Slashdot Mirror


Earth Simulator, G5 Cluster Drop In 'Top 500' List

daveschroeder writes "The November Top 500 supercomputer list has been published at SC2004. Topping the charts is IBM and the US Department of Energy's 'BlueGene/L DD2' beta system, at 70.72 TFlops, followed by NASA's 'Columbia' at 51.87.TFlops. For the first time in several publications of this list, Japan's Earth Simulator is no longer in the number one slot, falling to third. Virginia Tech's 'System X' Xserve G5 cluster, while 20% faster than the original cluster that debuted at number 3 last November, has fallen to number 7 due to the new entries, but remains the fastest supercomputer at an academic institution. Here's an excellent cost comparison (Google cache) of the top machines ('System X' is significantly cheaper than anything else in the top 20, not to mention cheaper than many things far below it in performance)."

33 of 343 comments (clear)

  1. The Dept. of Energy by aztektum · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hear they're using it to convert heat into electricity for the rest of the government. Hence their name.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  2. Thanks for that post by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

    That was a close one... I was starting to worry that Apple might be dying again.

  3. hehehe, IBM knows how to play by BortQ · · Score: 3, Funny

    IIRC then IBM just came out with their entry very recently. Perhaps they know how to play supercomputer sniping. It's easy to learn on ebay.

    --

    A Multiplayer Strategy Game for Mac OS X, Windows, and Linux
  4. Funny MIPS by RealProgrammer · · Score: 3, Funny

    These numbers seem surreal, like thinking about Monopoly money. I'm sitting here at my old PII-300, analyzing the cost/power ratio of machines costing a mere $6M, or as much as $350M. This one cost, uh, nothing.

    On any one of those systems, you could emulate a Beowulf cluster of this one, and still have time to play Thermonuclear War.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  5. But.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    It doesn't matter. The brushed aluminum case makes it at LEAST 3 times faster.

  6. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Viruses are the new supercomputers.

  7. Earth Simulator has liberal bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Earth Simulator computed that global warming will cause major climate change in the next 50 years.

    Clearly it suffers from liberal bias.

  8. Re:super computations? by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 4, Funny

    They simulated the entire earth up until the creation of slashdot. Then everything suddenly ceased.

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  9. Why does slashdot keep posting these stories? by The+Pim · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is there some fantasy supercomping league I don't know about?

    --

    The evaluation of an action as 'practical' . . . depends on what it is that one wishes to practice.
  10. Re:Just imagine by BottleCup · · Score: 1, Funny

    It seems like every time there is a new supercomputer in a Slashdot headline, the first few responses are about running Doom 3 or some other FPS. Those computers are better off used for among other things to create predictive complex simulations like global weather, seismic activity, the global economy etc ... etc. Using such a beast for a simple FPS would be such a waste.

  11. It's still running by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 5, Funny

    > How much Earth was simulated?

    Well, I've noticed a vew glitches (disappearing keys, poor AI in girlfriends, crazy presidents in some countries, etc.), but I'd say most of the Earth has been running reasonably well.

  12. Re:Just imagine by mlk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Using such a beast for a simple FPS would be such a waste.
    So true, we should use a complex, awe-inspiring game, which will push the limits of any machine. I suggest Nethack.

    --
    Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  13. Not on the list by leapis · · Score: 3, Funny

    DB Error: connect failed

    Apparently, the top 500 list is not actually hosted on one of the top 500 machines.

  14. VT ongoing cost of ownership evaluation... by MacDork · · Score: 4, Funny

    200 pizzas a week. ;-)

    1. Re:VT ongoing cost of ownership evaluation... by LittleBigLui · · Score: 2, Funny

      You USians and your funny units... how much is that in Libraries-of-Congress?

      --
      Free as in mason.
  15. Re:Erm ... by BJH · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bagdes? We don't need no steenking bagdes!

  16. Re:What is with the Apple fan-boyism? by MacDork · · Score: 4, Funny
    Ok, So the big Mac is still #7. That's great, but there are 6 wonderfull computers that have all sorts of great technology that your completely ignoring because Apple wets your pants.

    Fine, I'm willing to talk about number 6. ;-)

  17. Re:Hmm by Ibanez · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well then, why not compare the earth? What other supercomputer has gotten closer to "42" than it?

  18. I'm still hanging in by serutan · · Score: 3, Funny

    My computer is number 44,286,551 and I'm gunning hard for position 44,286,550.

  19. Re:And we thought Macs were expensive by cbreaker · · Score: 3, Funny

    You only have to buy 1100 of them to get a discount.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  20. Re:EARTH TO MAC ZEALOTS: by kevingolding2001 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, but imagine a beowulf clus... Ummmm.. sorry, what was the question again?

  21. Re:two times less by jbarlow · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ok, this is just one of those things that bothers my proofreading brain. What exactly is "two times less" supposed to mean? Literally, it means that they should be shoving as much power back into the grid as these comparable systems. 'Cause "one time less" would be zero.

    Try "half as much." Damn, I hate grammar nazis like me.

  22. Re:cluster operating system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You're also not allowed to spell 'apparently' like that.

  23. Re:Hmm by flonker · · Score: 2, Funny

    Norton Antivirus: Fighting Back Against Skynet!

  24. Re:What i really like is by AusG4 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does anyone know what this guy is talking about? Who is the wise prince? What is happening?

    --
    bash-3.00$ uname -a
    SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
  25. Re:Just imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    which will push the limits of any machine

    Nethack on Longhorn!

  26. Re:Power architecture does well by kai.chan · · Score: 2, Funny

    5 of the 10 top machines use the Power archtecture, either the Power4 or PPC family.

    Coincidentally, my top machine use Microsoft Windows and it has a record of AlwaysFlops.

  27. Re:super computations? by roine · · Score: 3, Funny

    How much Earth was simulated?

    The closest they got was 41.9998645234, which is pretty good in my book.

  28. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    For not being sufficiently deferential to Apple.

  29. BDH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Beating the dead horse or what. Yes Apple fanboys we know about your super computer .. yes we know its cheaper than anything.

  30. We need a Steve Jobs Benchmark! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    How fast does it do a 500 pixel Gaussian Blur on a 300MB Photoshop file, convert it to CMYK and rotate it 22 degrees?

    (betcha it comes out #1!)

  31. Re:Not to mention that BG beats BigMac in flops/$ by Lars+T. · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since his point was PowerPC beats the crap out of x86 and Itanium, yeah, I'm convinced he will be disappointed it takes a PPC system to beat a PPC cluster.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  32. Re:Hmm by mjeppsen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow. Parent is modded "Insightful"? Incredible. I guess "+5 Funny" was disabled...