Slashdot Mirror


The Boy Who Would Live Forever

Motor writes with the review below of Frederik Pohl's The Boy Who Would Live Forever, a series book which he says escapes the release-early, release-often approach of some series. Read on for his take on the book. The boy who would live forever: A novel of Gateway author Frederik Pohl pages 384 publisher Tor Books rating 8/10 reviewer Motor ISBN 076531049X summary The latest Gateway novel The Boy Who Would Live Forever is a Gateway novel. I am sure a big proportion of Slashdot readers need no introduction to Frederik Pohl's Gateway universe. But here goes:

The original novel Gateway, published in 1976, was a Hugo and Nebula award winner and quickly burned itself into the memory of many SF readers. It told the story of the discovery of an asteroid full of alien (the Heechee) ships. The ships are completely functional, but with no way to decode the navigation controls the only possible trips are... well... mysterious. Desperate prospectors from a poverty- and famine-stricken Earth travel to the Gateway asteroid (as it becomes known) to take a trip in a Heechee ship hoping to find something unusual, and perhaps earn themselves a share in the Gateway Corporation. Some never return; some return only after their food and oxygen has long run out; some are sent to destinations that kill the occupants of the craft; a lucky few return to enormous wealth. Later books in the series expanded on the premise and the reasons why the Heechee abandoned many of their vessels and tunnels and vanished.

The Boy Who Would Live Forever is the sixth book in the series. The word 'series' stirs up thoughts of those interminable fantasy or SF series that are pumped out at regular intervals for cash. Gateway books, on the other hand, are pretty rare things:

  • Gateway (1976)
  • Beyond the Blue Event Horizon (1980)
  • Heechee Rendezvous (1984)
  • Annals of the Heechee (1987)
  • The Gateway Trip (1990)
  • The Boy Who Would Live Forever: A Novel of Gateway (2004)

So a new one is something to look forward to -- at least for me.

The Boy Who Would Live Forever (TBWWLF) begins with the story of Stan, a young man growing up virtually penniless in Istanbul. After his father dies he inherits a life insurance payoff that is just enough to take him and a friend to Gateway. Unfortunately Stan's long-awaited first trip in a Heechee ship comes to nothing. Even worse, he returns to Gateway to find that the secret of Heechee ship navigation has been cracked. No more wild rides into the unknown... and no more big payoffs. But Stan somehow finds himself on a Gateway trip that will make him one of the first humans to find the elusive Heechee.

Other narrative threads involve Gelle-Klara Moynlin: a character from previous books who spent time trapped and frozen in time at the event horizon of a black hole. Marc Anthony: an artificial intelligence, Gourmet cook, and numerous other talents besides. Wan: a rich spoiled psychotic who grew up on a Heechee artifact (the child of stranded Gateway prospectors) and his attempt to get get hold of a weapon capable of destroying a star. Sigfried von Shrink: the A.I psychotherapist from the first Gateway novel makes a repeat appearance. That rarest of things, a mentally unstable Heechee: made that way, unsurprisingly, by having to live with humans. And more details on the Kugels -- or "The Foe" as the Heechee call them -- a race of energy creatures hell-bent on eliminating organic intelligences.

Like most of Pohl's work, TBWWLF has plenty of humour and insight. Cultural misunderstandings between the amiable Heechee and the slightly clueless Stan provide plenty of opportunity for sly jokes, and Wan's obsession with getting back "his" Old Ones (the Australopithecus pre-humans he grew up with on the Heechee artifact) and their lack of personal hygiene are played for a few gags.

Despite being a novel, TBWWLF has been constructed from a number of short stories ("From Istanbul to the Stars", "In the Steps of Heroes", "A Home for the Old Ones", "Hatching the Phoenix") with original material added to tie them together. This is the cause of its only major fault: it is quite disjointed. Some of that is inevitable given that a big chunk part of the novel takes place within a black hole. But even allowing for the difficulties of stitching together a story from threads crossing a time dilation of 40,000:1... in which some of your characters only experience a week or two while others experience a thousands years... the novel still does not hold together satisfactorily as a story. There are entire chapters devoted to a faster-than-light trip to watch the Crab Nebula supernova occur and see the occupants of a planet of that system in its final days. Fascinating it may be (and it is), but it never really feels like part of the novel. The varied threads do eventually come together to provide a conclusion of sorts, but taken as a whole the book is really more of a tour of the Gateway universe.

However, I don't want to give the impression that this is a bad thing. Anyone familiar with the earlier books will find plenty to enjoy. Much of TBWWLF is concerned with filling in the gaps left by previous books -- such as telling the story of humanity's first contact with the Heechee, and some of the religious implications of machine storing humans when their organic bodies run out. New readers, though, might find themselves a bit lost among all the A.Is, downloaded humans, prayer fans, Ones, Twos and Fives.

The Boy Who Would Live Forever does have its faults as a novel, but it is a genuinely enjoyable read and it is a welcome addition to the Gateway series. One can only hope that Pohl is able to continue it.

You can purchase the Boy Who Would Live Forever from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

142 comments

  1. My shorter review: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    My amateur review:

    Even though I haven't read the initial segments of the serious (I certainly will do now), I really enjoyed this book, and wasn't lost at despite my lack of knowledge of events in the prior installments, and the fairly complex themes. The science seems to suspend disbelief a hell of a lot more than most Sci-Fi books I've read, that was one of the important things that set it apart from other close contenders in my opinion. It's got an extremely dark nature about it, appealing to me, but that's down to particular tastes. In the end: turns out he doesn't live forever. To summarize: enthralling, dark, and humours read, with imaginative, and believable science.

    1. Re:My shorter review: by krich · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      Here's a clue, AC: even amateur reviews shouldn't give away the ending, you dick!

    2. Re:My shorter review: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now why the hell did someone mod this guys post as Flamebait!? He's right on here.. this "amateur reviewer" needs to have his head kicked in for giving away the ending. Asshat.

  2. Excerpt by kngthdn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Amazon.com has the first six pages on their website.

    1. Re:Excerpt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice job trying to get some amazon referral $$$ ...

    2. Re:Excerpt by kngthdn · · Score: 1

      Actually, I hadn't thought of that. Oh, well...

  3. Until the cows come home... by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
    > Desperate prospectors from a poverty- and famine-stricken Earth travel to the Gateway asteroid (as it becomes known) to take a trip in a Heechee ship hoping to find something unusual, and perhaps earn themselves a share in the Gateway Corporation. Some never return; some return only after their food and oxygen has long run out; some are sent to destinations that kill the occupants of the craft; a lucky few return to enormous wealth.

    ...in the form of personal computers casemodded to resemble cows. Spending too much time at the Gateway Corporation can do that sort of thing to you.

