Slashdot Mirror


2004 MN4 Asteroid Odds Inching Up Again

bfwebster writes "The latest update from NASA now gives 2004 MN4 a 1-in-37 chance (probability of 2.7%) of hitting Earth on April 13, 2029. That's a bump up from the 1-in-46 (2.2%) odds given this weekend and almost a 10x increase in probability from the original 1-in-300 odds announced late last week. Interesting times, indeed."

56 of 697 comments (clear)

  1. Space Soap Opera by daniil · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ladies and gentlemen, may i present the new Slashdot soap opera: Asteroid 2004 MN4!!! That's right -- we have ourselves a new SCO! Watch out, for soon, it'll be demanding $699 license fees from all of you!

    --
    Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    1. Re:Space Soap Opera by tambo · · Score: 3, Funny
      Ladies and gentlemen, may i present the new Slashdot soap opera: Asteroid 2004 MN4!!!

      ...with the requisite theme song of course:

      That's great, it starts with an earthquake, birds and snakes, an aeroplane - Lenny Bruce is not afraid. Eye of a hurricane, listen to yourself churn - world serves its own needs, don't misserve your own needs. Feed it up a knock, speed, grunt no, strength no. Ladder structure clatter with fear of height, down height. Wire in a fire, represent the seven games in a government for hire and a combat site. Left her, wasn't coming in a hurry with the furies breathing down your neck. Team by team reporters baffled, trump, tethered crop. Look at that low plane! Fine then. Uh oh, overflow, population, common group, but it'll do. Save yourself, serve yourself. World serves its own needs, listen to your heart bleed. Tell me with the rapture and the reverent in the right - right. You vitriolic, patriotic, slam, fight, bright light, feeling pretty psyched.

      It's the end of the world as we know it.
      It's the end of the world as we know it.
      It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine.

      Six o'clock - TV hour. Don't get caught in foreign tower. Slash and burn, return, listen to yourself churn. Lock him in uniform and book burning, blood letting. Every motive escalate. Automotive incinerate. Light a candle, light a motive. Step down, step down. Watch a heel crush, crush. Uh oh, this means no fear - cavalier. Renegade and steer clear! A tournament, a tournament, a tournament of lies. Offer me solutions, offer me alternatives and I decline.

      It's the end of the world as we know it.
      It's the end of the world as we know it.
      It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine.

      The other night I tripped a nice continental drift divide. Mount St. Edelite. Leonard Bernstein. Leonid Breshnev, Lenny Bruce and Lester Bangs. Birthday party, cheesecake, jelly bean, boom! You symbiotic, patriotic, slam, but neck, right? Right.

      It's the end of the world as we know it.
      It's the end of the world as we know it.
      It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine...fine...

      (It's time I had some time alone)

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    2. Re:Space Soap Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      The asteroid needs it own icon. Now.

    3. Re:Space Soap Opera by pclminion · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This is funny, but it also raises an important point that many people seem to miss.

      Last time I took part in a discussion about asteroid impacts, it was suggested that people who are rich enough would be able to simply buy their way off the planet before the disaster strikes. As in buy with money.

      Think about it. There's a gigantic rock hurtling toward Earth. There are only enough spaceships (let's say) to take 1,000 people off the surface. All life as we know it on Earth is about to be destroyed. Do you: A) Get on your spaceship and get the hell out of there, or B) Accept pieces of paper with dead presidents printed on them in return for allowing other people to get off the planet?

      Even if you survived the ensuing destruction, what good would those little pieces of paper be?

      The rich sometimes seem to think they can buy their way out of any problem, but the total destruction of Earth isn't something that money will save you from.

  2. The odds are now at 100% by waynegoode · · Score: 5, Funny
    The odds of it hitting Earth are now at 100%.

    Or, if you prefer, they are now at 1 in 1,000,000.

    This edition of Fun With URLs has been brought to you courtesy of an overly trusting NASA webmaster.

    1. Re:The odds are now at 100% by glomph · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, Ron the Webmaster is overly trusting, he has his email address directly linked on that 'probability' page. Guess he was trying for maximum impact....

  3. Doomed...? by Boronx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will Bruce Willis even by alive by then?

    1. Re:Doomed...? by KUHurdler · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, the climax of the whole movie is that he was already dead. That's why only the kid could see him.

