Gaël Duval on Mandrake, GNU/Linux in 2005
uninet writes "To catch up on what's new since our last full interview, Mandrakesoft co-founder Gaël Duval recently agreed to talk with me about where the company is heading and other interesting IT current events, such as the Linux Core Consortium and Apple's Mac mini. You can read the new interview on OFB.biz."
First post an hour after the article was posted?
c'mon guys, what's up with that?
The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
GD: [snip] Now the question is: what's the cost of the Mac Mini without MacOS?
Seriously, this is Apple traditional (and excellent) marketing and communication.
I actually read TFA, and nothing even resembling this quote appears in it.
The parent is simply trolling.
I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
Never having used Mandrake, all I know about it is it's supposed to be friendlier than RedHat. Someone tell me if Mandrake has a point beyond that? Gentoo and Knoppix do. Does Mandrake?
Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
C'mon guys... Mandrake is a very nice distro for totally n00bs who like cute stuff. It's a nice replacement for Teletub... I mean, Windows XP desktops. My mother would love it! I'd love it also if it included a wallpaper featuring Gaël naked, but as it does not, I love my Gentoo.
"RedHat/Fedora, Debian, SuSE, and Slackware are the most well known distros."
:
... Succesfull company dont get bought and resold ...
... etc ... There desktop is supposed to be Gnome , we see more improvment coming from everybody else then from Red hat.
...
...
... and lot of other software included , KDE come to mind. But hey you dont know anything about everything keep it up ... ( I whas midly cynical in including some truth on the last paragraph Gnu/Linux is great for this everyone can use the source and improve a software. )
... your just fudding and repeating the same lies over and over ... Copying mean , taking from the others , its the other who are playing catch up to Mandrake ...
...
... ... ...
...
...
No
SuSe dont exist anymore it whas bankrupt got bought by IBM who sold it to Novell last year.
Somehow I feel it as not sinked in many peoples mind ( you do have a mind right )
Slackware is one of the oldest distribution but its not used that much anymore. Its the oldest commercial distribution and is also a commercial failure.
Debian is a big project , there not that well known outside of GNU/Linux. Commercialy , dont make me laugh.
Red Hat/Fedora is the broken promise of a 3.2 billion company who rided both the GNU/Linux wave and the Internet and dot.com bubble. And who dont feel like doing the job its got so much money for. ( its sad to see that Dell whas started with 50 million )
"And Mandrake?"
Yes the #1 distribution at the moment it can do what all the others do and can do some more.
"Most distros are ripoffs of the first 4."
You show right there to not understand at all how open source and GNU/Linux work , beside what as RH/Fed , Deb , Slack contributed to KDE beside nothing ? anything to GNU/Linux on the desktop ? No
"Mandrake is RedHat based."
No , Mandrake is based of the source of Red Hat wich are Gnu/Linux , but its not based of Red Hat. Never whas never will.
"Gentoo is one of the few of the relatively new distros that is really different."
Gentoo is a piece of shit from a group of Leechers wich is not even supported by its own user thats why Daniel Robbins add to leave the project with 20k of debts
- It as no installer like Debian ( thats not different)
- It as no real Gui based tool ( thats not different )
- There user dont support the distribution , millions of download and some people are doing the work and paying for it ( thats not different ),etc
"Knoppix, too, is more than "just a Debian ripoff". "
Yes its a Mandrake ripp off , the detetction tools are from Mandrake
"I'm not criticizing them for copying"
You would have to know the subject to criticize
" Just that what's the advantage of using a RedHat based distro when you can just use RedHat?"
How come you falsely claim its Red Hat based , when Red Hat dont even Include what Mandrake as ?
Why would you whant to use the inferior product not even supported by a 3.2 billion company , when you can use the superior distribution shipped and supported by MandrakeSoft ?
"Easy to think of one disadvantage-- "
Easy to fabricate a really stupid lie you mean
"you have to switch or live with obsolescence if the obscure distro you're using isn't being updated anymore. "
1) Its Gnu/Linux
2) Its Open Source
3) Its Red Hat who is obscure in there strategy and who do stop supporting there products
"Never having used Mandrake"
Thank you , at least one truth
"all I know about "
Is that you know nothing
"all I know about it is it's supposed to be friendlier than RedHat. "
- Run faster
I am a REAL American from Canada , not a wanna-be from the country , self called "last remaining superpower" "of America