Slashdot Mirror


Linux Support for Wireless Laptop Internet?

scubacuda asks: "I'm looking for a good "all you can eat" cellular data plan for my laptop. So far, I've looked into T-mobile, Earthlink, and Verizon's wireless Internet options. Any suggestions on price, availability, and speed? The real kicker for me is Linux support, which, I've been told by all three companies, is NOT available. (Any and all hacks would be greatly appreciated!)" This particular market is still in a great degree of flux, especially with landscape-changing deals like the AT&T/Cingular merger going on in the background and issue of going for cellular or WiFi connectivity service. Are there any wireless carriers that you've been able to get working on a Linux laptop? If so, what did you have to do to attain your wireless laptop nirvana?

243 comments

  1. Here are my experiences! by vwpau227 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a Canadian, but I've successfully used wireless Internet connections in the U.S. using GSM (AT&T Wireless) and iDEN (NexTel) networks with a linux laptop. The idea is to think simple, and set up the wireless connection with an existing mobile phone and a PPP connection!

    In the case of GSM, all that was necessary was a USB cable to a Motorola C333 to the laptop, then using PPP over the connection. Setting up was no harder than setting up a regular modem connection. The phone was free (after signing up to a plan) and the USB cable was less than $20. Data plans vary, but GSM coverage is decent in all the metropolitan areas that I was in (including Detriot, Chicago and New Jersey).

    Similarly, I was able to use a Motorola iDEN phone with a serial cable to connect to the serial port of the computer and the specialized Motorola serial port on the phone. Once again, with a PPP connection to the Internet, there is nothing more to the connection than what's necessary to the dial-up modem connection. The phone itself is a wireless modem that is detected as a serial modem device. A data plan was included with the phone package (as I recall) and coverage was decent in all the metropolitan areas that I was in (see above).

    We tried using various PCMCIA and PC Card based solutions for our connections, but we always seemed to have driver problems both in Windows and in linux. Sometimes the devices would seem to work, and then sometimes it wouldn't. For doing demos on the road for a web application, this was not acceptable. We found the best way was to use a phone-based solution for reliability for our mobile applications.

    All in all, setting up a wireless connection is easy once you have the cables. With the price of phones these days dropping, getting your linux-based laptop (or any laptop for that matter) on the Internet wirelessly is easier and more cost effective than ever.

    --
    These are the good old days you'll be telling your children about. Make them worthwhile.
    1. Re:Here are my experiences! by rmdir+-r+* · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How much bandwidth were you getting, and what were your ping times (I've heard horror stories about minute+ ping times for certain satellite services... probably bogus, but this is /. ;)

    2. Re:Here are my experiences! by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 5, Informative

      I use Verizon "mobile office" w/ my laptop and windows XP, but apparently there's a fairly simple hack (you can google for) to get it working with linux machines.
      It's just a USB connection to the phone, and the best part is that the internet use is free, it just costs you minutes on your phone, which is great since I get free weekends and that's when I use it most.
      Sound like just what you need. Speed is about like dial-up.

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
    3. Re:Here are my experiences! by vwpau227 · · Score: 4, Informative

      In response to your question: Latency (ping times) were decent and the connection seemed fine for normal web browsing (as I mentioned, we were doing a demo a web application). We didn't do any bandwidth tests so I don't have that data, but the system seemed to be more responsive than with dial-up connection, with would probably have been the alternative we would have had to put up with, so that was fine with us.

      I've heard some others in the industry with bad luck with satellite-based system, but I haven't had those sorts of issues with mobile phone type systems. However, your mileage, as they say, may vary...

      --
      These are the good old days you'll be telling your children about. Make them worthwhile.
    4. Re:Here are my experiences! by The+Asylum · · Score: 5, Informative

      I encountered problems signing on to PPP using Nextel and IDEN - it turned out to be that the phone would try to sign on to the Nextel ISP plan via an immediate PPP connection (at $40 a month) unless you first sent an "ATZ" - that made the phone listen to the ATDT string and actually dial the number you asked for. The other problem is that you can have strong signal, but >2000 ms ping times - it can be an excruciatingly slow data link.

      --
      -- No No No NO, Don't tug on that! You never know what it might be attached to. - Buckaroo Banzai
    5. Re:Here are my experiences! by ayn0r · · Score: 5, Funny
      All in all, setting up a wireless connection is easy once you have the cables.

      Ah, yes. Wireless indeed.

    6. Re:Here are my experiences! by josh3736 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yep. I use my Samsung phone with a $14 data cable I got off eBay. The phone is connected by USB and gets recognized as a regular old modem.

      Verizon's coverage is everywhere, so it will usually Just Works®. I took a 2 hour trip and the connection was up the whole way.

      Best part is this will cost you $0 extra (unless you connect during peak hours). VZW obviously doesn't say much about this service, and as long as you're not using at as your primary connection, you'll have no problems.

      Speed is equivalent to that of a dial-up modem, but what more could you want at 80mph in the boon docks?

    7. Re:Here are my experiences! by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      For my GSM data plan (Cingular), ping was roughly 400-600ms and throughput seemed to be in the 4-6 kbps range.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    8. Re:Here are my experiences! by kaybi · · Score: 1

      Of course your getting ~2000ms ping times, curcuit data mode is only 9600bps. Try Packetstream Gold (SOC: PDSPSG).

    9. Re:Here are my experiences! by WNGA · · Score: 3, Informative

      My experience with Verizon's new EV-DO service has been amazing. On a bad day, I get 500-700kbps down, on a good day, I'm pulling 1.2MBps down, 100k up, right out of the air ... while moving in a car at 80mph ... or at the airport .. or wherever. And YES, they do have a hack which will let the aircards work under linux. Just do a google for "verizon" "linux" "aircard", you're bound to find it. It's simply amazing to be able to have a broadband connection almost ANYWHERE I go! I can wander around town, or travel across the country, and not have to pay anyone anything additional for access. The other cool thing is to see my laptop working when everyone else is struggling to find access. The only thing to note though, is Verizon is still in their deployment phase for EV-DO, so in areas that are not yet EV-DO enabled, you will fall back to their 1XRTT service (automatically). That pulls down 144k, which when compressed with their Venturi software, isn't half bad for email/surfing.

    10. Re:Here are my experiences! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, more advertisements on slashdot.

    11. Re:Here are my experiences! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing that I find to be an issue is latency. At least in my testing with Cingular on an EDGE phone, speed was good but latency always above 500 ms, usually 700-1000 ms. Web browsing this is okay, but not for interactive like ssh terminal sessions.

    12. Re:Here are my experiences! by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      As someone thats supported Satellite customers, I can say that you don't want to go with it.

      Not only is it a cashcow for the ISP, but its unreliable, even in the best conditions. Talk to anyone that has supported it and they will probably tell you that they'd rather deal with dialup than Satellite...

    13. Re:Here are my experiences! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used wireless at work to support our police cruisers on iDen (nextel) network for over a year; the phone plugs in with a USB connection & looks to the computer as if it were a modem. Just for grins I tried it on my Linux laptop & it worked without any major hitches (had to google for a driver hack). Speed roughly equivalent to dialup (19.2 average). I've set this laptop with dual-boot (WinXP is "other") and normally use a Linksys wireless PCMCIA card. By doing some finagling with the WEP key access I've got it set to float between my home network (Charter, cable, using a Linksys wireless router) and work (LAN, government IP space, Cisco WAP's) with DHCP on both; the only bodge is I have to run a /etc/rc.d/init.d/network restart every time I change networks (I've iconified a shell script for this though with a specific SUDO priv). Works flawlessly. I had a 3COM wireless NIC that I could never get a Linux driver for, but I hunted around for cards with a Linux driver before I purchased the Linksys one. Speed tests show 9-11 Mbps generally. Fedora Core2 running Gnome 2.6 with patches. Good luck!

    14. Re:Here are my experiences! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, more whining about useful information on slashdot.

    15. Re:Here are my experiences! by horatio · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm completely missing something here, but the best I've been able to get is 14.4k. I have the motorola 701c (I think thats the model) and it can do the highspeed thing, but VZW wants a ton of extra cash for that, and I'm not willing to shell out for it. Already paid damn near 80$ for the software+cable, a huge mistake.

      Are you saying there is a way to get better than 14.4 with your mobile and not having to bend over for VZW? Please, do tell, because I've been considering going to Sprint, which as I understand it, gives you ISDN-like speeds. I'm told, however, they have spotty coverage where I work near Ohio State.

      --
      There is very little future in being right when your boss is wrong.
    16. Re:Here are my experiences! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use a LG VX10(?) phone and I get 100kbps download regularly, using a standard phone plan (I pay by the minute).

      You may need to call Verizon and make sure that the high speed (1XRTT) service is turned on for your phone. Also, make sure you're calling the right number; as I recall, the connection details are different for the different speeds.

    17. Re:Here are my experiences! by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 1

      Yah my connection says 14.4 k too. But my dial up says 41k and I don't notice any difference in speed between the two when surfing or downloading. Usually about 10 seconds to load google news and download at about 12 k/sec on either one. I noticed some guy posted below that he connects at 115 k/sec through sprint for free, it has me thinking too! If I had that kind of speed on my cell, I'd prolly get rid of my cablemodem!

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
    18. Re:Here are my experiences! by horatio · · Score: 1

      If I had that kind of speed on my cell, I'd prolly get rid of my cablemodem!

      Thats why Sprint stopped selling the data cables, or so I'm told by the CSRs. Apparently they have some kind of rule against using the phones at all for modems, but they tend not to say much unless you start racking up traffic and it looks like you're using it for a general ISP.

      --
      There is very little future in being right when your boss is wrong.
    19. Re:Here are my experiences! by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 1

      So much for running my server off my HP/Linux PDA thru my cell.
      *sigh*

      Someday...

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
    20. Re:Here are my experiences! by WNGA · · Score: 1

      I'm not advertising, trust me. I have no vested interest in the company. I'm just a very satisfied customer. As with anything, YMMV, but my experience has been unbelievably positive in markets that are EV-DO enabled.

    21. Re:Here are my experiences! by cadence007 · · Score: 1

      What model cell phone?

    22. Re:Here are my experiences! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Samsung SCH-a650

  2. Boo. by Heem · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hate that something like this even need linux support. I mean, it's basicaly a modem - it should emulate a simple piece of hardware and work on any combination of hardware and software without fancy client software. Imagine if you had to have fancy client with all these unneeded bells and whistles for your 2400 Baud external modem back in the day.

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
    1. Re:Boo. by e9th · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bear in mind that, especially in laptops, even modems don't emulate modems anymore.

    2. Re:Boo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but back then the packets were already used to going uphill both ways and didn't care for a fancy client waiting for them on arrival. Bah, packets these days... GET OFF MY LAWN!

    3. Re:Boo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *SIGH*

      Such a wonderful thing existed, the Ricochet (aka Metricom) mesh network. 230kbaud, several modem options (PCMCIA card, external with both serial AND USB). It simply dialed out with a Hayes AT command set and gave you a PPP connection. Great Linux support... well, it didn't need support, it just worked. I routed with NAT for my home network before I got DSL... life was good back around 2000-2001.

      Ricochet had a big BK and left their infrastructure (mesh nodes hung from city light poles). They exist to remind me of that brief but wonderful experience of decent mobile high-speed service. Various attempts to restart the network have yet to result in my area (SoCal) going live again.

    4. Re:Boo. by jrumney · · Score: 1
      I hate that something like this even need linux support.

      It doesn't for most phones. This is just the standard response I'd expect from customer support.

    5. Re:Boo. by Otter · · Score: 3, Informative
      I hate that something like this even need linux support.

      Note that "not supported" doesn't mean "it won't work". It means "We have no idea if it works or not so don't come crying to us if you can't get your Transmeta-based sublaptop running Ubuntu to work with our network."

    6. Re:Boo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean "GET OFF MY WAN!"

      (stupid filter, of course it's like yelling, it's supposed to be)

    7. Re:Boo. by vidnet · · Score: 1
      Modems are not simple pieces of hardware, they're full, self-sufficient devices. And really, what's the point of that now that we have operating systems and device drivers? It was great back when DOS roamed the earth and software packages still were required to support the specific hardware they wanted to use, but now it's just silly.

      No hardware should emulate other hardware. Use open standards and specifications instead.

    8. Re:Boo. by Prof.+Pi · · Score: 4, Informative
      I hate that something like this even need linux support. I mean, it's basicaly a modem - it should emulate a simple piece of hardware and work on any combination of hardware and software without fancy client software.

      That would be the case if you had genuine hardware. If you actually had a modem, which is a "modulator-demodulator," you'd just talk to its serial interface.

