Slashdot Mirror


Wilco on P2P, Digital Music and the Internet

Saint Aardvark writes "As if Wilco wasn't the coolest band in existence anyway, Wired has an interview with them about their relationship with P2P, the Internet, and their fans. For example, they were contacted by fans who'd downloaded A Ghost Is Born before it was released. Lead singer Jeff Tweedy explains, 'They wanted to send money to express solidarity with the fact that we'd embraced the downloading community. We couldn't take the money ourselves, so they asked if we could pick a charity instead -- we pointed them to Doctors Without Borders, and they ended up receiving about $15,000.' Many other choice quotes make this a fascinating read."

38 of 188 comments (clear)

  1. How nice for the fans to donate money by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now, if they did that for all the albums they stole, we could end world hunger.

  2. Is Slashdot just hotlinking Fark? by kevin_conaway · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is the second story today (the first being the Pixar) that has been taken off the front page of Fark.

    This isnt the first time, just the first time I've bothered to pay attention

    1. Re:Is Slashdot just hotlinking Fark? by MikeMacK · · Score: 4, Funny
      hotlinking Fark?

      Is that a Heinlein reference?

    2. Re:Is Slashdot just hotlinking Fark? by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 2, Informative
      As TFS, I can tell you I got it from the ISTS news from yesterday, as linked to at the Internet Storm Center. However, if I hadn't caught it there I probably would've seen it later on when I checked Wired directly.

  3. Doctor's Without Borders? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That sounds like a much better charity than the RIAA's Lawyers Without Ethics.

    1. Re:Doctor's Without Borders? by Zonnald · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or bands who support RIAA Musician's without Balls

  4. Anyone else see 'em at the Orpheum... by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...in Vancouver on the 9th? God almighty, they were great. I'd never realized it before, but Jeff Tweedy has a wicked sense of humour. If they're nearby, treat yourself and go -- it'll be a long, long time before you see another live act this great.

    1. Re:Anyone else see 'em at the Orpheum... by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I did hear an interesting piece on npr talking about the 'Numbers Stations' phenomena. Appearently they got the name for their albumn "Yankee Hotel Foxtrot" from a CD compliation of these number stations.

      --

      "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
  5. Watch out by Folmer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now RIAA will attack them for condoning piracy...

    1. Re:Watch out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is nothing, Ween is creating their own p2p app.

    2. Re:Watch out by hackstraw · · Score: 4, Informative

      This isn't much of a revelation. Wilco, like many music artists that work for a living (ie, play live gigs), don't depend on record sales for their paychecks, they get it from working.

      Its these bubblegum music manager creation "artists" that cannot play (eg, Ashlee Simpson), but have canned lyrics that appeal to a large number of people that depend on record sales for their income. Actually, its more of the music manager's and the labels that depend on the record sales for income. The artists get a token commission which provides them enough money to feel rich for a period of time until they have to get a real job.

      From Wilco's website:

      wilco does permit audio taping and trading of live performances wherever it does not conflict with venue or other restrictions beyond our control. we do not allow direct soundboard patches. we also do not allow videotaping.wilco supports the free trading of live recordings for non-commercial purposes.

      I would bet that any other taper friendly band would not care about p2p or whatever, because, again, these bands work for a living, and they know they will make money when they are working.

    3. Re:Watch out by Hatta · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I would bet that any other taper friendly band would not care about p2p or whatever, because, again, these bands work for a living, and they know they will make money when they are working.

      I could fucking care less if everybody downloads our album off the Internet. We're not in a position to be screwed by that at all. We have the one thing the Internet can't touch-live music. If you can actually go out and play your fucking instruments, you won't be replaced by the Internet. If you're a good live act and you put on a good show, people will buy a ticket to see your show.
      -Jon Fishman.
      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  6. Lost Sales? by fembots · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Selling entertainment is like selling perishable fruit, you need to do it while it's still fresh and desirable.

    For example, I quite like Scissor Sisters' "Take Your Mama", so I paid for the CD and listened to it. But I must admit you can only listen to one song for so many times until you're sick of it. So now the enjoyment from this song is long gone, but I have already paid $20 for this now-known-as piece of plastic and song that I no longer enjoy.

    I believe any potential "lost sales" are from people who, on one hand, don't want to pay for the music, but on the other, want to enjoy that particular music.

    Will this be considered "Lost Sales" if someone told you:
    "Nah, this shitty movie is only worth watching it once, why would I pay for the DVD/Movie?".

