Slashdot Mirror


KDE 3.4 goes Beta

wikinerd writes "KDE 3.4 has reached its beta testing phase. The KDE 3.4beta1 is codenamed 'Krokodile' and pre-compiled packages are already available for Slackware, but if you need to compile it by yourself first check its compilation requirements."

37 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. Anti-aliased fonts by Lindsay+Lohan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Re: the KDE 3.4 Compilation Requirements...

    I would categorize the X Render Extension as recommended as opposed to optional. Aren't anti-aliased fonts a basic feature of any modern desktop environment?

    1. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by green+pizza · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Aren't anti-aliased fonts a basic feature of any modern desktop environment?
      If you have the CPU power, sure. But there are those of us that want to run the latest software on older existing hardware. I generally forgo AA on everything except for my semi-modern main PC at home. The machines at work, at the church, and my older PCs suffer too much of a hit when I use AA.

    2. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by MrHanky · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Are you sure this has much to do with CPU power? I use xrender AA on my Powerbook G3 266 MHz (running Debian Sid), and it's far from shockingly slow. If I have to guess, I'd say it's because the ATI graphics chipset (Mach64, i think) is moderately well supported.

      And of course, if you haven't tried xrender on the machines lately, you could test it again. Xrender has improved a bit since it was introdused some years ago.

    3. Re:Anti-aliased fonts by mczak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, if you have a supported graphic card, AA fonts can be quite fast. The dri supported radeons (meaning everything from original radeon 7000 up to 9250 and all radeon igp except the brand-new of the xpress 200 chipset) for instance have render acceleration, which can speed up aa font rendering up by a factor of 10 or more.
      This particular driver doesn't support (accelerated) subpixel hinting, though.

  2. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kall me when there's a release kandidate.

    1. Re:Meh by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 3, Funny

      You forgot to leave your gnumber!

  3. Excited about KDE 3.4 by green+pizza · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm looking forward to giving 3.4 a try. Why? Because on my modest hardware it seems like Qt has gotten faster over the past 2 years while GTK2 has gotten slower.

    1. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, no. If every GTK+ application on my system has a noticable delay even opening a menu, yet all the Qt applications are fine, that's a problem with the toolkit.

      I think it's pretty arrogant for you to call somebody "confused" for observing that GTK+ 2.0 is quite slow. Even fans of that toolkit admit that 2.0 is quite a bit slower than 1.x.

    2. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by tpgp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm looking forward to giving 3.4 a try. Why? Because on my modest hardware it seems like Qt has gotten faster over the past 2 years while GTK2 has gotten slower.

      Why has this piece of flamebait been modded informative?

      Try and say something about KDE 3.4, the story, or KDE's speed in general.

      A post comparing old versions of KDE to old versions of GTK is a troll. A pathetic one at that.

      --
      My pics.
    3. Re:Excited about KDE 3.4 by Jason+Hood · · Score: 2, Informative

      So you really have no basis to make this claim? Saying that GTK is "great" seems like you really dont know what the differences are in the rendering methodology of the two.

      If you knew the frameworks that drive these to graphics engines, you would know that Qt is far more advanced. Qt Faster? probably but its apples and oranges. GTK more usable? Sure is but that comes at a price.

      --
      Are you intolerant of intolerant people?
  4. Screenshots? by schnits0r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are there any screenshots of this? What does it look like? Is it pretty? Does it have new features both usably, and visually?

    1. Re:Screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      plastik as the default style
      SVG wallpapers now possible
      kicker refactored and with a new cool animation
      kdm now themeable
      experimental traslucency windows
      HAL support
      little polishing on the menus
      ability to download and install new themes directly from the desktop
      trash applet in kicker and trash, media, settings kioslaves
      kpdf almost completely rewritten
      emoticons in kmail
      systemtray icon hiding in kicker

      still, too many icons on the konqueror toolbar. luckily it doesn't take too much time to remove them. but it should be the default..
      anyway, 3.4 is gonna be one of the best kde releases ever.

