Slashdot Mirror


ROTK:EE Trailer Released

artemis67 writes "A six-minute trailer for The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, Extended Edition, has been released, and it's quite good. We get to see some snippets of the final confrontation between Gandalf and Saruman, as well as some other intriguing scenes that will add a lot of depth to the final movie. The Extended Edition will add an additional 50 minutes to the film, bring the total for the Extended trilogy to 11 hours and 20 minutes."

39 of 454 comments (clear)

  1. Direct link to the hi-res quicktime video by theefer · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    theefer
    1. Re:Direct link to the hi-res quicktime video by Ubergrendle · · Score: 5, Funny

      For my 30th birthday, I am going to indulge myself in couch-potato madness and watch all 3 trilogies in sequence. 11hr and 20 min is a significant investment of time, but I think it can be done.

      7am: friends arrive, pancake breakfast.
      8am: Fellowship of the Ring (~4+ hrs)
      12:30pm: Lunch
      2:00pm: The Two Towers (~3 1/2 hrs)
      5:30pm: Dinner
      7:00pm: Return of the King (~ 4 1/2 hrs)
      11:30pm: Eyes ooze out of our sockets, bedsores open on our asses.

      Our first baby is on the way, so I know I'll never get to do something this irresponsible and useless again. :)

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    2. Re:Direct link to the hi-res quicktime video by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 5, Funny

      Our first baby is on the way,

      Are you sure it's yours ? I mean, look at what you do with your time :)

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    3. Re:Direct link to the hi-res quicktime video by 3terrabyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You should have it over by 8 pm. What you need to do is not take 1.5 hour breaks, and just order pizzas or something and spill pepporoni on the couch while eating & watching.

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    4. Re:Direct link to the hi-res quicktime video by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you were a true Godfather fan you would not speak of a "Godfather trilogy". Just forget the third one.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    5. Re:Direct link to the hi-res quicktime video by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's not quite insightful, as much as it it "Your Mileage May Vary". For myself, taking long breaks would be necessary if I was to endure watching anything for > 3 hours. Plus, I'd suggest eating something a little more healthy than pizza, as if you'd be amongst a group of friends for 11 hours, the gas would potentially be horrible :)

  2. Re:Already ordered it! by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 4, Funny

    In Korea, only old people have seen all three extended editions. Seriously, it takes that long.

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  3. Only 11h??? by Cyberax · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please, wake me up when a New Super Extended Platinum 24h long Edition will be available.

  4. 11 hours 20 minutes ... by YetAnotherName · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yikes ... that's a lot of pizza.

  5. what I want to know by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is noew line and the theatres not tapping the opportunity to make gobs of cash?

    special event all 3 extended films in the theatre would sell out for 2 weeks solid. It's guarenteeing that every seat in that theatre will buy 3 movie tickets, they will eat gobs of popcorn, and the delay between film changes will be welcomed for bathroom and smoke breaks.

    it is a fricking gold mine waiting to be tapped, hell, starwars fanatics pale in comparison to LOTR fanatics... they couldn't sell out the trilogy running back to back here but the single night they ran the LOTR movies they oversold it.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:what I want to know by PhuCknuT · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Would you buy a ticket if it cost twice what they do now? Showing a 4 hour movie for the same price as a 1.5 hour movie means you can only show it like 1/3 as many times in a day, and therefore not make much money on it. That's the reason there are 'theatrical' and 'extended' editions of LOTR in the first place. It wasn't to make twice as much selling DVDs, it was because theaters don't like long ass movies.

  6. Words don't come easy... by d95adam · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...between Gandalf and Sauroman

    Dubya, is that you posting here on Slashdot? :)

  7. Re:Realtime by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    12 hours is about the amount of time to read the original 6 books (in 3 well-known volumes)
    Ah.. speedreader are we?