    This person could pay for the DVD/Movie and watch it once, or download it from the Internet and watch it once. Either way this person got one unit of enjoyment out of this, but it's not quite the same to capitalist.

    1. Re:Lost Sales? by Neil+Blender · · Score: 3, Funny

      I believe any potential "lost sales" are from people who, on one hand, don't want to pay for the music, but on the other, want to enjoy that particular music.

      I bought a New York steak at the store for $10.00. I ate it and enjoyed it quite a bit. However, at this point it is a worthless log floating somewhere in the sewer system. Should I have stolen the steak instead?

    2. Re:Lost Sales? by JoseFilipe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you were only interested in that particular song, maybe you could have bought it from iTMS or even the single. If you bought the single, you would get some rare tracks!

    3. Re:Lost Sales? by fembots · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, that's what I'm trying to get to. If you think that piece of shit in the toilet isn't worth $10, you shouldn't have paid for it, or eaten it without paying.

      However, if you think $10 is fair price to buy the initial 10 minutes of juicy, tender chewy feeling in your mouth, then you should've paid for it, not eaten it for free and backed up your action by suggesting its final destination in the sewer.

      I can't see anyone can get away with going into a movie theatre, watched a movie without paying and said "Hey, there were empty seats anyway, so what's the harm that I just went in and watch it for free? I didn't sit on the seat, and I even bought popcorn from your counter!"

      Or jumped onto an empty bus for a ride without paying, and since it doesn't cost the bus company any more by carrying zero or one passenger, are we all entitled to free bus ride provided it's not full?

      In certain area (intellectual property in particular), maybe it's more about if the receiver benefits from the service, not if the provider suffers any cost.

  7. playing a little devil's advocate... by jxyama · · Score: 2, Interesting
    while this is very nice, does this make "traditional" musicians "evil"? are volunteers always better than those who charge for their services? could majority of contributors to OSS afford to do so if they had no external income to support their "hobbies"?

    don't we all have to make money somewhere to live and could we "fault" those wanting to? if you can make a living via hobbies, more power to them... but is it wrong to make a living?

    1. Re:playing a little devil's advocate... by Linux-based-robots · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not wrong to make a living as long as you're ethical about it. Phishing or spamming may be a way to make a living but it's not ethical. And neither is suing your fans or restricting the sharing of published information such as music. And before someone goes "blah blah blah, how will there be an incentive without all the $$$ that comes from restricting people", just remember that the entire Renaissance got along just fine without copyright laws.

    2. Re:playing a little devil's advocate... by sordid_mammal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      no one is saying "traditional musicians" are evil. this is an example of something that should be obvious. the internet is a new distrubution channel. just because someone can get your music for free on P2P doesn't mean your going to go broke and not be able to make a living. if anything you'll get more exposure and make more money. i'd never heard of wilco before yankee hotel foxtrot. now they're even bigger.

      --
      "Oh, dear. She's stuck in an infinite loop and he's an idiot. Well, that's love for you." - Professor Farnsworth
    3. Re:playing a little devil's advocate... by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      while this is very nice, does this make "traditional" musicians "evil"? are volunteers always better than those who charge for their services? could majority of contributors to OSS afford to do so if they had no external income to support their "hobbies"?

      They are mainstream artists getting mainstream play, mainstream press, and apparently making mainstream money yet they just seem to have the attitude of "woah, cool" instead of "woah, not enough money made".

      Well, to me, that makes the "traditional musicians" money hungry fucktards. Obviously, if your music is good and you are willing to work with the fans they are willing to work w/you back. You think I am going to feed money to some jackass that fights with their fans who are only interested in listening to the music? Nope.

      It's obvious that you CAN and WILL make money even if you support free distribution, GASP, what a novel idea.

      Sadly, some refuse to believe that and continue to attract shit fans, make shit music, and pretty much end up as a stain on the wall of the memory of everyone (Spears has been married twice, annuled once, and may be pregnant with "Aurora" -- your fading away into irrelevance).

      The Grateful Dead never made ANY money allowing the free trading of their music, nope, no way. Neither did Phish or DMB. Nope. Oh wait they even have LOYAL fans! Crazy.

    4. Re:playing a little devil's advocate... by celeritas_2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know there was a time that art wasn't about money. Google gives everything away and they still happen to be making just a little bit of money. And, I don't recall there being a similarity between "making a living" and having more money than most small African nations. There are still such things as concerts [impossible to reproduce experience, not piratable] which I would be willing to pay for.

