Slashdot Mirror


Google's 20-Year Usenet Timeline

theRG writes "Google just released its 20-Year Usenet Timeline. Among the highlights: First Mac rumor, first 'me too' post, Tim Berners-Lee's announcement of the Web, and Linus' announcement of Linux."

37 of 412 comments (clear)

  1. Alas they didn't get the first by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

    first post! I probably failed it

    1. Re:Alas they didn't get the first by jdunn14 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Me too!!!

  2. Linus by debilo · · Score: 5, Funny

    From Linus' announcement:

    I can (well, almost) hear you asking yourselves "why?". Hurd will be out in a year (or two, or next month, who knows), and I've already got minix.

    The Hurd. Beautiful.

    1. Re:Linus by SenorMooCow · · Score: 4, Funny

      I like this quote from Linus:
      If you write programs for linux today, you shouldn't have too many surprises when you just recompile them for Hurd in the 21st century.

      As if anyone would want to compile something for Hurd in the 21st century :)

      --
      I run a Debian/Kernel/Knoppix Mirror: (http|ftp|rsync)://debian.ams.sunysb.edu/
      apt-get @ > 5MBps == teh win!
    2. Re:Linus by voisine · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Be thankful you are not my student. You would not
      get a high grade for such a design :-)" - Andy Tanenbaum to Linus, Jan 30 '92

  3. This has been around for a while... by kaden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Heh, this was reported on Slashdot over ago...

    1. Re:This has been around for a while... by TrevorB · · Score: 4, Informative

      And even then, it was old news.

      The last item on the list behind the link:

      11 Dec 2001 Google offers 20-year Usenet Archive

      Which makes this story not only a dupe, but 3 years old as well...

      If we keep this up we'll start seeing dupe John Katz posts any time now.

    2. Re:This has been around for a while... by darc · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shh, this is our chance to karma up and reuse the jokes from the old thread! Dammit, now you've gone and spoiled it.

      --
      Tired of legitimate data sources? Try UNCYCLOPEDIA
    3. Re:This has been around for a while... by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Informative
      I think the difference is that the old article mentioned that google news has 20 years of data, but this one links to a timeline page. Related, closely, but still different.

      No, the timeline featured in today's dupe was also linked in the old post. Same page: http://www.google.com/googlegroups/archive_announc e_20.html both times.

  4. To Ron at Rutgers: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Expect a call from Apple Legal. Steve doesn't like having his surprises ruined.

  5. Hurd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hurd will be out in a year or two" - Linus

    It cracks me up every time.

    1. Re:Hurd by Deusy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps it would have been if Linus and Linux hadn't shown up?

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

  6. Justice Must Be Done... by stevens · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone hunt down and kill that "Me too" guy with AOL CDs.

  7. Such a nice young man by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'm also interested in hearing from anybody who has written any of the
    utilities/library functions for minix. If your efforts are freely
    distributable (under copyright or even public domain), I'd like to hear
    from you, so I can add them to the system. I'm using Earl Chews estdio
    right now (thanks for a nice and working system Earl), and similar works
    will be very wellcome. Your (C)'s will of course be left intact. Drop me
    a line if you are willing to let me use your code.

    It's no accident that Linux was such an pleasant project to hack on way back when, Linus is just such a humble and polite person. He still is today. What ever happened to that? These days you're lucky to get a reply to an email when offering to contribute code to an open source project, let alone someone actually thanking you for going to the effort of making something for others to enjoy.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Such a nice young man by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 4, Insightful
      These days you're lucky to get a reply to an email when offering to contribute code to an open source project, let alone someone actually thanking you for going to the effort of making something for others to enjoy.
      You do still get nice responses those but at a guess I'd think people are more likely to face email overload today. It's not that people themselves are rude as such, they just get more email than they can cope with satisfactorally.

      A good friend of mine works on Linux and it's scary watching him open his mailbox. We're best mates and I don't often get timely responses to emails I send him!

