Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Force Mass Closure Of Net Cafes

Chien Andalusia writes "According to this article from the BBC, the Chinese authorities closed 12,575 net cafes towards the end of 2004. Due to the expense of computer hardware, net cafés have become very popular in China in recent years. The laws governing such cafés are very strict, especially in relation to minimising the amount of exposure children can get to the internet. For example, no net café is allowed to open within 200 metres of a middle or elementary school. The article also briefly discusses other restrictions imposed on Chinese net cafés."

30 of 497 comments (clear)

  1. Give 'em Alcohol by schestowitz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Serve alcohol at the Inertnet cafe and the problem is solved. No controversy either

    --
    My Linux - (L)ove (I)s (N)ever (U)tterly eXPensive
    1. Re:Give 'em Alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Serve pot and they don't even need Internet access. They'll just sit quietly grooving to the screen saver.

    2. Re:Give 'em Alcohol by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Funny
      Serve alcohol at the Inertnet cafe and the problem is solved. No controversy either


      Oh, sure. Cause what we really need is a half a billion or so more drunk people surfing the web and posting stuff on Slashdot. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  2. Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I suppose it's only a matter of time til the chinese government learns what most people already know. If more than a few people know a piece of information, then it's pretty hopeless to try to contain it.

    Now if only the RIAA/MPAA would learn this lesson.

    1. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by luvirini · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well the point of the restrictions is not really to stop those who do their best to circumvent things. Instead the point is to keep the public at large ignorant. Every society will have it's dissidents, but it is only when a significant proportion of people get dissident that real problems occur for those ruling. That is what the government tries to stop.

    2. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right, and what I'm saying, is that once the info's out there, and as long as it's got a important enough value to the people, it's likely to get to them one way or another.

      For instance, don't you think they realize on some level whats REALLY going on, i.e. they're being censored. Upon discovering that, I'd be inheriently curious.. what exactly is it they're protecting me from? And lo, the ball and started rolling...

    3. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now if only the RIAA/MPAA would learn this lesson.

      Must even the most un-related news items be somehow tortured into a reason to self-proclaim one's rights to an artist's work, unpaid-for? Some Chinese citizen sitting in a net cafe "knowing" the news is not the same as you sitting in your living room "knowing" the latest Green Day CD without paying for it.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by jokumuu · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well I for one did some tests when I was studying. Part of an introductory politics course was asking people on the streets for their opinnions. I did sneak in a lot of knowledge questions about the questionable sides of society like the procentage of richest people who hold 10% of the total wealth and the procentage of the people who hold 10% lowest. The replies ranged quite far, but the ammount of people who came even to right orders of magnitude were depressignly low. So unfortunately I do have to side with the grandparent.

    5. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by quarkscat · · Score: 5, Funny

      No doubt this is the PRC's way of limiting
      the number of dissidents it will have to
      arrest. You can't expect their government to
      build hundreds of new prisons without having
      new labor contracts already signed by Western
      corporations. The PRC government does have
      rudimentary knowledge about supply and demand,
      and staying in the "sweet spot" for labor costs.

    6. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by luvirini · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, I am not talking only about US, and definitely not in specially "elitistic" way. I have been to quite many countries in the all in all, and the same rule seems to hold true in most of them: Most people do not want to think.

    7. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by saider · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Upon discovering that, I'd be inheriently curious.. what exactly is it they're protecting me from?

      Because our society values the freedom to make your own decisions. That's why there's a stink everytime the gov't tries to restrict our expressions.

      In China and other places, the people are brought up believing in the Government as a protector, as a father. Since there is little to contradict this, they believe that the government is acting in their best interests when it tells them not to do something. Because of their lifelong conditioning, they accept this fact and move on with their lives.

      This is how humans in general operate, and because we are conditioned differently in the West, we have a different response to and view of our governments. North Korea is another example of this. There was a show on PBS showing the horrific conditions in the country. The only reason they put up with it is because they honestly feel that South Korea and their imperialist allies will kill each and every one of them. They are in a completely different reality.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    8. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Znork · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For every person exposing the truth, hire ten to malign him, change the issue, confuse the facts, misrepresent his views, misrepresent your views and outright lie and threaten.

