Slashdot Mirror


Humans Born to Run

chia_monkey writes "This article in MSNBC says humans were born to run. From tendons and ligaments in the legs and feet that act like springs and skull features that help prevent overheating, to well-defined buttocks that stabilize the body, the human anatomy is shaped for running. The article also goes on to talk about our rumps: Big buttocks are also important. 'Have you ever looked at an ape? They have no buns,' said Bramble."

83 comments

  1. So..Sir Mixalot was right after all..... by venom600 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Big buttocks are also important.

    I'll be damned.

    1. Re:So..Sir Mixalot was right after all..... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a tempting sig replacement.

      --

      Big buttocks are also important.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:So..Sir Mixalot was right after all..... by over_exposed · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well defined buttocks my a... wait... no, nevermind.

      --
      "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
  2. So I'm a throwback, eh ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who has recently started running semi-regularly to get back in shape, I can tell you MY body isn't made for it.

    1. Re:So I'm a throwback, eh ? by Retric · · Score: 1

      It's the semi-regularly that's the problem. Running 2 miles 6 days a week is much much better than running 4 miles 3 days a week. Try this work out 20 min every morning rain or shine then if you get home from work and feel like it do a 2nd 20 min workout if not no big deal. If you do this for 3 months and your under 50 those 20 min in the morning will start to feel like nothing just another part of waking up and while you may or may not work out after you get home your body will be more than ready to take it.

    2. Re:So I'm a throwback, eh ? by Tyndmyr · · Score: 1
      Bullshit it feels like nothing. If you like it, sure, knock yourself out. And generally, if you like it, you have trouble understanding why others dont.

      And before you start spouting off pearls of wisdom like "but you havent tried it", I've been in the military a year now, and running is the only form of PT that the leadership appears to understand.

      --
      Support more choices in goverment-Vote 3rd party.
  3. Anyone else notice... by oldosadmin · · Score: 2, Funny

    That the chick pictured in TFA doesn't have a big butt?

    (disclaimer: she's still cute, but that's funny)

    --
    Jay | http://oldos.org
    1. Re:Anyone else notice... by secolactico · · Score: 1

      Great, now I have to against my slashdotter instincts and go check TFA.

      --
      No sig
    2. Re:Anyone else notice... by Holi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (disclaimer: she's still cute, but that's funny)


      why do you say that because she's female? You can't see her face or really tell anything about the curves of her body due to the angle and the tremendous amount of hair.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    3. Re:Anyone else notice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How 'bout this one?

      http://suicidegirls.com/img/preview/08.jpg

      I'd run for some of that....

    4. Re:Anyone else notice... by Student_Tech · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they mean large in comparison to primates. Most of the primate pictures I can remember have nothing, whereas a human has something on the rear.

      For the humans that have large butts, do you see them running faster or slower than humans with smaller butts?

    5. Re:Anyone else notice... by flewp · · Score: 1

      And you'd have to run just slightly faster than her to catch her...

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  4. Springsteen was right by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 5, Funny

    Damnit, baby, we were born to run.

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
  5. Big butts on slashdot by neosake · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm willing to bet that most big buts reading /. aren't from running...

    ... well, at least in my case that is.

    --
    "When a ball dreams, it dreams it's a frisbee"
    1. Re:Big butts on slashdot by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Genetic has alot to do with it. Let's see how long it takes before some scientist finds the Big-Ass gene.

  6. Why I read slashdot... by The+AntiDJ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I read slashdot because I can see links to articles that appeared on the MSN homepage 2 days ago! With cutting edge reporting like this, why would anyone go anywhere else for news?

    1. Re:Why I read slashdot... by Cqwense · · Score: 1

      I'll never understand the complaints about when a story gets posted on ./

      I would rather read a story a day or two later, nice and ready for flaming ./, then on MSNs headache-maker news page.

      I think lots of people would agree with me, because you never hear of a server going up in flames over the MSN effect =).

      --
      One sig to rule them all, one sig to find them one sig to bring them all, and in ./ bind them.
    2. Re:Why I read slashdot... by secretsquirel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "With cutting edge reporting like this, why would anyone go anywhere else for news?"

