Slashdot Mirror


HP's New iPAQ hx2755 Reviewed

Brandon Miniman submitted a story that discusses the whole iPAQ line of handhelds and specifically looks at the newly released iPAQ hx2755 Pocket PC. This one is unique in that it has a biometric fingerprint reader.

101 comments

  1. Is there any standarised protocol? by kers · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if these fingerprint thingies got any standardised protocol for verifiying data - or does all vendors have their own system?

    1. Re:Is there any standarised protocol? by honkeytron · · Score: 1

      Not too sure if the private sector has a standard, but it looks like the government (US) has one in place.

      NIST SP 500-245

    2. Re:Is there any standarised protocol? by Arimus · · Score: 2, Informative

      One standard which might gain acceptance is the Biometric XML standard.

      (PCMag news article http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0%2C1759%2C31950%2C0 0.asp )

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    3. Re:Is there any standarised protocol? by cHALiTO · · Score: 1

      The NIST specifications are only for data transfer between AFIS systems. Fingerprint matching algorithms are not standarized and every company has its own.

      The fingerprint reader in the ipaq seems to be capacitive (as opposed to an optical reader, which would take more place) which are not so good, and have a limited life expectancy.
      All serious biometric devices use optical readers, but those tend to be bulkier and more expensive.

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    4. Re:Is there any standarised protocol? by jalilv · · Score: 1

      There is Biometrics Consortium which works towards creating standards for Biometrics. There is also BioAPI Consortium which which has standardized BioAPI. All the Biometric SDKs that I know of implement BioAPI.

      Jalil Vaidya

  2. Not new by opusman · · Score: 4, Informative

    iPAQs have had fingerprint readers for over a year now. 5550 was the first I think?

    1. Re:Not new by slakr · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 5450. The 5550 was the update of that device with WM2003.

    2. Re:Not new by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Make that 3 years now- but this is the first reasonably priced model to have it. IPAQs since the merger with HP can generally be divided into 4 categories: Phones, Early Adopter Wow Models, Business Usage Models, and Media Players. The 5550 was an Early Adopter Wow Model, the 4755 is it's direct replacement. The 2755 is the replacement for the business usage 2215.

      My question is- is slashdot getting paid for this, this is the second review in under two weeks for this particular IPAQ and I didn't learn anything new.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  3. Slashvertising? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok, without having read the FA, I'll make a prediction about this article:
    1) The article reads like a press release from H-P.
    2) The submitter is just pushing traffic to his own site in the hopes he can cash in on some advertising revenue.

    Am I correct or am I correct?

    1. Re:Slashvertising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you might be correct, but then I feel my choices are limited.

    2. Re:Slashvertising? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      1) incorrect- HP press release would NEVER mention Windows Media Version (still 9 not 10) or the QVGA screen (when HP already has a full VGA model, as well as some of their competitors). Final analysis was "surprisingly good machine- now if HP could only get it right".

      2) correct, it seems.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Slashvertising? by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      He'll need the traffic to pay the bandwidth bill he just brought upon himself...site's down.

      p

    4. Re:Slashvertising? by priestx · · Score: 0

      He doesn't seem to understand the principle of "Slashdotting."

      --
      "To be is to do." -Socrates
      "To do is to be." -Jean-Paul Sartre
      "Do-be-do-be-do." -Frank Sinatra
    5. Re:Slashvertising? by somethinghollow · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't think he wants ad rev. I think he wanted to do a load test. As you can see, he faild that test.

    6. Re:Slashvertising? by IdahoEv · · Score: 1
      2) The submitter is just pushing traffic to his own site in the hopes he can cash in on some advertising revenue.

      2) correct, it seems.

      Since his server was slashdotted before there were even five comments posted, it would seem this strategy was ill-advised.

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    7. Re:Slashvertising? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Since his server was slashdotted before there were even five comments posted, it would seem this strategy was ill-advised.

      I read it as a subscriber before it went public- my guess is his overuse of graphics and horrendous ammounts of banner and sidebox advertising got to him. The rest of the site was simple enough- but if I was ever going to do this, I'd want the entry page to be under 100k, tops, with no banner advertising.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    8. Re:Slashvertising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, adverts are mostly useless when traffic is coming from slashdot.

      People should stop complaining about so called slashverts. Perhaps the article could contain something you didn't previously know.

      (press releases are another matter)

      But the crowd coming from slashdot are so technically adept, that they never click on the ads! (I know this because I have a friend who got linked to).

      In fact, some (if not most) advertising companies pay on a % click through rate. So these sites are going to get a _large_ throughput of users, with no clicks. So their advertising will be mostly useless.

