Slashdot Mirror


100,000 Domains Sold for $164 Million

miller60 writes "Here's a news item that puts some hard data on the domain typo millionaires post from a couple weeks back. Marchex Inc. just paid $164 million to buy Name Development Ltd., an obscure company that displays pay-per-click keyword ads on 100,000 domains. It's not a stock swap, either, as $155 million of that was in cash. The seller reportedly built the portfolio by scarfing up expiring domains (including hardware-update.com, previously owned by Microsoft and linked from within the Windows 2000 OS) and replacing the content with pay-per-click ads."

50 of 287 comments (clear)

  1. why pay 1640$ per domain? by niall111 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    when you can buy them for 4.95$ a pop!?

    1. Re:why pay 1640$ per domain? by ghoti · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because you don't just want any old domain, but the ones that are most often visited by mistake.

      --
      EagerEyes.org: Visualization and Visual Communication
  2. Price not surprising at all. by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Do a Google search for "web traffic" and look at all the AdWord advertisements. Almost all of them are sites that buy expired domain names or common misspellings of domain names, and for the low-low price of $2 they'll send thousands of people to your web site via such domains.

    Also, for anyone that has used the site... www.whatismyip.com was up for an EBay auction that ended at about 11:00 pm EST last night. Last I checked the bidding was $55,000. Not sure what it ultimately sold for.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Price not surprising at all. by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sorry to reply to myself... I just found the EBay auction site again:

      Whatismyip.com Auction

      The final price? $386,100.00.

      --
      I'm a big tall mofo.
    2. Re:Price not surprising at all. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Informative

      What's horrible is that the guy who sold it was given the site as directed by the pervious owner's Will. He died and left it to this guy who sold it. Isn't that nice?

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    3. Re:Price not surprising at all. by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's horrible is that the guy who sold it was given the site as directed by the pervious owner's Will. He died and left it to this guy who sold it. Isn't that nice?

      That is truly horrible.

      You know, when I die, I think I will put a clause in my will that requires my next of kin to pay the estate taxes themselves, and LIVE in my house, not sell it. I mean, the thought of a next of kin selling something they don't want to maintain is just horrible.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  3. If you can't spell, support'em. by purduephotog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Visit the wrong domain and never click the ads.

    Bandwidth costs eat up profit margins.

    I've mistyped a few (slickdeals.com instead of .net, bensbargains.com instead of .net...) but as long as you don't click, there isn't any profit to be had.

    Of course, if you're like my fiancee and have trouble spelling any word... well, I can only hope those sites are limited to advertising only (and not phishing)...

  4. Re:Aggghh the pain. by NurseMaximum · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It's like "legitimate?" spam ??

    This isn't spam - you request a page, you see an advert, it's not forced into your inbox.

    This is seeing an opportunity and using it, and they deserve a bit of success from that. Whether they deserve $164m worth of success is another matter.

    --
    Who meta-moderates the meta-moderators?
  5. Astonished by mertner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm just astonished that this kind of thing actually works. Does *anyone* ever click on any of the ads when you arrive at one of these hijacked places?

    For me, it's ctrl-W or backspace, every time.

    --
    -- As long as the answer is right, who cares if the question is wrong?
    1. Re:Astonished by Steinfiend · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hate to admit it but I had never come across Ctrl+W as a command, so I tried it. I should have guessed it wouldn't be the shortcut for "give me a latte and a back rub please".

      Boy I have some off days!

  6. $257,000.00 by Mz6 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just cheked eBay and the final bid ended up at $257,000. Not bad for a site doing 3GB/day of bandwidth.

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:$257,000.00 by jafiwam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, Tardmo. You the stupid inexperinced one.

      Whatismyip.com and other similar sites are a great tool for any network admin that deals with lusers from other companies.

      I can't count how many times I have said "ok, what's the address of the mail server" and gotten something like "10.0.0.200" or "198.168.1.3". Sure, _I_ know what my machine IP is (most of the others on the network for that matter), and I know what my WAN IP is and the DMZ IPs of my servers. However, my customers dont... likewise even if they do know ipconfig and can do it on their machine, it is a local network IP that doesn't do any good when looking for the WAN IP. For that, you need to know it, get it from the ISP (good fucking luck with that) or have them log into a router... (if they know what a router IS.)

