Slashdot Mirror


Taking My Freedom With Me to China?

Solo Han asks: "I'm considering a move to China next year, and while I have just as many problems as y'all do with the government, I still like the freedoms afforded me, especially when it comes to access of information. Chinese citizens, however, do not have the same freedoms, as we are constantly reminded here on slash-o-dot. Pr0n, mp3z, and games aside, what are the things that those of you in the Celestial Kingdom know you cannot access, and specifically, what are the websites, search engines, news sites, and other sites that are classed as potentially 'dangerous' material? This brings me to my overall question: is the censorship that real, that hard to get around, and how do you do it? What methods and technologies are you aware of or use to circumvent the Great Firewall of China?"

100 of 1,392 comments (clear)

  1. Well... by rackhamh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nothing for you to see here. Please move along.

    Does that answer your question?

    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I visited and found I had internet access to everything I needed. However, I had VPN access so there is a good chance I might have simply missed something completely because I was using my US server.(Because RDP is much less latency sensitive so the Terminal Server connection was faster for surfing US websites than a typical browser)

      Regardless, I found the place to be a blast, but I have to admit you do tend to stay on you best behavior because you constantly bump into police with very large automatic weapons.

    2. Re:Well... by rackhamh · · Score: 3, Funny

      Off-topic? You must be joking. Okay, maybe you're not, so let me run it down for you...

      We're talking about censorship.

      I clicked on the article and got the message, "Nothing for you to see here. Please move along" -- which, if you have half a brain, you know is a phrase commonly used when people are trying to hide or cover up something.

      Therefore perfectly relevant and (IMO, though others may disagree), kind of humorous.

      Honestly, didn't you have a better use for those moderator points?

    3. Re:Well... by Stargoat · · Score: 5, Informative
      I just came back from China. Internet sucks, particularly outside of Beijing and Shanghai. Daily access to life, such as going where you want to go is not bad, until you run into government officials. The communists will make your life hell. Simple things, like sending knives through the mail, are impossible to do. If they come to your house, even though you legally bought it, that butcher knife you use to cut your meat is illegal.

      Basically, if they want to get you, they will find something to get you. Behave yourself. Not for your sake, but for that of your friends and any relatives you may have. If you are ABC (and you know what that means if you are), this goes double. What they might not do to whites, they will do to ABC.

      Be prepared to stand in line for any government business. Also, any privacy you think you might be entitled to at a bank is non-existent. If you are white, you may complain about hospitality and get a little bit of space. If you are ABC, fugetabotit.

      You'll lose 25 pounds in two weeks. Be prepared for that. You'll probably also catch a cold your first week there.

      Speaking of cold, everyone wears a jacket all the time. It's a cold winter over there right now. Expect to be cold most of the time. Thick blue jeans from Walmart or Farm & Fleet are a good idea. So is long underwear. It sounds stupid. It's not. I wished I had brought some, and I spend my winters outside working without any.

      Fly straight through. Immigration is a pain, and two hundred dollars for tickets on United as opposed to China Eastern with a stop over is worth it. It'll be some of the best money you'll ever spend. Also, your luggage will probably break sometime between leaving home and getting back home.

      Watch your wallet, especially in the train station. I was there for not too long, and I had four people try to pick my pocket. Also, Beijing and Shanghai are not China. If you are going some place like Dailong, or Kaifung, life will be different.

      Take amoxillician. The Chinese are very proud of Chinese herbal medicine. Proud to the point of insisting on feeding it to you until you require immediate hospitization.

      Be safe while over there. Pocket knives are a good idea. If you bring US dollars, right now, you can live like a king on a beer budget. But that is not going to last longer than the year. China's going to be changing the way it pegs the RMB soon.

      Have fun and good luck. If you need more, check out my journal or leave me a note there. China can get depressing, so keep a smile on your face. That'll cure most ills.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    4. Re:Well... by OneIsNotPrime · · Score: 5, Informative

      ABC = American Born Chinese

      --

      ---

      WARNING:Slashdot karma not redeemable in the afterlife.

    5. Re:Well... by Eric+Savage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Simple things, like sending knives through the mail, are impossible to do."

      I'm sorry, but I don't think I would consider mailing knives a "simple thing". A hat, sure; a weapon, no.

      --

      This is not the greatest sig in the world, this is just a tribute.
    6. Re:Well... by uncleFester · · Score: 3, Interesting

      interesting timing, no?

      -'fester

      --
      -'fester
  2. R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What methods and technologies are you aware of or use to circumvent the Great Firewall of China?

    Somehow I don't think it's wise to do such circumvention if you want to stay there short-term/long-term/permanently.

    What would US officials think if a foreigner, who is planning to move to USA, talks about how stupid the whole security thing is, and asks for advice to get around it?

    If USA can attack another country "Just Like That"(tm), I would consider Chinese's censorship a godsend given it's only imposed within its own country. If you decided to move there, respect its laws; if you don't agree with its laws, go somewhere else. You always have a choice.

    At home I have unlimited access to the internet, but at work I can only access port 80, and I would never try to get around company's security policy because it's restricting my freedom to surf, although others might still try that.

    And remember, when you get caught, it's going to be ugly no matter where you are.

    So in my opinion, if you want to go into other's territory, make sure you find out what can and cannot be done there, and stick to the rules.

    1. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by damian+cosmas · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Somehow I don't think it's wise to do such circumvention if you want to stay there short-term/long-term/permanently."

      Actually, that seems like one of the easiest ways to stay there permanently.

    2. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by mopower70 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Somehow I don't think it's wise to do such circumvention if you want to stay there short-term/long-term/permanently.

      Then again, that might be just the way to stay there long-term/permanently.

    3. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by utlemming · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Somehow I don't think it's wise to do such circumvention if you want to stay there short-term/long-term/permanently.
      If you engage in that sort of thing, then you are pretty much accepting that sort of relationship. The question is whether your deported immediately, held for a time, then deported, or put in prision for a long-time.

      What I think people need to get past is the idea that their political culture and ideas are both acceptable and compatiable with other cultures. The United States and other western countries all have very incompatable world views when it comes countries like China. The only reason that the United States and China can get along is due to the trade relationship.

      There is only one place in China that you enjoy the freedoms that your looking for -- Hong Kong. When China assumed ownership of Hong Kong there were fears that the financial strength of the former British colony would suffer. Hong Kong was granted certain freedoms that the rest of China does not enjoy.

      However, when traveling to another country you must RESPECT that country. You are a guest, just as your a guest in someone's home. Failure to obey the rules of that country is rude, inconsiderate and frankly, you deserve whatever punishment is given for violations. It is arrogent to assume that you have the same rights and priveleages that you enjoy here in another country. Further, if you really want to enjoy such privelages, then stay. Part of leaving for that job is the cost of losing some of your freedoms. And just because your a citizen of XXXXXX doesn't mean that your country will bail you out in the event of a problem.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    4. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Inflammatory comments about the US aside, parent is absolutely correct.

      Screwing around with the legal system of China isn't like wearing a deCSS t-shirt and thinking you're some sort of badass revolutionary. They have those restrictions because they intend them to be obeyed. If you're a citizen of a major country, probably nothing really bad will happen to you, but just getting deported will have dire effects on your future travel plans.

      If you genuinely want to be a freedom fighter there, good luck. But judging from the frivolity of your post "here on slash-o-dot", you really seem to have no idea what you're getting into.

    5. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Naikrovek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Killing people is killing people. Doesn't matter if they're gay, Jewish, whatever. Any leader that kills people because of any reason other than war (and even war is iffy in some cases) is .. well there is no word for that kind of evil, that i know of.

      saying stalin was better than hitler is like saying "Being killed by falling into a giant puddle of lava is better than being killed by falling into a giant puddle of molten lead." they're both very, very, very bad and probably very very painful, even if just for a moment.

      killing people is wrong no matter how you look at it. kill one person out of hatred and you are no different than someone that has killed millions out of hatred.

    6. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, I take it that never attempting to make things better for yourself or others is part of your personal belief system?

      He can make things better for himself by not going to China. As for other people - Well, he's not doing anything for them, but even if he wanted to, in this case, its up to other people to make it better for themselves rather than have some foreigner telling them how to do things. While it's far from a free country, most people in China are fairly happy with the way things are run.

    7. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I am having a hard time deciding if you are trolling or not....

      actually, i'm having a hard time deciding whether the original poster, cliff, is a cop from china. posting a request for chinese citizens to publicly state:

      1. that they are breaking the law
      2. and explain how they are doing it
      sounds a bit like a sting operation to me. if i were a citizen of china and i could get throught he great firewall, i sure as hell wouldn't be talking about it on slashdot.

      now... where did i put that tinfoil hat?

