Slashdot Mirror


ROTK:EE Trailer Released

artemis67 writes "A six-minute trailer for The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, Extended Edition, has been released, and it's quite good. We get to see some snippets of the final confrontation between Gandalf and Saruman, as well as some other intriguing scenes that will add a lot of depth to the final movie. The Extended Edition will add an additional 50 minutes to the film, bring the total for the Extended trilogy to 11 hours and 20 minutes."

10 of 454 comments (clear)

  1. Direct link to the hi-res quicktime video by theefer · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    theefer
    1. Re:Direct link to the hi-res quicktime video by Ubergrendle · · Score: 5, Funny

      For my 30th birthday, I am going to indulge myself in couch-potato madness and watch all 3 trilogies in sequence. 11hr and 20 min is a significant investment of time, but I think it can be done.

      7am: friends arrive, pancake breakfast.
      8am: Fellowship of the Ring (~4+ hrs)
      12:30pm: Lunch
      2:00pm: The Two Towers (~3 1/2 hrs)
      5:30pm: Dinner
      7:00pm: Return of the King (~ 4 1/2 hrs)
      11:30pm: Eyes ooze out of our sockets, bedsores open on our asses.

      Our first baby is on the way, so I know I'll never get to do something this irresponsible and useless again. :)

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    2. Re:Direct link to the hi-res quicktime video by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 5, Funny

      Our first baby is on the way,

      Are you sure it's yours ? I mean, look at what you do with your time :)

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  2. Extended Versions by KrancHammer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To preempt the whining that accompanied every article about previous Lord of the Rings extended version DVD releases: I know some complain that studios release special, super-duper extended versions in a scheme to make more money from people willing to buy multiple versions of a movie. I really don't think that this is the case for the extended version of Return of the King. Its not as if they didn't tell us a extended version was on its way. The wait between the DVD release of the theatrical version an this release is a bit annoying, but I believe it is worth holding off purchasing for. And that's the key phrase... nobody makes you buy every single version of a movie that comes out. if you want the regular version, buy that. If not, wait for the extended movie.

    --
    Trolls: The high-tech version of those morons that scrawl obscenities in public bathrooms.
  3. Re:what I want to know by PhuCknuT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Would you buy a ticket if it cost twice what they do now? Showing a 4 hour movie for the same price as a 1.5 hour movie means you can only show it like 1/3 as many times in a day, and therefore not make much money on it. That's the reason there are 'theatrical' and 'extended' editions of LOTR in the first place. It wasn't to make twice as much selling DVDs, it was because theaters don't like long ass movies.

  4. Re:Sharkey and the Shire? by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 5, Informative
    "Does anyone know if the EE covers all the stuff with "Mr Sharkey" (have I remembered correctly?) and the Shire? Did they even film that stuff?"

    They did not film any of the Scouring of the Shire, so no, you won't find that in the EE. I'm not saying I agree with their decision, as I found that chapter in the book to be the perfect way to show the changes in the Shire during their absence, and how evil crept in even there. But I am sympathetic to the idea that movies are not the same thing as books, and I at least understand their motive in not creating another conflict after the big resolution earlier. I know I personally got tired of all those "7 endings" wisecracks. I can only imagine the complaints from people if the Scouring of the Shire were in the movie after what they thought was the ending.

    But for all you purists out there, I can tell you one thing with certainty: That chapter is right where it always was, in the book.

  5. Re:EE by Per+Abich · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, but as Return of the King: Enterprise Edition ;-)

  6. Re:Already ordered it! by static0verdrive · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nope. (Actually it's Minas Tirith, not Thirit...) Saruman lived at Orthanc, the tower at Isengard. Check out this list of towers for a better understanding.

    --
    ========
    77 77 77 2e 6d 65 6c 76 69 6e 73 2e 63 6f 6d
  7. Jackson has totally changed everything again! by sgant · · Score: 5, Funny

    Added scene showing Sauron (digitally placed in over an actor), talking to Denethor inside the olephant hanger.

    Changed the title to "Revenge of the King"

    Totally changes the concept of The Ring. In this changed version they explain that everyone has Rings inside of them, yet Frodo is a special case because he has extra Rings inside making him the most powerful Ring Bearer ever.

    Now Sauroman shoots first!

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
  8. Re:Sharkey and the Shire? by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 5, Funny
    I think I'll write a version of Lord of the Rings told entirely from the point-of-view of Tom Bombadil:

    The Fellowship of the Ring: Bombadil Style -- Tom wanders around the forest singing, and briefly visits with some hobbits carrying a trinket of little interest.

    The Two Towers: Neither of Which Bombadil Lives In -- Goldberry makes tasty treats while Tom cleans his boots.

    The Return of the King: Someone Bombadil Thinks he Knows -- Tom and Old Man Willow discuss philosophy and sing songs. Some strange doings down south make the sky turn dark, but then it's all light again, and that calls for some drink! The end.