  8. Extended Versions by KrancHammer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To preempt the whining that accompanied every article about previous Lord of the Rings extended version DVD releases: I know some complain that studios release special, super-duper extended versions in a scheme to make more money from people willing to buy multiple versions of a movie. I really don't think that this is the case for the extended version of Return of the King. Its not as if they didn't tell us a extended version was on its way. The wait between the DVD release of the theatrical version an this release is a bit annoying, but I believe it is worth holding off purchasing for. And that's the key phrase... nobody makes you buy every single version of a movie that comes out. if you want the regular version, buy that. If not, wait for the extended movie.

    --
    Trolls: The high-tech version of those morons that scrawl obscenities in public bathrooms.
    1. Re:Extended Versions by Gudlyf · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Although, I believe I read an interview with Peter Jackson somewhere where he says that even these extended releases don't have everything he'd like in them, and that when they release the full extended edition boxed set, he suspects there will be even more footage.

      If that is true, then people will be really pissed off.

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
  9. Re:Realtime by Sinus0idal · · Score: 4, Funny

    In Korea, old people read faster than YOU!

  10. Re:Realtime by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its around 1200 pages, right? (I can't remember for sure off the top of my head). Well, that'd mean around 100 pages per hour. I read 1-3 pages per minute, depending on the content, so thats somewhat reasonable. Of course, it'd be exhausting.

    --
    "Stumble before you crawl"
  11. Sharkey and the Shire? by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does anyone know if the EE covers all the stuff with "Mr Sharkey" (have I remembered correctly?) and the Shire? Did they even film that stuff?

    1. Re:Sharkey and the Shire? by yack0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All stories have said that "The Scouring of the Shire" has not been included in the movie, at all.

      However, I'm hoping an early christmas present will be that Mr. Jackson left the vision of that event in the Mirror of Galadriel scene for a reason.

      I can hope, but won't hope too much.

      --
      -- There is no sig line, only Zuul.
    2. Re:Sharkey and the Shire? by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 5, Informative
      "Does anyone know if the EE covers all the stuff with "Mr Sharkey" (have I remembered correctly?) and the Shire? Did they even film that stuff?"

      They did not film any of the Scouring of the Shire, so no, you won't find that in the EE. I'm not saying I agree with their decision, as I found that chapter in the book to be the perfect way to show the changes in the Shire during their absence, and how evil crept in even there. But I am sympathetic to the idea that movies are not the same thing as books, and I at least understand their motive in not creating another conflict after the big resolution earlier. I know I personally got tired of all those "7 endings" wisecracks. I can only imagine the complaints from people if the Scouring of the Shire were in the movie after what they thought was the ending.

      But for all you purists out there, I can tell you one thing with certainty: That chapter is right where it always was, in the book.

    3. Re:Sharkey and the Shire? by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 5, Funny
      I think I'll write a version of Lord of the Rings told entirely from the point-of-view of Tom Bombadil:

      The Fellowship of the Ring: Bombadil Style -- Tom wanders around the forest singing, and briefly visits with some hobbits carrying a trinket of little interest.

      The Two Towers: Neither of Which Bombadil Lives In -- Goldberry makes tasty treats while Tom cleans his boots.

      The Return of the King: Someone Bombadil Thinks he Knows -- Tom and Old Man Willow discuss philosophy and sing songs. Some strange doings down south make the sky turn dark, but then it's all light again, and that calls for some drink! The end.

    4. Re:Sharkey and the Shire? by C0deM0nkey · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Bravo!

      I will probably be flamed into oblivion for saying this but I've never understood why some fans get so wound up over Tom Bombadil. I am currently more than half way through the 12-volume History of Middle-Earth (HOME) (I've completed volumes 1-4, 6, 7 and am more than half-way through volume 5. Volumes 6-8 deal with Lord of the Rings) and Bombadil did not factor into any of Tolkien's pre-LOTR Middle-Earth writings. Yes, there were a few poems and such that were written but these were outside the mythology and early history of Middle-Earth.

      Tom Bombadil always struck me as little-more than a deus ex machina and I've never particularly cared for him.