    8. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, knowing people working in Cuba, exceptions are made for the Ex-Pats, including lesser filtering on web content (or more likely, access to lightly filtered web content, as opposed to no access). Also, over in the Middle East, other sorts of accomodations with regards to local laws/customs are made for Ex-Pat's (especially within compounds).

      Have you looked into the situation you are moving into in China? I assume that you are going in as an Ex-Pat with a formal commercial relationship, in which case they may try to accomodate you.

    9. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by sloanster · · Score: 4, Informative
      Hitler did kill 20 million Soviets.

      ...and it's estimated that Stalin himself killed 60 million soviets, if I remember Solzhenitsyn correctly.

    10. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by bgog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Obey, perhaps, respect? I don't think so. Your statment was well made but if I travel to some country that stones women for adulty you can't tell me that I MUST RESPECT them.

      I agree that if you break the rules in another country you deserve what you get but in my opinion you certainly do not have to respect them.

      There is a big difference between compliance and respect. Respect is earned.

    11. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As he said, it's a matter of respect. You're welcome to complain about your own government. You're also welcome to complain about the Chinese government. But to travel to China with full intentions to ignore Chinese law seems inappropriate (unless it's part of a protest, I suppose).

      Would you accept a friend's dinner invitation and show up with your own food, because his cooking sucks? Generally you either don't go, or you shut up and eat it.

    12. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by tokabola · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, I take it that never attempting to make things better for yourself or others is part of your personal belief system?

      Do you mean like America has made Iraq better? It's not for most Iraqi citizens.

      The problem with "making things better" for other people is that your version of what's better isn't always the same as the other person's. Imposing your values on another is just plain wrong, and as far as you know the majority of chinese people are happy that pr0n sites (and the malware/viruses many of them contain) are blocked.

      AFAIK the United States Government still runs a proxy site specifically for chineese people who want to access the non-pr0n sites the Chinese government restricts. Not sure what the URL is these days, it's changed a couple times when the Chinese government has added it to the restricted list.

      Tommy
      --
      Open Source for Open Minds
  3. Nothing wrong here . . . by SupremeTaco · · Score: 5, Funny

    No sir you are wrong. There is NO censorship here in China, none at all! Yes siree, everything is free and open. As we say here in Chi

    --
    You have a constitutionally protected right to be wrong, and I the right to ignore you.
    1. Re:Nothing wrong here . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...sorry my Kung Pao Chicken just arrived. As I was saying. There is NO censorship here in China, none at all. As we say here in China me love you long time.

  4. If you're a foreigner... by keesh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...they don't care. Nearly all of this censorship is only aimed at chinese citizens, and then only those that happen to be a convenient PR target. Unless you start actively trying to overthrow the government or anything daft like that, they're not interested.

    1. Re:If you're a foreigner... by einhverfr · · Score: 4, Informative

      If I were to do this... Which I don;t recomemnd but it is an interesting thought experiment... I would start by asking what the issue is for the Chinese...

      Namely they don't want dangerous ideas to spread. So low-profile sites may escape censorship.

      If it were me, I would set up an SSH server on a public host (maybe hosted by someone like hub dot org). I would set it to listen on port 80. I would then also set up Squid and allow anyone from localhost to proxy through it (Squid on port 8080). Then you can port forward port 8080 on localhost to 8080 on the proxy server and proxy to anywhere else. Depending on how the GFWC works, you might be able to get around it this way. Otherwise, depending on if it recognizes that it is NOT http, you might still be blocked.

      If you keep it a secret from others, it may be low enough to escape their radar. But if you get caught...

      Honestly? I have travelled to many other countries, and I generally recommend trying to live under the customs of the countries. You learn more that way. If you are an American, you can always move back here when you need a change.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    2. Re:If you're a foreigner... by nologin · · Score: 4, Informative
      Unfortunately, the government's definition of an attempt to overthrow them can be much different than yours, so don't expect your values to mean anything to them.

      I have had the fortune of travelling to China back in 1998, and here is a bit of advice if you plan to make a trip of any significant length.

      1. If you plan on visiting or staying for some period of time, try to avoid bringing any computers or electronic devices with you. They have a strict policy at the border to inspect and confiscate devices if they consider any materials within them to be "detrimental" to the ideologies of the government. If you absolutely need one while you are there, consider buying one in China (the prices are relatively cheap). It is easier to get one out of the country than to bring one in.

      2. While the "Great Firewall of China" might be a nuisance to you, it will be very difficult to avoid. SSH tunnelling will likely be your friend in this case.

      3. Be courteous and cooperate with officials. The larger cities have dedicated police forces, but once you are in the more rural areas, these locations are policed by the army. And they use nice shiny AK-47s as sidearms.

    3. Re:If you're a foreigner... by Cheeko · · Score: 3, Informative
      There was a presentation on the Great Firewall at the HOPE conference last summer. I didn't catch all of it, as it was just as I arrived, but as I recall, all the filtering of content goes on at the router and DNS levels. All traffic through the country is filtered, but only some is acted upon. However all content is affected on a performance level.

      There are automated processes in place for blocking some content, and there are automated processes that evaluate material once it is accessed in a certain pattern. There is also a manual evaluation in which material is reviewed.

      There was also something about logging of IPs and caching, so review can be done later for information that can't be determined up front. All of this combines for a list of IPs, a cache of content, and a number of filtering algorithms that fairly effectively block material. However stuff does get through, but only sparsely. If one IP starts hitting a site over and over, or many people start hitting it, it draws attention.

      You can download the talk at this site. Scroll down to the one entitled "How the Great Firewall works"

    4. Re:If you're a foreigner... by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Informative

      Time in China seems to be a lot like time on the internet. Unfortunately, this means that some of your advice is as pertinent to travelling to China today as talk of Netscape Navigator 4 and 40-bit encryption is to using the internet today. Apparently lot has changed in the past seven years.

      There is no special policy whatsoever for electronic devices, and they don't even inspect them at customs. Odds are that half the people on your flight will have notebook computers, digital cameras, PDAs, and of course they will all have cell phones, most of them with cameras and web browsers.

      Certain pieces of computer equipment are cheaper in China (mainly parts like RAM or hard drives) but portable computers are generally more expensive than in the US.

      The "Great Firewall of China" is very much not in evidence in the large cities. Overall, it tends to block specific Chinese dissident web sites, and not obvious stuff like CNN or Voice of America. I was not affected by it at all and you probably won't be either.

      Being courteous and cooperating with officials is always a good idea no matter where you go, of course.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  5. Have fun by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    So basically your question is stating "I'm going to China and expect to be able to break their laws as I was fortunate enough to be born in a more free society."

    Don't whine to the foreign media when you're jailed as a subversive influence.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Have fun by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Threat of China to the rest of the world? Much as all is wrong with the Chinese regime, the real danger to the world at the moment is the good old US of A. How many military actions has China been involved in in the past 50 years? How many has the US been involved in? How many countries has China invaded? How about the US? How many countries has the US threatened in the past 5 years? Mod me as a troll or flamebait if you must, but at least think about what I have said.

  6. "Get Around" the censorship? by DoorFrame · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do you really want to consider "getting around" the censorship. It's not like they're playing a game over there. They're not setting up challenges for the techno-elite to figure out how to access Slashdot from being the Great Firewall of China. It's not like "Gosh, I can use a proxy! I can tunnel... they'll find this very clever and I'll be able to do whatever I want."

    You'll be breaking the law.

    In China.

    Are you a big fan of breaking the law in general? Are you a big fan of spending days, weeks, or years in a Chinese political prison? Do you like having your legs unbroken?

    I would highly recommend against going to China with a plan of "Getting around" the censhorship. It's not just a technological hurdle to overcome, it's the law. And as a general policy, you don't want to be breaking the law in foreign countries. Their jails aren't as nice as ours.

    1. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do you like having your legs unbroken?

      Yes actually, if they were broken I would very much like to unbreak them.

  7. You have problems with the government? by daniil · · Score: 5, Funny
    and while I have just as many problems as y'all do with the government

    What kind of problems? Did you sell military secrets to the Chinese?

    --
    Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    1. Re:You have problems with the government? by nine-times · · Score: 3, Interesting
      GP: and while I have just as many problems as y'all do with the government

      P: What kind of problems? Did you sell military secrets to the Chinese?

      Wait... so, he says he has just as many problems with the government as you do, and you ask him if he's committed espionage and treason?

      What did you do?!

  8. Necessity.. by pploco · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why do you think China has some of the best hackers in the world? The "necessity is the mother ...." comes to mind.

    --
    Gimme that booze you little pumpkin pie hair cutted freak!
  9. Better Yet by fenris_23 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why don't you move to China and do all of those things while maintaining a blog of your adventure. Thus, if your blog suddenly disappears or is abandoned, then we will know for sure what happens in China when you do those things..

