Slashdot Mirror


Video iPod Available... Sort of

Pirogoeth writes "The fine folks over at Engadget have figured out how to get your new iPod Photo to play movies. According to the article, you use Quicktime Pro to export the movie as thousands of individual frames which you export to the iPod, send the soundtrack to the iPod as well, then, if you haven't guessed by now, while playing the soundtrack, put the iPod into slideshow mode and use the scroll wheel to manually keep the frames in synch with the sound. Sound impossible? Here's a video (in mov or wmv) of the Episode III trailer in action..."

25 of 297 comments (clear)

  1. Ugh... by Chagatai · · Score: 5, Funny
    That is one ugly, ugly brute force hack, if I have ever seen one. It's so ugly it hurt my feelings.

    --
    --Chag
    1. Re:Ugh... by identity0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Look at the bright side. Now instead of looking fashonable with their white earphones, we'll get to see ipod-people looking ridiculous as they scroll furiously to keep their video in sync with the sound while walking down the street.

      It'll be beautiful, I tell you, especially if they walk into a lamp post while doing it.

  2. In other news... by Dominatus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scientists built a car today that doesn't require any fuel at all!!

    All you do is put the car in neutral, grab a buddy and stand behind the car. Then, placing your hands on the rear bumper...push. Scientists believe it's such a simple process we may all be getting around in these miracle cars any day now!

    1. Re:In other news... by rrkap · · Score: 4, Funny

      Scientists built a car today that doesn't require any fuel at all!!

      All you do is put the car in neutral, grab a buddy and stand behind the car. Then, placing your hands on the rear bumper...push. Scientists believe it's such a simple process we may all be getting around in these miracle cars any day now!/

      There is, however, considerable debate among scientists weather this cooperative mode of operation is superior to the single operator mode in which the user places his feet through a hole in the floor and runs really fast that has been proposed by F. Flintstone and B. Rubble

      No, I can't spell

      --
      I like my beverages with warning labels!
    2. Re:In other news... by Elminst · · Score: 5, Funny

      No.. the downside of the hill is easy. It's the upside that kills you.

      badum ching. ;)

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
  3. Great Idea! by maeka · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not having enough cash for an Ipod - I'm going to use this idea with my 35mm slide projector.

  4. Time to upgrade? by fembots · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are all these "innovations" a sign that iPod is in need of a breakthrough? There are more portable players out there with more functions, and I wonder how long will Apple fans stick to it?

    For example, the new Creative's Zen Micro has FM, is someone going to pre-record some radio talk shows and put it into iPod pretending that it's doing radio too?

  5. Well.. by $0+31337 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sound impossible?

    No, Just stupid.

    1. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It highly depends. Can you hold the Ipod with one hand and scroll the wheel well? For, uhh.. never mind.

  6. That's pretty retarded right there by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Informative


    Geesh. Why not just print all the frames out onto paper and make a flipbook?

    If you want a video player in an iPod's form factor, either sit tight for 2 years until a honest-to-goodness Video iPod to come out, or buy a Gmini 200 (Flash page).

    I chose the latter and haven't looked back.

  7. Video in Action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here's a video (in mov or wmv) of the Episode III trailer in action...

    ...which can be played on an iPod, which someone can make a movie of... which can be played on another iPod, which...

  8. I used to have a paperback book that could... by SkyMunky · · Score: 5, Funny

    play movies too.
    I had to flip the pages and hum the soundtrack, but the hand-drawn stick figure animations were outstanding.

  9. Re:WTF? by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Seriously, why is this news?"

    Can't you read? It says iPod right there in the subject line.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  10. In other news... by dr00g911 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've determined a hack to make my original 20 gig iPod play holographic content in surround sound with no additional hardware needed!

    Four hits of acid and stare really hard. Much more elegant (by orders of magnitude) and less of a brute force approach than TFA.

  11. Why no videa on the new iPod? by 3770 · · Score: 5, Insightful


    What is more likely?

    1) The new color iPod does not have video because the hardware can't support it.
    2) Apple does not have a way to sell movies and videos on iTunes.

    --
    The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
  12. Apple losing direction by xThinkx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mod me as a troll of you wish, but I'm not trolling.

    I think the fact that so soon after the new ipod comes out people are brute forcing it to play movies is a demonstration that Apple may be losing its direction in innovation

    I'm an avid digital photographer, and in almost all of the photo boards I hang out on, the opinion of the photo ipod was generally disappointing. How hard would it have been to put a freakin CF card reader in it? How hard would it have been to enable movie playback in at least ONE format?

