Slashdot Mirror


DURL, a Search Tool for del.icio.us

Roland Piquepaille writes "I've been a strong advocate of the social bookmarking service named del.icio.us since it started (check here for an example). And almost every single day, a new tool appears and enhances the use of this service. This new one, DURL, written by Robin Millette, lets you type an URL and see if some other people already "delicious'ed it." And this is very efficient because it leads you to people who not only bookmarked the URL, but also assigned to it some pertinent keywords or tags, giving you new and fresh ideas. Services like Bloglines or Technorati among others certainly can return hundreds of links, so they are good for 'popularity contests.' But for building social communities and introducing you to sources you wouldn't have thought of, they don't compare to del.icio.us. This overview contains more comments, examples and screenshots."

36 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot: Is there a connection?

    I think most of you are aware of the controversy surrounding regular Slashdot article submitter Roland Piquepaille. For those of you who don't know, please allow me to bring forth all the facts. Roland Piquepaille has an online journal (I refuse to use the word "blog") located at www.primidi.com [primidi.com]. It is titled "Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends". It consists almost entirely of content, both text and pictures, taken from reputable news websites and online technical journals. He does give credit to the other websites, but it wasn't always so. Only after many complaints were raised by the Slashdot readership did he start giving credit where credit was due. However, this is not what the controversy is about.

    Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends serves online advertisements through a service called Blogads, located at www.blogads.com. Blogads is not your traditional online advertiser; rather than base payments on click-throughs, Blogads pays a flat fee based on the level of traffic your online journal generates. This way Blogads can guarantee that an advertisement on a particular online journal will reach a particular number of users. So advertisements on high traffic online journals are appropriately more expensive to buy, but the advertisement is guaranteed to be seen by a large amount of people. This, in turn, encourages people like Roland Piquepaille to try their best to increase traffic to their journals in order to increase the going rates for advertisements on their web pages. But advertisers do have some flexibility. Blogads serves two classes of advertisements. The premium ad space that is seen at the top of the web page by all viewers is reserved for "Special Advertisers"; it holds only one advertisement. The secondary ad space is located near the bottom half of the page, so that the user must scroll down the window to see it. This space can contain up to four advertisements and is reserved for regular advertisers, or just "Advertisers". Visit Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends (www.primidi.com [primidi.com]) to see it for yourself.

    Before we talk about money, let's talk about the service that Roland Piquepaille provides in his journal. He goes out and looks for interesting articles about new and emerging technologies. He provides a very brief overview of the articles, then copies a few choice paragraphs and the occasional picture from each article and puts them up on his web page. Finally, he adds a minimal amount of original content between the copied-and-pasted text in an effort to make the journal entry coherent and appear to add value to the original articles. Nothing more, nothing less.

    Now let's talk about money. Visit http://www.blogads.com/order_html?adstrip_category =tech&politics= [blogads.com] to check the following facts for yourself. As of today, December XX 2004, the going rate for the premium advertisement space on Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends is $375 for one month. One of the four standard advertisements costs $150 for one month. So, the maximum advertising space brings in $375 x 1 + $150 x 4 = $975 for one month. Obviously not all $975 will go directly to Roland Piquepaille, as Blogads gets a portion of that as a service fee, but he will receive the majority of it. According to the FAQ [blogads.com], Blogads takes 20%. So Roland Piquepaille gets 80% of $975, a maximum of $780 each month. www.primidi.com is hosted by clara.net (look it up at http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/whois/index. jhtml [networksolutions.com] [networksolutions.com]). Browsing clara.net's hosting solutions, the most expensive hosting service is their Clarahost Advanced (http://www.uk.clara.net/clarahost/advanced.php [clara.net]) priced at £69.99 GBP. This is roughly, at the time of this writing, $130 USD. Assuming Roland Piquepaille pays for the Clarahost Advanced hosting service, he is out $130 leaving him with a maximum net profit of $650 each mont

    1. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by nizo · · Score: 3, Funny
      Roland Piquepaille has an online journal (I refuse to use the word "blog") located at www.primidi.com [primidi.com]. It is titled "Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends". It consists almost entirely of content, both text and pictures, taken from reputable news websites and online technical journals.

      Sweet I will have to go check out this website, thanks for the link! Oh wait maybe I should read the rest of your post first....

    2. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by JaffaKREE · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think part of the problem is also that your submitted stories generally suck and stick out as "one of those slashdot Story-Ads". Why the secrecy anyway ? Does /. make money off your submissions or not ? We're not opposed to it, we're just opposed to all the weird shadiness...

    3. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by electrichamster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, aggregate the content in a slashdot article and link to the original sources instead of your profiting weblog.

      No hosting costs for you, and you perform the same job as everyone else that submits a slashdot article.