  10. To help fit in by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    To help fit in when you go to China, I suggest you participate in one of their native religions. This will help you get along great in your new home.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  11. I'd tell you, but.... by geekd · · Score: 3, Funny

    What methods and technologies are you aware of or use to circumvent the Great Firewall of China

    I'd tell you, but then they'd have to kill me.

    -geekd

  12. tor.eff.net? by guanno · · Score: 3, Informative

    I wonder if tor works from inside the great firewall of China. Any Chinese folks who've tried it and care to comment?

  13. List of Chinese Banned Websites by clotito · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a comprehensive list of sites banned in China: http://asp-cyber.law.harvard.edu/filtering/list.ht ml

  14. Asking for it! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Interesting
    You're just looking to get yourself into trouble, aren't you. You know they have censorship there. You know people get arrested in crackdowns. Yet you want to go over there, while not playing by their rules. This is edging close to a Troll.

    Obviously some people break the rules, use outside proxies not yet blocked by the government, and get access to prohibited information. I've been there, three times. I know some of this. And I don't recommend it. If caught, and lucky, you'll just be thrown out of the country. It can be worse.

    The question you should be asking yourself is: Just how much do I want to have a long, happy, and enjoyable time living in the PRC?

    Why not try living like a real Chinese citizen for a few months just to see what it's like? Why else go, if you're only trying to live your Western-style life just in a new location?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  15. freedom gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Having lived there, well

    a) hope you know chinese

    b) public interenet, cds, etc. is OK, and there may be more there than is let on. Note: they banned this because it's already out.

    c) there are proxies that will let you circumvent, but they will know you did that. It's a moving target game.

    other notes
    - self censorship challenges; Americans (I'm one) are loud and boisterous. Like to challenge boundarys and assumptions. That's not their culture and frowned upon.

    Basically, it's going to be different, and depends entirely where you are in that vast ranging country.

  16. Beware of the Peoples BSOD by GatesGhost · · Score: 5, Funny

    and dont use the people's explorer of internet. But i hear the chinese food there rocks (or as they call it there, 'food')

  17. Censorship.....Bah! by fenix99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I recently spent the better part of a year living in Guangzhou followed by a few months in Chengdu. As for Porn, it was being sold on the streets. I found there to be no real enforcing of any of these "bans" the central government keeps talking about. The conry is actually very free on a day to day basis, as long as you don't bring religion or something similar into a School you're teaching at, you're ok

    1. Re:Censorship.....Bah! by eformo · · Score: 4, Informative
      I lived in Beijing between August 2000 and July 2002. Because Beijing was competing for the position as 2008 Olympic host city, things like the porn were being cleaned up. This also meant that people without urban residence permits were regularly shipped back to the countryside (I hate it when the person I buy breakfast from gets kicked out of the city. Ruins the whole day.) Government intervention in daily life seemed rare, though draconian when it popped up. (They shut off heat for about a million people just to clear the skies up for the IOC)

      Regarding the internet, some friends and I made use of a commercial product with an encrypted IP tunnel past the Great Firewall. As a result, I never suffered any problems regarding online censorship. The only time I noticed things really being censored(other than the propaganda machine that is the Chinese press), was immediately after the attacks on 9-11 when the TV news channel that I was watching got shut down.

      Parent's got it right, as long as you give them no reason to bother you, they will spend their time bothering someone else.

      -ex

  18. Re:You watch too much TV by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So the Chinese Army did not send in tanks to stop students protesting?
    So those executions I saw where they had the people kneel and put a bullet in their brain never happened?
    So there really is freedom of religion and speech in China?
    So the Chinese government does not make huge amounts of money from prison labor?
    And the Chinese did not lob missiles over an island full of people to keep them in line?
    Just asking if these are all myths that I have seen on TV?

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  19. I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm actually reading your post from China right now, and I'm not entirely sure what you're asking:

    Do you really want to ... play ... a game. Are you a big fan of ... the ... general? Are you a big fan of ... Chinese? Do you like ... your legs?

    I would highly recommend ... going to China. Their jails are ... nice.

  20. His next ask slashdot... by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Taking my freedom with me to jail

    On how to take his limited Chinese freedom of information searching to Chinese prison.

    1. Re:His next ask slashdot... by rjh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The difference is this: in the United States, prison labor may only be used to produce goods and services for the state. It is illegal for prison-produced goods to compete on the open market and it is illegal for prisons to profit off anyone but other governmental agencies.

      For instance, if you're a government executive and the government gives you an allowance with which to outfit your office, you can buy desks for a song. Prisons who teach woodworking as a trade skill offer some beautifully-made things for under $100. They can do this because their labor costs are pretty much nothing. However, the prison can only sell it to other branches of the government--you won't find them for sale in the prison gift shop.

      Prison labor is also used to clean up roadways; to dig firebreaks in areas where forest fires are a concern; to make license plates; etc.

      I'm not offended by manual labor in the service of the state being a criminal punishment. I'm offended by the idea of convicts being used to make their wardens and jailers independently wealthy, which is precisely what happens in China.

      Before you go about preaching there's no difference between what we do and what they do, you may wish to learn what the difference is.

  21. First in a series of Ask Slashdots! by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Taking My Freedom With Me to China?
    Taking My Cocaine With Me to the US?
    Taking Kiddy Porn With Me to England?
    Taking Salman Rushdie With Me to Iran?

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  22. Problem solved by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "What methods and technologies are you aware of or use to circumvent the Great Firewall of China?"

    A simple unencrypted squid proxy. I live in China, and some sites are blocked (BBC News, Miami Herald, etc). I set up a proxy on a linux box in the USA, and I use it whenever I encounter a blocked site (hit F12-x in Opera to toggle).

    It's also useful when there's simply a bad connection or slow speed. Often, I can't get a good connection to some site or other, and it's not blocked, I know it's up, but the crappy infrastructure here drops my packets. So, even if there were no Great Firewall, I'd still have my proxy handy. The Great Firewall isn't too concerned with English language websites. As far as I know, only Chinese and English language sites are blocked...any other nationalities get off scot-free.

    And don't worry about getting clubbed in the head by the cops, or anything stupid like that. China is just like everywhere else...you mess with the bull, you get the horns. Hell, we smoke joints openly on the street. Nobody knows what it smells like. We went out on a lake, and the boatman asked, "why are you 6 people sharing one cigarette...you don't have enough money to afford cigarettes for everyone?"

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  23. Piercing the Great Firewall by laing · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've taken a few trips to P.R.C. since my wife is from there. I had a few problems trying to upload photos from a digital camera to a server back home (yes, I used disposable passwords). First I attempted to FTP the files directly to the server. I found that the FTP connection was dropped after transferring about 8k bytes. Next, I tried http put to my web server with a similar result. Finally I tried to send each picture as an e-mail attachment. This also failed. It seems that China does not want any unauthorized information going OUT of the country. I finally tried running an FTP server locally on the dynamic IP (163.net) and connecting to it from outside (after telnetting to my US based server). Amazingly enough it worked! Files can be moved out of China from an internal server but not from a client.

    As far as free access to information goes, good luck. They seem to have several layers of control. The first layer is DNS. Just about any US based radio or TV domain name will not resolve. You might be able to get to the site if you can get the IP address (perhaps using a method similar to above). Many sites use the hostname in the http query to determine which site to serve, in these cases you're out of luck. There may be DNS and web proxies that you can use but these are fleeting.

    --
    Sigs are a waste of space

  24. I live in China.. by fliptout · · Score: 3, Insightful

    though I'm in the USA for the moment..

    You probably will not notice a substantial abridgement of your freedoms when you get there. However, due to the developing nature of China, many processes are highly aggravating.

    Sure, you cannot access porn online- as easily as in the USA. It is still there, and you can find it.

    One thing that really has pissed me off was that I left my computer at home in the USA running a server registered with DynDNS- I'm guessing all the domains with DDNS are blocked by china. I justed wanted access to my own stuff at home, not to start an insurrection.

    All I can say is, feel free to express yourself at the right time, but use discretion.

    If you want access to all your files, buy a 1GB flashdrive and copy all your important stuff on to that. Buy 2 or 3 if you need, or take a laptop.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  25. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by demachina · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are very unlikely to do this to a foreign citizen unless what you are doing is or can be construed to be espionage or subversion. They are welcoming foreigners with open arms because they want your capital, skills, knowledge etc. so they are less likely to come down on you than one of their own citizens.

    If what you were doing was offensive enough to them and you got caught you would almost certainly be deported which is true of just about any country where you are on a visa. If you are openly violating their law there is always a chance you would go to jail but thats true of any country. The U.S. embassy probably would try to spring you unless you were getting what you deserved.

