Slashdot Mirror


IBM Retakes Fastest Supercomputer Title

dshaw858 writes "BBC News reports that IBM has unveiled its new Blue Gene/L machine. The Blue Gene project already has two of the top ten supercomputers in the world. Big news for IBM! I wonder what great things they can calculate in just seconds now... maybe I should get a stronger PGP key."

56 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. Don't worry by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "IBM and its partners are currently exploring a growing list of applications including hydrodynamics, quantum chemistry, molecular dynamics, climate modeling and financial modeling."

    So no PGP key cracking. At least officially.

    I wonder how the Fold@Home total CPU power compare to this in terms of percentage?

    1. Re:Don't worry by Coryoth · · Score: 5, Informative

      So no PGP key cracking. At least officially.

      You really need something more than just a really fast/powerful computer to do PGP cracking. You're going to need something that can help you get your fingernails under the problem, because even this machine couldn't brute force PGP keys. There has been some papers written on theoretical weaknesses in RSA that, given a custom built machine, could be exploited. This is not a custom built RSA cracker. It may have enough raw power to make up for that of course, and that means you might manage 1024 bit RSA cracking if you are determined. Unfortunately any sane PGP/GPG users are using Diffie-Hellman/El-Gamal rather than RSA as their public key system, and for now there aren't any similar attacks for the discrete log problem as there are for factoring.

      Your paranoia is misplaced. You should be worried that the NSA has come up with a serious break in RSA and Diffie-Hellman schemes that let them be cracked by a nice ordinary supercomputer, rather than worried about computer power overtaking key size. Most key sizes are chosen to have a fairly long lifespan even with massive increases in computing power. You aren't going to brute force 128bit symmetric systems any time soon, no matter how much computing power you stack up against it. No, the fear is in breaks to the encryption scheme.

      Jedidiah.

    2. Re:Don't worry by JPriest · · Score: 5, Funny

      If people want your key so bad they will build a supercomputer this big to crack it, you have plenty other things to worry about.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    3. Re:Don't worry by metlin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Financial Modelling _is_ a big thing. I've worked on modelling stock and economic data using game theory and various analytic methods -- it's not as simple as that.

      There's a lot of patterns, and a hell lot of data processing to be do.

      However, that said, financial data modelling is not something which I think can be cracked using brute-force power. Although there has been a lot of fundamental progress in terms of using OR and GT algorithms and the like, it hasn't really had that "big breakthrough" to fundamentally determine the basis of financial data and market behaviour, and perhaps we never will.

      Ofcourse, as always hope springs eternal - but that would also make markets a whole lot deterministic and bring about some serious differences in the way business is done.

    4. Re:Don't worry by Duncan3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder how the Fold@Home total CPU power compare to this in terms of percentage?

      Folding@home has almost 3x the FLOPS, but we're all on the same side here. Slightly different problems can be tackled when you have local bandwidth.

      Also keep in mind that Folding@home is not one project, but dozens of projects sharing the same CPU pool.

      Years to go before we figure out how folding really happens...

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    5. Re:Don't worry by Coryoth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Aren't Diffie-Hellman and El Gamal just key exchange methods? I didn't know they had anything to do with the encryption itself...

      Diffie-Hellman is just key exchange, El-Gamal is effectively using Diffie-Hellman style operations for encryption. The important thing to remember is that PGP/GPG only uses the public key aspect for key exchange. The message itself in encrypted with a symmetric cipher scheme, and the public key is simply used to exchange the one time key for the symmetric cipher for that particular message.

      Jedidiah.

    6. Re:Don't worry by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Good point.

      What would you do - sink a few hundred million in building a supercomputer to crack some guy's PGP key, or kidnap him, hold a gun to his head and ask for the passphrase?

      You'd build the computer if it was imperative that the guy not know you'd cracked his encryption, or if you wanted to do it on a large scale. If it's just one or two guys, and secrecy isn't necessarily an issue, there are other ways...

    7. Re:Don't worry by Gil-galad55 · · Score: 4, Funny
      As my number theory prof once famously said, "There are easier ways of finding out secrets than factoring large primes."

      Well, I thought it was funny!

      --

      To follow knowledge like a sinking star, / Beyond the utmost bound of human thought. ("Ulysses", Tennyson)

    8. Re:Don't worry by fatphil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How can something that says "this machine couldn't brute force PGP keys." and "that means you might manage 1024 bit RSA cracking if you are determined" get moderated to +5?

