Slashdot Mirror


'Something' Cleaning Mars Rover

bluenirve writes "'Something' has been cleaning the solar panels of the Mars rover Opportunity. "NASA's Mars rover Opportunity seems to have stumbled into something akin to a carwash that has left its solar panels much cleaner than those of its twin rover, Spirit. A Martian carwash would account for a series of unexpected boosts in the electrical power produced by Opportunity's solar panels.""

37 of 355 comments (clear)

  1. They looked for the dirt by Adam9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    When NASA scientists had the rover examine its solar panels for dirt, it replied, "Nothing for you to see here. Please move along."

  2. Yesterday's News. by Vaevictis666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dupe from Yesterday

    1. Re: Yesterday's News. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


      > Dupe from Yesterday

      Yeah, but the panels are still being cleaned today!

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re: Yesterday's News. by elmegil · · Score: 5, Funny

      Something is cleaning the editor's memory of the past. Too bad it doesn't work more quickly.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  3. Even Mars has homeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't it clear that homeless Martians have newspapers to clean the panels too?

  4. That Martian is going to get pissed.... by Neologic · · Score: 5, Funny

    That Martian is going to get pissed when the probe doesn't give him a tip.

    --

    "I hate quotations. Tell me what you know." -Ralph Waldo Emerson

    1. Re:That Martian is going to get pissed.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Probe."
      "Tip."

      There's a joke in there somewhere...

  5. Just goes to show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Women are from Mars.

  6. Nitrogen by panxerox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've always wondered why they never put a little bottlie of compressed nitrogen on the rover with nozzels pointed at the panels. Press a switch on earth and pffftt! dust be gone!

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
    1. Re:Nitrogen by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps it's because an exploding bottle of nitrogen would probably total the probe. Always consider what failure of the doo-dad would do to the overall mission before including the doo-dad. Dirty solar panels are one thing, shredded panels is another.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    2. Re:Nitrogen by WhiteBandit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hmm, I fubar'd my link. Anyway, my post SHOULD have said:

      Or maybe not:


      Steve Squyres, the Mars rovers principal investigator, said the rovers' designers deemed the additional weight of adding wipers or blowers to the solar panels was not worthwhile. Instead they increased the size of the panels to maximize the power input.


  7. Bum Martian window washer? by signingis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is NASA going to have a stinky, unwashed, unshaven martian approach the camera and ask for change?

    --

    I prefer a void in conversation to a vacuous one.
  8. I don't know why by eclectro · · Score: 3, Interesting


    they just didn't put a windshield wiper with a mister on the rovers.

    Then there would be water on Mars!

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  9. Beagle 2 by piquadratCH · · Score: 3, Funny

    So THAT's what Beagle 2 is doing all the time up there...

  10. Re:Wind maybe? by Control+Group · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The reason wind isn't the obvious answer it seems like is that the Martian atmosphere is so thin. I remember seeing (on Discovery HD, IIRC) a wind tunnel simulation NASA was doing to study dust devils on Mars. They set up the chamber at Martian atmospheric pressure, then cranked up a fan to blow some insanely high wind speed. The fine dust on the floor didn't even budge; there just wasn't enough air to make anything happen.

    The only way they were able to replicate the observed dust devil effects was to toss larger pebbles into the chamber, kicking the dust up into the wind.

    Anyway, the point is that wind is still the most probable cause, but it's not quite the obvious slam-dunk that it superficially seems.

    --

    Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
  11. would wind work by grahamsz · · Score: 3, Informative

    We had gusts up to 98mph earlier this week and my car looks as dirty as ever

  12. Design by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 5, Interesting

    NASA engineers decided not to put wipers on the solar panels, because it would have been too much trouble / added too much weight. I guess they're pretty happy with their decision now, with the 'unexpected' cleaning events...

  13. Re:hmmm... by Moridineas · · Score: 3, Informative

    Jeez, RTFA :-p That's exactly what they suggest.

  14. I told them.... by Audacious · · Score: 4, Funny

    I told those peskey custodians to NOT clean the rover while it was on the set!

    --
    Someone put a black hole in my pocket and now I'm broke. :-)
  15. Re:hmmm... by cmowire · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, it's more the case that the cost, primarily in weight, of adding the required fan, wiper, or other cleaning system outweighs the value added with more scientific instruments. And given that the panels are relatively fragile (remember, every gram of mass has a dollar amount attatched to it) you'd need to be awfully careful -- wipers are out.

    Also, it's something else that can fail. Sure, it sounds like a good idea, but if you ruin the solar panels halfway into the base mission because it doesn't work, people start looking really dumb. Or if the shape of grains of martian soil is not quite the same as earth soil and it ends up not working. Or there's something else that might fail, you leave a backup for it out, and then look really stupid when that part fails and you've still got plenty of solar energy.

    The biggest problem, of course, is that the designers of the probe are hamstrung by rather unreasonable launch costs that are showing little signs of getting better and are prevented by vast armies of rather stupid anti-nuclear-power whackos from using a 5 year power source. Oh yeah, and most of the NASA budget is reserved for a space shuttle that is far too expensive and has not been able to be retired and replaced due to a variety of issues.

    But, in general, it's much better to get a different assortment of tools on a different probe in a completely different location every 2 years, with a chance to have design improvements, instead of having two massive probes that last for 5 years and can only be launched every 10 years.

  16. It happened to me too by Magickcat · · Score: 4, Funny

    A similar phenomena used to occur in my room as a teenager. Perhaps the two occurances are somehow connected.

    --

    Si tacuisses philosophus mansisses. If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher.