      What IP points to the outside world on any given network probably escapes the average "comptuer guy" at small companies.

      Rather than getting the clueless to figure out or find out the IP from their ISP, it is a lot easier just to send them to one of those sites and have them read off the number. Most of them are not too numb to read a number out loud, though having them cut and paste it into an email can catch the ones that are dislexic.

      I use some of the sites listed at "traceroute.org" rather than the other ones... no confusing flashy ads, just the start IP of the trace.

    2. Re:$257,000.00 by XorNand · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are some dynmaic dns utilities that automatically poll and screen scrape IP addresses off pages such as this. A client that I use polls every minute, cycling through about 15 different sites. This means that I myself am accounting for a hit every 15 mins to whatismyip.com. Yet, I never see the content on the page and rarely even think about it. Not exactly making the ideal situation for those bidding on the domain. Plus, add in the number of techies who aren't inclined to click on banner ads when they're actively trying to troubleshoot (the most likely use of the site), and the extreme ease of setting up a competing service. Nah... the winning bidder isn't getting much of a deal here.

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
  7. So do all of these domains point to one subnet? by caryw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I work at an ISP. If all these domains point to the same class C or something I'll just block it at the router if it's purely advertising junk.
    Anyone know details? Thanks.
    - Cary
    --Fairfax Underground: Where Fairfax County comes out to play

    1. Re:So do all of these domains point to one subnet? by mjfrazer · · Score: 5, Informative
      careerinfo.com has address 83.138.187.18
      rentguide.com has address 83.138.187.18
      hardware-update.com has address 83.138.187.18

      So, i'd say yes...

    2. Re:So do all of these domains point to one subnet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you selling internet service, or managed security networking service? Does maintaining "common carrier" status hold any meaning for you?

      If I'm buying access to the whole internet (and not to a managed content-provider) I want the whole internet, not your filtered version of it. I'm a big boy and I'll protect my network and hosts from Bad Things(c) without your blackbox filtering TYVM.

  8. Slashdot by prakslash · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder how much this will sell for? :-)

    http://slsahdot.org

  9. Not a new idea. by radiotyler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If it walks and barks like a dog, it's a dog, no matter what you call it.

    Have you ever called 1-800-COL-LECT? Have you ever called 1-800-COL-MECT? Same thing. You get a "collect call long distance provider". Just not the one you wanted. Profiting off of other peoples' errors isn't exactly a new idea. This is just a variation on a theme.

    On a funny note, I originally heard about this 800 number scheme while reading Jenna Jameson's autobiography, "How to Make Love Like a Porn Star: A Cautionary Tale". Her husband apparentally made quite a bit of money in the mistyped 800 number business.

    --
    hi mom!
    1. Re:Not a new idea. by generic-man · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I grew up on Long Island, home of 1-800-FLOWERS (now 1-800-FLOWERS.com) (really), and I saw articles about the company getting pissed off at competitors who did things like this. Some competitors bought 1-800-FL0WERS (with a zero) and 1-800-FLOWER5 (with a 5).

      Ever wonder why 1-800-MATTRESS ends every commercial with people spelling their name melodically? It's because they don't own 1-800-MATRESS -- or at least they didn't years ago.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Not a new idea. by flabbergast · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This reminds me of a 60 Minutes report I saw probably ten years ago. A *ahem* gentleman had setup a whole bunch of long distance companies, with names like "I don't care", "Anyone" or "It doesn't matter." So, back in the day when you dialed the operator to make a long distance collect call from a pay phone, they'd ask you for your LD carrier preference. You say "It doesn't matter" and *boom*! $10 a minute. Argghh!!

  10. Look No Further by Laurentiu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The fine folks at BuyDomains.com still have the SlashDot.Net for sale, and "The quoted price will be at least $688 and may be over $10,000." Valid business model or what?

    (I intentionally left out all AhRefs, if you really want to see it, type away, I don't endorse domain stealers.)