  4. Fingerprint reader on a PDA is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could have sworn i have seen PDA's with fingerprint readers in the past.....

  5. ipaq=decent functionality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but they feel like plastic light weight junk and they look like s.

  6. Unique fingerprint reader? by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

    Read The Friendly Article...

    "Like the HP iPAQ h5450 and h5550, the hx2755 has an integrated biometric fingerprint reader"

    My 5455 has a great fingerprint reader, had it foe a while...

    -MrLogic

    1. Re:Unique fingerprint reader? by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      if you know HP's ipaq numbering scheme, the 5450 and 5455 are the exact same model. Same goes for the 5550 and 5555.

      It really makes people wonder at my work when they asked for the 5555 and the box they got said 5550. That goes for most models of iPAQs.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    2. Re:Unique fingerprint reader? by dirkdidit · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, the models ending in five were the business channel devices. The models ending in zero were the consumer channel devices. According to HP, they did this to make tracking of where the devices were sold easier, even though the models were identical.

    3. Re:Unique fingerprint reader? by peawee03 · · Score: 1

      Methinks it was the other way around... I owned a h1915, which I got through Best Buy. Then again, HP may have started punting that numbering scheme around then as well.

      --
      I wish I could write clever and witty sigs.
  7. Re:NOTE by CK2004PA · · Score: 0
    Two things.

    1. I hope AC above me is joking

    2. Who cares about handhelds? Other than toys, do they really serve a purpose? Does anyone really use one and not a laptop instead?

    --
    "I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator"-Adolf Hitler or George W Bush?
  8. hosted on the iPAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They are also hosting it on the iPaq...

    1. Re:hosted on the iPAQ by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      If they were, it'd be running a lot better. Picoweb is a great little webserver. Small and fast. Doesn't script very well though. But because it's pulling it's pages from RAM, flash, or worst case scenario, microdrive it's really fast in comparison to a desktop box. Kind of like if you installed apache on a huge ramdrive.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  9. Halitosis by oskard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mine came with halitosis recognition. It only turns on for people with really bad breath. And THEN it does the fingerprint scan. Talk about security.

    --
    Sigs are for Terrorists.
    1. Re:Halitosis by CK2004PA · · Score: 0

      Not really. My guess is that the only people using fingerprint scanning handhelds will have halitosis anyway.

      --
      "I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator"-Adolf Hitler or George W Bush?
  10. Muddy PDA world by achacha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been trying to buy a PDA for a year and cannot find a PDA that has the features I need, every PDA has pros and cons, however the cons in almost every PDA make it a questionable buy. If you want to use the HP iPaq and have a phone plan you can only use TMobile which has horrible reception in my area, Cingular and Verizon offer their own versions but the PDAs they provide are very subpar and expensive to boot. Just with there was a great PDA avaialable with cellular provider of your choice, but that would be good for consumer and bad for the cellular companies...

    1. Re:Muddy PDA world by sahonen · · Score: 1

      Or you can just buy a separate cell phone and PDA. What's wrong with buying individual, specialized devices that are good at what they are specifically designed to do, instead of all-in-one devices that by definition have to be compromises?

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    2. Re:Muddy PDA world by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention it would really suck to have a car accident at the same time your palmtop battery was at 0 (my Nokia Cell phone has 72 hours of standby- my HP2215 can barely handle 5 hours of usage or 24 hours of standby)

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Muddy PDA world by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with buying individual, specialized devices that are good at what they are specifically designed to do, instead of all-in-one devices that by definition have to be compromises?

      Having to carry around 2 bulky devices instead of 1? OTOH, I wonder if Wi-Fi will eventually make carrying a cell phone around the city superfluous.

    4. Re:Muddy PDA world by sahonen · · Score: 1

      My cellphone isn't bulky, in fact it's downright tiny. Now I would find that having to hold a brick to my head to make a phone call would be more offensive than just carrying around a cell phone and a PDA, but that's just me.

      You're also ignoring the fact that a lot of the time, what you (or at least I) talk about on your cell phone is what's on your PDA. People call me to schedule me for freelance work, and my schedule is, of course, on my PDA. If the PDA was my cell phone, well, that would suck immensely.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    5. Re:Muddy PDA world by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      Yeah same here with the schedule. Given all the reported dangers, I was thinking of getting a Bluetooth headset.