      To get more up to date reporting instead of the luxury of having it all in one place?

    3. Re:Why I read slashdot... by arodland · · Score: 1

      You don't read dotslash. ./ is for running things in the current directory. /. is for reading. If you get confused when you're posting, use IE or Firefox and look at the address bar. See that pretty blue icon? It tells you what you're looking at!

    4. Re:Why I read slashdot... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I'm here for the dupes, man.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  7. My Eyes! by DLWormwood · · Score: 5, Funny
    Have you ever looked at an ape? They have no buns,' said Bramble.

    I've looked at apes before, but not like that.

    Ew. Off to use some mental floss.

    --
    Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    1. Re:My Eyes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Have you ever looked at an ape? They have no buns,' said Bramble.

      Well, I can't say that I have but...

      I've heard that the reason why men are attracted to women who wear bright red lipstick is because it's a throwback to how the rear end of a female ape gets red when she's horny and ready to mate. Seing a red round object triggers the same sex drive in us that it did our prehistoric ancestors. So when you are thinking of, ahem, enjoying a woman's full, red lips, it's like your homo erectus part wants to enjoy the rear end of a protohuman.

      Ew. Off to use some mental floss.

      Hmmmm. I have the feeling that I just made a bad situation worse...

    2. Re:My Eyes! by Holi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've heard it a little differently, that during arousal a women's lips (and other parts of her body) become flushed and swollen with blood. Red lipstick and collegen treatment are just designed to give women the look of permanent sexual arousal.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    3. Re:My Eyes! by DLWormwood · · Score: 3, Funny
      Hmmmm. I have the feeling that I just made a bad situation worse...

      Thank you, Desmond Morris! Geez...

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    4. Re:My Eyes! by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      Curse Desmond Morris! Since I read about the aquatic ape theory, I'm sold. It explains everything, neatly. This running-around with spears explanation just doesn't make sense.

    5. Re:My Eyes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is slashdot. The grandparent poster may not have seen an aroused woman.

    6. Re:My Eyes! by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

      It couldn't be simply clearly defined color that stands out. Nah, couldn't be...

      Freaks!

      --
      The message on the other side of this sig is false.
  8. Citing prior research in this area by GuyMannDude · · Score: 4, Funny

    This provides an interesting corallary to work done by Dr. Freddie Mercury and his colleagues many years ago on the relation between women with big buttocks and the rotation of the Earth.

    GMD

    1. Re:Citing prior research in this area by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 2, Funny
    2. Re:Citing prior research in this area by ksdd · · Score: 1

      Let's not overlook the similar research done by Tufnel, St. Hubbins, Smalls, and Shrimpton, proving the relationship between bottom size and insanity.

    3. Re:Citing prior research in this area by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      Erm, am I supposed to have made it this far, then?

      Consider, I do my best to maintain good health, though my lungs are highly susceptible to congestive, exercise-induced asthma; my sister's and my muscles have *way* too many fast-twitch cells to sustain heavy activity very well (yes, there was a biopsy performed...); my ligaments are too long, meaning that certain types of athletic activities (contact sports, vigorous running) are very dangerous for me (I had to get surgery and was on crutches for a third of a year once, after I tore up the inside of my knee trying to jump while running in gym class) because my joints don't hold themselves together (my kneecaps slide out of place, my bones bang into each other at funny angles, etc.); and, my mother's side of the family has granted me flat feet without much of an arch (I suspect this precipitates the frequent painful spasms in my arches).

      I really do love running, feeling the wind rush over me, and watching the ground go whooshing by, but I really can't do it too much or too vigorously.

      Maybe my joint problems will mostly disappear when my bones are fully grown in a few more years (I'm only 20); maybe my asthma is just because of smog; maybe I just need lots of good training to do anything more than sprint; and maybe careful arch-toning exercises would help with the foot spasms. But, it just seems like someone Up There said, "Hmm, this guy is going to like running, but I have more important things I need him to do, including posting on slashdot. I can't have him wasting his time on serious athletics."

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
  9. News for nerds. Stuff that matters. by chia_monkey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I read slashdot because I can see links to articles that appeared on the MSN homepage 2 days ago! With cutting edge reporting like this, why would anyone go anywhere else for news?