      I've realized that I'm being manipulated every day, and I live in a western democracy. Do you know how very difficult it is to discern who is manipulating you in what way, and how they in turn have been manipulated? Do you understand how difficult it is when you cannot even trust your own mind and language, as you will find your very instincts erraneous and the very language biased?

      In your average newspaper and newscast it's almost impossible to find a single unbiased and non-propagandistic article. They're as rare as factually correct articles, and often the two go hand in hand. As journalists no longer appear to have the time, and few the integrity, try to do the factchecking yourself, and trace interests and bias in the article, and compare between different ones.

      It's not that the average person cant form an opinion, understand a problem or draw conclusions from the facts. It's that the average person does not have the time, inclination or opportunity to double-check and cross-reference every fact and opinion they hear and question every belief and opinion they have once they discover inconsistencies. It's not very rewarding or conductive to living a happy life.

      Propaganda works. And you, I and the Chinese get tricked every day.

      What exactly are they protecting you from?

    9. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by adamfranco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In your average newspaper and newscast it's almost impossible to find a single unbiased and non-propagandistic article. They're as rare as factually correct articles, and often the two go hand in hand. As journalists no longer appear to have the time, and few the integrity, try to do the factchecking yourself, and trace interests and bias in the article, and compare between different ones.

      For a scholarly look at this issue read Edward Herman & Noam Chomsky's Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. In it they describe in detail many, many examples how "the powers that be" in the U.S. of A. have used the structure of the mass media to distort the world view of the citizens of this [USA] country.

      What exactly are they protecting you from?

      As far as I can tell, the nature of Power is such that for the most part, those with it want to keep it. Additionally, money and influence are both part of and equivalent to Power. With [enough] money you can buy influence and with [enough] influence you can obtain money. In order to retain Power those with it must ensure not that the populace is well off, but that they are content enough that they do not rebel or otherwise try to overthrow those in Power.

      As much as the United States is a democracy, true democracy (in which all have a generally equal say) is impossible if there is a large concentration of Power (money and/or influence). If Power is not [relatively] evenly spread, then those with it can get a larger say by either force or by manipulating those without Power into agreeing with them.

      So, what exactly are they protecting you from? In general, feelings of dissatisfaction with the state of your world (as it reflects on them) and your place in it. This manipulation can come in many forms, but several common ones that are repeated over and over are:

      - Enemies: Enemies focus attention away from domestic problems to external entities, as well as providing a framework for "Be happy, at least you aren't in xxxxxx" comments.

      - "Mindless" Entertainment: The more entertained you are, the less likely you are to rebel. "The Matrix" is an extreme example of this.

      - Playing on dreams: The "American Dream" is partially summarized as the opportunity of anyone who "works hard enough" to climb the economic and social ladders. In the current day and age (as well as many past) this is no more true than elsewhere in the world. A very few people truly go from "rags to riches" while the rest of us stay plus or minus a few degrees from the place where we were born. The promise of the "American Dream" is repeated so often though that most people take it to be truth, thereby voting for tax cuts for the rich on the belief that they will soon be rich too.

      These and other tools can and are used by those with Power to protect the rest of us from the harsh truth that we are being cheated and our situation would be better if those with Power didn't have it.

      --
      "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
    10. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by adamfranco · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...merely to point out Chomsky's politics, which are decidedly anti-capitalist, pro-socialist to begin with.

      The point is acknowledged that Chomsky is far from "centrist", extremely so in fact.

      To see a book written by Mr. Chomsky come to the conclusion that capitalism is bad, wealth and thatpower must be "evenly distributed" is about as surprising as hearing water is wet.

      Please note that the views about Power/money/influence beginning with As far as I can tell, the nature of Power... are my own. If Mr. Chomsky has expressed similar views then I applaud him for reaching similar conclusions in his own inquiries into the state of the world.