    6. Re:Muddy PDA world by itsthebin · · Score: 1

      I went for the dell axim x50v , built in 802.11 and BT left a CF and SD/MMC free for other uses. screen and video chip are just a bonus. I have successfully called mobiles and landlines with skypeout and my jabra BT headset. my phone now ( veritable n-gage ) only has GPRS , which is useful to connect my axim to the internet. As EDGE become more available , and phones incorporate EDGE and become cheaper I will upgrade my phone. WM2003se is not the greatest OS , but it is acceptable.

      --
      ...I obey the laws of physics....
  11. Will there be by cainskltn · · Score: 1

    An improved screen? I mean if you're putting your fingers on it all the time, the screen could get pretty janky, and may not be able to read your fingerprint through all the crap and scratches. Or, bill/tom/dick/harry could get access with the fingerprint you left on the screen.

    1. Re:Will there be by oskard · · Score: 1

      Or even worse your finger itself could get janky from all the dust and scratches. And you'll never be recognized by a computer again....

      --
      Sigs are for Terrorists.
    2. Re:Will there be by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The fingerprint reader is separate from the screen- and the screen only works with a finger nail or some plastic, wood, or metal blunt object.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  12. A finger print reader ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  13. Dear Problems With Fingerprints by Letter · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Dear Problems With Fingerprints,

    There's much debate about whether fingerprints are the primary keys to human identity. Law enforcement has based over 100 years of work on the premise that no two humans, anywhere, ever, have the same fingerprints. Some people say this is hogwash. Let's leave out, for now, the fact that it's not possible to verify this claim at all: there's no way to test all living people and compare their prints. This is troubling, but a bit of a red herring. More troubling is the way fingerprinting is practiced. There's a case in Philly right now where a federal judge has prohibited the prosecution from testifying that two fingerprints "match" -- and Tom Ridge wants fingerprints added to U.S. passports. From this article:

    But in 1993, a Supreme Court decision required judges to take a more active role in deciding what scientific evidence to admit. In the case of fingerprints, the so-called "Daubert" guidelines would lead to questions such as: Has the practice of fingerprint identification been adequately tested? What's the error rate? Are there standards and controls?

    The answers, respectively, are "no," "no one knows," and "no."

    Letter

    1. Re:Dear Problems With Fingerprints by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Has the practice of fingerprint identification been adequately tested? What's the error rate? Are there standards and controls?

      Thank you for reminding me of a huge issue regarding fingerprints. You are correct and you bring up very valid points. Well done.

    2. Re:Dear Problems With Fingerprints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, what you say is true:

      There is no way to know whether two people can have identical fingerprints. Or even fingerprints not identical, but similar enough to fool a fingerprint expert. (Let's call this a "fingerprint collision" by analogy with a collision in a hash table, since we are all geeks here.)

      However, in all the decades that police departments have been using fingerprints, there has not been fingerprint collision shown. Fingerprints have been taken literally millions of times and no fingerprint collisions have been found.

      Even identical twins have different fingerprints!

      If anyone, anywhere, could prove a fingerprint collision, defense lawyers everywhere would grab that and wave it in court if the only evidence against their client was fingerprint evidence. Why hasn't this ever happened?

      Even if there were one fingerprint collision for every 1000 people, that would be a 99.9% success rate for fingerprints, and that would still be an awesome crime-solving tool. But since no collisions have been shown, I don't see how you can question this.

      Fingerprints aren't perfect. If the evidence print is smeared, or if they only manage to grab a partial print, the police might not have enough of a print for a clear match. And fingerprints are interpreted by humans, who can make mistakes.

      But in court, fingerprint experts don't testify "yeah, I guess it looks the same". They say something like "see this blowup of the evidence print, and see this blowup of the file print. Notice that I have circled ten different identical features (loop, whorl, arch, etc.) in ten different places and they all match. Therefore, by the standards, these fingerprints match."

      It might be interesting to fund a study to determine just how many features need to match before it's confirmed. But I don't think anyone has been convicted on the basis of a single partial fingerprint with only two matching features.

  14. This is useful by g4sy · · Score: 1
    This is the one upgrade that might make me ditch my m505 for a newer handheld....

    None of the other new features were attractive enough to get my attention.

    --
    somewhere, on a Big Red Sign:
    if(color==blue){speed--;}
    1. Re:This is useful by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      The Slashvertisement worked!

  15. I'm a luddite by jacobcaz · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I have tried - multiple times in the last 5 years - to switch to a PDA. I started with a Newton 100, upgraded to a Newton 110 then a 120. Finally I settled for about 2 years on a Newton 2100. Then I got a hand-me-down Pilot, I rushed to buy a Palm III when it first came out. I upgraded to a Palm V because it was sleek-n-sexy. I bought an HP iPaq 1945 because I had tried PalmOS and thought maybe PocketPC was for me. Now, even my phone has PDA capabilities!

