Slashdot Mirror


Closer to Human Flight

negativeblue writes "Dropzone.com has (had) a story about the preparation of a man (Jeb Corliss) who prepares to land a wingsuit without a parachute. If you don't know the current abilities of parachutes, now-a-day, you should do your research. Basically airfoils, they can perform close to an airplane wing (high performance turns and lift)."

53 of 290 comments (clear)

  1. jeb is the man by joatmon · · Score: 4, Informative

    if you've ever seen a base jumping video 90% chance it was jeb.

  2. Closer? by SlayerofGods · · Score: 3, Funny

    Damn those fictional airplanes landing all the time without a parachute!

    --

    Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    1. Re:Closer? by the_mind_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No they don't!

      --
      You feel sleepy. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise.
  3. landing by confusion · · Score: 4, Interesting
    They say they're dealing with it, but I really have to wonder how they slow to a resonable speed to land. It seems to me that the "pilot" would be moving at a good clip most of the time. Maybe they have a way to modify the aerodymanics of the wings to slow down + add lots of lift, like flaps on an airplane.
    Cool stuff, though. I won't be trying it.

    Jerry
    http://www.syslog.org/

  4. May I be the first to say... by TrollBridge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...that this guy is more likely going to win a Darwin Award than survive his fall.

    Oh well, I guess something's got to thin the herd...

    --
    There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    1. Re:May I be the first to say... by R2.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I disagree. Darwin awards highlight an obliviousness to the dangers of doing something. This guy seems fully aware of the dangers - he is doing testing and development, so that he will NOT die. He may fail, and hence die, but it won't be for lack of awareness of the danger of what he is doing.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  5. Don't get to close to the sun! by bildungsroman_yorick · · Score: 5, Funny

    I sure hope he hasn't used wax and feathers as the material for his incredible man flying machine.

  6. ...er... by skinfitz · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you don't know the current abilities of parachutes, now-a-day, you should do your research.

    Shouldn't that be wingsuits? I should dearly hope that most people know the abilities of parachutes - they have been a regular plot device in the media for years.

    1. Re:...er... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2
      Umm, rectangular airfoils have been the preferrede type of parachute used since the late 70's (invented in the mid 60's).

      http://www.parachutehistory.com/eng/drs.html

      Like the grandparent said, we've been watching these things in the movies for the last 30 years. The average-joe knows good and well that they are more capable than the round ones most often seen only in World War II movies.

    2. Re:...er... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't think most people know the abilities of modern day parachutes. It has been a few years ago when I left the skydive scene, but at that time huge progress was made using new materials and designs. Modern parachutes might look like ordinary square parachutes, but there are some important differences: so-called 'zero-porosity' fabrics and high-tensile fibers, combined with elliptical shaped canopies result in very efficient parachutes. Some of those can be made *extremely* small (like the Icarus mentioned in the article). Smaller canopies result in higher speeds, but also in higher descent rates. Some of those canopies cannot be landed safely without diving for speed first (using so-called 'hook-turns' or 'front-riser' turns). Seeing somebody land a high-performance parachute is rather spectacular because of the speeds involved. The gap between flying the smallest of those high-performance parachutes (and the technique needed to safely land them) and flying a wing-suite is not that big anymore, and that is what the poster meant to say.

  7. There is a reason by harks · · Score: 4, Interesting

    why most famous BASE jumpers are dead. This is it. Unless he's got some secret technology nobody knows about, this is likely suicide. It's also not good for the public image of skydiving when sombody dies like this.

    1. Re:There is a reason by Golias · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Doing a single tandem jump, because you want to say you did it once, is one thing. Lots of people are curious enough to give it a try.

      I'm talking about people who keep jumping on a regular basis. Sooner or later, 00 is going to come up on that Roulette wheel, and the more times you play, the more likely you will eventually hit it.

      People like to say "you are more likely to die in a car than in a plane", because lots more people die in car crashes than in plane crashes, but if you spent several hours a day flying in planes, the odds of you getting killed in a plane crash become much, much higher. How many touring rock stars died in car crashes in the last 20 years? How many in planes and helicopters?

