Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Sues Spammers

mclearn writes "Microsoft has filed seven more lawsuits against spammers, this time targeting those who violate the 'brown-paper wrapper' provision of the CAN-SPAM law, which sets rules for sexually oriented e-mail solicitations. Apparently these are a small part of over 120 spam-related cases Microsoft is currently litigating. With Microsoft's deep pockets, can they effectively send a resounding message to spammers?"

34 of 304 comments (clear)

  1. How Microsoft can end Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    By getting into the spam business themselves!

    Now, hear me out. Microsoft can become the exclusive spammer of Hotmail, and then they can strong arm other ISPs and mail providers into only accepting Microsoft(tm) Spam. Once this is done, they can quickly buy up the other spammers that haven't gone under. Finally, once this is accomplished and they're the only spammer left, they can quietly shut down the operation. Tada, spam is over.

    1. Re:How Microsoft can end Spam by Daverd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Finally, once this is accomplished and they're the only spammer left, they can quietly shut down the operation.

      That will never happen. Open source spam will start up the competition again.

    2. Re:How Microsoft can end Spam by pHatidic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Evil cyborg Bill takes off a shoe and starts banging it on the podium, "I WILL BURY YOU!"

  2. Message? by CRC'99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With Microsoft's deep pockets, can they effectively send a resounding message to spammers?

    Yeah... Don't spam XXX material... just the regular garbage... Anyone who thinks this is going to make much difference, is either nieve or stupid - possibly both.

    --
    Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
  3. Amazed! by ReeprFlame · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one am flabergasted. Amazed.Yet confused... There is no way to describe it. Or am I dreaming? [too much coffee?] Is Microsoft actually trying to HELP the standard Internet user? hmmm... thats a new one for sure!

    1. Re:Amazed! by ImTheDarkcyde · · Score: 4, Funny

      next thing you know they'll probably reccomend fire fox!

    2. Re:Amazed! by MP3Chuck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well of course ... they run one of the biggest email operations out there so it'd be in their best interest to eliminate spam, since it only hurts them. It's no surprise, really.

  4. Makes Me Wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Out of curiosity, why is Microsoft bothering to litigate?

    Surely, the amount of money they spend doing this outweighs the "brownie points" they'll be winning.

    And, why wouldn't they just focus on writing anti-spam filtering software, and then _sell_ it as a solution to the spam problem? (In that light, shouldn't they be _encouraging_ more spammers so that they can sell more anti-spam software, or perhaps better convince people to switch to an "enhanced" Outlook 200x?)

    1. Re:Makes Me Wonder by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Probably a direct order from He Who Is Most Spammed, Mr. Bill G.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    2. Re:Makes Me Wonder by thogard · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Out of curiosity, why is Microsoft bothering to litigate?

      One reason is that if they don't stop the spam from zombie windows boxes, they can get sued by others for engineering negligence combined with innocent third party issues. At this point they have no option but to show they are doing their best to go after the spamers and deal with a technical solution or else they are going to end up on the wrong end of a class action suit.

      The case to sue MS for the spam issue is getting stronger every day and one of these days they are going to wish they had done something sooner.

      Once the spam zombies are gone, the stupid hosters will be a much easier problem.

  5. Re:FP? by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have to say despite all the M$ hatred we all feel for their many security flaws and and horrible software for once I think Microsoft may be acting in the best intrests of the community, with basically no direct benefit to them. Even if it doesn't kill spam (which I don't think anything has the possibility of doing) it might shut down a few or few hundred spammers, and that is a start. I have to say for once I have some nice feelings toward the evil monopoly.

  6. Small dent in Hotmail Viagra Sales... by rzebram · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of course, no matter how much they spend, we'll probably always be seeing viagra spam in our hotmail boxes. Perhaps in addition to this set of lawsuits (which benefit everybody, don't get me wrong), they should throw in a campaign to work on giving the Hotmail spam filters an overhaul. It might help the community a great deal if Microsoft were to push some of their development over to spam filtering, as well as integrating some of the better email authentication systems into Hotmail, Outlook and the like.

