Slashdot Mirror


LiveJournal Buyout Confirmed

Kingfox writes "Brad Fitzpatrick, creator of LiveJournal, finally confirms the story that was posted to Slashdot yesterday. Six Apart has purchased Danga. This means that they're moving to San Francisco, LiveJournal users are finally getting the trackback feature, but the project will stay open source, and little else will change for the end user."

34 of 223 comments (clear)

  1. Changes by tuxter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They aren't going to raise their prices OR make any other significant changes other than "look and feel" i.e. make it prettier. I wonder how long the "No price changes" will last, I'm willing to bet not long.

    1. Re:Changes by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, they were planning on never ever changing their prices, not ever. If they do, you should sue! Oh hell yes.

      --
      Do you see what I did there?
    2. Re:Changes by somethinghollow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One thing I hope they change is getting more / faster servers. That site is really slow. Sadly, all my friends blog on it. So, I have to brave the slowness every once in awhile.

      Another thing that I hope they change, though it has no bearing on me since I don't blog there, is their theme system. It's pretty convoluted to learn. I don't know why they don't just let you use CSS. 90% of the custom themes I've seen could be done with the right HTML and some CSS. At least then after you spent hours working on your LJ page with CSS, you could use it in the "real world." After learning LJ formatting, all you can do is format LJ (AFAIK).

    3. Re:Changes by NeoChaosX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One thing I hope they change is getting more / faster servers. That site is really slow. Sadly, all my friends blog on it. So, I have to brave the slowness every once in awhile.

      Agree here. If I had a nickel for everytime the server timed out on me or I ran into a "The document does not exist" error while surfing LJ, I'd probably have enough to keep a Paid LJ account for life. They need to get more bandwidth, faster server, or both.

      --
      One man's selflessness is another man's annoyance.
    4. Re:Changes by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's only slow if you don't have a paid account. I agree that their theme systems (both of them) are totally from hell.

  2. Little will change...? by JediLow · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sure, just like they weren't being bought...

  3. Ads already in place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    People are already reporting ads on LJ, even for paid users: http://www.livejournal.com/users/girlvinyl/178809. html

    1. Re:Ads already in place by Tink2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Er, did you bother to go look at her references?

      It's quite clear (especially if you actually go look at the pages she cites) that she's been spywared.

    2. Re:Ads already in place by BenSpinSpace · · Score: 2, Informative

      The person reporting the ads seems to be the only person seeing them. Therefore, "Person" is reporting ads, not "People." And it could very well be spyware.

      The people running LiveJournal seem to be quite aware of an average user's worries about the project; hell, Brad Fitzpatrick himself seems to be one of the crowd who has chosen specifically not to sell his soul to the devil. RTFA to hear what he's actually saying. As he says, "Really you shouldn't see any negative changes." The LiveJournal operators wouldn't violate this statement within moments of its being posted!

      Viewing these changes in LiveJournal as positive things may seem bleak at first, but these advancements require a bit of faith. There will always be people to decry every bit of progress as "turning to the dark side," but I, for one, have faith in several of my favorite Internet organizations: Slashdot, LiveJournal, Something Awful, Google, and Amazon, to name several. Usually even their most questionable steps eventually wind up in the bounds of smart thinking and usually good taste.

  4. Thank goodness for TrackBack by FleaPlus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    TrackBack is a damned handy system, which lets you see which other blogs have linked to a particular post that you've made. It's seen in many of the more "professional" blogs, and it's a great tool for finding out about commentary on your posts. I was actually thinking of ditching LiveJournal for a service which supported TrackBack, but I guess I'll now be able to stick around.

  5. Story from previous day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, I guess when "sources close to Brad Fitzpatrick" said that LiveJournal was not being sold... well, not so much eh?

  6. Nice quote by FleaPlus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's an interesting blog post by Mena, President of Six Apart. I thought the following quote was interesting in the context of the typical "bloggerz sux0r" threads you see on slashdot:

    I believe that LiveJournal has, unfortunately, received a bum rap because many have considered the postings on LiveJournal to be trivial. It's sort of like a vicious circle: Journalists make fun of webloggers saying that they only post about their cats, webloggers make fun of LiveJournalers saying that they only post about high school angst and LiveJournalers make fun of webloggers saying that they are SUV-driving yuppies who think they have something important to say (and I'm generalizing). The fact is, webloggers and LiveJournalers are in essence doing the same thing: they are posting their thoughts to people who are important to them. For some webloggers, it's 100,000 people, for others it is 10. For LiveJournalers, it may be 30 people, it may be 3 (or a combination of some number).