      Nowhere in my reading of Manufacturing Consent (MC) did I see any any anti-capitalist references. The only place MC comments on "even distribution of power" (that I noticed) is in discussing the 1984 elections in Guatemala. Chomsky and Herman question how meaningful elections could be in a state where power is concentrated in the hands of an authoritarian junta that has just executed or "disappeared" most of the journalists, political rivals, and judiciary in the country. I have not read any of Chomsky's other writings, so I cannot speak on them.

      Nice sig: So let me ask you: are you more proud of your ignorance or your bias?

      The question implies that ignorance and bias go together and encourages the reader to fix the bias by fixing the ignorance. I heartily agree with this viewpoint, which is part of why I found reading MC so interesting, even IF the the author's positions are in some way as baseless as those of Limbaugh. The important thing is to gather one's information from a variety of independent sources (including direct observation where possible) so that one can make informed opinions and choices about the world.

      Though Rush pushes this limit, I do not believe that anyone can lie and misrepresent in everything that they say. Included in the deception are little scraps of truth buried in page B17, Appendix 25, or in what things one observes at events first hand, but are not said by others reporting on the event or using that event to push their agenda.

      Your post induced me to read up on Mr. Chomsky as I didn't know much about the man or his views aside from reading one of his books. Wikipedia has a very in-depth article that discusses many points of view on the man and the cult of personality surrounding him. As with everything, somewhere amongst the words of critics and of followers lie small truths. That he (or any other person) is a lier and propagandist or an insightful thinker that cares more about ideals than opinion is something one must discover for one's self and is not something just to take a single source's word for.

      More thoughts on capitalism, wealth, and power:

      As they are by definition made up by more than one person, all societies are by definition compromises between the desires of their members. Various societies try to balance these desires by employing various economic systems. In a [completely fictional] utopia all people would be able to have anything that they want and never have to deal with fulfilling desires of others that conflict with their own. As the world is finite conflicts do arise and economic systems are employed to work these conflicts out. The general hope (I believe) is that the chosen economic system will provide a basis for supporting the other ideals of a society; be they listed in the US Bill of Rights or others such as a right to education, a right to health care, or a right to choose to garden in the nude. What ever they are, these ideals of a society provide the framework for discourse and function within it.

      I have no problem with laizes-faire capitalism, regulated capitalism, socialism, communism, or any other economic system as long as the chosen one[s] allows the ideals of my society to flourish internally. The problem I have is

      --
      "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
  3. Yay communism by Nastard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because it's important that we limit, as much as is possible, our children's exposure to information, education, technology, or anything else that might shape them into better, more productive members of society.

    China: The Biggest Red State.

    1. Re:Yay communism by jc42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed; Communism is thoroughly dead in China. The current ruling gang apparently doesn't even give it lip service any more. Many writers with a bit of historical knowledge have commented that China is again ruled by mandarins, though they may not use that term.

      It is impressive how long rhetorical terms can last. Thus, Communism died in the old USSR when Stalin took power and became in all but name a new tsar. But Western propagandists still used that country as an example of Communism 50 years later, despite all the objections that the term no longer applied in any meaningful fashion.

      It's likely that 50 years from now, Western politicos will still be using China as an example of Communism, in their attempts to extend the old Communist/Capitalist false dichotomy.

      It's really just a way of blindly using code words to avoid at reality. A reasonable approach would be to simply treat terms like "Communist", "Capitalist", etc. as symptoms of writing without much thought or understanding. It's hardly worth debating when such terms appear, since (as a form of Godwin's observation) such terms usually mean that no reasonable discussion will be possible. In American politics, the terms "Liberal" and "Conservative" have come to have the same import.