      You're gibbering, sir. You say one thing and then the opposite.

      No-one "brute forces" PGP keys, that's not how you crack them. Exactly how you crack them depends on what the underlying algorithm is, it's either GNFS factoring or discrete logarithm, but _neither_ is brute force. So your first point is wrong.

      With current algorithms, 1024 bits is completely out of reach. The algorithms are mostly "embarassingly parallel", and therefore there's little gain from a tighty-coupled supercomputer (except at the LA stage at the end, but that's a fraction of the total workload). So this machine is no greater than the sum of its parts (i.e. several thousand high speed processors). Such a setup cannot crack 1024-bit keys. So your second point is wrong.

      FP.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  2. Bah by zaxios · · Score: 4, Funny

    IBM Retakes Fastest Supercomputer Title

    If their supercomputers really were that fast, they would have taken the title back earlier.

  3. Uh oh by paul248 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, IBM is taking the "Fastest Supercomputer" title away from NEC's Earth Simulator. How can NEC stand for this obvious theft of intellectual property? I sense a lawsuit brewing...

    1. Re:Uh oh by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, the RIAA are going to sue IBM for billions of dollars.

      They played one illicit mp3 at 70 teraflops.

      An RIAA spokesperson said "Playing a song at those astronomical speeds is highly illegal, it almost burnt our accountants fingers just counting the zeros!"

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Uh oh by fbform · · Score: 3, Funny

      They played one illicit mp3 at 70 teraflops.

      Knowing the RIAA's history, they'd probably claim that it was equivalent to playing millions of MP3s at consumer PC speeds. :-)

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
  4. "has two of the top ten supercomputers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ah...

    Must be those 2 guys I always see playing Quake with 1ms pings.

  5. Re:Again? by SonicBurst · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, that record was set by a previous machine. This one is just a prototype for a much larger/faster version, and still managed to hit 70 teraflops...

    --

    Geek used to be a four letter word. Now it's a six-figure one.
  6. Re:Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The machine has more nodes this time. It clocked in at over 70 teraflops, instead of the "mere" 36 that they had last time.

    They probably did this because NASA/SGI's Columbia machine did over 40 teraflops a few weeks ago and the Top 500 list is coming out this Monday. They wanted to be on top, I think. :)

  7. What about SGI? by enigma32 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I recently read that SGI was to be claiming the world's most powerful supercomputer record from the Earth Simluator...

    Does this mean that IBM leapfrogged SGI or does this mean that the SGI machine (to be built for NASA) wasn't all that exciting?

    http://www.sgi.com/features/2004/oct/columbia/

    1. Re:What about SGI? by LnxAddct · · Score: 2, Informative

      It means that the SGI announcement was of theoretical performance. In theory it is the fastest machine on earth... they are in the process of verifying that with tests right now. Once its proven you'll see the title taken by SGI again. Then the Earth Simulator will be 3rd on the list.
      Regards,
      steve

    2. Re:What about SGI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There will always be a competitor claiming the fastest supercomputer. It's always a game of leapfrog.

      The rankings used in supercomputing measure very specific benchmarks and have very specific deadlines.

      In this case, SGI has a computer reportedly faster than Blue Gene/L, but it is neither 1) in production by the deadline nor 2) independently verified results.

      Sure, they might do this, but by then the next supercomputer will shame SGI's new baby. Like I said, leapfrog.

      Rankings are all about a fairly arbitrary snapshot in time.

    3. Re:What about SGI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it just means that IBM (this time, at least) are full of PR-shit. The supercomputer they're talking about has one big difference from NASA's new system - the IBM box hasn't even left development yet, whereas the SGI system has been shipped and installed at a paying customer's site.

      Need proof? Here's one way you could go about getting it:

      (you) Hi IBM, I'm thinking of buying a BlueGene system for my lab, but I'm wondering - what operating system can I install on it?
      (IBM) It runs Linux!
      (you) But I looked carefully through the Linux source code, and couldn't find any mention of BlueGene systems. Are you sure it'll work?
      (IBM) Actually, you need to use our modified version of Linux.
      (you) Oh okay, no problem. Where can I get the source?