      The problem is, most "modems," especially the ones in many laptops, cut out a lot of the modulating/demodulating circuitry, and leave it up to the CPU to do a lot of the signal processing. This shaves a few bucks off the cost of a unit, which is big in a low-margin, highly-competitive market, especially if the laptop vendor doesn't mention to the customer that his CPU will slow down every time he uses his "modem."

      Unfortunately, a lot of vendors feel that exposing the API's to their "modems," wireless cards, etc., would expose the designs to their competitors (who presumably don't have debuggers and other such tools). The annoying thing is that many of them turn around and say they can't afford to write a Linux driver to support a "fringe" market.

    9. Re:Boo. by steeviant · · Score: 1

      I've used two types of cellular data in Linux, one was a Nokia 5110, the 5110 does not behave like a regular modem, and doesn't do GPRS. It was neccessary to use a utility called Gnokii to emulate a modem, the other type was actually two different Ericsson phones, a t39m and a t68i.

      Both act like a normal modem when connected via a serial cable, and like a modem attached to a standard bluetooth serial device (though I haven't tried using bluetooth in Linux). The only caveat was finding out the AT commands to connect to the GPRS network, but it's all standard PPP over a standard (pretend, in the case of gnokii) serial modem.

      The ericssons were certainly a refreshing change from shitty soft modems that need drivers and don't work in any OS except windows. I assume there must be plenty of other cellphones out there that act like standard devices.

    10. Re:Boo. by ScottyUK · · Score: 1

      I have a Sony Ericcson T610 and it works brilliantly just like you mention; no need for any extra drivers or software, just choose from a range of "*#[number]#" style codes and it selects a GPRS/GSM profile based on whatever code you "dialled" to the phone and makes the connection for you.

      --
      Nice weather for penguins...
    11. Re:Boo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem with that is that it is not of merchantable quality (fit for the purpose), but only if you mention that is the use to which you require it.

      The only way to test that is to try to buy the item. And THAT requires to actually get in contact with them. That is often the sticking point.

    12. Re:Boo. by deuce868 · · Score: 1

      What ever happened with that? I thought some company bought up their network and were redeploying in some areas, but that was a long while ago and I've never heard anything since.

    13. Re:Boo. by Asphalt · · Score: 1
      Such a wonderful thing existed, the Ricochet (aka Metricom) mesh network. 230kbaud, several modem options (PCMCIA card, external with both serial AND USB).

      Agreed, I used to have Ricochet and miss it.

      However, I now have the Verizon PCMCIA card with broadband access. It works pretty well in Los Angeles. I happen to be using it right now from a hotel on the road in Las Vegas. 100% signal strength.

      I just pinged a major website, and got between 200 and 300ms.

      Downloaded Adobe Acrobat (19MB) earlier at an average download speed of roughly 1 Mbs.

      It costs $80/month, but if you use wireless data fairly often, it really does beat searching for Wi-Fi.

  3. SprintPCS by swordboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've found that a typical SprintPCS phone will appear as a modem when connected with the optional USB connection. If you dial #777 (which equates to #PPP), you'll be connected through the "Vision" inet service. Sprint doesn't advertise this and, naturally, doesn't want people using their "all you can eat" inet service with a laptop or desktop for that matter. The speed is underwhelming but I haven't found anything good in this respect unless you've got the new Verizon service in the select cities.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:SprintPCS by swordboy · · Score: 5, Informative
      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    2. Re:SprintPCS by Erwos · · Score: 1

      This kind of usage (phone link to PC) is also not supported by your PCS Vision contract, or so Sprint claims. If you're just using it to check your email, I doubt Sprint would ever notice, but I would think twice about downloading the Fedora Core 3 DVD over it.

      If you don't need much bandwidth, need the voice service, and can live with possibly being shut off[1], it's not a bad option for $15-$20 extra a month.

      -Erwos

      [1] Can anyone provide a link to a story about this actually happening? It seems more like a threat than a reality at the moment.

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    3. Re:SprintPCS by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      I've used this quite frequently. By no means do I attempt using it as a primary connection, but it's proven useful for checking email on the road or in hotels, and especially handy for grabbing road maps and finding Wi-Fi hotspots via Yahoo's service.

    4. Re:SprintPCS by wvitXpert · · Score: 1

      Do you know if this can be done on a Mac?

    5. Re:SprintPCS by karmatic · · Score: 1

      I've done this as well. The latency is a pain ( sometimes as high as 2.5 seconds ), but the thouroughput is nice. I've pulled 144KBps, with compression.

      I did the bandwidth test over at bandwidthplace, they refused to give me results, saying it was too fast for a cellular modem. I finally had to tell it was WIFI, and they tested me at 125KBps. Not too bad.

    6. Re:SprintPCS by dhwebb · · Score: 1

      I've used the Sprint PCS wireless pccard adapter with linux. There's plenty of info on Google about this. Works good. Seem to get anywhere from 56-128 k. Works fine with a citrix or vnc connection and checking email.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
    7. Re:SprintPCS by glennrrr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes. I do it while traveling with my PowerBook. It doesn't require any additional software and just properly configuring the phone, which appears as a modem to the Network control panel. Be sure to enable the modem menu so you can connect/disconnect manually.

    8. Re:SprintPCS by wvitXpert · · Score: 1

      What exactly would I have to do to "properly configure" my phone? I plugged it in but it did not show up in the control panel.
      Thanks

    9. Re:SprintPCS by C10H14N2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I haven't tried this under Linux, but I did some speed tests using a Treo300 on Sprint and it quickly hit 150Kbps sustained. Frankly, for the coverage area and the price (damn near free), 150Kbps ain't to shabby. Sprint are complete assholes about just saying "yes, you may use that phone as a modem and you will not incur additional charges" (I spent an hour twisting that out of them while they tried to sell me a modem card and a per-KB metered plan), even though there is no way they can tell the difference between your "unlimited wireless web" and anything you might do using the phone with a laptop. Knowing it pisses them off just makes it all the more enjoyable.

      However, I am a bit annoyed that the Treo300 requires third-party software to function as an external modem (ergo, I suspect it will be difficult under Linux). But, I can say that when they say "150Kbps," they mean every last bit of it on a sustained basis.

    10. Re:SprintPCS by b96miata · · Score: 1

      I'll second this.

      If you use it day in day out you'll get yelled at, but I and my family have used the data cables for vacations for some time. latency is 2-300ms, and bandwitdh is about ISDN level.

      Its a hell of a lot faster than any dialup I ever had, and if all you're doing is surfing run of the mill websites, it's almost indistinguishable from a basic broadband connection. I never tried really large file transfers but small ones I topped out at 8-10 KB/sec

    11. Re:SprintPCS by ExTex · · Score: 2, Informative

      I found this site helpful when setting my Sprint wireless phone up to be used as a modem. http://www.sonosphere.com/Resources/SprintPCSVisio n/

    12. Re:SprintPCS by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      ahh.. nate.. need to get those real-time boys to show up to beer meetings more often.

    13. Re:SprintPCS by pantherace · · Score: 1

      I've got it as a backup/mobile connection.

      This is similar to my experences. Generally latency is 500ms, Generally ranging 400-600ms, the highest I've personally seen is 1100ms.
      (Compared to any other type of home connection, that's horrible.) Also, TRY to have 4 bars, otherwise the latency goes way up.

      Sanyo 8100, Sanyo 4900, and Sanyo VM5040 (Whatever the one that can take video as well is) all work. Same instructions. (#777 etc) (And have the same cable interface)

      From looking at usenet it appears, or at least the general belief seems to be: There's a limit at which they flag you for watching. I've heard 150, 200, 250MB/month, after which they send a letter telling you to cut it out or buy a plan, otherwise, they will cut off your "unlimited" vision service (Which means some relatively huge rate per kb).

      Though, It's been said that sprint really doesn't care too much, provided you aren't using it constantly or downloading a lot. (Ie using maximium bandwidth, because that does effectively cut out multiple voice circuits I forget exactly what, but voice is significantly less than 144k claimed by sprint. I seem to recall 8, 16, and 24 but it's several voice lines. If it's done at night, they don't seem to care at all, durring the day on the other hand...)

      All rumors, and such. I know I've used more than 100MB/month before, and had no trouble at all. (Due to that, due to other things... yes)

    14. Re:SprintPCS by div_2n · · Score: 1

      I have used this quite a bit and have never gotten better than 56K. What phone are you using? Have you altered the settings that are widely available?

      I have also found it to be strangely unreliable on certain towers. I have not yet theorized a suitable explanation for this. But the Vision service itself is unreliable on those towers so it must be junk equipment or bad wiring.

    15. Re:SprintPCS by scottme · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you must be operating in a cell where there are few to zero other users of the data service. I'd hate to rain on your parade, but if you shout too loud about the performance you're getting, or even if you just wait for a while, other users will turn up, and before you know where you are you will be contending for the limited wireless bandwidth and seeing much lower throughput.

    16. Re:SprintPCS by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      The same applies to ANY network connection, but, thanks for playing.

    17. Re:SprintPCS by VUSE+g-EE-k · · Score: 1

      I use this feature while traveling, specifically while in an airport, rather than paying the high fees for the concourse wireless service. I get reasonable speed with my Sanyo 4900 (~3X 56K Modem speeds).

    18. Re:SprintPCS by Nimrod1 · · Score: 1

      I was given a Sprint PCS Vision Enabled "PCS Connection Card) PCMCIA to uses to connect to my job remotely.. I'm wondering if anybody tried to get this card working under Linux yet?!?

    19. Re:SprintPCS by karmatic · · Score: 1

      Treo 300, using PCSNet.

  4. Difference between support and works with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I bet if you ask them if they supported Firefox, the answer would be no, too. Support means they have easy instructions to repeat to the caller, not that other things don't work with it.

    1. Re:Difference between support and works with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly - I asked my ISP if they knew of some hot Pr0n sites, and they said they don't support that.

    2. Re:Difference between support and works with by Bri3D · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. Support means they will *help* you with any problems you may have and make it work for you(this rarely actually happens, but that's the theory). Not supported means the company isn't responsible for and won't help you with your problems, not that there actually are any problems.

    3. Re:Difference between support and works with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue is that there seems to be no middle ground. Usually it means "Will it work with ...". However, it is usually heard as "will you help it work with...".

      Frustrating.

    4. Re:Difference between support and works with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's pretty much the point the drivers for sony ericcson gc82 are available for linux through third party, but we don't have the information available to us to troubleshoot...hence it works but we don't know how to fix it for you...:)

  5. Do some research yourself first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you surf the web instead of asking us? Your question is so broad, it suggests you didn't do any research yourself. What do we look like, Slashdot? Oh wait...

  6. verizon works... by loony · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.ka9q.net/5220.html

    I have such a card and it works just fine for me... the only downside is you don't have a link stability /power display (that would be from the second serial port).. other than that, works fine, very stable...

    1. Re:verizon works... by greg1104 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm also using the Verizon 5220 and am pretty happy with it. In areas where the EVDO is strong (I've used it in Baltimore and NYC), I regularly get 300Kbps, and the reliability of the connection is average as such things go. Well worth the $80 a month to me because it serves both as a backup line to my cable modem at home should that go down and as a full solution when I'm on the road. It's also great fun to have something like this that works fairly well even when barreling down the highway; I recently submitted some work I had to get finished by the end of day from I95 at 65MPH while on a trip north.

      I used to connect over Sprint's PCS Vision network using the #777 hack through a Treo 300 with unlimited Vision use for $10/month. Speeds there were on the high end of ISDN when it was working well, but it rarely worked well. Lag in particular was extremely bad even with the average bandwidth once things go rolling was decent. It's been suggested to me that newer Treo models like the 600 are being more aggresively restricted by Sprint in regards to how you can get a cheap data connection out of them. My understanding is that they are better able to monitor high data use on the newer phones and force people over to a higher priced data plan if they find you're abusing the service. They certainly never noticed whatever I did on the Treo 300.

  7. Just hook your GPRS phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    up to the computer with a serial cable and you're done.

  8. T-mobile Aircard 750 by dingletec · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been using the Sierra Wireless Aircard 750 with Linux for over a year. I can't say I am excited about the service itself, which is supposed to be about 56k. In other words, it is slow. BUT, when I am patient, I can ssh to my servers at work and sometimes accomplish something. It works just fine for web browsing, email, instant messaging, and retrieving maps with gpsdrive.

    --
    --dingletec--
    1. Re:T-mobile Aircard 750 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      currently using mine between Oklhoma border and Dallas, TX.... got to say that it works well along the major corridors, but, unfortunately... GSM/GPRS towers have yet to appear in much of rural america... so... if you're planning on taking backroads across america... FORGET IT... however... I had GREAT signal from newton to San Antonio....