    --
    Just /. IT
  11. Re:THANK YOU! by meheler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not to be a bitch to a bitch, but sometimes e-mail addresses go defunct and one doesn't think to update the domain record because one doesn't realise that one needs that particular e-mail address to renew an expired domain. How many people have stopped using the e-mail address on their domain record because it was inundated with spam, or just registered with a temporary address? What happens if your e-mail address goes bad (i.e. a former free web email service decides to start charging, or an ISP goes under, or in a fit of rage you cancel all association with your ISP) and you forget your domain password? There are ways around it, but unless you've had to deal with it before, most people won't know what to do.

    Please think.

  12. Almost like store placement by jfried · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was told a story that McDonalds spends millions on strategic restraunt locations, where it would see the most traffic, and the condition of the neighborhood and all kinds of good statistics. what ever it takes to find the perfect store location.

    Then burger king builds across the street.

    1. Re:Almost like store placement by luiss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've heard this too. But I've also heard that they know this, and they buy the property across the street too. Burger King can then either buy or lease from McDonalds.

  13. hope they bought title insurance by _|()|\| · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You couldn't pay me to own a bunch of typo. domain names. It sounds like a thousand lawsuits waiting to happen.

    1. Re:hope they bought title insurance by ajs · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not illegal. At least not by default.

      Where it becomes a problem is when you attempt to steal customers in this way. For example, you would be well within your right to put up a site called slashdot.info and have as the main page, "[ad] [ad] [ad] Sorry, you typed slashdot.info [ad] and you probably meant [ad] to type slashdot.org [ad] [ad] [ad]".

      You are providing a (questionably useful) service ad deriving advertising from it. Trademark law allows for this. When, on the other hand, you put up a site that looks exactly like Slashdot.org with your own ad revenue, but is at slashdot.info, then Slashdot would have every right to sue.

      Honestly, I'm at a loss to understand the anger here. Even if you don't tell the poor sap where to go, this just seems like a silly thing to get upset about. It's not at all a zero-sum game, so relax and take a deep breath.

  14. Fun with PPC adverts by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can have tremendous fun with other people's pay-per-click adverts if you have an ADSL connection and spend time not using it every day {like when you're at work, or asleep}. All it takes is a list of open proxies and a list of known PPC adverts. Then you write a little script that goes around "clicking" on PPC adverts via various proxies. Of course, you don't have to do anything useful with the "data" you retrieve.

    One day, I might even write a screensaver that does exactly this.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  15. Haven't people learned about google? by vagabond_gr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I had the impression that the buy-a-domain-to-be-rich story was over, not only due to NASDAQ, but also because of google! I can't imagine anyone who wants to update its hardware typing www.hardware-update.com, instead of googling "hardware update" (and at least in the first 20 pages of results that I checked, hardware-update.com does not appear!). Personally I even type "apple" in the google bar sometimes, its easier than www.apple.com).

    Apparently domain sales prove me wrong.

    1. Re:Haven't people learned about google? by jaguar5150 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Personally I even type "apple" in the google bar sometimes, its easier than www.apple.com"

      Or you could save yourself even more time, by typing "apple" in the address bar and hitting "ctrl-enter"

      (inserts the http://www.|whatever-you-typed|.com for you)

      Works in IE and Firefox, not sure about the others.

  16. Re:Aggghh the pain. by fuzzybunny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What a lot of the "this isn't fair, this is criminal, this is predatory" posts seem to be predicated around is the mistaken belief that life is fair and that the stupid should have the same good life as the intelligent.

    This is not a life insurance-selling shill forcing his way into some poor ignorant grandma's house, putting pressure tactics on her to buy into scam xyz. Much like people caught up in ponzi scams, Tom Vu seminars, what have you, it is entirely up to the user what he sees. Remember that truism about lotteries being a tax on people who're bad at math? Well there you go.

    Nor are these guys pushing (for the most part) spyware, trojans, credit card theft, viruses, what-have-you, on unsuspecting PC users who've taken all reasonable precautions. I understand that your post is facetious (at least I hope it is) but referring to what I wrote above, the stupid, ignorant and lazy have exactly the same chances as everyone else. What they make of them is entirely up to them, including learning how to spell slsahdot.