      At this point, the IBM sales rep's head will implode as he realises he has only two options: he can either stall (and the longer he stalls, the more it looks like he might be violating the GPL!), or he can admit the truth: the operating system doesn't _actually_ exist yet in any sort of finished form yet.

      On the other hand, SGI's version of Linux that runs on the 256-way Altix BX2 systems is a free download, as it should be. Start here.

      Hope this helps! Your post does raise the interesting question of where the Top500 group (or benchmarking people more generally) should drawn the line: it's nice to know about cutting edge machines, which may even be "one of a kind" installations, but somehow it's not so helpful when companies announce performance results of things they haven't even finished building it. It would not be out of the realms of possibility that the final BlueGene machine shares little (or nothing) in common with the machine they're talking about today, which would mean that this PR is basically nothing but a fairly baseless grab at mindshare.

  8. How 'bout by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder what great things they can calculate in just seconds now...

    How 'bout this? 1,000,000! It tatkes pretty long on my P3.

    --
    What?
  9. Chaos Theory... by oneiron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They really need to get these things crackin on chaos theory... How many inhabited planets equals one amino acid chain? What are our odds of hitting the protein jackpot? You know?

    1. Re:Chaos Theory... by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They really need to get these things crackin on chaos theory... How many inhabited planets equals one amino acid chain? What are our odds of hitting the protein jackpot? You know?

      Ah, Chaos Theory possibly the most widely popularised, yet least widely understood areas of mathematics ever. Exactly how is Chaos Theory going to help in counting extrasolar planets, or calculating probabilities? You need to actually have some understanding of the system before you can hope to actually apply any dynamical system theory to it at all. Presently, I don't think we do understand exactly how random chemicals manage to form proteins, and self replicating chemicals. I don't see how a fast computer and a fueld of math largely irrelevant to the subject at hand is going to help.

      Jedidiah.

    2. Re:Chaos Theory... by nwbvt · · Score: 4, Funny
      "I know what Chaos Theory is."

      No you don't. Put down the joint before you hurt someone.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  10. Yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    But can it cook me dinner yet? Seriously how much f***ing computer power do we need to bake brownies? I can't wait to throw out my girlfriend 1.0 once they finally come up with one that doesn't put up a inpenetrable firewall in bed.

  11. Appliccations by RealProgrammer · · Score: 5, Funny
    They meant hydrodynamics, financial modeling, etc. But no mention at all of how to combat spurious lawsuits.

    In an apparent first for /. today, mo mention of robots, either.

    This is OT, but I never noticed it before - the following HTML works here:

    link to slashdot:
    <a href="/.">/.</a>
    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:Appliccations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative


      That html works anywhere, its an absolute path on the current server (slashdot.org) the path is /. which expands to http://slashdot.org/. and the . is either removed by your browser or redirected by the webserver to http://slashdot.org/ or http://slashdot.org/./ (which is of course, the same as http://slashdot.org/)

  12. Yes, again. But... by Thu25245 · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...this time, it's from NASA. http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/nasa_super computer_040809.html

    There's been a lot of turnover recently. For those of you keeping track at home, it's now:

    IBM BlueGene/L (70.7 teraflops, up from36 in your article)

    (?) NEC SX-8 (Not yet installed anywhere; estimated 58.5)

    NASA/SGI Columbia (42.7)

    NEC Earth Simulator (35.9)

  13. Just remember by Raul654 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't mess with people who measure their server power in acres. :p

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:Just remember by mog007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can your TI read punch-cards? I THINK NOT!

  14. Re:Oh, this is so great by HBI · · Score: 4, Informative

    The parent poster is referring to this book, which was from about three years ago.

    I have read it. It's fundamentally a hatchet job. IBM was the prime supplier of Hollerith punched card machines worldwide, whether they were sorters or keypunch machines or whatever. The fact that they supplied them to the Nazis was used to create a conspiracy whereby IBM favored the extermination of Jews.

    The book appeared to be angling to tarnish Thomas J. Watson, the founder of IBM, primarily, rather than the modern company.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  15. The future of patent law has just struck me by zaxios · · Score: 4, Funny

    This brings up an enticing possibility. What if Microsoft just patented "being first"? Wouldn't that get rid of all the prior art rubbish they have to cope with with their other patents? I mean, if someone showed prior art for "feline flatulence" or whatever else is developing in Bill Gates' unfortunately windowless office, they would be infringing Microsoft's "being first" patent. This is it folks! The future!