  7. Hey, amateur porn is where it's at... by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 4, Informative

    So long as the amateur porn stays in place, and I can continue to co-admin my porn community, then all is well. (You need to get an account to read the community, and list a valid 18+ birthdate, and submit a join-request. This is so the community doesn't get deleted. It's a CYA maneuver by the livejournal administration to ensure that everybody who watches porn can lie about their age.)

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  8. Correction by wankledot · · Score: 3, Informative

    SA is buying Livejournal fromDanga, they are not buying Danga itself.

    --
    My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    1. Re:Correction by Apathetic1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe your post is technically correct but it's also misleading. Six Apart may not be buying Danga but the Danga employees will be moving to San Francisco, at least according to the news post:

      What happens to the Danga employees?
      We're moving to San Francisco! *ding ding*
      --

      My username does not make me Apathetic. It's irony, get it?

    2. Re:Correction by stephenbooth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Someone asked Brad directly if it was Danga or just LJ that was being sold and he stated it was all of it.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
  9. Six Apart v Google by RobertTaylor · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Why is Six Apart buying LiveJournal?
    Lots of reasons:

    Together we form super robot that's stronger than the sum of its parts.
    Super robots can fight super companies."


    Blogger.com bought up by Google...

    To think that millions of £££ venture capital will be spent over which system publishes what 14 year old Lisa's dog ate last night.

  10. Re:Well by Anubis350 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I notice you're a subscriber to slashdot. Do you have these same arguments about slashdot (bought by corporation, lots of adverts, etc). This is just like when /. was bought by OSDN, and just like slashdot, LJ is and will remain open source. Why are the two any different....

    I call hypocrite...

    --Anubis

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  11. Re:What's the business model? by Rakishi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You are assuming that LJ doesn't make money already.

  12. Though everyone complains about LJ... by shawnywany · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I tried getting my journal back on my domain for good, but I just cannot leave a couple of Livejournal's features.

    One, I keep a tightly-knit friends-list, and sadly enough, those people would not read my journal regularly if it were not on Livejournal. On LJ, it's just a matter of opening up the "friends page" and seeing all of your friends' entries at once. Handy and keeps you and your buddies close, even if you rarely have the chance to really chat or talk.

    Two, I adore the communities. When I need information on some subject, there's always a community. Not only that, but it's usually active. I prefer having a human helping hand rather than that of a search engine; both at once are even better (ha.) For example, I trust the ladies at the VaginaPagina community to relate experiences and help--especially since everyone is there to do just that.

    I used to scoff at LJ, but now that I'm there, I just can't leave.

    1. Re:Though everyone complains about LJ... by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes but the issue is not whether I know about RSS readers and can be bothered to download and use one, it's whether I can convince 150+ of my LJ readers to do so. Just about everyone I know has an LJ, but few if any are using RSS readers.

      Also RSS readers alone don't solve the problem of private "friends only" posting (afaik) - someone would still need an LJ account to be able to read my non-public entries, so once they've done that, it's usually easier to just use the Friends page system. If I was hosting my journal on my own website, I'd need to give people an account/password just to read the non-public entries of my journal, which is more hassle.

  13. LJ Backup/Export to XML by NeuralAbyss · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wrote this script after hearing the rumours.. can also be a good thing if you just want a backup of your livejournal.

    LJExport v0.1

    Any comments are welcome.. released under the BSD license.

    1. Re:LJ Backup/Export to XML by Malk-a-mite · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.livejournal.com/export.bml

  14. Nervous by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay, being a five-year user of LJ (user number 1112, suckers) and perm-account holder, I've got a considerable stake in all this. It makes me nervous. I'm not familiar enough with Six Apart and their treatment of MT to be confident in their ability to maintain the status quo around LJ-land. I'm afraid that the business will do what all businesses do, and eventually change from being "for the people" to being "for the profit."

    There are literally hundreds of thousands of people who have put time and effort into their own little portion of the Internet, and I'm afraid that with one motion Brad's damaged their stock. The thing is - this is something Brad's been putting his life into for around six years now. If anything he's got the most to lose. (Ignoring the nice chunck of change he jsut pocketed.) Hopefully he walked into this with due diligence and maintains some official control over where LJ will head.

    I suppose that's the one question I haven't seen answered - from what Brad said, it seems like he's now just an employee. Any official power he now has is ceremonial. So I hope he made the right choice.

    --
    ± 29 dB
    1. Re:Nervous by idiotnot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I haven't been on LJ nearly that long, but I share your concerns.