    2. Re:T-mobile Aircard 750 by dingletec · · Score: 1

      Guess I could have provided the link... http://www.sierrawireless.com/SupportDownload/ac7x 0_linux.asp This was pretty good instructions, took me about 5 minutes to get up and running.

      --
      --dingletec--
    3. Re:T-mobile Aircard 750 by drake50 · · Score: 1

      I also use tmobile and the sierra aircard 750 with Mandrake linux.

      I've got it working but the speed isn't great. I've used ssh successfully. I've had some issues with ftp and sftp which I haven't quite solved yet. I only use it when I need it and that's usually when I don't have time to solve these problems.

    4. Re:T-mobile Aircard 750 by drake50 · · Score: 1

      I should mention that the ftp and sftp problems where up only. Down seems to always work fine.

  9. T-Mobile by dieman · · Score: 4, Informative

    The T-Mobile GPRS cards usually Just Work(tm) since they use serial and the AT command set. Just have to use PPP and off you go.

    Its not the fastest, but its cheap. ($30/mo)

    Good luck!

    --
    -- dieman - Scott Dier
    1. Re:T-Mobile by killpog · · Score: 1

      So, how did you do it?

    2. Re:T-Mobile by numatrix · · Score: 4, Informative

      I actually just use my T610 bluetooth phone on T-Mobile and get a gprs connection just fine for $5/month.

      Technically, the $5/month is added on to my regular phone plan and is for the phone to be able to do mail and http itself (https, imap, pop, smtp and http being the only ports open). It turns out, with ANY t-mobile plan (as far as I've been able to see) you get port 80 access, so if you're up for tunneling anything across 80, you can do it for free with any tmo phone with data connectivity. I'm not sure whether t-mobile can't distinguish between a phone carrying data for a laptop, or simply doesn't care at this point, but it results in a darn cheap data connection.

      I have to admit, I've only done it with windows so far, but no special drivers were required, just the stock bluetooth kernel, so I'm positive it would work on linux as well.

      The phone shows up as a standard bluetooth modem and I dial #99* (or *99#, I can never remember and the laptop's off), use any user name or password and off we go.

      It's not great, however. Though the connection shows up as 115kb/s, the latency is so high that it's nearly unusable for many applications. I use it in a pinch if I have to to get on and ssh, web, or email, but occasionally the network is so flaky that it's not usable at all, so I definitely wouldn't recommend it for an always on service.

      That said, for a backup data connection plan if you've already got t-mobile, you can't beat it.

      I'm assuming the dedicated 'data' plans that t-mobile offers are using the same data network, and therefore would be approximately the same service levels, but I could be totally off.

    3. Re:T-Mobile by pinchhazard · · Score: 0

      Yep. I'm sitting in my car at a car wash right now, with the power cord from my laptop strung out my window into the AC jack at the vacuum station. I'm sending this via T-Mobile over a Sierra Wireless GPRS/GSM AirCard 750 PCMCIA card. The connection is 40kbps and I get pretty decent reception (Pacific Northwest).

      It's a snap to install and use, but then again I'm running XP.

      --
      Do you love freedom??? Do you love freedom!!! DO YOU LOVE FREEDOM!!!!!!!!
    4. Re:T-Mobile by WarmBoota · · Score: 2

      I'll second that emotion. I've run ssh and a vnc tunnel over port 443 on my T610 using a bluetooth dongle from the laptop. It's not the kind of connection you can play Doom3 on, but it gets the job done...and it's *99#

      p.s. This also works well from a Palm m500 with a bluetooth card. Nothing like getting paid to read Slashdot while your clients are running late for a meeting.

      --
      90% of everything is crap. Also, crap is relative.
    5. Re:T-Mobile by Big+Jason · · Score: 2

      I'm posting this over my T610 as we speak, but I've noticed that T-Mobile cracked down recently on what ports you can access. With the $5 tzones plan, I can only do HTTP/HTTPS now whereas a month ago I was able to do SSH as well.

    6. Re:T-Mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they did have the $5 plan pretty open for a while, then the locked it down, then they opened it back up, then they just locked it down again. Since the $5 plan also includes mail, I just run an ssh server on my box on port 143. Use shared keys with putty, and have a different saved session that is smaller and connects to the imap port, and I'm good to go.

  10. Sprint Vision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Ive been using sprint for over a year and very happy
    http://www.natecarlson.com/linux/sanyo-4900 .php

  11. My experience: it just worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got a new Panasonic Toughbook CF-T2. It has a wireless net card built in. It has no built-in CD drive, so I bought an external USB CD drive, plugged it in, put in the Suse 9.2 install CD, powered it up, and selected my install options. After an hour and a few CD changes, the system was up and running. It correctly repartitioned the hard drive so it's dual boot. It detected everything correctly. The wireless net card was detected but not activated. I used Yast to activate it, and it detected the wireless link and got an IP address. At this point there was a problem, though: the wireless card was eth1 and the Ethernet card was eth0. Even though eth0 didn't have a link, it was for some reason trying to be the default route. No problem. I just used Yast to deactivate eth0 (since I never use it) and now everything works fine.

    Oh, and I also used Yast to configure all the ACPI and powersaving features, and they work. I close it, it suspends to disk. It throttles the CPU, blanks the screen, etc, as needed. There are some bugs in the suspend-to-disk feature, though. It's usable but I'm looking forward to installing the next version.

    Summary: everything basically worked, no drivers to download, no kernel recompiles. I think it was easier than it would have been if I had tried to install Win XP. I think with Win XP I would have had to download drivers, etc. But I'm not sure; I've never tried it.

    1. Re:My experience: it just worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I hate to point out the obvious, but despite the title the submitter was looking for cellular or similar plans - not 802.11b, which is what your Toughbook has built in.

      I'm glad that everything "just worked" for you, though.

    2. Re:My experience: it just worked by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 1

      Um, he was asking for cell phone systems, not 802.11b.

      But isn't ACPI under Linux great when it works? I get ~5 hours of battery life on my Asus M2400Ne...

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

    3. Re:My experience: it just worked by dave420 · · Score: 1
      This is what really burns my biscuit. "I think it was easier than it would have been if I had tried to install Win XP ... but ... I've never tried it". If you've never tried it, SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT IT. Christ! Can you talk to your boss like that? Never try something, but tell him that it's crappy? He's not going to like you for it.

      For your knowledge, yes, you'd probably need drivers, but as every single piece of hardware out there supports Windows, the drivers will be on the CD you got with it, unless it's an older card, in which case XP will support it without a seperate disc. Set up? No. Windows has built-in zero configuration WLAN setup service, so you do NOTHING. You don't have to wonder what "eth0" or "eth1" means, what default routes are, or even what a routing table is. You just plug it in.

      I HAVE done wireless setups in Linux and Windows, and Window is the easiest by far, all because of one thing. Windows automatically updates routing tables more intelligently than Linux does, which is great for the home user. Not so great if you're setting up a router. On Linux, as you said, it still wants to route everything through eth0 even if it isn't connected.

      Please, for the love of god, only talk about things you know about. Otherwise, it's spouting endless FUD about things you're ignorant about, which is something I thought really pissed pro-linux people off.

    4. Re:My experience: it just worked by flosofl · · Score: 1

      Man. Someone needs his coffee this morning :)

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    5. Re:My experience: it just worked by dave420 · · Score: 1
      Seriously :)

      This has been bugging me since I first came to /. (I signed up in '99 first, then lost my account details). Mass hypocrisy on this damned site. If linux does something, it's automatically cool. If Microsoft does the exact same thing to the exact same people in the exact same way, it's some attempt to subvert the cause of open source, and for microsoft to eat our kids.

      Someone comes on here making assumptions about Windows is greeted as a hero, yet someone making the same assumptions about linux is branded an asshat. Am I the only objective person on this fucking board? I thought we were supposed to at least be mildly intelligent, able to see something for what it is. Apparently not.

      Anyway, flosofl, thanks :)

    6. Re:My experience: it just worked by Moofie · · Score: 1

      How do you have "mass hypocrisy"? There is no hive mind. If one person says one thing, nobody else in the community is responsible to agree.

      What you're suggesting is that there is a prevailing opinion about anything in this community. That's just as silly as assuming a given American supports the current administration. You're going to be wrong almost exactly half the time.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:My experience: it just worked by dave420 · · Score: 1
      You're saying that making assumptions about a group of things based on information and past behaviour is an inherently flawed and useless technique? That it'll be right on a purely statistical level? I hate to disagree, but I will ;)

      Are you seriously saying you think slashdot is a balanced community, where all ideas are pushed forward with the same amount of objectivity and enthusiasm? One word. Microsoft. You'll find about an 80%/20% split on that one. That's based on the sheer number of people posting massivly unobjective posts about windows et. al.

      Your analogy of the US president is flawed beyond belief. We're talking about slashdot here, a very vocal group of open source developers and their groupies. Saying they're split 50/50 about every single issue under the sun is just naive :)

      Sorry if any of this sounds rude, but finding someone who thinks the way you do about these things is slightly off-putting ;)

    8. Re:My experience: it just worked by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I think that making assumptions based on what you assume the makeup of any given community to be, and applying those assumptions to any given individual, is pretty silly.

      Statistics NEVER determine the behavior of a given actor.

      So, no, there is no "mass hypocrisy". I am not accountable to agree with what anybody else in any "community" might say.

      You assume that since I read Slashdot, I'm either an open source developer or one of their groupies. You're wrong.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  12. They always say it's not supported... by Ducky · · Score: 4, Informative

    At least for Verizon's EVDO we've got a horde of folk in our IT dept. using it thanks mostly to Phil Karn's notes on getting the card working in Linux.

    Might want to dig a little deeper and see if "no support" really just means "we don't know if it works and don't know how to support Linux." Hopefully some folks further down will have info on the other services.

    Disclaimer: I happen to work for one of the companies involved with EVDO.

    1. Re:They always say it's not supported... by sheetzam · · Score: 1

      I am using the aircard 5220 with very good success. You have to activate it with a Windows machine, but after that it works great with Linux or a Mac, for that matter. The speed is very good, and coverage in the DC area is decent. All in all, I've been very happy with it. And the best part is most distributions have everything you need built in!
      A couple disclaimers: work pays for the service, which isn't cheap. Also, it's EVDO only, so limited in it's availability, which should improve over time.

      --
      "Actually, I enjoyed this in the same vague, horrible way I enjoyed the A-Team" P. Opus
    2. Re:They always say it's not supported... by Phil+Wherry · · Score: 1

      I, too, am using the Aircard 5220 under Linux using Phil Karn's instructions.

      Verizon's 1XEVDO service has been launched in a lot of markets now. It's comparable to DSL throughput (base data rate of 2.4 megabits/second with real throughput of 300-500 Kbit/s), though latency isn't comparable to a wired connection.

      Where 1XEVDO service isn't available, though, the card *will* automatically fall back to using 1XRTT service, which is deployed basically everywhere. Data rates are much slower (144 Kbit/s base rate, with actual throughput of 35-40 Kbit/s). I don't if the previous poster has had problems with the EVDO-to-RTT fallback or simply hasn't had occasion to try it, but I've had no problems with it.

      Phil

  13. Verizon works well by Alowishus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Verizon's Broadband Access works and is widely available, and if you're a heavy mobile user you can't really beat the $79/mo unlimited usage plan. In markets with the 3G equipment in place (San Diego for example) you get the faster EVDO speeds (throughput is good but latency is still a bit high - you won't be fragging in Quake over it), and everywhere else Verizon has coverage you get good ol' 1xRTT speed which is as functional as dialup and a helluva lot more convenient.

    The AirPrime PC5220 card that Verizon provides works under Windows and Mac OS X (one of the recent 10.3.x patches included official drivers), and can be used under Linux if you follow Phil Karn's excellent writeup. Only gotcha is that you need Windows for the initial activation, but from that point on you're fine on your alternative OS.

  14. My current Wireless... by cmowire · · Score: 1

    So right now I'm using a Motorola v710 on Verizon for my wireless Internet. Using Bluetooth. Dial-up networking is one of the few things that Verizon didn't disable on the v710's Bluetooth stack. I haven't tried it with Linux, but I do know that it's basicly like having a good old Hayes Compatable attached to the computer.

    However, that only gets you a maximum 128k theoretical, realistically 56k.

    I can give you a link to the AirPrime 5220 card. That can be hacked.

    1. Re:My current Wireless... by stibles · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually it's 144kbps maximum, and I've seen 16KBps so it's not just theoretical. It's mostly a function of signal strength and I guess user saturation of the cell.

