Slashdot Mirror
Doom 3 Now Supports Surround Sound
nukem996 writes "DOOM 3 v1.1.1286 for Linux has just been released. ALSA has finally been implemented so Linux gamers can finally play Doom 3 with surround sound! Along with surround sound support this release fixes a number of bugs. You can read Timo's release notes here. As usual the release is up on the idsoftware ftp server and there is a torrent."
"Some say it is repetitive and plotless... "
eh it's Doom for gods sake. I really dunno wtf people were expecting, some kind of blockbuster don corleone story that would win more oscars than ben hur. It's friggin DOOM!! the game where you pump soldiers on crack and ugly motherfuckers straight outta compton HELL, full of lead. It's not Final Fantasy, it's not Deus Ex. It's like the gaming version of all Arnold Schwarzenegger movies ever made. We all know we don't watch his movies for his deep insight heart wrenching masterpieces. We like gore and violence!! that's what DOOM IS!!! GORE AND VIOLENCE!!!!! so enough with the fucking whining and moaning about how it had a bad story and was repetitive. You want a fucking story, go watch bridges of madison county.
I think we'll see a Linux port of Half-Life long before World of Warcraft...
"Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
I didn't want surround sound. I wanted the gamma to be increased so I could actually see things instead of shooting at siloeuettes.
Maybe this is all still part of the 'atmosphere' scam that they put us through. No thanks iD, I preferred Doom 2. Faster, funnier, and better to play. If I'd wanted to shoot at blacker areas of dark screen, I'd have turned down the brightness on my monitor. Dark areas aren't scary. They're just annoying.
May the Maths Be with you!
is there a changelog anywhere?
> Is it worth the £30-sthg? Some say it is repetitive and plotless...
I'd say the same about most popular pornography, yet people still buy it anyway.
Why didn't Doom 3 for Linux ship with this? Why does about every game I have bought in the past two years on Windows support surround sound just fine?
Allow me to rewrite your question from an opposite perspective:
Why did id choose to write its sound code using an API that hasn't been actively developed by the community in years, and from which everyone is moving away? Why didn't they write code that works with what people are actually using?
People are working on sound for Linux. It's called ALSA. It's what pretty much everyone using a 2.6 kernel will be using. It does desktop audio. It does professional audio. [1] It emulates OSS for legacy compatibility, but if you want to actually take advantage of its features, you need to actually use it.
So, yes, why didn't Doom 3 on Linux ship with this? Because id didn't put in the extra effort, and because they wanted to support the old API for some reason. This isn't the fault of 'the community.' The API is already out there. ALSA didn't just suddenly gain support for surround sound. It's had it. The fact here is that id is just now including support for the current Linux sound architecture.
Would you blame Microsoft if Halflife 2 only used features from DirectX 6 at first, and then in a later patch they updated it to use DirectX 9?
[1] ALSA doesn't work too well on some cards unfortunately. The reason for this is that some companies refuse to release specifications in order for drivers to be written. This means that the developers (only a few people) have to reverse engineer the cards to write drivers. This is hardly the fault of 'the community' either, and really, they've done a remarkable job on some of them, considering what they've had to work with.
I've come for the woman, and your head.
I just installed the new Linux version of Doom 3 over the first release and got to hear surround right away (after setting surround in the menu). One thing that bothers me - and this is occurs in the Windows version too - is that the rear surround channels are too quiet. There needs to be some sort of rear channel adjustment in the game if simply hardcoding the volume up conflicts with other people's configurations in which the volume is just fine.
No other game that uses surround has this problem. The UT2004 demo used to have a quiet sound problem on all channels on both Windows and Linux, but that got solved rather quickly.
I guess I should mention I have an SBLive! Value (4-channel version of the EMU10K1), but it shouldn't matter much, considering it has a pretty large user base.
It would be cool if it didn't suck.