    1. Re:It happened to me too by agent+dero · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sure the Mars Lander's mom came in, yelled at him for moving so slowly, and sleeping most of the day, then cleaned his solar panels, and left in a huff....

      Brilliant!

      --
      Error 407 - No creative sig found
  17. dust devils? by jokach · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The article states:
    And the researchers suspect the shape of the crater may encourage the development of dust devils or other wind patterns that could help scrub the panels.

    The tornado like winds that can be caused by dust devils is something that was discussed by NASA back in April and surely seems like the real answer:

    http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/dust_devils_ 040420.html

    I'm not sure why they think its such a mystery now ...

  18. Re:hmmm... by thoughtcriminal87 · · Score: 3, Funny

    wait, there's an article?

  19. Re:hmmm... by Jester99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You would think they would have built a wiper to sweap the dust off, or maybe some high pressure air hose or fan. Or thy could have added an ability to vibrate the dust off.

    I got to ask a NASA engineer about this once in person.

    He said they considered it. But then you have to remember that each of these things has moving parts, which are prone to getting dust in them and clogging, or breaking, or whatever. If you wanted, you could also have multiple layers of solar panels and when one got too dusty, it could "molt" and then the fresh panel would be exposed. They've thought of each of these things.

    The problem is that they all add complexity and weight. When you're trying to hurtle something at a planet and have it touch down for landing, making the damn thing bulkier doesn't exactly add to reliability.

    If your robot vibrates, then that could loosen screws and the whole thing could rattle itself into a pile of scrap metal.

    If your robot blows itself off with an air hose, then you need to have a filter system so you know you're not blowing dusty air on it. But filters get clogged, so eventually the hose system would stop working, and the panels would get dusty.

    If your robot molts panels, you then need to add extra motors to lift off a given layer. But these are heavy, and could break. Heavier = more power draw to move around. So if the motors malfunctioned, it wouldn't have gone as far as it would've if it only had a single layer of panels -- meaning you'd get less exploring done.

    Wiper motors ... same problem.

    Nothing political about it.

  20. Anyone considered this... by jbwolfe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Static charge?

    --
    Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?
  21. Re:hmmm... by cot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What about several layers of thin clear plastic that's tensioned?

    You have each layer held down with tabs,and release them one by one as the cells accumulate dust. The released plastic curls up at one end of the cells when released.

    You could probably do this at least several times.

    --

  22. watt-hours per day by aberson · · Score: 3, Informative

    seems a little redundant

    power * time / time = power

    900 Watts * hours / day * (1 day / 24 hours) = 37.5 Watts.

    Why not just say that to start?

  23. Re:hmmm... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Martian gravity is lower than Earth's, and dust should be lighter and hence easier to blow off. Or shake off - couldn't NASA have built in some way to have the vehicle shake itself like a dog? Or at least jerk forward, stop, jerk backwards. At which point the Martians would groan and wait for the probe to start spouting rap lyrics.

  24. That contradicts why it got dusty in the 1st place by cheekyboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dude, if the air pressure is TOO LOW to blow the dust around, then how DID THE DAMN DUST get ONTO THE panels in the first PLACE!?!?!?!

    You cant say fact A)
    "The wind is not enough to blow the dust off the panels"

    and yet say B)
    "The panels got dusty because of wind blow dust around the planet"

    So which is it?

    But we do know mars gets dusty as wild storms do happen, but we havent seen that in any camera footage this year.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  25. Ultrasonic cleaning by EvilMidnightBomber · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had almost exactly the same problem when prototyping my robot lawn mower. (crappy pic in profile) The first rev. used optical interrupters to sense a cut grass edge, and these would rapidly become unusable due to dust. I ran through the feasibility of using such an onboard(liqufied) gas tank, but the ratio of functionality to weight is king in any mobile (and especially spaceborne) app and this falls short on that mark (beside being non-renewable). Wipers (and worse yet the geared motor to drive them) are similarly bulky, and unless you're using diamond coated optics,(no water here to lubricate things) wiping the dust eventually produces hazing due to microscratches. The solution I found was to incorporate the equivalent of an ultrasonic parts cleaner. A cheap high-powered motorola peizo tweeter from rat-shack acoustically coupled to the optics support bar and driven at 40khz does an incredible job of knocking off ALL the loose dust, and it's very light weight. The rover could do the same thing by tilting it's panels vertically and then letting rip with the u-sound. About one x-ducer per square meter is all it would take.

  26. second time this happens in one week by alonsoac · · Score: 3, Funny

    what are the odds?

  27. Re:hmmm... by new_here_arent_you · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're new here, aren't you? No, I am.

  28. look at me my parent is a FUCKING GENIUS by loquacious+d · · Score: 3, Funny

    SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP

    For serious, who keeps modding this shit up? Is it really still funny? "I, for one, welcome our Soviet grits hot YOU goatse-Beowulf ????? profit run Linux?" Do I get modded up now, too?

    Fucking idiots.

  29. They keep passing checkpoints by iabervon · · Score: 4, Funny

    As anyone who's played a racing car game in the past twenty years can tell you, when you pass a checkpoint, you get more time. As long as they keep completing new areas, they'll keep getting bonuses. On the other hand, if the Spirit team doesn't get moving, they're going to have to put in another quarter pretty soon.

  30. Re:hmmm... by QuantumFTL · · Score: 4, Informative

    What about several layers of thin clear plastic that's tensioned? You have each layer held down with tabs,and release them one by one as the cells accumulate dust. The released plastic curls up at one end of the cells when released.

    I work for Steve Squyres (the Principle Investigator) and he said that they considered this option as well, and it was prone to failure.

    Looks like they made the right call after all!

    Cheers,
    Justin