Slashdot Mirror


Images of Ocean Floor Show Effects of Tsunami

Iphtashu Fitz writes "This week the UK's Royal Navy presented images taken by the survey ship HMS Scott of the damage to the floor of the Indian Ocean that triggered the tsunami two months ago. The Scott has a high-resolution multi-beam sonar that let it generate highly detailed images of the sea floor, some 200m to 5000m below sea level. An image showing the scale of the damage, and the full presentation made by the Commanding Officer of HMS Scott (38MB PowerPoint) are available. The presentation contains a number of images that have more detail than those available on the websites."

66 of 357 comments (clear)

  1. Save the server - download through Dijjer by Sanity · · Score: 4, Informative

    Download the Powerpoint through Dijjer by clicking here.

    1. Re:Save the server - download through Dijjer by OverlordQ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No offense, but why not use Coral Cache, etc where you *dont* have to install some plugin/3rd party app?

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  2. Down already? by mg2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The tsunami evidently took out the royal-navy's servers as well =\

    1. Re:Down already? by dr_dank · · Score: 3, Funny

      This was no natural disaster. It was the work of the deadly Slashdot torpedo.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:Down already? by Jellybob · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm feeling pedantic, so I'll point out that soc.soton.ac.uk is the Southampton Oceanography Centre.

      And I guess that may explain why my connection is so slow today, since I'm on the same exchange ;)

    3. Re:Down already? by mshiltonj · · Score: 2, Funny

      Recycling a joke from an earlier, non-related thread:

      British Techie sitting next to server room, sipping a cup of tea: Nigel, what's that sudden buzzing sound?

  3. Not very nice by MuckSavage · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linking to a 40meg powerpoint file. I can smell the server burning from here.

    1. Re:Not very nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We once hosted an 80MB video that hit the national wires (yes, slashdot included) ... you wouldn't believe how much traffic you can serve if you know how to tune apache correctly. Two virtual servers running an on IBM x335 (P4 xeon, 1.5GB RAM), each VPS serving 750-1000 requests at a time ... Besides, large single files have nothing on, say, large (filesize) sites that hit Oprah. *That* is lots of fun.

  4. Great Scott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why in the world would some sadistic person put up a 37 MB power point presentation on slashdot. Damn you must hate the home office. Well it still downloading strong for me at about 87KBs

    Timothy

  5. Oh, they'll like that! by Otter · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...the full presentation made by the Commanding Officer of HMS Scott (38MB PowerPoint) are available.

    I hope the British readers here didn't have any urgent business with the UK Hydrographic Office site!

    1. Re:Oh, they'll like that! by SlayerofGods · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does anyone ever have urgent business at a hydrographic office?

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    2. Re:Oh, they'll like that! by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does anyone ever have urgent business at a hydrographic office?

      Yes actually. I use it frequently to get tide predictions so I know where's safe (or will have good conditions) to go windsurfing. Good job I'm not going sailing tomorrow or I'd be proper pissed at not being able to get that data.

  6. Other Effects? by StarWreck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder what kind of effect this damage has had on things like Coral Reefs and deep ocean habitats surrounding black smokers?

    --
    ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    1. Re:Other Effects? by StarWreck · · Score: 2, Informative

      This: is all you need to know. Please get in the loop.

      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    2. Re:Other Effects? by Tongo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I believe (couldn't RTFA, /.'d), that they were refereing to the section of ocean floor that actually moved, thereby triggering the tsunami. I could be wrong though.

  7. Does this mean... by Undefined+Parameter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fitz just linked a 38 megabyte file from the front page... does this mean that slashdot just declared war on the U.K.?