    2. Re:My current Wireless... by cmowire · · Score: 1

      OK, so I checked out the CDMA Development Group and it's actually 153.6 kbps theoretical max. We're both wrong. ;)

      But, yeah, it's user saturation and carrier configuration. You always have your main channel, but you can also have up to 16 suplemental channels.

  15. Sprint/Sanyo 8200 by Phs2501 · · Score: 3, Informative
    I have a Sanyo 8200 with Sprint, and have their Vision "Unlimited" data plan.

    It's my understanding that this setup will work under Linux. The 8200 is effectively the same as an 8100 for data access purposes.

    Note that this plan is not really "unlimited". If you use too much bandwidth they will come down on you. Also, using it with a computer is "not allowed", they want you to buy a real data plan for that. However, it works anyway!

    This setup has worked well for my needs (mostly voice service with occasional Internet access both from the phone and on a laptop). YMMV.

    www.sprintusers.com are very active user forums where issues like this are discussed.

  16. Sprint PCS - unlimited data for $15 extra by hab136 · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've used Sprint with both a Samsung 8500 and now a Samsung A500 and a Linux laptop. Just get a data cable. Linux sees it as a standard ACM USB modem (driver built into the kernel), just dial #777 and use PPP. Speed is.. well, 115k at 80mph isn't bad. :)

    Get their Vision plan, and you have unlimited data for $15/month. Just don't go crazy; there have been reports of people having their line disconnected because they were using data 24/7.

    Of course, Sprint won't tell you about this; they want to sell you a connection card and the extra phone line.

    As for reception it's simple: if you're near an interstate, it's great. If you're not, NO SOUP FOR YOU.

    1. Re:Sprint PCS - unlimited data for $15 extra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get their Vision plan, and you have unlimited data for $15/month. Just don't go crazy; there have been reports of people having their line disconnected because they were using data 24/7.

      Ahh yes, the new business friendly definition of "unlimited."

    2. Re:Sprint PCS - unlimited data for $15 extra by blubdog · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've also used a Samsung 4900 phone with Linux without a problem. I turn off graphics in my browser to save bandwidth so Sprint doesn't get upset.

      As far as the Sprint PCMCIA connection cards, I borrowed and tried both models they offer on Linux a few months ago. The cheaper card worked fine, Linux saw it as a PCMCIA modem (just dial #777). The more expensive card couldn't be recognized under Linux. Sorry, but I don't remember the model numbers of the cards. FWIW, the cards seemed faster and lower latency than going through my 4900 phone (but of course, that service costs more).

    3. Re:Sprint PCS - unlimited data for $15 extra by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 3, Funny

      Speed is.. well, 115k at 80mph isn't bad. :)

      Not surprising. The doppler effect shouldn't come into play until more like 80,000mph. At that point your wireless connection will be unusable (the data will be corrupted). Also, you might notice increased latency as you move further away from Sprint's satellites and the Earth in general.

  17. support eh? by intranetsupport · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    HEY there's this great program out there that solves all issues of lack of Linux support or whatnot... ITS CALLED WINDOWS!!!!! go get it boys and girls...

    1. Re:support eh? by SnowCrashed · · Score: 3, Funny

      Note that he said laptop "nirvana", not hell. =)

    2. Re:support eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. When will people on /. learn no one is freaking using Linux at the desktop that has any weight/financial pull. They won't spend any money making this compatible with Linux because people with money don't use Linux.

    3. Re:support eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supported by 99.999% of all viruses...

    4. Re:support eh? by pllewis · · Score: 1
      Actually, I had to find and download a driver for Windows 2k, but with an Mandrake 9.0 it already had it. Just needed to dial #777. -- I use sprintPCS

      All it needs is the ACM driver.

      My co-worker is using his a bluetooth usb dongle to connect on his Motorola 6600 on the GPRS network. My sprint is faster, but the bluetooth is way cool. Don't bash what you don't know!!!

    5. Re:support eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I have a PPC, so unfortunately I'm stuck with Linux until Windows gets decent hardware support.

  18. US doesn't know shit about cell coverage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    ' what did you have to do to attain your wireless laptop nirvana?'

    move to any country except America.

    I love it how you're so backwards with that stuff. Remind me, can I take a phone with a US priceplan into every state yet..and use it?

    1. Re:US doesn't know shit about cell coverage. by rco3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Remind me, can I take a phone with a US priceplan into every state yet..and use it?"

      Yes. I do.

      What has this to do with connecting a laptop to the cellular network? Oh, right - nothing. That's because you're a useless, hating troll.

      Get thee back under thy rock, or I shall be AGAIN forced to say "Billy Goat!"

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    2. Re:US doesn't know shit about cell coverage. by ATMosby · · Score: 1

      As long as you don't cross over a red/blue boundry. :-)

    3. Re:US doesn't know shit about cell coverage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most cellphones in the world use chipsets designed by Motorola, Texas Instruments, National, Qualcomm, Intel, etc. All U.S. companies.

      If the U.S. taxpayer didn't have to rebuild Europe, imagine what our cellphone network would look like!!

    4. Re:US doesn't know shit about cell coverage. by winkydink · · Score: 1
      Remind me, can I move throughout the EU with a single priceplan?

      It's easy to do "nationwide" when all of the nations are smaller than some of our states.

      Oh, and to answer your ignorant question, yes, you can with any major provider.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    5. Re:US doesn't know shit about cell coverage. by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      Remind me, can I move throughout the EU with a single priceplan?

      I can and have!

    6. Re:US doesn't know shit about cell coverage. by winkydink · · Score: 1
      Is it a secret or the one where you pay a gazillion euro per minute as soon as you roam out of your "home" country?

      Or, perhaps you'd like to share.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  19. I got it to work with my Xbox and Debian by billatq · · Score: 5, Informative
    I posted how to do this with a Motorola v66 on T-Mobile using Debian/Xbox Linux on my blog, but since that host is currently offline, here's the article for how I did it:

    Add usbserial
    # /etc/modules.xbox: kernel modules to load at boot time.
    #
    # This file should contain the names of kernel modules that are
    # to be loaded at boot time, one per line. Comments begin with
    # a "#", and everything on the line after them are ignored.

    loop
    input
    keybdev
    mousedev
    joydev
    sunrpc
    lockd
    nfs
    scsi_mod
    sd_mod
    lirc_dev
    lirc_xir
    usbserial # Need this to work with the phone (v66)
    The next step is to set up pppd for the T-Mobile GPRS service. I have the "VPN" service, but most users with unlimited access will have the regular one. The main difference is that the "VPN" service gets you a public IP address and must be specifically requested. In places where internet3.voicestream.com is used, internet2.voicestream.com should be replaced if this is the case.
    The /etc/ppp/peers/tmobile file:

    # File: /etc/ppp/peers/tmobile
    #
    connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v -f /etc/chatscripts/tmobile"
    /dev/usb/acm/0 # Motorola Phone Cable
    115200 # speed
    nodetach # don't fork
    debug # show debugging info
    defaultroute # set the default route
    replacedefaultroute # yes, override the default route
    usepeerdns # get the dns servers from the tunnel
    crtscts # do flow control
    noauth # no authentication required
    deflate 0 # don't compress
    asyncmap 0
    mtu 1500
    mru 1500
    noipdefault
    idle 600
    The /etc/ppp/chatscripts/tmobile file:
    ABORT ERROR
    '' AT&F
    OK AT+CGDCONT=1,"IP","internet3.voicestream.com"
    OK ATDT*99#
    CONNECT ''
    The /etc/ppp/pap-secrets file:
    (none) * password
    '' tmobile
    With that configured, pon tmobile activates the GPRS connection and poff tmobile.
    1. Re:I got it to work with my Xbox and Debian by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a perfect illustration of why when you ask them "Will your wireless service work on my X-Box running Debian?" they answer "Uh, that's not supported."

    2. Re:I got it to work with my Xbox and Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also substitute wap.voicestream.com for that internet*.voicestream.com if you just have the T-Zones service. It'll work :)

  20. Everybody I know uses the $80 Sprint plan by Harry+Balls · · Score: 1, Informative

    For instructions on how to use it under Linux, see (for instance): http://modular.fas.harvard.edu/sprint_merlin/

  21. Support is worthless anyway by doodleboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What corporations mean by "support" is one or two OSes that are standardized enough for the bottom-end support people to walk the users through simple scripts, i.e. "ensure that the computer is plugged in and turned on, click start, click setting, click network and dialup connections, etc..."

    The last Verizon tech I talked to didn't know what dhcp was. There's no way these people could deal with something as varied *nix, and frankly you don't want them to. If the hardware works and the protocols are supported you're good to go. If you have a problem reboot the modem. You won't get much else in the way of useful information of the support staff anyway, even if you are running windows.

    1. Re:Support is worthless anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those people really aren't Verizon techs(well not even techs for that matter) as with most companies they contract out tech support, if you complain enough they will eventually boot you to someone who knows something, just keep asking for a higher up until your get your need response. YMMV though.

    2. Re:Support is worthless anyway by jesboat · · Score: 1

      I once had a Linksys BEFSR11 (1-port Cable/DSL router) with a very weird problem-- TCP connections didn't work. UDP worked fine, ICMP worked fine, but not TCP.

      I tried 3 different firmware versions over a period over 2 years. By the end of it all, I was pretty sure I had a paperweight, so I called Linksys tech to confirm.

      The first thing they asked me was what OS I was using. Since I had tested it with 4 different computers collectively running Windows 2000, Linux, OS X 10.2, and OS X 10.3, I told them I had tested it with multiple computers and multiple OSs. They kept asking, I finally told them OS X. The same thing happened with ISPs (I've tried our LAN, Speakeasy, and Adelphia.) I finally told them Speakeasy. It kept going on.... TCP settings, etc.

      I asked to speak to their supervisor, they hung up.

      I called back, and told them exactly what was wrong-- TCP connections weren't working, but other IP types were, that I had tried it with multiple computers, OSs, ISPs, etc. They started asking about my TCP settings...

      I called back, and immediately asked for a supervisor. I asked her if she knew the difference between TCP and UDP. She said she did, so I told her the situation, and she agreed the box was fried.

    3. Re:Support is worthless anyway by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      The problem is that there are actually two completely different kinds of support.

      One kind is exactly what you describe. This is the "you can use whatever you want, but we won't help you unless you use the stuff we support" kind.

      The other kind is much worse. It's the kind where they say, "You must use our application which only works from an administrator account running on Windows 2000 during the full moon. You cannot use anything else, because our protocols are 100% proprietary and no open alternative exists."

      The sad thing is that many places don't distinguish between these types of support, forcing us to guess whether they just mean, "we won't help you", or whether they really mean, "you're totally screwed, go away".

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  22. For GPRS it usually works by KZigurs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually - it usually does. You have to figure out how to configure it yourself, of course - ether as an USB Phone modem or Bluetooth Modem, but apart from this all you need to know is gprs configuration parameters (gprs access *point* name, user, password).

    The best I have seen from this are motorolla phones with miniUsb connector. They have simple and proper support for usb modem.

    Those software packages and fancy config dialogs - screw them. provider can't avoid infrastructure standards, so - use them.

  23. Support has two P's by [cx] · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I hate you!

  24. LG phones kern module cdc-acm by jmkrtyuio · · Score: 1

    I just hooked up my LG vx6000 phone to an updated Debian Sarge with a usb cable. I had to download, compile and load the 2.6 kernel module cdc-acm but after that the going was easy. #777 myphonenumber@vzw3g.com vzw and I am in.

  25. Forget the cables, use bluetooth by KZigurs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And Bluetooth. I'm not avare of bluetooth support in recent linux releases, but I happily use bluetooth with my ibook laptop and Nokia 6600 wherever I go. Bluetooth defines wireless modem profile, and from there, it's a piece of cake.

    1. Re:Forget the cables, use bluetooth by Homburg · · Score: 5, Informative

      Linux bluetooth support is pretty good, I think. I'm using a Belkin USB bluetooth adaptor, connected to my Erricson T630 over GPRS. On Debian unstable (2.6.8 kernel), setup was surprisingly simple - apt-get install bluez, then set up a standard PPP connection using /dev/rfcomm0 and dialling to the GPRS psedo numbers (*98*2# means 'use the second GPRS profile defined on the phone').

    2. Re:Forget the cables, use bluetooth by blcknight · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bluetooth has been supported on Linux for quite some time and is very stable. I use it occasionally with my phone when there's no WiFi around. Pop in the bluetooth dongle, turn on the phone and run an init script I wrote is all that is needed to get it up and running. http://www.bluez.org/

    3. Re:Forget the cables, use bluetooth by yog · · Score: 2

      I'm thinking of upgrading my Palm Tungsten T to a Treo 650 (or its successor), to get rid of my Motorola Startac. Can the Treo get my laptop online via Bluetooth and DUN?

