Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft AntiSpyware thinks Firefox is Spyware

brightertimes writes "It seems that microsoft's new AntiSpyware (beta) is now advising users to remove Firefox on their computers.. A Zeropaid.com thread shows the offending screenshot in action. Once your scanning has been done, if Firefox is found on your computer it provides the user with a "high" threat level and advising removal due to of lack of security updates." CT Several users have noted that the screenshot is likely fake.

29 of 454 comments (clear)

  1. Not true.... by scifience · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I just ran a "Deep Scan" with MS Anti-Spyware on a machine with Firefox 1.0 installed. I got 0 results for spyware.

    1. Re:Not true.... by epedersen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have ran the scan on my computers with both Firefox 1.0 and Firefox 1.0.1 and the only Spyware that the MS Anti-Spyware finds is RealVNC.

    2. Re:Not true.... by Martin+Taylor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Jesus H, It's obviously a photoshop, the thread that they link to is clearly a joke. It took about 10 seconds to tell that this is a hoax. How in the hell can this make the front page? It's just insane. People subscribe to /.? People are paid to run this site? For this and same-day dupes?

    3. Re:Not true.... by diverman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, then why is slashdot leaving a false claim (despite the small editor's note) on the top of their main page???

      While I'm totally NOT an M$ fan, it is kinda lame to have that claim shown to be false on the main page.

      -Alex

  2. Duh...hello? Anyone home? by lxt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aside from the fact anyone with a sane mind would be able to work out it was a fake, here are a few details that might help you:

    1) "FireFox is an alternative browser" - you'd never, ever, find Microsoft saying that now. They'd say "FireFox is an internet browser".

    2) "May perform operations differently from the default browser" - similarly, you could have Firefox as the default browser. Microsoft would never say these on anything they produce, because it would be seen as insinuating Internet Explorer was the only "official" net browser for Windows.

    But hey, when did anything like logical reasoning ever stop Slashdot editors?

  3. Joke by Monx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a joke. Read the forum in linked to in the summary. Why is this on Slashdot w/out the foot icon?

  4. Sounds bogus to me by Ridgelift · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hmm..seems kind of fishy to me.

    So I fired up VMWare where I have a legit install of XP Pro. I downloaded the latest copy of Microsoft's Anti-Spyware program and updated to the latest signatures.

    Here are my results.

    I'll admit it, I don't like Microsoft. I've even been modded down into the basement for my anti-Microsoft comments in the past. But even I think this sort of stuff does not belong on Slashdot.

    Beat 'em with the truth, not lies.

  5. Jumping the Shark by VividU · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Slashdot has just jumped the shark with this pathetic, sad posting.

    1. Re:Jumping the Shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Slashdot has just jumped the shark with this pathetic, sad posting.

      Dude, /. "jumped the shark" a long, long time ago. /., like AT&T, is running on what it once was, not what it is.

    2. Re:Jumping the Shark by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is true. If it weren't for the fact that once or twice a day I read a post here that makes me laugh raucously, or I actually learn a tidbit of useful information from a well informed comment, I would have gone long ago, as would have most people. Nobody comes to Slashdot for the "articles" the editors post these days, as they suck about 90% of the time.

  6. Re:Predicted on Slashdot by d3ac0n · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The most important part of any scam:

    No matter how outrageous your claim, if you make it believeable, people will fall for it.

    Nicely done gentlemen, nicely done indeed.

    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
  7. The Firefox listing is a fake... by yeremein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...but what about VNC? Doesn't Microsoft have VNC-server-like functionality built in to XP? Where is that in their list?

  8. One More Word. by DarkMantle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    FUD

    --
    DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
  9. Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "CT Several users have noted that the screenshot is likely fake."

    should read

    "CT The article notes that the screenshot is fake."

    1. Re:Taco by Amtiskaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I love how they weren't skeptical enough about this picture to even consider the possibility it was faked, but they're skeptical enough about the actual author saying it's "obviously faked" to conclude that it's just "likely".

  10. Possible Disability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    With the postings of duplicate stories, lack of editing of submissions for spelling and grammar, and the not actually READING of the submitted material (the original poster of the image joked about it being a fake two hours after the image was posted), has anyone considered that CmdrTaco might just be a functioning illiterate? I mean, seriously. Why would anyone do this kind of stuff to their own website, one which has such a community effect?

    If you just don't care anymore Taco, then turn the keys over to someone who does. Someone who doesn't mind putting effort into a quality product.

  11. O rly? by Vicsun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "CT: Several users have noted that the screenshot is likely fake." Likely? I'd love to see what evidence is needed before it's conclusively determined it's fake.

  12. -1 Troll by DJStealth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the kind of thing that makes me wish we had mod points to mod articles down to "-1 Troll".