    I agree...you could find the news other places. But do you want to sort through all the crap to find the news that matters? It's all here! Yipee! Let the submitters do all the sorting and submitting so you only have to go to one site for the cool stuff.

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  10. Barring bad Bruce Springsteen jokes by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    About human beings from New Jersey- does our lack of body hair also count (at least for those of use who are more fortuneate than I am- it's not thick but it's everywhere)? Seems like it would make us more streamlined.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Barring bad Bruce Springsteen jokes by El · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right, that's what makes cheetahs so slow -- their body hair.

      I'm willing to bet that at human running speed, aerodynamic drag doesn't make much of a difference. Ever notice how even world class sprinters run wearing baggy clothes, jewelry, and even artificial nails? Obviously that necklace isn't slowing them down much. Why don't they wear teardrop shaped helmets like the cyclists?

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    2. Re:Barring bad Bruce Springsteen jokes by zentinal · · Score: 1

      More Streamlined?
      No (as another poster already noted).
      But easier to cool? Perhaps.
      But other examples of long distance running (cheetahs don't count(short bursts of extreme speed)) savannah inhabitants aren't furless. Why aren't zebras or gazelles naked? If they had a bigger brain to cool, would they just have striped skin (to keep the massed optical confusion effect) but little significant hair?

    3. Re:Barring bad Bruce Springsteen jokes by GuyWithLag · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've read about an anthropologist who demonstrated that a non-couch-potato human could easily run down an antelope and kill her. The trick was that the human jogs after the antelope, which darts away a short distance and then stops. The human keeps jogging after the antelope, which darts away, then stops again. This goes on for several minutes, after which the antelope is so overheated it can barely stand on its legs, much less run away. Voila, dinner is ready.

  11. Bullshit. by Demona · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We ran to catch food or escape an enemy, but for thousands of years when we wanted to go someplace, we walked. We weren't the fastest or strongest - we couldn't outrun quadrupeds. But in addition to outthinking them, we could outwalk them. Conquerors may have ridden on horseback, but the ones who came on foot and brought their tools and families were the organizers of civilization. (somewhat paraphrased from The Magic of Walking, by Aaron Sussman and Ruth Goode)

    --
    Fuck Slashdot
    1. Re:Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, but you better not walk too far from the cave or the trees if you can't run. You better not follow that conqueror on his horse into barbarian lands if you can't sprint for your life when you need to. You can crawl across a continent, but you can't sprint across an open field you'll do it just to become somebody's meal or slave.

    2. Re:Bullshit. by Pentagram · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But in addition to outthinking them, we could outwalk them.

      I'm not sure abstract intelligence was that useful to our distant ancestors (though of course it has become more useful as civilisation has developed).

      I'd more likely point to our superb visual acuity, and our unparalleled dexterity and communication skills. It was these qualities, coupled to our endurance, that I would argue made our species successful enough to be able to afford to develop large brains.

    3. Re:Bullshit. by GuyWithLag · · Score: 1

      we couldn't outrun quadrupeds

      No, but we can certainly outjog them. The human and the wolf have an extra gait type (jogging), that will, in time, overtake any other walking or running animal. Of course, the fact that we are endurance joggers (when fit) helps too.

    4. Re:Bullshit. by Evil+Pete · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The point the authors made was not that humans are good sprinters, which we aren't, but that we are extremely good long distance runners. We can outrun most other creatures over long distances. This was important when we expanded into the savannah and had to beat the hyenas to any newly fallen carcass. I read this in Nature and New Scientist and also heard an interview with the guy (who used the hyena example) ... interestingly the radio interview was on a mainstream station, prime time before I had even seen any mention in the journals. One example the guy gave was that over long distances humans can outrun horses, assuming you've got people who are used to running a lot. Interesting. I remember locally there was this guy, became a national folk hero, he was in his 60s ran everywhere on the farm chasing cattle. Decided to go in an ultra-marathon, about 1,000 km. First effort he beat the world leaders by about 8 hours or more , can't remember the exact lead he had, fellow Aussies might remember Cliff Young. This gives an idea of the 'typical' endurance of a hunter pursuing game.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    5. Re:Bullshit. by swillden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      we could outwalk them.