  4. Born 1919 by nagora · · Score: 4, Informative
    Just in case anyone was wondering just how old Fred Pohl is these days. Pretty good going to still be an active writer.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    1. Re:Born 1919 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was! I think he's "lapped" Philip K. Dick for longevity.

    2. Re:Born 1919 by tetsuji · · Score: 1
      That was, in fact the first thing that came to my mind when I saw this headline. I went to a talk he gave something like 15 years ago, and he looked ancient then.

      My first thought was, "Ye gods, he's still alive???"

    3. Re:Born 1919 by blakjack · · Score: 1

      Just in case anyone was wondering just how old Fred Pohl is these days.

      Yes, i'm still wondering how old he is. Do you actually expect me to do the math?
    4. Re:Born 1919 by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      One of the few SF writers who have kept going withour turning into an old fart recycling the stories from their youth (Niven). He's improved as a writer and still does very interesting readable stuff, as he has for the last 50 years.

  5. The Boy Who Would Live Forever by BRSQUIRRL · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it just me, or does that sound like it should be the title of a Heinlein book?

    1. Re:The Boy Who Would Live Forever by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Yes, however I don't believe this book contains any immortal immoral supermen who bed every women (and most of the men) in the galaxy while not so secretly lusting after their mother. Who happens to be a super genius that developed the first AI/machine that travels to other universes/star ship and a crack sharp shooter to boot. Neither of them will be detailing their ideas on how the universe should work through 10 page monolouges complaining about the idiocy of the comman man.

      But perhaps I'm wrong.

    2. Re:The Boy Who Would Live Forever by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      > Is it just me, or does that sound like it should be the title of a Heinlein book?

      No, that'd be more like The Boy Who Would Live Forever While Simultaneously Having Freaky Sex With Superwomen Who Are Oddly Submissive In The Bedroom And Spouting Off About Weird-Ass Libertarian-Fascist-Anarchic Politics.

    3. Re:The Boy Who Would Live Forever by TurtlesAllTheWayDown · · Score: 1
      close, but no Tiptree:

      The Boy Who Waterskied to Forever (1982)

  6. I read this book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, I have to start by saying that I really enjoy Frederik Pohl's writing. Gateway, Annals of the Heechee and now The Boy Who Would Live Forever are all interesting books with unusual twists and refreshing new ideas. This book crosses many genres and should appeal readers of all of them: sci fi, tech thriller, and romance. To start, this book goes into great depth about the computer industry. I have to assume whatever Frederik Pohlis writing about is viable and true because I do not have a deep understanding of computers, programming, and other related fields.

    Let me move on here to the characters. I had a real problem in the beginning of the story. Stan was just so far out there that I had no sympathy with him at all. It took a long time to drag me back around to appreciate him and even then, in the end, I am still not sure that this was accomplished. Marc Anthony on the other hand was an incredible character. Every scene he was in, he stole the show. I kept reading to see his character develop and mature.

    My biggest problems come about with the relationship that grows between these two characters. It kept crossing my mind that Stan looks at this relationship as a mother/child one. (At least at first). That they get romantically involved, brings up some issues I was a little uncomfortable with. I have to say, if nothing else, this book is thought provoking. I enjoyed reading it.

  7. Series Books For Money by Rheagar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The reviewer decides to bash book series that come out more frequently than once every four years, implying that they are just out for money.
    Now, Robert Jordan is one thing. But if you can manage to get past that you will find some great series fantasy that does go to print more frequently. Some great examples are:
    (1) George R R Martin's Song of Ice and Fire. This is my favorite series of all. The characters are realistic, the story draws you in, and the outcome is anything but expected. I could only wish that these books came out every month.
    (2) Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game and Tales of Alvin Maker series. Card is a great storyteller who dreams up tales that capture your imagination with stories of what might have been or what might be.
    (3) David Duncan's Tale of the King's Blades series mixes swordplay with interesting storylines. The books are truly exciting recounts of great adventures.
    I'd just like to point out that some of the "other" series out there are more than just cash cows.

    When will Robert Jordan ever finish his series?

    1. Re:Series Books For Money by mavi_yelken · · Score: 1

      I got quickly sick of Robert Jordan's The Wheel of Time series. It is the lineage II of fantasy literature.

    2. Re:Series Books For Money by joeldg · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think everyone is afraid he is going to die before he finishes it..
      Then we would all be just stuck here wondering what the hell...

    3. Re:Series Books For Money by Wizzy+Wig · · Score: 1

      A moment of silence for Roger Zelazny. His "Amber" series was the highlight of my sci fi reading youth.

    4. Re:Series Books For Money by thefon · · Score: 1

      Amber was a highlight for many of us, alas. For something like a fix for your Amber addiction, have you tried the "Well-favored Man" series by Elizabeth Willey?

    5. Re:Series Books For Money by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      No, but I will.

      Poor Roger. One of the best, both for Amber and most of the other things he wrote (check out the Zelazny/Phillip Dick collaboration Deus Irae).

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    6. Re:Series Books For Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reviewer decides to bash book series that come out more frequently than once every four years, implying that they are just out for money.

      The reviewer, Motor, slammed "those interminable fantasy or SF series that are pumped out at regular intervals for cash". Nowhere did Motor say that any quickly-written books suck.

    7. Re:Series Books For Money by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

      (1) George R R Martin's Song of Ice and Fire. This is my favorite series of all. The characters are realistic, the story draws you in, and the outcome is anything but expected. I could only wish that these books came out every month.

      I just have to echo your sentiments that this is one of the best series I have ever read. I love how he has no particular attachments to his characters, and yet how he doesn't forget any of them either - every single chapter is as interesting as the last and I don't have the slightest urge to skip any of them.

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
    8. Re:Series Books For Money by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1

      Thank god there isn't a new R.R.Martin book each month! I'd never get any sleep!

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    9. Re:Series Books For Money by John+Bokma · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A moment of silence for Roger Zelazny
      When I had to come up with a name for my company I picked Castle Amber http://castleamber.com/. But the SF + Fantasy writer I like the most is still Jack Vance, with Stephen Donaldson second.
    10. Re:Series Books For Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 insightful

      Hell I have a hard time getting to sleep sometimes because I'm RE-reading them.

    11. Re:Series Books For Money by Trillan · · Score: 1

      I just want to echo your GRRM and OSC recommendations. OSC writes a lot of other stuff, too, and I've read most of it. His least interesting work so far is the Ender's series, which is what he's most famous for, and that was still pretty darned good.

    12. Re:Series Books For Money by TheDauthi · · Score: 1

      When people stop paying for it.