    At this point I think its a subject of debate on whether the China or the U.S. is actually worse in this regard. Hundreds if not thousands of foreigners have been locked up in the U.S. in the aftermath of 9/11 without due process, without lawyers, without trials, without access to their families, and often under varying degrees of stress, sleep deprivation for example, if not rising to the level of torture. About the only thing many of them were guilty of are various visa infractions, which should at most have resulted in deportation, not indefinite detention without due process.

    China probably does it on a larger scale but the U.S. and Americans no longer have the slightest morale high ground on which to challenge oppression and lawlessness in China. Certainly censorship isn't as bad in the U.S. but as far as unlawful arrests go the U.S. is at the same level as China. You can thank the Bush administration for lowering the U.S. to the same level has authoritarian states around the globe in this respect.

    --
    @de_machina
  26. What a sad way to define "freedom" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    He says nothing about the freedom to speak or offer others his opinions or views. Or freedom to express parody. He says nothing about freedom to practice a religion of his choice. Or about any freedoms that are actually real and important. How very sad, that his idea of "freedom" is simply being able to access web sites he chooses and download some music and porn. Yes, he would make the perfect American consumer for the future corporations have in mind here.

  27. I do not work for the chinese government by ostrich2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hello, I know it is possible to circumvent the Chinese Firewall and such, but exactly how do you do it? Who is your contact in the Network Administration Administration? Do you discuss these issues with other people inside the firewall? What are their names and do you know where they live? No, I am just curious. I do not work for the glorious and envied government of PRC.

  28. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by LeiGong · · Score: 3, Informative
    Who bloody the hell modded this troll post up to Insightful? I normally don't chime in on posts like this, but the above is just plain ignorant. I lived in China til I was 8 and I've been back 4 times since then. I will tell you from first hand experience that the Chinese government is not nearly as omnipotent as some of you may believe it is. It does not seek out the individual that's looking up porn or the guy sitting next to you in a webcafe using a proxy to read the BBC. Hell, the majority of teenagers in China learn about sex from the web. *gasp* The government is going to swoop down and arrest them any day now... I'm not defending its censorship guidelines (I think they're pointless) but trash posts like the parent should not be given any credibility!

    I will assume that the poster is an American citizen working in China, since he/she did not mention being there before. There is such a thing as extradition. Yes, that means they can't just randomly arrest US citizens for surfing the BBC and proceed with a closed-door trial w/ US Embassy intervention. Chances are, the poster will not try to start a revolution or organize a mass protest and will not be at any risk. And even if he/she did, the government would find it simply easier to just revoke the Visa and deport him/her than unlawfully detain the person. Unauthorized jailing of US citizens is equal to an international incident and it would just be easier to deport the offender. It sounds like the parent saw one too many viewings of The Red Corner. I'll say this again, the Chinese government is WAYYY too inefficent and lazy to pursue ex-pats looking at western news sources. They've got bigger fish to fish.

    If you're not trying to topple the Chinese government from the inside, you've got nothing to worry about.

  29. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Informative
    Oh, give me a $#%&king break.

    I know that sounds "insightful" from where you are, but I live in China, and nobody gets "dragged off in the dead of night". It's just like everywhere else. If you get into legal trouble, you just bribe your way out of it. If you go to China intending on overthrowing the government, you can expect to end up in their version of Leavenworth, just like any foreigner who goes to another country to make trouble.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  30. Re:You watch too much TV by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 3, Informative
    I will concur with what you said, and provide examples:

    The Christian Science Monitor, which is a non-partisan newspaper I like to read online sometimes, wrote an article about Tiananmen Square. How many students were killed, run over by tanks, and otherwise butchered? The answer: We don't know. In fact, evidence is starting to show that no students were killed in the square at all. When there's no foreign reporters around, and the government is the only one that's talking, it is indeed dramatic misportrayal of the facts that tends to take over. That said, estimates of fatalities outside the square range vary, but it was *after* the peaceful protest left the square.

    Secondly, I listen to WMBI, which is decidedly right-leaning. Yet, on one of their programs, one of the church leaders in Bejing reported that the government was not stifling state-allowed religions... in fact, the government was very much hands-off. (As Christianity is the fastest-growing religion in China, it may not be coincedence.) It was a different voice from the now-familiar persecution of believers in China, although, once again, that type of persecution was reported to have gone on in the rural areas -- it just wasn't as widespread as most Americans would believe.

    I very much appreciate these examples as a welcomed, different view into what China is actually like versus what everyone says it's like.

  31. Kinda real. by fliptout · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes *chinese* people are arrested... But I wasn't arrested for telling Chinese their policy on Taiwan was utter bullshit. Then again, I was not making a public spectacle.

    I've lived in china, and though it is not quite a utopia, I'll be living there for a few years more.

    Taiwan is cool too; Taipei is a happening place.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  32. Re:How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by CurlyG · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you even have to ask these questions, you're hopelessly naive,...

    I can hardly believe I'm responding to the flood of xenophobic ignorance in this thread, but I have a number of close friends who have spent considerable amounts of time living and travelling through various parts of China, and the ones being naive are you and everyone else here with the exception of the OP and the guy a few comments up who pointed out the the Chinese government are largely not interested in what you, a Westerner, are doing on the internet. The Great Firewall is there to monitor and control Chinese citizens.

    All this hysterical bleating about being dragged off for re-education is just absolute nonsense. The Chinese government most definately is not interested in unnecessarily pissing off Western governments right at the moment (they're even holding the next Olympics there for god's sake).

    Now, if you're a Chinese citizen then this is all a very different kettle of fish altogether, but if you're a Westerner, just take along a floppy disk with PuTTY on it, ssh into a friend's box in the US, and tunnel HTTP over the connection. Simple and unmonitorable.

    --
    You know they call 'em fingers but I've never seen 'em fing. Oh, there they go.
  33. Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Cr0w+T.+Trollbot · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "The United States and other western countries all have very incompatable world views when it comes countries like China."

    Freedom is not an incompatable world view.

    Democracy is not an incompatable world view.

    Human rights are not an incompatable world view.

    Equality under the law is not an incompatable world view.

    All of these are basic rights for all human beings. The fact that the Communist government of China has refused to recognize them is not due to "an incompatable world view," its due to a small nomenklatura of Communist elites denying these rights to their people. The ideas themselves are no more alien to China than they were alien to Japan in 1945.

    - Crow T. Trollbot

    1. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by DrSkwid · · Score: 4, Insightful


      The only right you are born with is death.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Bake · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's something I've been wondering for the past few years.

      When on earth will people learn that no matter HOW GOOD your intensions are; the only thing that simply CAN NOT be stuffed down people's throat, is freedom and the concept of freedom.

      You can not force people to be free, they can only be free if they really want to be free.

    3. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Atzanteol · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow man. That's like... Deep and stuff.

      Puff another one and get back to gym before they realize you didn't go to the nurse.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    4. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by SuperBigGulp · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The only right you are born with is death.

      ...and sometimes not even that. IIRC there have been mixed judicial opinions on "right to die" cases, although the most current SCOTUS seemed to side with this in the Florida case.

      I believe there are cases either pending or on appeal that deal with "death with dignity" cases.

      --
      Someday a Slashdot ID of 177180 will mean something.
    5. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Ioldanach · · Score: 5, Insightful
      In the US we take these as a given. I've encountered people where I work that are from other countries that truly do not comprehend the value of freedom and democracy. I'll grant the latter 2, human rights and equal application of the law.

      However, while I may grant that everyone understands there are basic human rights, the definitions of those rights are cultural, and therefore the point there is moot. The mere existence of human rights cannot be the basis of an argument that another country doesn't have them. You can merely say they don't share our assumption of basic human rights.

      As far as equal application of the law, I'll grant that pretty much every culture expects this, it just happens that there are always a few at high levels who can circumvent it, and it falls to the culture to police this. So I don't think the chinese people as a whole have this problem, though the government certainly does.

      Now we get to freedom and democracy. You and I take as a given our freedom and the democracy. (ok, this country has an elected republic, not a democracy, but the word will do for now) However, in other cultures, the need for cultural and societal stability outweighs many personal freedoms. From everything I've seen, the culture of China rejects personal freedoms along these lines, though the government does indeed go too far in my opinion in enforcing this mindset.

      Simply put, you're making assertions that require serious work to defend, and you have to understand the cultural background of the people you need to defend your assertions against.

      Can you truly express why your first two assertions are accurate, and justify them to a culture not founded on them?

    6. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      This may be a strange concept to you, but for many people in the world, freedom and democracy are not their top priorities. Often, security and prosperity trump it.

      I have a friend from Peru; I've talked with her a fair bit about what it was like growing up; she mentioned that her favorite leader was Fujimori.