      OTOH, if someone refers to events in China as "Chinese", reasonable discussion of events there might be possible. The current rulers of China aren't beholden to any outside ideology; they are their own people, with their own ideas and goals. Understanding will come from talking about them as they are, not by describing them with foreign words that don't apply very well.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  4. Uh huh... by UnRDJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In other news, the Chinese goverment are a bunch of commie bastards, SCO are liars, and Microsoft has a monopoly on the desktop market. Seriously though, this kind of reporting is good. People tend to forget about this kind of stuff unless they're frequently reminded.

  5. And we're surprised why? by DesScorp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    China, for all the hype about markets opening up their society, is still a totalitarian communist country. I'm not surprised that they've cracked down on the cafes; I'm surprised they exist at all.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:And we're surprised why? by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      China, for all the hype about markets opening up their society, is still a totalitarian communist country.

      No, they're a totalitarian capitalist country now. Arguably fascistic, but certainly not democratic.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  6. The Children by Dracolytch · · Score: 4, Funny

    We will impose our elitist totolitarian regime on you because of the Children! Won't you think of the children? (Thud) How about now? (Whap) Now? Good!

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  7. The Censorship Technology Is Good If Used Properly by Space_Soldier · · Score: 4, Funny

    We all hate what the Chinese government are doing to their population, but all you admins out there, think about it. Their censorship technology is the best in the world, and it would improve production if it was implemented in USA companies. How would it improve production you ask? It will, for example, keep people from reading Slashdot all day.

  8. Is not only about censorship by stm2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At least the ban for inet cafe close to elementary school. In Argentina we have a similar situation, there are a lot of inet cafes because hardware is very expensive since peso devaluation and Internet conection is also expensive. Most inet cafes are used to chat using MSN and IRC and playing FPSMPG (like Counter Strike), so boys hang around for hours there instead of studying. It is very cheap, because there are a lot of inet cafes, it cost about 0.35$/hour, that is cheap even for us. Boys mostly plays and some MSN, and girls go just to chat via MSN.
    I am giving a basic computer course in an elementary school (9 to 12 years old) and they are asking me to teach them just to chat, even before learning how to type!

    --
    DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
  9. Not as bad as you may first think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was in Beijing last summer, and the one thing that struck me was how our American media promotes an image of an evil tyranny in China. (While it is true that most freedoms - as we know them here - don't exist, it isn't the spawn of evil its made out to be.)

    I had no problems accessing the Net from my hotel - albeit an intl. dialup connection - and even visited a few Net cafes. Most people I spoke to said the Internet was great but that we Americans don't realize that what we may want or consider a "great freedom" here in the US is not considered as important in the rest of the world. (Alright before you start going berserk and start spewing off about basic human rights, consider that we have made many, many mistakes in the past and it took us time as well to reach a state where we consider these freedoms as our rights; give 'em time!)

    Anyway, my point being, Internet was completely accessible except for a few sites that seemed to be proxied out at the Net cafes - Slashdot being one of them! ;)

  10. Thinking of the children by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm sure we're going to get the usual "Chinese and enforced censorship" spiel here, but taking a step back and looking at the bigger picture what they Chinese have done is quite reasonable for their claimed goals. The Chinese government publishes a list of regulations for operating a Cybercafé, admittedly a strict list, but it's there, it's the law and you break it at your peril.

    The main causes given for the closures is locating a Cybercafé right next to a school and allowing minors free access to pornography. What chance do you think a Cybercafé would have to continue trading in the EU, US etc. if it was found to be a magnet for truants and/or providing unfettered access to pornography to minors? They also restrict violent games to certain age groups, which is different to the age requirements we have on our computer game boxes, how exactly? Doom 3 is rated "18" in the UK for example, and companies can be prosecuted for breaking that restriction and selling the game to a minor. The same goes for logging all outbound access - you'd be insane not to log everything if you were running a Cybercafé in the event someone launched a cracking attempt from your premises.

    OK, I do have concerns that these logs are going to be "auditted" by the Chinese government for what they might see as subversive elements, disloyal behaviour or whatever. The censorship of free access to information, even if it *is* pornography, should not be blocked - immoral and illegal should not automatically be the same thing. Still, at least the Chinese appear to understand that restricting Internet content is an internal matter and are making an effort to deal with it themselves instead of trying to ram their legislation down the throats of other nations. Now if only they would let their people have a larger say in what was and was not permitted...