      Currently, I do dial-up networking on my laptop using my Startac and an Ositech card but it's relatively slow--19.2kbps. I have a Verizon ISP dial-up account for $10/month, just a supplement to DSL for travel purposes or when DSL is down. If the Treo can replace this Ositech/Startac system, then it sounds like a great solution, but only if I don't need to hack my Treo to get DUN working!

      --
      it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    4. Re:Forget the cables, use bluetooth by Asphalt · · Score: 3, Informative
      I'm thinking of upgrading my Palm Tungsten T to a Treo 650 (or its successor), to get rid of my Motorola Startac. Can the Treo get my laptop online via Bluetooth and DUN?

      Yes, the Treo 650 can do it. However, it is against the TOS of some service providers to use the phone as a modem unless you buy an expensive all-you-can eat data plan ~$80/mo ... so caveat emptor.

      They might threaten to cut you off, or just cut you off if they catch you - or they may do nothing.

      I've heard of all of the above scenarious happening.

    5. Re:Forget the cables, use bluetooth by ohahmisua · · Score: 1

      i thought those unlimited data plans are only $20 a month?

    6. Re:Forget the cables, use bluetooth by ohahmisua · · Score: 1

      http://www.manufacturing.net/ind/ar...201024.3to.h tml The bundle includes a Bluetooth Wireless Keyboard, Bluetooth Wireless Optical Mouse, and Bluetooth USB Adapter~ sounds like a great gift hehe. I haven't tried out Bluetooth Wireless computer accessories yet... for those who have, what do you think about them?

    7. Re:Forget the cables, use bluetooth by ohahmisua · · Score: 1

      oops gave you guys the wrong link, here's hte correct one: http://www.manufacturing.net/ind/article/NEm120102 4.3to.html

  26. Re:OT by teknurd · · Score: 1
    --

    The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese!
  27. I got it to work with T-Mobile by chenyu · · Score: 1

    T-Mobile has unlimited GPRS data for very cheap (I think it was $29.95 month). I got it working with gprsec connected to my Sony/Ericsson via bluetooth.

    A few gotchas....

    1) I had to set the gprsec to use slot 2 for the GPRS number instead of default 1

    2) There is a bug in the Sony/Ericsson stack which you have to work around if you use IRDA.

  28. T-Mobile + Bluetooth by psychosis · · Score: 1

    Just get a T-Mobile handset with the $20 unlimited data plan and a phone like the T610's successor (can't remember the model), then use a USB bluetooth adapter to dial up via GPRS. The coverage is pretty good and the speed is usually faster than dial-up.

    Overall, I've had great luck with this setup.

    1. Re:T-Mobile + Bluetooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what other gadgets do you use your Bluetooth phone with?

  29. Helpful Site by Allnighterking · · Score: 4, Informative

    One Site that could help alot.

    Linux-wireless.com More info here than you probably want, and everything you need.

    --

    I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

  30. 802.11b and linux by gtoomey · · Score: 1

    This maybe a bit offtopic, buyt I've written a 802.11b wifi HOWTO to get cheap wifi working with linux.

  31. My Friend by Apreche · · Score: 3, Informative

    My friend has T-Mobile and a Nokia bluetooth phone. He has a little USB bluetooth dongle attached to his laptop. He connects wirelessly to his cell phone with the bluetooth. Then the cell phone's unlimited data service provides the laptop with an internet connection via the bluetooth. This required no support from T-Mobile.

    He set up a page about it here.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:My Friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you use the phone and data at the same time?

  32. emperorlinux.com and vectorlinux.com good combo. by agent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.emperorlinux.com and
    http://www.vectorlinux.com

    Good combo.

  33. Bluetooth "just works" by Outlet+of+Me · · Score: 1

    I can't attest much to the PCMCIA cards because I have never used one, but I currently have the unlimited data add-on to my voice plan through T-Mobile and a bluetooth mobile (Sony Ericsson T610). Get a bluetooth adapter for the notebook and configure pretty much like a dialup device (with a little extra stuff for the bluetooth). The bluetooth stack I'm using is bluez, and there are docs available there for connecting a laptop through a cell phone connection. I think that's pretty much the standard bluetooth stack in the kernel at this point.

    The best thing about this scheme is that I got a bluetooth adapter for my PDA, and it can use the connection through the cell phone to get Internet connected too (not at the same time, obviously, but you get the idea).

    The data transfer rate is about dialup speed, about 4KB/sec. Latency is awful, about 800-1000ms, but that was my impression for all wireless cellular data services. As far as reliability and coverage, the only place I've ever had huge problems was in rural areas, but that's usually just because there's no coverage there from most carriers. But for around $20/month, the idea of being connected to the Internet just about anywhere tickles the geek inside of me to pieces.

  34. Re:Support!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Things can be overrated at 0, 1 or 2, regardless of whether they have been modded before. If you post stupid comments like that then your karma bonus is definitely "overrated".

  35. Telus w/ Aircard 555 by houseofmore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I use the Aircard 555 with telus wireless in Canada. Sierra has an "UNSUPPORTED" driver for the AirCard that took me only a few minutes to get going. The coverage and speeds telus claims are another story (only really good in major centers), but otherwise no problems.

    http://www.sierrawireless.com/SupportDownload/ac55 5_Linux.asp

    Note the linux drivers do not include support for "extra features" like voice mail etc.

  36. T-mobile by SteakandcheeseUm · · Score: 1

    I use T-mobile with bluetooth. I use the integrated Dial-In module in bluetooth on my phone to dial into WAP. It works fairly well, though it is a bit slow. I like being able to get on the internet anywhere I get cell signal.

  37. Define support... by jonoton · · Score: 1
    Support means different things to different people.

    I think support in this context means that you can ring them up and insist that they make it work. Companies just dont want to do this for linux.

    There are a couple of reasons for this normally, mainly there are too many flavours of linux, different distributions are only the start of it.

    Secondly they probably realise that the average linux user is a bit more clueful and will ask far more technical questions than your average Bangalore call centre can handle!

    What I would like for 'support' for linux is a statement to the effect "we've tested this with kernel version foo and it works ok, YMMV...." and if it don't work here's a forum where somebody might answer your question...

    Nobody seems to want to give this sort of information, or even keep the chipset in a component the same for more than a few seconds.

    <RANT>
    (Prism 54 cards prime example.... 2 cards, same manufacturer, same modle number, same PCI ID, same subversion.... Different chipset!)
    </RANT>

    However sometimes there are just commercial reasons why support is limited... a couple of LARGE companies I've had dealings with will officially support Redhat & SuSE on for their products. However all their development work is done on Debian and then ported to Redhat/Suse.

    They can't specify that they support debian because of commercial agreements!

  38. mnb Re:My experience: it just worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Many Toughbooks come with an (optional) "cellular modem" for the service of your choice. (GSM, PCSVision, GPRS. etc)

    Grandparent poster might have misunderstood the question, but he might not have...

    PS:
    Toughbooks rule!
    My CF-M34 is cool - and has lots of cool hardware hacking possibilities.
    But how do I put Linux on it? It has no internal CD or floppy, and can't boot from USB!

    1. Re:mnb Re:My experience: it just worked by rco3 · · Score: 1

      How do you put ANYTHING on it? No floppy, no CD, no boot from USB - I don't see how you can even reinstall windows.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    2. Re:mnb Re:My experience: it just worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But how do I put Linux on it? It has no internal CD or floppy, and can't boot from USB!

      It seems to require some tinkering.
    3. Re:mnb Re:My experience: it just worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can reinstall windows by:
      1.Put the laptop's hard drive in my desktop.
      2.Use a partition tool to make 2 new partitions (and leave the hibernation one alone)
      Partition 1=bootable DOS with a copy of my Win2k CD in a sub-directory.
      Partition 2=big empty space for Win2k.
      3.Put the harddrive back in the laptop - boot - and it works.

      I don't know how to do the same for Linux. I would prefer Slack on this machine, but Debian or Gentoo would do me fine also. I really just don't want Red-Hat/Mandrake or SuSe. I've never liked those three.

    4. Re:mnb Re:My experience: it just worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He had a similar machine he could put the drive in to get his base install going.
      I don't have a machine similar at all, and I don't think I am comfortable enough with Linux to modify an install from a different machine to work on this one.

      Is there a program I can run from DOS/Windows to start a Linux install if I have the CD images in a FAT directory, or in their own partition on the hard drive? I would prefer Slack on this machine, Debian or Gentoo would work, but I really don't like RedHat/Mandrake or SuSe.

    5. Re:mnb Re:My experience: it just worked by Kahm-Hime · · Score: 1

      I installed Linux and Win2k on my M34 by removing the hard drive and putting in another laptop. (A desktop adapter would also work, and can be had for ~$10)

      The X 4.x drivers for the touchscreen don't seem to have calibration working yet. (Or the fellow didn't have the calibration utility pre-compiled, and to compile his stuff you need to compile X first.)

  39. Re:Choose Verizon! by greenmars · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Verizon Wireless is non-union.

  40. Just use it by phr2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The cellular modem looks like a regular modem to the laptop. It uses traditional AT commands and there's some special phone numbers you're supposed to send it. The O'Reilly book "Linux Unwired" has a good section about this. T-Mobile seems to have the best deal going, if you're in their coverage area.

  41. GoMadic + PPP + cellular phone? by antdude · · Score: 1

    How about GoMadic? I had to configure this with my father's notebook and Palm Pilot PDA. It works, but it is very slow (dial-up speed with EarthLink and PPP).

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  42. handset cradle by sciguy125 · · Score: 1

    I suspect that you can get linux to work with one of those old cradle modem things (don't know what they're called - before my time). Then you can dial the number on your cell and drop it in.

    --
    GE/S/P a- e++ y-- r-- s:++ d+ h! X+++ t++ C+ P+ L++ E W++ w M-- V? PS+ P+
    1. Re:handset cradle by csplinter · · Score: 0

      If anyone knows what these are called please say, those things are so cool!! Just think of the possibilities!! (you could do this http://media.ebaumsworld.com/pesci1.mp3 )

      _____

    2. Re:handset cradle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      acoustic coupler

    3. Re:handset cradle by farrellj · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are called an acoustic coupler...and Konexx makes one that is aimed at the road warrior. I have one and have been quite happy with it...It claims up to 26.4 Kbps, but that is optimistic. Realisticly, it is good enough for SSHing into your server, snarfing email, and some limited web browsing. What it does give you over any cell type connection is the ablity to connect *anywhere* that there is a phone with a handset. And as I was supporting doctors, it was a good tool to have.

      URL: http://www.konexx.com/koupler.htm

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  43. Low-cost + Low-speed = T-Mobile by spiritraveller · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You didn't mention what kind of speed you require. If you're just doing the occasional checking of email and browsing only when necessary, T-Mobile is your best bet.

    You can get unlimited email and port 80 access with T-Mobile for $5/month through their "Unlimited T-Zones" service... although they only advertize it as "WAP Access". Some people report that T-Mobile is cracking down and preventing non-WAP use of port 80, but it still works for me. Check the T-Mobile board at HowardForums for more up to date info.

    Worst case scenario is that you might have to subscribe to their "Unlimited Internet" service for $20/month.

    If you need DSL-like speeds, go with someone else. T-Mobile's GPRS access is usually slower than dial-up.

    How you hook up the phone depends on the phone. All the Nokia symbian phones can hook up to a linux computer wirelessly using bluetooth. Others use cables. Here's one guide I just found using Google... there are many other's out there.

    I don't see the point of getting a dedicated pcmcia card for the connection. Even if you don't intend to use the phone, it will probably be cheaper than a PC card.

  44. nextel broadband by ddstreet · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If you live in Raleigh, NC (or anywhere in the Triangle) you can get Nextel Broadband. They just started rolling it out. I haven't tried it, but if you need mobile broadband, it's probably faster and cheaper than going through your cellphone.

    http://nextelbroadband.com

    And, for hardware, you can choose between a PCMCIA card (which probably requires Windoze drivers) and a modem with an ethernet port. I assume the modem with ethernet doesn't require any special drivers or software (although that could be a bad assumption).

    1. Re:nextel broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, it's the long-awaited, amazing FLASH-OMFG® technology!

    2. Re:nextel broadband by accessdeniednsp · · Score: 1

      please oh please, has anyone hacked the pcmcia card for linux yet!? :(

      I *DID* manage to get the the dummy_cs pc card to bind with the cardmgr services. but that was with 2.4 tho.

      is there any love from the Triangle people? :-D

    3. Re:nextel broadband by flyingfred0 · · Score: 1

      You made a good assumption. The external Ethernet modem works with any Ethernet device (I've tried it with my PowerBook and a cable/DSL router). Conveniently, the external one includes a rechargable battery that it can run on for at least an hour or two, so it's still pretty portable, though not quite the same as a PCMCIA card.