    And I still use a $0.89 Mead Composition book (UPC #043100090236) for my daily to-do and I keep it tucked inside a small calendar to track my "appointments". Why? Because it's just easier for me to grab a pencil and scratch an entry down. I was never able to get the entry down quickly with a PDA (despite using Rosetta, Graphiti, Jot and Transcriber). It's just not fast enough for me. As a plus I also get to use some of my nice fountain pens, they are a joy to write with. The calendar folds out to the size of a comp book when open (9.75"x15") and gives me an easy view of my month or my week. Flipping forward and back is a cinch and takes no time at all. I always hated hunting for appointments and tasks on a PDA because I could only efficiently see one day at a time no matter what the platform (though the Newton did it best, but was the largest unit).

    If I drop it on the way to a meeting it doesn't break, and I don't have to worry about batteries running down at the worst possible moment. Plus the comp books are literally $0.89 and the Calendar was about $11.99 and is refillable.

    Sure, I can't play super break out or solitare or freecell, but I don't care. At work I'm there to work and when I'm someplace waiting I'm usually reading a paper or adding notes and "todo's" in my book. Or I just put the damn thing down and enjoy the environment I'm in. I don't miss the games.

    I've converted...back to paper for good I think. I'm not planning on rushing out and upgrading with the next generation of PDAs (unless Apple does another one). I'll save that money and buy another Pelican or Parker or Delta fountain pen instead.

    1. Re:I'm a luddite by sholden · · Score: 1

      But how do you play minesweeper during meetings?

    2. Re:I'm a luddite by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Feh, he already says he doesn't miss games.

      In defense of the PDA, I will mention full text search, alarms, backup, e-books.

      However, despite this, despite being a PDA fanatic myself, I must admit that I have, in a secret drawer, a beautiful notebook and fountain pen, that every so often I take out and look at regretfully.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    3. Re:I'm a luddite by routergod · · Score: 1
      I have to agree - I bought a Palm IIIx and then a first generation Handspring - but still ended up going back to a paper calendar and notepad within six months. I couldn't take notes fast enough with graphiti to not need a notepad in meetings - and trying to sketch designs just isn't feasible.

      I keep thinking about trying the lastest PDA, but I just don't think I'd use it past the first couple of months and given the price I could buy myself any number of nice foutain or rollerball pens (liquid ink is SO much nicer to write with than ball point gel).

      There may at some point be a PDA type device that does enough to get me back into it, but I haven't seen it yet. I'd want small (comfortably in shirt pocket), phone, decent screen, 801.11, and PocketPC functionality.

      Until then - I'll stick with paper - as you say it doesn't break when you (or the kids) drop it!

    4. Re:I'm a luddite by angle_slam · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I had a Palm (Clie, actually) but found that I never used it. But when my employer gave me a Blackberry, I realized that a PDA can be useful. Pushing email is rather Blackberry specific, but a lot of other features are available on other PDAs:
      • Syncing between computer address book and PDA. I have my full address book with me at all times. And if I add a new one, it automatically gets entered into the computer.
      • Writing notes to myself. I'm a bit ADD. If I wrote a reminder to myself, I'd probably forget about the note, much less what I wrote in the note. With the PDA, I can set an appointment or a task with the note. After I sync, Outlook (or whatever your PIM is) will remind me about it later.
      • Writing notes to myself for use outside of work. For example, I'll just type out a grocery list in Outlook, and get it synced to my Blackberry. No more wondering where my grocery list is.
      I think the best part of the Blackberry is the keyboard. When I had my Clie, I hated using Graffiti. The thumb keyboard is much more handy.
    5. Re:I'm a luddite by linuxtelephony · · Score: 1

      I'd have to ditto this sentimate. I get my composition book from Walmart, usually $0.87 or cheaper. And when you need ultra portability, there is a mini-composition book which fits in your pocket quite nicely. I love my fountain pens, and find I write a lot more frequently now that I've gone to pen and paper.

      I don't have the fold out calendar, I still use the computer for most appointments, but that's about it.

      My wife had a Clie for a while, the flip-n-twist model with the keyboard. She loved it. She upgrades about every year, has had two of them so far, and when it was time to buy her third, she found out Sony left (or was leaving) the US market and bought an Ipaq 4355 (w/the keyboard). Very useful PDA. The keyboard makes it.

      --
      . 62,400 repetitions make one truth -- Brave New World, Aldous Huxley
    6. Re:I'm a luddite by coopaq · · Score: 1
      And I still use a $0.89 Mead Composition book (UPC #043100090236) for my daily to-do and I keep it tucked inside a small calendar to track my "appointments".