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  17. So, can we expect... by http101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...yet another hotfix from Microsoft to remove the coded BSOD link to www.hardware-update.com since it contains ads, possible spyware, and not to mention Marchex Inc. might start charging Microsoft just for using their name in the OS they sell for $249.99 (US)?

    --
    -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
  18. Hard to find available .com domains these days by ylikone · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I find it is almost impossible to buy a .com domain anymore, at least one that isn't just a random bunch of letters. And the problem is that almost everything you try will just end up going to a site with a load of ads and not pertaining to the subject matter of the domain name at all. Maybe there should be a rule against this... buying a domain JUST to put up ads should be illegal.

    But I suppose when one is googling, the easiest thing to do to find good results is to NOT click on .com links, instead go for the .org links which usually contain actual information.

    Hey, since we're on the topic of domain sales, I own customalbum.com and it's for sale. Never did anything with it. Anyone have ideas for what I could do with this domain (other than try to sell it)?

    --
    Meh.
  19. Re:Aggghh the pain. by stupidfoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, the number is actually spelled "googol" and not google (which was an accidental misspelling of googol) or googil. Googil is actually closer to the real spelling.

  20. How they do it? by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 2, Informative

    Same thing happened to my old domain, but luckily I was able to snag one close enough not to matter. Still, you have to wonder about all the asshats holding on to "DorothyLSmith.com" or whatever. I guess they're in it for the long haul. In a way, it's like Old West stakeholders -- just stake your claim and you get the property rights forever and ever, providing you keep paying your taxes (registration). Forget to make a payment, and all the jackals come out of the woodwork.

    They must be running some kind of automated system that spiders URLs, puts them in a database, then looks up the registration expiration date, puts that in the database. Then you just have a script running all the time. Sort the data in reverse chronological order by expiration date, then when the time comes, run a "register" script that attempts to automatically register the domain.

    Thing is, this has to be extremely expensive. I guess the profit margins on people trying to buy back their domains is high enough to offset the loss of all the useless domains you purchase. You could mitigate the cost by going through the database and flagging URLs that don't look like they'd generate any profit.

    This is basically your textbook definition of bottom-feeding.

  21. Re:grrr by Mantorp · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was going to suggest you get definately.com but it's been taken as well.

  22. How about a new Firefox extension by thrillseeker · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Anyone out there got an itch to write a useful extension for Firefox? One that catches any domain name that leechers (yes, they are leechers - they are capitalizing on someone's mistake, not their intent) use to take unfair advantage, and redirects it to the intended site. It'd need an easy "on/off" button so that you could visit the crap sites if you wanted.

    You'd be an internet hero.

    1. Re:How about a new Firefox extension by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 2, Funny

      It could detect when you were misspelling the domain name and suggest an appropriate replacement:

      You asked for slashdpt.org, but that domain is now owned by domain-snatching, spam-feeding liars that get rich because people like you can't spell/type.

      Perhaps you meant slashdot.org?

    2. Re:How about a new Firefox extension by fyoder · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Something that would convert what you type to something else you've specified in a list. It wouldn't be populated by default initially, since the main objection would be that you can't really assume for everyone, but lists would pop up on web sites, and those could be used rather than populating from scratch. Like adblock.

      Also like adblock, it would support regular expressions. The first thing I would add to my list is conversion of a final .co to .com . That's a common typo for me. Hasn't resulted in bogus web sites, but would be nice if firefox just 'knew' that for me .co domains are actually .com .

      This post constitutes prior art for any potentially patentable ideas expressed. Maybe that should be a standard sig these days.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
  23. I think this passage from Wikipedia is fitting.. by phuturephunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    About Warren Buffet: Buffett believes that much of the problem with the economies of the United States and other industrialized countries in recent years results from the proliferation of persons and organizations who produce nothing directly but are compensated based on the volume of business which they transact. He feels that most stock trades are recommended and made primarily to benefit the brokers rather than the investors and has stated that he feels that the world would benefit if each person had a lifetime maximum of twenty stock trades. He steadfastly refuses to split Berkshire Hathaway stock because the purpose of this would be to facilitate trading, which he has no desire to do. -Wikipedia entry on Warren Buffett Read that passage, then read it again..and when you're done reading it, read it one more time. Then you'll understand why some knucklehead will pay 160 million clams for absolutely nothing of real hard value.