  16. No key cracking by acidblood · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I recall reading on the RealWorldTech forums that these are highly specialized machines and particularly geared to floating point computation. As integer factorization, index calculus computation for discrete logarithm cracking, Pollard rho attacks for computing elliptic curve discrete logarithms, etc. are integer algorithms, crypto should be safe from this particular beast.

    And before anyone asks about symmetric/secret-key cryptosystems and hash functions, recall that these are also based on integer operations, so they're safe from the BlueGene as well.

    --

    Join the NFSNET. Our prime goal is making little numbers out of big ones. http://www.nfsnet.org/

    1. Re:No key cracking by fatphil · · Score: 2, Informative

      Anything that does arithmetic with integer maths can be done in FP too. My PIES project, like GIMPS and all the others, does integer maths almost entirely in the FPU units.

      Logical operations, yup, they're out of scope, but addition and multiplication, which are the heart of all the arithmetic algorithms you mention, can all be hived off to the FPU.

      Phil

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  17. 1000000! in hex by 3770 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did that in hex on a 486DX266 back in the day. It took approximately a month.

    I did it in hex because it was easier to write an efficient algorithm.

    And then I decided to write a program which would convert that huge resulting hex number to decimal.

    Only, that is when I realized that it would take more computational power to convert that number to decimal from hex, than to start from scratch and do it in decimal "natively".

    --
    The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
  18. Oh sure by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 2, Funny

    But can it play Doom3?

  19. Penguin Power. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Big news for IBM! I wonder what great things they can calculate in just seconds now..."

    Their sales of Linux.

  20. Guessing vs Gut feeling by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In this business, more than others, Gut feeling plays a leading role.

    Financial Data Modelling is a fine idea, but the whole thing boils down to human psyche - and unless someone comes up with a perfect AI - one that is one step ahead in psycho term than human, - be it GT or OR or whatever else, market trend is very much based on butterfly effect + herd instinct + stochastic resonance with a whole lot of chaos effects thrown in.

    That is why it's so dynamic !

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Guessing vs Gut feeling by metlin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Absolutely.

      That's why a lot of these systems use such things as socio-cultural influences, press and media data and the like.

      Unfortunately, the stock market is an area that is an ecosystem of its own -- preys and victims -- and therefore, predicting that is almost as hard as predicting human behaviour.

      And ofcourse, the only reason the economies _thrive_ is because of the chaos - everyone would like to believe that they can leverage it to make a profit for themselves. :-)

      And the best part is, everyone can, if they played their cards carefully enough.

    2. Re:Guessing vs Gut feeling by name773 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      an ecosystem of its own -- preys and victims...And the best part is, everyone can, if they played their cards carefully enough.
      how can everyone be making money? you already said there are preys & victims, and people have to be making that money from somewhere

  21. Speed of the computer? by Avuton+Olrich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, I'm confused, how can they figure out the speed so easily, when it's so hard to test the difference in speed between x86 AMDs & Intels? The other computers aren't faster at some things? Is it some special bench?

    1. Re:Speed of the computer? by vspazv · · Score: 4, Informative

      The test is called linpack.

      http://www.top500.org/lists/linpack.php

  22. I defeated your girlfriend's firewall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


    "...I can't wait to throw out my girlfriend 1.0 once they finally come up with one that doesn't put up a inpenetrable firewall in bed...."

    I defeated your girlfriend's firewall: I used her built-in back door.

  23. that we know of...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would rather get a list of top secret fatest computers in the world.

  24. Bluegen at over 70TF by a3217055 · · Score: 2

    Bluegen hitting over 70TF is a tremendous effort. There is nothing that comes near. And this is only 16 racks ( 25% of the total system) of the 64 rack system.
    Hats off to IBM for doing an outstanding job. And to the others in the race better luck next year.

    Also this runs ppc chips what else do you want an Itanium/Opteron what you want radiation burns.....

    PS I posted this on thursday night but the moronic slashdot editor threw it out. This is old news... Anyway... C'est la vie.

  25. Is it needed? by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The final machine will help scientists work out the safety, security and reliability requirements for the US's nuclear weapons stockpile, without the need for underground nuclear testing.