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
  4. 2004 MN4 Asteroid Odds Keep Inch Up Again by teshuvah · · Score: 3, Funny

    I are not under stand what you is try ing to said hear.

  5. Impact energy by b1t+r0t · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One and a half gigatons. Nice. Even if it landed in an ocean, it would still make quite a splash.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    1. Re:Impact energy by HeghmoH · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ocean would probably be worse. If it landed in the ocean, it would probably be like yesterday's unpleasantness with a great many people killed by tsunami. Landing on land, it would just make a big boom and put a lot of dirt into the air, unless it happened to land in a populated area. Worst case is a city, of course, but that's not likely.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    2. Re:Impact energy by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Try a tsunami about 500x times bigger almost a mile high traveling 20 miles inland destroying everything in its site.

      Keep in mind 90% of the population lives within 100 miles of the coast.

      Devestating indeed.

    3. Re:Impact energy by Broiler · · Score: 3, Funny

      I knew it! That is why I sit in my shack in Wyoming writing manifestos!

      --
      My sigs offend the max # of people all over the world, regardless of race, religion, color, sex or creed. It's a gift.
    4. Re:Impact energy by MinutiaeMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Even if the energy released in 2004-MN4's impact were roughly equal to the energy released in the recent earthquake, I seriously doubt that the effects could be considered comparable. For one thing, ALL of the asteroid's energy will be released in one gigantic explosion when it enters the atmosphere and hits the surface (either land or sea), concentrated in a relatively small area. But the earthquake's energy was released along a huge (700 miles long) segment of the undersea fault, which almost certainly dampened the effects of the quake. Not to mention that quakes typically take place at least several kilometers underground...

      (IANAGOP -- I Am Not A Geologist Or Physicist. But I am using what I think to be logical deductions based on what little I know.)

    5. Re:Impact energy by platypus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't think it's so easy. While you are right that in deep water, the energy of the earthquake was distributed across a very long wave with a very low amplitude (i.e. big wavelength, sic), the shallower shore acted as a kind of "lense", concentrating the energy to a smaller area (shorter wavelength, higher amplitude).
      I assume an asteroid might cause waves with shorter wavelengths even in deep water, but OTOH there'd be not such a "lense effect".
      In the end, the product of amplitude, wavelength and the square of the speed of the wavefront determines the energy, so waves being taller in deep water does not mean they'll be more destructive when hitting the shore - i.e. the earthquake causes the whole of the sea to "move", while an asteroid might mainly impact the surface.
      Since at around 800 km/h, wind resistance is a real factor, higher waves might even be considerably dampened on their way through the sea.

  6. April 13, 2029 by akirchhoff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would this be Friday the 13th?

    1. Re:April 13, 2029 by glitch! · · Score: 5, Funny

      Would this be Friday the 13th?

      That's right, Hot Fudge Sundae arrives on a Friday...

      --
      A dingo ate my sig...
    2. Re:April 13, 2029 by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, April 13, 2029 is a Friday.

      John.

  7. By how things are going... by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Funny
    That gives slashdotters...

    24 more years to try and get laid.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:By how things are going... by isa-kuruption · · Score: 5, Funny

      Stop flaming and/or giving us false hope!

  8. Anarchy! by Lussarn · · Score: 5, Funny

    When can we start the looting?

  9. Assuming everyone dies... by KaiBeezy · · Score: 4, Funny


    this is more likely to kill you than ANY OTHER death due to injury in your lifetime!

    Odds of Death Due to Injury, National Safety Council

  10. When to Worry by mikejz84 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would start to worried if astronomers suddenly started to buy a lot of Boeing and Lockheed stock.

  11. How long till we know? by John+Harrison · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How long does it have to be observed before we know whether it will hit or not? Will a year of observation give us certainty? The Torino scale is a bit strange, given the way that it combines chance of impact, time until impact, and severity of impact. I would think that a three dimensional scale would be more useful.

    1. Re:How long till we know? by mikejz84 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Space.com says it will take a few months, unless they use Arecibo's radar--which would really help norrow the orbit.

    2. Re:How long till we know? by Idarubicin · · Score: 3, Interesting
      More data points are great, but we need higher resolution data than radar can provide at that range.