      +5, Insightful?

      Maybe +5, Ignorant.

      Who tries to replace a pad of paper with a $500 PC.

      If that's all you wanted then it was dumb to try it in the first place. Nevermind 16 times as you claim.

      "It isn't just a tip calculator!" - Jerry Seinfeld

  16. Here is my question about biometric fingerprinting by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    on mobile devices. These devices can get tussled about a decent amount, what happens if the device breaks? Do you have to pay for an expensive repair just to get access to your files?

  17. Pocket PC's are dead by Szentigrade · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just read a recent report that said smartphones with pocket PC capabilities, sale numbers rose an average of 120% while smartphones have only gained about 6% growth. IMO pocket PC's wont be around much longer, it just makes more sense to include the features in cellphones, i really dont want to pay $300+ for somthing im most likely going to keep notes and addresses in. And i think its clear which side the public is on. Death to pocket PC's, long live the smartphone!

    --
    When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up... reading.-Henny Youngman
    1. Re:Pocket PC's are dead by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      While that report may be true- I personally would want the devices separate, but linked. To that end, when my next phone contract is up in march, I'll be getting a bluetooth enabled phone. The PocketPCs do a hell of a lot more than just keep notes and addresses- just take a look at the bundled software list sometime. And while it certainly is nice to have a "convergence" device, PocketPCs with color, backlit screens on quite a bit, just don't have the battery strength I'd want in a cell phone (my cell phone should have at LEAST 48 hours standby- my PocketPC is lucky to get 5 hours usage out of a battery before recharging).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Pocket PC's are dead by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Every smartphone I've used has been a pile of shit.

      I have a Kyocera 7135 with Palm OS. Sometimes it crashes when the phone rings, you go to answer it and see "seg fault" and the thing frozen up.

      The battery life is absolute shit. I'll charge it all day at my office, leave today about 6PM, and the battery will be nearly dead by the time I get in tomorrow at 9(ish).

      For the first couple of days I had fun playing with it. But realistically, it's not useful for anything. I write notes and schedule on paper, and I carry a little black book since not even the fucking phone directory works right.

      Oh, and the phone "application" can't use the touch screen. Well, it can, but it wont. If you touch the screen, a modal dialog (meaning you cant do anything, even answer the phone) will pop up telling you you cant touch the screen. You have to clear it with the undersized OK button.

      Jack of all trades, master of none.

      Besides, people want tiny cell phones (razor phones), and they want big bright hi-res screens on their PDAs (VGA or higher).

      They also want a keyboard option, or at least enough touchpad surface to be able to form letters, another gripe I have with my phone.

      Even if I got the hang of graffiti, there's a scratchpad about the size of a pygmy's thumbnail
      on which to form the letters. Absolutely uselsss.

      I can't get it to behave as a wireless modem for my laptop for the life of me, hell it's nearly impossible to do anything 'net enabled with it. This is probably more a criticism of Verizon than Kyocera, but who knows. My point is, my boss pissed away 650 bucks per employee for these things, thinking they'd be useful to a bunch of techies who are constantly travelling. I'm the only one still using it, being too poor to replace it on my own dime.

      Nah, if you want a shitty camera, a shitty phone, a shitty pda, and a shitty gaming platform, buy a "next-gen" N-Gage. Me, I can't wait until this thing dies, and they discontinue it, so I can expense out a real phone that actually makes phone calls, and a real "Personal Digital Assistant" that actually assists in doing stuff.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Pocket PC's are dead by f()rK()_Bomb · · Score: 1

      Your .sig quote is actually

      When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading.

      and can be attributed to Henny Youngman. Please dont pass off others work as your own

      --
      "The space elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing." - Arthur C. Clarke ~1980
    4. Re:Pocket PC's are dead by hobbs · · Score: 2, Insightful
      recent report that said smartphones with pocket PC capabilities, sale numbers rose an average of 120% while smartphones have only gained about 6% growth .... Death to pocket PC's, long live the smartphone!

      Do you see the basic fallacy in these remarks? The part that makes the phone smart is the PDA capabilities, and whatever report you cited specifically mentioned PocketPCs, so there is no death for PocketPC as a platform.

      Also, how much longer before the thumbprint reader is included on smartphones to enable access to them (although I'm sure it's already been done ...)? Also, I have a Skype client on my non-phone PocketPC device, which has built-in wifi. Where do you place that?