    Are there any published studies about how much spam could be reduced if Microsoft could place more effective anti-spam features into the OS itself

    Don't get me wrong, I think this is a great step forward, but I think (supposing spammers aren't a little more intimidated) that we might see a better reduction in spam if better precautions were to be taken. Sorry if I've missed any big features mixed in with Windows that might help with this, I don't pay much attention to the patching that goes in as far as email is concerned.

    Ryan

    1. Re:Small dent in Hotmail Viagra Sales... by Suburbanpride · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Are there any published studies about how much spam could be reduced if Microsoft could place more effective anti-spam features into the OS itself

      I certainly wouldn't want spam features built into the OS. Isn't the reason why we all hate microsoft that they put too much stuff into their os?

      Thunderbird does an ok job of filtering spam for me, although I'm very careful about where my email adress goes.

      the biggest thing that could help stop spam is if no one bought anything. sapm costs basicly nothing to send, so if 1 person out of a billion buys viagra or whatever, the spamer makes a profit.

      --
      sorry 'bout the mess...
  7. I don't believe it! by TR0GD0RtheBURNiNAT0R · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...I'm actually rooting for MS!

    let's see... Red Sox won World Series as well.

    Well, the apocalypse is on it's way... better start repenting and whatnot.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  8. Hooray! Go Microsoft! by BugBlatterBeast · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...this feels strange...

    --
    If you steal this sig, the only people who will profit are professional criminals.
  9. I bet I know why.. by Mechcommander · · Score: 4, Funny

    I recently read that Bill Gates has the most spammed e-mail address in the world. Microsoft is simply following a game-plan to sue all the spammers that aggravate Mr. Gates.

    1. Re:I bet I know why.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      *Bill Gates opens up his Hotmail account*

      "Do I want mail-order brides from Russia? Why... why yes... I do. I'm sure Stevey B wouldn't mind one as well under the tree on Christmas morning!"

      *clicks to order, moves onto next message*

      "What... What? Is this one implying I need pills to compensate for my small penis? Do you really think, doug35651@aol.com, that I would be ordering mail order brides if I couldn't pleasure them? I don't need pills to compensate -- my deep pockets and my corporate empire keep me secure enough! Doug, you shall rue the day you trifled with Mister Gates!"

      *buzzes intercom, calls legal team, sets plan in motion* ... please feel free to continue this story :)

  10. I don't know who to root for! by GFLPraxis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know who to root for! I don't want Microsoft to win money from spammers, but I want to spammers to burn and die (and go broke in the process). Who should I root for? I'm so confused...

    1. Re:I don't know who to root for! by general_re · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I don't want Microsoft to win money from spammers, but I want to spammers to burn and die (and go broke in the process). Who should I root for?

      Microsoft has such an ungodly amount of money already that you might as well root for them, since nothing they win is likely to have much of a material impact on who they are or what they do. MS winning a million dollars in court is like you finding a $10 bill on the sidewalk - it might perk up your morning a bit, but it's not going to change your life. Spammers paying out millions, though - that'll wreck your whole day if you're in the spam business...

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    2. Re:I don't know who to root for! by djward · · Score: 4, Funny
      like you finding a $10 bill on the sidewalk - it might perk up your morning a bit, but it's not going to change your life.
      You obviously aren't a grad student.
  11. The spammers will just move overseas by DemonCat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As we pass laws in the US against spam, and start enforcing them, all it will ultimately do is drive the spamming operations out of the country. There will always be some small poor nation willing to let these paracites stay as long as they generate some tax revenue and keep a few locals employed. Blocking international email traffic isn't a viable option, so there is little we will be able to do about it.

    Given that, I have moral objections to spammers and am pleased each time I hear of one getting what he or she deserves.

    1. Re:The spammers will just move overseas by Indy1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      let the spammers flee to south america, asia, etc. Unless you need mail from such and such a country, firewall the HELL out of it. Koreans are already learning the hard way what it means to be so heavily blocked that no one accepts their mail traffic.

      --
      Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
    2. Re:The spammers will just move overseas by Frater+219 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Let them move. Let them live in paranoid armed compounds in "small poor nations" and fear that the locals will dig up their phone lines for the copper. Let them hide in places where the corrupt telecoms monopoly has run Internet access so badly that their IP addresses are already widely blocked for spam and abuse. Let them eventually get lined up by a tin-pot dictator and executed at dawn by firing squad, since they want to live beyond the rule of law. (After all, we can always block 'em -- I understand getting an email out of Nigeria is pretty tricky these days.)