      --
      -- Checking emails and kicking cheats `till the day I die.
    5. Re:playing a little devil's advocate... by UWC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      just remember that the entire Renaissance got along just fine without copyright laws

      Wasn't the Renaissance all about patrons supporting the artists so they didn't starve? I don't think there was much marketing done once an artist found someone to feed him. Add to that the fact that Gutenberg didn't make his printing press until the Italian Renaissance was apparently underway, and copyrights didn't seem all that necessary. Even the later northern European renaissance wasn't exactly the deluge of popular media that exists today. Much of that was either rich guys with time to ponder things trading ideas or, again, people with patrons/sponsors suporting them while they thought about things.

      Works during the Renaissance tended to be either hard to reproduce or of severely limited interest to most people.

  8. Re:"We couldn't take the money ourselves" by xThinkx · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's most likely a record label issue, while record labels (usually) can't prevent you for doing things for free, they DO control all money you receive for sales of albums, merch, etc. That's why bands that make gold records often make more off of non-record-company related deals (like interviews, photo shoots, hosting MTV shows, modeling contracts, movies, etc.) than actual album sales (not that the album sale profits rae anything to laugh at).

    --
    Let's get one thing perfectly clear, I did not vote for George W Bush, and I do not endorse what he does or says.
    "
  9. Wilco by blackmonday · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Thing is, Yankee Hotel Foxtrot is such an amazing album, that even if the album hadn't been released online, I still think it would have been succesful. (I'm for it though!) Great music spreads by word of mouth and CD-R and P2P, regardless of who made it. My buddy made me a copy of YHF and that's how I got into that band.

    By the way there's a great documentary of the band making the CD, its called I am Trying To Break Your Heart. I highly recommend it. Shows the whole process of being dumped by your label then getting picked up by another label, both of whom were owned by the same umbrella company. Strange stuff, today's music business.

    Wilco's ethics are very punk rock, even if their music belongs on its own planet. If you haven't heard YHF, do yourself a favor and pick it up.

    1. Re:Wilco by utexaspunk · · Score: 2, Funny

      My buddy made me a copy of YHF and that's how I got into that band

      You're in Wilco? I didn't know they read slashdot! What do you play? Can I have your autograph? Do you think maybe your buddy could burn me a copy of YHF so I can be in the band, too?

    2. Re:Wilco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      they're alt.country. go pick up some Uncle Tupelo. oh, and buy a clue while you're out.

  10. Article's on fark.com too by EZmagz · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Just got done reading the interview, and it's nice to see that some musicians are still pretty grounded and down to earth. By far my favorite quote in the article is this:
    WN: Your critics might say that it's easy for you to say that, given that you're already a commercial success.

    Tweedy: I'm grateful that I've sold enough to have a house, take care of my kids and live decently. But that's a gift, not an entitlement.

    Those last three words blew me away. Although I'm not a huge Wilco fan, I definitely appreciate where they're coming from. To me at least, they embody what a True Musician consists of. Somebody who plays music for the sake of making music. Somebody who if they make enough money playing at clubs and hawking CDs to make a living, then GREAT! But if not, they'll still be playing on the weekends and at nights when they're done with their 9-to-5.

    Now contrast that with Britney Spears or Ashley Simpson. Think they'd be singing in their garage if their "music" career never took off? Fuck no. Since they only care about entertaining and not making music, they'd probably be just another coked-out stripper on the LA Strip, telling you how they're going to make it big and be somebody between lapdances and serving you a $10 cocktail.

    Regardless, it's glad to know there's still a few bands out there who are in it for the love.

    --

    "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned for SEGA. ..."

    1. Re:Article's on fark.com too by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Since they only care about entertaining and not making music, they'd probably be just another coked-out stripper on the LA Strip, telling you how they're going to make it big and be somebody between lapdances and serving you a $10 cocktail.

      Damn. I was worried you weren't going to be able to work any misogyny into that post.

      Saved it at the end. Close one.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  11. Good chance to put your money where your mouth is by serutan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I read this article (on Fark, yesterday), I immediately went to Wilco's site and ordered a copy of their CD "A Ghost is Born," and if they swing through Seattle I will take in their show. Band promotion through free downloads instead of record contracts is the future of music, and is the key to getting the record industry off our backs before they buy enough legislation to keep us from accessing our hard drives without their permission.

    Fame and fortune have been the carrot on the stick which the record industry has been able to dangle in front of musicians for the past century. When a few bands demonstrate that it's possible to succeed without signing over their lives to a big label, others will follow. Reaching #8 on Billboard is one of the first cracks in this wall. Help it spread!