    ~UP

    --
    Eat the Path.
    1. Re:Does this mean... by nrlightfoot · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, and here's a link to an article in the British magazine, New Scientist, which has one picture. Small article with a pic. (the sever may not be in britain though)

      --
      what sig?
  8. In other news... by HTL2001 · · Score: 4, Funny

    the UK Royal Navy website was completly destroyed by the Slashdot Tsunami

    --
    By reading this, you have given me brief control of your mind.
  9. ***ERROR! Ignorance tolerance overload! by dillon_rinker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    damage to the floor of the Indian Ocean

    BZZZT! The surface of the earth cannot be damaged. Changed, yes, but not damaged. Unless you're suggesting that we need to get back to Pangaea somehow.

    Look, there are natural tectonic processes that have been going on for as long as the earth existed. Volcanoes and earthquakes are CONSTANTLY reshaping the surface of the earth. THIS IS NOT DAMAGE. This is normal behavior for the ecosystem.

    Next we'll be hearing that the predator/prey relationship needs to be banned because it damages animal populations, or that animals need to poop more because the coprophilic bacterial populations are abnormally low.

    1. Re:***ERROR! Ignorance tolerance overload! by yotto · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just because it's damaged doesn't mean it's bad. I damage a golf ball every time I strike it with a club. Eventually that ball must be replaced. It's perfectly normal, but it's damage. I didn't see anywhere in the article (And not just because it was slashdotted before I got there) where they were talking about banning earthquakes.

      Earthquakes cause damage. That's all there is to it.

    2. Re:***ERROR! Ignorance tolerance overload! by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Correct- the surface of the Earth has not been damaged. However, a small subsection of the surface of the Earth has been damaged. If, somehow, the tectonic plates carrying North America and Siberia were induced to move towards each other, the pacific ocean would be completely obliterated (and the surface of the earth still wouldn't be damaged).

    3. Re:***ERROR! Ignorance tolerance overload! by simonecaldana · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not in an absolute meaning. Even total nuclearization is not absolute meaning. The notion of damage is intrinsecally antropocentric. Some can say that "reduction" (of biodiversity, or resources[1]) is always damage, but it is true only on the short term. On the long term, generally you can't say. The Yucatan asteroid did a lot of damage, but the mammals today are what they are _because_ that happened.

      [1] please note that a resource is a resource relatively to how one can use it. Oil is a resource for humans, CO2 is not. For plants, it's the other way around.

    4. Re:***ERROR! Ignorance tolerance overload! by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dude, calm down. Maybe the choice of words wasn't the most scientific, but if you see the effects of a big earthquake or volcano, it's kind of hard not to see it as damage, whether it is a normal occurance or not. I remember as a kid when Mt. St. Helens blew and completely devastated the surroundings. Sure, over time it will be just a little bump in history, but for the people affected, it's damage. Is this a reason to start jumping up and down and calling people ignorant?

      --
      You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    5. Re:***ERROR! Ignorance tolerance overload! by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 4, Funny

      I applaud your pedantry, sir. Let us apply this to different areas.

      BZZZT! The surface of your car cannot be damaged. Changed, yes, but not damaged. Unless you're suggesting that we need to get back to car body perfection.

      Look, there are accidental collisions that have been going on for as long as cars have existed. Cars and trucks are CONSTANTLY reshaping the surface of other vehicles. THIS IS NOT DAMAGE. This is normal behavior for the ecosystem.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    6. Re:***ERROR! Ignorance tolerance overload! by Metapsyborg · · Score: 5, Insightful
      BZZZT! The surface of the earth cannot be damaged. Changed, yes, but not damaged. Unless you're suggesting that we need to get back to Pangaea somehow.

      Look, there are natural tectonic processes that have been going on for as long as the earth existed. Volcanoes and earthquakes are CONSTANTLY reshaping the surface of the earth. THIS IS NOT DAMAGE. This is normal behavior for the ecosystem.

      Come on now, you're not even attempting to understand what they are talking about. I don't know how this was modded insightful, but it is damage my friend. Animals died, habitats were destroyed, plant life uprooted/moved/destroyed, rare/endangered species killed (not that I know for a fact, can't see the webpage). This is damage. It doesn't matter that these animals would die eventually anyway, it doesn't matter that in 200,000 years that piece of ocean floor won't exist anymore.