      Currently, the bulk of the big spammers live and operate within the United States. They may host their Web sites in China, buy lists of open proxies from Romania, and commission viruses from Russian Mafia programmers -- but they live in the "comfort" of the U.S. whose laws they flout.

      They do not want to move overseas. They want the comforts of home -- to make millions without leaving the couch. They are small-minded, hurtful, nasty little people. They want the world delivered to their door, and are willing to steal and destroy to get it -- but only if they can do that stealing and destroying from behind a screen. They are not brave. When they are challenged, they retreat into paranoia and lash out with lawsuits based on conspiracy theories. Can't do that from East Bumfuckistan.

  12. But what about the harmful stuff? by Ticklemonster · · Score: 5, Interesting
    My 10 year old son apparently registered at a gaming site that sells email addresses, because for a long time, he was getting pron emails. This has finally stopped, so I think either they gave up, or perhaps Moft is doing some good.

    But what I wonder, is why isn't Moft going after the spyware and all that put stuff on your machine that, if you remove it, it makes your machine act funky? Isn't that damaging their product, IE?, or sometimes even Windblows itself is messed up.

    Spam is a nuisance, but the adware and spyware are, imho, what are the biggest threat to people's computers. Of course, far be it from me to complain, because I make a liiiiittle on the side cleaning up machines over and over and over a freaking gain, but really, I think Moft should go out and start nailing some of these folks hard.

    (btw, Moft means Microsoft)

    That's my two cents, I expect no one to pay any attention to it, lol.

    --
    Karma: Bad is the liberal way of saying this guy won't drink the kool aid here on slash dot. I wear my Karma with pride
  13. Well it won't be the deth bell or anything by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But it will help. All technology, lawsuits, and prosecution helps slow the increase (hopefully to the point of making it negative) of spam. Technology and lawsuits both make spam a less profitable proposition. The less spam that gets through, the less sales you make. The more spammers that get sued and lose their ass, the less likely the average spammer is to come out ahead. The more spammers get locked up, the more scary a proposition it is to new ones.

    It's all about making it less attractive. It will always be attractive to some, even if thepbenalty is death by anal probe. However the numbers CAN be reduced by things like this.

    Up till receantly, all it took to be a spammer was a total lack of ethics. There was basically no risk. You wouldn't get sued, and there was no law against it. Combine that with the returns, you had a lot of people lining up.

    Well now there IS a risk. You can get your sued to the point of losing everything, and locked up in jail for a good long time. Also the returns will continue to get worse as more and more gets blocked.

    We can never expcet to get rid of spam completely, but with effort we can curtail it. It's not like drugs where people demand it, actively seek it out, and will pay massive amount of money for it. Most people, even those that buy from it, don't want to get it. Thus all you really need to do is make it unattractive to people and most of it will die off.

  14. Everyone come down a little bit... by apiccirilli · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For all the Microsoft naysayers out there, could we pause one little moment here? Before we trash everything Microsoft does as being downright evil with secret motives, it might be nice to consider that perhaps Microsoft IS doing something decent. After all, Bill Gates is undeniably a good guy when it comes to charity (I hope most people would be without that kind of money, but he does do a LOT of stuff with it). And he has been known to do a good amount of anti-spam work with Congress. Could it be possible that their 120 suits against spammers are actually at least slightly altruistic in purpose?

    I'm not saying not to hold a little suspicion - they are Microsoft, but then again, don't discount them just because they are Microsoft. Instead of trying to make better anti-spam software (which they are also doing), they are throwing a lot of money at the root of the cause, both in Congressional lobbying and these suits. Doesn't seem too bad to me.

    Aaron

  15. Re:FP? by MEGAMAID · · Score: 4, Insightful

    basically no direct benefit to them

    Are you kidding? I'm sure there is a huge benefit to them in the cost of running Hotmail. Hotmail accounts would be send millions of spam a day.

    --

    Waking Up - There must be a better way to start the day.
  16. What are the punishments? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Are there damages? Can suing spammers actually be a revenue stream for MS?