    5. Re:Pocket PC's are dead by Szentigrade · · Score: 1

      I read it in a chain E-mail and thats the way it was written. It didnt have an authors name next to it but im sure it was from the same quote you are writing about. But since the words are different does that not make it a different "quote"? Also i never claimed that i wrote it, so don't tell me im "passing others work as my own", it was an honest mistake. however i like the actual quote better, im going to change it to that, thank you for pointing it out.

      --
      When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up... reading.-Henny Youngman
  18. $500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    and it even has a better screen than the Mac Mini.

  19. In the age of the budget PC by digitalgimpus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When will these things become a bit lower in price?

    It's either clean out my wallet... or get a dinky cheap PDA.

    At least with cell phones the price may be super inflated... but at least they get subsidized with a plan.

    Perhaps it's time for 802.11b hotspot providers to subsidize PDA's? Get a plan for 2 years, and get a cheaper PDA?

    Most likely would get geeky PDA's in more consumer hands... more customers.

    1. Re:In the age of the budget PC by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, instead of worrying about it, why don't you just spam slashdot with some lame-assed "free iPaq" ponzi scheme?

      Fuck you and your "free mac mini" offer.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:In the age of the budget PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey man, im signing up under your free mac mini link. I got my free ipod back in september so I know gratis works. Once I get my referrals ill complete an offer, good luck to both of us! =P

    3. Re:In the age of the budget PC by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Why not just go for a TMobile HP 6xxx model? Then you get it subsidized AND a cell phone AND a PDA.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:In the age of the budget PC by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

      I got my iPod... with virtually no effort.

      So it does work.

      You ended up being the looser on that deal.

      If you really want to know the details, they are here.

      IMHO "Software Licensing" is more of a "scheme"

    5. Re:In the age of the budget PC by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Except you become one of the spammers everyone loathes.

      Fuck you and your "free bullshit" marketing scams.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  20. Butt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well mine came with Butt recognition. It only turns on for people who leave it in their back pocket. And THEN it does the fingerprint scan. Talk about security.

  21. Sheesh by mg2 · · Score: 0, Troll

    If people would just keep a closer eye on their stuff, we wouldn't have to do retina scans while we put our fingers onto biometric panels and licked a strip of electrodes.

    Personally, I think if you have things on your iPAQ that you want to protect so badly, then you should try a little fucking harder to take care of it.

  22. Re:NOTE by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1
    2) I use my HP 2215 INSTEAD of a laptop. It's far easier to carry around, I've added on GPS and WiFi, and a Scott-E-Vest to make it wearable. My next one will definately be a 2755 as I love the idea of the flip-top screen cover, even if it does get fingerprints.

    Pluses for me over a laptop:

    PIM information is more available (I've yet to see a laptop that wakes up 15 minutes before an appointment, or one that you'd WANT to carry with you everywhere you go).

    Small keyboard (yep, I've got the microthumbboard) is easier to use in cramped conditions, like plane, restroom, bus, or train.

    Synchronization- I'm sure there's a way to get the laptop to do this, but it's nice to be able just to grab the thing out of the cradle and know I've got the same e-mail, contacts, calendar and todo list as my desktop machine (and part of the web too- Avantgo and rsssync mean that pieces of the web get copied to the device locally).

    Having said that, big negatives that the laptop does better include:

    More hard drive space- I do have a hitachi 2GB on there but I'm always running out.

    Screen resolution- for many applications, especially Acrobat Reader, QVGA just is very very small at only 320x240.

    All in all, though, I'm satisfied- and use mine every day.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  23. Re:Make IPaq BIOS Open Source! by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

    Hewlett-Packard not Picard. Close though.

    I doubt source will be released since it uses Microsoft Pocket PC.

    --
    How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  24. Security, eh? by sebFlyte · · Score: 1

    Am i the only one to whom the idea of a device you hold having a fingerprint reader for security seems a little... silly?

    --
    "Nothing can shake my belief that this world is the fruit of a dark god whose shadow I extend." - Emil Michel Cioran
    1. Re:Security, eh? by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

      Don't knock it 'till you've tried it. My iPaq 545x can be held in the palm leaving the thumb free for swiping. Do it all the time.

      And to those complaining about leaving prints on the screen... the scanner isn't on the screen. It's the white bar below the 4-way "joystick".

      -MrLogic

    2. Re:Security, eh? by sebFlyte · · Score: 1

      I think you miss my point. I'm suggesting fingerprint scanners on devices like this would be the same as having your password written all over them...

      --
      "Nothing can shake my belief that this world is the fruit of a dark god whose shadow I extend." - Emil Michel Cioran
  25. Maybe if Taco had a dup finder for his PDA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We wouldn't be seeing what is largely a dup of a Jan 5th Slashdot Article...