      His email is at least fairly focused. I imagine people who work on things that are more user facing (GNOME, KDE etc) must get a whole lot of stuff coming their way...
      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    2. Re:Such a nice young man by The+Cydonian · · Score: 3, Interesting
      It's no accident that Linux was such an pleasant project to hack on way back when, Linus is just such a humble and polite person.
      Tell me, were you being ironic? :-) I mean, for fuck's sake, Linus was involved in the only flamefest we were "taught" about in a CS course!
      These days you're lucky to get a reply to an email when offering to contribute code to an open source project, let alone someone actually thanking you for going to the effort of making something for others to enjoy.
      Hate adding to a Good Ol' Times meme, but those USENET oldies sure had a lot of time back then; I mean, look at this fascinating posting from 1993. The guy not only demolishes the OP's points, but also deconstructs his writing style as well! You really don't get that sort of stuff these days in discussion fora, USENET or not, so it's probably more to do with netiquette back then, and less to do with Linus himself. (Which of course, is not to say he's not a great guy).
  8. Map of usenet by Pedrito · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm particularly fond of their
    current map of usenet done with ascii art.

    I'll give $5.00 to the first person to provide an updated ascii art usenet map.

    1. Re:Map of usenet by agildehaus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Porn
      |
      |----Usenet----Internet----Me
      |
      Warez

    2. Re:Map of usenet by duffster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Try the copy on UK Google Groups, which looks much better. Hopefully Google won't alter the link automatically (they now change google.com to google.co.uk in the UK).

      So, about that $5.00... ;-)

  9. Just Released???? by Jack+Porter · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's been over 3 years since this page went up!

    From the linked page:

    11 Dec 2001 Google offers 20-year Usenet Archive

  10. y2k prediction by tutwabee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I like the Y2K prediciton one. http://groups-beta.google.com/group/net.bugs/brows e_frm/thread/64696a1b035aab72 I didn't realize it was predicted so long ago.

  11. Sex Stories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    What about the first alt.sex.stories post?!

  12. A giggle-inducer by shigelojoe · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the first mention of "Return of the Jedi":
    I can't really imagine waiting until 1997 to see all nine parts of the Star Wars series.

    How about waiting until 2005 to see the first six?

    1. Re:A giggle-inducer by Galvatron · · Score: 4, Insightful
      ...And having it be so terrible that we've lost interest?


      Seriously, I wish we could go back in time and tell him not to look forward to it too much...

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  13. Coming Soon! by Garabito · · Score: 5, Funny
    Slashdot 7 year timeline!

    • First "First post!"
    • First "In Soviet Russia" post
    • First Goatse.cx troll
    • First GNAA troll

    • and,

    • CmdrTaco announcement of the iPod.
    1. Re:Coming Soon! by g00z · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dude you must be new here:

      Some (humble) recommendations:

      * First "Pancake Ninja" troll
      * First "Ogg the open source caveman" post
      * First "Jon Kats Sucks" post
      * First appearance of the Bill Gates Borg icon

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
  14. The new google groups by leoval · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The first impression after following the links is how weird the new google groups look. The whole censorship of the original emails is enough to destroy any sense of "history" in the posts.

    I would rather prefer a "perfect" archive, where anyone looking could get a copy of the intact document that was posted at that time.

    I wonder if a balance can be achieved between email harvesting and protecting the original documents.

  15. This is Bill Gates first post by br00tus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bill Gates posted to net.micro on July 22, 1983 from microsoft.uucp (from the account of Gordon Letwin, although he signs it as himself) talking about his crazy days at Harvard where he learned to do PEEKs and POKEs (cool, If I was using my Commodore-64 right now I'd do a POKE 53281,6 in honor of Bill)

    1. Re:This is Bill Gates first post by bergeron76 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why not simplify things and just:

      10 POKE eye_socket
      20 POKE eye_socket+1
      30 goto 10

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  16. Publication Date???? by sljgh · · Score: 3, Informative

    Clearly no one saw the 2003 at the bottom of the page.