    4. Re:nextel broadband by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      reasonable price too.

      Too bad there is no service on the west coast (I work for motorola...oh well, atleast I got a discounted voice phone plan.)

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    5. Re:nextel broadband by Koshmar · · Score: 1

      The modem doesn't need any fancy drivers to work - there is a windows-only app to allow you to see the signal strength but you don't *need* that.

      The whole thing works very well inside the Triangle - driving along and checking the webcams for traffic ahead is particularly amusing (obviously the passenger checks the webcams).

      Visited a friend outside Raleigh a year ago who has this and was very jealous - wish someone'd release something like it on my side of the pond.

  45. Verizon / Motorola works great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm posting this using my Moto V60s phone connected via a USB cable to my Windows PC. I've also gotten it working using a Mac. Basically, the phone looks like a USB connected modem with its own whacky command set.

    I found a lot of information in a Yahoo group that was about this stuff. Got modem chat scripts and things like that that you need to get it all working. Can't remember the group name, but Google should be able to help.

    I get ~100kbs effective transfer speeds. I don't pay for an extra data plan, just use my existing voice minutes which include unlimited nights and weekends.

  46. T-mobile works by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 1
    T-mobile is great, no support needed. I just dial *99# on my Nokia 3650, no username or password needed. Periodically the phone will reboot, crash, or hang up, but otherwise it is serviceable. It also works fine with MacOS X.

    I'm sure that by "support" they mean some jackass in Timbuktu can walk you through a script over the phone. If you don't need that kind of service you should be fine.

  47. Re:Choose Verizon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Choose Verizon because they're Non-Union? I can agree with choosing Verizon if they're not outsourcing jobs overseas, but because they're Non-Union, um, get a clue.

    You must be a manager. Now I get it.

  48. Verizon's EVDO service is fine in Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With their 5220 card and instructions from Phil Karn it works perfectly! See: http://www.ka9q.net/5220.html

  49. not linux, but mac support over BT and serial by for_usenet · · Score: 1

    I've been able to get my mac powerbook to use T-Mobile's data service. Their service is a standard PPP access service (~ 56 K) and I was able to get it working with both a Nokia 6610 over a USB-serial converter cable, and on an N-Gage over bluetooth. The trick is getting your laptop/PC to see the phone as a standard modem. Once that's accomplished, you just dial the access number, and the rest of their system is standard enough to use. I used them as my only at-home internet access for about 2 years (didn't feel like paying an extra $50 a month when I had high speed access at work), so the extra $20/month at the time was at my price point. Service is slow, but functional. And though the lower level tech folks don't know a whole lot, at least you got a live person, and they scaled you up the levels very quickly if they could not help you.

    I just wished T-Mobile had a mobile high speed network like Verizon does. I'd much rather pay for their service and support than I do for the other communication companies I've dealt with (SBC, MCI, Sprint, Time Warner).

  50. Verizon is Unionized (reference: CNN story) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    According to a CNN story in 2000, Verizon is definitely unionized.

    The unions force Verizon to treat its workers far better than the Chinese treat the Tibetans.

  51. I've used two of them by jht · · Score: 1

    I run MacOS X, not Linux (I've got an aluminum PowerBook 15"), but I'm at least familiar with the Cingular and Verizon data services. I tried to use T-Mobile's service a year or so ago with my old T68i phone, but never got it working. But that was also in the 10.2 days - 10.3 is slicker.

    Cingular's service over a cell phone is called MEdia net, and unlimited GPRS usage is an extra $20 per month. Speeds are poor (about a perceived 70k at peak), but you can use it virtually anywhere you get a GSM signal. I used it with my old T610 phone via Bluetooth, and it was a useful "last resort" way out to the Internet.

    Verizon gives you all you can eat of their data network (currently 1xRTT in most areas - about 80-140k on average) for $80 per month. They're in the process of upgrading that to 300k baseline (what they call EV-DO) with bursts over a meg. They sell a PC card to do the work for you that supports both networks. Check their website to see what speed is offered where - currently I'm at the slower speed here in Boston. However, even the slower speed is faster in real-life performance than Cingular's was.

    I'm pretty sure both can be used with Linux, though I can't tell you how. MacOS X has the necessary drivers for both the Audiovox 5220 card that Verizon provides, and for the PPP scripts needed to use your cellphone on Cingular's network.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    1. Re:I've used two of them by twenex · · Score: 1

      I also use Verizon (Mac OS X, bluetooth to Mot V710 phone) with 1XRTT. It works great. It's worth noting however, that you don't need the $80/month plan. It will just eat minutes out of your regular voice plan. Perfect for those of us for whom this is a "last resort" after home or work broadband or roaming 802.11.

    2. Re:I've used two of them by jht · · Score: 1

      I considered one of those options, but I'm using Cingular for my voice (as well as my wife and her parents - we're on a FamilyTalk plan). I figured I could save some money most months if I went to a minutes-based plan, but I'm doing this as a work thing and I like the predictability, since I never know whether I'll have access by any other means. Until I have a staff someday back at my office to keep track of things for me, it's just me. So I could be on it for 25 hours, or no hours. It all depends on the firewall policies wherever I may be that day...

      But whatever billing plan the poster chooses, it's still the same service, and pretty darned good. Have you been able to try the EV-DO yet? From those who've used it so far, I hear it's the absolute shiznitz. Rumor has it Boston gets switched over in about another month.

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    3. Re:I've used two of them by billatq · · Score: 1

      I currently use a Motorola V66 with a $5 cable I got off of eBay with the T-Mobile services via Mac OS X. Works great.

  52. Are you looking for support or functionality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you're looking for support, you're screwed.

    If you're looking for functionality I have written documents for my company's knowledgebase.

    I do work for a large wireless carrier, and I have made this information available on my personal website as I haven't yet received approval to make it available on our external support site and can e-mail you my url(will not post it to avoid being slashdotted)if you want e-mail me at chiane25@hotmail.com if you are interested.

    Methods of tethering I've written about are IrDA, bluetooth, PC Cards(all that we sell) as well as USB.

    I really should create an account on slashdot to rake in some karma.

    1. Re:Are you looking for support or functionality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations, you just spamdotted your email-account.

      Happy Thanksgiving!

  53. Suport? by dingDaShan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Suport me in my quest to make the english language even more less intelligible...

  54. viruses, spyware, bugs, and crashes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good luck using a closed-sourse proprietory Microsoft OS... after years of frustration I am happily using Linux now and have no complaints about support whatsoever.

  55. Free, unlimited GPRS on TMobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's true, I'm doing this right now. Great if you only need port 80. It's easy to configure:

    http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2003Dec/bpd200 31 205022950.htm

    1. Re:Free, unlimited GPRS on TMobile by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      i've been trying this every few weeks ever since I got my T610 with no luck. I get as far as connection established, 115.2kbps, to the *99# number, but I can't do shit after that. Everything just times out.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  56. Verizon by Chaos+Engine · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use a Samsun a530s from Verizon and it uses the standard ACM drivers under linux just fine. If you can find a verizon phone with the 1x icon on it, you should be able to do 240kbps over their 1xRTT network (look at their National Access map).

    I got my cable from Radio Shack, see http://www.howardforums.com/ for more info on the phones that are compatable.

    --
    And then he did that thing with that stuff and it was like, wow...
  57. It definitly works with linux! by alpha · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've used a Sierra Wireless AirCard 555 (verizon wireless) with linux. Although they claim the card is 144kbps, the ping round-trip time is pretty slow, and makes sshing pretty unpleasant.

    After initializing the card for the first time (using windows, it needs to update the firmware, etc.), the card works like a regular com-port/modem. Beware of wvdial though, i had to patch it to make it work reliably with the AirCard. Also see http://centerclick.org/aircard555/

    I recently dumped the aircard and replaced it with a GSM phone Nokia 6820. Which not only has a fold-out QWERTY keyboard, both a commercial and a free ssh client, and bluetooth, but also an IR port which emulates a modem when put next to the IR port on a laptop. Then just dial *99# and you're in business, even when traveling abroad. (The AirCard doesn't support data calls outside of the US.)

    I think it's a better deal than the dedicated wireless cards, unless you're planning on using it constantly. It appears that the speed on the 6820 (with AT&T / Cingular service) via IR is better than the AirCard too.

  58. my experiences... by vsigma · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I got the T-Mobile unlimited data plan, and I have a Sony Ericcson T68i phone (I'm in the NYC area, so coverage is quite good in the area).

    What I do is connect my t68i via the serial cable or bluetooth to my laptop. and use it as a modem that way, havent had a problem in the major areas...

    My only wish is this: I can actually use my cell phone as a actual modem, and not have to depend on the network's gprs service (My regular mobile is off ATT/Cingular, and they charge by sheer data used). While I realize that this is in a way odd and also not feasible simply because of how the signals are transferred - i long for an old school acoustic coupler kind of thing, since i get free night/weekends on my regular mobile, and it would be nice to able to use that for that particular service when i'm traveling about.

  59. Bluetooth for the win by meatspray · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a 6620 and a belkin adapter on my pc. ATT/Cingular GSM Edge isn't wonderful but it's the best thing I've had since riccochet dropped Baltimore coverage.

    I do seem to get around the 40Kb / second they advertise with the edge service if I'm not driving. My pings are consistant with dialup.

    The ATT/Cingular coverage is a shade better than T-Mobile in my neck of the woods. (I started with T-Mobile and had no service in my appartment)

    It's not replacing my cablemodem anytime soon for the house but it's incredibly useful on the move. My next project is to put a bluetooth linux box in the car and play around with some GPS, net wired crosshair on a map i'm over here kinda fun.

  60. Re:Choose Verizon! by pegr · · Score: 1

    Verizon Wireless is non-union.

    And Verison ranges from "mildly better than a dial-up" to "this sucks". I use their PCMCIA modem with a "all-you-can-eat" plan. Service is spotty at best. Lately, I've been getting strange delays/failures that seem DNS related. Ping times to their own DNS servers (when I can ping them, ehe...) is 500ms to 900ms. It also appears that the driver downloads the firmware to the card at boot, so good luck getting a linux version.

    Sometimes, when I'm running downhill with the wind at my back, I get close to ISDN speeds. That's the exception, not the rule. I do have to say it's pretty freaking cool to jump online where ever I happen to be. If the service was more reliable, I'd recommend it.

    For what it's worth...

  61. Call everyone and ask by bluGill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everyone who is interested in this should call ALL providers before doing anything to find out. The answer will be no, but the goal is to make our voice heard. The squeaky wheel gets the grease. Yes I know the guy on the other end of the line rarely collects these statics, but you never know when you talk to the one guy who will be asked. Once management hears that the question comes up they start keeping track of how often it comes up (this will happen withing warning so we don't slashdot their phone lines). If there is enough people calling, the message will be recieved. Make sure your voice isn't lost.

    If you get this working on an unsupported network (your only choice now), and suddenly it stops working with linux (make sure it is something they did, and not your mistake - check with others!), then it is time to slashdot their support lines, and don't accept "not supported" for an answer, talk to management (even though it is the guy at the next desk), and keep screaming. When nobody on a "supported OS" can get though because they broke the "unsupported OS", they will change.

  62. AT&T Edge w/Ericsson: WORKS by The+Man · · Score: 1

    The Ericsson pc card presents a standard serial port interface to the user, and a quick google will get you the needed commands and modifications to pppd to use it. I have done this with 100% success. Performance is roughly what you'd expect from a 56k modem; ie, not great, but it does work in a lot of places where no other connectivity is available.

  63. ETHERNET! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why they use any sort of proprietary connection instead of standard ethernet is beyond me. This would completely eliminate any need for them to write or distribute proprietary software, and would in one stroke provide compatibilty with pretty much any computing platform.

  64. Linux support is easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Just set it up as a serial modem connection on one of the pcmcia AirCards that all of those providers have available. Its a great solution I've used for over 2 years.

  65. Oh man.. by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    Please tell me someone else caught the "Suport" spelling of the article title before I did.

    --

    Question everything

    1. Re:Oh man.. by jacobhoupt · · Score: 1

      Thank you for beating me to it. Luckily, I watched Mystbusters, so I wasn't the first.

      --
      -- the only good thing the French ever did was two chicks at one time
  66. If it can't boot from a CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how do you install ANY os on it? I assume you went into the BIOS and controlled the boot order? Can it network boot? If it can network boot you should be able to install Linux from that. Can it boot from a USB flash drive? You could probably install Linux from that too.