      Very true.

      An excellent example of this is an observation I read in the diary of a US soldier from the indian wars era. He noted that when the army really needed to cover long distances quickly, they had to leave the cavalry behind, because the horses couldn't keep up. Sure, the horses were faster for short distances like, say a couple hundred miles. But when they had to cover a thousand miles as quickly as possible, the horses couldn't take the pounding. If you rested them enough to keep them healthy, they were too slow. The infantry, on the other hand, could cover 30-35 miles per day, seven (well, usually six) days a week, week after week after week.

      In a similar vein, ultramarathons are somewhat popular these days, many of them with 100-mile courses. I've heard that the first 100-mile race was actually started as an endurance race for horses, with the primary goal to complete in less than 24 hours. Then one year one of the riders' horse went lame, so after taking care of the animal he decided to finish the race out on foot. The next year, he decided to run the whole thing on foot, and did very well. After a few more years went by the horsemen eventually dropped out of the race -- because they couldn't compete!

      These days, most ultra winners finish the 100 miles well under 24 hours, sometimes in as little as 15 or 16 hours.

      A well-tuned human body is amazingly good at long-distance foot travel.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  12. This is what I think by MonkeysKickAss · · Score: 0

    If we were born to run, first why can't I run without hacking up a lung, and second why couldnt it be that we were born to smoke, then we would have stronger lungs and thus be able to hold bigger hits.

    --
    MonkeysKickAss
  13. Have you ever looked at an ape? They have no buns by Pugflop · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I dunno how you swing buddy, but no, no I haven't.

  14. I suppose the big buttocks is relative by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

    I guess the article means the big buttocks is relative to the rest of the body. If you look at sprinters, they tend to have more of a "bubble butt," but cross-country runners are generally classified as "flat-assed."

    BTW, is this even news? I saw a person running yesterday, and he seemed to take to it pretty naturally, almost like he was born with the ability.

  15. Heard this on NPR... by slasher999 · · Score: 1

    ...a couple of days ago. It was a good piece - interesting stuff. Not sure how much of it made it into the article, but it was interesting how they compared humans to other animals explaning how humans are better suited to distance running. Other animals - dogs was an example I believe they used - are better suited for sprinting.

  16. Old News by VernonNemitz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The science fiction writer David Brin wrote about these things years ago. First there was an "ANALOG" fact article (sorry don't recall which issue", and then there was one of his "Uplift War" books. Look up "cursorial hunting" sometime. No Wiki for it yet, apparently (but I bet there will be one shortly!). It means the prey is chased until it keels over from exhaustion first. Humans are the best cursorial hunters around, with possibly highest percentage of total body mass in their legs and leg muscles (including buttocks) of any land critter, ever.

  17. Cursorial hunting. by CryptoEngineer · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This is actually an idea which has been around for some time. As the article notes, while humans can be outrun by almost every mammal in the sprint, there are only a very few wild animals with comparable endurance - the horse, the wolf, and the hyena. No other mammals can run a marathon.

    This means that humans can run down prey. Chase an antelope, and it'll run a few hundred yards far faster than you can, then stop to rest. If you just keep dogtrotting after it, it'll do it again, and again. But after a couple miles, it'll be so tired that you can catch up with it and hit it over the head with a big stick.

    This is called 'cursorial hunting'. Only wolves, hyenas, and humans can do this - chase after a quarry till it drops in its tracks.

    1. Re:Cursorial hunting. by IvoryRing · · Score: 1

      But Ren, why can't Mr. Horse do that?

    2. Re:Cursorial hunting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But this only works on the plains for humans, and for animals that don't burrow or form large herds for a quarry to hide in. Humans need to be guaranteed to be able to see their prey at all times to justify the investment in energy of a long chase. A human needs to be able to identify one animal and concentrate the chase on that one animal, and there needs to be nowhere for that one animal to hide. This leaves deer, kangaroos, some birds like turkeys, and goats that form small herds of insufficient size to confuse attentive human eyes and whose bodies are large enough to be unable to hide in holes and to justify the expenditure of energy. Arrow/spear wounds, even if unable to completely immobilize the animal might be able to help to wear it down and provide a distinguishing wound, and provide a blood trail.