    13. Re:Series Books For Money by khallow · · Score: 1

      I haven't read the other series, but both of Orson Scott Card's series show significant decline in quality after the first couple of novels. I believe there's a credible reason to be suspicious even of good authors that produce too much. OTOH, if your standards were sufficiently low to begin with, then even pulp series like old time Doc Savage or almost everything by Piers Anthony can meet it without slithering off the ground.

    14. Re:Series Books For Money by Motor · · Score: 1

      The reviewer decides to bash book series that come out more frequently than once every four years, implying that they are just out for money.

      No I didn't. As it happens I was thinking particularly of Robert Jordan when I mentioned interminable fantasy series, but I never once said that books written more frequently than every four years are just pumped out for cash.

      --
      We all know that crap is king
      Give us dirty laundry!
    15. Re:Series Books For Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's just a pity that Orson Scott Card is such a bigoted asshole in real life.

      He's homophobic, militaristic, overly religious and a zealot - basically he is the Bush of sci-fi authors.

      He may write well, but there's no way I am ever paying to read another of his books. No money of mine will go toward him ever again.

    16. Re:Series Books For Money by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1

      He's homophobic, militaristic, overly religious and a zealot - basically he is the Bush of sci-fi authors.

      How so? There is plenty of theological discussion in his books, often from the point of view of someone who isn't Mormon or even religious. I generally get the impression through his work that he is pretty level-headed with respect to religion, and his characters are all extremely human with flaws and virtues intact. If Bush were to write Ender's Game, Ender would have tried to convert the Buggers before destroying them.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    17. Re:Series Books For Money by tm2b · · Score: 2
      He's homophobic
      How so?
      Gee, I don't know where anybody would get that idea.. I mean, he only sanctions state action against homosexuals.
      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    18. Re:Series Books For Money by dhuff · · Score: 1

      Great googly-moogly, I read that screed of his on the nauvoo.com site and was almost physically sick. I can't believe I have this bigoted, religious wingnut's stuff on my shelves. Every one of them's going in the trash tomorrow.

      Dammit! I can't believe I actually supported this jerk by buying his books...

    19. Re:Series Books For Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where as i quickly got sick of grr's stuff. if I want reality i'll read nonfiction and learn some things thank you.

      *probably re reading wot for the 20th time myself, ( it goes by fast if you skip the female parts)

    20. Re:Series Books For Money by tm2b · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to have informed someone, please pass it on. Not nearly enough people know what they're supporting when they buy his books.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    21. Re:Series Books For Money by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1


      What he writes is consistent within his belief system, and it shows a pretty well-thought-out theological basis for his opinions. He is also consistent in saying that he is an advocate of free speech, and he is consistent in saying that sinners are still worthy of love and compassion. None of this is homophobia or zealotry, because of the lack of knee-jerk thoughtless bantering.

      Now, for your sake, I will say that I don't agree with most of his opinions, but I do respect the fact that he has spent more time thinking about the basis for his beliefs than 99% of all people combined. While I wouldn't vote for him if he ran for President, I can still find it within myself to read his work.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    22. Re:Series Books For Money by tm2b · · Score: 1
      None of this is homophobia or zealotry, because of the lack of knee-jerk thoughtless bantering.
      Thoughtful, well-considered homophobia (but still with an irrational basis) is still homophobia. For me, he loses the benefit of the doubt when he says that there's a compelling state interest to legislate against gays.
      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    23. Re:Series Books For Money by eikonos · · Score: 1

      We'll just take the existing Wheel of Time books, feed them into a text synthesis engine and let it write any number of sequels. In fact, that's probably what Robert Jordan does now..

    24. Re:Series Books For Money by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      (2) Orson Scott Card

      For those who tend to follow a favorite author as he wanders far afield from the SCi-Fi genra, Orson is one such writer that should be followed.

      He has, over the last 2-3 years, embarked on a "Women of Genesis" series, starting first with Abrahams wife Sarah, and one on Rebecca which also takes place in Abrahams time.

      If you see one or the other of those titles on the shelf, its well worth your bucks as both are a plumb enjoyable read.

      While the bible (and many of the worlds religious tomes also do this) tends to treat its women as almost afterthoughts with a few exceptions, Orson attempts to fill in the human side of these women without doing anything but putting himself in their place and thinking what would I have done if that was me sort of a scenario. He puts an all too human face on Sarahs apparent infertility and suffering because of it, a thread that runs as an undercurrent through much of that book. I recommend them both, and am looking for the third, which hasn't (AFAIK) been named yet.

      Cheers, Gene

    25. Re:Series Books For Money by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      I can't believe I have this bigoted, religious wingnut's stuff on my shelves. Every one of them's going in the trash tomorrow.

      Nothing like a little more bigoted zealotry to even the score, eh?

      If Pohl's offensive beliefs show up in his work, then condemn the work itself as offensive, judging it on its merits or lack thereof. If they don't show up, then... judge it on its merits or lack thereof. Leave the author out of it. For all we know, Bill Shakespeare went around telling cruel jokes about bouggerers, but that wouldn't make Hamlet itself any less worthy of praise.

      If you don't want to buy Pohl's books because you don't want to do business with him, that's a legitimate form of economic activism. (I shop the same way myself... still can't bring myself to buy Coors, and I avoid Amway like the plague.) But throwing out whatever books of his you already possess (sending them to the incinerator, perhaps?), simply because he wrote them, is little better than labeling a painting "degenerate" because of who created it.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    26. Re:Series Books For Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anne McCaffrey's Dragon series is one of the most over-rated "classic" series in the history of sf.It's basically a horse story a la Walter Farley crossed with a soap opera. Instead of horses you have dragons. "That special bond between dragon and rider." Bleeccchh. Excuse me while I go "between". And she can't even have a real enemy. No, there's this inorganic "thread" that they have to jump on their dragons and go fight. Gimme a break. I can't believe people swallow this crap.

    27. Re:Series Books For Money by AigariusDebian · · Score: 1

      I am the lead developer of Amber Linux, I had to reason the name to the stakeholders so I had to base it on the fact that it is developed in Baltics and that Baltics are commonly associated with amber. :)

    28. Re:Series Books For Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "can't believe I have this bigoted, religious wingnut's stuff on my shelves. Every one of them's going in the trash tomorrow."

      You're now being bigoted and intolerant.

      ALSO you liked his books before. Now because you realize he's "gay/antigay" you are going to throw his books away.

    29. Re:Series Books For Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the links. The spin is much worse than his actual stated beliefs, which he's certainly entitled to. His religion states homosexuality is a sin -- and he agrees with it. And this is a shock to you? Nowhere in his words is the word "hate" used. In fact, it's almost certainly a case of "hate the sin, love the sinner."