    Could someone explain to me why this task requires such a monster of a machine? And how can one address (as in write code for) the numerous unknowable factors that seems to be included in the problem that is to be solved? The definition just seems to be too abstract to be an actual solvable problem, and if it is solvable it would require an immense human resource contribution for the code it is to run. Wouldn't it be simpler to just stick those people into a room and not let them out until they've solved the problem?

    I've long wondered who comes up with the code they run on these 'pooters. Anyone who can offer some insight on the usual complexity of the code that is run/problems that are solved?

    --
    All rites reversed 2010
  26. Re:This begs the question: by whataboutMike · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As mentioned in this article http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/06/ 0511220&tid=127&tid=208&tid=10 computers have no problem beating humans at chess. What would really make news is if computers would start beating humans at Go. Then again, Go is much less about brute force and deep searching; and more about pattern recognition. Something that humans seen to have a monopoly on.

  27. Re:Quantum cracking algorithms? by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Indeed. Not so long ago I heard that a team had succesfully factorized 12 (into 4*3) using a quantum computer. (It was a 7 qubit 'puter) :)

    Quantum computer has a way to go, even by paranoid standards.

    --
    Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
  28. Too late by vile7707 · · Score: 2, Funny

    *snip*
    " maybe I should get a stronger PGP key."

    We've already calculated your next 250 pgp keys, and divined your future. Hint: avoid badgers.

  29. applications by photonic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Machine number one will go to Livermore, probably for doing some nuclear stuf. Number two will go to the Netherlands for the Lofar project. This is a 300 kilometer diameter radio telescope that observes at low frequencies (up to 250 MHz). It constists of thousands of small antennas spread across half the country. Their signals will be interferometrically combined to form the images (compare e.g. to the VLA). Blue Gene will be used to combine all the signals in real time, I believe the total bandwidth from the antennas is some terabyte/sec.

    --
    karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
  30. Re:Yes but does it run Linux like the SGI? by nchip · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes and no.

    The Linux-based host nodes manage user interaction functions, while the Linux-based service nodes provide control and monitoring capabilities.

    Linux is also used in I/O nodes, which provide a gigabit Ethernet connection to the outside world for each group of 64 compute nodes, or every 128 processors. Thus, the full BlueGene/L system will have 1024 I/O nodes, which essentially form a Linux cluster.

    The actual compute nodes -- the 128,000 processors -- do not run Linux, but instead run a very simple operating system written from scratch by the Project's scientists.

    --
    signatures pending - ansa@kos.to - (dont mail there)
  31. Climate modeling by LarsWestergren · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, so of the three fastest computers in the world, one is almost exclusively dedicated to environmental climate models, and the other two have it as part of their tasks.

    Perhaps this could bury the arguments on Slashdot that there is no hard data or serious research about global warming.

    --

    Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    1. Re:Climate modeling by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Playing devil's advocate:

      Just because people are running a bunch of simulations on climate change doesn't mean the results are useful. If people were running a bunch of simulations on the existence of dragons and fairies, I would hardly expect reasoning people to use that as evidence that they're real.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    2. Re:Climate modeling by hawkeye · · Score: 2, Informative

      While I'm certainly an advocate of playing it safe with the environment, I do, however, understand the point(s) of those that don't subscribe to the global warming theory.

      In truth, we don't have enough data, from our past, to understand whether our climatic changes are just brief glitches or undeniable trends.

      --
      "...The smart and lazy ones I make my commanders." - Erwin Rommel
  32. Re:Does Moore principle apply to quantum computing by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Currently, it isn't even a chip (or at least, last I heard). It was (a lot of) molekyles with 7 "mutable" spots (I think it was rotation). The state was read using NMR spectroscopy).

    It is about as close to a chip as a printing press to a photocopier ;-)

    --
    Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
  33. Re:More Power to the People by bhima · · Score: 2
    OK, I know you are just amusing yourself with a tired joke but you should have a look at IBM's Blue Gene site and read up on their networking stratagies (all three of them). It's really interesting and makes Beowulf clustering seem sort of... tired.

    That and it's really low power... somwhere in the powerpoint presentations they have a graphic showing the Blue Gene/L uses a little less power than the same volume of IBM thinkpads.

    Oh.. and given the costs involved I think idle time will wind up being sort of low.

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.