    2. Re:Screenshots? by ballwall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With every project I've worked on it work, I've slowly learned that regardless of how sophisticated a piece of software is, or how elegant the design is, or how reliable, the response from the PHB is always one of two things:

      "Wow, that looks great"
      or
      "Oh, ok."

      If it doesn't look clean or cool or have little moving clickable things people just aren't impressed.

  5. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by CajunArson · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not that bad on Gentoo. I mean, I have a mid-range P4 system that will spend roughly 6 hours compiling a full KDE install even with all the crap that I could forgo but don't bother to. As long as I'm not trying to play a 3D game or anything I can still get work done without any hassles.
    Hey, I bet all the guys who have Athlon-64's will chime in now about how they get done compiling before they even have the packages downloaded :)

    --
    AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
  6. oh crap... by myowntrueself · · Score: 4, Funny

    just when you thought debian sarge was going to go stable some time this year...

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  7. KDE 4.0... by Jameth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm actually most excited because this means that, in not too long, people will start really working on KDE 4.0. That's the release I want. 3.4 is a finalization of the 3's, really. It's got some nice cleanup of what's there and will run a little better, but almost all the features that were ever going into the 3's are already there.

    But 4.0...oh, I can hardly wait...

    1. Re:KDE 4.0... by Galahad2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you're wondering, here is a feature plan for 4.0.

    2. Re:KDE 4.0... by chill · · Score: 4, Informative

      KDE changes major number when they break binary backwards compatibility.

      The major change will be the move to QT4. KDE major release numbers match QT major release numbers.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:KDE 4.0... by Mornelithe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, that's hardly a complete list. Most developers aren't thinking about KDE 4.0 yet, because they're working on KDE 3.4. Once 3.4 is released, and all the stuff from the 3.4 feature plan that couldn't be completed is pushed to the 4.0 plan, and everyone makes their new forecasts for 4.0, you can then comment on the amount of new features.

      KDE 4.0 will be based off of Qt 4.0, so that's already a major jump right there, and it means that things like pluggable rendering backends including an OpenGL backend will be included, at some point at least. KDE 4.0 will have significant differences from 3.x.

      --

      I've come for the woman, and your head.

  8. Masive i18n by Forge · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Notice how the translations are larger than everything else combined ?

    That I partially reflects the share number of languages available. It also shows how modular KDE's design is. I.e. You can strip out everything language dependent into a separate package without breaking the rest. (Yes, it compiles in English without the i18n package).

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  9. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't see a pro debian slant to that site, only poking fun at gentoo zealots. In my opinion, there are four types of linux users. Gentoo zealots, Debian zealots, Linux zealots, and everyone else. You are obviously a Gentoo zealot because Gentoo zealtots think everyone who isn't a Gentoo zealot is a Debian zealot, because in your world there is only source vs rpm.

  10. KDE by TechnologyX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Say what you want about KDE, but after playing with 3.3, I finally made the switch from GNOME to KDE. I especially like the level of integration in between apps, the transparency settings for menus and applications, and KDevelop. Gnome is awesome too, especially 2.8, but KDE just seems to have more polish to it.

    --
    Slashdot sucks
  11. You hadn't heard? by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Debian's auto-release script is hard-wired to a Brownian Motion Vector Plotter and a realy hot cup of tea. The release after next will be out sometime last year.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  12. Re:If you need to Kompile it yourself... by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh okay, I gotcha. Sorry for the gentoo rant then.

    They probably do it because the people using are testers and this way they can find more bugs.

  13. Nonsense. by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can start a compile of kdelibs, kdebase, kdenetwork, kdepim, kdegraphics, and kdeoffice, on my modest XP 1800, let it run overnight, and I have a new desktop in the morning.

    It is called *multitasking*. You can do other things with the computer while it is compiling you know.

