Slashdot Mirror


Vioxx Replaces Porn as Spam King

An anonymous reader noted that CNN is running a story crowning vioxx the new king of spam, upsetting poor old fashioned pornography. Of course, for me all my spam seems to be about rolexes.

19 of 200 comments (clear)

  1. Same old spam by teiresias · · Score: 4, Funny

    vioxx. pr0n. same thing. it's all about relieving a pain in your muscles.

    course if you have pain in your muscles from pr0n you're uhhh doing it wrong.

    --
    -Teiresias
  2. Why, you ask? by exhilaration · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you're wondering why people would still want Vioxx, it's only dangerous if you a pre-existing cardiac condition. So if you're a healthy 20-something with a bad knee, you're probably really pissed that Vioxx got taken off the market.

    1. Re:Why, you ask? by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Insightful
      > If you're wondering why people would still want Vioxx, it's only dangerous if you a pre-existing cardiac condition. So if you're a healthy 20-something with a bad knee, you're probably really pissed that Vioxx got taken off the market.

      Who cares. All I want to see is spammers being sued into oblivion by the surviving relatives 80-year-olds with heart conditions click "buy" and subsequently kick off.

      We've got enough law enforcement resources to go after 12-year olds who download Titney's Pears albums. Why the fuck can't we have someone go after these "pharmacies" who dispense prescription medications without a license?

      The laws against illegal dispensation of prescription medicine aren't unenforceable like the War On Drugs Paid For By Handing Cash To That Dude On The Corner. These are non-anonymous transactions performed with credit cards and shipped by non-anonymous shippers, and often shipped across national borders over which law enforcement has a legal right to inspect packages for contraband.

    2. Re:Why, you ask? by Desert+Raven · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ah yes, read one article, and suddenly an expert is born. And some other person, who probably didn't read the article, modded it as interesting.

      Yes, in many cases, pain relievers are not necessary, the pain can be relieved through other means. However, this does not make the drug "useless", nor does it actually have any bearing on whether it works or not. Remember that in trials, these drugs are most often compared against placebos, and had better results. So the truth is, they do work.

      And speaking as someone who lives with a person who is in pain 24/7 from degenerative arthritis, I'm glad they're out there. The problems with Vioxx are very unfortunate. It filled a need for a non-narcotic painkiller that was not so harsh on the GI tract. Hopefully, someone will figure out how to develop a version without the cardiac effects.

  3. But they asked AOL!!!! by thewldisntenuff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There were plenty of other people to ask (SpamHaus, maybe the people behind SpamAssassin), but they ask an in-company division for their information on spam. Yes, spam is going down on AOL (as noted in a recent /. story), but couldnt they have asked others along with the numbers from AOL?

    Rant aside, Im suprised it was Vioxx prescriptions - most of the ones I get are for improving my sex life....Vioxx was just named deadly by somebody, wasnt it?

    -thewldisntenuff

    1. Re:But they asked AOL!!!! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Funny

      little do the spammers know that in order to improve it, you need to have a sex life in the first place!

  4. actually read spam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    There may be more vioxx spam than porn spam.. but which of it is CLICKED MORE? eh? EH?

  5. Vioxxis a temporary circumstance ... by stuffduff · · Score: 4, Funny

    Vioxx is a temporary circumstance ... while pr0n is a permeant condition. It's like the difference between "Out for lunch" and "Out to Lunch."

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
  6. Spam for Babyboomers by Ossus_10 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like the spam companies are targeting the baby boomer generation with Arthritis pills. This also happens to be an age group that would be less sucessful at knowing how to stop spam. Ossus

  7. Vioxx topples porn as spam king? by tyleroar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually what the article says is that Vioox prescriptions, ID theft scams, and stock pick information toople porn as spam king. And this is only talking about the spam received by AOL users, not all spam in general.

    --
    Portland, North Dakota Puppies
  8. yourname(misspelled) CH3ap Softw4res by the_bahua · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems that spammers don't even know what they're sending anymore. I get emails with no attachments, no links, just gibberish, with no possible way for me to be that one in eighty-four million that makes them some money.