      When I tell this to Americans who know anything about Peruvian politics, they seem shocked. "He was a dictator!". "Paramilitary forces killed 25 people under his orders, and Peru wants him extradited for trial!". Etc. They wonder why a person who lived in Peru could possibly have liked him.

      However, things in Peru really improved when he was in charge, in her view. From here on, I'm going to cite from memory of what she's told me, so (note to the people of Peru:) if I make any errors, pleae correct me.

      Before he took over, rebel groups used to roam the countryside and force people into serving for them; she referred to them as terrorists. Fujimori, through a strict military crackdown, hunted them down and basically drove them out of existance. They used to escape to the college campuses; colleges used to be "no-go zones" for the military; he ignored this, and pursued them into the colleges (causing some riots, which they put down). Several rebel captives were publicly displayed as an example. While a repressive means was used, a group that used to pretty much terrorize many people in the countryside was pretty much driven out of existance. As she grew up in a small town in the countryside, this was important to her.

      Then there's the drug lords. The drug lords used to call "strikes" if there were policies that they didn't like. What a strike means is that if you go to work when they've called one, they'll have you shot. They tried this when Fujimori was in power. He took the military and brought it into the cities, and appeared on television downtown, out in the open, daring them to shoot him. He then had the military transport anyone who was afraid to travel to work in armored vehicles. Some people were mad at him for bringing the military into the cities... but the strike did fail as a result.

      Then there was the corruption. Before Fujimori, there were a lot of government-aided monopolies, and a lot of kickbacks. Not only did this result in public money going to help enrich those who were already rich (and private money going to keep those people in power), but it directly impacted many people. For example, products were often "bundled" with less popular products; you might not be able to get some item that you need without having to buy a bar of soap with it, or whatnot (so everyone would end up with way too much soap). Since there were no competing companies for many products, people didn't have a choice.

      Etc. In short, she was glad to trade some freedoms that she didn't personally care much about for safety and prosperity. I know the quote... but in this case, things worked out well, in her opinion. Not everyone prizes having every last personal freedom and having a democracy over everything else... and it's a bit haughty to think that they should have your views.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    7. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by ThousandStars · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This may be a strange concept to you, but for many people in the world, freedom and democracy are not their top priorities. Often, security and prosperity trump it.

      The problem with your implication is that, over the long term, security and prosperity are inextricably linked with freedom and democracy. Western Europe had to learn this the hard way, and it took centuries to implement democratic frameworks, which most scholars think began with the Magna Carta in the thirteenth century. Those structures didn't become entrenched throughout Europe until after World War II, and only spread to eastern Europe following the end of the Cold War. The point is that the Western world has had a lot of practice and a lot of backsliding that led to lots of nasty wars, abuses of power and egotism.

      Over the short term, some countries may experience a marginally better quality of life due to a government's unwillingness to to respect human rights. Over the long term, however, that kind of government inevitably creates more problems than it solves. See the Soviet Union for a large example. See places like the Balkans or Iraq for smaller ones.

      If Peru had adopted and maintained democratic institutions a century ago, your friend would be much better off today. Instead, people opt or are forced into short term, "temporary" structures in which the government has more power than it should. Then that power is misused. It happened in ancient Rome -- a "tyrant" (before the word gained a pejorative connotation) would seize power during an emergency and then relinquish it. Until someone didn't want to. The point is that real benefits, materialistic and otherwise, come from a free people. It's only a fool's choice to offer security or freedom, because the two can't be fundamentally separated.

    8. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by bheading · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the US we take these as a given. I've encountered people where I work that are from other countries that truly do not comprehend the value of freedom and democracy

      Actually in the US you don't take these as given, and I've encountered plenty of Americans who do not comprehend the value of freedom and democracy. These are the Americans who voted for Bush, who can't see the problems with the Patriot Act or the war on Iraq, and who really believe that the Department of Homeland Security and it's powers are there to make them safer by taking away their freedoms and regulating their liberty. These are people who ignored the founding fathers who made their famous comments about the perils of trading freedom for security. Don't get me wrong, I think the USA is a great country with many great people, But I'm afraid that a majority of those who voted there are under the misapprehension that what their government is doing and the way their country is run constitutes a free society.

    9. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by narcolepticjim · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget Democracy -- sure, your war weariness increases, and you don't have nearly the control over diplomacy as with the other modes, but the economy boost makes it worthwhile if you have enough cities built. And if your civilization is Religious, you don't have to go through a period of anarchy to switch over.

      Personally, though, I always choose Commercial and Industrious, which means I'm either the lowly French or the Carthaginians.

    10. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by detect · · Score: 5, Informative
      Um, yeah maybe you forgot about a little place called Guantanamo Bay. If you think China is bad you obviously do not know about the following:


      Degrading torture on Habib: lawyer
      By Tamara McLean and Brendan Nicholson
      January 27, 2005

      The lawyer for Australian Guantanamo Bay detainee Mamdouh Habib has outlined an extraordinary series of torture methods that he says were used against his client by the United States.

      Steven Hopper said that Mr Habib was tied to the ground while a prostitute menstruated on him after he failed to co-operate with interrogators.

      Mr Habib is due back in Australia within a week after the US said it would release him without charge. The US has held him for more than three years on suspicion he knew about the September 11, 2001, attacks on the US and trained with al-Qaeda.

      Mr Hopper made the claims at an Australia Day forum in Sydney focusing on Australia's political relationship with the US.

      "Make no doubt about it, Guantanamo Bay wasn't a prisoner-of-war camp," Mr Hopper said. "It was a facility designed to interrogate people. It was nothing more than a vulgar concentration camp and it has marked a new high in the rise of American fascism."

      Mr Hopper said the Americans used prostitutes as "tools". "They'd say to detainees 'If you co-operate with us, we'll let you at this woman for the night'. And if they wouldn't agree they'd use them in other ways."

      According to British detainees held with Mr Habib and since released, "one of the prostitutes stood over him naked while he was strapped to the floor and menstruated on him".

      Mr Hopper told The Age last night that interrogators also defaced photographs of his four children that had been sent to him by his wife Maha. He said they superimposed the heads from the photographs on the bodies of animals offensive to Muslims, such as pigs.

      These were enlarged and put on the wall of the interrogation room. "They held up a picture of Maha and said 'It's a shame we had to kill your family'," Mr Hopper told the forum.

      He said Mr Habib said he was subjected to interrogation techniques at Guantanamo Bay similar to those used on prisoners at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison.

      A spokesman for Attorney-General Philip Ruddock said the Federal Government was aware of similar allegations of torture made by former British detainees at Guantanamo Bay.

      "We haven't heard those sorts of allegations from Mr Habib," he said. "But if he's got any evidence to support those sorts of claims we'd pass them on."

      Mr Habib was detained in Afghanistan in late 2001 and sent to Egypt before being flown to Guantanamo Bay in 2002.

      Mr Hopper also detailed alleged abuses against Mr Habib in Egypt, saying he was strapped to the ceiling with only an electrified barrel to stand on.

      "On other occasions they used German shepherd guard dogs and (interrogators) told him they train dogs to sexually assault people," the lawyer said. But he said Mr Habib said he was not sexually assaulted by the dogs. "Who would admit to it, particularly an Arab Muslim male?"

      The Government said it would charter a jet to fly Mr Habib back from Cuba. He will be free to go home.
      --
      // The fastest Alt-Tab in the West
    11. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by gblues · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Don't get me wrong, I think the USA is a great country with many great people, But I'm afraid that a majority of those who voted there are under the misapprehension that what their government is doing and the way their country is run constitutes a free society.

      (emphasis mine)

      I'm assuming you are not a United States citizen based on your choice of words here. Civics 101: laws are drafted and then passed around the Senate and the House of Representatives. Only after both groups have approved the bill does it get sent to the President to be signed into law. This means that the PATRIOT act did not pass due to GWB. The PATRIOT act passed because a majority in the House and Senate thought it was a good idea, and the President agreed.

      It would seem that I understand my freedoms and democracy better than you. Oh, and I voted for Bush, too. I guess I shouldn't exist according to your logic.

    12. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Caseyscrib · · Score: 4, Insightful
      When on earth will people learn that no matter HOW GOOD your intensions are; the only thing that simply CAN NOT be stuffed down people's throat, is freedom and the concept of freedom.

      Yup. One of the underlying conflicts in many of the wars (ancient Athens, WWI/WWII, Iraq, etc...) fought by civilizations was hubris. People become so patriotic that they think their country is superior to everyone else's. Some leaders have even used this arrogance to justify wars. They believe war is "good" because it tests the true strength of a civilization, and the best culture will overtake the weaker one (social darwinism). In their mind, you're doing the enemy a favor by giving them freedom, communism, or whatever. What these people fail to realize, however, is that the only reason you think you're way is better is because thats the way you were raised; to believe everything you were taught was correct and any other way is wrong or inferior. Americans like their freedom, Iraqis like their dictatorship, and Chinese like their Communism. I'm not saying they're thrilled to be told what to do, but they are complacent because they are ignorant of alternatives. If the people become oppressed enough, they will start their own revolution. If another country tries to impose their culture on them, they will become patriotic to their own government (free or not) because of propoganda their leaders tell them.