    Maybe if we can mod articles, we won't see dups and things like this anymore.

  13. Let The "L33T G33Kz" WHiNE SoME MoRE by binaryFX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Time and again I find myself reading Slashdot posts from the open-source community which are c0nstantly trying to find ways to bash M$ in order to "show people the light"... The fact of the matter is, BS like this only hurts the community's credibility. If you ever hope to counter M$ arguments against open-source's TCO then you have to stop with this shit and actually devel a better product. Right now, the sad truth is, M$ is simply unrivaled even by *nix in the workstation and corporate/business markets. The software for *nix systems simply isn't there or hasn't evolved enough to make it a financially wise decision for many to make the switch. Sure, open-source has made huge inroads in the server market, and with the Mozilla Foundation - but your baseless bashing serves no purpose other than to discredit the community as a whole.

  14. Just wait for the dup posting... by toupsie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It will only, truly be a shark jumping when Michael dups the post within 24 hours and puts the posting death penalty on a few responders for noticing.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  15. Re:Next Slashdot story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Or I can tell them all! It's actually not! I checked! I took a hit for the rest of us! HIS DEVIOUS PLAN HAS FAILED!!!!

  16. Re:Predicted on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nicely done? This doesn't even take any skill. It's not hard to doctor an image consisting of solid background colors and system default fonts. Another example.

    This was not an impressive scam by any measure. Just goes to show how dumb people are.

  17. 'News' for nerds.... by wtmcgee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    /. has turned into a rumor site lately.

    What gives?

    --
    *** For a better tommorow, change your life today ***
  18. Re:Read by Trick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And, in the words of the guy who posted the image:

    What the hell does it say for slashdot that this nonsense made it to their "news" pages? Just what kind of far out shit has CmdrTaco been smoking lately? Doesn't he even bother to check these things out before he posts them? Or even to read the frickin thread? Too funny.

    You've got to love that, even after stuff like this in the very thread they linked to, the closest thing to a retraction the editors can come up with is "several have pointed out that it is likely fake."

  19. It was a *mistake*, so fucking chill by cgrayson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My god, I don't think I've ever seen so many nasty vitriolic comments on Slashdot before. Not even directed against traditional flamewar enemies like Real, RIAA or MS itself.

    It's called a "mistake", and they happen to everyone. Lucky for us readers, ours don't happen in front of 4 quadrillion page-views per day.

    So okay, all you me-too'ers, chill with the anti-CmdrTaco rants and cheap shots about how it'll be dupe-posted tomorrow. Har har. You're fucking hilarious. Whoo. I'm all tired out from laughing at your cleverness.

    Meanwhile, not a single criticism of whatever dumbass with too much time on his or her hands it was that Photoshopped this up in the first place! Allow me to be the first. "Dumbass!"

    To whoever said this proved that Slashdot jumped the shark, I'm worried it may be true - only not of the editors; of the readers and commenters.

  20. Comedy for nerds, stuff that doesn't matter by The_Incubator · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Last week I told myself I was quitting slashdot cold-Turky after the late Febuary posting of a "news" story about Dell entering the HDTV market with a plasma panel that was reviewed by CNET in November. I thought that story making the front page pretty much embodied everything that has come to suck about Slashdot.

    I lasted about a day, and then I thought "oh hell, I've been reading Slashdot for years, I can't stop so I'll just read it once a day or something."

    Now this story makes me realize that Slashdot has simply evolved and I've taken too long to catch up. This isn't a new site anymore, it's a comedy site. It's pure comedy to watch the bumbling idiots who run this site post same-day dupes, fake stories, last year's news today, etc. etc.

    So while I used to read slashdot as a news site and get exasperated at it's terrible execution as such, now I read it as a comedy show and laugh my ass off. It's like reading the class clown's blog.

    Nick

  21. Re:TACO IS AN IDIOT by rebeka+thomas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Before blasting slashdot, I think slashdot has handled this better simply by nature than most other news sites.

    I've seen links to this image at least half a dozen times already. Only on slashdot have I seen the uproar in comments that it's a fake. Only on slashdot have people bothered researching the info behind the photograph to see what happened. Hell, only on slashdot was a link given to the original thread so we could find this out for ourselves. Everywhere else just had a bunch of drooling fools looking over the image and laughing at how desperate MS looks, while here we find the true story because of the strength of comments and the comment moderation system.

    Slashdot is doing better than regular news sources that regularly print misinformation, one sided stories and complete fabrications with no recourse for comments by readers who do know better.

    --
    RST
  22. Clear and utter bullshit by rjdohnert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have used the Microsoft Anti-Spyware program with Firefox installed and it doesnt do that to me. Clearly a clever fake

  23. It is just a fake! by jolero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been using Firefox and AntiSpyware on 3 boxes for some time and nothing like that happened.