  26. Re:Here is my question about biometric fingerprint by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    If all you need is access- I've used Activesync to back up files from a PocketPC with a broken screen. From the looks of the fingerprint reader, it's a good deal more robust than the screen (which is very much the most fragile piece of any PDA). But I'd assume, based on my experience, that Activesync would continue to be able to sync to/from the device, if you could turn it on at all.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  27. Anyone else read: by doombob · · Score: 1

    HP's New iPAC h4x0r3d

  28. My question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you doing with your PDA in the bathroom anyway?

    1. Re:My question... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      "What are you doing with your PDA in the bathroom anyway?"

      The average human wastes about 6-8 months of their life on the toilet; I prefer to use that time reading, answering e-mail, or browsing. That portion of my body is rather automatic- it doesn't take a lot of brain power to take a shit, so I need some form of entertainment. Why not use the time wisely? Of course, it's more convient at home, where I've got the WiFi network to keep me connected.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:My question... by peawee03 · · Score: 1

      That's the best reply ever.

      And I also use my PDA as my laptop; my HP zd7000 is just wayyy to damn big to carry around

      --
      I wish I could write clever and witty sigs.
  29. Limited use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought mine because being a nursing student I thought I'd have ample use for a pocket computer. Carry my drug guide, assessment cheat sheets, care plans, record patient vitals, set alarms for meds, etc, etc...

    But there's no real substitute for having a good memory and a notepad. My PDA locks up, the transcriber input is at times laughable, and people generally look down their nose at me for using it. It's big (Audiovox Thera) and cumbersome to carry in a scrub pocket. Plus when the patient barfs, bleeds, or shits all over me the PDA has to be cleaned...

  30. Won't always work though by panurge · · Score: 1
    Fingerprint recognition can only be a backup to an alternative login method. After a heavy weekend of DIY or on my boat, I suspect my fingerprints are at least temprarily degraded beyond recognition. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

    But in any case in my last pda evaluation I once again ran up against an annoyance factor that doesn't go away. I do not like Windows for PDAs, in any shape or form. I like Palm OS much more. But Palm make it hugely difficult to change the battery, even though the basic battery is just an ordinary LiIon. Why? Even the T5, which has flash memory and so can survive battery change, has a battery that requires watch-like dismantling to change. I do not like relying on a device which is only as reliable as a nonexchangeable battery.

    HP is surely big enough to make it possible to run their PDAs on either OS. Even if it was a buy-time decision, I would rather have an HP PDA that ran Palm OS than any form of fingerprint recognition.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Won't always work though by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Fingerprint recognition can only be a backup to an alternative login method. After a heavy weekend of DIY or on my boat, I suspect my fingerprints are at least temprarily degraded beyond recognition. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

      You're not wrong. A friend of mine is a carpenter, and was an early adopter of the HP5545- never did get the damned fingerprint reader to read his heavily scared thumb the same way twice. I finally advised him that if he wanted to use security, to use the numeric PIN method instead....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Won't always work though by peawee03 · · Score: 1

      I run Familiar linux on my h3800, with the Opie environment. It combines everything I liked about PocketPC (the PIM apps, mainly) with everything I liked about PalmOS (interface & stability) with a healthy toss in from Linux (GPL'ed software in droves). It has it's own quirks, but if you have an officially supported PDA, release 0.8 oughta "just work". And, it's binary compatible with Debian on ARM and the Sharp Zaurus. Sure, the screen is small, but with a folding keyboard it's enough to do almost anything. Disclaimer for those using more current versions of PalmOS than what came with the Palm IIxe: I don't know what current PalmOS PIM apps can do, I can only compare to my IIIxe

      As not to sound like a Familiar fanboy, there are certian things that have irked me about it. The install process can be tricky. It involves installing a new bootloader, which normally goes alright (but if it fails, you've just "bricked" the ipaq. Compaq fixed them for free, don't know about current HP policy). However, when flashing the actual OS, sometimes things goof apparently... upon reflashing to upgrade from Familiar 0.7.2 to 0.8, something messed up, and my wlan kernel modules were wonky, as well as suspend (i.e.- it didn't.) I reflashed it, and it works perfectly. Also, some apps just don't work right, from either bugs or poor configuration (such as konqueror-embedded not being compiled with ssl support... come on, is it that big of a deal?)

      The single best thing about it though, is being able to use vim on the damn thing. Who cares about note taking software when you have vim? ;)

      --
      I wish I could write clever and witty sigs.
  31. This is old and has been old twice already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    two reviews in less than a month on the same HP model. Guess what, I will NOT buy it. Also, I have had a fingerprint reader on my Ipaq for over three years now, so fingerprint readers on Ipaqs or other PDA's are not new. What would be new is if Taco reads what he posts.