  67. You lost me right there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You lost me when you said "I'm a Canadian"!

  68. Re:SprintPCS -- Even works in Windows!!! by pllewis · · Score: 1

    Hey, this even works in windows. I've been using it for for a while now in linux, and didn't want to purchase some software, so I found a driver on the web to work with win2k and just use the dial up connector. Oh, by the way, mandrake 9.0 and up have never needed a driver. Kinda funny. I found this incredible useful just recently while house hunting in VA. My wife was on the laptop looking up houses, mapquesting driving directions, and checking email. My only complaint is the battery loses charge in about an hour. You would think the usb would charge as you go. Sony VIAO PCG-Z505 P2-366 384M-Ram Mandrake-9.0 SprintPCS Sanyo SCP-8100 with usb cable purchased at Radio Shack

  69. _Linux_Unwired_, published by O'Reilly by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Linux Unwired, written by Roger Weeks, Edd Dumbill, Brian Jepson and published by our friends at O'Reilly, is an invaluable reference for anything that is Linux and wireless. It has several chapters on 802.11 (picking a card, setting it up, using security, setting up or building a Linux access point), and also covers a variety of other systems: Bluetooth, IrDA, cellular networking, and GPS. Their wireless chapter gives instructions and suggested equipment for (IIRC) AT&T Wireless, T-Mobile, Verizon, and possibly one or two others. It's reasonably priced, and chock full of useful stuff--I would definitely recommend picking up a copy of it to learn how to do this.

    (Note: I am not associated with O'Reilly in any relationship other than being a satisfied customer.)

    --

    Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

  70. Linux laptop w/ Cellular Internet by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I did this 3 years ago, for a cross-country drive (Tampa, FL to Los Angeles, CA, 2500 miles, 2.5 days). I wanted to "broadcast" my drive, so I had my Linux laptop capturing from a webcam, and sending the pictures back up to my web server.

    I used the Nextel im1100. The speed wasn't great (or even good most of the time), but it let me get the images up slowly. I could get one frame every 5 to 10 seconds sent up, which was more than enough to entertain my friends, who would check up on my progress every few hours.

    You have to do a ppp script, just like you would dialing up on a conventional modem to an ISP. The init string was something odd. I think it was AT&S0=0 . The dial string was simply "ATDT". If you search around on DejaNews, you can find the right init string, if I'm mistaken.

    There are other providers who's modems work exactly the same way. When I was researching it 3 years ago, they all acted like serial cards. I picked Nextel, because I already had a couple cell phones with them, and I could simply add it to my account. I don't know if things have really changed, but when I was looking at them, they advertise a "max" speed, which is *MUCH* higher than your real connection speed. In other words, you'll never see the speeds they offer. Generally it'll be 9600 baud, with really bad latency. 400ms+ pings were the norm.

    Nextel will tell you specifically that they won't work on anything but Windows, but trust me, it works fine. It's the difference between what the support people know, and the way it really is. :)

    The im1100 has it's own battery, it doesn't depend on the laptop for power. For my drive, I had the laptop and the modem plugged into a power inverter. I got pulled over twice on that drive. The cops gave my setup a really funny look, but didn't really say anything about it. Oddly enough, driving 2500 miles, you really start questioning if the speed limit should be so low..

    I kept asking myself, "My car can easily do 160mph. I'm doing 75mph. If I doubled my speed, I'd cut this drive time in half. It's 800 miles to the next state. At 75, that's 10.6hrs. at 100, that's 8hrs. At 130mph (a nice cruise speed for my car) that's 6.1 hours. 6.1 hours sounds a lot better than 10.6 hours."

    Right about the time I'd start trying it, is when I'd get pulled over. Since I was on I-10 in fuckin' Wyle E. Coyote country, where the cactus outnumber the humans 100000:1 they were ok with my 5mph over. They just wanted to remind me to slow down. I'm good with that. I like warnings a lot more than tickets.

    Oh, and if you try to figure out my average speed for the drive (41mph), I did stop in El Paso for 12 hours, and had 6 fuel stops (4 of them I was kinda fuzzy from lack of sleep and a constant caffeine buzz). I also hit shitty traffic in San Antonio, and tried to stop in Bum-stick Arizona for cigarettes (couldn't find my brand), and again in Phoenix (again, couldn't find my brand). I was twitching by the time I got to California, and it was 2 days to find a store that had my brand.

    It's an interesting drive. Everyone should try it once by themselves, just to say they did it. :) Oh, and never drive it in a U-Haul. It took 5 days with only one real sleep stop.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  71. Seattle - Dwtn Library super fast wifi by infonography · · Score: 1

    I am running a panasonic toughbook. LT modem onboard and wireless card. If I really want fast wireless net I go to the Seattle Public Library and get online free. No reg no pass, 802.11b - I downloaded three ISOs of Solaris 10 in about 90min. Our Tax Dollars well spent!!! The rest is by various net cafes w/ free wireless or from wifi dsl at home. The bulk of the posts here are modem by cell or some variation. If I want to just check my mail - modem is enough. If I want downloads, I just need to pick my time and place. I could spend a week connected 24/7 to download a CD ISO or just get coffee and in the time it takes to drink it, get that big file.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  72. Lack of Linux support usually not a tech issue by potus98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My experience with 3 different Internet connection providers has been that NONE of them had stated support for Linux. Linux as an unsupported platform for [fill in ISP here] is usually not a technology issue; rather, it's a tech support issue. Their techsupport staff needs to be able to walk Joe Average through 10 easy steps of "click this, click that, etc..." Troubleshooting via Linux would require one of two things: A) Far more complex read-response scripts. Or B) Far more educated techsupport staff. Neither seems likely to happen.

    My latest foray into high(ish) speed access at home resulted in yet another frustrating conversation: (I suspect the situation is similar for cell-based access.)

    What's my PPoE connection information?
    Huh? I need to login to your PC to complete the setup.
    No you don't, I just need the connection information to put in my firewall.
    The firewall is on your PC. It doesn't matter.
    No, the firewall is a dedicated piece of hardware.
    Sir, if you'll just let me use your computer...
    [I log him into a linux shell...]
    Uhhhh, we only support Windows. I don't think this computer can connect to the Internet. Has it logged into the Internet before?

    [rant]Why does everyone think you log-on, log-into, or log-onto the friggin Internet?!?[/rant]

    The un-supporting meat bags answering the phones have NO idea what a default gateway is (nevermind the knuckle-draggers they send to connect it), yet they are responsible for troubleshooting network connectivity! That is why so few service providers "support" Linux. The sad thing is, they could really save themselves a lot of grief if they would just put the 4 or 5 nuggets of useful information we need in the initial welcome e-mail. Instead, they bury the meaningful info in 40 pages of screen-by-screen click fests. Finally, on page 34 I find what I'm looking for: The IP of their DNS server! Yipee! Now it's back to my welcome e-mail to search for my login ID amongst 6 pages of marketing bullshit.

    --
    This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
    1. Re:Lack of Linux support usually not a tech issue by multipartmixed · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Uhhhh, we only support Windows. I don't think this computer can connect to the Internet.

      A support technician of suspect intelligence once told me (and I quote): "I'm sorry sir, Suns don't work on the internet".

      This was a Sun Enterprise 150 server; about 1999 -- when every third commericial on TV was "Sun: we're the dot in .com"

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  73. AirLink by certsoft · · Score: 1

    I have a customer who uses Raven CDMA modems on Verizon's network. He uses these like normal modems using a PPP connection to get data from earthquake recording systems, either intermittant connections or nearly continuous. The modem connects via serial at 115200 baud and he is getting around 10K Bytes per second throughput. Since it pretty much looks like a hayes modem, it doesn't matter what operating system you have on your laptop. I have absolutely no idea what the equipment or service costs are.

  74. Sprint pcmcia card by bobhodgen · · Score: 1

    I've been using the Sprint Merlin C201 pcmcia card with linux with no troubles. I found the card on sale for $29 in a Tiger Direct catalog along with an unlimited data plan for $89 per month. I took the ad to the local Sprint store and they matched the offer and gave me the card and unlimited data plan for that price. It's for commercial users only, but I have a web business (ahem). The plan is not cheap, but since I'm on the road 50% of the time, it saves me $ over hotel connect charges. A couple of links on the merlin card and linux: http://modular.fas.harvard.edu/sprint_merlin/ http://www.tummy.com/Community/Articles/merlin-c20 1/index.html

  75. at&t wireless by nyquil+superstar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm actually using a SonyEriccson GC83 with AT&T Wireless (soon to be Cingular Wireless) to post this right now. I can't comment on its Linux compatability (on Win2k w/ the work laptop), but I doubt it works because it seems to require this strange AT&T software (which is actually pretty nice, let's you control VPN connections eand everything form inside it). Overall the service is pretty quick; I get sustained d/l rates of about 20k per second. Latency seems pretty high though, although I don't have any numbers to back this up. It's about $70/month for unlimited data. Good luck!

  76. Lern 2 spel, dum as. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    Why don't you Jack Hasses learn how to spel, damnit?!???!!!???!?! The word "Support" has TWO P's, not one or three or four but TWO!! TWO P's! What am I supposed to do with an empty case?!???!?!

    1. Re:Lern 2 spel, dum as. by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      Jesus, I don't know whether to mod up as funny or mod down as troll... The 5th Element reference has gotten me all confused now...

      *click* *post*

      fuck... well I guess that's no longer an issue..

    2. Re:Lern 2 spel, dum as. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
      The 5th Element reference has gotten me all confused now...

      I seriously didn't think anyone would catch that... :-) Good job!

      AKNOT: You asked for a case. We brought you a case.

      ZORG: (shouting) A case with FOUR STONES IN IT! Not one! Not two or three! But four! Four stones! What the fuck am I supposed to do with an EMPTY case?

      AKNOT: We are warriors, not merchants!

      ZORG: But you can still count! Look... my fingers. Four stones, four crates... Zero stones... (yelling) ZERO CRATES!!!

    3. Re:Lern 2 spel, dum as. by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's a great movie... although he doesn't say "the fuck" and it's "Look... it's easy (holding up fingers)"... :)

  77. Verizon and Linux by aguilarojo · · Score: 1

    Verizon says that it doesn't support Linux, but I run Linux all the time on Verizon's DSL and it's just fine. Verizon also says that it doesn't support MacOS 9, but I occasionally have to access Flash based sites via Explorer. It works fine then too. If you understand what Linux expects and what Verizon expects then setting the correct parameters at the appropriate places is not a problem. A challenge, perhaps, but not a problem. A disciplined thinker can do it. I know, I know...some people are really sensitive about not thinking or being identified as non compos mentis, i.e., as being among those who choose NOT to use their mind. These just want to push this button or that and just have it work. They wish to think of nothing, they wish to NOT THINK AT ALL. That's ok for the many who wish to imitate the rest of the natural world but it is not ok if one identifies oneself as a human being utilizing technology. Utilizing technology of any sort requires thought and planning. So what if Verizon doesn't support Linux...you, as a Thinker, support yourself! Let the rest forage and herd as they will.

    --
    Mitakuye Oyasin: Translation from Lakota Sioux, "We are all related."
  78. Re:In Soviet Russia... by John+Pliskin · · Score: 1

    Hell in both countries packets carried porn where your computer was, and then you got off. ....yea, bad joke.
    $

  79. Cingular MediaWorks / Sony Ericsson T616 by flyingfred0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been happy using my Sony Ericsson T616 and the Cingular MediaWorks Package (costs around $20/month, see https://www.cingular.com/media/media_purchase).

    I get unlimited data, so I don't have to worry about a per KB charge, and I've been able to get coverage anywhere I can get a signal from Cingular. The downside is that it's slow (dialup modem speed, at best), but that's still good enough for checking e-mail or looking up maps or phone numbers when I'm out on the road.

    I usually use it over Bluetooth from my PowerBook, with the following settings:
    - Phone#: *99***1#
    - User: wap@cingulargprs.com
    - Password: CINGULAR1

    I've also had success using it over a serial connection to the phone, through a cable similar to this one:

    http://www.cellphonemall.net/wireless/store/access orydetail.asp?id=24792&phoneid=238

  80. Sprint PCS with Merlin C201 under Linux by jafo · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been using the Merlin C201 PCMCIA card under Linux for nearly 2 years now. The card shows up as a regular modem which you run PPP on. I've got an extensive page on how to do this setup at http://www.tummy.com/Community/Articles/merlin-c20 1/.

    The service is through Sprint, and costs $80/month for all "you can eat". Apparently, the service agreement for the $10/month net with your phone prohibits the use of a laptop with it, but there are people using USB adapters or similar to access the net over the phone. The setup is similar to the PCMCIA card, using PPP.