  17. Re:Broken link by piquadratCH · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can find it here

  18. Googles Usenet search is really really bad. by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been using usenet since 89, seen many different usenet programs and web interfaces. Just for the heck of it, I tried to search some old amiga/commodore groups, and early fido/bbs groups, what a lack of searchs. I did some searchs back before google took over, and Deja had those posts, google seems to be missing information.

    Search by reverse date is missing.
    Threaded and hourly view is missing, too much crap on the screen.
    Side bars in the way. (Again more crap)

    Pretty much, I browse a few groups, but with perlmonks and other major discussion groups going to forums and leaving usenet, its more of a legacy I still enjoy than can use.

    Always wished people using bbforums would have an archived usenet feed just to keep a history. Also you dont need to belong to the forum.

    I feel forum's killed usenet, and forums are rather weak.
    How many forums are you on? Slashdot and about 6 dozen more.

    While im glad Google has taken over, I wish they could at least make a forum interface that doesnt suck.

  19. Re:My prediction for the near future. by Chatmag · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm basing that on several factors. Checking the Alexa rankings over the past few months, Google Groups have gone from about 7% of all Google users down to 1% as of a few moments ago. Granted, Alexa is not the most accurate measurement of a site, but it does give some indications as to overall popularity.

    Some of their own statistics show that most groups have low activity: Group-Society Activity High (167) Low (6712) Medium (137)

    All of the other groups show low activity as the largest numbers. They simply do not have the eyeballs hitting the groups.

    They do not show Adsense ads in groups, at least none that I've found. It's all paid for by ad revenue from other Google areas.

    The groups that are not moderated have degenerated into ad spam fests, driving off people interested in those groups topics.

    I think that when Alexa shows less than 1% of users, Google will decide it's no longer worth keeping.

    I do agree with you that Usenet can be useful for finding answers, I use a combination of Google search and Groups search. I still think Google will rethink Groups, either dumping it, or correcting the problems. (I'm leaning toward them dumping it).

    --
    Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
  20. First Mention of Slashdot.org by tinrobot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nov 4, 1997

    This will link to it: http://tinyurl.com/6sz2j

    Why is it in a strange language?

    First English mention is Nov 14, 1997.

    http://tinyurl.com/5snrm

  21. Douglas Adams' post, forever the optimist. by cgenman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'll try and post news here from time to time if it
    seems like it might interest people - for instance, it looks as if the HHGG
    movie is finally coming after the shelf after 10 years.


    This post was made in 1993.

  22. Anyone catch the www response by drix · · Score: 5, Funny
    Even better is what some smartass posted 12 years later in response to the original www thread:
    Tim,

    I have to say that this "world wide web" thing sounds like a ridiculous concept. I can't imagine it will take off. Next thing you'll tell us is that people can do commerce through the "web" or even browse pornography! I would never invest in it. I am going to put my money in something with real potential, namely a floppy disk that can hold 1.8 megabytes. This should be able to hold all the data you could possibly want to carry around with you, for decades to come.
    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  23. First Y2k solution by Cainjustcain · · Score: 5, Funny
    "In 1978, when I was working in banking, I ran across a curious date storage format. It seems that transaction dates were coded with the last digit of the year in one nibble, the month in hex in the next, and the date (in packed decimal) in the next two

    "Good grief!" said I. "What happens in January of 1980?" She turned pale and admitted she had considered that before but managed to put it out of her mind. "So why not go ahead and fix it now?" I asked.

    She pointed out that fixing it would require expanding the demand deposit master record format, a mammoth undertaking. About a billion COBOL programs would have to be recompiled. At this shop we were still on cards and a rush compile took about a week. "You want to do that?" she inquired. This time I turned pale. We onsidered our options, knowing that one or the other of us would be called upon to fix the problem. And you know what we did?

    First, I modified the daily demand deposit program with code that checked for the date and about mid-1979 started printed warnings on the console of what would happen come new year. Then the systems analyst and I got new jobs. This is known as stepwise interactive development."