  24. Re:Aggghh the pain. by StyroCupMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't mind if I happen to type in the wrong page and see a bunch of useless ads. What irks me is when I am trying to do a search and all it returns are links to those ad pages.

    --
    If I may say so, life is a game, and there's so much to do and so few turns.
    -Reiner Knizia
  25. Re:Aggghh the pain. by bigberk · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This isn't spam - you request a page
    Even though I'm a dedicated spam fighter, I'd have to agree with respect to the domains. It really doesn't seem like spam to me by any accepted definition of the word. I am just amazed though that people will start clicking ads when they reach a site which is obviously the wrong one. How does an average person's thought process work?
    • I want to go read my localnewspaper.tld
    • clickety clickety localnewspapper.tld
    • Oh, this is obviously not the newspaper site
    • This strange gentleman is offering me a mortgage! Come to think of it, my pocketbook has been feeling heavy lately. I'll bite!
    I just don't understand how people think, I guess. Neither do they probably. But I guess this is what American style "impulse buying" is all about. The marketing psychologists have trained society so well that all you have to do is show advertising, even out of context, and people bite.
  26. Re:Aggghh the pain. by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A lot depends on how they use they typo page.
    If they are clearly the wrong page then I see no harm in it. If they try to look like the typo page then that is wrong.
    The best of them even put up a link to the correct page.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  27. Re:Aggghh the pain. by essreenim · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Oh please it opens up a whole binch of pop-up ads, and though many browsers counter this, that doesn't make it right. The combined amount of home users supplying the domain owners with cash is equivalent to a _fre_ distributed computer (thousands of advertisements links opened). And how much money do the maintainers of this distributed virtual computer get (the home users) - zero. The fat cat domain owners profit from their cpu utilization, badwidth and time. Sorry, no soothing away you consciousness here!! jk

    That's my opinion anyway. I think its wrong. Buying a domain and selling it on at a huge profit however is not the same thing, and I have no problem with this provided the domain wasn't used for the above purpose in between..

  28. Solutions by F�an�ro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Users misspell domain names, causing actions they do not want...

    so, what technical solutions could we use for this problem?
    We could of course leave it as it is, a la survival of the fittest. Or we could try educating users not to mispell (fat chance). But are there other options?

    Credit card companies and banks have been dealing with somewhat similar probems, their solution usually involves checksum digits included in each number

    Could we apply a simmilar system to domain names?

    i.e advertise a www address as
    httX:/Y/zzz.com
    where httX tells the browser that the next character is a checksum, and Y is the one-digit checksum for "zzz.com"?

    users of older browsers would still be able to visit such a domain by leaving out the checksum

    Or, make a new top level domain, .check, where the second-level-domain has to be a checksum for the rest?
    http://zzz.Y.check

    this would require no changes in current software, but would require companies to use something else but .com in their domains.

    Any other ideas? What do you think?

  29. Re:grrr by rush22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Happend to me too. I decided not to renew my domain name (thinking it was too obscure, and noone would buy it off me). I hadn't updated in a long time and was quite bored with it, and especially having it hanging over my head. I did have really good traffic for a while.

    Long story short: A day or two after I let it expire it became a porn portal, then a redirect to a different porn portal. Then about 2 years later, a "search engine". Now it's that same porn portal again. 4 years and counting.

    What I want to know is who the hell was giving out my traffic information and who the hell let these ***holes know that I hadn't renewed it?

    What do they do? Search google for URLs randomly all day? Or randomly type in names into networksolutions to see if they're available??

    I'm not pissed someone took it, that's fine. What I am pissed about is that now people think I turned my site into some junk spam porno crap. They even kept my folder names!

  30. Apple Tech support # was spoofed by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Funny



    Back in the mid-nineties I worked at APple Technical Support here in Austin. We'd frequently get people on the phone who would say, "Did you know that if you dial 1-800-SOS-APPL with a zero in SOS you get a porn line?" I would usually tell people that was a service provided by Apple for people without internet connections.