    4. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are a prime example of someone who consumes information and never produce any

      So what did you ever produce, Roland? Outside of gratuitously long quotes from original sources and adding your own snippet like "This is interesting" or "The technology has gone long ways"? What's your addition to the value chain that you're so intrigued with? If we disconnect the Internet line at your house, would you be capable of producing anything first-hand, using just word processor and your own brain?

    5. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by slungsolow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Try it yourself some day, you might realize it takes time and money to produce content that many people seem to enjoy.

      I am sure the people who originally wrote the articles you copy and pasted would say something similar to you.

      That said, I refuse (and have refused in the past) to click through to your website. If someone could kindly just paste the article text from his site to /. it would solve the problem of him recieving click-throughs and $$!

    6. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      This leaves Roland Piquepaille with $647 each month


      The Slashdot readership that can see through Roland Piquepaille's farce objects on the basis that he stands to make a generous amount of money


      Wow, a whole $647 per month! What would I possibly do with that much money. I can't even dream that big!
    7. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by mOoZik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Newsflash: that's how all newspaper sites make their money! They mostly copy the content from original sites, add in a few pieces of opinion, and make money on subscriptions, but usually just advertisement. Hell, that's what Slashdot does, too! How do you think Slashdot makes money? And it is my belief that they make tens of thousands. But that's not the point: the point is that Slashdot does it, Roland does it, everyone else does it: that's how it is. Stop bitching.

    8. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by slungsolow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Newspapers actually pay for services like the AP or UPI or Reuters.

      Roland makes money by copy and pasting articles and then writing a few sentences about them. I have nothing against his blog. I do have something against him profiting from it.

    9. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny...upon visiting primidi.com I don't see any advertisements as you claim. Yes, it could be a very recent change, but before you post a flame book maybe you should verify your claim. Looks to me like he's using geeklog as his syndication engine btw.

    10. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by hunterx11 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Roland Piquepaille (780675) is a troll. rpiquepa (644694) is the real Roland Piquepaille. Just look at which one has accepted stories. Whether you like him or not, don't attribute the parent's idiocy to him.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    11. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by slungsolow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only difference, would be Roland profiting for doing absolutely nothing. He could have just as easily put the article text on slashdot.

      I hate to use the phrase "site whore", but that is essentially what he is doing. I feel the same way when anyone else uses the same dishonest tactic. There is no need for a middleman in the process when slashdot is already providing this service.

    12. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by daniil · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This Roland cat isn't providing any service not already adequately met.

      Yet each month, a hundred thousand people read the things he posts. It appears that he does serve some function. What he does is saving some people the trouble of having to search for this "interesting" stuff by themselves.

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    13. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the point is that Slashdot does it, Roland does it, everyone else does it: that's how it is.

      All of this is news to me, but it seems to me that the real point is the apparent 100% acceptance rate of these articles. If there is some sort of arrangement between Slashdot and Roland, basic ethics would dictate that the connection be disclosed to readers -- like on TV News when they say "XYZ Company, which is owned by the parent company of this network, announced today..."

      There is nothing wrong with posting links to articles others have written in order to generate traffic and make money, which, as you point out, both Slashdot and Roland do. But publishing a news service and selecting your news based on a financial arrangement is a little shady.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    14. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bah. Idiot mods. They usually have no sense of humor, no insight, and well... no sense at all. However, I will say this. I've noticed that if someone says something that may annoy one of the Slashdork crew, you tend to get a ton of "Offtopic" or "Overrated" mods. I wish I could meet one of the mods in person just once. Just once... ;P

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  2. Nnooooo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not another Roland article spamming his stupid site for advertising dollars!

  3. Doh by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny
    I've been a strong advocate of the social bookmarking service named del.icio.us....

    Nothing says "thanks for providing a great service" like a good post-holiday slashdotting. Note: the burning smell coming from the server room isn't fudge cooking.

    Oh and I noticed they have a "most active" list of links, but no porn section???

  4. After reading the headline by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought it was a way for me to quickly compare all the mortgage offers I get in my email....

  5. Delicious Firefox Plugin by pridkett · · Score: 5, Informative

    The delicious firefox plugin from http://delicious.mozdev.org/ is a little better than this because you can right click on a page and see who else has bookmarked without going to the page. It also gives tons of other nice feature, such as caching of you del.icio.us bookmarks for a sidebar. It's really nice.

    --
    My Slashdot account is old enough to drink...
  6. Smut by superstick58 · · Score: 5, Funny
    I am shocked by the amazing lack of smut on this page. Not that I would want more myself. I am more curious on how this content stays off the lists. Maybe the site has not reached that crowd yet?

    Were has all the pr0n gone?

    1. Re:Smut by hoagieslapper · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know about you, but I don't bookmark my smut. My wife might find out what a pervert I am.