    The ipod was helped in its jump to the top by the fact that it was innovative, so much so that people were willing to ignore its high price tag. Apple missed two big opportunities on this one; movie playback AND easy storage transfer from camera media.

    I'm not buying a photo ipod now, but I would've in a second if it had those two features. Apple, I hope this is an isolated incident.
    --
    Let's get one thing perfectly clear, I did not vote for George W Bush, and I do not endorse what he does or says.
    "
    1. Re:Apple losing direction by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The ipod was helped in its jump to the top by the fact that it was innovative

      Nope. The iPod made its way to the top by being *simple*. No useless features. No features that *sort-of* work. No features that make the thing a pain-in-the-butt to deal with. It did 1 thing and did that 1 thing well, simply, and trouble-free. Now it does a couple things well, simply, and trouble-free.

      This isn't because Apple can't figure out how to do these things-- you just won't see it in a commercially available product until Apple feels it has it all worked out into a simple interface. And when I say simple, I mean like the scroll-wheel design for the interface, or the fact that there's only 1 in/out port (the dock connector). Apple likes their designs to be fool-proof.

      PS- You can transfer images from a digital camera, but you need an accessory.

    2. Re:Apple losing direction by EricHsu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're not a troll, but I do disagree with you. 1. The iPod didn't sell because of innovative features. It sold because of innovative interface and style (and herd-like fashion momentum). When it came out /. was crapping itself to talk about how stupid the device was because of... low features! Some things never change. 2. Jobs has said many people play music hundreds of times, and only few people play movies repeatedly. The fact that one guy did a 'cause it was there' kind of movie hack on the iPod does not make a market. Maybe as digital video gets easier (got to love those flash-card mini-camcorders, too bad about the shooting quality), the market will grow. 3. It costs money to squeeze features on. It's already expensive as it is. 4. If Apple 'missed' the opportunities, then who is taking advantage of it? Is anyone making money off of a portable mini movie player? I'm not convinced a market exists. My own consumer opinion is I'm not going to get a photo iPod, but I can see the market, especially for the output-to-TV features.

  13. ack by krunchyfrog · · Score: 5, Funny

    How the hell can you scroll a porn movie, hold a kleenex and rub the lamp at the same time?

    --
    printf($randomline(sigs.txt) \n "-- "$randomline(authors.txt));
    -- myself
  14. What's the point of being able to play video? by arhar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Am I the only one who does not need this feature? I listen to my iPod when I'm on the train, when I'm walking somewhere, or when I'm working out.. all of these activities require using your eyes, so watching video is out of the question. Am in the minority here?

  15. Alt links by BostonRob · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google Cache w/o photos: Google Link

    Mirrordot.org also has a copy available:Mirrordot.org

    --
    Big Dig-ing until the money is gone...
  16. Flick through static pictures, why of all the... by Trogre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think I'll stick with my zaurus, thanks.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  17. Printer hack by TWX · · Score: 4, Funny

    "This is like saying that your printer can play movies if you print out each frame and then flip through them.

    Get a Hewlett Packard Color LaserJet 4650DN (duplex for double-sided printing) and plug it into three-phase power and it'll print fast enough to do this...

    Of course, you won't be able to hear the soundtrack over the whine of rollers and gears burning themselves up...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  18. In related news: by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is possible to play movies using a book. Simple use Quicktime Pro to export the movie as thousands of individual frames, print each one, bind them together and flick through them really fast. Audio can be obtained by copying the soundtrack onto a cassette tape and listening to it with your walkman.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  19. Re:Steve Jobs has critized portable video players. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Competing video players are too heavy and cumbersome.

    My Archos Gmini 400 is no larger or heavier than an iPod. And it was released 2 months prior to Jobs' statements.

    Users don't have video content.

    Sure I do! The challenge, and I will admit there's really no user-friendly way of doing this yet, is figuring out which files will play on it as is--that is, MPEG4-SP video AVI files (eg, DivX or XviD w/o bidi filtering), no more than 640x400 resolution, no more than 30fps, with IMA-ADPCM or MP3 CBR soundtrack--and figuring out how to convert other content to meet those specs (if possible).

    The screens are too small.

    Irrelevant. This is a PERSONAL video player.

    I can hold the 2.2" screen a foot away from my eyes, and it takes up the same amount of my viewing area as a 30" television across the room. Uses a whole lot electricity that way, too.

    Jobs would be smart not to put a Video iPod on the market NOW, but he would be foolish to NEVER put one out.