      The key here is that they're not necessarily looking for angular position--which, you're right, they can get much more accurately using a respectable backyard optical telescope. What Aricebo gives is better information on range and radial velocity (from the time for a radar pulse to return, and its Doppler shift, respectively). This information combined with the optical measurements we already have will give us a much better measure of its course than either technique alone.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  12. Mainstream coverage by mishmash · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Google news's collation of the worldwide media's coverage of this story seams to show that the mainstream serious media is ignoring this story.

    1. Re:Mainstream coverage by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 5, Funny
      Well of course. Until they figure out a way to make some money off of it.

      Asteroid insurance anyone?

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  13. Re:Friday the 13th, part xxxxx by 14erCleaner · · Score: 5, Funny

    On the bright side, this does solve the 2038 rollover of the 32-bit time_t.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
  14. Strange questions.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, we now know the probability of the object hitting the earth. What is the possibility of the object hitting the moon?

    What impact will the earth have if the object hits the moon?

    1. Re:Strange questions.... by dustinbarbour · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Though you are correct, I don't think an asteroid of this size would obliterate the moon. As such, life on Earth would remain largely unaffected I should think. If we were lucky and it hit the bright side of the moon, we may no longer have the so-called "Man in the Moon", but that would be a small price to pay to see such a terrific impact on a body so close to Earth.

  15. HA! by jrwillis · · Score: 4, Funny

    1 in 37? Who'd be dumb enough to worry with odds like that?! Now excuse me, I need to go buy a lottery ticket for this week.

    --
    Keep Austin Weird!
  16. I really appreciate your sig line more by way2trivial · · Score: 5, Funny

    due to your EXCELLENT math skills.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  17. So what happens if reaches 100%? by earthforce_1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It will be intereresting to see what happens on the political front, if it is eventually determined that this thing will hit earth.

    At 300m across, it is small enough to be nuked out of harm's way. And fortunately, we still have a lot of time on our side to plan and fly a mission to blast it to rubble, or at least into a different trajectory. But this would mean at least temporarily revoking some treaties regarding nuclear detonations in space. And how will the bill be divided up? What happens if is eventually determined that this thing will land in central Asia or Africa - will unaffected countries still be willing to pick up the tab?

    Looks like we will need to develop some sort of (funded) international contingency plan to deal with dangers from space, even if it is eventually determined this particular rock will miss us.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
    1. Re:So what happens if reaches 100%? by way2trivial · · Score: 3, Insightful
      at 300m across, it can be moved without a nuke

      gosh, maybe even just a little 'love tap'

      delta V is a function of how hard you smack it, and from how far away..

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    2. Re:So what happens if reaches 100%? by helioquake · · Score: 3, Informative

      First, my apology that I made an error in the previous post. The actual energy requied to move a 300m cube (with density of 3 g/cm3) laterally at 1km/s is about 4e16 joules (I shamefully admit that I forgot about SI unit).

      Now let's fix up some bad concepts here. First, a detonation of a hydrogen bomb will provide impulse force, neither constant or gradual. Second, there is no mass in gamma ray (it's a photon). Alpha particles will be produced but it's insignificant compared to the asteriod, so we can omit them out of our consideration.

      Now taking your number (thanks by the way), 1 mega ton TNT is about 4e15 joules. And like I said, a half of radiation just simply escapes away from the asteroid. Now suppose if the efficiency of radiative momenta is 100% (which is very unlikely, but let's assume that), then it would take 20 mega-ton TNTs at a minimum to give it a little push.

      But again, the 100% efficiency is unlikely. Some photons will part its energy into heat, or re-radiated away. So for the safety factor, I'd feel confident if we are to deploy about 10x, or 200 mega-ton TNTs simultaneously.

      It's not an impossible number, perhaps.

      (ps. I ignore many physics here; the asteroid is bounded by the Sun's gravity and so its potential field must be taken into account as well..well, I will worry about that when NASA comes knocking my door for help).

  18. Sound betting advice by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you ever get a chance to bet on an asteroid wiping out humanity, make sure you bet that it won't; otherwise even if you win you can't collect.

  19. Crash by pete-classic · · Score: 4, Funny

    And I thought the last crash of '29 was depressing.