      Wild boar seem to be good quarry except that they live in forests where this strategy doesn't work. Wolves can follow a scent trail though, and so can probably run down boar successfully, inflicting minor bite wounds along the way to slowly drain the stamina from the pig.

    3. Re:Cursorial hunting. by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      I thought Lemmings were good at running around...???

    4. Re:Cursorial hunting. by Pentagram · · Score: 1

      I suspect our strategies were so good that many of the animals that could be hunted in this way were made extinct. A lot of big animals died out in the Pleistocene.

    5. Re:Cursorial hunting. by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      only a very few wild animals with comparable endurance - the horse, the wolf, and the hyena.

      I wonder if that has anything to do with dogs being man's best friend? I mean, to this day, some people use dogs when hunting.

  18. A genetic marker for steatopygia .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe then there could be a pill to cause this condition naturally. And one for breasts too!

    1. Re:A genetic marker for steatopygia .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dude, lay off the pr0n
      It will only make you go blind....
  19. Re:Bullshit on your bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    See this article

    I have also heard of an aboriginal Australian tribe that used to / still does? run down kangaroos.

    Think about it. A bunch of marathon runners with spears jog after you all day. You are fit, but not trained for endurance running. Each time you stop for a break, they catch up to you relentlessly, dogging you. Only fear of death gives you the reserves to keep up your flight all day long, sprinting and then resting while they doggedly persue you. You are suprised your heart hasn't burst. Then it starts to get dark. You rest, and this time they don't persue you. They make camp. You fall fast asleep almost immediately grateful that your persuers have stopped chasing you. You wake up to the prod of a spear in your backside. OUCH! It's morning, and the people that chased you all day are upon you. Your instinct is to dart away, but you find that your every muscle has ceased to function. You feel like you must have rigormortis, and are completely unable to move as they tie you to a spit and plop you over their fire to cook.

  20. So, why don't we have tails? by El · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wouldn't a tail be much more effective than a gluteous maximus for maintaining balance while running? It works pretty well for cheetahs...

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    1. Re:So, why don't we have tails? by ThetaPi · · Score: 2, Funny

      We do have tails, but ours are vestigial. So is our appendix. Also, remember that bipedal and quadrupedal movement is much different.

      I've always thought having a prehensile tail would be nifty, but it would make sitting down and purchasing clothing a bit more difficult.

      --
      "When God kisses Satan and the Incarnations applaud." "Death is dead. Long live Death!"
  21. Mary Ja Wanna is bad m'kay. It's a gateway drug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to tobacco, which should be outlawed instead of weed.

  22. I heard about this study while running by rhettoric · · Score: 1

    For me, the ideal when running is when I can get my body onto "auto-pilot" which leaves me with plenty of mental cycles to think. Often I listen to NPR otherwise it can get a bit monotonous (and for all the nike commericals you may have seen, listening to Nirvana for a four hour run gets real, old real quick). Though it's a rare occurance, listening to stories about running while running always makes me smile. In any case, I found it amusing that two of the lead scientists for this "discovery" are both long-distance runners as well. One said he wasn't biased but that he did do his best thinking while running. Not saying that it's not true (I can see many ways in which long distance running would be an evolutionary benefit, esspecially when it comes to getting to food), but it's easy to ascribe almost any attribute to an activity that modern humans do regularly. See that large bum is actually very beneficial for sitting. Those who didn't have a comfy reear would fidget a lot and would be noticed by bears and eaten first...that sort of thing.

    1. Re:I heard about this study while running by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      . See that large bum is actually very beneficial for sitting. Those who didn't have a comfy reear would fidget a lot and would be noticed by bears and eaten first...

      And in other news . . .

      Thousands of fat, lazy slashdotters breath a collective sigh of relief.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  23. Humans Born to Run by Suppafly · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Hasn't Bruce Springsteen been saying that for quite some time?

  24. "well-defined buttocks" by MisterMoney · · Score: 1

    Why thank you. I didn't think anyone would notice.