  14. Re:Features? by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, it has features and bugfixes. Oh, you wanted to know which ones!!! Well, why didn't you say so? I haven't the faintest.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  15. Re:Obligatory "K" thread. by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 4, Funny
    The next 17000 versions will be named:
    perl -ne "print if s/^c(.*)/k\1/;" < /usr/share/dict/words
    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  16. Just remember... by jd · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't download the pre-release marked "krakatoa"

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  17. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Ironically, Debian doesn't really use RPM, it uses deb packages.

    I don't even want to know what Gentoo zealots things of Fedora and Mandrake users (by which I mean those us with better things to do than compile packages all day).

  18. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by IdleTime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a Gentoo user of nearly 3 years, I have no special thoughts about Debian, RedHat, Mandrake or other distro's users. I'm sure they are all fine people and enjoy their distributions just as much as I enjoy Gentoo.

    --
    If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  19. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well you see, that right there is what makes you NOT a Gentoo zealot. It relegates to the much more sensible ranks of fan, advocate, or promoter.

  20. Ich bin Schnappi das kleine Krokodil by Brandybuck · · Score: 3, Funny

    If this release is named "Krokodile", I think the default startup music should be "Schnappi!"

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  21. autospellcheck on kate? by sewagemaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    does anyone have any luck with autospellcheck (spellcheck as you type, red underlining of words if you make a spelling mistake) in kate? They were saying that this was going to be released in 3.2 but it doesnt seem to be there. bugs.kde.org has closed the wishlist/feature request ticket. I'm using 3.3.1 currently. The feature's there in konqueror, kmail and kword, but for us folks that use kile (which depends on kate) as the LaTeX source editor, we would sure find it a good feature to have.

  22. Re:Compile it? Yeah, right. by swillden · · Score: 2, Funny

    As a Gentoo user of nearly 3 years, I have no special thoughts about Debian, RedHat, Mandrake or other distro's users. I'm sure they are all fine people and enjoy their distributions just as much as I enjoy Gentoo.

    I see that Gentoo zealots have moved to an entirely new level of rabid fanboyism. Recognizing that the blatant, in-your-face evangelism approach has done all it can, you're now starting down a new path, subtly working away at our resistance through calm, rational and even apparently tolerant discussion... all the better to enhance the shock effect of your next frontal assault.

    But we're wise to you, oh, yes. The evil will not take our machines, sapping their cycles with endless compilation. We will hold our Debian swirls high and beat back the honeyed words just like the bombastic venom they so cleverly disguise.

    Or maybe we'll just cave and buy a faster machine.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  23. Re:DBUS ? by Brandybuck · · Score: 3, Informative

    Huh? I use KDE on FreeBSD, and I can unmount a USB drive in about a tenth of a second with one mouse click. Under Windows (XP) it usually takes me ten or more seconds and four mouse clicks. Sometimes, maybe one in twenty, it takes up to a couple of minutes to unmount with the entire system frozen in the meantime. And this is the system everyone says Unix should emulate? No fscking way!

    p.s. DBUS may or may not be a good idea, I haven't looked into it closely. But I'm not expecting any performance increases from it, because that's not what it is. If you have problem with DCOP, then blame your distro for shoddy integration.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  24. Qt4 by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Qt4 is a really major change. It is most definitely non-trivial to port code to Qt4, even with the Qt3 compatiblity libraries.

    As someone facing the need to port their code to Qt4 sometime in the coming year, I'm all too aware of this.

    I wouldn't expect a Qt4 based KDE in any hurry. Even if they're already porting to the Qt4 beta, I expect it'll take them a fair darn while even after Qt4 stable comes out before they can put together a Qt4 desktop. Even then, I'll be surprised if some apps don't continue to use Qt3 for a while after that.

  25. Most of the magic is in Qt by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The really impressive translation magic is in Qt's i18n tools ( QObject::tr(), lupdate, lrelease, etc). It "just works" - you code your app in English, but mark strings as translatable and translators can translate your app using external files generated from the source that can be distributed separately.

    It's fantastic.

    Sure, there's more work involved in making external resources like HTML help translatable, but the real magic happens in Qt.