Slashdot Mirror


Intelsat Loses Another Satellite

Alarash writes "Intelsat reported a few days ago that its IS-804 Satellite is lost in space. According to the press release, the '[...] satellite experienced a sudden and unexpected electrical power system anomaly on January 14, 2005, at approximately 5:32 p.m. EST that caused the total loss of the spacecraft.' The satellite was in charge of the South Pacific's media delivery. As a reminder, Intelsat-7, another satellite from Intelsat, got lost a couple of months ago."

16 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. Conspiracy! by mOoZik · · Score: 4, Funny

    This seems too consistent to be a random failure. Wasn't there some sort of a mystery as to what caused the last one? I propose that the satellites are slowly being hijacked and will soon be used against us, a la Independence Day! They'll collectively broadcast crappy reality shows to every corner of the world and none of us would be able to stop them! AHH! AHHHH!

    1. Re:Conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Some say this has already happened.

  2. Maybe the other one called ? by Maavin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Could it be that Intelsat-7 found something interesting while being AWOL and called his friend to come and see it, too ?

    --


    Crivens! I kicked meself in me own heid!
  3. I for one . . . Nah, no I don't by CharonIDRONES · · Score: 3, Funny

    *puts on tin foil hat*
    I'm safe, right?
    RIGHT?!
    Run for the hills! AAHH!
    *becomes another insane /.er living in the hills with a tin foil hat on*

    1. Re:I for one . . . Nah, no I don't by PornMaster · · Score: 3, Funny

      BARMAN: What, isn't there anything we can do?

      FORD: No, nothing.

      BARMAN: Well, I always though we were to lie down and put a
      paper bag over our head or something.

      FORD: If you like, yes.

      BARMAN: Well, will that help?

      FORD: No. Excuse me, I've got to find my friend.

  4. Re:Conspiracy Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can only think of ONE group that has both the motive and means to cut off our communications and that is

  5. Perhaps they should have used AMDsat by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or even Cyrixsat... altough that would have probably overheated long before now :)

  6. Poll options by eclectro · · Score: 5, Funny


    1) Solar Flux
    2) Those darn Russians
    3) Sensor installed upside down
    4) Kids with laser pointers
    5) Meteorite
    6) Tax purposes
    7) Unfriendly UFO
    8) Overheating
    9) Autodestruct after two-weeks of reruns

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  7. Another satellite down? by node+3 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do I have to do everything around here?

    Just a moment while I get my old PowerBook so I can upload the virus to the alien ship.

    Bastards keep trying to take them over so they can communicate around the Earth (they traveled like 6 million light-years to get here and they didn't know the Earth was round?).

    Does this affect my broadband connection? Noooo. I don't even know why I bother...

  8. This picture just in... by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  9. Re:Conspiracy Theory by maxwell+demon · · Score: 4, Funny
    I can only think of ONE group that has both the motive and means to cut off our communications and that is

    Since you don't tell what goup it is, I'll have to guess. The fact that you post as AC and finally decided not to post it anyway strongly suggests you actually meant

    THE SLASHDOT CROWD

    Yes, that makes sense. After all, the slashdot crowd is well known of killing web servers (the so-called slashdot effect). They use a site tarned as "news for nerds, stuff that matters" to efficiently communicate the targeted servers for the DDoS attacks. It's only a logical next step from killing websites to killing satellites. Therefore everyone on slashdot is suspect. Oh, wait ...
    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  10. Where to look by dave-tx · · Score: 5, Funny
    Just keep an eye out on ebay - like all "missing" merchandise, it'll show up eventually. Shipping charges will be a bitch, though.

    --

    >> "What would the robut do? Frame someone!"

  11. Sunspots by dj245 · · Score: 3, Funny
    IS-804 Satellite is lost in space.

    Danger, Danger IS-804!

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  12. Re:Who are Intelsat? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

    From Wikipedia: Intelsat maintains it headquarters in Bermuda
    Bermuda? And then anyone wonders that their satellites disappear?

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  13. Outsourcing bid by still+cynical · · Score: 3, Funny

    They're just trying to prove that the private sector can do what NASA does for less money. This was just proof-of-concept. For the full demo they'll slam another one into a planet.

    --
    Ignorance is the root of all evil.
  14. Not an Explanation by maggard · · Score: 4, Funny
    It's reasonably likely that Metal Whiskers can.
    No, it's not likely, reasonably or otherwise.

    "Metal whiskers", vacuum deposition, etc. are well recognized issues in satellite construction. After a few thousand birds at many millions a pop the industry is quite savvy about avoiding these.

    The impending EU ban on lead in consumer products has no effect on the satellite industry (they're exempt; Li'l Jr. is unlikely to be teething on Intelsat 9008b and most of it's components aren't off-the-shelf but specialized radiation-hardened product runs).

    But thank you for reading the previous /. story on this and now trendily applying it to everything trying to sound knowledgable.

    "My code won't compile" " Metal whiskers! "

    "My candidate lost!" " Metal whiskers! "

    "Erectile dysfuntion" (all together now) " Metal whiskers! "

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.