      Your cocky presumptiousness does not bely intelligence, it belies a refusal to understand something. Damaged, changed, modified, whatever it all means the same thing. And gee, the two "ridiculous" examples you list probably already happen somewhere in the world! People hunt to keep animal populations down (those bastard deer come to mind); I'm sure somewhere in the world predators are being kept away from herbavors to "protect" the herbavors from being "damaged". Hmm, maybe we should just ban the word "damaged", because obviously every thing that happens in the universe is due to nature. Therefore everything that happens would have happened eventually anyway, and it can not possibly be considered damage because it is "all in the natural order of things."

      Why don't you use your self-proclaimed knowledge for something useful, like understanding that words can mean multiple things and not everything people write about is a semantic argument?

      --
      (\(\
      (^.^) INFECTED
      (")")
    7. Re:***ERROR! Ignorance tolerance overload! by dillon_rinker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bravo, sir! You have amused me, as well as intelligently disagreeing with me. Truly is it said, "If I can't have a good friend, at least let me have a worthy opponent."

      Now, to refute your refutation.

      The car is a human artifact. It exists solely because human beings created it. It has a purpose to its existence. When any circumstance makes it less fit for its purpose, we call the result "damage." I don't think you can disagree that this is the generally accepted view of things.

      On the other hand, if I take my dented car to an auto-body shop, an old-school one where they still fix things instead of ordering replacement panels, I will find that they dent the car further, and drill holes in it, and scrape it with abrasives. Are these damage? I would suggest not, since these, in the end, make the car more fit for its intended purpose.

      (I think I have here the beginnings of a Theory of Intelligent Design for cars.)

      "Damage to an ecosystem" must not be semantically entwined with "changes to the ecosystem." Human ecological catastrophes must not be confused with natural ecological changes. Otherwise you will get anti-environmentalists excusing human damage to ecosystems as one more example of nature red in claw and fang, humans as the ultimate predator and shaper of their environments. Beaver dams changing the course of a stream? Normal. Humans building a hydroelectric dam that floods hundreds of square miles? Hey, why not? Beavers do it, right?

      Anyway - that's my point (one of them, at least). Start calling natural events damaging...and you've handed the anti-environmentalists a get-out-of-jail-free card. "Sure, we've eradicated 43 species this year - but giant meteors from space have historically done 1,000 times more damage! So it's OK!"

    8. Re:***ERROR! Ignorance tolerance overload! by EnderWigginsXenocide · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The changes in the surface of the earth that are caused by the nature of the earth (moving plates, covered with water, etc.) are not damage, but natural changes. NOW, if something NON-earth were to change the shape of the earth, you can start talking damage (nukes erasing small islands, meteors erasing large islands, proto-planets causing a moon to form from earth-material.) Car analogy would be, the car moving from one position to another by the power of the engine included in said car. That'd be natural for the car,and normal. When the car interacts with something else the car wasn't designed to interact with (spraypaint, curb, acid-rain, car-crushing monster-truck, j-walker) then we start to talk damage.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups. -- 0 1 My two bits
  10. tsunami WAS the effect, not the cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Images of Ocean Floor Show Effects of Tsunami

    I think people really really like saying "tsunami". Too bad most don't even pronounce it the right way.

    The floor was not the effect of the tsunami, it was the effect of the earthquake, of which the tsunami was also an effect.

    See, I like saying "tsunami" too!

    tsunami. tsunami. tsunami.

  11. Sheer unbridled stupidity by KrackHouse · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For god's sake did anybody running this site really think that a direct link to a 38 meg ppt wouldn't bring down that server?

    Can someone please reply with sites that are like slashdot but not run by monkeys?

    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
    1. Re:Sheer unbridled stupidity by carpe_noctem · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just read osnews for tech stories that will be published in /. tomorrow (with user comments even more idiotic than those found here, believe it or not), and then hit up boingboing for all the "humor" stories that will be reposted after a 6 hour delay.