      From what I have read, Tolkien struggled to find a story to write (he was under pressure from his publisher to produce a Hobbit sequel) and did not have a strong grasp of what the tale would be until Elrond's Council (which, I believe, explains why the story got very focused after that point). The material prior to the Council, in my opinion, reflects this struggle to find a story. Do not mistake me, the Old Forest and the Barrow-Wights were cool [book] scenes that did turn out to serve a purpose later but, as Jackson has demonstrated, they could easily be written out (e.g. replace Barrow-Wight (Numenorean/Dunedain?) blades with Noldoli daggers given by Galadriel, remove Old Forest and explain that trees could be more than just silent stalks of wood in Fangorn, etc.)

      If you are an aspiring fantasy author, like critical analysis or constructed languages or if you would simply enjoy reading about the evolution of Middle-Earth, I would highly recommend the HOME books. They are not for the non-Middle-Earth geek; I've tried getting other people to read them and so far I've failed - I think you really have to have an interest in Middle-Earth (as a literary creation) in order to tolerate reading and re-reading the same stories over and over as they are emended from draft to draft. I've read and re-read versions of the Silmarillion (the Quenta, the Silmarillion, the Quenta-Silmarillion, *must...keep...sanity*) so many times with so many minor changes that it is difficult, at times, to keep the canon straight from the evolving story.

  12. Re:Already ordered it! by artemis67 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ask and ye shall receive.

    Looks like it's coming out December 14th, same day that ROTK:EE ships.

  13. With 20 extra minutes of carrying Frodo by suso · · Score: 4, Funny

    See them carry Frodo in ways you didn't see in the theater.

  14. Not the first and won't be the last to say this... by Malfourmed · · Score: 4, Funny

    LOTR: ROTK Extended Edition: Now with even more endings!

  15. Re:EE by Per+Abich · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, but as Return of the King: Enterprise Edition ;-)

  16. Re:Already ordered it! by static0verdrive · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nope. (Actually it's Minas Tirith, not Thirit...) Saruman lived at Orthanc, the tower at Isengard. Check out this list of towers for a better understanding.

    --
    ========
    77 77 77 2e 6d 65 6c 76 69 6e 73 2e 63 6f 6d
  17. Jackson has totally changed everything again! by sgant · · Score: 5, Funny

    Added scene showing Sauron (digitally placed in over an actor), talking to Denethor inside the olephant hanger.

    Changed the title to "Revenge of the King"

    Totally changes the concept of The Ring. In this changed version they explain that everyone has Rings inside of them, yet Frodo is a special case because he has extra Rings inside making him the most powerful Ring Bearer ever.

    Now Sauroman shoots first!

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
  18. Re:Gandalf -v- Saruman??? by Ubergrendle · · Score: 3, Informative

    The scouring of the shrie is NOT in the EE due to dramatic pacing for the big screen (according to Jackson) ~and~ considerations regarding length.

    SPOILER

    Until I see the movie I can't say for sure, but likely Wormtongue will still be the one to kill off Saurman. And instead of the Hobbit milita shooting down Wormtongue, it will probably be numerous unnamed Rohan horseriders(sp).

    --
    John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
  19. Re:Not the first and won't be the last to say this by gameboyhippo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Exactly! I went through an emotional roller coaster in the theater. "Ah! That was a great movie! ... No wait! There's more! Hey that was pretty good ... Huh!? There's more! Is this the end? Guess not... Hmmm... " And it went on like that for the last 7 hours of the movie. I was conflicted between wanting to learn more and wanting to relive myself at the restroom.

  20. Re:Already ordered it! by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 4, Funny

    Check out this list of towers for a better understanding.

    Rubbish list. Doesn't mention any Fawlty Towers whatsoever... :-P

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  21. Re:I dunno.... by 10Ghz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, the extra scenes in the previous EE's were mostly NOT battle-scenes (were there ANY new battle-scenes in 'em?). So I have to ask: what the hell are you blathering about? Have you even seen the past EE's?

    Looking at "Fellowship of the Ring", I can remember these new scenes (found in the usenet):

    *A new addition to the opening sequence in which Bilbo provides background on Hobbits and their history in voice-over as he writes his memoirs.

    *A new introduction to Samwise Gamgee, seen in his capacity as a gardener.