  12. Its good someone gets it by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Eventually all our media with be categorized by user for download, and you can see/hear/learn things that interest you.
    Its a global library and it will happen.

    God spoke to me:
    www.geocities.com/James_Sager_PA

  13. makes you realize the size of the market by museumpeace · · Score: 4, Insightful

    given the dismal % yield on most charity soliciting, getting 15000$ form total strangers is a good showing. This is just an anecdote from the war raging between copyright holders, major labels and file swappers but it does make me think: The size of the market if you include all who file-swap and download must be vastly greater than the market that only counts those who buy CD's or are on the fence about a CD purchase. If a band could get a few pennies/track each from the larger market and nobody was peeing away millions on promotion, it just seems possible they could earn a living by their art and not soak their fans in the process. If downloaders thought of themselves as "supporting the band's future work" rather than "buying this song" ,which they could just as easily swipe, maybe they'd pay a little and not mind. Is that the paradigmn shift thats gnawing away at the mass marketing of music as we now know it? Given the huge exposure potential of freely available streamed samples, why would you need to spend on poromotion anyway? For years we have had shareware vendors giving away one version of a program in hopes that users would be pleased enough to pay for a better version. How similar is that model to what Wilco is doing?

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    1. Re:makes you realize the size of the market by NerveGas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      given the dismal % yield on most charity soliciting

      That's just the problem, their soliciting. You can't give money to a single charity without forever being flooded with a hundred other charities calling you for more money.

      In my last house, someone with the previous number had once given money to the Veterens of Foreign Wars and the local Police charity. It did not matter how many times I told them that I would never, ever give them a penny because they called so often, they never quit. And neither did the hundred other charities with whom the donation lists had been shared.

      I really wouldn't mind giving money to more charities. I just wish that they could see it as a kind, benevolent act, and be thankful for it without pestering me for the rest of my life.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  14. Re:"We couldn't take the money ourselves" by damiangerous · · Score: 2, Informative

    I reread the article and answered my own question. The record they chose to release after being dropped was Yankee Hotel Foxtrot. The record fans were attempting to pay for was A Ghost Is Born, their newest album being released by the label Nonesuch, which had been leaked onto P2P extremely early. They couldn't take money for A Ghost Is Born because Nonesuch obviously had publishing rights.

  15. Re:Many good quotes from Tweedy. by borkus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Stop trying to treat music like it's a tennis shoe, something to be branded. If the music industry wants to save money, they should take a look at some of their six-figure executive expense accounts. All those lawsuits can't be cheap, either.
    and
    Treating your audience like thieves is absurd. Anyone who chooses to listen to our music becomes a collaborator.

    People who look at music as commerce don't understand that. They are talking about pieces of plastic they want to sell, packages of intellectual property.

    I'm not interested in selling pieces of plastic.


    I think people are disgusted at the RIAA (and the music industry in general) not only because they trod all over the rights of listeners, but because they don't serve the needs of artists either. Whether you're a musician, fan, retailer or broadcaster, the industy is out to screw you. Unfortunately, it's also a cartel that does everything it can to quash channels that are more favorable to musicians and their audience.

  16. Interested in real alt-country? by dhakbar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you actually want to broaden your musical horizons, try to find some Slim Cessna's Auto Club or any of Jay Munly's solo work.

    Now that shit's original.

  17. Re:Anyone tell me where to get... by okpgreg · · Score: 2, Informative

    you can download some of their shows in mp3 from http://www.the-grotto.com/

  18. Re:other people made this record aside from Wilco by AlinuxNCSU · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Except the record company dropped them because Wilco wouldn't make music the way they wanted. That means Tweedy and the rest of Wilco were free to do whatever they wanted, including streaming the album on the Internet.

    But I mean, come off it man. You sound like those silly MPAA trailers before movies.

    I guess I should know better than to feed the trolls.

    -Alex

  19. Re:other people made this record aside from Wilco by shark72 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "But I mean, come off it man. You sound like those silly MPAA trailers before movies."

    He's correct. I know it's fun to engage in a little schadenfreude when we read of record companies laying off hundreds of people -- that will teach the greedy bastards for overpricing CDs! -- but while it's enjoyable imagine those hundreds of people to be Mercedes-driving executives with cocaine addictions, the reality is that it's usually Mary in IT or John in promotions or Fred who sweeps the floors.

    To be clear, you don't owe Mary or John or Fred a job. It's the record company's job to deal with the effect of piracy. If you want to get that CD on Kazaa, go for it, but if you're doing so to avoid buying it, it will ultimately mean less money for Mary or John or Fred.

    --
    Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.