      Nothin' to it!

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    2. Re:Sheer unbridled stupidity by ScruffyScrode · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think it was Jimmy Stewart that said:

      "Every time a server burns, a torrent gets its wings."

      I could be wrong.

  12. Wow... by MetaPhyzx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thinking about it scientifically, along with the terrible loss of life in this event is incredible.

    To me, this is a huge reminder that the planet in itself is capable of incalculable (in terms of lives affected) violence. And also that there will be in due time, something comparable. Or worse.

    And to think about the squabbles we have, our territorial ambitions, our day to day lives, it really means nothing in the face of these kinds of forces.

    --
    Blacker than my baby girl's stare. Black like the veil that the muslimina wear. Black like the planet that they fear...
  13. 38 Mb File Brings Limey Navy to a Stop by CygnusXII · · Score: 3, Funny

    NEWS FLASH
    British Royal Naval Communications brought to a halt today. Somehow a Naval Report on the latest Tsunami damage was linked to Popular IT Community Web Site SlashDot.org. The resulting Bandwith usage rates shot to am alarming rate, and crippled Data Communications to Royal Naval Forces, and forced the Royal Navy to respond, by issuing the following Statement. "Koh! Blimey! We've been knackered by the BOFHs'!"

    --
    My cat's picked up a Hammer. HEY! Put down that Hammer. Put Down that Hamm...THUNK!
  14. Not the tsunami... by Sabaki · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not only were the undersea landslides not the result of the tsunami -- they were the result of the causal earthquake -- but there's evidence to show that undersea landslides can be a major cause of tsunami. So these might help explain why the tsunami was/were so devastating.

  15. Article text by Swamii · · Score: 4, Informative

    A 40 MB file on the front page. Way to go douchebags, thanks for taking our server out. Here's the text of the article:

    The Royal Navy's survey ship HMS Scott has collected unique images of the Indian Ocean seabed in the vicinity of the devastating tsunami earthquake epicentre.

    The work, announced last month by the Ministry of Defence, is being carried out in order to further the understanding of earthquakes and assist prediction of such events in the future. It will be of considerable benefit to the Asia region as a whole and potentially give a global perspective.

    HMS Scott's tasking is a non-military role that will provide bathymetric ( measuring the depth of water ) and geological assessment of the Asian earthquake epicentre and extended fracture zone. To assist with this, scientists from the Southampton Oceanography Centre and the British Geological Survey have embarked in the ship.

    The depth of water in the vicinity of the epicentre varies between 200m to 5000m which is well within HMS Scott's capability using her high-resolution multi-beam sonar.

    The epicentre lies within the Indonesian Exclusive Economic Zone, and the survey itself follows discussions with the Indonesian Government about HMS Scott's potential value in furthering the understanding of the earthquake and future risk prediction. The survey falls under the definition of Marine Scientific Research under United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

    Survey imagesHMS Scott's survey will provide the 'base map' for future extensive research into the process of how earthquakes work; this is a crucial moment to conduct such research.

    While HMS Scott is not directly involved in the humanitarian relief effort, her survey work in the vicinity of the epicentre is of significance to the scientific community in furthering the understanding of the tsunami.

    HMS Scott deployed from the UK in November 2004 in order to undertake a programme of work in the North Atlantic, Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean and is scheduled to return to the UK in June 2005.

    --
    Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
  16. 1500m??? by justforaday · · Score: 4, Informative

    From TF(/.d)A:
    The collision has forced up spectacular large thrust ridges up to 1500 m high...

    New ridges nearly a mile high?!? Well, that certainly explains the little wave it made...

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  17. this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is getting ridiculous. Why does Slashdot continue to post stories with direct links to massive files that are hosted on sites that will obviously be killed instantly, once users start clicking the link? Would it be too much to ask to begin mirroring the files, or provide a torrent?