      You can not force people to be free, they can only be free if they really want to be free.

      While education and the decline of religious influence have helped dwarf rascism and taught tolerance, we're still in Iraq right now because of the same egotistical "we're the big bad fuckin USA" attitude ("Bring It On"). One day, I hope people will understand that it doesn't matter if your an American, Canadian, French, Iraqi, whatever - you're still a human being. What geographical area or political climate you were raised in will never change that.

    13. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 5, Insightful
      > It would seem that I understand my freedoms and democracy better than you.
      > Oh, and I voted for Bush, too. I guess I shouldn't exist according to your logic.

      Not at all; he simply disagrees with you. You believe you understand your freedoms better than he does; he believes you don't have as many freedoms as you think.

      Whether you understand the creation of a law doesn't really determine whether you understand its effect.

    14. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Zak3056 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um, yeah maybe you forgot about a little place called Guantanamo Bay. If you think China is bad you obviously do not know about the following

      I'm not going to stand up for what's happenning at Gitmo--I'm as opposed to it as you seem to be. However, I can't allow the suggestion that what is happening in Cuba somehow makes the US worse than China to go unchallenged.

      Mao used to rape twelve year old girls. His "Cultural Revolution" and "Great Leap Forward" accounted for the deaths of millions of his own citizens. When the US starts the wholesale murder of its own citizens while Dubya is raping children in the oval office, then we'll talk about "if you think china is bad..."

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    15. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Gannoc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If there is a riot in downtown Seattle, I expect the military to come through and clear the streets and remove the rioters, using WHATEVER FORCE IS NECESSARY.

      Yes, and lets hope that every single person in power has the same definition of "riot" as you do.

  34. UNTRUE by fliptout · · Score: 5, Informative

    You are wrong, sir, I can indeed waste my day away reading slashdot in china.

    Many news sites in English are not blocked...yet, who knows.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  35. It's a bootleg economy. Enjoy it! by eclectic4 · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...you will be rewarded by being able to purchase almost any piece of software known to man for around $3. Any movie for about $1, and game for about $3.

    There are malls there that are huge, and hold nothing but pirated software. Also, they copy EVERYthing, even entire cars. Honda in fact hired them for some parts manufacturing because they copied theirs so well for a much lower cost. If you can't beat them... They even introduced a complete copy of a "GM" car before GM even announced it. They are absolute masters at copying everything, manufacturing those copies, and even industrial espioniage. And the speed at which they do it is amazing.

    It's a bootleg economy. Enjoy it I say!

    --

    "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
  36. Let's get something straight here. by LeiGong · · Score: 5, Insightful
    China is not 1984. Repeat after me, China is not 1984. China is not EastAsia.

    It seems to me very few of you have actually been to China or even understand how the system there works. For the same reason why Europeans think we're a country of hicks driving around in a pickup with shotguns who elected a idiot to office is why you think the Chinese is some sort of omni-present superpower that oversees all of the minute details of its citizens' lives and takes sadistic pleasure in torture. You're taking in media hype and a fear of the unknown. China has its share of problems: freedom of speech and freedom of religion come to mind. These are serious issues that need to be addressed but that doesn't mean everytime you commit a crime in China you will be sent into "reeducation." That also doesn't mean if you use a proxy to surf the web that they're going to break your thumbs. The Chinese government are too busy with the same serious issues that the US is dealing with to be bothered by these minor offenses.

    While it may sound like the Chinese police force operate a Gestapo-like regime but that's far from the truth. Believe or not, China has laws and 99% of the time, they are followed. They also have lawyers that will free an innocent man. Some people vision of a totalitarian society governed by "The Party" are just too far fetched. Do they honestly think that the police operate on whatever laws they please and the people live in constant fear? I'll tell you from actually lived in China that it is hardly the case. People are way too reoccupied w/ making money to give a shit. Just remember the same media that is telling you to be afraid of China is the same one that ran the special on 20/20 about the wide-spread dangers of drier lint fires and the world-wide SARS epedemic.

  37. Have you ever BEEN to CHINA? by Xiaotou · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have. It really opened my eyes to the freedoms we enjoy versus the freedoms they enjoy.

    I have family in Shanghai (huge city), Xi'an (pretty big city), BaoJi City (Medium-sized city), and a small villiage nearby. I have travelled to all of these places and stayed wih my relatives. As a native-born American, I was thoroughly impressed with the freedom that they enjoy.

    Many Chinese never even come in contact with a Policeman. Judges and government officials (my cousin is a Provincial (read: State) Supreme Court Judge, and her husband is a high-ranking government official, BTW) live like common "folk," and people do and say almost anything they want. My nephews all play Counterstrike on-line against their classmates, and they all surf the internet. You have to understand that Chinese people are just not into Pr0n and such things like we (Americans) are. So, for them, not having access to Pr0n just isn't a big deal.

    But hey, don't take my word for it. Go see for yourself.

    Oh, and the one baby thing is only enforced in the big cities. Again, don't take my word for it. Most of my family in the smaller areas have several children.

  38. Obvious Point: Torture of Rebiya Kadeer by reporter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The obvious point in the original article starting this whole discussion is that the writer is clueless and takes a cavalier attitude towards, not only the Beijing authorities, but also towards the people who have been tortured by those authorities. Click on this link to learn about Rebiya Kadeer. Today, I received information from Amnesty International (AI), and it was an urgent plea to us in the AI community to help Rebiya. She has languished for several years in a Chinese prison.

    What was her crime? He wanted to mail copies of publicly available news articles to her husband residing in the USA. The articles dealt with the plight of women in Chinese society. She is serving an 8 year prison sentence, starting in 2000.

    Is anyone angered by this incident? I was infuriated when I received the documents from AI. Visiting China may be "safe" for foreigners, but should we not express our moral outrage by boycotting China and its products?

  39. SSH by prizog · · Score: 4, Informative

    When I was there in September, SSHing to my shell account worked just fine. Tunnel through that, and you'll be fine.

    If you're going to do human rights work there, that it's probably best to do one illegal thing at a time. So, don't look at porn when your issue is Falun Gong. And likewise, don't look at Falun Gong sites if your issue is porn.

    If you're just on vacation, consider spending your time seeing the sites rather than surfing the net. It'll be there when you get home.

    Ignore all the idiots on this site who tell you to obey unjust laws.

  40. Re:You watch too much TV by danheskett · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We (rightly) put down rebellions within our borders(cf. the Civil War). They are terrorism. It doesn't matter how political they are; actually, being especially political means you are committing treason and not just causing destruction.
    The civil war was 150 years ago. Today, when there are protestors, we let them have at it, and mostly just watch until the destruction is over. If the police overstep their roles or break the law they put on trial, fined, or fired.

    We execute lots of people. Why is it so important that they use cheap bullets rather than expensive injections?
    We execute a relative few. In the whole country somewhere between 200 and 300 people per year. The average stay on death row is between 5 and 10 years. The average death row inmate has had between 3 and 5 lawyers. The average death row inmmate has been in court and in front of a judge at least 6 times. None of these things is true about China. It has nothing to do with the cost of the bullet. It has everything to do with the process. China hems and haws about even disclosing how many people it executes. There is no presumption of innocence. There is no right to appeal. No right to seek a pardon.

    You can't joke about killing the President
    You can in fact joke about killing the President. You cannot enter into a conspiracy to kill the President (or anyone). You cannot solicit people to kill the the President (or anyone). You cannot ask that another person should kill a person. If you do make statemnets amount about the President and killing him you likely will get investigated by the Secret Service to determine if you have entered into a plot to kill the President. If you haven't then nothing happens. You can say anything about Scientology. You cannot republish copyright protected documents without permission. If you do, you may be sued and/or receive a letter from an attorney

    We dropped two nukes on two cities, something nobody else has done, to keep the rest of the WORLD in line; and have waged war since.
    No, we dropped two nukes for the explict purpose of defeating Japan. Even after the first they did not surrender. Hence the second. We showed restrainant when others would have shown known. After World War II we had the most powerful military in the history of the world. We had the most power economy in the history of the world. Our economic engine was producing war time goods at a rate that all the nations of the world combined could not match our power. We could have dominated the world, and who would have opposed us? The peasantry of China? The ruins that once were great nations in Europe? The decimated demoralized Soviets? In 1945 we could have rolled over the world, dominating and taking anything we wanted. There were no limits to the power we could project. Europe, Africa, Asia - even China would be fall to their knees in realization of American power. Yet we did not puruse that course. We rebuilt Germany. We brought democracy to Japan. We liberated and left France. We helped our sworn enemies. We established a home land in the middle east for the Jews out of compassion and remorse for a crime we did not commit.