    -Peter

  20. Chain asteroid by iMaple · · Score: 5, Funny

    How long do we have to wait for this

    Hi
    I am Prince Okabaoakauu of of the microbial strain found on Asteroid Mn4. We control the motion of our asteroid and can divert it safely if the earthlings wish so. However we are not sure if the earthlings(a.k.a. you) want a collision or not. Hence to help us decide , please forward this mail to 12 people within 1 hour of receiving the mail if you do not want a collision. You will also get a free mobile phone and 2 Ipods. If you do NOT immediately forward this email we will assume that you want the collision.
    Thanks

    I JUST RECVD THIS MAIL, PLS FWD IT TO ALL UR FRIENDS

  21. Another link and Impact Effects Calculator! by iamlucky13 · · Score: 4, Informative
    I found another article discussing the asteroid that isn't slashdotted. Even more interesting though is the Impact Effects Calculator

    I ran it through the calculator for a 400 meter asteroid (from the article) made of dense rock (assumed) at 17 km/s and 45 degree impact (suggested by the calculator). I also dropped it in 1000 m of water, as it has a 75% chance of landing in the oceans.

    Results
    • Impact Energy: 1.23 x 10^19 Joules
    • Crater Formed in Seafloor: 2.46 km diameter
    • Earthquake: 6.0 on Richter Scale
    • Radiant Flux at 100 km: 7.68 times that of sun
    Numbers should, of course, be taken with a grain of salt
  22. The probability *should* rise before falling by da+cog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just because the probability keeps going up, it doesn't mean that we are getting increasingly sure that the asteroid will hit Earth. Suppose that the asteroid were going to come close to Earth without hitting it. At first, the impact probability would appear low since the "window" of orbits allowed from the data would be wide. As we got better observations, however, this window would shrink, but the Earth would stay inside it since it's near the center. Thus, for a time the probability of impact would go up, since the Earth would take up a greater percentage of the window. Eventually, though, the window would shrink past the Earth and the probability would go down again.

    I suspect that this is what will happen. Could easily be wrong, though.

    --
    Snarkiness is inversely proportional to wisdom because it emphasizes feeling right rather than being right.
  23. Well Since We're /.ing the site... by firew0lfz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Crazy, I was just checking my bookmark on this when the slashdot article popped up. Anyways..

    Here is the wikipedia page explaining the Torino Scale. I still wouldn't worry about it until the thing hit at least a 8 or so. The article gives a nice explanation of what astronomers would do in warning the governments in the event they thought this thing deserved any real attention.

    Torino Scale
    --
    Try not to let life get in the way of living.
  24. Rocket Upper Stage? by LakeSolon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't see the original author having posted it yet, so here's a link to an interesting theory regarding the possibility that what we're looking at is in fact just the upper stage of a rocket launched some time ago.

    ~Lake

  25. Inching up is to be expected by xihr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Keep in mind that the very nature of the situation will result in the probability slowly creeping upward until (hopefully of course), it is eliminated entirely. The very nature of having a low-probability situation whose likelihood has to be determined with continued measurements to increase the precision of the prediction means that as the likely set of paths is refined, the cylinder that represents the likely set of paths of the asteroid shrinks. Because it shrinks, the probability that it will be at any given point in that cylinder goes up.

    At the point when the cylinder is projected to miss Earth entirely, the probability of impact will suddenly go to (very near) zero. In other words, the very nature of the situation regarding refining the data we have means that the probability will creep slowly upward before it goes to zero. (This happens for all close encounters, of course; it's just that no one's watching the actual probabilities for those too carefully.)

    So the steady rise of the impact probability may be disquieting, but it is not unexpected and does not actually indicate anything particularly additionally troubling going on.

  26. Re:One in 37 by Viking+Coder · · Score: 4, Informative

    1 in 37! Nice. =)

    (Roulette has 18 black, 18 red, and 1 green for those not in the know.)

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  27. Re:We're all gonna die! by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here's something odd. April 13, 2029 is a Friday. Friday the 13th is the end of the world.

    --
    -gjr
  28. Re:Friday the 13th, part xxxxx by ViolentGreen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Plus, if you addd the digits in 13, you get 4 (April being the fourth month of the year.) On top of that if, you subtract 4 (month) and 13 (day) from 2029 and add those digits, you get 5 which is amazingly the same number that you get when you sum the digits in 202 and subtract that from 9.

    Point being, well actually I have no point.

    --
    Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
  29. Re:I can only wonder by cmowire · · Score: 5, Insightful

    See, I think that there's a difference and a gift in disguise here.

    The reason why we don't have a system to deflect asteroids right now is because asteroids are one of those things that "could happen" in the far off future.