  32. Re:Make IPaq BIOS Open Source! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Only to people who have already spent the ~$2000 to subscribe to MSDN- for them the source is available because every damned version of Windows CE is vendor tweaked from an SDK provided by Microsoft.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  33. I'll bite by Crag · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can't easily synchronize a Mead notepad with your central database over a wireless connection in a coffee shop.

    You can't do an automatic search-and-replace on a notepad.

    You can't write in various computer languages and then have the notepad render or compile the language to its target format(s). Think web design, for example.

    You can't passphrase-protect your notepad.

    The notepad has zero levels of undo.

    The question is not whether a PDA is useful, but whether the uses it has are ones you want when you're away from a regular computer. If not, that doesn't make you a ludite any more than not driving in a metropolitan city does.

  34. Everything should go on the phone.. BUT by Metroid72 · · Score: 1

    We're still ways to go in battery technology.

    I actually have a friend that carries 2 phones, one is the latest and greatest palm based one and the other is a regular phone and he switches the smart chip between both.

    I personally want a phone that just works and has a long battery life. No color displays, no pictures, just signal strength, clarity, battery life and portability.

    Once we make progress and we can store contacts, appointments and sync by just being close to our bluetooth PC then we'll be ready.

    Meanwhile...let's just wait and see

  35. Is MiniMAN related to MiniME ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    I mean, is he a little person? That'd be sooo kewl.

    Oh, and can it run Linux? Clustered with a beowolf ?

    What's a beowolf ?

  36. Re:Here is my question about biometric fingerprint by opusman · · Score: 1

    You have to cut off your finger and send it in with the device for repair.

  37. My P900 by samjam · · Score: 1

    My P900 has >72 hours standby time and does everything I'd use an IPAQ for including note taking, voice recorder, web browsing (Opera), email, games, calendar, address book.

    Oh, and its a phone.

    Sam

    1. Re:My P900 by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but does it run PocketXML? Or mobile .NET? :-) Seriously though- the IPAQs have all the battery life of a full sized laptop- nothing good in that arena at all.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  38. Pocket PC capabilities... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Do you see the basic fallacy in these remarks? The part that makes the phone smart is the PDA capabilities, and whatever report you cited specifically mentioned PocketPCs, so there is no death for PocketPC as a platform.

    The report mentioned "Pocket PC Capabilities", which I take as code for "Blackbery and Treo rich devices".

    I do know that around my workplace, Blackberries are almost standard now.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  39. Does it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it run Linux?

  40. Treo 650 has swappable battery by Nonesuch · · Score: 1
    But in any case in my last pda evaluation I once again ran up against an annoyance factor that doesn't go away. I do not like Windows for PDAs, in any shape or form. I like Palm OS much more. But Palm make it hugely difficult to change the battery, even though the basic battery is just an ordinary LiIon. Why? Even the T5, which has flash memory and so can survive battery change, has a battery that requires watch-like dismantling to change. I do not like relying on a device which is only as reliable as a nonexchangeable battery.
    The new Treo 650 has a swappable battery (1800 mAh, $50), switching batteries is just like a cell phone; push a latch, pull off the back panel, swap it out.

    Data will not be lost while the battery is out, the 650 uses NVRAM. Just like a cell phone, you can't maintain an active call or data connection with the battery out :)

  41. iPAQ - TRUSTED COMPUTING! by Alsee · · Score: 1
    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  42. Don't lose it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I drop it on the way to a meeting it doesn't break, and I don't have to worry about batteries running down at the worst possible moment.

    And if you lose it, there is no backup. Since it's working for you, go ahead and do that... but PDAs do have some advantages over paper, it isn't all one-way.

    I'll never forget the classified ad I saw:

    LOST: my DayTimer. Help! My whole life is in there! $50 reward!

  43. Re:Here is my question about biometric fingerprint by ricky-road-flats · · Score: 1

    If it fails the fingerprint reader more than a few times (5 I seem to remember) then you are asked to answer the secret question you set when you teach it your fingerprint.

  44. Legally Blind-up Tech creek with out a display. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PDA's are a wast of time for the disabled. I have low vision and am dyslexic. I could really use a PDA. Most cell phones are almost useless to the disabled and eldderly as well with tiny butons and text. Yes the displays keep geting bigger but the text is geiiting smaller. I nead at least 24-30 point type size to read. Hay Motorola and Palm wake the $$$$ UP.