    I love America. And I've spent my life loving America. I'll never deny our collective mistakes but I will certainly not equate them to the routine barbary that is found so often and with such foulness across the world. America has its many problems. America is flawed, and growing more so. But it will be a cold day in hell when you can equte America with communist China.

    The fact remains that the Bill of Rights - even in its decaying form - offers more protection, more glorious freedom, more liberty than most people of the world dare to aspire to obtain.

  41. Re:Communism by bombadillo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah because we all know Republicans are bigots, right?

    I don't recall mentioning Democats, Republicans or any other politcal party in my original post. I was pointing out that our country has also had it's problems with civil liberties in the past. Perhaps you have a guilty concious. Some of that White Christian guilt?

    How many Republican KKK members have you heard of? I'd dare say little to none

    Ummmmm David Duke is Republican and also a grand wizard. The roles have reversed in this country. The Democrats were once the party of racists. The Democrats are now more tolerant of peoples race. This is also reflected in the switch in the deep south from Democrat to Republican. Yep the south is racist. Remember the segregated prom in Georgia last year?

    Get your facts straight before calling some one an idiot..... idiot.

  42. Re:Proxy? by nemesisj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Encryption in China is illegal, but the general rule of thumb in China is that foreigners are not handled very roughly.

    That said, I've set up people who want to have decent access to news outlets and generally anonymize themselves on the TOR network, which is a great project from the folks at the EFF.

    TOR (http://tor.eff.org/) uses onion routing to bounce you around within their cloud of secure servers, which makes it very difficult to see who you are, where you're going, and where you came from. You can tunnel almost anything over it, and it's open source.

    I've found it to be very fast (even on China's slower internet connections), and those who use it love it.

  43. Re:Communism by Sethb · · Score: 3, Informative

    You're only telling half the story though. It used to be called the "Solid South" for the Democratic party, until a little something called the Civil Rights Act. Once the Northern Democrats and LBJ got their way and actually started granting rights to blacks living in the South, the Democratic party lost a large percentage of the southern white voters over that single issue. There are still some of the old Democrats hanging around, like Zell Miller, who didn't change party association, even though they no longer hold mainstream Democratic viewpoints, but by and large, the South has been ceded to the Republican party. Commission a poll from Gallup that correlates Party ID with this question: "Do you approve or disapprove of interracial marriage?" You'll have all the answers you need about which party contains the most racists. I'm also curious to hear your theories about why black voters overwhelmingly vote Democratic, since the Republican party is apparently so progressive.

    --
    When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
  44. Re:Just Like That? by kd5ujz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, from 1984-89, several U.S. Companies and the CDC, with the approval of the U.S. Department of Commerce, sold several chemicals to Iraq, who at the time, was at war with Iran. Here is a short list of goodies we sold them.

    Bacillus Anthracis
    Clostridium Botulinum
    Histoplasma Capsulatam
    Brucella Melitensis
    Clostridium Perfringens
    Clostridium tetani
    Escherichia coli

    This was confirmed By CDC records, Senate Banking Commision records, and U.N. weapons inspectors.

    --
    -William
    God is everything science has yet to explain.
  45. Re:You watch too much TV by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As you said there is not a one to one mach for any of them.
    Look at the posts.
    The first one is critical of the reduction of US civil liberties after 9/11. Okay so this is the same as sending in tanks to stop protesters? Plus it is "critical" of government policy! Try that in China.
    The next one has this line in it "Ross, a convicted serial murderer who has admitted killing eight women in the 1980s, says he wants to waive his appeals and die". How is this even close to killing someone for protesting? How long has his case been going through the system? How many checks and balances? I want to see the my nation stop capital punishment. If I was Chinese could I say that on a public forum?

    Your next link is critical of reductions in personal freedom since 9/11. Notice that it is critical of them plus no of the examples of abuses are running students over with tanks for protesting.
    You next one on freedom of speech totally a none issue. A company stopped hosting a website. Not the government but a private company. Get a new hosting company. For all we know they did not pay there bill.
    The link on making money on prisoners. This is critical of some local cities for seeing prisons as a source of jobs. You know construction, catering, and staff. Not using prisoners for slave labor. No shade here.
    Finally the last link. Again it is critical of US policy. It talks about problems the US is having gathering information in Afghanistan. From you link "The experiences of Shamsulrachman, the villager in Sawai, suggest differences in treatment. He says marines searched his house recently and found nothing. But when they discovered a shell casing outside of a neighbor's house that he says dated from the Soviet era, they told him they were going to arrest him. He says the Marines were civil,"
    I do not see any match here.
    Your last link... Could you have a page like that in China?

    The original post was that China is not as bad as you think and the media over states the problems.
    Of course the US is not perfect, no country is. Where are you on the whole safer and free? Your post pretty much proves my point.
    Is the US perfect? You do not think so? Lets talk about it. Let's try and improve things. Hey we could try and let others know about the things we feel need changing.
    Is China perfect..... Let's just say that it is. The is for the best.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  46. OT - Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by DarthWiggle · · Score: 3, Funny

    Aw, that sucks... 3 minutes late, and you don't get the extra "Funny" point... c'mon Mods... boost a brother up... he's just as funny, just a little, uh, slow. :)

  47. Re:Iraq by kevcol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Witness our current shining success in Iraq.

    The problems in Iraq have more to do with lack of security than people wanting to express their minds freely. Had the US done a better job in implementing security post-invasion, I'd wager the problems we see now would have been greatly reduced. You can find any number of 'man in the street' articles with Iraqis basically saying 'Thanks for getting rid of the tyrant, but why do I have to deal with carjackers everyday now?' I'd guess a majority were more than ready to be free of Saddam, but they were not happy that it was traded for anarchy.

  48. Re:addendum by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about helping those that want to break the yoke but can't.

    --
    You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
  49. Knitpicking... by Pii · · Score: 3, Informative
    If weaponized, these would be biological weapons, not chemical weapons.

    Chemical weapons include such nasties as Mustard Gas, VX, and other blood and nerve agents.

    Also, I doubt very seriously that Iraq approached us, and said "Hey, we'd like to make some biological weapons so we can really stick it to the Iranians, with whom we are at war. Waddya say?"

    The CDC wouldn't have been involved if the request wasn't made under the guise of medical research. If we hadn't provided it, they could have gotten it from any number of other sources.

    I'm not saying we never sold them chemical weapons, or the makings thereof... Just that these aren't them.

    Not everything is as sinister as you think it is.

    --
    For those that would die defending it, Freedom
    has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    1. Re:Knitpicking... by LoveTruthBeauty · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I know its natural to think that your country reflects you and therefor generally behaves well, but unfortunately that is not the case, especially in the USA.

      It is ironic that the lead article is about censorship in China. Chinese censorship is clumsy and ineffectual compared to the advanced spin and propaganda in the USA. This is why most US citizens think America is a positive force in the world, and are completely baffled when the rest of the world resents and distrusts them. Of course, nobody likes to be told they've been accepting lies. Most US citizens will be feeling very defensive and will vehemently deny that they could be influenced by propaganda. Everyone thinks its something that can only happen to someone else. That is one of the reasons it is so cuccessful.

      Outside the USA, it is well known that the USA supplied Iraq with biological and chemical weapons. Its not even controversial. Its just one in a long list of disgusting behaviours the USA has done and is doing. It was based on the 'my enemy's enemy is my friend' logic. Hussein was supposed to use these weapons to win the war against Iran.

      Funnily enough, the reason the Bush government was so confident that they'd find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq is because they know he had them because they sold them to him!

      > The CDC wouldn't have been involved if the request wasn't > made under the guise of medical research.

      I'm not sure if that is your personal theory, or if that comes from some actual propaganda. Either way, it doesn't stand up to any scrutiny. Medical research on Anthrax? At the request of a known dictatorship, currently at war? Gimme a break!

      --
      Which nations do you trust to use nuclear weapons responsibly?
  50. You think you know America by NaCl · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can in fact joke about killing the President

    Actually, you can't joke about anything.