    Is it not so much about money anymore, and more just about pissing people off?

    in 1924 perspicacity glutton mining. Because of!

  9. Really? by sulli · · Score: 3, Funny

    Want a Watch?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  10. Only on Slashdot... by Ghostgate · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... could the first post get modded redundant.

    1. Re:Only on Slashdot... by complete+loony · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... could the first post about the first post getting modded redundant get modded informative :).
      And the first post about the first post about the first post getting modded redundant getting modded informative could get modded funny?

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  11. It's really disappointing by Ethanol · · Score: 3, Funny

    It used to be that all the spam was telling me to "impress her with my huge new c0ck". Now it's just telling me to "impress her with a r0lex".

    Neither one really speaks well of her, does it? But at least before there was still a certain animal physicality about the relationship. Now it's all about the shiny baubles.

    I don't know... I just don't think this imaginary relationship is going to last. Maybe I should get back out there, start dating again. 'Course, before I can do that, I'll have to do something about this crippling arthritis of mine...

  12. Lucky editor by Turmio · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of course, for me all my spam seems to be about rolexes.

    Well how about that. Lucky you. To me they only offer replicas!

  13. Do spammers think that no women use computers? by Claire-plus-plus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most spam I get is about enlarging my penis, something that being a woman I can't do, or pleasing a woman with my staying power (I can't have erections for some strange reason). Why is it that most spam is aimed at men when it is obvious that women use the net and e-mail as well?

    Today two out of the three I received (new e-mail address they obviously haven't found yet) were telling me to increase how well I can please a woman with exercises and drugs to increase my penis size. It is rather disturbing. One thing I want to know... do men actually think that increasing your penis size will make women ecstatic?

    --
    99 bottles of beer in 175 characte
  14. Wanna R()()1-E-X? by catscan2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Rolex spam has increased for me as well. I'm currently using the following regular expression on our Astaro firewall to block them, which has caught the recent "rolax" and "R-O-L-E-X" variants (remove the extraneous whitespace):

    (?i)r[[:space:][:punct:]_]{0,3}(o|0|\(\)){1,3}[[ :s pace:][:punct:]_]{0,3}(l|1){1,3}[[:space:][:punct: ]_]{0,3}(e|a){1,3}[[:space:][:punct:]_]{0,3}x

    So, bring on the R0001ex!! spam :-)

    Hopefully, the next revision of Astaro will include Rolex spam filters in SpamAssassin so that I don't need to use this custom regex anymore.

    Here's one message that I'd love to see (and hopefully blocked):
    =========

    Gr33tingz, Dear Sir! I'm Dr. Jfjweaiofjweoif Iejfiowefjioe from an official bank in Nigeria and am trying to move $39,000,000 MILLION (million) US DOLLARS (United States currency) worth of \/1@gra pills and C1@li5 out of the country but need to confirm your CitiB@nk banking account details. In exchange for the sum of the transfer, you will have the opportunity to be a man like Britney Spears with real-like r()()()()()1eX watches with a screw-in bezel and a second hand that looks like the real thing. All you have to is click here (http://4.12.44.52:39/removeme/now.idc?really=yes) to install a FREE screensaver, which, if you're using Outlook [Express], should already be installed by the time you read this sentence! WOW! HOW CONVENIENT! Our online pharmacy is ready to take your orders for cheating housewives in your area, but HURRY! At these prices, they won't last long!

  15. Re:NULL body messages by dragonman97 · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you look at the headers, you'll find that they're extraordinarily sparse. In some cases, the receiving server will add a little bit of data to keep clients happy, by adhering to RFCs (adding "Date:" and the like. As far as I can tell, this is being done as the most accurate recepient verification system they can dream of. VRFY is not accurate, as many receiving systems will say "Well, I don't know that address, but it's in my domain, so I'll try and receive it." If you do everything up to, but not including the DATA part, there's a chance the server might be sloppy or ignorant. If it accepts the message for delivery without error, then there's a decent chance that address exists. This battle is really getting ugly, and will keep escalating - there is no FUSSP, other than hunting down the spammers and stringing them up with piano wire where it'll hurt them.