Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Envision 3-D Hologram Phone

Chad Gray copies and pastes "It's an idea that was popularized by Princess Leia's plea for help in Star Wars: sending a 3-D hologram. Now, two Japanese scientists have developed technology they hope will one day turn the humble telephone booth into a high-tech chamber for beaming holographic images."

26 of 102 comments (clear)

  1. Fordet Leia; give me Amadala! by sithkhan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just imagine; I am on the phone, a call comes in, and it's Natalie Portman!!!!! Now, if they could just develop a way to teleport hot grits into my pants during this ...

    --

    is it that bad seein a hot chick again? if i see a hot chick walkin down the hall i dont say "repost"
  2. You've Got Holo! by aurifex · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess there will be a whole new phone sex business for this sort of technology, right?

    I mean, what's better than a depressed, down on life phone sex operator giving fake moans for $1.50/hr? Why, a holographic depressed, down on life phone sex operator giving fake moans for $1.50/hr!

    1. Re:You've Got Holo! by John_Booty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess there will be a whole new phone sex business for this sort of technology, right?

      Your post is very funny, but I think it's really insightful, too.

      Never underestimate the power of pr0n when it comes to pushing new technologies. The VCR, cable TV, high-speed internet access, etc... there were a lot of factors contributing to their success, but I think the availability of pr0n was a primary factor in all of them! The power of pr0n will probably make or break this holophone technology if it becomes commercially available at some point in the future.

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    2. Re:You've Got Holo! by Smiffa2001 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "It's also pricey. One cylinder costs 10 million yen ($97,100) although Tachi and Endo expect that to fall if the gadget is ever mass-produced."

      Like the parent says, the sex industry will see this one works. When those lot get hold of this, it won't cost 10 million yen for long....

  3. I want to be heard, not seen. by Doomsdaisy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I still think that this is doomed to failure as the average person doesn't want to be seen in their natural state. I just know that I'd be getting all kinds of unwanted calls from guys who stare at my source code rather than attempt communication.

    --
    These are breasts; this is source code.
    Why do you have a problem with those two things belonging to one person?
    1. Re:I want to be heard, not seen. by tonsofpcs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I do agree with this, but for the 3d design community [for movies and otherwise], this would be a great way to show models being worked on to an art director on the road without sending him/her a 3d model and requiring him/her to render, or sending a batch of renders.

    2. Re:I want to be heard, not seen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      These are breasts; this is source code.
      Why do you have a problem with those two things belonging to one person?


      We all believe in free open source here, so....

    3. Re:I want to be heard, not seen. by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I do agree with this, but for the 3d design community [for movies and otherwise], this would be a great way to show models being worked on to an art director on the road without sending him/her a 3d model and requiring him/her to render, or sending a batch of renders."

      Heck, it'd be great for those of us who make 3D models for a living! As it is, I rotate my models a LOT in order to work out that things are correct proportionally. The more detail, the slower this goes. If there was some way to 'bake' it into a 3D image, I'd be one happy dude.

      Err sorry to leech off your post, but man I do agree with you. I'm aching for a 3D printer. Not quite as cool as a hologram, but I love the idea of studying prototype models that I'm holding in my hand.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:I want to be heard, not seen. by michaeldot · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Help me debug your source code, Doomsdaisy, you're my only hope!"

  4. ONE BIG PROBLEM by Nykon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The biggest problem with video phones, and why they have never taken off in any form, in the last 10, 20 + years...

    Most people do not want you to see what they look when they talk to you. How many times have you answered the phone and just woke up? Maybe you are a girl or guy and just met someone new and do not look the way you would want to be seen in front of them? The list goes on.

    Basically, more times then not, people would turn the video option off when used in a personal setting.

    Now the only arena any type of video phone service has taken off is in business when visual interaction may help get the idea across. Though the most popular version of this concept is Video Conferencing.

    I strongly believe video phones will not take off in a non-business environment for the above stated reasons.

    --
    "It's better to be a pirate then join the Navy"
    1. Re:ONE BIG PROBLEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      Maybe you are a girl or guy

      Maybe?
  5. I want to be read not heard, let alone seen by Mr+Abstracto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The trend seems to be going in the other direction: more and more people are using text messages, a far less personal mode of communication.

  6. Finally a use for a Booth by Gopal.V · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since the arrival of the mobile phone (with the worthy hands free) , the telephone booths have been dying out (or at least its time is numbered).... Except for Ransom calls nothing else would use booths if the current trend kept up :)

    Interestingly, I think a "virtual" hologram system which'd use a 3-D head mount with all the 3D movements in software would be easier. Would be like playing an FPS , in the real world where we can walk around a "virtual" image of a real thing.

    I'd love a panorama that I can view by turning my head around (think about the IR camera system in Apache Longbow, but on a still image so to speak).