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  11. This closure is nothing with evil government by everex · · Score: 4, Informative

    Becuase of the difference in cultural, you American sometimes cannot understand Chinese people. Something we think normal you think crazy. The reason to restrict build net cafe 200m away from school is that too many kids go to net cafes after school and spend too much time on computer games or internet surfing. Many parents complain about this. Another reason for closure is the porngraphy information. Viewing and keeping these pictures on pulic machines is prohibited in China. This is the same in pulic libraries in US.

  12. Re:China remains an Evil Empire by lysium · · Score: 4, Informative
    I guess you never heard of the whole "Free Tibet" thing, or those protests over allowing China into the WTO over their human rights record?

    You seriously have no idea what you are talking about.

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  13. Re:So? by swb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its their country, their rules..

    Let's take that idea to a logical conclusion:

    Sudan...it iss their country, their rules.

    Serbia...it is their country, their rules.

    We can go back in history and include Cambodia, Nazi Germany, ...

    I guess hatred of America is so strong these days that the Slashbots feel compelled to defend every other government, even some of the most despotic and totalitarian.

  14. Re:This just in... by dustmite · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're right, human rights abuses are only interesting when it's new/exciting information .. because it's not about the information, it's all about the topical buzz, the fashionable memes, yeah man. I mean who wants to discuss China's ongoing human rights abuses, that's like sooo yesterday already! What's "cool" today?

  15. Re:China remains an Evil Empire by phuturephunk · · Score: 4, Informative

    China cannot embrace a completely 'open' western style of democracy as trumpeted by the United States, it's an impossibility with their current population numbers and the land predicament that they're in.

    China has around 70% the arable land that the United States does yet it has around 4 times the population (give or take). With numbers of people like that and the sheer logistics of feeding them all, a more heavy handed form of 'population control' is needed above and beyond lightly recommending how people do things. This is why you've seen policies such as the 1 child rule and a general aversion to completely opening up internet access to the public. Some would say that this keeps them in a state of ignorance, but honestly we as Americans have absolutely no idea what it would be like to have that many Americans running around.

    Imagine this country with say.. 2.4 billion people walking around. It'd be a nightmare and if you think that the government of the US, if faced with the task of controlling and moving society along with that many people around, wouldn't impelement hard core big brother control, you have another thing coming. Free is a great idea when you have sea to shining sea and amber waves of grain, things get a bit hairer when famines could potentially kill HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS people and cause unrest on a scale never seen before by man if the dinner plate isn't filled. Also keep in mind that people are generally stupid and impulsive when they get into large groups (regardless of beliefs). This fact about human behavior has the potential to produce some pretty disasterous results.

    People like to point out that India is the world's largest democracy. What they fail to mention is that India also has one of the longest lived and highly adhered to caste structures ingrained into the very fabric of their society. So yeah, they're democratic but at the same time everyone is 'assigned' a place that they cannot move from, so you're back to rigid control of thoughts and ideas in one form or another. The benefit that India has is that their generally effective use of education still bolsters innovation.

    China does what it has to do to get the job done. No more, no less. I don't like the fact that they're communist. I don't like that fact that they censor and propogandize everything, but looking at it objectively, I can understand the effectiveness of the method.

  16. People just don't care by egy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I think it just too hard for us to understand china people. They have totally different culture from european/american, so they care more about where to get food than of human rights or freedom.

    I am from Ukraine, and in November, when it was Orange Revolution here in Ukraine, I've read various people comments on bbc.com on that topic (our revolution). While most comments were positive, I remember one comment from china's women; she was very negative and said that people should better care about other things as food, money and such.

    May be for china people it's acceptable that your goverment are gangsters and thiefs as long as they give you enouth food. For me, it isn't.

    PS. Sorry for my bad English.