  31. Stop Yer Whining! by cjsnell · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Don't tell me about losing domains. In 1994, I registered several very good domains:

    snell.org (Me of course)
    cjs.com (Me again)
    eleet.com (I thought I was...)
    grateful.com (I was into the Grateful Dead)
    bikeworld.com (for my dad's co.)

    When NSI took over registrar duties for .com/.net/.org, they started charging $70/yr/domain. I was a poor college student, barely able to buy food (much less $350/yr of domains) so I let them expire--except for bikeworld.com (Dad paid for that one).

    Biggest. Mistake. Ever.

    Here's a little snippet from the WHOIS record for grateful.com:


    Administrative Contact:
    Reflex Publishing Inc.
    Internet Admin (not for sale) (admin@reflex.com)
    +1.8133544500
    Fax: +1.8133544500
    1971 W. Lumsden Rd. #110
    Brandon, FL 33511
    US


    "not for sale" ... As if this asshat thought up this domain in the first place.

    I get sick to my stomach every time I think about this.

  32. Something is bogus about Marchex by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative
    This is all very strange. Marchex is a small company. In their last reporting quarter, they made only $144,000 on revenue of about $12 million. Then, suddenly, despite their lousy track record, they did an IPO for $222 million and got onto the NASDAQ National Market System.

    With the revenue from this, they bought a collection of domain names of marginal value. It looks like they actually paid out only only $24.6 million on cash upfront for Name Development. And even that goes into escrow for 18 months. Name Development's income for 2004 was $4.6 million.

    Name Development seems to be one guy operating out of the Virgin Islands who sold click-throughs to Yahoo:

    • Name Development currently earns 100% of its revenue through the outsourcing of its pay-per-click listings to one major provider, Yahoo!

    Marchex is the target of spyware/adware litigation:

    • On February 3, 2005, we received notice of a purported class action complaint entitled Pagniello v. Cool Web Search, Enhance Interactive, Inc., Marchex, Inc., FindWhat.com Inc., Google Inc., Yahoo/Overture Search Engine Co., Microsmarts, LLC, STOPzilla, Inc., PC Tools Pty Ltd., eBlocs.com, and Network Dynamics Corporation, which was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on January 24, 2005. The complaint alleges that the defendants have exploited web browsers and reconfigured his and others' computers by installing code on their computers without their approval or knowledge and seeks injunctive relief and damages. Based on our initial review of the complaint, we believe that we have meritorious defenses to these claims and intend to contest them vigorously. However, since the litigation is in a preliminary stage and any litigation is inherently uncertain, it is not feasible at this time to predict how this matter will proceed, what the ultimate outcome will be or whether an unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse impact on our business.

    I don't see how this adds up to a company with a market cap of $761 million. This looks more like a dud dot-com.

  33. Re:1640 Per Domain? by blogeasy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Internet domain names are a lot like commercial real estate. The value is based on traffic count much like the number of cars that pass by a retail shopping center. Real estate investors also use solid investment analysis when considering the purchase of properties which makes the sale of these domains interesting.

    It was noted on NetCraft that these domains get about 17 million unique visitors a month and at a $5.00 CPM (which is quite generous) that would be $85,000 a month ($1.02 million a year) in revenue. Consequently, the ROI (Return on Investment) would be 0.622% which is a very poor rate to receive.

    In order to get a decent ROI, the new owners are going to have to increase traffic, create better content for higher paying ads, or provide some upsell item with a high profit margin and conversion rate. If this were a real estate property, this rate of return would definately make this property a "don't wanter".

    --

    Browse the Information Directory
  34. Re:Aggghh the pain. by releppes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're right! It's not spam, but to actually credit dirt bags like this for scrafing up domain names as "intellegent" or "opportunits", I think is just wrong.

    I totally hate how expiring domain names are up for grabs the minute they expire, because it creates the very market for nasty tactics like snagging someones domain. Yeah it's legal, but the morality is just wrong.

    I think there should be a waiting period after a domain name expires. Say a company goes out of buisness, decides not to renew, whatever the reason, that domain name should become void for a period of a year. After that point, then it becomes availible for purchase.

    I just think that's the responsible thing to do with respect to the end consumer.