      I don't trust SixApart as far as I can throw them. That Brad does is all well and good, but I don't. Not after what they did with the MT license. I help maintain a community machine shared among about 70 people. We had quite a few users who were using MT to host blogs. Mind you, this is a community machine, composed of donated hardware, run with donated power and bandwidth. SixApart refused to give us a free license for the new version. They wanted $500, or whatever it was. They said that we could do the individual install thing, but we would have had to have each user install his own copy of MT. Because some of our users aren't geeks, this was really out-of-the question.

      In the end, we ended up doing lots of work moving people to WordPress. But I really don't want to do business with SixApart after the way they handled MT. So, I think I probably be taking down my LJ sometime soon. It's sad, really, because I do enjoy using it.

      Just my $0.02.

  15. As a livejournal user... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new corporate overlords.

  16. Re:What's the business model? by FleaPlus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Perhaps we'll see livejournal being touted as a more "personal" free solution, with Movable Type touted as the more "professional" solution. I figure we'll see greater interoperability between the two, allowing LJ'ers to easily add Movable Type blogs to their friends list, and vice versa. Overall, this would lead to a greater incentive to choose LJ/MT instead of, say, Blogger.

  17. Re:What's the business model? by captnitro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In addition to the "compare and contrast" contributions we'll see, it's also this: in the next decade, it will be about a return to communities on the web. In the early 90s it was a bunch of local BBSs, and now the web is too big to be a "community" most of the time. People want to reach out to other people, and blogs, for better or for worse, often do that. (For worse, I know I've made fun of blogs as a way for people to be passive-aggressive to those they don't want to talk to in person.. :)

    I think Six Apart wants to be a major force in that movement, in generating communities, and how communities will play into the future of the web and how we communicate with one another. For one, LJ subscribers (myself included) will be paying Six Apart AFAIK, not Danga, so there's profit there. Also, competition; the fewer games in town, or the more that you control, the better.

    On a separate note, does anybody seem to see a trend with the next 'dot-com' being funded open-source, or even just homegrown, web solutions ("we're not selling the product, we're selling the service")? It seems like I've heard of quite a few open source projects getting bank from just being good for long enough.. one clear example being Linux, but also reading Mena's blog -- (paraphrased) "me and my husband released Moveable Type in 2001, when I was 24". Now they have offices in Tokyo, Paris, and San Francisco. It seems like I need to find a killer app and a web server.

  18. Not so easy to ignore sometimes.. by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... when you're doing a Google search and blogs are cluttering up the first 200 pages of results, it's kind of hard to just "ignore them."

    1. Re:Not so easy to ignore sometimes.. by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're certainly right - my point was that sometimes it's not so easy to ignore blogs because there are so many of them with that trackback feature, that it's becoming very easy for them to clutter up search engines. It's even worse when you are looking for something and find nothing but blogs linking to "it" ("it" being an article you're looking for) but "it" is now a 404. Example: Dell put up a funny ad. Lots and lots of bloggers were posting about it and linking to the LA Times website. Well, the LA Times expired that image. None of the bloggers mirrored it, so now they're all linking to something that isn't there anymore.

      It's just kind of annoying overall. :|

  19. Mood: by rmart · · Score: 2, Funny

    depressed :(

  20. Re:Will this affect supervision/abuse? by L.Bob.Rife · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ex's will always find a way to tell negative stories to mutual friends. Don't blame livejournal for your ex-gf being a bitch.

  21. hah, 'still open source' .. not for long by FuzzieNorn · · Score: 2, Informative

    They've ripped their commitment to keeping the site as Free Software out of their social contract (which they've renamed to 'guiding principles' anyway).

    Details of the change are here.

  22. Re:LJ trackbacks will make Google go wonky... by djsmiley · · Score: 3, Informative

    Google ranks is clever like that.
    As if the first page in the pile has a low rank, it gives off an even smaller part of this to the next page. Now, if a BIG blog which was very popular joined this, it would effect maybe 1 or 2 tiers down but after this yet again its gone.

    This means only the BIG blogs can stay at the top, and anyway when googling, how many blogs do you click?

    I know i never click any, not by habit but because there is none there. I guess this is due to the almost randomness of the infomation contained therein.

    Oh and so you know im not bshitting about what i know about google, my sites listed top for djsmiley, djsmiley2k, tim bowers, and a few other terms...
    The method? Add sensible content, add adwords, and add links to all my bookmarks.

    At first when someone does something different google ranks tend to end up ranking it highly, but as soon as everyone catches on, it drops again to a normal level.

    (now waiting for home PC to get /.'ed

    --
    - http://www.milkme.co.uk