    It's like smoking. It's not guaranteed to kill you, and nobody drops dead after a single puff. Some smokers live really long lives. So smoking is viewed as something that's "bad for you", not an instant death sentence.

    Therefore, we've got a lot of people who smoke in the world.

    However, pulling out a shotgun, pointing it at your face, and pulling the trigger is unquestionably lethal.

    Therefore, the only people who do that are people who really want to die.

    The difference is that we don't always think about things that *might* cause harm, but we always think about things that *will* cause harm.

    This is just one of the many ways that the human brain is a little screwed up about risk management. It worked when we were on the plains of Africa and needed to evade predators and manage to survive, but it doesn't necessarily hold up now.

    Now, the blessing in disguize is that a quarter century is very much long enough to figure out what to do. Remember, we've got more than enough knowlege to do it -- computers to plot trajectories, a variety of tested and untested propulsion and power systems, techniques, etc. In the quarter of a century timespan, we may just need to paint one side white to provide the push. So, in some sense, it's even easier than trying to go from nothing to the moon landing.

    But what we lack, like most things in space, is a feeling of urgency to really do something about it. Thus, this is a blessing in disguize. If they give it a decent possibility of really hitting Earth, 25 years in the future, we've got time to do something about it in ways that if they said that it'll probably hit tomorrow we won't.

    Same way I know several folk who, when their doctors told them that they were going to be dead in x years if they didn't quit smoking, were able to go cold turkey.

  30. Three days ahead of the tax deadline. by Dr.+Mu · · Score: 3, Funny

    The IRS income tax deadline in 2029 will be Monday, April 16th. I think, perhaps, I'll file for an extension that year.

  31. Impact effect of a grain of salt. by JeanPaulBob · · Score: 4, Funny
    Numbers should, of course, be taken with a grain of salt
    As you suggest, I ran the figures for a grain of salt through the impact effects calculator.

    Specifically, I used a 0.0003 meter grain of salt with a density of 2165 kg/m^3 (suggested by the I'm Feeling Lucky result for how big is a grain of salt) at 17km/s and 45 degree impact, and dropped it in 1000 meters of water.

    Results
    • Impact Energy: This projectile is so small that it burns up during atmospheric traverse
    • Crater Formed in Seafloor: Are you kidding?
    • Earthquake: It burns up in the freakin' atmosphere!
    • Radiant Flux at 100 km: You're an idiot.
    I really don't see what you're so worried about.
  32. Free Tacos? by telemonster · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does everyone in the world get a free Taco if it hits a Taco Bell?

    --
    Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
  33. Re:One in 37 by TheCabal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    American roulette wheels have 2 greens. There are a few tables here in Vegas that have single green, and the smart roulette player (oxymoron) will take a few minutes to find that table. Most of the big Strip casinos don't carry them, or may have one, tucked away somewhere. The off-Strip casinos are a bit more open with their roulette wheels, or placement of low-minimum blackjack tables (try finding a $5 table at one of the big Strip casinos after 5PM).

  34. If it crashes the aliens better buckle up... by Marton · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to this calculator the crater would be about 9 kilometers in diameter, it would cause a 7.1 strong earthquake and a 44 m/s shockwave a hundred kilometers from the epicentre. (Assuming 90 degree collision angle and iron composition - basically, the worst.)

    Note that this assumes 4940 megatons in kinetic energy, and Nasa says it's "only" 1600.

  35. Hello, 23,000 killed in tidal waves? by raehl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Mainstream media can only handle one natural disaster at a time, and the one that happened NOW is more important than the one which has a 2.7% chance of happening in 25 years.

    Also, we should expect the probability of impact to continue to increase until it either goes to zero (most likely) or 1. This asteroid has a sigma of 0 - that means the MOST LIKELY path is impact. More observations are most likely going to eliminate the outlying paths first, so as we eliminate more and more of the outlying paths of possibility the most likely path will be more and more likely.

    Until we get the observation that says "Ah, yeah, definitely going to miss", and then it'll be zero again.

  36. This just in: asteroid to miss Earth. by shawkin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Latest NASA update shows limited chance of impact.
    1 in 56,000.

  37. Re:I can only wonder by aminorex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since global warming has already been observed, I'd say the chances are about 1 in 1.

    More interesting is whether a methane burp from clathrates will result in a cascade leading to a global extinction event during your lifetime.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-