      Skydiving is a high risk activity. If I learn how to do beam gymnastics and get really good at it, I could probably do a beam routine over a pit of lava once and not die. Gymnasts don't fall off the beam very often. However, if I keep doing it on a regular bases, I should expect to get killed doing it sooner or later. Anybody witnessing my behavior would have to assume that I'm some kind of nut to keep pushing my luck like that.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:There is a reason by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's funny because I was curious and ran the numbers on % of deaths for cars and for sky diving.

      In 2003 there were 42,643 traffic deaths in the US. Using the estimated population numbers from the CIA website that came to roughly .014% chance to die in a car accident.

      Using the latest sky diving death numbers of 25(the last time they reported) and dividing by the only number I could find as to how many jumped (members of the USPA). It came to a .074% chance of death by sky diving. The only problem with the number is that I couldn't find how many people actually did jump last year and had to go off members in the association.

      A better stat would be deaths/divided by number of attempts/trips. I wonder if anyone keeps accurate counts of all sky dives and if someone has any figures around number of car trips taken per year.

      Another thing I wonder about is do the sky dive deaths include base jumping? IMHO, I would agree with you about base jumping being very stupid to do on a regular basis. An acquaintance of mine died doing a base jump when a gust of wind pushed her back into the mountain. She was a pro sky diver(doing competitions and stuff) so it was more bad luck than anything that got her. Knowing what happened to her, I still think people should try a tandem jump at least once in their life. It is truly an amazing experience.

    3. Re:There is a reason by pi_rules · · Score: 3, Informative

      The actual numbers, IIRC, are 1 in 100,000 jumps are fatal. The VAST majority of these actually operator error while nearing the ground on high performance canopies. For instance taking a steep turn using your risers when you're too low and smacking the ground at 60-70mph.

      Malfs on your main parachute are 1 in 1000 from what I understood. Those are packed up in 5-10 minutes in a rather hurried fashion. Your reserve is carefully packed painstakinly by a FAA certified rigger who spends 30-45 minutes working on it VERY carefully. The reserve is also repacked every 120 days by FAA regulations.

      I don't know the stats, but a double malfunction is a VERY rare occurance. It's more than likely "operator error" that causes the death of a skydiver.

  8. One nasty gust and he's history. by Synapsys · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm no expert in aerodynamics or atmospheric dynamics, but don't you take a huge risk with that (apart from the obvious things) with the help of a nasty gust, updraft or the like, an un recoverable spin could occur.... The problem with having a set of wings and no engine is once you our out of control, recovery won't be easy.

  9. Batman!!! by nbharatvarma · · Score: 4, Funny

    So we are gonna have Batman soon.. Position of Robin is probably available. Any takers ?

    --
    ... and I shall strike upon thee with great vegeance, furious anger and a slightly positive karma.
    1. Re:Batman!!! by mpathetiq · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm a top, not a bottom*... you can have Robin's position.




      *not gay.

    2. Re:Batman!!! by seweso · · Score: 2, Funny

      The position of Batman will soon be available too!

  10. suggestion by beaverfever · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm sure these guys know what they're doing and are figuring out the equations, but here's a suggestion I would like to make: try landing in the suit near the edge of a big cliff, like perhaps near the Grand Canyon, for example. If Jeb gets very low and doesn't like his chances, he could try his damndest to pull up and clear the cliff edge, giving him another chance to release his parachute.

    On the other hand, if he did pass the point of no return and went for the landing and overshot a bit, that might be a problem. hmmm.

    Water - try landing on water first. Or a mattress - king-size, preferably.

    1. Re:suggestion by pi_rules · · Score: 2, Informative

      a^2 + b^2 = c^2 -- works with velocity too!

      70^2 + 30^2 = 5800.

      Square root of 5800? 76.1mph. Pretty sure that's about how fast you're going after 700 feet. Just from memory, I've forgotten a lot of physics. Now, if you think a 700 foot drop into water is survivable.. well... at that point I don't think it matters much if it's concrete or water.

      Besdies, have you SEEN one of these wingsuits? Go to birdman.com, they're the market leader. You are NOT going to want to swim in this thing. Especially not with a rig on your back.

      Here, check this: http://justinbuist.org/images/120kmh_at_3meters.mo v

      That guy is just a few feet from being able to land the thing on that slope, IMHO. However, he posesses some modicum of common sense it seems.

      This has almost been done before (see the video). All that's needed is:
      a) A slightly slower speed helps (slightly different suit than the Birdman stuff).
      b) Some practice to perfect your flaring technique.
      c) Somebody bat-shit crazy enough to think this up.
      d) Somebody insanely bat-shit crazy to try it.

      After watching a video I found online, I think this guy qualifies for friggen nuts: http://media.hugi.is/hahradi/fyndnar/jeb_2003big.w mv

      Makes my butt pucker just to WATCH that.

  11. Is it really flight? by bildungsroman_yorick · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's more of a very impressive controlled fall. Can the wing suits be used in conjunction with parachutes so as to have a back up in case of a failed opening?

  12. Reminds me of Gomez Addams... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...from the Addams Family. Every time he did a jump, he used a smaller parachute. By his theory, eventually he would not need any paracute at all.

    And of course, he was correct. Eventually, he would have no need for a paracute...

  13. Human flight? by Anubis333 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Human flight? don't you mean slowed and directed human falling? It's not like he can leave the ground as soon as he starts flapping his wing suit.

    There are a few people that have fallen out of commercial airliners and survived. They didn't have wing suits and fell thousands and thousands of feet.

  14. That's not flying... by Beolach · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's falling... with STYLE!

    Way cool... nice photos in TFA.

    --
    Join moola.com, play games to earn money.
  15. "no one has..survived a landing without a chute" by CdBee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not strictly true - the following is one of several true stories of WW2 bomber crew jumping without chutes and surviving.. in this case because he landed on a glass-roofed railwsy station and was slowed by successive levels of shattering glass

    Man Survived 22,000-Foot Fall Out of Bomber

    Also:
    "The greatest fall without "riding" a piece of wreckage goes to Russian Lt. I.M. Chisov, who bailed out of his Ilyushin 4 bomber at 22,000 feet in January 1942, after being attacked by German fighters. His plan was to free-fall to 1,000 feet before opening his parachute, thus limiting his exposure to enemy fire while still in the air. Unfortunately he lost consciousness on the way down, and never opened his parachute. Like Vulovic, he landed in snow and survived, returning to duty three months later". - link

    There was also a British gunner from a Lancaster bomber who fell from his aircraft during an attack and was saved by fir trees and deep snow.

    That said, I still think this guy's a loon. Nobody ever volunteered to jump without a parachute before.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  16. lol by moro_666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    a madman on fire imagining that he can fly like batman ???
    c00l .....

    --

    I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
  17. surviving falls by jeif1k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    as no one has ever survived a landing attempt without a parachute.

    I don't know whether people have survived "attempts", but you can certainly survive falls from airplanes without a parachute: hitting brushes, trees, water, or snow can break your fall sufficiently so that you don't die. Theoretically, even hitting a solid, hard surface is survivable if you break the fall correctly (but I don't know of any actual cases).

    1. Re:surviving falls by zeux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A couple of them survived a landing attempt without a parachute:
      - Chissov from russia (1942) fell from 6705 meters (20000 feets) on snow, he was wounded but survived.
      - Nicolas Stephen Alkemade (1944) survived a fall from 5490 meters (16500 feets). He landed on a tree and a pile of snow and survived.

      I only have a document in French though:
      Click here.

    2. Re:surviving falls by pclminion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Theoretically, even hitting a solid, hard surface is survivable if you break the fall correctly

      Probably not. The "best" way I can imagine landing would be to land in a standing position, with your knees locked. You are hoping that the impact energy will be absorbed in your lower body instead of your internal organs, spine, and brain.

      Upon landing, the bones in your legs would shatter, the flesh of your legs would be pulverized, and your lower body would basically explode like a blood-filled water balloon. Even if this all happened correctly, there is still the matter of decelerating your upper body.

      The equation we need here is v^2=2ax. We are solving for a. Suppose v is 120 mph, and x is three feet (the typical length of a person's legs). The acceleration would be about 1600 m/s^2: 163 G's. This would turn your brain to mush.

      Now, some people theorize that instead of just impacting into the ground, you could land at an angle and "roll" in order to transfer the kinetic energy into a harmless direction. Except that if you think about this physically, it's even worse than just impacting directly into the ground. Now, instead of removing your momentum of fall, you have to redirect it to a perpendicular direction. This takes 40% more force than simply stopping the motion, and would probably result in your entire body exploding like a water balloon, not just your legs.

      Without something to substantially cushion the fall, I do not believe it is possible for a human to survive an impact on a hard surface at terminal velocity.

  18. Downer by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

    Be a real downer if it doesn't work. He'll probably be in a big depression.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  19. Speed is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The trick I think is to develop enough forward speed. More forward speed develops more lift. In a regular plane, you do something called a flare as you land. As you get close to the touchdown point, you steer up (technically, you change your angle of attack). This burns off forward speed and creates lift. This guy has a lot more freedom about his angle of attack. (Him landing on his feet would be the equivalent of a plane landing on its tail.) I think it could work but, of course, I'm not going to try it. My guess is that he will still have a lot of forward velocity when he has essentially no lift left.

    The more I think about it, the more I think I agree with the parent.

    1. Re:Speed is good by luguvalium2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Isn't a flare essentially a stall that is really close to the ground? If you watch birds land they flare and then pop their feet out of the tuck position so that they land on their feet. My guess is that with practice, a human can do the same. It's surviving the practice thats the tricky part.

    2. Re:Speed is good by delcielo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Most flares result in touchdown before a stall occurs, though at least in light planes a stalled landing is considered a good one. It requires keeping the airplane inches above the ground while the Angle of Attack increases to the stall point and drops the airplane gently on the runway.

      The term "Angle of Attack" is defined as the angle between the chord line of the wing (a line drawn from the leading edge to the trailing edge) and the relative wind, which is essentially your direction of travel through the air. So for instance, during the landing flare the wing's chord line is pointed up with the rest of the plane but the airplane continues a slight descent, making the angle between the two very large compared to cruise flight where they're both pointed more toward what land-lubbers would call level.

      The trick is that as the Angle of Attack increases so does lift... to a point. Every airfoil has a critical angle of attack beyond which airflow separates, lift is destroyed, and the airfoil ceases to work aerodynamically and becomes simply an object sticking out into the wind.

      I would imagine that this guy will have to build a great deal of forward speed which will give him a flatter trajectory and therefore a lower angle of attack. He'll then need to raise his angle of attack at the right moment and flare without exceeding that critical angle, which may or may not be anything the engineers who built the suit ever determined. He definety does not want to stall the wingsuit. His life depends on its lift.

      I know this guy is doing a lot of testing using gps data, etc. to figure all of this out; but it is exceedingly risky.

      I predict this will end bad, though I really hope I'm wrong.

      --
      Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
    3. Re:Speed is good by mattlyle · · Score: 2, Informative

      yes, that's correct: a flare is just stalling.

      under a normal parachute we flare every time we go to land... if you've ever seen a skydiver land, as they touch down you will see them pull down on two handles (called toggle)... these are connected to the rear of the canopy, which distorts the trailing corners of the canopy to create more lift... so you're converting forward speed into lift.

    4. Re:Speed is good by i.r.id10t · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought the tricky part was throwing yourself at the ground and missing....

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    5. Re:Speed is good by spagetti_code · · Score: 2, Informative
      You are right. And a little more detail is that he has probably got a low lift wing. Wing lift is proportional to velocity^2 * wing area * air density * lift-coefficient (basically aerofoil shape and angle of attack - AoA).

      He's got a very small wing area so to achieve lift he needs speed, a high-lift wing shape and AoA.

      He will likely have a high stall speed. (Note: you stall at an AoA, not a speed. But for a given configuration - weight, wing shape, bank angle, CoG, environment - the stall speed is constant.)

      So he will be zooming along just above the ground at a high speed waiting for his speed to wash off - which it will, quite quickly because high-lift wingshapes are either very wide (large area, low cross-sectional thickness, low drag = glider) or very thick (like a wing with slats and flaps extended = high lift, high drag). Unfortunately he will need to increase his angle of attack to maintain lift, and he will still be going very fast when he 'stalls' onto the ground.

      An alternative that comes to mind is the "zoom" - a sudden pull up that gains a few feet in a plane but also removes airspeed very quickly. If he times a zoom just right he might be able to turn himself into a airbrake without gaining too much height. Wouldn't want to do it myself.

      Another is to live with the high speed and have wheels on the front of the suit. If you have landed a hang glider with wheels you will know what I mean - you come zooming in to touch down on wheels on the end of the bar you hold. You are lying inches from the ground as you roll.

      Lastly, a comment on wing shape. He will want a very high lift from a small area, which means thick and high AoA. A good (for him) feature of those wings is high drag, so he will have the ability to remove high airspeed from freefall quickly. A bad feature is a tendency to stall if airspeed is not tightly controlled. I've just got this image of what a spin would look like...

  20. article text by hyfe · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you don't know the current abilities of parachutes, now-a-day, you should do your research.

    Why? I couldn't care less about the abillties of current parachutes.

    --
    "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
  21. Re:So how'd he get down? by Alioth · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you've ever seen a skydiver's jump ship (the plane that takes them up) you'll realise that there's no way you'd ever describe it as "perfectly functioning". The old joke is they make the jump ship scary enough that the skydivers would rather jump out than land with it, but not so scary that the pilot wants to do the same.

    The other joke is:
    "What's the difference between skydiving and golf?
    In one you go "Whack! Uh oh!" and in the other you go "Uh oh! Whack!"

  22. Message from another aviation pioneer. by JJ · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't Fly!! Don't Fly!!

    You'll get too close to the sun and your wings will melt !!
    -- Icarus

    --
    So long and thanks for all the fish . . . !!!
  23. Why is it so hard to beleive? by true_majik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You guys are very quick at pointing out how ridiculous this idea sounds. Have you guys seen fotage of the wingsuit in use? It's pretty impressive. Why is it totally impossible to take it a step further? Don't you think that before the wingsuit, people were ridiculing it? And the parachute too? And the airplane? I'm not saying it's a sure thing, but it may very well be possible to land safely with a wingsuit.

  24. Best Quote by Bob(TM) · · Score: 2, Funny

    Best quote from the article:

    "If Jeb lands the wing-suit without a parachute and survives--he is going to be my hero," added Cani.

    Between the lines:

    And, if he doesn't survive - he'll be dead. Hero/dead ... mutually exclusive.

    --

    The little guy just ain't getting it, is he?
  25. This flight has been predicted long ago by lxs · · Score: 3, Funny

    I believe that Douglas Adams actually channeled this guy's thoughts during the attempt:

    And wow! Hey! What's this thing coming towards me very fast? Very very fast. So big and flat and round, it needs a big wide sounding word like... ow... ound... round... ground! That's it! That's a good name - ground! I wonder if it will be friends with me.

  26. Re:"no one has..survived a landing without a chute by AtlanticCarbon · · Score: 2

    Can someone explain to me how the hell these people survived? I always thought you could even hit water and still be crushed at such heights. (On the other hand it's nice to know you pass out before hitting the ground).

  27. Another DNA tidbit on flying... by speedphreak · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy has this to say on the subject of flying:

    "There is an art, it says, or rather, a knack to flying.

    The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.

    Pick a nice day, it suggests, and try it.

    The first part is easy.

    All it requires is simply the ability to throw yourself forward with all your weight, and willingness not to mind that it's going to hurt.

    That is, it's going to hurt if you fail to miss the ground.

    Most people fail to miss the ground, and if they are really trying properly, the likelihood is that they will fail to miss it fairly hard.

    Clearly, it is this second part, the missing, which presents the difficulties.

    One problem is that you have to miss the ground accidentally. It's no good deliberately intending to miss the ground because you won't. You have to have your attention suddenly distracted by something else when you're halfway there, so that you are no longer thinking about falling, or about the ground, or about how much it's going to hurt if you fail to miss it.

    It is notoriously difficult to prise your attention away from these three things during the split second you have at your disposal. Hence most people's failure, and their eventual disillusionment with this exhilarating and spectacular sport.

    If, however, you are lucky enough to have your attention momentarily distracted at the crucial moment by, say, a gorgeous pair of legs (tentacles, pseudopodia, according to phyllum and/or personal inclination) or a bomb going off in your vicinity, or by suddenly spotting an extremely rare species of beetle crawling along a nearby twig, then in your astonishment you will miss the ground completely and remain bobbing just a few inches above it in what might seem to be a slightly foolish manner.

    This is a moment for superb and delicate concentration.

    Bob and float, float and bob.

    Ignore all considerations of your own weight and simply let yourself waft higher.

    Do not listen to what anybody says to you at this point because they are unlikely to say anything helpful.

    They are most likely to say something along the lines of, 'Good God, you can't possibly be flying!'

    It is vitally important not to believe them or they will suddenly be right.

    Waft higher and higher.

    Try a few swoops, gentle ones at first, then drift above the treetops breathing regularly.

    DO NOT WAVE AT ANYBODY.

    When you have done this a few times you will find the moment of distraction rapidly becomes easier and easier to achieve.

    You will then learn all sorts of things about how to control your flight, your speed, your manoeuvrability, and the trick usually lies in not thinking too hard about whatever you want to do, but just allowing it to happen as if it was going to anyway.

    You will also learn about how to land properly, which is something you will almost certainly cock up, and cock up badly, on your first attempt.

    There are private flying clubs you can join which help you achieve the all-important moment of distraction. They hire people with surprising bodies or opinions to leap out from behind bushes and exhibit and/or explain them at the critical moments. Few genuine hitch-hikers will be able to afford to join these clubs, but some may be able to get temporary employment at them."

    -- Douglas Adams, 'The Hitch-Hikers Guide To The Galaxy'

  28. Re:"no one has..survived a landing without a chute by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Nobody ever volunteered to jump without a parachute before.
    That's not true, either.
    I remember seeing a video once of a Hollywood stuntman who jumped out of an airplane without a parachute or "flying suit", and landed on an airbag (not the car kind; the kind that Hollywood stuntmen use for falling-from-a-great-height stunts).

    I think that there also have been several cases where a stuntman jumped out of an airplane without a parachute, another stuntman handed him a parachute in mid-air, and the first stuntman put it on and deployed it before reaching the ground.
    (One James Bond movie (with Roger Moore as Bond) started with Bond fighting in mid-air with a bad guy and taking his parachute.
    I think that this was one of those cases.)
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  29. Re:"no one has..survived a landing without a chute by CdBee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Lieutenant Chisov survived mainly through being unconscious - he landed on the side of an extremely steep ravine filled with snow several feet deep and slid through the snow all the way to the bottom, where he awoke with serious bruises, a few fractures and presumably a sense of bewilderment. The British gunner survived in near-identical circumstances but was totally unhurt. The Germans refused to believe his story....

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  30. Re:"no one has..survived a landing without a chute by Matts · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It all comes down to how much you can move an object. When you hit water the object has to move sideways to get out of your way. This is much harder to achieve than moving something down (i.e. by breaking glass) plus the glass will weigh a hell of a lot less than a few hundred meters of water going straight down, so the opposing force is a lot less.

    By breaking several layers of glass one by one you slow the body down with a succession of small forces rather than one big one.

    --

    Matt. Want XML + Apache + Stylesheets? Get AxKit.
  31. Re:"no one has..survived a landing without a chute by tekunokurato · · Score: 2, Funny

    I remember reading about all those people in my Second-Edition Dungeon Master's Guide! Wow, what a nerd I am!

  32. flybirdman.com by kevin922 · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.flybirdman.com/ all you wanted to know about wingsuit flight..

  33. Toy Story? by System.out.println() · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's not flying... that's falling with style.

  34. Re:"no one has..survived a landing without a chute by R2.0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A friend of mine who was in the military (briefly) told me about "earth angels": soldiers who had survived their chute not opening. Supposedly, they are transferred out of their unit rapidly, not because they don't want to go back up, but their presence creeps out the rest of their unit.

    Anyone care to confirm?

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  35. impressive by moterizer · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those who wonder what a wingsuit looks like in action, check out some of the videos on this page. I particularly enjoyed the one called "BirdMan on Monte Brento" which links to this other page.

    My other sig is funnier.

  36. Land a Snowboard... by ayjay29 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I heard about a French guy once, who had done the math, and worked out that free-falling with a snowboard is pretty close to the speed and direction of the guys hopping off the 80m ski jumps.

    He had a plan to jump from a helicopter, and land on a steep powder field in the Alps somewhere. I think around the time (1994), the record for the highest survived drop on skiis or a board was around 270 feet.

    Never heard if he pulled it off or not.

    (I heard all this over a few beers in a bar in Chamonix, so I've no idea if theres any truth behind it.)

    One thing i think is cool though, is that the speed skiing record is about 75 mph faster than a free-fall sky diver.

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.