    30. Re:Series Books For Money by tm2b · · Score: 1
      The spin is much worse than his actual stated beliefs, which he's certainly entitled to. His religion states homosexuality is a sin -- and he agrees with it. And this is a shock to you? Nowhere in his words is the word "hate" used. In fact, it's almost certainly a case of "hate the sin, love the sinner."
      Not caring a whole lot, here. The moment he endorses (as he does) the criminalization of homosexulaity (and worse, the selective enforcement of such laws), he's a clear and present danger to the freedom of our society.

      If he wants to huddle in a cave with his other supersitious whack-jobs, that's his business. If he wants to fuck with nonbelievers through government action, he and his influence needs to be fought.
      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    31. Re:Series Books For Money by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Sure it is. And that's fine. The guy's allowed to think whatever the hell he wants, and to peacefully try to convince others to believe along with him.

      You know, freedom of opinion, freedom of expression, and in this particular case, freedom of religion?

      I don't agree with the guy, but I think he writes a good story. So, I read his stories, while quietly ignoring his politics.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    32. Re:Series Books For Money by tm2b · · Score: 1

      And what do you think I'm doing, but peacefully making people aware of what he (and the money his fans gives him) supports?

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    33. Re:Series Books For Money by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      True, true. I suppose that what I'm objecting to is your use of the word 'homophobia.' I don't think he has an irrational fear of homosexuals; he just doesn't agree with it, for various reasons.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  8. Heechee series... by mavi_yelken · · Score: 1

    Are suggested reading for any SF fan. Very strong stories, certainly thougt-provoking.

  9. Gateway corperation? by wcitechnologies · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Gateway corperation is involved in the story? Do they buy up a crappy computer company called E-Machines in an effort to thwart their inevitible bankrupcy?

    --
    Electrons are free; it is moving them that becomes expensive.
  10. clarification please by XO · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now, was the boy from Istanbul, or was he from Constantinople?

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    1. Re:clarification please by brianerst · · Score: 1

      It's nobody's business but the Turks...

    2. Re:clarification please by jaylee7877 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's nobody's business but the Turks...

    3. Re:clarification please by mavi_yelken · · Score: 1

      He is from Istanbul, and I am a Turk. Careful.

    4. Re:clarification please by magarity · · Score: 1

      from Istanbul, or was he from Constantinople?

      Funny?!? Heck, it's 'interesting'; he's from the future so they may well have switched the name back by then!

    5. Re:clarification please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so are these guys. what's your point?

    6. Re:clarification please by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Even old New York was once New Amsterdam.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    7. Re:clarification please by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      So does that make New New York the new old New Amsterdam?

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    8. Re:clarification please by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      Constantinople was what the St. Constantine the Great (a Roman emperor) renamed the city when he moved the seat of government thereto. In practise, it became known as 'istan poli', 'the city' in Greek (much like London was known as 'town' for a period in England). 'Istanbul' is just a corruption of 'istan poli' by the Turks who invaded, raped and pillaged their way into ownership of the crown jewel of civilisation.

  11. Eschaton! by X_Caffeine · · Score: 1

    I'm really bummed that his Eschaton books didn't capture the public's imagination quite the way the Heechee books did. Well, perhaps they weren't quite as good, but they were darned good, and still don't feel quite concluded.

    --
    // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
    1. Re:Eschaton! by Bob+Hearn · · Score: 1

      Oooohhhh... the first Eschaton book was... interesting. I can't say it really stood on its own. It required some pretty damn explanations from the other two books. Alas, it was downhill from there (sort of like the Matrix...). By the time I finished the third one, I was furious that I'd wasted my time with them at all, waiting for a payoff that never came. If that's what you mean by not quite concluded, I guess I agree.

      Gateway, now, that's a classic. Required reading! But overall, IMO, the Heechee series had a downward arc (though the rest were still readable). I read a devasating review of TBWWLF the other day, and I was not surprised. Well, maybe I'll give it a chance anyway, in paperback...

      Man Plus is another great Pohl book with an atrocious sequel, Mars Plus. Although to be fair, Pohl only co-wrote Mars Plus; maybe most of the blame lies with his co-author, Thomas T. Thomas (although I liked his story in Man Kzin Wars V).

  12. The gateway series. by Zangief · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The gateway series is genial. Period.

    Once, I readed that Pohl asked Asimov permission to continue the Foundation Saga (in the 70's decade), and Asimov considered this offer, and finally denied it.

    Seeing how Pohl has become a better writer with the years, and the crap that it is anything Foundation written after the original trilogy, I think this is the single greatest lost opportunity of the science fiction,
    --
    Wiki de Ciencia Ficcion y Fantasia

    1. Re:The gateway series. by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      I think that if the 'crap' moniker should apply to anything Asimov, it would be his early fiction, not the later stuff. He was never as good a writer as many of his peers, but he did show a lot of improvement over the years.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    2. Re:The gateway series. by Zangief · · Score: 1

      It's all a matter of taste. However, in the latter Foundation novels, he betrayed himself, and retconned the originally self contained Foundation Trilogy, with his robots stories, which, IMHO, were of a much lower quality. And you cannot but feel underwhelmed, when the original trilogy is left as a small annotation of his whole (and completely not epic, ordinary) universe.

    3. Re:The gateway series. by quantax · · Score: 1

      I would disagree that the entire series is genial as I found the books that came after the original, Gateway, to be weaker by comparison to the book that started it all. In a certain respect, though we all wanted to learn about the Heechee, I almost regret how much Pohl 'gives away' in the last couple books. There was a certain atmosphere brought to the book with the mystery that surrounded the Heechee technology, and this was lost in the later books. I will say however that by normal standards the later books were still good and I definitely enjoyed them, though less than the first.

      --
      "What can a thoughtful man hope for mankind on Earth, given the experience of the past million years? Nothing." -Bokonon
    4. Re: The gateway series. by gidds · · Score: 1
      he did show a lot of improvement over the years.

      Maybe in the big-ideas and backstory departments, but his characters and dialogue could have done with a boost. Even setting aside the huge numbers of dashes that his characters somehow managed to pronounce, they all turned into excessively polite robots, with no inner emotion, which spoke in a strange, mannered, long-winded fashion.

      He was still worth reading even then, of course. Though, interestingly enough, his last book (Forward the Foundation) did seem a lot closer to his earlier style, which fitted in the timeline very well.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    5. Re: The gateway series. by gidds · · Score: 1
      The gateway series is genial.

      I hate to do this, as it looks like English isn't your native language, but did you mean 'genius' (inspired, of exceptional intellectual or creative power) instead of 'genial' (sociable, friendly, cheerful)?

      Anyway, thanks to you and the others who've recommended the series, it's now high on my to-read list, so thanks!