    For example:

    two Brazilian surfers were arrested in Miami's International Airport under terrorist charges. Mizael Cabral, born in Paraíba, and Daniel Correia, from Rio de Janeiro, spent a good amount of time in Uncle Sam's land working hard to save money so that they could start a surf board factory in João Pessoa. They bought as suction pump here that would make their job a lot easier, but something really weird happened in the airport while they were going back to Brazil. According to the American authorities, they were joking about having that suction pump (pump and bomb are the same word in brazilian portuguese). The man from Paraíba supposedly asked the inspector in the airport: "Haven' you found the bomb in the bag yet?" And the one from Rio would've said: "If you open up my bag, it will explode". In cuffs, the two men were taken to Miami's Jail under the charges of "false information about explosives, with malicious intentions, irresponsibility and disregard for the human lives safety". They can be sentenced up to five years in prison and they will have to pay US$ 250 thousand dollars each. They have been in jail for almost a month and the press has no access to them.

    They are now back in Brazil, after plead guilty of terrorism! Deported.

    There is no presumption of innocence. There is no right to appeal.

    You got that right!

    --
    I shot the sheriff
  51. Oh gawd, here we go again. by emjoi_gently · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No matter what the topic, it can always be turned into an Iraq bitchfest.

  52. misinformation by TheOverlord · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm writing this way too late to get modded high enough for anyone to see but maybe someone will see it and it'll help. The irony is that I'm so late in posting as I'm in China and just woke up this morning.

    I was here briefly last summer and am now doing a semester abroad. China really is not that a bad of a place to be. It seems most of the replies are very negative or sarcastic about the security situation in China. In all seriousness, living here as a foreigner is not that bad. Sure you have to deal with weird, to the US, government regulations, but I don't feel as though I'm under an iron fist or anything. Just respect the culture and their customs/laws and you will have a great time.

    Oh and if you take the time to learn even a bit of the language it can help immensely. I know I've run into many people who were much more cordial when I told them (in Chinese) that I was a student here learning the language.

    Everyone has different experiences, especially if you are ABC or even look remotely Chinese. But instead of listening to a bunch of other people talk about it, just take a 2 week trip to China and see for yourself. I think more Americans need to get out and see the realities of the world (although my cynicism says that when the they do the average Americans will do something stupid, get into trouble, and then blame it not on themselves but on the country they are in)

  53. Re:Have you ever LIVED in CHINA? by aCC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've lived there and seen it for myself.

    I lived for 4 months in Baoji and then for 2.5 years in Shanghai. My girlfriend lived for 2 years in Baoji working in University and Middle Schools and for 6 months in Beijing. So, I've seen and experienced probably more than you.

    Living in China made me realize how much freedom we have in the west. Yes, many people speak quite openly about what they dislike. As do most people still believe Mao was the greatest person on earth (put some "70% good, 30% bad" in it to water it a bit down). But you realize how much freedom is missing when people criticize the government and keep looking over their shoulders if no strangers are listening. Can you imagine bashing Bush in Central Park in New York or bashing Blair in London and worrying that someone might hear it and get you into trouble? Privately and with foreigners they don't risk too much by being honest.

    The worst thing about China in my experience is the utterly useless and terrible media (because of the extreme censorship) and the non-existing legal system. So, theoretically many people have rights. But when a street with its buildings gets completely destroyed outside the university (as happened in Baoji) to make room for a wider road, then theoretically all the shop owners and restaurant owners get compensated for losing their main source of income. But they don't and they don't even think about going to court because it's useless.

    It's true about the police, but only because the police actually has little rights. The communist party is the ruler and they take care of things. But aside from that Chinese are in most cases very decent people (much more than in the west) because of peer pressure to not lose face for the family and other reasons.

    Go there for a longer period of time and you'll see what the real deal is. Most people only go for some weeks or months and haven't even scratched the surface. The Chinese people are very good at making you believe things are great and only later you find out that things actually aren't great.

    (Not often that I see the precious chicken (Baoji) mentioned on /. :-) )

  54. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "Fair and square"? So conquering is OK now? Does that mean it's OK if the USA conquers the rest of the middle east, whether they like it or not?

    No, it's not OK now. The world is a patchwork of territories, with every one of the major players having claims all over. When the western world became "civilized" (debatable), the territories were left as-is. The Brits have the Falkland Islands, the US has Pear Harbour and Guantanamo Bay (another wierd one) and so on.

    Democracy in it's current incarnation is a farce. Do you really believe that if the residents of a country wanted independance they'd get it? Bear in mind I'm sitting in Scotland here, where a large percentage of the population wants it, but there ain't gonna be a vote on it. Over the water from me, Northern Ireland has been contested over by terrorist groups (funded from the US ironically) for decades, and it's not worked for them. On the other hand, we have Yugoslavia, where a bloody civil war got nations their independance.

    The only peacefull change that springs to mind was the UK's hand-over to China recently. The whole independance giving (which China ain't!) thing isn't all that popular.

    Tibet has been a part of China for hundreds, if not thousands of years. It's status only came into question in the last fifty, thanks to the involvement of the CIA, during the cold war. Remember that? Lot's other places were contested over.

    The fact is that I don't have a clue about whether the Tibetans want independance. But I'm not going to blindly believe the usual anti-communist crap that the US has been spilling for years.

  55. I won't bother replying to them all... by dalutong · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are some serious misunderstandings about China being voiced here -- even by people who have gone there. I can understand this. I spent seven years in China and saw many misunderstandings both by people who had just gotten there and by people who had lived there but never bothered to really immerse themselves in it.

    China is a wonderful place. The people are nice. The culture is respect-worthy. The landscape is beautiful. The history is intoxicating.

    Is there corruption, especially in the really rural areas? Yes. But if you understand the culture and the guanxi (relationships) system then you will have few problems. They ask for 15 RMB for something that is supposed to be free? Give it. Who cares? It's two bucks. Though usually, if you speak some chinese, you can demonstrate that you are a friend of the country and of its people and get around with no hassles.

    As for the government's rejection of human rights -- things are relative. I don't approve of everything that the Chinese government does, but I also appreciate that there is an amount of ethnorelativism that needs to be engaged consciously. For instance, the UN definition of human rights includes a provision that allows everyone to live at a certain basic level -- something we know as welfare. But Americans wouldn't submit to that being a human right. Much of the world's declaration of human rights is not considered valid in the developing world because people see them as western-defined examples of human _needs_ -- something everyone accepts. (Read Azar. Human needs fit into three groups -- security (food, protection, water, etc), acceptance (for whatever group you identify with) and access to/participation in the institutions that allocate resources (markets or governments.)

    As for Internet access -- it is easy to come by. It isn't the fastest stuff in the world (esp. outside of the big cities) but the blocks are nominal. You can get around them as well. Some methods are mentioned in this thread.

    You shouldn't worry about having your freedoms repressed. Just be sensitive. Just like you wouldn't walk around Saudi Arabia (as a woman) wearing a bikini top screaming "you should be allowed to do this too!" you don't walk around China doing things that aren't culturally acceptable. It is disrespectful. And in China respect means a lot.

    So I hope you do it. The best seven years of my life (so far) were those spent in China. It was a mind-opening experience. If you have any questions you can email me. (Just make sure that you write a good subject line so I don't click "junk.") Take care! Oh, and don't listen to anyone who says China sucks or is oppressive. The experience of individuals can be awful anywhere. But statistically speaking the vast majority of Chinese and of foreigners live happily.

    --

    What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
  56. life in Shanghai - 4 years by root-a-begger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have lived in Shanghai for 4 years (U.S. born, white male). Life in Shanghai is very easy. Its simply a very large city...other than that, there is nothing that a normal U.S. citizen would find "oppressive". If you are a person who is compelled to stand on street corners in the U.S. and stir up a riot over government policies, then neither the U.S. nor China are for you at the moment. But if you are a normal person who isn't interested in stirring a revolution, China is simply not an oppressive place. You can have small group and one-on-one conversations about anything you want (even politically sensitive issues). You can access almost any content you may desire over the net (some porn sites have been blocked...some chinese political content (in Madarin, so you couldn't read it anyway) has been blocked)...but google works as you would expect and most any business which requires internet access can be conducted fairly easily. Sure, doing things like extending your visa requires going to a gov building and waiting in line, but how often do you do this? Its not much different than going to a U.S. gov office. Other services are mostly private/free-enterprise and are very easily accessed; your largest barrier is language. As with almost any travel around the world, an open mind and a friendly smile will do lots to improve your experience. In terms of the Internet...it is very slow to access non-China servers. This is caused by two major issues: 1 - the "Great Firewall" and 2 - enormous amounts of local traffic (lots of it due to infected PCs). Best guess is that its item 2 that is the biggest problem with traffic, since the content filter isn't real-time (or so it would appear). MS's recent announcement to not continue to security patch unlicensed copies of Windows will no doubt add to this problem. As to other places besides Shanghai, well this is the top city China for westerners to do business so its the easiest...for anywhere else you can scale down your expectations on services from here; but freedom of expression, movement, etc...are all pretty smooth so long as your not here to stir up trouble. Good luck to you...