    These stories that reference some outside source are useless half of the time, because the source instantly becomes unavailable for a few hours until some new story comes up. It's getting really old.

  18. Cause and Effect by irhtfp · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It should be pointed out that the headline of this /. story is misleading. (Yeah, I know, what else is new?)

    Images of Ocean Floor Show Effects of Tsunami

    The damage to the ocean floor was a result of the cause of the tsunami - not the effect thereof. Tsunamis do not damage the ocean floor until they get into very shallow water (i.e. the coastline).

    --
    I've made up my mind and now I've got to lie in it.
  19. Major slip by JJ · · Score: 4, Informative

    The India tectonic plate, one of the most mobile in recent geologic time, slipped underneath the southeast asia one causing a major uplifting, which caused the tsunami. A relatively unusual geologic cause of a tsunami. Original reports where that some areas fell by 2000 ft, which would be quite remarkable and a bit of an exageration.

    --
    So long and thanks for all the fish . . . !!!
    1. Re:Major slip by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The India tectonic plate, one of the most mobile in recent geologic time, slipped underneath the southeast asia one causing a major uplifting, which caused the tsunami."

      Not to mention the Himalayas...

  20. Re:Short attention span by chill · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bullshit.

    Didn't you see the news YESTERDAY where Bush tripled his funding request to Congress for tsunami aid to $950 million?

    Oh, wait. You were too busy bashing the U.S. to let a simple thing like hitting news.google.com (where it was a top story in it's category for most of the day) get in your way.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  21. We Sank Their Battleship! by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    > Fitz just linked a 38 megabyte file from the front page... does this mean that slashdot just declared war on the U.K.?

    Slashdotters' guns were aimed and requests were comin' fast,
    The first link hit the website, they knew she couldn't last,
    That mighty Naval server room is just a memory,
    "Avenge the Bismarck" was the battle cry, sent over TCP.

    We found the freakin' powerpoint that's makin' such a fuss!
    We slashdotted the website 'cause the world depends on us!
    It hit the front page runnin, when we spun our browsers 'round,
    Yeah, we found the Royal Navy, and then we shut 'er down!

    With apologies to Johnny Horton's Sink the Bismarck, 1960, and those who served aboard both the Hood and the Bismarck.)

  22. Re:Short attention span by timster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sure the reduced media coverage is why President Bush asked Congress to approve $600 million in new money for tsunami relief. That was... Wednesday: http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/02/09/tsunami.aid/index .html

    The lack of media coverage is just because nothing new is happening. The event has happened, and now the affected areas are entering a long rebuilding process. We're still helping them. It's just not a new story anymore. There's a reason it's called the news.

    --
    I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
  23. Re:Short attention span by gaintner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Please. The American media may have plenty of problems, but its hardly to blame for the lack of attention being paid to Sudan. It's been going on a long time, and the media occasionally tries to bring it up again. The fact is we just don't care about what happens in Africa. Maybe if a few members of the British media (or someone else we actually relate to) wander in there and get massacred, we'll pay some attention. But the tsunami isn't to blame. If it wasn't the tsunami story that took precedense over the Sudan story, it would have been something else. Perhaps what Britney Spears had for breakfast, for example.

  24. NEWSFLASH!!! by EmagGeek · · Score: 3, Funny

    A tsunami has been detected approaching the coasts of Greenland and Iceland from the East. Geologists suspect this tsunami is due to the plunging of the entire uk.gov webserver complex into the atlantic ocean and a very high velocity.

    Did anyone happen to get the entire presentation and have a torrent up somewhere?

  25. Donations? by temojen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Many Canadian charities havce stopped accepting tsunami relief donations. The Canadian Red Cross claims to have enough money to sustain their activities in the region for ten years.

  26. Follow up story by MosesJones · · Score: 4, Funny

    Today the British Navy abandoned the gulf and turned its ships and nuclear submarines onto the Slashdot editing team. An initial force of Special Boat Service (SBS) forces was expected to take out the chain of command before a period of continual bombardment by artillery, missle and aircraft.

