvious reasons. The only problem is, I've been using ogg123 on BSD for so long, I didn't realize that streaming Ogg support is sketchy at best on the Windows and Mac platforms. Can anyone suggest good players? Or am I going to have to downgrade my sound and stream in .mp3?" "I have provided my potential users links to these applications that claim to play .ogg streams:

Zinf
VLC for Windows
OggDS plugin for Windows Media Player
Winamp 2.81
Whamb
MacAmp Lite, and the
Quicktime Plug-In

However, am still getting complaints of flaky behaviour not linked to the stream itself. One Mac OS X user in particular, using MacAmp, could play the stream, but the system kept a download dialog up the whole time! Most, however, complain that the applications flat won't play streams."

21 of 64 comments (clear)

  1. Winamp 5.05 by kyhwana · · Score: 4, Informative

    Winamp 5.05 plays ogg streams just fine..

    --
    My email addy? should be easy enough.
  2. About WinAmp 2.81 by SteWhite · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use WinAmp 2.81 to play OGG streams.

    The important thing with this one is to ensure you get the full version, not the lite one. The lite one doesn't have the necessary features.

  3. noXMMS. by Leffe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You could try porting noXMMS, a console port of XMMS with no links to X. I don't know how tricky that would be though. I'm pretty sure it supports OGG streams though.

    Otherwise Winamp is the obvious choice.

  4. JOrbis - Java Applet by EABinGA · · Score: 4, Informative

    Try JOrbis, the pure java Ogg Vorbis decoder as an applet.

  5. Re:RealPlayer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you MUST be different, try AAC, its lossless unlike ogg and gives better than cd quality by eliminating jitter.

    Not only that, my good man! It is well known that AAC decodes to pointier ones and rounder zeros than OGG, for a richer, smoother and creamier digital playback experience. True audiophiles use nothing less.

  6. Re:RealPlayer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    try AAC, its lossless unlike ogg

    Ogg can be lossless. You are mistaking Ogg for Vorbis.

  7. Re:RealPlayer? by JRIsidore · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you MUST be different, try AAC, its lossless unlike ogg and gives better than cd quality by eliminating jitter.

    Ah, nice, so I can finally get rid of that crappy quality of my CDs. Thanks man, gotta try that out!

    --
    :w!q
  8. The opposite of WINE? by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For instances like this where Linux has a good app, but Windows does not, could a WINE-like product be useful? I have a favourite Windows ad-filtering proxy that I've taken with me on my slow move to Linux. Perhaps a way to run Linux binaries on a Windows PC would be helpful to bridge a gap and even an aid to migration.

    1. Re:The opposite of WINE? by hey! · · Score: 2, Informative

      For instances like this where Linux has a good app, but Windows does not, could a WINE-like product be useful?

      It's called Cygwin.

      The typical ./configure, make sequence works for many Linux packages.

      However, it's not a solution for "drive by" internet users.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:The opposite of WINE? by jonadab · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agreed. In terms of _working_, cygwin is somewhat better than WINE (assuming
      you have the source of the app you want to run; it's not much good for running
      binaries, obviously). This is presumably because the POSIX API and stuff
      doesn't have to be reverse-engineered to be implemented.

      But as you say, neither WINE nor Cygwin is really appropriate for the hurried,
      "Just run this _now_ and don't bug me with setup" user. Some distros claim to
      have WINE pre-set-up so that running popular Windows apps is almost that easy,
      but in practice it usually doesn't work out that way -- and Cygwin doesn't
      even attempt that, AFAIK, because it is squarely aimed at an audience of tech
      users who know *nix but are on a Win32 platform for other reasons.

      I would think the solution for getting *nix apps running on Windows would in
      most cases be porting them over. Granted, this has to be done for each and
      every app, and end users can't do it... but the end results should be a lot
      better than with emulation. Using Gimp on Windows is a lot nicer than using
      a Windows app on Linux with WINE. Sure, the scrollbars are a bit funky (since
      Gimp uses GTK, not the native widgets), but that's minor.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    3. Re:The opposite of WINE? by amorsen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually it's called coLinux. Binary compatibility can be very useful.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  9. Java client by Frodo420024 · · Score: 2, Informative

    At Diamondway Teachings we use a simple Java client (don't remember which one) for the purpose. We're streaming Ogg, as it sounds LOTS better than MP3 at very low bitrates.

    --
    I'm in a Unix state of mind.
  10. VLC all the way by j0kkk3l · · Score: 2, Informative

    Streaming wirh vlc is really easy. Just follow the streaming howto pdf on their website. http://www.videolan.org
    there are even clients available for almost all platforms and you may also stream videos!

  11. Why are you doing it? by SteveX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you're doing it to advocate Ogg Vorbis then rock on. If you're doing it because you want people to listen to your stuff, then maybe you should consider that the audience is used to mp3 streaming and already has the tools to do that, and offer them an mp3 feed in addition.

  12. foobar2000 by Skuto · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://foobar2000.org

    Simple. Works.

    The author is the original author of the Winamp Vorbis support...

  13. ask your users what they want by truffle · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Why not ask both the people who listen to your stream what format they'd like the music in?

    --

    ---
    I support spreading santorum
  14. Re:RealPlayer? by Paladin128 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    AAC has a lossless mode, but the default is NOT lossless. I'm good friends with a Dolby engineer that worked for the company while they developed AAC. One internal thing that they didn't want to let out is that AAC is better in every way than Dolby Digital AC3.

    Besides, for good lossless, we have Ogg FLAC.

    As far as the frame jitter issue goes, any decent CD player that has a 16-frame buffer (a whole whopping 256 bytes -- could be cache on the D/A chip) could effectively eliminate jitter. Period. In modern CD-players, it's not an issue, regardless of what your friendly neighborhood audio store will say. Same with "greening" cd's. It's psuedoscience that sounds feasible, but in reality is a load of crap.

    --
    Lex orandi, lex credendi.
  15. Foobar 2000 by EvilIdler · · Score: 2, Informative

    You could try Foobar 2000 for Windows.
    I haven't tried any Ogg/Vorbis streaming with it, but please post
    some links if you're not afraid of the hordes ;)

    1. Re:Foobar 2000 by Dr.+Smack+PhD · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use foobar to listen to OGG streams and it works quite well. If you are forced to stream from a Windows box, you can also use foobar to complete this task as well via the magic of plugins. Oddsock has pretty much everything you'd need to complete this portion of the task (for which the poster did not request, but someone else might want).

  16. Why not both by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Providing a pre-recorded stream in more than one lossy format would require twice as much storage on the server. Providing a live stream in more than one lossy format would require twice as much computing power. Some people can't afford to rent that.

  17. Almost Certainly Not! by parvenu74 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Any /. reader could figure out how to get their computer to play any streaming format ever made, but that doesn't do anything for folks not as "enlightened" / "have more of a life" than us. While OGG is certainly a very nice format, if the basic premise of the streaming is to provide a service of interest to mainly non-technical folks -- like those *primarily* into 80's music -- then you might have to consider the possibility of not using the *coolest* format and opt instead for the most *available* format.