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  17. Harrassment isn't free speech by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 3, Insightful

    KKK rallies are allowed to romp through cities

    But they're not allowed to come into people's houses and harrass them. Not if they don't want to be charged with trespassing and breaking & entering--and that's assuming the house owner's shotgun doesn't do them in first (assuming the state has sane home defence laws). That's the difference.

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
  18. Today's MS Friend-o-meter reading by Linuxathome · · Score: 4, Funny
    Friend [---------------*--] Foe
    Two notches towards friend since yesterday.
  19. WHY it won't work by aws910 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It will not do anything to stop the spead of spam, and this is why:

    These 120 spammers represent a very small section of the entire spammer population, and I doubt that they've got big guys like Ralsky on it. You won't see M$ getting anywhere near the spam gangs, either. In fact, when you think about it, M$ is the reason some spam gangs even exist! Think about all the security holes in XP that allow it to be hijacked and used as a spam relay. Also, think about the "open-relay-by-default" nature of some M$ mailserver products. Maybe these lawsuits are Microsoft's way of saying "Our bad!"

    Given the difficulty/cost of tracking down spammers and nailing them, I think it will just turn spamming into a different industry. The (smart) spammers will just go farther underground and become more sophisticated in their ways of avoiding detection/liability. These 120 guys were probably just amateurs that didn't know what they were doing anyway.

  20. Re:I've had it by NuclearDog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Because of you anti spam whacko zealots who dont know how to delete an email message .. people's civil liberties are going down the tube and the govt. is hunting down people who are just trying to make a living .. freaking DEAL WITH THE GODDAMN INCONVENIENCE.

    People dont mind rapists and murderes getting away .. but they want to skin alive anyone who causes them 1 second of delay. And yes an individual email only takes up one second of your time. I understand you get lots of spam from different sources .. but how can you punish someone who's doing what a lot of others are doing .. The punishments that the spammers receive is assymetrical revenge considering that the particular individual actually only cause one or two seconds of inconvenience per victim."


    Let's assume you're correct in saying it only takes 2 seconds per message, although I think it takes a bit more.

    If we assume 1 million copies of the message are sent out and reach someone's inbox, that's 2000000 seconds, or about 555.5 hours, collectively taken by that spammer.

    If we assume that all these people were making a mere $8 an hour, that's now $4444.00 that spammer has cost.

    That's not very realistic, though. Let's assume that 5 million messages found their way into some inboxes, and all the people were paid $25/hour and it took them 5 seconds to delete.

    5000000*5/60/60*25 == $173611.12

    Now, with about 100 messages a day finding their way into the average inbox (wild guess), that's $17,361,112.00 it has cost.

    Still think it's a minor inconvenience?

    "I understand you get lots of spam from different sources .. but how can you punish someone who's doing what a lot of others are doing .."

    So because Hitler killed a shit-load of jews (yes I know, some law about the longer a usenet thread continues, the more likely a comparison to Hitler & Nazis is...) and was never punished for it (he killed himself before anyone else got to him), we should let other people attempt to kill off a race without punishing them as long as they kill themselves once they're done?

    Come on, that's just weak.

    ND

    --
    This statement is forty-five characters long.
  21. Microsoft's True Motive by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 3, Funny

    The company is diversifying into... penis extensions!

    A whole new meaning to "embrace and extend".

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
  22. You know, you just illustrate the problem by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There used to be a time where we all actually opened emails from strangers in other countries.

    E.g., when I wrote that walkthrough of mine and put my real email address in it (again, spam was not yet a problem), it never occured to me that I'd ever want to discriminate against, say, gamers from Korea if they have questions.

    E.g., when I posted on newsgroups, I actually expected that some people would answer privately per email. No point in dragging the whole thread off-topic, after all. Some of them were, yes, in other countries. If I was talking about Linux or about 3D programming in assembly, I wasn't going to reject potentially valuable information from someone just because their email info is from Elbonia.

    The fact that nowadays email addresses are some jealously guarded family secret, and that we're gladly blocking whole countries or continents, is the effect of spam that I hate the most. It just shows the extent of the damage these fucks have done to this public resource.

    So, well, in fact I actually aggree to your point of view. Let them flee if they want to. Then we can block just the countries which still encourage them, and maybe reclaim our communication resource to the rest of them. Having a usable communication channel even to just half the world, is better than what we have today.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.