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    6. Re: The gateway series. by Zangief · · Score: 1

      No, please, correct me anytime you can!

      It helps a lot.

    7. Re:The gateway series. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've often compared Pohl to Asimov -- the two are/were contemporaries, even growing up in the same neighborhood (read Pohl's "The Way The Future Was" for more details on the good ol' days) -- and I've always been more impressed by Pohl as a writer. Even his earlier work: I thought "Space Merchants" and "Drunkard's Walk" were just awesome.

      Never knew that Pohl wanted to continue the Foundation saga. Learn something new every day!

    8. Re:The gateway series. by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      The gateway series is genial.

      Are you sure you're using that word correctly? I don't think it means what you think it means.

  13. Where are all the crap books? by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We have a reviewer who admits to being a fan and basically says there is no story is not that good but its still worth buying and hopes the author can carry on with same. WTF sort of review is that?

    I can only take from this that while the original idea had some merit this book must really suck.

    Why do no reviewers here ever say do not buy this book, its not that good?

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Where are all the crap books? by kwalker · · Score: 1

      My guess would be because books that are on the "do not buy" list aren't worth reviewing, or even finishing for that matter. Personally, I've gotten part way into a few of those type of books and I wouldn't even bother telling anyone about them, let alone writing a rewview.

      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
    2. Re:Where are all the crap books? by jumpingfred · · Score: 1

      I heard an interview with the editor of an alternative weekly paper discuss why he only published good reviews for books and music. His response was there was not enough space to review all the books and music that come out so he thought people would like to know about good books and music that they would enjoy rather than what not to get. Things that were bad did not merit space in the paper.

    3. Re:Where are all the crap books? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is no story is not that good but its still worth buying and hopes the author can carry on with same.

      From the review:

      its only major fault: it is quite disjointed.

      The varied threads do eventually come together to provide a conclusion of sorts, but taken as a whole the book is really more of a tour of the Gateway universe.

      However, I don't want to give the impression that this is a bad thing. Anyone familiar with the earlier books will find plenty to enjoy.


      So to you, "a tour of the Gateway universe" and "plenty to enjoy" adds up to "no story is not that good"? "this book must really suck"?

      You got modded insightful for this?

      What I took away from the review: the book is a must-read if you are a fan of the Gateway series, and the reviewer liked it and recommends it.

      What you took away from the review: crap book WTF.

      Maybe you should RTFA. Or, read and understand the FA.

    4. Re:Where are all the crap books? by Motor · · Score: 1

      We have a reviewer who admits to being a fan and basically says there is no story

      No I didn't.

      is not that good

      No I didn't.

      but its still worth buying

      No I didn't -- I never suggested anyone buy anything.

      and hopes the author can carry on with same.

      First thing you've actually got right.

      WTF sort of review is that

      An honest one. I like the Gateway novels, but even I found the that it didn't work all that well as a novel. Nevertheless, I enjoyed it for what it was, a series of short stories tied together and as a tour of the Gateway universe... and anyone else who liked the previous book will likely enjoy this one. But new readers would probably end up confused. Was there something confusing about the summing up?

      I tried to weigh up the good and bad, and make anyone reading the review understand what they would get out of the book.

      --
      We all know that crap is king
      Give us dirty laundry!
    5. Re:Where are all the crap books? by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 1
      ...and what website was it you thought you were reading again? The one I'm reading isn't known for objectivity on the particular topics of discussion that arise here...

      ex.:

      Latest Gnome Release...But Why?
      From the bubblegum-and-bailing-wire dept.

      News flash, the latest Gnome packages are up on the server...actually, X tends to crash my box more often than Windows did, and I spend more time fixing Mandrake than actually using it, and I should just reinstall Windows or buy a Mac...but what the heck, I have some free bandwidth on my 33.6k and limitless time!

      never happen.

      ok, flame away!

      --
      My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
    6. Re:Where are all the crap books? by ruprechtjones · · Score: 1

      If you're a fan of Pohl, then it's a great review. I find Pohl's books odd and sometimes frustrating. But there are some great gems within his writings, and the payoff always out-weighs the frustrations.

      This review told me "After all these years, Pohl brings the same formula to the table." I wanted to hear about this, and I'm going to buy the book. The reviewer was honest, not gushing like a little fan-boi. Kudos to him for attempting to review someone as odd as Pohl in the first place.

      --
      Kip Hawley is an idiot.
  14. Depth and Development... by CygnusXII · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I read this book last weekend and found it a light read, and somewhat disappointing. More detail could have been added to "Wans'" Vastening, in that I wished that we could have seen further into his hastily done procedure and also more into his adaptation and development of his surroundings, instead of jumping into the Kill the Heechee, right off the bat scenario. I dunno, it seemed to be more of a get-er-done than a really good wrap up, like all of the other books. I mean I have read the other Heechee books several times, and they were page turners all the way through, and the stories made you want to jump right into the next novel in the series. I didn't getthe feeling with this one.

    --
    My cat's picked up a Hammer. HEY! Put down that Hammer. Put Down that Hamm...THUNK!
  15. Check out the Sparrow by WankersRevenge · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've never read the above book, but it reminds me of a very insightful book called "The Sparrow" by Maria Doria Russell. It is about a group of missionaries traveling to another planet via a spaceship built out of an asteroid. The characters are really fleshed out and the themes are something to chew on. It's basically about why you shouldn't break the star trek prime directive. It also debates science versus religion in a very thoughtful manner.

    Here's the amazon review:

    In 2019, humanity finally finds proof of extraterrestrial life when a listening post in Puerto Rico picks up exquisite singing from a planet which will come to be known as Rakhat. While United Nations diplomats endlessly debate a possible first contact mission, the Society of Jesus quietly organizes an eight-person scientific expedition of its own. What the Jesuits find is a world so beyond comprehension that it will lead them to question the meaning of being "human." When the lone survivor of the expedition, Emilio Sandoz, returns to Earth in 2059, he will try to explain what went wrong... Words like "provocative" and "compelling" will come to mind as you read this shocking novel about first contact with a race that creates music akin to both poetry and prayer.

    1. Re:Check out the Sparrow by centauri · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Man I hated that book. They go through the whole mission thinking how blessed they all are and when things go to pot the survivor never considers that there might not be a god, only that God has betrayed him.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Durga.
    2. Re:Check out the Sparrow by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Is it so hard to believe that there is a God, and he's a rat bastard? Pretty easy for me to believe.

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    3. Re:Check out the Sparrow by DarthWiggle · · Score: 1

      Man, I couldn't disagree more with centauri's response to you. The Sparrow is a fantastic book. Irrespective of the philosophy/theology of the book, it's just a pleasure to read such extraordinary characters. Her humor is wonderful and subtle. And, ultimately, the questions she has about faith are disturbing and thought-provoking.