    1. Re:"well-defined buttocks" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing what they can do with silicone nowadays!

  25. The entry fees will get you by benhocking · · Score: 2, Funny
    As the article notes, while humans can be outrun by almost every mammal in the sprint, there are only a very few wild animals with comparable endurance - the horse, the wolf, and the hyena. No other mammals can run a marathon.

    I recently finished the Marine Corps Marathon, and I don't recall seeing any horses, wolves, or hyenas. Just out of curiosity, I searched for all of these (as last names), and although I didn't find any horses or hyeynas, it would appear that I ran with several wolves (or at least Wolfs). Of course, I think this has less to do with evolutionary pressure than fiduciary pressure. The entrance fee for the MCM (and most marathons) is fairly steep ($85).

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  26. Lipsticks by lashi · · Score: 1
    >I've heard that the reason why men are attracted to women who wear bright red lipstick is because it's a throwback to how the rear end of a female ape gets red when she's horny and ready to mate.

    hmmm.. that's actually less disturbing than another version I heard about ancient Greek man inventing lipsticks to paint their lips to resemble women's privates.

    Actually, now I think about it, I am really not sure which one is more disturbing.

    I know I like my girl's full lips because they look more kissable.

  27. A bun a day... by Ehwaz003 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Big buttocks are also important. 'Have you ever looked at an ape? They have no buns

    Makes me think of a song:
    "We can feel like... sandwiches
    You can be the bun,
    I can be the burger."

    And of course we were born to run. Look at all the things we have to run away from today:
    • Microsoft
    • Terrorists
    • Mother-in-laws
    • Those 360 pounds "I eat a couple of burgers a day" big mama's
    • SCO employees
    • CowboyNeal
    --
    I give massages and reiki treatments (for real!). More info here: http://www.universele-levensenergie.be
  28. So does this mean JLO should be good at running? How about 90% of the /. readers?

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
  29. How about... by d3l3t3_m3 · · Score: 1

    ...we weren't born to run but the gene survived because it had the features needed to run???

  30. Trivia Question... by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    What is the english word that means that someone has a beautiful butt. Looking for the real definition, not some slang. :)

    1. Re:Trivia Question... by jake_eck · · Score: 2, Informative

      What is the english word that means that someone has a beautiful butt. Looking for the real definition, not some slang.

      callipygian

    2. Re:Trivia Question... by elhaf · · Score: 1

      Dang, beat me to it. You get the cookie.

      --
      Six score characters.
      Brevity being wit's soul
      I have enough space.
    3. Re:Trivia Question... by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      I think "bootylicious" is perfectly descriptive!

      Certainly more so than "callipygian."

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  31. Humans are born to... by dargaud · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects." --Robert A. Heinlein.
    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  32. True...wife does this all the time to me by FerretFrottage · · Score: 1

    ..at the mall... I run and run, but she always catches me and hits me with a big stick.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  33. T & A by PateraSilk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Another fun Desmond Morris factoid: human females have enlarged breasts to mimic the shape of their well-defined buttocks, so human-style face-to face is as exciting to males as mammal-default doggy-style.

    --
    Danke tres mucho, tovarishch.
  34. throwing by Zaak · · Score: 1

    I'd more likely point to our superb visual acuity, and our unparalleled dexterity and communication skills. It was these qualities, coupled to our endurance, that I would argue made our species successful enough to be able to afford to develop large brains.

    In discussions like these I never see anyone mention human throwing ability. No other animal can throw as hard or as accurately as humans can. I would not be surprised if a large part of early human hunting consisted of throwing rocks at small animals.

    TTFN

  35. Cursorial hunting in wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found this description of the term cursorial hunting very interesting. I went and checked on Wikipedia and there was no article on the subject. So I have now created one. I welcome any slashdotters who would like to add to or edit this newly created article.

  36. Re:Bullshit on your bullshit. by snake_dad · · Score: 1

    You are likely to be eaten by a Grue

    --
    karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  37. Man beats Horse by gtkuhn · · Score: 1

    This year a man beat a horse in a marathon. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/mid/3801177.stm