Slashdot Mirror
Large-Format Printable Wardriving Maps of Seattle
drewzhrodague writes "In what is sure to tie up a few print queues, us guys at WiFiMaps.com have released large-format printable maps of Seattle. These were generated during a collaboration with the University of Washington's communications department. This is one of the most comprehensive Wi-Fi mapping project to date, as 100 undergrads swarmed downtown Seattle to collect wardriving data. We've rendered their results at 300dpi, for letter, tabloid, and architectural E sized paper. There is both the standard layout, and the aerial versions available using bittorrent."
While I am cool with it, keep in mind there are some possible legal implications to wardriving.
Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
...god forbid if I get lost and have to ask for directions on this one: "Excuse me sir, can you please give me directions to the nearest 'default' access point?"
I'll send them to you, but only if you give me your studnet ID. I've been looking for studs all day.
Disconnect and self-destruct, one bullet at a time.
I'd really like one of Redmond. Or, rather, this one specific part of Redmond...
No reason, really. Honest.
The coolest voice ever.
that's the map. Just my house and my neighbors. Maybe I need to wardrive Baltimore. If anybody has tell me
I can see my house from that map
I can see mine too... It's clearly marked default... d'oh!
As a few have already pointed out, War Driving has some murky legal waters surrounding it. I hope that the people involved in the creation of this map don't suddenly wake up with the FBI bursting through their doors and a DOJ lawsuit involving intent to facilitate illegal activities/hacking/terrorism/etc. I really wouldn't put it past the DOJ in this day and age. Personally I think using someones wireless network without their authorization should be perfectly acceptable. These people should have properly configured their networks if they didn't want people using them. If they use the network access to own the hosts box, that's one story, but if you're just leeching their internet access it should certainly not be a crime. You're only partaking in activities that the host allowed through his security settings. If they didn't want to allow it, they should either fix their secuirty settings, or not set up a wireless access point when they obviously had no clue what they were doing. Ignorance of security should be no excuse. If you don't want people piggybacking your wireless connection, configure it properly, don't whine about it to the DOJ. You only have yourself to blame.
"To lead the people, you must walk behind them"
366 MB?! Do you realize how long it'll take me to download that through someone else's access point?
My other sig is also a