    4. Re:Check out the Sparrow by stove · · Score: 1

      I'd have to disagree. _The Sparrow_ seemed to be nothing more than a version of the "problem of evil" (if an all powerful God is good why is there evil?) in new clothes. Certainly Jesuits, if anyone, are mentally equipped to answer that question.
      The book was certainly well written, but kind of skipped over some of the more fascinating theological ideas (e.g. if there are intelligent aliens, what does that say about the Church? The Bible? God?)

      --
      Ack!
    5. Re:Check out the Sparrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there is a god, "he's" a natural law underlying everything, and doesn't care one shit about "his" complex emergent processes. IMNSHO.

    6. Re:Check out the Sparrow by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about natural underlying laws, I was talking about the complex and potentially semi-intelligent 'Ultimate Being' that so many groups of confused animals have deemed necessary to worship in exchange for... well, nothing.

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
  16. Release often? by zerocool^ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    release-early, release-often approach

    I'm looking at you, Robert Jordan.

    I would trade the Wheel of Time books 24-45 for A Feast for Crows.

    --
    sig?
    1. Re:Release often? by mpaque · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm looking forward to Volumes 12 through 14. Rumor is that another character takes a bath! I won't reveal the name, as that would spoil the fun.

    2. Re:Release often? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Funny

      Eh, I think we all know it's going to be Egwene. Egwene, taking bath after bath, ignorent of the source of her problems even after a giant magic sign decends from the heavens pointing with glowing arrow at it.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    3. Re:Release often? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do not refer to him as "Robert Jordan".

      His name is "Killer of Trees, despoiler of Forests".

    4. Re:Release often? by bhima · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I just have to vent after reading this comment...

      Never before have I read a series (and listened to the audio books) which made me suffer through such awful tripe to experience a small core of good ideas, story telling and fantasy. It is as if parts of a book geared towards 7 year olds were pasted in a book for folks at least in or past high-school. The recurring theme of the juvenile 'battle of the sexes' ruins the story and is out of place!

      oh... the audio aooks really are much better than just reading the paper books.

      I feel much better now...

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  17. He was from both place :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you call it Istanbul, Constantinople or Byzantium? Is it in Europe or Asia?

    Any way you look at it, this city resists labelling.

    1. Re:He was from both place :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any way you look at it, this city resists labelling.

      No it doesn't:

      Istanbul was Constantinople. Now it's Istanbul, not Constantinople. So if you've got a date in Constantinople she'll be waiting in Istanbul.

  18. Crows Feasting On Robert Jordan? by jefu · · Score: 1

    Absolutely. In fact George R. R. Martin's page on how "A Feast For Crows" is coming along is one of the few web pages I check regularly. Maybe done by the end of the year he says now. Ah, anticipation.

  19. Like the song says by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
    Like the song says:

    Now it's Istanbul, not Constantinople
    Been a long time gone, Constantinople

  20. Better review on amazon by CmdrSanity · · Score: 1

    I have read this book and I think a more accurate review is found on amazon.com

  21. scenes from a memory by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    Why is disjointed a fault?

    A favorite SF novel of mine is Harry Harrison's "One Step From Earth." Each chapter is a short story more or less centered around a method of instantaneous teleportion between any two points in the Universe. The first chapter tells of the initial discovery. Each subsequent chapter takes place further and further in the future. No real dates are given, but some of the jumps appear to be thousands, if not tens of thousand of years. Collectively they sketch out a basic history of humanity, and how teleportion shaped that history.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  22. Obligatory Baen Free Library Plug by LeninZhiv · · Score: 4, Informative

    On the OP's criticism "of those interminable fantasy or SF series that are pumped out at regular intervals for cash": Fans of Sci-Fi and Fantasy genre fiction should all be aware of the Baen free library , a simple and admirable approach to genre fiction. Check out the first (few) books of a series free, and if you like it, you can buy the rest on paper or electronically and in a non-DRM'd format. Finally a publisher who gets it!

    So, if you're a fan, check out the site, and if you're a writer looking to get published in Fantasy/Sci-fi fiction, look to Baen first and foremost as a geek-friendly and utterly avant-guard publisher. I will grant that I've only paid for 1 e-book from Baen heretofore (having read 4-5 freely), but that would definately have been 0 sales instead of 1 if they had not instituted the free library, so I still hold that the concept works and is fair. This is a system where you only pay for quality genre writing and I think that's exactly what a lot of readers have been waiting for.

  23. "One can only hope that Pohl is able to continue" by schmaltz · · Score: 1

    Indeed, if this is a compendium of earlier works, stitched together with some new text, that question is up for debate. He's got to be in better shape, though, than was Larry Niven when he took on the later [awful] Ringworld novels...

    --
    Big Daddy, Johnny, Burp, Aunt Zelda, Scott, Slurp, Big Momma ... where's Siggy?
  24. Re:Books By Emmanuel Hammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck is this at +5 For?!

  25. regular series by tin+foil+hat+dude · · Score: 1

    The length of time between books is just an author thing and not really anything else. David Gerrold has been promising book 5 in the war against the chtorr series for over 10 years, the first 4 being 83-85-89-93. While David Weber is cranking out an Honor Harrington book every year.

    Perhaps what is needed more than another author and a series are about 10 new sci-fi authors with new ideas.

    --
    Reality is all that stuff that doesn't care if you believe in it or not.--Solomon Short
    1. Re:regular series by Damvan · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that Gerrold has no intention of finishing the Chtorr series. IIRC, the interview I read said he was bored with the series and would likely not finish it.

    2. Re:regular series by tin+foil+hat+dude · · Score: 1

      http://www.gerrold.com

      Book 5 is implied to be done --may be waiting on reissue of first 4 since they are now out of print. He also says that since the mss for 5 was cut that he is now well into book 6.

      --
      Reality is all that stuff that doesn't care if you believe in it or not.--Solomon Short
    3. Re:regular series by Damvan · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link, I am glad to read that he is working on them. I had given up hope. Now I gotta find my copies of the first 4.

  26. Big age difference; suprising plug by StefanJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Niven is about twenty years younger than Pohl.

    I last saw Pohl in '97: Wrinkled, moved slowly, bad spine, but still full of piss and vinegar. (We'd put him on a panel with Vinge about the Singularity. Pohl thought the idea was as dumb as a bag of hammers, although I believe he anticipated the idea in his 1966 short story "Day Million.")

    Last saw Niven around 2000. (He was plugging _Ringworld Throne_, which would nail the date down.) Looked late middle age.

    If Niven's later Ringworld stuff is crappy, it's perhaps because he's not all that interested in the setting any more. Just going through the motions to keep the franchise going.

    Now, Niven and Pohl are pretty much on opposite sides of the political spectrum. Pohl was a boy communist (mostly for the dating opportunities) and a Democratic party worker. Niven . . . well, he's a Mulholland on his mother's side of the family. As in Mulholland Drive and old oil money. Niven's co-writer for many years was Jerry "Ghengis Khan was a damned liberal!" Pournelle.

    At this last appearance I caught, someone in the audiance asked Niven what SF authors he think should be put on a Presidential advisory panel in the case of alien contact. Paraphrasing: "I'd have to think about it, but to begin with it sure as hell should include Frederick Pohl."

    I thought that was pretty neat.

    Stefan

    1. Re:Big age difference; suprising plug by schmaltz · · Score: 1

      Great post. Good dirt! And just remember, TANSTAAFL! (a phrase I like to welcome our second term overlords with... :)

      --
      Big Daddy, Johnny, Burp, Aunt Zelda, Scott, Slurp, Big Momma ... where's Siggy?
  27. An honor by Bhrian · · Score: 1

    Several years ago I had to honor to meet Frederik Pohl at a science convention. After talking to him for a while, I discovered him to be an absolute gentleman. Finding an author that treats fans like that is a great surprise. So, there are two reasons to buy his books: his books are great and to support a great author.

  28. I used to be biggest fan of this religious nut! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to be biggest fan of this religious nut.

    I own 76 pohl books, many original era printings of them, and I own his memoir, signed by him.

    I loved them all.

    Then he released a novel before this one recently, and it had christianity poluting the plot!!!!

    not one reference to religion existed in ANY of his books EVER!

    His books are devoid of magic and jesus etc etc

    but i was so horrified by the semile ramblings of a fallen hero that i vowed to NEVER EVER let any more of his current writings destroy my view of him before he ruined a perfect carreer.

    no other SF author kept religion out of all works as well as pohl.

    i will not buy this book. not at all.

    i will cherish ALL the 76 pohl books i painstakingly collected and purchased.... many of the old paperbacks crumbling.... but no more will i ever be tricked.

    i was his biggest fan

    but that was before he allowed jesus into his festering senile old mind.

    1. Re:I used to be biggest fan of this religious nut! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who says fen are a contentious, bigoted lot?

      Which BNF asshole are you... Rich Brown?

    2. Re:I used to be biggest fan of this religious nut! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i am not that person and do not know what you mean by "bigoted"

      i hate all gods equally. every one. every religion!!!

      how is THAT bigoted.

      plus bigots have views on how people ar born... not their goddamned belief systems

      ANYONE is allowed to criticize a belief without fear of being called a bigot you asshole

      screw santa claus, screw jesus, screw budda, screw the easter bunny, goblins ghosts, etc

      oh yeah... i forgot screw you and the 'senile' pohl who should have stopped writing in 1995

      i collected my pohl collection to boast about with pride, i used to buy various pohl books as gifts and force them on friends, i used to deeply idolize the former man.

      i prefer the hardline athiest pohl

      now he can go and suck on the cock of jesus like he wants to.

  29. writing is not improved by starvation! by fermion · · Score: 1
    Many of the people who gave us the greatest fiction, science or otherwise, worked as writers to make money. There is nothing wrong with that. Heinlien wrote for money, and I am part of a large group that thinks he is one the defining force of post WWII SciFi. They wrote pulp for money, and the paid experience allowed them to be better writers. Of course todays writers are expected to starve while corporations profit off their efforts.

    Pohl is little different. I have bought and read every Pohl Book. He is an enjoyable light read, but still a pulp writer. Gateway is cool, but if Pohl is writing this instead of something else it is to leverage the Gateway brand.

    So, to summarize, it is no sin for a writer to write for cash. It is no sin for a writer to write while the idea is fresh in his or her head. Often the regularity of a series has more to do with the abilities of the writer than the availability of cash. The problem with some series, in fact, is that they are designed and written by committee, rather than the coherent creation of a brilliant mind. For the less literary folks, think Friends versus Absolutely Fabulous. Or that special season of B5 as compared to the others.

    In literature it is more often useful to focus on the use of the language, creative use of the medium, and overcoming limitations, rather than if the author received a quid for the effort.

    (One final thing. According to a forward by Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451 was written to pay the bills, in one run, at a rented typewriter, Maybe the threat of starvation does help motivate the writer. As it does us all.)

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  30. This was a NOVEL?? by Suchetha · · Score: 2, Informative

    i got myself a book back in 2002(???)

    it was a collection of shorts/novellas by soem of the top writers to expand the universes they created.

    Brin wrote about some of the dolphins from the Uplift Universe, Card wrote about how Ender met Jane, McCaffrey wrote a coda to "the ship who sang" and pohl WROTE THIS AS A SHORT. (there were others but those were my favourites)

    now the question is, did he write the short and say "hey this would make a great novel", or when he got the offer to do the compilation did he just hack the novel into a core book and put it out???

    of course i haven't read the book, so i can't say

    atb

    Suchetha

    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad
    1. Re:This was a NOVEL?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now the question is, did he write the short and say "hey this would make a great novel", or when he got the offer to do the compilation did he just hack the novel into a core book and put it out??? of course i haven't read the book, so i can't say

      The reviewer has read it, and answered your question. RTFA.

  31. Card by tm2b · · Score: 1

    Before you pay any more money to Card, read his Hypocrites of Homosexuality .

    --
    "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    1. Re:Card by TheLink · · Score: 1

      He seems to be quite reasonable.

      He's talking about those who claim to be LDS, are practicing homosexuals AND say it's fine. That would be hypocritical.

      It's just like those who claim to be LDS (or other Christians) and are committing adultery AND say it's fine. That would be hypocritical too.

      "We Latter-day Saints know that we are eternal beings who must gain control of our bodies and direct our lives toward the good of others in order to be worthy of an adult role in the hereafter. So the regulation of sexual drives is designated not just to preserve the community of the Saints but also to improve and educate the individuals within it. The Lord asks no more of its members who are tempted toward homosexuality than it does of its unmarried adolescents, its widows and widowers, its divorced members, and its members who never marry. Furthermore, the Lord even guides the sexual behavior of those who are married, expecting them to use their sexual powers responsibly and in a proportionate role within the marriage. "

      Card's ending paragraph: "I suppose I can take some comfort from the fact that over the years I have been savaged both for showing too much sympathy for the "abomination" of homosexuality and for showing too much "homophobic" opposition to the political agenda of the radical homosexual community. If either group of intolerant extremists felt comfortable with my works and my words, I would have reason to reexamine my position. As things stand right now, however, I think I am annoying exactly the right people on both sides, and so will continue as I have in the past, to attempt to discover the truth of every aspect of human life and then to tell what truth I believe I have found, as best I can, in both my fiction and my nonfiction. "

      --
    2. Re:Card by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      What's your problem? He doesn't advocate violence or intolerance: rather, he just notes that many homosexuals define themselves by their sexuality, and that this is incompatible with a faith which requires its members to define themselves thereby (a man cannot serve two masters, after all). He also points out that the Mormons require no more of homosexuals than they do of the unmarried, the divorced &c. (nowadays--they used to be a lot laxer).