    *A scene taking place at the Green Dragon Inn, which introduces us to the camaraderie of the Hobbits (we see them singing together) and sets up the geopolitics of the story.

    *The Hobbits witnessing the departure of the Elves from Middle Earth on the way to Bree.

    *Aragorn watching over the sleeping Hobbits, singing the ballad of Beren and Luthien to himself in the night.

    *Aragorn at his mother's grave, in which we learn that he was raised by Elves and that Sauron has long hunted him.

    *Two new moments during the departure from Rivendale, one in which we see Arwen's emotional reaction to Aragorn's leaving, and another in which Elrond sees the Fellowship off.

    *A scene with the Fellowship in the mines of Moria, in which we learn how the Dwarves themselves unleashed the fire-demon that eventually destroyed them.

    *A scene at Lothlorien, where Galadriel bestows upon each of the Fellowship a gift which will play an important role later in the Trilogy.

    *And finally, more footage of the battle at Amon Hen. This is not particularly bloody footage, but its addition will likely result in this cut
    of the film receiving an R-rating.

    Oh yes, that's LOTS of "new battle-scenes"! NOT!

    Two Towers is similar. Very little battle-scenes, but lots of background material.

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  22. What? by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 4, Funny


    I can hear a thousand wives screaming out in agony....

    "Get to the mountain you little bastards! ARrrgh! You picked this? Alright, I get THREE picks for this one!"

  23. RoTK with the good bits restored (finally!) by mihalis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just don't understand how Peter Jackson thought the following were optional :-

    • Gandalf/Saruman rematch at Orthanc
    • Aragorn reveals himself in Palantir of Orthanc
    • Gandalf confronts Witch-King at Minas Tirith
    • Voice of Sauron at the Black Gate

    Luckily they are ALL in the EE! I can't wait

    1. Re:RoTK with the good bits restored (finally!) by mihalis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here's how these good bits could have made it into RoTK cinematic release easily :

      Put Shelob back into the Two Towers where she belongs. By the end of that book, Sam is lying senseless outside the orc stronghold and Frodo has been taken by the enemy. That would have been a fine ending for the film.

      Find the time for this, in turn, by drastically shortening the Helms Deep stuff. It's dull.

      You can dump the Aragorn falls off a cliff guff too.

      See, easy-peasy!

      Disclaimer : IHNDMOEHM (I have not directed my own 11 hour movie)

  24. Re:BLADOW! by harrkev · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is why I don't buy movies anymore. They always release something 'bigger and better' than the one before just to make bigger bucks... Pretty pathetic I think!

    I feel the same way about science. I thought that Newton was great, and then this Einstein guy came along. Out goes Newton. Then, this whole "quantum" thing came along. Now everybody is talking about "strings" but even if you use dental floss, those strings are still not small enough to make up all matter. For that matter, even thread is too big. If a string is made of atoms, and atoms are made of strings, where does it stop. I have gone back to Newton as the ultimate authority, and I am sticking with Newton until the final theory of everything comes out.

    OK. The above post is meant to be humorous. But there is a point. If you like a movie, then buy it. If you suspect that a better version MIGHT come along, then wait. Most movies are only released once. It seems like only the mega-blockbusters come out in more than one version (Terminator, Star Wars, LOTR, etc.) Have you seen an extended director's cut of Pee-Wee's Big Adventure. So buy movies, and have fun!
    --
    "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  25. This would be the second. by rdunnell · · Score: 4, Informative

    The original theatrical version was released (3 parts) and this is the third part of the director's cut.

    Not really milking... they announced up front that they would have both editions, so people would know whether they wanted the original or wanted to wait for the extended.

  26. Enterprise Edition by ry4an · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just read that a Return of the King: Enterprise Edition. I've been doing this software thing for way too long.

  27. You call yourself a couch potato? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not very hobbit-ish of you. The proper sequence is:

    First breakfast
    FOTR disk 1
    Second breakfast
    FOTR disk 2
    Elevenses
    TT 1
    Luncheon
    TT 2
    Afternoon tea
    ROTK 1
    Supper
    ROTK 2
    Stomach pumping.