  7. WHADDAYAKNOW by blair1q · · Score: 3, Funny


    sla.shdo.tted

  8. del.icio.us In A Nutshell by smug_lisp_weenie · · Score: 5, Informative

    So you sign up at del.icio.us (a rather akward domain name) and you make yourself a user name. After you've signed up, you get a special web link you can put on the bookmark toolbar of your browser.

    Then later, whenever you then find a page on the 'net you like and want to "bookmark", instead of using your browser to bookmark it, you click on your link to delicious and a window pops up where you can type in a few "tags" that you think describe the page you're visiting.

    What makes delicious so cool is that you don't need to make a complex hierarchy to organize your links: Instead, the program lets you slice 'em and dice 'em based on the tags: Just go to "del.icio.us/userid" and you can browse all your bookmarks.

    Like Wikis, delicious is so powerful because it is so incredibly simple: For instance, typing "del.icio.us/tag/waffles" gives you a list of all sites everyone on delicious has bookmarked about waffles. This simplicity also makes it easy for others to create extensions for firefox (foxylicious) and such.

    Also cool is that if you find other people who create good bookmarks you can set up to be notified when they post new stuff.

    From my expereince, delicious is by far the fastest website dispersing mechanism that exists: Before the big blogs have the latest coolest links, delicious users will already know about it way beforehand, because of the excellent way it can be used to track niche interests on the web.

    1. Re:del.icio.us In A Nutshell by cicho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) So what am I going to do with the three thousand plus bookmarks I've collected over the years? There seems to be no import mechanism

      2) If there is a way to import existing bookmarks, this has interesting security implications. A quick search through my Firefox bookmarks yielded two URLs with username/password included as CGI vars. No website does that for anything important (I hope), these are some forum and mailing list sites, for which I use a low-value password, but people who use the same password for everything they do online are going to be seriously screwed.

      3) What's the gain of opening up my bookmarks file to the world? I mean, why should I care that so many other people bookmarked this or that page? How does it let me find interesting stuff easier than Google?

      4) Social network through browser bookmarks... give me a break. If I view someone else's bookmarks or subscribe to their RSS feed, do we get marked as "friends"?

      --
      "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
    2. Re:del.icio.us In A Nutshell by patro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What makes delicious so cool is that you don't need to make a complex hierarchy to organize your links: Instead, the program lets you slice 'em and dice 'em based on the tags: Just go to "del.icio.us/userid" and you can browse all your bookmarks.

      Anyone tried Spurl or Furl? They seem very similar to del.icio.us. Any recommendations about which one to use?

  9. Re:Del.icio.us by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dear Sirs at del.icio.us,

    You should try hostname v. It'll give you the version of the hostname utility. No really, you should try it!

    Regards,

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  10. Searching SlashDot on DURL by mahesh_gharat · · Score: 3, Funny

    I searched for http://slashdot.org on http://tools.waglo.com/durl
    The result showed hundreds of entries for slashdot with different descriptions.
    At the bottom the last entry description was like this: Community weblog - for coders and geeks. Has interesting reputation management system - "Karma". Despite crap in discussions very frequently points to interesting links.

    I don't know why we have such image in other people's minds.

    On the site 2004weblogawards.com, though slashdot was discussed for the weblog awards, we didn't made it.
    Check the following URL and see what they are talking about: http://2004weblogawards.com/archives/000071.php
    Check for the following comment: I would recommend Slashdot if they weren't so UNIX slanted, and full of idiots.

    I think we (at SlashDot) should enhance our image infront of the world.

    1. Re:Searching SlashDot on DURL by v01d · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think we (at SlashDot) should enhance our image infront of the world.

      I don't think it's the image that is the problem. Slashdot really is predominantly a load of crap packed with idiots who think they're God's gift to computers. There is occasionally a link to some other side which is actually interesting, but it's getting more and more rare.

  11. Article Text = no $$ for roland!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    DURL, a Search Tool for del.icio.us

    I've been a strong advocate of the social bookmarking service named del.icio.us since it started (check here for an example). And almost every single day, a new tool appears and enhances the use of this service. This new one, DURL , written by Robin Millette , lets you type an URL and see if some other people already "delicious'ed it." And this is very efficient because it leads you to people who not only bookmarked the URL, but also assigned to it some pertinent keywords or tags, giving you new and fresh ideas. Services like Bloglines or Technorati among others certainly can return hundreds of links, so they are good for 'popularity contests.' But for building social communities and introducing you to sources you wouldn't have thought of, they don't compare to del.icio.us. Read more for lots of examples...

    As I'm not sure if I convinced you, let's start with a real blog, Smart Mobs .