  7. Where is the picture? by qualico · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sure wish they would put a conceptual diagram or rendered picture of said technology.

    I'm too lazy with my imagination. :->
    Just spoon feed me will ya!

    We are so far behind, its too much to ask... I know. :-(

  8. This is AWESOME! by philovivero · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Now, two Japanese scientists have developed technology they hope will one day turn the humble telephone booth into a high-tech chamber for beaming holographic images.


    The next logical step is clear: move all motion picture screenings into these telephone booths with holographic images!

    Soon, movie theatres will disappear, giving way to cramped little booths with people watching movies, having to pause halfway through to step out and sit down to take the weight off their feet.

    Or, wait. Is this whole beamed holographic image thing just a big thought experiment? In that case, can't we just replace the stupid phone booth concept entirely? I mean, it isn't like we can't get throw-away cellphones for ten bucks at the corner store. Where's the forward thinking from these so-called smart researcher sorts? Porn. Naked, writhing women.
  9. May crop overweight people, may normalize width by hajihill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The viewing cylinder is about ten inches high with an eight inch circumference. That works out to roughly 2.5 inches in diameter.

    Okay, so this works out fine for people that are, let's say (the height is arbitrary, not taken from article), up to 6'2" inches tall, and are a little more than 1.5 feet wide, or 4.8 feet (about 58 inches) in circumference, but any more than that and you will have some cropping taking effect.

    In fact, would the image simply be stretched across the cylinder, or would it appear normal from different angles? In the case that it would appear stretched it would simply normalize the width of all viewed through this device. This would likely be very unflattering for most, and in any case it would be a bit unflattering for at least a few (albeit a small portion of the population if it was only the very overweight).

    Something else to consider is that over the course of human existence and the existence of communication as a whole the trend has been towards: A) less personal interaction, and B) quicker communication of details. From speaking, to writing, then Morse code, radio telegraph, then telephone (quite possibly an anomaly to this trend, but very quick, so maybe not), then email and instant messaging (the best of both worlds). It may very well be safe to assume that this won't catch on, but then again, we never know what will be deemed the most desirable in the tech world.

    --
    Of blankness, I know nothing.
  10. Old concept, new technology. by Stone+Rhino · · Score: 4, Informative

    3D viewing through spinning projections is nothing new. Viewers which utilize an upwards-facing projector and rotating screen in the center of a sphere have been around for a while. I can't find a link at the moment, but the concept is not new. It is cool to see LEDs and fiber-optics used, as well as a new real-time scanning method.

    The really cool ones, though, are the hologram techinques that use reflected light to produce an image in space. Here's a short piece from wired and an over view of some other technology.

    --


    Remember, there were no nuclear weapons before women were allowed to vote.
  11. 1 Message Received by Nik+Picker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Help me obi 1, yr R my ownly hope!

    and other bad messages heading your way soon....

    --
    And thats why Firecrackers and kittens don't mix.
  12. Scary by Claire-plus-plus · · Score: 3, Funny

    This could be used to give new meaning (and new weight) to the term "obscene phone call"! eeeeeeeew

    --
    99 bottles of beer in 175 characte
  13. Re:pricey? by bStrom · · Score: 3, Funny

    If the price fell 100%, wouldn't that be $0?

    --
    Try eMusic. DRM free, legal, MP3 downloads.
  14. Another reason why this won't take off by Ligur · · Score: 4, Funny
    One cylinder costs 10 million yen ($97,100)
    97,100 dollars? Great Scott! Wouldn't having the persons you want to have a conversation with transported to you with a chartered jet or helicopter be cheaper?
    --
    Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.
  15. Yet another by Carlbunn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Another technology that's maybe too advanced, too "gadget" or not fashion enough to be profitable. I was just reading how nintendo used network since the NES days, and every following console version had its modem (with no success). a truly sad story about ppl trying to release new tech to a public that goes: Meh...

  16. Holo phone sex by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Funny

    W00t!!! Holo pr0n! Just wait till you get to see them in 3D glory and not just hear them. But, I'm not sure if I want to spend 15 buck a minute for the 900 number call.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  17. Lot of out of business Phone Sex Operators though. by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just because a woman has a sexy voice it doesn't mean that there body matches the voice. Right now on the other side of the phone it could be a 1000lbs immobile woman answering the telephone. Because it is one of the fiew jobs she can do. No with Holographic phones she would be our of business. Plus all the extra expences of makup hair etc.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  18. What it looks like - Pic here by thecounterfeit · · Score: 3, Informative

    Engadget has a photo of what it looks like here: http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000837021481/ You won't exactly be blown away.

  19. Gah. Let me try that again. by PenguiN42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I found this photograph... maybe that will help?

    --
    The following sentence is true. The preceding sentence was false.