    A spokesman from the British Navy said "right that's it, we've left the buggers alone since 1812 but that does it."

    In related news Slashdot is being re-hosted from Camp Delta, along with any remaining members of the editing team.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  27. Re:Short attention span by networkBoy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Besides all the other posts, I seem to remember the US being told to "go home, we don't want you here" by some governmental agencies over there. Makes me wonder why we trippled our aid . . .
    -nB

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  28. Re:'Damage' is a loaded term by pclminion · · Score: 2, Insightful
    These are geological changes, not Grandma's china getting broken.

    Heh.. I was going to make the same comment but you got it first.

    When a tree grows out of the ground, it pushes soil aside -- would you then describe the ground as "damaged?" Is the moon damaged because it has craters?

    The word "damage" is only meaningful in the context of human activities. As you succinctly stated, this is change, not damage.

  29. It's still "damage" by dustmite · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wouldn't say it's not damage, I would rather say that it's this type of damage is just a normal part of the Earth's processes. It's still damage, although I understand your point that that is probably too abstract for Joe Public to grasp by him/herself, and so the term is misleading to the public, who only think of damage in purely negative terms.

    Next we'll be hearing that the predator/prey relationship needs to be banned because it damages animal populations

    Similar but true: For a long time people thought that forests and other ecosystems such as grasslands and vynbos should be "protected" from fires, because it "obviously causes damage", or so people intuitively thought. This causes problems such as excessive amounts of flammable material building up on forest floors, making fires far worse when they do occur, and complicating necessary natural decomposition processes. More importantly, fires have been burning in these ecosystems for so long that the plants and animals have evolved to in some cases require them to occur, for example some types of seeds will only germinate once they have been burned or smoked. Nowadays the focus is usually on better management through controlled burnings so as to avoid the burnings causing problems for human activities.

    As with all complex systems, the natural world is not always intuitive. Also, wanting to protect nature and *understanding* nature are two different things. The problems stem from incomplete knowledge (as with global climate change). The answer is always more knowledge.

  30. BitTorrent by Nahor · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hopefully it works, it's my first. Max upload (30KB/s)

    https://orby.orb.com/~jehan/Earthquake%20present at ion.torrent

    1. Re:BitTorrent by Nahor · · Score: 2, Informative

      preview, preview, preview!!!!

      Torrent here

  31. Re:Short attention span by WankersRevenge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    yo whack-o-jack-o,

    He wasn't bashing the US rather he was being a little critical of the US media which in my opinion, not only needs a little ribbing, but also a full on figure-four-leglock. And maybe a few kicks to the skull for good measure.

    If being critical of the US media makes a person an american agitator , then forward my name to the committee of Un-American Activities.

    btw, i find your username particularly ironic in contrast to the tone of post. back to the quaaludes for you, baby.

  32. Re:Short attention span by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nearly a billion dollars is pathetic?

    How much have you PERSONALLY given to the cause? And then, can we see how much you have spent on other, not-necessary expenses?

    If you want to cast stones, one should be ready for the return volley.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  33. In related news... by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Funny
    Recent images of the ocean floor in the tsunami area found traces of an ancient city, temptativelly named "R'lyeh".

    Also, a big monster with a head like an squid is walking from there to Tokio. Press there don't know if call it Godzilla, or if they must call Godzilla to save them.

  34. Re:Short attention span by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How much have you PERSONALLY given to the cause?

    I PERSONALLY gave hundreds of dollars UNWILLINGLY for the invasion and occupation of Iraq.

  35. I felt a great disturbance in the Force... by Gorimek · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...as if millions of slashdotters all posted the same joke about the Royal Navy's web server going down. I fear something terrible has happened.