    If I feed the URL http://www.smartmobs.com/ to Bloglines by submitting the search string "http://www.bloglines.com/citations?url=http://www .smartmobs.com/&submit=Search," I receive 3358 unsorted results.

    If I do the same with Technorati , I find 1,614 links from 1,234 sources, sorted by date.

    In both cases, this produces a number of references which is hard to browse. Why a particular site has quoted Smart Mobs? It's not obvious to find an answer.

    So, it's time to use DURL, which returns a more manageable number of 45 results from del.icio.us.

    http://www.primidi.com/images/durl_1.jpg

    Here is a screen capture of the page returned by DURL. You can see that some people are reading Smart Mobs because they associated it with the concepts of "creativity" or "ubiquitous computing". Others are using tags such as "collaboration," "mobile" or "community." (Credit: Robin Millette/del.icio.us).

    Let's check for example the tag "Social Software."

    http://www.primidi.com/images/durl_2.jpg

    It brings us to del.icio.us/hbryant/social_software . (Credit: del.icio.us). Wow! Exciting! New tools for del.icio.us! Let's visit Soooo del.icio.us people can't stand it! .

    In a summary, with only two clicks, I found a gold mine. Do you know another service which is that efficient?

    Now, let's return to the previous page and check the link to the "community" tag.

    http://www.primidi.com/images/durl_3.jpg

    This time, this leads us to del.icio.us/oubiwann/community . (Credit: del.icio.us). From there, I can now read a "definition of Mundialization" or discover what is the "World Government of World Citizens."

    The more I use del.icio.us, the more I like it. This doesn't mean I'm not using Bloglines or Technorati, but I'm using them for 'exhaustivity,' not for 'discovery.'

    [And here is an additional note for Robin Millette, the author of DURL. In fact, you can do the same search on del.icio.us by adding the string "http://del.icio.us/url?url=" (without the quotes) before the URL you want to see if it has been delicioused. But it might be too geeky for some of you.]

    Source: Robin Millette, December 20, 2004; and various websites

  12. Re:this reminds me by N0decam · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think you mean StumbleUpon

  13. spurl by camcorder · · Score: 2, Informative

    As an alternative to deli.cio.us spurl is a good service for online bookmarking.

    Actually I found spurl's interface best of its kind, and it has really nice browser workarounds to get you ready to spurl easy and fast. Even a spurl firefox extension is out. Spurl has a plugin for IE as well.

  14. DURL is redunadant by EqualSlash · · Score: 2, Informative

    I wonder why the slashdot editors allowed this one to be published in the first place. I am sure any geek on slashdot worth his salt can just easily use this for the same thing:
    http://del.icio.us/url?url=http://www.myurl.com/
    it would be trivial to create a javascript bookmarklet to do just that.

  15. everybody loves Roland - OTT moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
    So, this gets a +5 and then drops like a stone to a two - OK, it's a repeat, but still bears examination. Then Roland, the troll, replies himself.

    Now, there are a lot of insightful replies - all of which dropped like a stone from 3/4/5 insightful to 0/1 insightful in the space of two minutes.

    In my mind this leaves two options:

    1. Lots of people love Roland, but they are shy, and only moderate and don't post
    2. Roland is sleeping with Hemos

    Y'know, I used to respect the anarchy of Slashdot. Now, I don't think there's any way we can trust the objectivity of the editors a bit.

    Or am I really the only one here who think's Roland is a plagiarizing c*nt?

    cLive ;-)

  16. Off-line alternative? by MasTRE · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm looking for a stand-alone alternative. del.icio.us is great, but when the site goes down (as it did when this was posted), you are f-d. What's a good alternative that will do something akin to it? Something that requires a database/server install is fine (and actually preferred, as it's accessible over the net) - the main requirement is that there be some way to back up my data and, in case the server crashes/burns, I can set up a new serv[er|ice] and simply reload my backup. Which I can't do with del.icio.us. I like knowing my data is safe on a DVD-R somewhere.

    I am loathe to use the service because I forsee investing a lot of time and energy in organizing my huge collection of personal bookmarks and I do not wish to risk wasting it in case del.icio.us goes offline (as it certainly will in 1 [week|month|year|decade|century]).

    Ideally, the software would also create a local copy of the page(s) bookmarked, as all pages certainly will go offline (see above).

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
  17. Slashdot Request by gclef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Editors/Slashdot managers,
    in the interest of keeping the discussion on Roland's stories civil, I'd like to make a Slashdot enhancement request: Could you please create a category for Roland's stories, which interested users could remove from the front page (like many people did with the Jon Katz years ago)?

    If people could remove his stories, many of the whining about his stories would vanish, since they'd have a way to avoid him.

  18. Too much information! by sean.peters · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was wondering where the "hoagieslapper" nickname came from!

    Sean