      I'm not a Mormon, and indeed I don't find them to even be Christian, but if Card's remarks are representative of their beliefs then it seems to me that they are quite tolerant.

      Or did you wish him to be accepting of buggery?

    3. Re:Card by tm2b · · Score: 1
      He's talking about those who claim to be LDS, are practicing homosexuals AND say it's fine. That would be hypocritical.
      Didn't read the whole thing in the middle, did you? He starts just talking about the LDS context (and that's fine - he's got as much a right to his intolerent supersitious cult as the next guy does) but he leads then into talking about the government:
      This applies also to the polity, the citizens at large. Laws against homosexual behavior should remain on the books, not to be indiscriminately enforced against anyone who happens to be caught violating them, but to be used when necessary to send a clear message that those whoflagrantly violate society's regulation of sexual behavior cannot be permitted to remain as acceptable, equal citizens within that society.
      So he condones not only laws against homosexuals, but also selective enforcement, leaving it up to the whims of law enforcement as to whether to bust someone. To me, that represents someone who needs to be resisted as much as possible.
      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    4. Re:Card by tm2b · · Score: 1
      What's your problem? He doesn't advocate violence or intolerance.
      Er, actually he does. And that is my problem.

      He can throw gays out of his little Christianoid club if he likes, out of contempt for their beliefs - that's his right, just as it's my right to have contempt for his beliefs. But when he starts talking about government action, it's time to start making people aware of his desire for creating and selectively enforcing anti-gay laws.

      Buying his books directly helps him push that agenda.
      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    5. Re:Card by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      Ah--missed the bit about laws regulating sexual behaviour (I only skimmed the document--LDS stuff is bloody boring). Anyone who wants to regulate sex is a twit: the law should punish victimisers (e.g. rapists, thieves, murderers and defrauders) and no-one else.

  32. small corrections by xlurker · · Score: 1
    you answered to a previous poster that you wouldn't mind corrections, so here goes

    1. I'd guess you're either german or french since in these languages it's not uncommon to say "c'est génial" or "das ist genial" which literally would be translated to "that's ingenius". A fitting translation would be "that's cool".

    2. "I readed" should simply be "I read" pronounced "red".

    3. "in the 70's decade" , no "decade", just "the 70s"

    enough of being the local grammer nazi! (especially since I always make mistakes myself...)

    Your point concerning Asimov is interesting. I have only read the Foundation Trilogy, so I don't know what the sequels are like. Too bad Asimov didn't take Pohls offer. I suppose the sequels were written by other authors (than Asimov). Did he decide on them or the publishers?

    --
    ______________________________________________
    sigamajig...
    1. Re:small corrections by Zangief · · Score: 1

      Those irregular verbs...

      The sequels were written by Asimov himself, in the 80's. Of course, he had changed a lot, and had become a better writter, but he was not the same Asimov. The sequels are radically different. They are novels, not shorts stories, and they are centered on two characters, instead of being historical.

      He wrote four foundation books:

      The sequels. Those happen around the year 500 of the foundational era. They are the end of the series, and the end of the whole asimov universe.
      -Foundation's Edge, which is a lot like Star Trek.
      -Foundation and Earth, which is like a bad Star Trek episode.

      The prequels. Those center on Hari Seldon, which is interesting, but there are ties to other books that made him less important. They are better than the sequels, but, still weaker than the trilogy:
      -Prelude to Foundation, which is an adventure book, dealing with Seldon arrival to Trantor.
      -Forward the Foundation, that tells the rest of Seldon's life.

      Forward the Foundation is actually good, as Seldon mirrors Asimov life. He wrote it as he was nearing his death, so it is somewhat sad. I actually recommend this one, since, you almost need no info from the previous book or the sequels.

      The new books add a lot of inconsistenve and new contradictions to the series, which is also bad.

      After Asimov's death, his wife gave permission to three writers, Greg Bear, David Brin and (first name) Benford. Those continued from Forward Foundation, and added a lot of crazy stuff to the series. Those are not good books at all.

      I hope that helped.

  33. Children of God by Tony · · Score: 1

    The sequel is also excellent: Children of God. It follows the same doubting protagonist, but introduces a more philosophic and hopeful theology.

    Both books together are truly great works of literary SF.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  34. Fred Pohl forever by GomezAdams · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I just re-read a collection of shorts stories edited by Pohl who was one of the greatest SF editors of the early years.

    And BTW, Franz Schubert wrote "Ave Maria" for his supper. He was invited to eat with a wealthy patron and then told he had to produce a piece of work before he could sit down. Writers and artists work for money. Hard to pay the bills with sunshine.

    --
    Too lazy to create a sig...
    1. Re:Fred Pohl forever by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      They need to make movies out of this stuff.

  35. But the song also says: by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    Every girl in Constantinople
    Is in Istanbul, not Constantinople.
    So if you're for days in Constantinople
    Show me how to get to Istanbul!

    Clearly the Stan is a boy, and is, therefore, in Constantinople.

    1. Re:But the song also says: by VendingMenace · · Score: 1

      what the hell are you talking about?

      Now i understand that maybe you thought you heard this, but for the love of all that is good and holy please, PLEASE think about what you write before you post it. The lyrics that you posted make no sense at all. The actual lyrics follow :)

      Every gal in Constantinople
      Lives in Istanbul, not Constantinople
      So if you've a date in Constantinople
      She'll be waiting in Istanbul

      i don't mean to be too hash. I have mistaken lyrics many a time myself. However, if you write something out and it doesn't make sense, you should really check into it.

  36. What was the name of that collection? by mark99 · · Score: 1

    Sounds good. I would like to read it.

    1. Re:What was the name of that collection? by Suchetha · · Score: 1

      The book is called Far Horizons
      http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/185723942 3/qid=1102823670/sr=1-13/ref=sr_1_0_13/026-7694002 -5674868

      i got it in a budget bookstore in the UK for UKP1. unfortunately the cover says its not available in the US

      good luck finding it, but its worth the read

      to the ac in the brother post: you're tight, when i posted i hadn't read the whole thing. my bad

      Suchetha

      --

      learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
      or one out of three ain't bad