    I also have a page on using the LG-5350 phone and USB cable to get net access using PPP with Linux at http://www.tummy.com/Community/Articles/lg5350/

    Sprint coverage is pretty good. The first trip I took with it was up into the mountains, where I was able to get extremely good coverage from my camp site. Another crowd would wonder WTF I was doing with a laptop when camping, but the /. crowd will understand, I'm sure.

    The speed is pretty good. I can do downloads at 12 to 15KB/sec, and at one point while camping I ran an incremental backup of my laptop up to a my server. I think it pushed 600MB of data across it, uploaded, at 7KB/sec average.

    The real killer is the latency. It runs, on average, 500ms (half a second). For web page downloads it's not so bad, but for anything interactive it's pretty nasty. Latency usually ranges between 250ms and 1000ms, but if coverage lapses or is spotty it can be several seconds.

    That said, I love the connectivity. These days you can get WiFi in most locations if you are willing to go to a place that has it. The CDMA is great for times when I want to use the net from a place that doesn't have it, or a place where their WiFi is wedged because of a flaky AP or a butt-head with a virus or running file sharing.

    Sean

    1. Re:Sprint PCS with Merlin C201 under Linux by aminorex · · Score: 1

      > These days you can get WiFi in most locations if you are willing to go to a place that has it

      Yeah, Sean, I can dig that. And when you get there, there you are. Whoa.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  81. FreeBSD by Big+Jason · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm able to connect to T-Mobile's GPRS service in FreeBSD 5.3. It's about as fast as a 56k modem, but it works well when you have little choice. The FreeBSD Handbook has a nifty Bluetooth section which among other things explains how to use the Dial-Up Networking service profile.

  82. Here's the dirt, I'm a vet and have done these by Chuqmystr · · Score: 4, Informative
    First off, all of the services you mentioned DO work under Linux. In fact, Earthlink is just repackaged VZW 1X data services. VZW/Earthlink: The Audiovox 3220 and 5220, the later being an EVDO (320 Kbps) device, both work well under Linux and OS X (I've used the 3220 my last job working for VZW supplied me on both) and information on how-to is easily found via our pal Google. Tethering (using a data cable or bluetooth to establish a PPP connection, much like a dial-up modem), for the most part, seems to work well on Linux and OS X with most handsets. On LG phones beware the straight USB cable and go for the USB-serial converted type. $20 at Radio Shack or less on line from Futuredial dealers. /dev/ttyUSBx is your device. Also set the handset for serial and not USB data. The LX3100 is serial only. Motorola is the exact opposite and uses the acm module. The V710 supposedly tethers fine under bluetooth and can also use the acm module and a cable. Samsung, Sanyo and Audiovox all do acm for the most part unles your handset is beyond two years old. As for support from VZW, they can barely do it right on windbloze. Don't say Linux or Mac OS X in their presence or you may give them fits or get some government agency called upon you under suspicion of terrorist activities. VZW has great coverage and their 1X service feels about as good as 56k dial-up. All-you-can-eat is $80/mo. They have the faster EVDO up in 11 US markets and all international airports and at no additional cost.

    T-mobile, my carrier or choice, works as well. YMMV handset to handset but there's TONS of stuff out there on how to tether GSM handsets to most OSes. They offer GPRS service at $20/$30 per mo. unlimited web and mail only/full unblocked usage respectively. It's a bit slower than 1x - feels about like 33.6 dial-up. Honestly, sometimes, it can feel excruciatingly slow. Try killing the connect and redialing. That often cures it. But hey, it's ALL YOU CAN EAT at dial-up prices almost and not $80 a month. I use it with my ibook or pda on the train from San Bernardino area of SoCal to LA on my daily commute and can reliably stream 24k music streams and surf and email just fine. As for tethering, to date I've used an S/E T68i, unlocked S/E 637, Nokia 3650 and now I'm trying a Motorola unlocked V551. I've used them all via bluetooth on both OS X and Linux and a couple of those on windows. Also on Palm and PPC. As for support Tmobile has a fairly knowledgeable group. They seem to work both state-side and off-shore using a tier system. The t1-t2 group seems to be off-shore, are very helpful, still hard to understand at times and the t2's seem very knowledgeable. None of them will ever hesitate to escalate your call. The T3's will basically go to all ends to solve something. I know, I stumped one. I figured it out myself and called him back and gave him my findings. He seemed happy to hear it. Basically, they seem to honestly care about customer service. As for Linux support I think if you push the issue you might get help. Just go in with the ability to help them help you. Make them feel confident that you can translate the Mac and windows way of doing things into what you need. Their coverage isn't as good as VZW but is good enough where I use it. Farthest I've tried it was Cedar City, UT with decent coverage from here to there.

    Most important thing to remember. If you're going to get on a contract I strongly suggest that you do all of your research for the how-to's up front. Get the equipment all at once and get it going as fast as you can. The reason I say that is most carriers give you a roughly 15 day try-out before you must commit. Getting it all to work is half the battle. The user experience with the working product and getting comfortable with that is the rest of it. You may also want to consider Cingualr. Good network but they also charge $80/mo. for all-you-can-eat. However, they do support data useage over pre-pay. Only one I know of in the states. It's $0.02/kb though so be careful. A $50 card will be good enough to get

  83. Verizon and Samsung A650 by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

    I've been able to get connectivity on my Linux laptop with Verizon and a Samsung A650 phone. Even been able to put on a custom MIDI ringtone with BitPim.

    Some specifics about set up can be found here.

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  84. Fedora + Alltel by Donkey5555 · · Score: 1

    Im using Alltel with a Motorola V60i cell phone and aftermarket USB data cable. This phone has the capability to act as a USB modem which I have gotten working in both Linux and Windows. Then I simply dial into the ISP i get for free from my school, using my regular wireless minutes (hopefully offpeak). For windows I googled for a motorola usb cell modem driver and found one to support the v60i. In fedora i set up a ppp conection using /dev/ttyACM0 (you need the cdc-acm module, plain acm on redhat). Yes these connections are painfully slow but i just use it for emergencies mostly anyway.

  85. Linux support for Verizon WirelessBroadband by Phil+Karn · · Score: 1

    I have a web page with information on how to get the Sierra Wireless 5220 PC card working with Linux. The 5220 is, at present, the only supported device on Verizon's WirelessBroadband service (their name for CDMA 1xEV-DO).

  86. I just wrote up my experiences with it... by WildBill1941 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I dumped my notes to my blog. I use an Ericsson T616 under AT&T's service. Works well enough. The solution I came up with involved horking a few scripts from Knoppix (thanks to Kyle Rankin for the excellent book Knoppix Hacks, which inspired me to try using GPRS in this manner. Made life real easy as I didn't have to mess with PPP chat scripts and the like - yuck.

  87. Option cards ? by dago · · Score: 1

    I don't know exactly which networks you are using, but I already used without any problems cards made by option (option) to connect to GPRS & UMTS networks under linux.

    You just insert the usb-serial module with the good parameter and you have access to a serial modem.

    Howto and utilies can be found here:

    This card (should) work with any GSM(/GPRS/UMTS) network worlwide.

    As a bonus, some verions can also have a wireless LAN module, which is more difficult to configure.

    --
    #include "coucou.h"
  88. Verizon and their Air Cards by Bruha · · Score: 1

    If you want easy linux support the Aircard 555 and the 5220 both work under linux.. there are many tutorials on the net... only issue is that you have to activate it on a windows machine.

  89. 3G Wireless on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm in the UK and use the Vodafone 3G card. Pretty easy to set up (PPP) and it downloads at 400 Kbit/sec ! latency is acceptable as well. OS is Linux Ubuntu.

    1. Re:3G Wireless on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      any +cgdont commands?

  90. Re:Verizon is Unionized (reference: CNN story) by Professor+Bluebird · · Score: 1

    This is Verizon the telco that is unionized. Verizon Wireless is a seperate company, jointly owned by Verizon proper and Vodafone (I think).

  91. You pretty much have to roll your own by Sai+Babu · · Score: 1

    linux support.

    I got my SPRINT CDMA2000 card going, back when they were first introduced, by firing it up in W2K and then reading the connection log.

    Discovered it was straight PPP.

    Had no support for signal strength other than looking at dropped packets.

    SPRINT was running brain dead transparent cache at the time and caching box would soak the upstream side of their network.
    BR>When they added fee off peak calling, the network was so saturated that I had trouble getting a call through, nevermind data (lowed QOS priority).

    I dropped the thing after a few months of fighting with SPRINT ("we don't cache", right, I watched it from my own server! "we don't implement QOS", jeez guys, the guys who sold ou the system advertise it as a feature holding you out as an example!).I understand they have much better service now and know a good many folks using them with linux. I've lost my incentive. I was trying to talk the rapid transit people into putting a PeeCee wwith SPRINT card and 802.11B on the busses to encourage ridership. Figured if people could take care of email on their way to work, they might be more inclined to ride the bus. Not good for SPRINTs model in which riders would each pay a subscription, but hey, that's business

  92. LOADLIN is your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Is there a program I can run from DOS/Windows to start a Linux install if I have the CD images in a FAT directory, or in their own partition on the hard drive?"

    This is one of the options for installing Debian, and in fact is how I did my first ever Linux install (of Potato). Basically, I had to make a directory and copy a half-dozen or so files into it, then exit Windows using "Restart in MS-DOS mode", navigate to the correct directory when the machine restarts, then type loadlin followed by the name of the kernel image file. It then started a Debian base install, and after configuring the network, I grabbed the rest of the installation from a Debian mirror. (I did this instead of booting from floppies because I didn't have any floppies lying around).

    The above process did *not* work with the bf2.4 kernel for Woody when I tried it on another machine, and I remember reading that a bug in loadlin would not allow it to load certain kernels (no idea if it has been fixed by now). There is a new Debian installer being prepared for Sarge - no idea if there is some way to run it off a FAT partition.

    Also, newer versions of Windows do not allow you to boot in DOS mode.

    Finally, if you have some way of getting all of the files from a bootable installation CD onto a hard drive partition, you could set up the boot order to get it to boot from there. I'm not sure how you could do this within Windows.

  93. Usually, no. by Slashamatic · · Score: 1
    With so0me older GSM phones, some of the modem work had to be done by the PC, but not anymore. The ones with mini-USB connectors talk proper USB and declare themselves as modems with AT commands. The commands are usually documented in the configuration manual on the respective phone's developer site. This is certainly true for Sony-Ericsson and Nokia.

    The things is that a GSM modem isn't like a WinModem. It provides the ability to use the phone's link as a data layer. This being quite demanding, also from the regulatory viewpoint, the modem tends to sit in the phone rather than the PC.

    What you do get on the PC is some optimisation software sometimes and also stuff to make raising the link somewhat easier.

  94. ATTWS/Cingular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an employee of at&t wireless/cingular I regret to say that at this time through all of my searching we are not supporting linux, however I do know from past experiences that if enough people call in looking for linux support(as I'm sure many slashdotters will)things will change for the better

  95. Great quote :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    All in all, setting up a wireless connection is easy once you have the cables.

    LOL!

  96. Verizon & v710 & Zaurus (w/ bluetooth) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty happy with my Motorola v710's crippled bluetooth, because I can still hop on the internet via my Zaurus (linux-based PDA) and just pay minutes. Pinging slashdot averages about 512ms, and DSLReports shows the connection to be slightly faster than 56k. It's not as good as a WiFi hotspot, but it definitely lets me check email and ssh into any servers causing trouble.

  97. Works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Transmeta based subnotebook (Sony Picturebook C1MV) running Ubuntu!
    Works just fine for me using a usb bluetooth adapter and my Nokia 3650 on T-Mobile's network.

    I'd like to reiterate what someone earlier said, just because its not supported doesn't mean it doesn't work. I had the same setup on AT&T before I switched to T-Mobile (you can't beat +$19/mo for unlimited usage.)

    Do your homework, often google found me support forum entries on the provider's homepage that had all the settings I needed.

  98. Ricochet by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    Ten years ago this was a piece o' cake with Metricom's Ricochet service. They're gone and nothing better has come along. But hey, that's progress.(?)

  99. Re:Choose Verizon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was saying that they weren't union and as such should not be used if that is your criteria.....

    >
    Choose Verizon because they're Non-Union? I can agree with choosing Verizon if they're not outsourcing jobs overseas, but because they're Non-Union, um, get a clue.

  100. Using Sprint by scubacuda · · Score: 1
    Someone in LUG just suggested this Sprint solution for his Linux box. He says it works rather well.

  101. Nextel is godawful. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    I have an iDEN internet connection via work and it is terribly, horribly slow at 19.2kbps max.

    FYI.

    --

    +++ATH0