  36. NOAA Bulletins from the Scott by X_Bones · · Score: 4, Informative

    More information and pretty pictures available from NOAA's Web site: http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tsunami/indo20041226/hms_ scott.htm

  37. Re:Short attention span by pclminion · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As you noted, we are giving $190/person displaced. This, however, is not the entire amount we are giving. We have done other "off budget" donations by diverting resources from military, and other means. If anyone can show me a source with a grand total, I would be interested to hear it.

    Whether or not the money is sufficient, the fact remains that we're willing to spend 1000 times as much money per capita on war as on humanitarian activities. No matter how you slice it, there's something wrong there. Iraq is not like World War II which had to've been won at any cost.

    My argument about your personal giving is valid. If someone doesn't but their money/actions where their mouth is, then they are generally not worth listening to.

    I didn't say it was an invalid argument, merely that it's silly because I could simply lie and tell you I donated $1000 personally and you'd have no way of checking. So what's the point in telling you whether I've donated? You can conveniently claim I'm just making it up.

  38. Powerpoint mirror by smoker2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    For those without a torrent client there is a mirror of the powerpoint file here.

  39. It was three times larger than first thought! by antdude · · Score: 4, Informative

    LiveScience report that a new analysis of the December earthquake that caused disastrous tsunami waves to strike Asia and Africa. The report finds it was three times more powerful than earlier measurements suggested. This would make it the second largest earthquake ever instrumentally recorded...

    From AQFL.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  40. Some would say every possible solution is wrong. by gimpboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I too did not vote for Bush. In fact, you could say that I voted against Bush. This doesn't mean I believe everything he does is wrong. In regard to the tsunami relief effort, I feel we are doing a good job. Now this isn't one of those "America is the most generous countries in the world" posts. We had our soldiers flying in on relief missions and we stayed around providing drinkable water and food to people. We've also worked with other countries to help with the long term reconstruction.

    Some people will say we are not spending enough no matter how much we spend. Sure Iraq was a war of choice -- it was also a war I opposed. Once we made a commitment there as a nation we had no choice to follow through with that commitment. Iraq is our obligation at this point.

    What happened to the people effected by the tsunami is tragic. Of this there is no question. However, our obligation there is not the same as our obligation in Iraq. In many ways it is pointless to compare the two situations.

    When peole bash Bush, just to bash Bush they loose a lot of credability. If you want to criticize his private social security accounts thing, hey there is a lot to support your critizism. Fell free to criticize how he handled the occupation of Iraq. I personally think he fucked that one up. However, if you think everything he touches turns to poo, you're just going to be considered a left leaning extremeist.

    --
    -- john
  41. So what about.... by jd · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Southampton University, one of the other sites linked to and slashdotted off the face of the Earth? Ok, so the Royal Navy has special forces, nukes and really, really bad food. But the University has bad food, too, and the bar has more than just rum.


    The Joint Academic Network also pays per unit of data transferred over the transatlantic link. You've just bankrupted them!


    On a slightly more serious note, I think the fact that Slashdot can bring down some fairly beefy servers demonstrates that there is a fundamental flaw in the architecture of the Internet. Slashdot is "popular", but not overwhelmingly so. I don't think I've ever seen a topic go above a few thousand posts and it's very likely many people posted more than once. Slashdot's total circulation is probably in the 5,000 - 7,500 bracket. In comparison, a typical British broadsheet might be read by 175,000 people. Give Slashdot 30 times the readership, and admins of even the most powerful sites would cower in terror.


    Network overload is not confined to the realms of Slashdot, however. The tsunami early warning system is to be placed in a highly active region. There may not be many real tsunamis, but there will be a great deal of information flooding in. Unless those monitoring and administrating the system have a reliable and effective means of filtering out what is useful and what isn't, they'll either be causing a panic on a daily basis, or blithely ignore the next catastrophe as it unfolds.


    Raw information is like raw chicken - hazardous in that state, but beneficial when correctly processed.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  42. Re:Short attention span by magarity · · Score: 2, Funny

    You are one sick fuck.

    Sounds like somebody got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning!